Alex is reading a story about this from the American Free Press, which is a flagrantly anti-Semitic outlet founded by white supremacist Willis Cardo. The writer of the piece Alex is reading is Michael Collins Piper, who's the former editor for the Liberty Lobby and has a deep history of anti-Semitic slop.

Well, the top of the Democrat Party mouthpiece, the Drudge Report, has the headline: Make America Great Again, Divorce.

And they're paying, and the USAID and through NGOs is paying Reuters. Reuters and London to do hit pieces on conservatives across the United States.

They want to tell you. That he was a white supremacist. Yes. And not see his very Hispanic-looking face.

Jimmy is invested in making Trump out to be just another politician because that's an improvement in his image. Treating Trump like a threat to all our public safety makes him a pretty much unsellable candidate, which sucks for him. The whole brand is shitting on Democrats and pretending to attack them from the left, but with right-wing positions. So the thing that the Democrats are fighting can't possibly be something that you actually need to fight to. It has to just be an illusion, just another politician with big promises that doesn't do anything. With Trump, from most of Jimmy's audience, that's a comforting thought. With Harris and the Democrats, the audience fears that they would just be another normal politician. They would say the right things and inspire hope that things could be better and then just be another establishment hack. With Trump, the fear is that he's not. The fear is that he means what he's saying and will try to assert dictatorial type powers. By lombasting Trump as just another politician, Jimmy's actually doing amazing PR work for Trump among this kind of disaffected pretending to be left-wing audience.

So see the media spinning it for him at every level, carrying his water.

So Alex believes that the media has entirely turned against Biden and they're openly mocking him to his face by saying he's going to have a big boy press conference.

I read the Supreme Court ruling or scanned over it when it came out about an hour ago. And I wanted to make sure, and I called a couple constitutional lawyers who'd already read it, one of them Robert Barnes, and I just talked to each of the two lawyers I talked to about 60 seconds, and I said, am I correct the media is downplaying or not even covering the fact that they basically said Jack Smith's office was not created constitutionally, so the whole thing has to be thrown out? And they said, correct. And am I correct if they're whitewashing that the judge has been totally reversed and that Trump clearly did these acts, which weren't even criminal, in his presidential capacity, which he has total immunity in, and that only impeachment is the way to remove a president and then he can be charged? And he was never convicted. He only started the process in the two impeachments. The lawyers were like, yes, that's exactly right. So the corporate media is spinning it that this Obama-appointed globalist judge that's gone along with all this fraud who just got reversed, that it's in her hands.

I mean, the one thing that, like, I guess, like, you know, not living here for so long teaches you is that like you got to take every country on its own terms. You know, often when I look at American media, I don't really want to sort of give too many people a kicking here, but I just feel like some of the debates just sort of lack that perspective.

Stelter was definitely the mouth of the globalists for a bit.

I mean, the Atlantic Monthly, that's the mouthpiece of Sauron. The mouth of Satan came out two weeks ago and said...

And there's a couple things that really stuck out to me. One was they just have Trump liars on, and they just let them talk. I'm sorry? Yeah, I mean, they have, like, Jason Miller. Right, right, right. More or less, like, you know, he might as well be Trump campaign guy. Right, right. I think he is. Might as well be Stephen Miller, yeah. And he will just say trolly shit. And nonsense. And they just have to go along with it. It's a choice to interview him. And they make that choice. The news anchors are just like, wow. There's too much that he's saying that's full of shit that they can't even really deal with it. And he's saying it with a smirk. And it's like, okay, well, we don't have time to fact check you saying there's a migrant invasion of the country. And so this just stands on NBC News. And it's... It's irresponsible. I found this to be, like, this isn't news. This is, like, haphazard, like, presentation of dangerous material.

But it's almost to be expected because, you know, you want to have the image of fairness. Right. And so when one party is completely insane. Right. Being fair means broadcasting insane shit. Right, right, right. And that, I think, is a problem.

Alex isn't into that. He takes the unconfirmed numbers as concrete and then accuses the other media outlets of not covering the story. In reality, other U.S. mainstream media outlets covered this battle, and with the gift of hindsight, they were much more accurate.

And not only that, the rest of the media refuses to even cover the story. It's incredibly important for Alex to present the rest of the media as covering up all the truths that he relays to the audience, because those same media outlets often report out information that debunks his narratives. So nothing they say should be taken seriously.

So I want to roll some of this video. slavery still practiced across large areas of Africa, but because it's black-on-black slavery, the Western media will not cover it.

He's essentially arguing that this click within the mainstream alternative media is beholden to and makes excuses for Musk in a way that they wouldn't for other figures and didn't before Elon Musk bought Twitter.

Folks like Rogan do not treat Musk how they would treat someone else in his position. If the only thing Musk was doing was the brain chips and he wasn't Elon Musk and didn't own Twitter, they would never stop talking about how he was secretly trying to turn people into robots on behalf of Satan or the globalists. Leave alone all the stuff about the contracts with the Pentagon and shit like that. That would be endlessly assessed. David Icke is a madman, but he has rightly assessed that these people have a suspicious lapse in their inquisitiveness when it comes to Musk, and unfortunately, that's not something that's supposed to be called out. Musk gives these man figures access, and they don't want to jeopardize that access, being able to pile around with one of the richest men on Earth.

And to that point, I made the point on our last episode that I think Tucker is a willing participant in Putin-glorifying propaganda, and he's not being a useful idiot in this whole thing.

And the media basically covers it up.

And I remember when that guy drove from Illinois to shoot up the Republican baseball game close to you there in D.C. Wolf Blitzer said this guy was not a monster. He was angry.

But I really do think I give balanced coverage from my worldview. I honestly believe the things I say and I do.

And Alex, a lot of his coverage is in service of furthering that goal for Trump. And I find that to be pretty offensive and distasteful.

Whether it's the Washington Post or the New York Times or CNN, nauseating coverage, defending pedophilia and saying that There is no child kidnapping. There is no child trafficking. It does not exist.

If you've never been a candidate for president, the media hated more than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

NPR hasn't savaged anyone in their entire existence.

The media is anti-Christian.

by saying the things he's saying, Alex is 100% being a Russia apologist. He doesn't want people to think that he is, and he knows that once the fog of war clears, he doesn't want people to think that he's a Russian.

But see, the media doesn't show that because they're helping promote that idea that that's a good thing to happen or that whites deserve it.

Alex deprives his audience of being able to make an informed decision about people and events by only presenting a tailored version of reality curated to serve whatever the current narratives and needs are.

Folks, that's a big deal to have multiple national shows editing out Congress having a big round of applause when Bush says that the Patriot Act is set to repeal in 05.

I can say that the picture that's painted in the article is fair in as much as it reflects the texts, but it also doesn't include a ton of other context from texts. There's a selectiveness to what's being covered, which is always going to be an angle for possible criticism by someone like Alex when you're addressing his personal life. Case in point, the SPLC article, it says that Alex's wife mentions that they should get divorced six times in the text, which is true. But the texts also include Alex saying that multiple times himself. When you introduce the notion that she wanted a divorce at times, It comes an omission to not also mention that he did.

Alex desperately wants it to be real so it can help justify his hatred of immigrants. So as far as Infowars is concerned, it's definitely real. That's the level of rigor that he brings to the table and why people should trust him as a good source of information.

I'm not saying that they did, but it felt so in sync, this idea of like this media rush over the 78 specific outlets that influence. Meanwhile... So there's a coordinated message, I think that's what you said. Yeah. Meanwhile, There's the same amount of kids getting killed in Chicago every week, but there's no coordinated message about that.

Alex Jones had the biggest book in the country, but the New York Times lied about that because the New York Times doesn't want you to know that.

Well, he'll accept anybody who says what he wants them to say, and he'll also make up things to add on to things. Right, right, right. People who are saying things that are close to what he wants them to say.

This is the Denver Post who's outraged. Who's normally, you know, socialist and for all this, but it's even outraging Diane Carman.

And I hate covering this stuff, but the media isolates it and suppresses it. And then when a crazy white person, and they're out there, a bad white person goes out there and does something evil, man, it is the top story everywhere. And every white person is guilty. Every white person is to blame collectively.

We'll never know the truth about all the pharmaceutical pills that this individual was on because the mainstream media is funded by Big Pharma, so you're not allowed to talk about that kind of...

Because the system wants to guilt white people to sign on to the globalist agenda.

The Washington Post, with the sub-headline, Democracy Dies in Darkness, says it's time to give the elites a bigger say in choosing the president. The elites.

But the media is not going to. Stick the knife in and turn it and tell white people to hate black people like they would have done if a white person would have done this.

Now, simultaneously, we have the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN. I have articles here today specifically saying I talk about a new world order and that it's hateful and bad and that it doesn't exist and that I should be taken off the air. Their latest article was, America has a free speech problem in the New York Times on Friday because they don't want us discussing the future of the world.

This website is almost offensively biased, and Alex knows that. He gets his news from aggressively pro-Putin sites and espouses strictly pro-Putin messaging while hiding behind this facade that he's exploring both sides.

Anyway, the point here is that there's more to this story than the way Alex is reporting it. It's important when you're doing these kinds of gun martyrdom presentations that you present the central character as being as blameless as possible. There's no room for nuance because you need it to be black and white, an open and shut case where the person is having their guns taken for no reason, and the state's actions are solely motivated by a tyrannical desire to take everyone's guns. That's why when Alex does decide to touch on why the raid happened, here's how he puts it. And DC says they're going to throw the book at him. All because a disgruntled family member dropped a dime on him. That's what tyrannies are like. It was a disgruntled family member who dropped a dime, not an estranged wife in the middle of an ugly divorce who alleged this dude had threatened her multiple times with a gun. Recognizing that would cast too much of a shadow on this story and risk making the gun martyr not look as blameless as he needs to look for this kind of narrative to work.

To Alex's perception, it very well may seem like every scenario-based exercise that law enforcement or the National Guard does involves maligning people like himself. But that perception isn't based on reality. It's the product of him taking in only extreme right-wing news, where the only time he ever hears a story reported about scenario training exercises, it's someone crying bloody murder about how a fictitious right-wing domestic terror group is part of the exercise in question. All the other ones, scenarios based around natural disasters or accidents, scenarios where the threat is a left-wing group, scenarios where the villain is a nondescript foreign terror group. All of these don't exist in Alex's reporting because he doesn't know or doesn't care that they exist. The media that he's taking in drives home the message he wants to hear, and he in turn repeats and solidifies that message to his audience as if it's the product of research when it's just regurgitating bullshit that he skimmed on Drudge.

It's the product of him taking in only extreme right-wing news, where the only time he ever hears a story reported about scenario training exercises, it's someone crying bloody murder about how a fictitious right-wing domestic terror group is part of the exercise in question. All the other ones, scenarios based around natural disasters or accidents, scenarios where the threat is a left-wing group, scenarios where the villain is a nondescript foreign terror group. All of these don't exist in Alex's reporting because he doesn't know or doesn't care that they exist. The media that he's taking in drives home the message he wants to hear, and he in turn repeats and solidifies that message to his audience as if it's the product of research when it's just regurgitating bullshit that he skimmed on Drudge.

It's really bad, and the only reason you report on something like this, let alone lead your program with it, is if you're trying to find ways to make Putin look good. Like, sure, he's bombing civilian targets and waging an unnecessary war of aggression, but secretly he's trying to shut down these U.S.-run biological weapons labs, man. He's creating a heroic story for his listeners to accept so they don't get the idea in their head that Putin is bad. I'm not sure if Alex thinks he's being subtle about this, but it actually seems hard to imagine a way he could be more insidiously trying to get his audience to support Putin while trying to couch his commentary and like... I don't know, plausible deniability.

He's got this whole thing going about how Klaus Schwab is going to do a false flag cyber attack, so if Alex accidentally reads a headline about Putin considering a cyber attack, he's going to have to immediately invalidate it or run the risk of weakening his Schwab narrative. In order to keep his own bullshit afloat, Alex is essentially required to give Putin passes on a whole lot of stuff. He has to pretend to not know a lot of stuff, and he has to lie about a ton of stuff. That's kind of... Where he's constrained by his own machinations.

Tricking ridiculous. I mean, they attack me in hundreds of newspapers a day. Dozens of TV shows a day. National shows every week. I can't even keep track of it. It's just everywhere. Alex Jones is Satan. Because they see me as a representation of everything they hate about America. A strong, honorable man who's a father who believes in freedom and has rallied to people and has survived their attacks for decades.