Today, Dan and Jordan trace Alex's positions in the days prior to Russia invading Ukraine, compared to what he says after the fact. Also, Roger Stone still needs money for fake lawsuits and Alex is mad that CNN is doing a special about him. Citations
and I I am very confused by Alex's uh behavior and his narratives over the course of this week it does not make sense I told you this before we started recording I don't know exactly what his point is about almost anything.
Yeah.
unidentified
But I do know little pieces of it as we go along, and we can track it and hopefully make sense of it by the time we finish up.
Russia has already been in an eight-year proxy war with the globalists, and the West began to move heavy weapons in in the last few years.
They accelerated under Biden.
And so Putin has put a bunch of troops on the border saying you need to not...
We need to stop heavy weapons shipments.
And we need to have a major armistice, demilitarization, ceasefire meeting under their Donetsk, if I pronounce that right, compact of several years ago.
So we can just go ahead and say right off the bat that at this point Alex is taking literally everything Putin says as gospel and he's backing Russia 100%.
Yeah.
It's good to get that out of the way so we don't have to keep coming back to it as we go through.
One of the things I found most interesting about that clip, though, is the idea that a country could be in a proxy war against the globalists.
That seems like an absurd concept, but it's something that Alex just casually tosses around like it's a perfectly normal idea and that it's stupid to think anything else could possibly be going on.
Alex doesn't even have a solid, consistent group of people who actually make up the globalists.
So I have no faith that he could explain this proxy war if he were forced to, like if I had a follow-up question for him.
So something that was really funny in that clip, though, is the part where Alex says that the West has been aggressing on Russia for a few years now, then realizes that would mean that it started under Trump.
So he has to immediately qualify that it ramped up under Biden.
The Minsk Agreements are two formal attempts to stop the fighting that's gone on in the Donbass region, which have both been unsuccessful.
The first was the Minsk Protocol in 2014, followed by Minsk II in 2015.
The goal of these agreements was to put in place a ceasefire between the Ukrainian military and the Russian-backed separatist groups in Donetsk and Luhansk, who have decided that their own breakaway states and not a part of Ukraine.
Right.
unidentified
The dynamics of this agreement are super complicated because you have to look at it from, like, you just have to look at the status of the parties from each other's viewpoints.
And when you do, you kind of get a sense of how this was probably doomed to failure.
According to most of the world, this was essentially an agreement between Ukraine and Russia, since the separatist groups in Donbass wouldn't be able to continue any of their actions without Russian backing.
It's not really necessary to say that separatists in Donetsk need to withdraw heavy weapons, since without Russia they wouldn't have heavy weapons.
But from Russia's standpoint, this is a negotiation between Ukraine and the separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk.
They've routinely taken the position that they're just observers and that they're there to mediate the process, and they don't exist as a party of the agreement.
Putin sees himself as unbound from the agreement itself, at least partially for this reason.
At the same time, Ukraine specifically sees this as a negotiation between themselves and Russia, and the Ukrainian president Zelensky has even said that he has, quote, no intention of talking to terrorists, and it is just impossible for me in my position.
His perspective on the agreement is similar to how much of the world sees it, as a conversation between Ukraine and the Russian government who are facilitating the actions of the separatist groups in Donbass, who the Ukrainian government see essentially as an insurgency.
So you can see from the perspectives of all of them that negotiating tape will be very difficult to navigate based on perceptions and how they see each other linking up.
So there was an inherent lack of agreement in this agreement, and it collapsed almost immediately with the accusations from both sides that the other side had broken the ceasefire.
So I don't know what the Donetsk Compact is.
Alex doesn't know anything about the Minsk agreements, but is making a passing reference to them to justify Russia's actions now, because he's invested in defending everything Putin does.
Alex has built him up as the only major geopolitical force that stands against his imaginary enemies, so whenever it looks like the rubber is gonna meet the road, Alex is gonna be on Team Putin, and he'll use whatever flimsy grasp he has on history or past agreements to convince his audience that they should be too.
And it's a global corporate war against humanity designed to have a controlled implosion of society to then carry out their endgame or their destination, their goal, 80-90% depopulation of the Earth.
Their official documents say 80 to 90 percent going back to the 60s.
And these are the groups that created the Bilderberg Group, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission.
It's all the same group.
They're the capture, elite capture groups, the corporate capture groups that you know of as the Davos Group.
So Alex does some stupid killing of time here, and this is something that I always find very interesting, and I don't think I'll ever ignore when it comes up.
We're going into World War IV that is economic, that is psychological, that is cyber, that is radiological, that is electromagnetic, that is chemical, that is covert.
Silent weapons, silent weapons for quiet wars.
Silent weapons for quiet wars.
Just look these terms up.
And it's what the globalists are obsessed with, and they brag how you're dumb animals, and they brag how they're going to annihilate you, and how they're going to slowly take all your resources, but make you love it while they brainwash you using Pavlovian behavioral psychology.
These are the worst villains the Earth has ever seen.
It does get into, you know, you like the judge in the Blood Meridian, but if the judge were actually alive, you'd be like, I gotta get away from the devil.
So, Alex has seen a meme, and I come to realize, I know we've probably brought this up before, A lot of Alex's reporting is just based on memes he's seen.
And particularly when we're sitting here talking about the period where tensions are really high, discussion of a potential invasion are going on, when you're reporting stuff that has to do with Ukraine based on a meme.
So this is a great example of the information that Alex disseminates and why it can't be trusted, even when he shows a video.
Because he does.
He shows the video of this.
He's playing this video, and it's of police dropping their shields into a pile, just as he's describing, but the context of the situation is completely different than what he's saying.
He either saw this posted as a meme somewhere with a false story attached to it, or he saw the video and decided to make up his own plot about what he wanted to imagine this was.
This was not from COVID times.
It's actually a video from 2014.
It was filmed in Slovyansk, a city in East Ukraine.
There had been skirmishes in the city between Ukrainian government forces and the pro-Russian separatists, and at the point of the video being shot, the police had detained some of the separatists.
The video depicts a crowd of people threatening the police, the police realizing they're outnumbered, and them dropping their shields and leaving.
So the thing I find really interesting is how much of the story Alex is telling has to do with his own imagination and how he's come up with detailed motives for the people in the video.
He's sure that they talked about how they were going to do this in advance to make a statement about COVID measures.
It's all just the product of him seeing a video and then deciding how he wants to make up a story about it to sell the audience.
Yeah, and he's written an entire high school basketball movie where they're all in the locker room getting together and there's some guy giving a big speech about how clear eyes, no vaccines can't lose, that kind of shit.
Vladimir Putin is set to address the world sometime in the next hour.
We'll see what he's going to announce.
Probably that there have been Western attacks on Russian-held areas in Eastern Ukraine, that he is going to take those sectors.
Or perhaps it's that he's going to give them an ultimatum for NATO to say that they're not going to take Ukraine and they will stop shipping heavy weapons into their border, sectors, or that he's going to invade.
Clearly, this has all been done to put pressure on expansionist NATO to get them to back down and recognize Russia's legitimate security concerns.
But the globalists hate God, so they love war.
They hate God, so they hate families.
And they hate Russia because Russia is now having a multi-child policy, just like China.
And he's giving the prediction right out of the gate that he's going to say that, you know, in the East Ukraine, he's gonna either annex these places or make an ultimatum about it.
So he's already preparing his audience to, like, accept that as, like, this is exactly what should happen.
Yeah, and so in order to lead up to this speech that Putin's giving, I noticed that Alex is doing just a lot of water carrying for the Russian government.
Well, maybe not everybody's gonna get arrested, but in the past years, there have been widely reported purges and arrests of people who are either gay or suspected.
In 2013, the government instituted a bill that they said was aimed at stopping, quote, gay propaganda, which has been used to target activists and repressive voices who would speak up for the community.
The first same-sex marriage recognized in Russia between two men married in Denmark was quickly unrecognized, and then the men fled the country for fear for their lives.
Over 100 gay men were rounded up and tortured in Chechnya in 2017, which the Russian government doesn't even deem worth investigating.
What Alex is saying is bullshit, and he knows it, but he also knows that he can't allow the picture he paints of Putin to be one of someone who's harshly repressing people based on sexual identity or orientation.
Thus, Alex decides to just pretend that every instance of targeting of the LGBTQ activists is secretly them detaining a CIA agent.
But also probably part of the reason Alex has to play the game that he is doing there is because if he was going to be honest about the gay propaganda law that Russia has passed, he would need to explain to his audience how it's okay for the state to curtail free speech to this drastic of an extent, and why there isn't a real serious problem for a free speech warrior like himself, or why protests are...
on in Russia.
All the things that he thinks are essential elements of quote-unquote Western culture are not carried out and respected by Putin.
And he can't accept that or sell that to the audience, so you deny it.
As we speak, Vladimir Putin has just taken the podium, and here on the Alex Jones Show, we're going to go to this announcement by the Russian leader about the ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe in the proxy war that is Ukraine.
Here it is.
unidentified
Of course, my address is also aimed at our fellow citizens in Ukraine.
We'll have to have a substantive and detailed conversation because the matter is very serious.
His actions really indicate a very real reverence and respect that Alex feels towards Putin, and it was probably the longest I've seen him play a video without jumping in.
It went on over multiple segments.
Even with Trump speeches, he'd often cut in to double down or say something to do damage control, but with this...
He was just airing a straight feed from Russian TV to Infowars.
I mean, you could say, in a way, it was a modern leader being very honest in a sense that they were revealing that they're a psychopathic supervillain ready to invade a country because they want territory.
And it was honest in as much as, especially with the gift of hindsight that we have from a few days later, and I think you could hear a lot of people echoing this even on Monday, that this was...
Yeah, I mean, maybe he doesn't sleep very much, but it's not like after he eats dinner at an absurdly long table with whomever, you know, he goes down.
And he's like, now I'm in my man cave with a nice comfy chair ready to listen to Alex fucking Jones.
He was not saying that he was going to get rid of communism, which is the way Alex is reporting that comment.
What he was saying is that the people of Ukraine are moving past their Soviet past and smashing statues of Lenin, but Putin says if you want to do that, go all the way and revert your borders back to what they were before 1922 when Ukraine joined the Soviet Union.
This is actually a very scary and brazen comment that has implications for all the former Soviet member states.
There's an underlying premise here that in order to actually leave the Soviet Union, you need to go out exactly as you came in.
And if your borders are different than when they were previously, he has the right to take that land, because it's actually still Russia's to him.
It should be pretty obvious why this mentality could be a problem for a whole host of states in the region, and Alex does not seem to be willing to understand what is being said here.
There's like levels of reading comprehension where it's like you can understand a book or like you can understand a chapter or you can understand a page or a paragraph or a sentence and all Alex gets is a word.
But he even fucks that up.
Well, yeah, but I mean he heard decommunize and he was like, that's...
He's thinking that it means a complete rejection and abandonment of communism.
That may be a part of it, but it's actually a term that refers to the states that were formerly part of the Soviet Union moving away from their time as a part of that group, oftentimes by way of purges of people who were involved in the Communist Party.
The things that Alex is saying are the characterizations of what he imagines the word means, like having kids and being free market or fighting the globalists.
I bring this point up for two reasons.
The first is that Alex seems to be really hanging his hat on that misinterpretation and he keeps bringing it up.
The second is that it really illustrates how much of Alex's reporting in geopolitical analysis is based on him making assumptions and then writing storylines based on those assumptions.
It's a really unreliable method for reporting.
When Putin discusses his dislike of Stalin and Lenin and the Communist Party, he isn't saying that he doesn't like them for the same reasons Alex does.
If you actually listen to the whole speech, it's super clear that he doesn't like them because he blames them for breaking up the Soviet Union.
Quote, It is now that radicals and nationalists, including primarily those in Ukraine, are taking credit for having gained independence.
As we can see, this is absolutely wrong.
The disintegration of our united country was brought about by the historic strategic mistakes on the part of the Bolshevik leaders and the CPSU leadership.
Mistakes committed at different times in state building and in economic and ethnic policies.
The collapse of the historical Russia known as the USSR is on their conscience.
Also, I think it would be a real stretch to say that he was apologizing for anything, even that the predecessors did.
This is the state that Alex is in during the early week.
He's fully cheerleading on Putin.
He's saying he's a fount of truth and that he can find no fault in him as a leader.
Alex is fully aware that Putin is most likely going to, in some way or another, annex the Donbas region, and Alex is completely in support of that.
He's bought the Kremlin line that this action would be taken to defend Russian speakers in the region, which is the consistent pretext that Putin uses to take hostile actions against his neighbors, and Alex has every reason to know that.
But then, on Wednesday night, the status quo changed dramatically and Russia declared war against Ukraine.
Mm-hmm.
Mm-hmm.
The turn of events is not unfathomable, but it's far more extreme than most people seem to have expected, and I'll admit that even though I'm no expert on the region, so don't take my word as anything meaningful, but from everything I've read and seen, I was not expecting anything on this scale.
It's ultimately not the most important piece in all of this, but because this is a show about Alex Jones, it should be pointed out that Alex was also entirely wrong about his assessment of the situation.
He completely whiffed on his interpretation of Putin's speech on Monday and used that misrepresentation and misinterpretation to justify Putin's subsequent actions that led to the invasion of Ukraine.
As is pretty much always the case, Alex is painfully wrong because he created his narratives by combining uncritical acceptance of hostile government propaganda with figments of his imagination.
But that leaves us to pick up the pieces on Thursday.
Now that Ukraine has been invaded and Alex's entire week's charade has collapsed around him, how is he going to proceed?
And more importantly, how will he pretend that he's been right all along?
That's the question we ask ourselves as we enter...
Yeah, you know, I mean, he's wrong about everything in the early week, but it does seem like he's cheering for, like, minimal loss of life at least.
You know, I mean, he's saying, fine, you can take your regions and shit, and maybe it's right, and all of that stuff is good, but the end point is, we're not going to start a fucking war.
Well, we don't have to come in with our own canned air raid sirens from during the Cold War.
We got real air raid sirens in 2022.
As thousands of bombs get dropped on military targets across the birthplace of the Slavic people's Ukraine, Russia jealously does not want towards Soros to have it for himself, so Russia's grabbing it.
Not only you didn't say this was going to happen, you interpreted Putin's words in a way to suggest that, oh, this is all cool, what he's doing is great, and now there's an invasion that's happening, and now you're interpreting these words in a completely...
Well, I mean, listen, I don't think it's good that you can take over an entire country, but Soros has taken it over, so it's really taking it from Soros, not really taking over a country.
I mean, that's how you inchworm take over a population.
In war, you never tell people what you're really planning to do.
You're going to get the inside scoop, the best analysis there is out there.
You can read the New York Times.
They say Biden's done a great job.
This is wonderful.
You can tune in to the BBC and hear that Putin's the new Hitler.
Or you can tune in here and actually really understand the history of things and make your own decision about where all this is going, but all hell is breaking loose.
So here's a few clips of yours truly back in October and November of last year.
So you just play some clips of himself talking shit about how there's going to be a war and such, which I think at any period in his career you could come up with clips of him saying...
Yeah, and one of them I do remember is in the context of him talking about being out with Joe Rogan and some other of Joe's friends and then talking shit about how there was going to be a war.
It's just strange for him to be bragging and sort of pumping up his own chest when he's living in the aftermath of his own failure, more or less, in terms of information.
So that line about the enemy, you know, they're attacking me because I stand between you and them is such a powerful and toxic line for propagandists to use because it achieves two really potent goals.
The first is that it creates a centralized point that the followers need to support to the point of considering the survival and well-being of that central point.
If Alex Jones or Trump is all that stands between you and certain globalist onslaught, then it's in your best interest to do everything you can to protect them so you don't get onslaughted.
This hustle is perfect because it works no matter what, because the dreaded onslaught is imaginary.
As long as you're in business and siphoning off support from your scared audience, you're doing your job and holding back this imagined army.
And if you go out of business or die, then it doesn't matter if that onslaught doesn't actually come because you aren't in a position to exploit the audience's fear anymore.
So the second thing that this tactic achieves is to obscure and essentially sideline any legitimate criticism of this centralized point.
Alex is a complete liar and a noted piece of shit in just about every aspect of his life that we have any information about, but none of that really matters if he's the only thing holding back this imaginary army.
Trump is a lifelong con man who treated the US government as his tool to exploit for his own agenda and self-interest, but...
If he's all that stands between you and this imaginary army, does that really matter?
Putin's troops raise Russian flag in Ukraine as Z-tanks.
Which have come from the east, and O-tanks that come from Belarus, enter deeper into the nation.
And there is no real resistance, because just like the U.S. bought off the Iraqi leadership in Gulf War I and Gulf War II, 90 plus percent of their generals, you see that Putin has already done his work.
First, it's wrong in the sense that it's a complete contradiction of everything Alex was reporting and predicting earlier in the week, and at no point is Alex taking stock of how wrong he was and how he was supporting Putin directly in the lead-up to this.
The second way this is wrong is that Alex is making up everything about Putin paying off Ukrainian troops and there being no resistance.
There's been a ton of fighting with Russian air units shot down and ground fighting taking place in multiple hotspots, not just in Donbass.
Just one example of this is fighting that's taking place at the Gostomel Airfield.
Russian paratroopers came in and took over, and they were confronted by Ukrainian troops.
And as I was preparing this episode, the outcome was still unknown.
Yeah, I saw something about that just before we started recording.
Alex is reporting this complete fabrication because he needs this to be true to emotionally disconnect himself from the fact that he was part of a media chorus in the United States that cheered on and actively promoted the lead-up to an invasion that is now killing civilians and causing widespread fighting in an invaded sovereign country.
Alex supported the thing his brand is all about pretending to be against all because he's blinded by his imagination that Putin listens to his stupid show and is an ally against his protagonists enemies.
unidentified
Alex cheered on something that is at best an attempt to overthrow a neighboring country's government and at worst an attempt to take the whole thing over.
So in his head, this is just a situation where Putin's bought off the Ukrainian military and is marching in uncontested.
Yeah.
unidentified
It's not a situation where civilians are hunkering down in subway stations for shelter, where shells are hitting residential areas and where Russian troops are attacking far more than the Donbass region, which is the flimsy pretext that Alex bought from the Kremlin and sold to his audience.
Also, if France was bought off to let Germany just come in, sure, a lot of French people die for no reason.
I think what Alex is talking about is that they entered Paris unopposed, but that was because the French army had already taken a gigantic hit by that point, and the French government had fled from Paris.
That's one of the historical things that contributes to the whole right-wing joke about French people loving to surrender.
They claimed, oh, we're just going to protect these zones, and then, oh, we're just going to rout out the Nazis, which, I mean, how does the left say no to that?
Do a little soul searching about how you went on air repeatedly, parroted those lies, and also said, this is the most truthful person that I have ever seen, the greatest world leader in terms of just given the truth, just facts.
So there's a real interesting change of tone from previous days.
It's not yelling about how Putin was so full of truth and the most straight-up leader in the world who Alex can't find fault with, who just wanted to protect Russians in Donbass.
It's taking Ukraine so Soros can't have it.
And Alex doesn't seem like he is offended by that notion.
Also, Alex is full of shit about it being 50-50 in Ukraine about joining with Russia or the West.
A Center for Insight and Research poll from December 2021 asked, quote, if Ukraine was able to enter only one international economic union, which one of the following should it be?
58% said the EU, compared to 21% who said, quote, Customs Union with Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan.
Another poll from 2021 reflected 64% support among Ukrainians for joining NATO, compared to 19% who opposed it.
Right.
unidentified
Alex is trying to create the impression that the issue is split down the middle because it lends greater credibility to the side that's far down in the polls, Yeah, it's climate denialism as a...
Beyond my capabilities of assessing what's going to happen outside of information that is in front of me at this point.
But in terms of Alex, how is tomorrow's news today when today's news is a direct contradiction of yesterday's news?
I don't understand how that works.
Today's news demonstrates that Alex was making shit up yesterday, so if you're listening to him, you should probably recognize that tomorrow is probably going to be the time when you realize he was making shit up today.
It's important to understand that this stuff about a fake invasion and Zelensky being a double agent is rationalization.
Alex is worried that this conflict is going to escalate and end up turning into a wider war, and he knows that he's been way too public in his support for Putin.
If things continue and Russia continues to aggress on their neighbors, Alex's business model can't survive being a media mouthpiece for the enemy.
His brand works when he's talking shit and sounding like he knows everything.
It's not good when he's getting into Lord HaHa or straight up Father Coughlin territory.
This rationalization also helps Alex pivot away from overt Putin cheerleading without having to accept the consequences.
If things do get worse, he can say that after Putin went into Ukraine, he stopped cheering him on and that Ukraine was a false flag war where there wasn't even any fighting and the double agent president surrendered for money.
This allows Alex to avoid feeling bad about the people who died in the invasion, which he supported and promoted because he's an emotional and intellectual coward.
I mean, you know, it's easy to say that any comparison to World War II is in totality, but I am just describing the amount of propaganda and support that is being pushed.
The fact that the Russians are taking over all the nuclear power plants.
And coal power plants.
And gas plants.
And they're taking over the government buildings and the airports.
And then some of the military people I know say, yeah, I've seen the footage.
It looked like a bunch of young 18-year-old Russians, you know, that aren't even special operations, dragging rocket launchers around.
And no one's opposing them.
This looks fake.
This is a real war.
Well, that's because it's all a big drill.
The Ukrainian military was bought off.
And so now we'll see what happens with their puppet president.
A lot of times puppets end up getting hung, but we'll see what goes on.
But this is all directly because of globalist leftist Western forces.
With all their transgenderism and all of their pregnant flight suits and all of their CRT in the military and all this, the entire world thinks we're a complete joke now.
Alex is such an idiot and he's so caught up in his own narratives that the literal invasion of a sovereign country has to somehow be related to his bigot culture war obsessions.
It's really remarkable how little of substance he has to say and how much he retreats to these things he's completely making up, like the war is fake, and things that are really just muscle memory bigot culture war memes that he makes money spread It's...
Pathetic.
I don't know any other words.
He should really have a boss to give him a performance review.
I mean, that is an element that I've seen repeatedly come up that is an undercurrent of a lot of support for Russia on this one, is that we hate trans people too.
I mean, it's deep set.
There's so many little arguments I've seen that are like...
And we've got trans people.
And you're like, what are we fucking talking about?
I'm telling you, where Putin has miscalculated, and I guess he just doesn't care he's got nuclear weapons, is that they're going to cut the power off in areas and pull a bunch of shenanigans and blame it on Putin.
You can bet your ass on that, okay?
That is the default move here.
A false flag to be blamed on the Russians.
And the Russians...
It looks like taking the bait to me.
I would not have done what Putin did.
I know he thinks it's their country, their people.
Putin has paid off the Ukrainian military to stand down, thanks to some involvement from the double agent President Zelensky, and is going to end up taking over Ukraine.
I guess that Ukraine is now in on the whole thing, but the international globalists who still don't like Putin are going to do some false flag where they cut off the power, maybe in Ukraine or something, and blame Putin for reasons that I don't really understand.
I don't get what the game plan is here.
If the rest of the stuff Alex is saying is to believe...
I don't really know how this would be a meaningful part of the story.
I just don't have, you know, it is a little bit, maybe I'm a little jealous, you know, because I don't have that level of confidence and psychopathic ability to just declare that I did something right.
You know, especially not if I didn't.
Even if I did something well, I'm terrible at being like, hey man, that was all me and I would like all of the credit.
So, one thing that did bother me, and that that was that in one of the so-called unaligned regions where the Russians have already taken control, they're starting to force people of the Jewish faith to register.
If Alex hadn't done a very out-of-character follow-up question, Roger would have been allowed to claim on air as fact that Jewish people were being forced to register in one of the parts of the Donbass region.
Because Alex asked if it was true, which is, again, bizarre for him.
Since Roger doesn't specify, I'm left to speculate about what he's talking about, and the best I can do is that in 2014 there were flyers that people found in East Ukraine that said Jewish people over 16 had to register with the Comisar.
These were terrifying, obviously, but also they appear to have been a hoax with neither the Ukrainian nor the pro-Russian separatist side clearly being behind the distribution.
Some believe that it was possibly an extortion racket that some splinter groups of the separatists are trying to get going, but it's hard to say for sure.
That said, this was news from the last invasion, but all the same...
This is a super serious allegation that Roger is just throwing around.
If he's going to act like that, he needs more to back it up than some random thing he may have heard that he doesn't even know if it's true or not.
Also, the whole shot down helicopters thing would seem to contradict Alex's earlier point about the Ukrainian military just being paid off by Putin, but yet, I don't see him retracting that or correcting himself or wrestling with how he was wrong.
I also think you should take the realization that Biden was right a little harder than he is.
Okay, so all the people who go to the World Economic Forum...
Obviously.
They can become a member, and if you choose, about 10% of those who become members are taken to their underground brainwashing center, where they are hooked into a chair, E and F on the temples.
So this is just cherry-picked bullshit that Alex is reporting based on a meme that was posted on Twitter by former NHL player and current conspiracy peddler Theo Fleury.
If you recall, he was one of the people who was originally peddling the million truck nonsense on Fox News in the lead-up to the Ottawa occupation, and I guess that brand was lucrative for him, so he's doubling down on the World Economic Forum stuff.
He posted a meme that wasn't even about Western European leaders, but of people in the Canadian federal government who are, quote, listed on worldeconomicforum.org slash people.
That page is blank, and it has been in all the captures on the Wayback Machine going back to 2016, so I'm not sure how anyone would even go about checking this list, but even assuming that all the people he has on there have attended Davos, that proves nothing, and it has nothing to do with Western Europe.
Also, not to split hairs here needlessly, but...
Most people who have breakdowns of world regions, they consider Spain and Portugal to be in Southern Europe, not in Western Europe.
This is a dumb meme that Alex saw.
He decided it was groundbreaking.
He thought he should write a news story about it before reporting on it.
What I would describe as internally inconsistent narratives about Ukraine on the 24th that all fly in stark contrast to the nonsense he was doing at the beginning of the week.
That the borders of Ukraine are the most holy thing in the world and that the Russians shouldn't be there when the people controlling and running our country when the very sovereignty of our nation is being erased in front of the planet.
And here's the bottom line.
It isn't just that they don't care and broke the border.
It's that the globalist UN have told the third world to come here.
They have shut down the third world.
They've been in years of lockdowns to then flush them up here to be now political pawns, a new permanent underclass of the globalist, making us the third world.
Not to empower the third world, but to permanently use these masses of people they've been exploiting as an invasion force that they control.
You can see here that Alex essentially has nothing to say about the situation in Ukraine.
This is very clearly an attempt to shift the focus into a subject matter that he's much more comfortable yelling about, namely, his racist Great Replacement conspiracies.
This doesn't even merit response, because the situations he's describing aren't analogous in any way.
Instead, I'm playing this clip solely to demonstrate one of the ways that Alex's coverage works.
He's throwing so much shit at the wall because he has no idea what's going on, but he's still expected to be the guy who knows everything.
This manifests first at the beginning of the week as his supposed deep wisdom about Russian history and how Putin is so right that there's a need to defend Russian speakers in Donbass.
Alex fully understands Putin because he's an info warrior, and Putin just wants free market and prosperity for the people to have kids in the West who can survive and thrive.
Then that falls apart when Putin invades Ukraine, so Alex needs a new story.
This largely takes the form of Alex making up that there's no Ukrainian resistance and that Putin paid off Ukraine, including the double agent President Zelensky.
Alex knows that this isn't going to fly, and by this point in the show, I'm sure one of his interns is telling him that there's fighting in multiple locations around Ukraine, and Alex even let slip that there were Russian helicopters down.
That narrative isn't going to last, but it was a first try to make a further conspiracy out of the situation that he could use in the future.
With that failing, he needs another distraction, because without distractions...
It's really too obvious that Ukraine is under attack, and Alex reported completely false information that made his audience support the actions that led up to it.
The perfect distraction here is exactly what Alex is doing.
His arguments have failed, his information is shown to be bullshit, so the last refuge he really has is just to point to his racist Great Replacement obsessions and say, why should I care about their border when we're not fighting to defend our border?
It's essentially a white flag in terms of the whole narrative building exercise here.
And maybe a white nationalist flag would be more appropriate in terms of this, but the point is that...
Yeah, if he's pulling this out, Alex doesn't have shit.
This indication of giving up kind of even started earlier in the show, where he was trying to say that acceptance of trans people in the United States somehow led to this, but this is where his resignation is really crystal clear.
Maybe he'll have something more to say at a later day, or someone will feed him some information during a...
That was sort of earlier in the episode, a little bit of a lash out, kind of.
But when he's sitting here saying, why do we care about Ukraine when our southern border, they're flooding an invasion force of third world populations, that's giving up.
Yeah, if I move in on your doorstep, and I just say, I'm going to live on your porch now, and then I aim a machine gun at you when you walk out your door every day, it's actually true.
If you finally walked out and punched the dude in the face that aims a machine gun at you, you're the aggressor.
So you can see Alex is becoming more and more pro-Putin as Biden speaks, because Alex's politics and his perspective, it isn't anchored to anything other than opposition.
His only coherent perspective is to be against the positions that are expressed by his imagined enemies.
So as soon as Biden is giving a speech saying that Putin is the aggressor here, Alex has to deny that and go on his knee-jerk rant, even after saying earlier in the show that Biden was right about this situation.
That Putin is taking the whole country.
Yep.
Pure and simple, this is an emotional outburst on Alex's part.
He doesn't even really mean the things he's saying, I don't think.
and the shit that's coming out of his mouth contradicts the things he was saying earlier in the show, but it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter because the product he's selling the audience isn't analysis.
It's an emotional experience.
The emotional experience of pretending to yell down Biden and shut him down, you liar.
It's the emotional experience of pretending to know secret information that no one else has.
It's the emotional experience of being proven right, even when all the things that are happening are the opposite of what you predicted.
I mean, if what you're selling people is secret special knowledge that makes them smarter than everybody else, more powerful than everybody else, and, I mean, who cares what's real?
You know, isn't that such, like, you know they'll never do it.
It's never gonna happen.
This is such a simple moment of like, you're going to listen to everything Putin says, even though Biden's right, you're still going to side with Putin just because, just because.
So Alex is a liar, and this clip is deceptively edited to make it sound like Pelosi thinks Ukraine is hungry.
He achieves this by cutting off what he had said just prior to that clip starting.
Quote, I had the privilege of sitting next to the president of Latvia for most of the plenary sessions, and others have...
Others there were very concerned about what would be next.
Right.
unidentified
When she mentions Hungary as well as Poland and Romania, she's referencing countries that were of concern to NATO members about states that could be in trouble if Russia took over Ukraine.
Alex either knows this and is playing the clip deceptively, or he never even took the time to find context and is just desperate to play a clip that seems to show someone he doesn't like misspeaking, which I guess is a huge win for the Infowar.
And that's the feeling.
He wants to spread this feeling of Nancy Pelosi doesn't even know what countries are what.
And it also doesn't, like, obviously he plays that clip of Klaus Schwab and he's just saying that, like, it's something to be concerned about.
And that if there were widespread cyber attacks, it could be something that would be more damaging societally and more disruptive than the COVID lockdowns.
Leaving that aside, like I mentioned earlier, you don't need a lured-in invasion of Ukraine to be like, hey, we gotta be worried Russia might have a cyberattack plan of some sort.
That is a completely unnecessary middle step along the way.
It makes no sense for the larger storyline.
Nope.
It's just Alex trying to find ways to rationalize, like, how am I going to move forward with this?
I forgot to play this Out of Context drop at the beginning of the show, and I think it would have been really funny at the beginning of the show, so I'm just going to play it now.