In this installment, Dan and Jordan checkin to see how Alex covered the release of Tucker Carlson's interview with Putin. As it turns out, he decides to spend most of him time getting into a fight with David Icke about Elon Musk. Click here for tickets for our upcoming tour dates
You were telling me about how rough last night was, like, in terms of your body and what have you, and I know that, like, the only context I have is when I got the food poisoning recently, and I know that the next day I was like, I'm thrilled to be alive, because there were moments, and I'm sure you're kind of having the same, like, existential You know, any night, any night you are asleep on the bathroom floor is not a good night.
And plot twist, we're recording this on Zencaster as opposed to on our normal workflow, so I don't have all of the clips that I normally have access to, so I'm going to skip the wonks shout-outs for today.
So we have, on our last episode, we went over the Tucker Putin interview, and I thought, well, obviously what we need to do now is check in and see Alex's response to it, because we've had our time to sit with the episode, we heard Alex's promotional excitement prior to the interview, and now we can see, how did he take it?
No, and they all had the same kind of reaction of, I watched clips of it, which, as we talked about in our last episode, completely boggles my mind, you know?
Unless the journalists were specifically like, You're assigned to write about this.
Everyone saw a little, you know, I saw a little bit here and there, and then I was like, I got it, and then didn't watch it.
You know, on Twitter, they have like a number of views and stuff like that, but that doesn't guarantee the number of people that watched all the way through it.
So, Biden's had some gaffes, and there's reason to be concerned about some of that stuff, because he's 81 years old.
That's how Trump's a mess with these gaffes, too, and Alex just ignores all of them, because they don't help his end of things.
I'm a little confused, though.
Like, I thought Biden already couldn't talk.
Alex has been saying that since as soon as, like, the 2020 election got going, but now it's, like, a future thing?
That's weird.
Also, apparently, these doctors who are drugging him up, are they in charge of the soft coup, or are they working for the people who are running the soft coup?
So as for the Putin commentary there, it seems like Alex's main point is that everybody is jealous that Putin gets to be a dick.
The two main points he brings up are that Putin rules unilaterally and he has artificially high approval ratings, both hallmarks of undemocratic rule.
And Alex is saying that all journalists love him, but did he not listen to the end of that interview where Tucker tried to negotiate the release of an imprisoned American journalist?
That seems like it's very, it doesn't match, doesn't feel right.
Like, I genuinely, because the more I read about it, like, after we did the episode, I was reading a bunch of, you know, trying to absorb as much as I could, because, again, it feels so crazy to me that no one cares, you know?
And then, like, the best thing I saw was from the Russian perspective, I guess, Putin's goal wasn't to, like...
Mess with American policy so much as it was to embarrass an American journalist and make himself look super strong.
You could embarrass him and still serve some of those goals of, you know, coalescing the right around Trump and around the push to get out of NATO and stuff.
The National World War II Museum has the number of Soviet troops killed in the war between 8.8 and 10.7 million, and Germany at 5,533,000.
Those are big numbers, but China also lost between 3 to 4 million troops, Japan about 2.1 million.
And what can Alex possibly mean by saying that the U.S. and the Allied countries were at the kids' table, while also saying that he doesn't want to downplay the number of U.S. soldiers killed in the conflict?
That's precisely what he's doing.
He's downplaying the Allies in World War II, which seems weird.
The news of the interview hadn't come out until that Tuesday, and Alex has directly predicted that Tucker and Putin would be talking about the Bioweapon Lab conspiracies, which sounded like a decent prediction, and I said, yeah, probably.
Yeah, we heard about that prediction on our last episode from Alex's response to the news of this breaking on February 7th.
I don't know if Alex also predicted that Putin would do a boring history lesson at some point, but he definitely was wrong about the bioweapon lab thing.
It's unsurprising that we have him taking credit for nailing a prediction he may or may not have made while ignoring one he was definitely wrong about.
Then we have David Icke joining us for at least an hour and a half.
And I'm calling it a debate because we are going to debate some stuff, but it's a friendly debate.
I love David Icke.
A super great guy.
Super smart.
Really liked the guy.
And that's why when he's been kind of pinpecking me a little bit, and that's kind of what it's like, calling me the minion of Elon Musk and stuff, it hurts.
It's good to have David there criticizing Elon so that we can push him in the right direction and if he doesn't go in the right direction, you're exposing.
But when he's moving in our direction and doing all these good things, sure, you don't turn the lights off and trust Elon Musk.
Anybody with that much power you can't trust.
But I'm not going to complain when he's swinging like in 80% our direction.
While the entire conspiracy and right-wing dum-dum community is gleefully lining up supporting Elon Musk, Icke is blazing his own place in that ecosystem by being anti-Musk.
In November 2023, he put out an episode of his video podcast, The Dot Connector, called Here and No Further, The Alternative Media Hijack, where he argues that people like Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, Russell Brand, Tucker Carlson, and Joe Rogan are all members of what he calls the Barricade Brigade.
They're allowed by the powers that be to present themselves as free speech champions and alternative media figures, but they're actually just there to enforce a line where they can take the audience, but they can't go past.
He's complaining about how they're just saying things that he said 20 years ago and how they all interview each other and are all clicky, but they won't stand up for him when he got demonetized.
So, among this crowd, Elon Musk is a crusading hero of this brigade, barricade brigade, and that cannot be a coincidence in David Icke's mind.
It got personal earlier this month when David Icke tweeted, quote, Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Andrew Tate, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Joe Rogan, and then parentheses, long lost cause, Eva Vlardingberger, and all the rest of the Musk-worshipping mainstream alternative media.
When are you going to wake the fuck up and see what this man really is?
I despair at your naivete, and I'm being optimistic that it's all naivete.
There was no alternative media when I started out in 1990.
I watched it appear and grow, and now you're destroying it with your pathetic submission to this blatant asset of the very global cult you claim to oppose.
He then tagged everyone in that tweet, hoping to stir up some shit.
I do appreciate a certain amount of recognition of like, okay.
I am willing to say the real shit that you all believe, but you're afraid to say, which is exactly where you say everyone else is, and yet here we are.
His positioning makes a lot of sense, and I hate him, and I think he's a noxious person, but I get where he's coming from, and I think what he's doing is really smart.
When the conspiracy community builds someone up the way they have with Musk, it's only a matter of time until they tear him down, having discovered he was secretly evil all along.
David Icke is protecting his brand by being the guy who doesn't buy into this hype the same way that he was opposed to Trump for a while.
So, Alex didn't appreciate that tweet.
And tweeted back at him, quote, If CNN said come on next week and say whatever you want, I would.
You're on X as well and reaching a lot of people.
David didn't appreciate that response, so he replied, quote, Alex, mate, I don't understand this post.
I was asked to come on the show a couple weeks ago or so, and this was my reply to producer Daria on January 18th.
Daria, sorry for the delay, mate.
I'm working on and researching a book at the moment that is full-on head-down seven days all day coming up for air occasionally.
Can you ask me in early February and we'll see how I'm fixed then?
I should be on the other side of the deep stuff by that time.
Hope you're well.
All the best, David.
That still stands.
Not only do I want to discuss the Musk impact on the alternative media, it's important that these things are debated.
My problem is not with people using X while they can.
Of course not.
It's the hero worship of Musk and the way that it has stopped his cult serving views and activities being questioned on the scale that they would have been before.
So Alex kind of appreciated that, and he wrote back, quote, Great news!
And I think part of the part that makes it even really more difficult for Alex is that...
He has to recognize that David Icke has a good point.
Even with me saying I think David Icke sucks and he's crazy, I still think he's right about this, about all these people who are giving Elon a pass.
If that was his only criticism, then it would be like, yes, this is fine.
Of course, it spirals into a bunch of nonsense about brain takeovers and stuff like that.
Which we'll get to when David Icke comes on.
But, you know, if it were just left in the realm of the rational and the real world, David Icke would have a very valid criticism that Alex can't handle.
Yeah, I mean, that's, it's, he could just say his words, like, instead of bothering with saying them from myself, I'll just quote Alex, I'm bitter about you people doing the thing that I do and then getting more success out of it.
Yeah, David Icke is not welcome on those places, and so they have a little bit of a different perspective on things, even though they might both have a little bit of bitterness.
So Alex knows that David Icke is going to come on, and so in order to...
Prepare for this.
He needs to kind of equivocate a little bit about his feelings on Musk.
When somebody's fighting the globalists on so many fronts, and also double dealing, obviously, he's got a foot in both worlds, but he's moving way towards us.
I'm going to talk about the good, I see, and then criticize the bad, I see.
I don't think it's a...
David is a purist, which I think is good.
It's good to have him there as the guy that is going to really...
Focus on Musk, and it's good to have that position out there.
But I just cannot in good conscience myself sit here when I see the globalists literally coming after Musk.
He's devastating them.
And sure, he probably wants to take over the system.
He's just a competitor.
That's probably what it is.
Okay, he knows he's way smarter than them.
They're all twisted and inbred and out of control, and he's moving in on them.
That's how they see Trump, by the way.
They see Trump as a competitor.
There's an old saying, I think Frank Herbert wrote about it.
Old saying!
About 40 years old.
Every revolutionary is an aspiring aristocrat.
In that every revolutionary really just wants to be in power.
I think that's a cynical worldview because that's not how I am.
I want to see humanity empowered.
I want to see prosperity like the founders did.
But most revolutionaries, particularly their leftists, Do want to be the boss and do want to enslave people.
So here's the problem as it stands, and that is that just as Alex is saying that Musk has his feet in both worlds...
So does Alex.
Alex is enjoying the attention of associating with Musk and Rogan and being friends with Tucker and being on Tucker's show and Russell Brand's show.
He's breathing in air that David Icke is not really allowed to enjoy.
And at the same time, he's trying to hang out with David Icke, who's invested in his own lane of conspiracy alternative media.
Alex wants to have his cake and eat it too, and that causes tension.
The issue is that these things don't really work together.
The Rogan Tucker brand, that media ecosystem relies on collaboration and mutual promotion, while David Icke has a market that's almost entirely based on being the only one who truly gets it.
These are oppositional forces, and Alex believes that he can wrangle both.
But he can't, really.
The good news is that David Icke has no interest in trying to destroy Alex.
He just is lashing out to try and get into a fight with someone for some publicity.
He's got a new book coming out.
Those other dudes like Rogan and Tucker wouldn't bite on this kind of an obvious try to fight with me.
But based on where Alex has placed himself, he really can't easily ignore David Icke.
What I want to talk about here today is how they're winning.
And I've got a short clip I want to play when we come back from break of Joe Rogan with the NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers, who I really admire, not for the NFL.
I like football.
I mean, I think it's cool.
I mean, I think he's...
I like him a thousand times more because he's got courage.
And they had some nice things to say about me.
But what it's really about is the fact that this broadcast is now seen by Tucker Carlson, set it on air, into my face, Joe Rogan, all of them, as the most accurate.
So you can kind of see how Alex's position is fundamentally at odds with David Icke.
The definition of proving that the globalists are being defeated is that an idiot like Aaron Rodgers said nice things about Alex on Rogan's podcast.
This is foundational stuff for Alex.
The core of his identity and the characterization of the fight against the devil depends on what people are saying about him on Rogan's podcast.
Consider that David Icke takes a different view.
He believes that shows like Rogan's are meant to be gatekeepers that make sure the audience gets a taste of alternativeness, but keeps them out of the real stuff that's really threatening to the global cult.
In Ike's conception, the fact that Rogan and his guests are saying nice things about Alex means that Alex isn't cutting edge.
You can kind of see in that contrast how Alex can maybe give lip service and the fake appearance of a debate with Ike, but it's far too threatening to his sense of self to even consider the position that Ike is coming from.
In this sense, their interview is doomed before it begins because in order to side with David Ike, you have to fundamentally change your value system.
Well, I mean, I think what's fun about it is that I kind of has it backwards in that I think what he's realizing, or at least kind of the phenomena that he's misinterpreting, is how many people want to enjoy the more extreme without having to live there, you know?
A lot of people like, as, you know...
The reason that Alex has to frame Aaron Rodgers saying obvious things is courage, despite the fact that there are no consequences for him possible, right?
Like, what are they going to do?
He's already made tens of millions of dollars.
He's already a Hall of Fame quarterback.
The worst that can happen is he doesn't get a job next to Troy Aikman.
Yeah, people like Rogan and even Russell Brand give the impression that you're able to dip into this macabre, bizarre view of the world and still live a normal life and have fun and maybe even be a rich celebrity and shit.
Whereas David Icke, there's a guarantee that if you believe this stuff...
You're fucked.
It's the rest of your life, and you're just doing this.
And if you subscribe to the Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson's perspective, which I do, which is that at one point in time, there was an incredibly sophisticated society, probably more sophisticated than we are, that lived in Africa, in Egypt, and that those people were probably in a different...
Different direction, but far more advanced than we are today.
And then they were wiped out.
And then go after that.
So if you're talking about 11,000 years ago, 11,800 years ago when they got wiped out, and we're down to 1% of the population, think about what history looks like when you go back 4,000 years, 3,000.
All right, Roger, I would be remiss if I didn't talk about the Tucker Carlson interview.
It's obviously bigger than Carlson, bigger than Putin.
It's about trying to stop World War III, and it's about the war against the press and the idea that...
Tucker couldn't go interview whoever he wants.
They're calling for him to be indicted for the Espionage Act.
All of this.
And then I watched the whole thing last night and watched part of it again this morning, but all the other news is so pressing.
I'm going to cover it more on a special Saturday show Sunday and Monday.
It's so big, we need to unpack it all.
But we saw a real intellect, no matter what you think about Putin, he's obviously a strong man and doesn't play games, that is in charge of a country.
The fifth largest economy in the world, the largest nuclear power, and that Tucker asked some pretty tough questions, too, about, hey, you need to release that Wall Street Journal journalist right now.
I expect to take him home with me.
I mean, Tucker said, no, don't you debate that he's a hostage.
So on Thursday, February 8th, the title of Alex's show was World Braces for Tucker Carlson's Historic Interview with Vladimir Putin.
On Wednesday the 7th, the show was titled World Braces for Release of Tucker Carlson Interview as Deep State Accelerates War on Press.
This was the top fucking story for days, and then after it's released, Alex is giving it short shrift on the show, saying he'll cover it later, and moving on to the exciting, flashy fight with David Icke.
It really couldn't be clear that Alex didn't get what he wanted from this interview.
He has no real propaganda to use out of this long, mostly boring interview itself, and he desperately doesn't want to acknowledge how insulting Putin was to Tucker.
So we have this.
And I will say that I had my misgivings about taking up a whole show to cover the interview, but I think you were right.
It's valuable to cover because it's being rewritten by Alex almost immediately.
The existence of the thing that happened, that you can mold into whatever shape you want, that is more valuable than the content of the actual interview.
Putin didn't come around to Tucker's side about releasing Evan Gershkovic at all.
From the first moment Tucker brought that case up, Putin was very clear they had no problem releasing him, but the price needed to be right.
Tucker did say something to the effect of, like, hey, come on, man, you know he's not a spy, but Putin just said that...
No, I do consider him a spy.
Tucker made no headway on that issue.
This is already something that's being rewritten by Alex, and this makes no sense.
If he's decrying the war on the press, how does he square that with the reality that Putin has imprisoned this American journalist on false pretenses for the sake of a hostage exchange?
This is a comical level of dissonance that Alex is displaying in his coverage.
You've heard Alex say a couple times that the interview was so intellectual, and I think that that's his way of trying to lionize the interview, even though there's not really a lot in it that can play to the show and the audience without boring them.
Has an improved view of Putin after Putin was so dismissive of Tucker.
I really do think that he's more and more enamored of...
I mean, how can you say, alright, this guy runs a country, and then immediately follow that with the fifth largest economy in the world, and then not immediately follow that with, one guy shouldn't do that shit.
What?
What are we doing?
Instead, he's like, look at how awesome it is that one guy has complete control.
How could Roger have thought the historical part at the beginning was stonewalling?
Like, I get that Tucker could make that mistake in the moment, because he's there having the interview, and maybe he's just, like, really out of sorts.
But if you're listening to it and watching it, how could that be the impression that you get?
That's weird.
Also, Alex's assessment of things is once again way off.
Russia is not a country that has not been friendly with China.
Xi and Putin are very much allies and their countries have been close for quite a while now.
It is true that the invasion of Ukraine has driven them closer together as Russia has become more disconnected from the world community, but to try to pretend that they weren't close before is ridiculous.
I know that Alex has to find a way to try to balance his narratives about loving Putin and hating Xi, but this is no good.
This does not work.
It's comical on its face.
Are they also just going to pretend that Putin didn't argue quite clearly that he doesn't think Ukraine is a real country and that they're actually Russian so he can seize territory?
That seems like a pretty big element of the interview that's inconvenient for Alex's existing narratives, so I guess they're just going to ignore it.
And, I mean, it is a testament to how much, like, shit doesn't really matter except as it is useful.
You know what I mean?
It is only whatever utility this thing has for me is what it is, as opposed to it is actually a thing in and of itself.
And you're right, I think there is an importance to minding that.
This boring-ish thing, how is it going to be weaponized and used by people as a prop?
Yeah, you see it already.
And that to me screams That it wasn't what they wanted.
You know, with Alex, days of his episodes being titled, the world is bracing for the release of this thing, and then it comes out and he's like, I'm gonna fight with David Icke.
Like, it's not, it doesn't make sense.
I'm gonna talk a tiny bit about this in very vague, dismissive terms, and rewrite a few parts of it that I think work on the edges of what I wanted it to be, and then just move along.
Yeah, and then, because here's what I think is going to be the case now, is it will be useful in the future, and because so many people didn't actually watch it, they will only have something of their own impression about which to, you know...
Yeah.
Especially their response.
Like, so many people, I've read all of their stuff, and none of them were like, okay, well, here's Tucker's existing narratives that he's trying to push.
They're all like, Tucker the journalist didn't do a good job.
And it's like, well, one, you're already stupid.
He's not a journalist, and he hasn't been.
Shut up.
You know, it's already done.
And so I keep thinking back to, like, I know this is a weird, specific reference, but that Carol Howe story.
That early on story she had where she was being chased by four black men.
And that's how she broke her ankles or whatever.
And that was just credulously reported for 40 years.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, people just kept repeating that because they didn't even, you know, why would she?
Lie about that.
Why would that happen?
And it's kind of the similar, it's similar to this, you know?
Why would Alex say the opposite of what happened happened?
And then if you haven't watched the actual interview, if you've only watched parts of it, then you'll go, well, there are parts, he can't be lying about everything he's saying.
So there's something that's going to slip through the cracks that is not true.
But you see something here that I think is important.
Like, you made a point a couple times in our Tucker coverage that the goal for Tucker and Putin should be to do something to galvanize support for Trump because if Trump gets into office, he's threatening to essentially destroy NATO, which would free up Russia to do whatever they want, more or less, in the region.
For whatever reason, the interview didn't entirely go down that path, but you can see how the idea of this interview is closely coupled in Alex's mind with the re-election of Trump.
What you were touching on is what the folks in Alex and the right-wing media, what they were expecting.
So these thoughts are pretty easy to jump between.
They were expecting this to be a way that they could then jump to give Trump money for his campaign.
And even though it wasn't that, Alex still has that pathway in his mind to use this interview as a prop to get there.
So now, Jordan, we get to the point where everybody wanted this to go.
And by everybody, I mean nobody.
And that is David Icke shows up.
So Alex gives a little introduction to David Icke.
And I think Alex is mad.
I think that's one of the things you're going to get the sense of through this, because David Ike told him to wake the fuck up on Twitter, and Alex doesn't like that kind of thing.
All right, I've been wanting to get him on for months, and we've got him.
Best-selling author, former top BBC broadcaster, former head of the Green Party, but better known for the last 35 years since he got thunderstruck with a vision of the coming New World Order.
I really respect him.
I know he's a great guy.
David Ike.
Is here with us, and I think he serves a great purpose, you know, being kind of the counterbalance to Elon Musk and the things he's been doing.
But I'll be honest, I see Elon moving, you know, if he was pointed towards the New World Order five years ago, I see him moving rapidly, you know, in a 180.
And so I'm positive for the good changes happening and how it's helping accelerate the awakening.
I'm not going to turn the lights off and turn my back on Elon Musk.
But that said, I don't think it's fair.
When David comes up with this term, the mainstream alternative media, or ma 'am, or minions of Elon Musk, I'm also not looking a gift horse in the mouth.
I think that, you know, the two of them have an unfortunate...
Uh, association, and I think that Alex does have a reason, like, here's the thing, like, David Icke does have his own audience, and there is a legitimate audience there, and Alex would like to cater to that audience and have his own, like, sort of credibility with them, and so ignoring David essentially cuts off that section of whatever potential audience he has.
Yeah, you know, I keep, in my head, I think about that and I go, well, it's not possible for you to, you know, whenever it's a purity test, if you're already in the too pure line, you can't then be like, oh, well, I also enjoy Alex.
But I'm sure there are plenty of people.
If not plenty, at least some people who can rationalize it that you wouldn't otherwise have.
So even if it's 100 people out of 10 million, you know, that's 100 more than you would have had.
The $10 million of your contracts and the book deals to be the new Rush Limbaugh, Roger Ailes, Fox News shows, because they were straight up, you're going to work for us now.
So there's something in that clip that I think is really worth noting.
Alex is trying to pretend that David Icke's criticism of Alex is that he's on Twitter, but that's not the case.
He's essentially arguing that this click within the mainstream alternative media is beholden to and makes excuses for Musk in a way that they wouldn't for other figures and didn't before Elon Musk bought Twitter.
Part of this has to do with the fact that he bought Twitter, obviously, and Twitter is essential for misinformation peddlers in the modern era to run their businesses.
But just using Twitter itself is not David's criticism.
David is on Twitter.
That's where he and Alex got into a fight.
So, I mean, it's not that.
Alex is using this straw man because he wants a simpler thing to defend himself about than the charge that he treats Musk with kid gloves and essentially hero-worships him because he pretends to care about free speech and he bought a platform that allows everyone in the right-wing conspiracy space to make a lot more money more easily.
But there's another aspect here, and that is that Alex has juxtaposed being on Twitter with offers that globalists allegedly have made to do things for him, like make him the next Limbaugh.
He's made that comparison twice on this show already.
That's weird, because in that situation, it's a job offer.
With Twitter, it's just being allowed to post on a platform.
This makes me curious if there is any job-like aspects with Alex's relationship with Twitter.
Is there a financial arrangement with him being on there?
Like, I know that he's a verified account, so it seems likely he's making money from engagement to the things that he posts, but that's true of all sorts of accounts.
The question here, is there a deeper connection that's making Alex compare being back on Twitter to being a job?
I don't know that that's the case, though, and I have no information, but the way that Alex is talking about this, like, I turned down all these deals for jobs from globalists.
Like, that seems to only really be applicable as a defense to being on Twitter if it's a job that you've gotten.
I suppose he could be insecure because he could...
Okay.
If I'm Alex, maybe I'm insecure about going back on Twitter in the first place.
Maybe I'm insecure because I said all kinds of stuff where I'm like, the best thing that happened was we got kicked off Twitter and all of that stuff.
And I should be looking like I'm more cool and hardcore.
And instead, I went running back to Twitter.
And I made a reference to giving Elon Musk a blowjob, not because I wasn't going to do it, but because metaphorically, that is what I'm doing all the time.
I would not want to put myself out there quite like that, especially when you're putting yourself into a box that has you riding Elon Musk's coattails, you know?
Well, first of all, I'm not saying that people shouldn't use Twitter X. Of course they should use it.
I use it.
It's a vehicle at the moment for as long as it lasts to get information out.
An M in MAM doesn't stand for minion.
It stands for mainstream.
And there has become a mainstream alternative media, which has dominated the airwaves, if you like.
And if we could just start before we get into Musk, one of the things that I've observed, and that is that when I started out...
There was no alternative media, just one or two people.
And I watched the alternative media emerge.
And although, you know, it was still seeing left and right to a certain extent, there was a lot of streetwise people who were realizing that left and right is a puppet show.
And that the real...
Decisions that are working through left and right are being made by deeper levels than the left-right political level, what I call the global cult.
If you're Alex, you probably don't like hearing that.
Here's the guy whose whole thing is that he has more integrity than everybody else, who you have to pretend to respect, who's reminding you that things used to not be about left and right in the alternative media.
That's gotta suck, since there is a criticism buried in there.
These people who were in Ike's conception of the MAM, they all lean to the right, or at very least their politics can be described as opponents of the left.
Who on the left does Alex even associate with or have on the show?
If Alex hears that criticism and understands it, what's being said is that you guys, David Icke speaking here, you guys...
Have fallen back into the left-right paradigm and can't see the forest for the trees.
Everything that you complained about about how that old generation was all stuck in that left-right paradigm and how when you're in your 20s, you're going to make a big difference and change things.
You see at the left and right level, we're left, they're the liberals.
We're against the liberals.
But you go a step deeper into the rabbit hole, into the web, to the cult level.
And what appears to be the situation here can be very different here.
And what I've noticed, particularly since COVID, is that this, what I call mainstream of the alternative media that gets all the numbers, basically, has regressed back into this left-right paradigm.
It's one of those things where if I'm doing interpretation of the Lord of the Rings, you know, my surface level, my deep and all this stuff, but my close reading says to me that only Gollum could have ever destroyed the ring.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, only evil can truly look into the face of evil and, you know, destroy the ring.
This feels like Gollum being like, I'm fighting you, Sauron!
So, David makes a very valid point here about how everybody in that media ecosystem, the whole MAM, the MAM, all of them are, like, really into Putin, but Putin is in bed with China.
So what I'm saying is, you know, if you look at it at left and right, then you can see it a certain way, and most people have.
But if you look at it from this big picture level, then what you have is the pushbackers of the West kind of seeing Putin as some kind of hero when he's absolutely in bed with the Chinese that the pushbackers say is a danger.
When you're saying I'm changing what I'm saying, I don't think you're tuning in because I'm saying the same stuff you're saying, buddy, and I agree with you.
So the point that David is making here is one that's an essential tension for Alex's position with Putin, that he's trying to deflect away with things like the comment earlier when he said...
That Russia, they didn't trust China, but they've had to recently.
He can't square the circle of his narratives.
And that's an inconvenient thing that David Icke is pointing out.
That the hero of this MAM is in bed with the country they claim is the big villain.
This doesn't make sense.
And no amount of talking over people is going to shake someone like David Icke from trying to make this point and continuing to make this point.
But you see Alex try.
He throws David a bone, hoping to get him off track, saying that he criticizes Musk not being anti-China enough, and then going on to browbeat David about the Twitter comments.
This just probably isn't gonna work with someone like David Icke, but, you know, it probably would with somebody else.
Someone else who didn't have their own, like, sense of self and gravitas in their own circle probably would be like, you know, okay, I'll allow the topic to shift, but not David Icke.
The foundation of human control, where we're going, is...
Connecting the human brain to artificial intelligence, not least via the cloud, the electromagnetic cloud of 5G, 6G, 7G to come, which is being generated by the towers, but fundamentally, if you want it globally, it's being generated by low-orbit satellites.
Now, without this cloud, this agenda cannot happen.
This is the cloud that Ray Kurzweil at Google talks about, where he said that the human brain is going to be connected to the cloud, artificial intelligence.
And then he says artificial intelligence will do more and more of human thinking until human thinking, as we know it, is basically negligible.
So this cloud is fundamental.
And SpaceX...
Elon Musk's of SpaceX is leading the way in putting up low orbit satellites to beam this stuff at the Earth.
And so the question is, if you are against this new world order, this human control system and hive mind, why are you facilitating it and bragging about it?
In posts on Twitter X, but you're putting these low-orbit satellites up there.
And, you know, if Elon Musk is such a rebel, such a threat to the system, how come that SpaceX gets all these contracts, massive amounts of money, from people like NASA and the Pentagon?
Only a few months ago, they were awarded a contract.
By the Pentagon to take over and create something called Starshield, which is the military government communication system version of Starlink.
Now, these things should be questioned.
When Tucker Carlson interviews Elon Musk, when Joe Rogan interviews Elon Musk, they should be asking, how do you square this?
Now, the connection...
To the cloud is meant to be via chipping.
And here we have Neuralink from someone who says AI could be the end of humanity, and yet turns out more and more AI stuff.
The Neuralink has just had the first human trial.
Now, I think it's a bit of a kind of diversion because the real connection to the cloud is through Nanotechnology, not least that which was and is in the fake vaccine.
But it's still going down the same road of chipping.
So yeah, that's all a load of wild bullshit, but it's interesting to see how this case that Ike is laying out against Elon Musk contains both entirely fantasy elements and some really good points.
Yeah, pretty much everything about the cloud and vaccines and the conspiracy plot is rambling nonsense, but his critique of the ma 'am is pretty spot on.
Folks like Rogan do not treat Musk how they would treat someone else in his position.
If the only thing Musk was doing was the brain chips and he wasn't Elon Musk and didn't own Twitter, they would never stop talking about how he was secretly trying to turn people into robots on behalf of Satan or the globalists.
Leave alone all the stuff about the contracts with the Pentagon and shit like that.
That would be endlessly assessed.
David Icke is a madman, but he has rightly assessed that these people have a suspicious lapse in their inquisitiveness when it comes to Musk, and unfortunately, that's not something that's supposed to be called out.
Musk gives these man figures access, and they don't want to jeopardize that access, being able to pile around with one of the richest men on Earth.
I have zero doubt that Alex...
He already understands this dynamic pretty clearly, and it's just not something that people normally bring up, because all these other people that Alex interacts with crave that same access to Musk.
David Icke doesn't care, and actually relishes being the only voice in opposition to this crowd.
It's interesting to see this dynamic in action, though I hate that it's David Icke.
It just sucks when someone that awful is making a good point, but he's making a good point.
The point is, as I've said many times, you don't have to be a knowing agent of the cult.
But if you have a certain mentality and you focus, for instance, on left-right politics, and they're the people that get the promotion and the numbers.
These are all WEF agendas, by the way, which is autonomous vehicles, where the computer will decide where you can and cannot go, not your personal choice.
And so you have Tesla.
So what I'm saying is, you look at the companies and the things that are done that he's fronting up, and these need to be questioned.
And since he took over Twitter X, in very large areas, they're ceasing to be questioned.
But you remember how Alex said that David Icke is the turd in the punch bowl?
Oh, yeah.
He is still, but in a different way.
Back then, what Alex meant was that he brought the alien stuff into it and ruined all the patriot militia right-wing conspiracies that were actually about serious stuff, like the UN invasion of the United States and FEMA camps and stuff.
So yeah, now David Icke is a different kind of turd in the punch bowl, where he's the guy who doesn't let you have your fun.
You have your narratives, and it's all like...
You're dancing along.
Everything is a la-la-la.
Great time.
And then David comes along and, what about the self-driving cars?
What about how this is compatible with the UNWEF agenda?
I agree with most of what you're saying, but you've made statements and things, so I'm not bad for interjecting and bringing things up and telling you I'm saying the same thing I do.
I think the combination of Minion, the feminized acronym, and the just straight up, why are you making me feel bad for not being as cool as I think I am?
What's personal to David Icke is that people aren't paying attention to what's right.
Not that people aren't paying attention to David Icke specifically.
It'd be fine, you know.
But definitely.
David Icke is the only person saying what David Icke is saying, so obviously people have to pay attention to me if they are believing the right things.
So in this next clip, I've left out a little bit that was hard to contain in one clip because of a commercial break.
Essentially, Alex is stipulating that David is right and arguing that if Elon Musk is some kind of a globalist plant, then it must mean that the Patriot side is winning huge because they needed to pull that level of desperation gambit.
Well, he's trying to give a hypothetical scenario where, okay, let's say you're right.
We're still great.
So Alex is trying to discuss how the idea that Musk could be a trick is evidence of a great awakening, and that leads us here to this unfortunate moment.
I know I'm real, and I just see a huge awakening happening, and that goes to your point, well, they're going to need to co-opt it, so how would they strike back?
So he's bought Twitter and he puts out the Twitter files and he shows that Twitter's operation, who could post and what could be posted, was basically completely controlled by the deep state.
And if you said to people, was Twitter controlled by the deep state?
Before Elon Musk, they'd say, yeah, all the Twitter files, they showed it.
Yeah.
OK.
So the deep state was in a position that was exactly what it wanted then.
It was controlling the narrative, who could post and who couldn't, just like Facebook and YouTube and all these people.
So my question is, why did they sell it to Musk then, who is supposed to be this free speech absolutist?
Why would they do that?
And then you ask, OK, so what's happened as a result?
And what's happened as a result is exactly what I'm talking about and challenging, which is people have stopped questioning all the ways that this man is serving the agenda of the cult and the World Economic Forum, etc.
They've stopped doing it in the way they would have done had he not bought and run Twitter.
So it's in moments like this that you can see why a lot of folks in The Ma 'am, as Ike would put it, don't like David Icke.
He's really inconvenient for purveyors of lazy narratives because he's an asshole who also has his own world of celebrity that he doesn't need you for.
He's prone to poke holes in stories or shine a light on plot holes you were hoping to gloss over, at least when that poking and shining serves the furtherance of one of his conspiracies.
But yeah, there's really no answer to this question in the real world.
If the globalists had a perfect censorship and narrative-building machine in Twitter, and all the evidence of their meddling was right there in their files, and Elon Musk really was some kind of antagonist to their agenda, why would they sell it to him?
They didn't have to sell it to him.
They could have easily rejected his offer, but they didn't, which doesn't make sense if the conspiracy narratives are meant to be believed.
To these folks, David Icke is annoying because he doesn't play ball.
That doesn't mean he's right or any better than any of these people like Alex or Tucker, but he's more of a stickler for playing his own game.
He's not going to dive into your game willy-nilly just because it seems like...
Well, because they're essentially working with Musk.
You know, it's just a transition of ownership that gets heat off of Musk's other projects.
That would be what it is.
The cloud stuff and the satellites and the brain chips and all that stuff that Musk is doing is so important to the furtherance of the globalists' aims that they just transitioned ownership over in a pretend fight with people like Jack over the censorship and stuff in order to trick...
The pushbackers, as I believe he said, the people who are supposed to be the watchdogs on the wall and stuff, they get tricked into thinking that Elon Musk is on their team in order to, like, don't look over here, don't look over here.
So that's kind of how I think it would work, from your question.
And the other thing that's happening in the mainstream alternative media is that people are coming in since COVID And are now being promoted as the people we're supposed to listen to, the people that get massive audiences when they are given interviews with Tucker Carlson, people like Brett Weinstein.
And Brett Weinstein's interviewed on Tucker Carlson as if he's some kind of expert and activist on COVID.
And this is the man who bought every aspect of COVID virtually and...
There's a video of him during the fake pandemic describing how he wore a scarf around his neck so he could pull it up over his face every time he answered the door.
And now we're being told that this guy is supposed to be the COVID activist that gets the massive numbers on Tucker Carlson.
unidentified
What about all the people that were calling it out in 2020, Tucker?
Well, I was and you were, but David, let me just stop you there.
And I actually wrote some notes on this, and I forgot the house, but this is one of my points.
Brett Weinstein, when he went on Tucker, admitted he was wrong, and said that it's all a lie, there's a global government takeover, we're being invaded, and the borders are open, and the New World Order is real, and there's a global government that we need to...
I don't know if you watched the full interview.
I bet Tucker wants to interview you.
I mean, so my point is, I know Tucker's for real.
Tucker is really woken up now.
And is a great guy.
I mean, he's not the devil.
Musk has this background.
I get your points there.
But just when you just sit there with a bra...
I mean, don't we have to be ready to have people that were wrong wake up and join us?
All that being said, it's always nice to hear someone shit on Brett Weinstein.
That dude sucks and it's a joke to take him seriously on COVID issues, but I need to make some of the subtext text here.
David Icke believes that there was no virus.
He believes that COVID and pretty much...
I believe his position is that all viruses are fake.
He's not calling Weinstein a charlatan because he's a charlatan.
He's mad that Weinstein believes there was a real virus.
Alex knows that, but is acting like that's not what David's position is because that would lead to another fight, which is really just compound things at this point.
And there's one thing that I think is, you know, strange.
We've heard a bit already of David Icke talking about the plans of the vaccines and all this to make nanotech into your body to put you into the cloud and all that.
But Alex has a weird response here that, if true, is a big problem.
Self-replicating technology to connect people to the cloud was in the fake vaccines.
Of course, there were many saline, I'm sure, as well.
But those self-replicating systems that have been shown in the blood of people who've had the fake vaccine, that's what's supposed to connect us to the cloud.
And every single SpaceX satellite that goes up there, and all the other companies doing it, but they're the leader, Every new 5G tower and 6G, 7G tower to come is building this cloud to which we are supposed to be connected.
This is the bottom line.
This is what has to be stopped.
This is what we have to refuse to cooperate with.
But if you get kind of focused on the left-right kind of Biden-Trump stuff, I'm not saying people shouldn't look at that.
Of course they should.
But it's the big picture that's being obscured by that focus of attention.
Just in the place of debate, you said, I'm going to stop here, you said don't make it personal, I'm not going to be an asshole and read these things.
All I'm telling you is, is that...
I am not a minion of the system.
I will use any avenue I can, and I see a big bandwagon waking up at the New World Order.
I can't help but excited.
I do smell the double cross, and I'm going to say this.
When they first put me on X and a little bit after, I watched that when I did certain things and exposed certain things, like China and things, suddenly we weren't reaching 10 million people or 5 million people per post.
We've been dialed back.
And we're seeing that now, that the conservatives all come in, and now I even talk to some of the biggest accounts.
They're seeing it too, so I think you're going in the right direction here.
If what Alex is saying is true, he has no reason to maintain any of these positions that he has about Musk at all.
He's masquerading around as some kind of free speech guy, condemning the past owners of Twitter for shadow banning people, but then Alex gets his reach turned down when he starts criticizing China?
That's a major red flag, and if that were actually happening, Alex would be incensed.
To the extent some of Alex's posts underperformed, I'm sure that's just the result of lack of interest in some of his chosen topics.
I don't believe that what Alex is saying happened, and I'm pretty sure this is just Alex giving lip service to David because he knows that David Icke is not going to stop.
If what Alex is saying is true, or even if Alex just believes it to be true, he's got to stop supporting Musk, or at least become very critical of him.
Is the guy who shadowbans you for posting about China someone you can trust to brain-chip people?
Are you kidding?
He's going to put fentanyl the Chinese dragon in your head.
You can't have that.
You're going to be walking around just seeing fentanyl all over the place.
Yeah, but you're forgetting he's going to put Fentanyl the racist dragon in your head and not some sort of pro-LGBTQ purple penguin in your head, which I think arguably is better.
Yeah, and I will, but just let me say this in response to what you've just said.
You can use X to get information out.
Knowing what it is, without describing Elon Musk as the biggest maverick in the last 500 years, mate.
He ain't the biggest maverick in the last 500 minutes.
And if you ask me about who he is, he's a frontman.
He's a salesman.
You know, I had to bloody laugh when he said on the Joe Rogan, one of the Joe Rogan interviews, That he spent 80% of his time designing and engineering.
Oh, at the same time that he runs all these companies, apparently, and tweets on Twitter X all the time.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
He's a front man.
Other people in the background are running the show, but he's a very good salesman.
He's selling the electric car, autonomous car thing.
He's selling the microchip.
He's saying, oh, look, you know, we've got more and more Starlink connections and satellites.
Isn't it great?
Oh, yeah, Elon.
Without people realizing, actually, the prison is being built all around them.
So he's a front man.
And what we need to do is take everything on its merits without falling for the hype.
And that means that we will question these people, whether they run Twitter X or not.
It was back in the mid-1990s that David said non-human interdimensional creatures are sucking our souls and killing us and making us war with each other.
Now when you talk about it, it's mainline news.
Now Tucker Carlson says he believes it.
People don't balk.
So there's a big awakening.
I want to go to some of these X Spaces comments or questions.
So I was dead set on not caring about this at all, but then I looked up Adrian Dittman's account on Twitter, and I have no idea what's going on.
So there's two things here that I struggle to put into their right place.
The first part is that Adrian Dittman's Twitter account is full of posts glorifying Elon Musk and all of his companies, which makes me think that it's Elon under an alias.
Famously, last July, there was a Twitter space where Elon had a whole conversation with Adrian Dittman, who's the guy who sounds just like him.
It's very confusing because it seems like a prank where Elon could be doing both voices, but it just doesn't seem like that's possible since they're both talking at the same time at multiple points during that conversation.
I just don't know how they would fake that, per se.
This was even covered in media outlets like Yahoo, though they didn't do any...
So that's one possible scenario, but I have two that I came up with, and I think the most plausible one is that this is a different guy who sounds just like Elon Musk, who, because he sounds a lot like Elon Musk, has leaned into it and has made his Twitter presence very Musk-centric.
That seems like Occam's razor for me.
I could be wrong, and maybe I'm just not in on the joke, but it's hard for me to figure out how Elon could possibly be talking live as two people talking over each other in that space.
A sibling...
Maybe a Freaky Friday situation.
Maybe you could be onto something.
The alternative, though, is that Elon is so addicted to tweeting that he has an entire second account that he uses to pretend to be someone else who really loves Elon Musk and all his companies, which seems believable, but also painfully sad.
But there's a big difference from what the gentleman's just said, that we're in a Hyde mind and all that stuff as we're speaking.
But, you know, there's a difference between having connections with people and communications with people and having the perceptions that we make of what we say and what we make of what other people say.
So, this is kind of to David Icke's credit, I guess, and that is that he's not even engaging at all with the fact that this guy sounds exactly like Elon Musk.
You think that everything is different or that we don't have a smart dust.
You don't need smart dust when you have a device that is capable of all the things that you've mentioned and you are already connected to the hive mind.
What the hell are you communicating on right now?
Who are you communicating with?
All the people.
Their perceptions shared through a medium of speech.
There is structurally no difference between having a bunch of nanobots running through your bloodstream accomplishing the same thing when you're holding a device that is connected to this thing that is a field of information that is the internet.
There's nothing wrong.
There's nothing wrong about it.
There's nothing strange about it.
It's just the way things are.
Integrating stuff like this into our cells biologically just removes the latency and decreases the latency for information transmission.
I know that you could go to a live show around 2008 to 2018 and see MF Doom, and I don't know if it'd be Doom behind that mask.
So if you want to have a conversation with yourself on the space that you own, maybe that's a lot easier to do than...
I don't know.
It sounds like him.
And it sounds like him in real life, too.
Like, there's no way that I can read about how he's a workaholic with a nonstop, like, constant stream of consciousness going, and then listen to a Joe Rogan interview where he goes slowly and not think that he's doing that deliberately.
Dan, we've got to get a break, and I want to ask the ex-poster that sounds just like Elon Musk.
A dead ringer.
Please stay there if you can.
We're on radio stations, so we have to at least break twice an hour.
We've got to go to a three-minute break.
We're going to come right back.
I hope the caller stays there that sounds just like Elon Musk.
But I get the point of the Elon Musk-sounding person.
He's saying we don't use tools like the Native Americans didn't have guns, so they lost.
He's saying, why not use it?
It's kind of what I'm getting.
But we'll come right back and have the person that sounds just like Elon Musk, a little bit of an angry Elon Musk, finish up what he wants to say, and then they'll get David Icke here.
This is...
I'm in the Twilight Zone right now.
David Icke and a guy that sounds just like Elon Musk.
And I've been with two and a half hours with Elon Musk before.
You can't call into something to pretend to be that sock puppet and have it actually have the impact that you're describing of, hey, someone is standing up for me and defending me.
It's very transparent if that were what you were doing.
It seems like the arguments for it actually being him fail in some ways, although it's hard to also get past the point where it's like, it's believable that it could be him.
I mean, if Elon Musk does need plausible deniability, it's pretty much out the window now that Alex has said that, so there is no plausible deniability.
I'm still not totally convinced it's him.
He sounds a lot like him, but there are differences enough that make me be like, eh, it's possible.
It's not.
What is clear is that Alex 100% thinks it is, and that somewhat at Infowars, probably Chase Geyser, who's working the boards today, told David during the break that this is Elon Musk.
That's not evidence that it is, though, because they're wrong about a lot of stuff.
But also, we don't have evidence that it isn't.
And so, like, this is it, is it not is a question that, you know, we have no access to and no way of proving one way or the other.
So listen, I'm going to have another question to Adrian, another question to David Icke, but let me throw that out at you.
Tucker Carlson says he believes interdimensional entities are manipulating reality already through this simulation.
We all basically know this is.
I think we're all agreeing that's pretty much what we're in.
We haven't figured it out yet.
I think Adrian's saying we can use our own systems of AI to break through that and find out what's happening.
Maybe I'm putting words in his mouth.
But regardless, having a debate about this, an open discussion, I think is really healthy.
But Adrian, what do you think about the idea that aliens aren't coming from a distant star system, but have actually always been here, like I've said, and that there is a manipulation already of the reality?
I mean, I haven't seen any actual definitive evidence of aliens.
The only proof that we have is, say, really shoddy footage and potentially even altered stuff that later on, of course, has been exposed to be as such.
But, I mean, it's an interesting theory for sure, and one that does bear a considerable amount of logic.
But still, I mean, I haven't seen any really convincing evidence for aliens.
So they talk about going to Mars, and Adrian believes that they should go to Mars, and David Icke is just progressively getting more like, this is not serious.
David, if you had a chance, and maybe Elon will listen to this later, and wanted to ask Elon a few questions instead of, I get you're on your points, but if you were talking to Elon Musk, which we, okay, what would you say to him?
Well, everything that happens in our reality is people consciousness operating within a simulation, not realizing it's a simulation, unless they are in the inner core of the cult, and then they bloody will.
Yeah, it's very simple that you give an agent a set goal that says, hey, it's a benign agent.
It's an agent that does not seek to destroy anything.
But its goal is to turn things into paperclips, to manufacture paperclips.
And so eventually it realizes, oh, I could create a whole bunch of more paperclips if I say...
Change the atoms that are inside of your body in such a way that it becomes in a paperclip and that it begins paperclipping the fucking universe at some point when it reaches critical mass.
This is obviously bad because then it kills all of humanity in the pursuit of creating paperclips.
Well, if it's somebody that you're so deeply invested in sucking up to, then, yeah, you don't have to, all the standards of what you pretend to enforce on your show, all of that goes out the window.
And the behavior changing and the permissiveness that he has is glaring.
And like I said, and like you said, it makes Musk's, or I'm sorry, it makes David Icke's entire point.
Right, just like Alex's definition of winning the war against the globalists is someone said something nice about him on Rogan.
It's all just his identity is wrapped up in this ma 'am, as David Icke put it, and he's incapable of behaving in ways counter to it.
So, this I thought was pretty shocking because David Icke has been there for an hour and a half talking to Alex, being maybe a little bit insulting, but also game guest.
And Alex is going to give the closing word.
On this whole thing to guy who sounds like Elon Musk.
So, Adrian does not actually get the last word on the show, because eventually Mike Hansen, Alex's old producer and video camera guy, comes in to give him a cake.
Alex is saying that it's a judge tree by its fruits and all this bullshit, but earlier in this episode, he has listed off negative fruits.
He had to admit when David brought it up that Elon Musk is pushing for carbon taxes.
That's a big deal.
That's a big piece of the globalist agenda.
There's the self-driving cars.
This is something that Alex had to give up on.
The whole question of him shadow banning Alex for talking about China.
These are the negative fruits that David's entire point, well, not his entire point, but the part that intersects with reality, the part of his criticism that intersects with reality is that these people, Because of their obsession with Elon Musk, do not give any legitimate pushback or criticism of him where they would if he was somebody else.
And Alex has just essentially demonstrated that.
He's made points in this episode that are the negative fruits that are the things that you should judge Elon Musk by, and then in service of defending him, he says you judge a tree by its fruits, and Elon Musk was great.
Here's what bums me out over the past two episodes.
If that was Elon Musk, then I would say that in the past two episodes...
Two of the most powerful individual human beings ever to live have proven themselves to be fucking idiots that are pathetic, whiny, scared, and have far too much power.
I think the fact that what they're doing is so uninteresting to people because of its...
Off-puttingness, because of its petulance, its whininess, its personal grudginess, its bitterness, to find out that that's the type of shit, to find out that a man with as much money and power as Elon Musk is calling in, period, is fucking scary.
Like I said, that's a question that, you know, maybe will be made clear at some point down the line, but we don't have access to knowing if it is him or not.
What is important is, I think, within this episode, you have a really clear narrative, almost, but not a narrative in terms of a storyline of the world.
There's a storyline, a plot to this episode.
Like, you have Alex...
Shrugging off the Putin interview because it's not what he wanted it to be, and there's not enough fertile ground for him to use it as a garden.
So he just kind of puts that to the side, replaces it with getting into a fight with David Icke.
David Icke has these criticisms about the obsession with Elon Musk.
Alex interviews him impotently and incompetently to the point where he ends up...
Saying stuff that very much agrees with David Icke, even unsolicitedly saying that Elon has been shadow banning him on Twitter since he came back.
Then Elon Musk shows up and Alex proves all of David Icke's points.
Yeah, whatever he agrees to is not going to stick as soon as it's not useful for him.
It is useful for him to give lip service to David Icke's arguments in order to wiggle out of the situation that he's in that is very uncomfortable with David not shutting up about these criticisms of him that he has no rebuttal to.