Jordan Holmes and Dan Friesen dissect Alex Jones’ March 22, 2022, episode, where he exploited Joe Biden’s "New World Order" remark with fabricated claims—like a fake Schwab video endorsing forced abortions and death camps—while dismissing critics as authoritarian leftists. The hosts debunk his cherry-picked clips from Bush, Kissinger, and others, exposing his financial desperation (selling loss-leading merch) and contradictory rants about globalist pet-killing schemes, rooted in a misrepresented Bloomberg inflation op-ed. Jones’ transphobic "concern trolling" with Savannah Hernandez and outdated Liverpool Care Pathway conspiracy further highlight InfoWars’ descent into unchecked bigotry and debunked falsehoods, now offering negative value to public discourse. [Automatically generated summary]
So I was going to put out an episode on Wednesday this week, Jordan.
You know this because you were.
But truth be told, things got a bit overwhelming, and I wanted to see how things ended up playing out.
Monday was an insane day for things that are related to our show.
First, Joe Biden used the words New World Order, and in the process, he gave conspiracy theorists decades' worth of justification to believe that their particular flavor of shadow elite cabal runs the world behind the scenes.
We've discussed that a bit in the past, and we'll do it more today.
As soon as I heard that Biden had said that, I was not pumped to tune in for Alex's response because I feel like it's super predictable, and I don't really have that much more to say than we have in response.
Leaders sometimes talk about the international order of the world, the set of relationships, alliances, trade agreements, and enemies internationally.
Sometimes, when major changes to the status quo of these relationships happen, one might say that the world order has become something new.
It's an expression that makes total sense, and there shouldn't be anything wrong with using them to describe exactly the situation in the world today.
Folks like Alex will hear them and proves that the devil is puppeteering Biden into taunting the world so we don't fight back when he tries to eat our children's blood or something like that.
Then, Monday evening, everything got thrown into chaos.
Will Sommer reported that Alex's lawyers had requested his deposition in the Connecticut Sandy Hook case be postponed because of an emergency medical situation.
Apparently, that afternoon at 3:30 p.m., Norm Pattis had received a call that Alex was, quote, under the care of a physician for medical conditions that require immediate and possibly emergency testing.
Alex had done his show that day and was on air until like 2 p.m., and there was no sign of any particular problem.
In addition, Norm's filing claimed, quote, my client has not authorized me to disclose the nature of the medical conditions or the identity of the physician, which is sketchy.
This was all in service of trying to delay a deposition that was scheduled for this Thursday.
But this leaves an important question that's still hanging, and that is, what's going on with that motion that Norm filed in the first place?
The most obvious answer is that it could be purely an attempt to fuck with the plaintiff's case and stall the process, as has been Alex's legal strategy up till this point.
At every turn, he's pulled out any trick he can think of to slow things down and try and create legal headaches for the opposing counsel.
This would be totally within his character, and I wouldn't put it past him at all.
There's nothing he really stands to lose from sitting for the deposition.
He could just stonewall like he always does, but he does have something to gain in theory from trying to drag his feet and try to force the court to reschedule his trial date, which it would be much more fun for him.
A second option occurred to me, and that is that Alex could have COVID again.
When he got back from California, Alex was complaining about feeling sick, and we know that he's very reckless and unvaccinated, and he's a guy who consistently hangs out with other unvaccinated people and takes no precautions about getting sick.
He's in a high-risk category, and he just took a trip to another state, so the opportunities for him to be exposed to something seem pretty decent at least.
His behavior as a whole would also fit with the COVID idea, because if he had COVID, he would still show up to his studio to do the show.
Yeah, he doesn't give a shit about his staff, and he's admitted he already did that the last time he had COVID.
So, one of the primary reasons I didn't want to jump a gun on this is that I wanted to be able to have some kind of information and not just, you know, come to this show with assumptions and what-ifs.
Thankfully, on Wednesday, a sworn affidavit was filed, and we learned a little bit more about this medical emergency.
As it turns out, on Monday, Alex had the complete lunatic and guy who fantasizes about murders, Dr. Marbles, on his show to do some fun COVID denialism content.
When Marbles showed up at the studio to do the interview, his quote personal observations of Mr. Jones so alarmed him that he insisted on conducting a physical examination of Mr. Jones.
He immediately advised Mr. Jones to go to an emergency room or call 911.
After Mr. Jones refused, the physician advised him to stay home, which Mr. Jones did not do.
The first is that Dr. Marbles is certifiably insane, and I wouldn't take directions to the grocery store from him, let alone medical advice.
So this is all coming from him seeing Alex, getting freaked out, and then, I guess, checking his pulse.
Whatever it was that Marbles saw was enough to advise Alex to call 911, so that does seem serious, although again, Dr. Marbles.
It's advice coming from a lunatic.
Alex didn't take this advice, although he did pass it along to Norm Pattis to use as an excuse to not go to his scheduled deposition, which again probably would have come off a little more convincing if Alex hadn't done his show the next day.
That really punctures any illusion that whatever he's dealing with would preclude him from sitting for a deposition.
So having snubbed Dr. Marbles' advice and not called 911, Alex did his show the next day, Tuesday the 22nd, which is what we're going to cover today.
Marbles was able to convince Alex to go to see a doctor friend of his, Dr. Amy Offutt, who practices in Marble Falls, Texas, which is about an hour outside Austin.
And at this point, I feel like we're in some kind of a weird marbles-based synchronous show.
So Alex saw Dr. Offutt in the morning of Wednesday, March 23rd, and as such, he didn't do his show.
Additionally, he didn't show up for the first day of his scheduled deposition, which was supposed to be, like I said, on Wednesday and Thursday.
This could end up being a problem down the line and might result in some sanctions.
Dr. Offutt was in agreement with Marbles.
She said that Alex shouldn't be doing this deposition at all based on issues related to stress.
She said, quote, I had a medical visit with Mr. Alex Jones for acute medical issues that were time-sensitive and potentially serious.
This is a little tough to parse because the time sensitivity could be in reference to him having a hard deadline about the deposition, as opposed to it being something where his health dictated the time sensitivity.
It's unclear.
In her note, however, there's a redaction.
Quote, we started a comprehensive medical evaluation, and he has labs that are pending to assess his blank status.
I've asked him to avoid too much stress until we have results from the blood tests this morning.
Both of these are things that can be exacerbated by increased stress, and markers would be the kind of things you'd find doing blood tests.
On Wednesday, Alex didn't do his show, but he recorded a long voice memo while he was driving, probably to Dr. Offit's office in Marble Falls, that Owen played periodically on the show to keep the audience from tuning out from his boring answer.
Also, it's hard to get a sense of who Dr. Offit is, but I was able to find an August 2021 article from a local Texas blog about how her and her husband had decided not to get vaccinated.
She apparently has an MD, but her practice is in integrative medicine, which is definitely not where you'd go if you were in need of acute emergency consultation.
Integrative medicine is built on relationships with patients, and her practice seems to actually be one that involves like a bunch of hormone therapy and yoga.
Also, she doesn't accept insurance, which is strange.
I don't know what's going up here, but this is 100% not the doctor you drive an hour to see if you're needing a consultation about a condition that could be an emergency.
None of this adds up.
None of it makes sense.
And I think that she has some kind of association with the America Frontline doctors, the hydroxychloroquine ivermectin doctors.
So it's hard to tell precisely what's going on here, but I think it's probably fair to say that this is an intersection of a shamefully transparent attempt to avoid the deposition and a real but probably not immediately pressing underlying condition that Alex is almost certainly struggling with.
He's in terrible shape, and if he'd had a heart attack at any point in the last three years, I can't imagine anyone being surprised.
So on Wednesday evening, the judge in the case, Judge Bellis, gave an order that was basically saying that Alex didn't listen to Dr. Marbles and still came into work.
So that affidavit isn't really all that convincing in terms of the deposition.
The court wasn't sure who Dr. Offit was, but taken as a whole, the two doctors provided indications that Alex had medical issues that, quote, while potentially serious, are not currently serious enough to either require his hospitalization or convince him to stop engaging in his broadcasts.
Bellis went on to say, quote, Mr. Jones cannot unilaterally decide to continue to engage in his broadcasts, but refuse to participate in a deposition.
And thus, she rejected the motion Alex's lawyers had made to reschedule, and barring a change in circumstances, like Alex actually being hospitalized, that deposition would go on as planned on Thursday, March 24th.
So the real question became, what happens Thursday morning?
Did Alex show up to do his show, or does he show up at the deposition?
In a very brazen move, Alex did not show up for the deposition on Thursday.
Ooh, bold.
He also didn't do his show, though the show did open with a pre-recorded video of him complaining about how his trial is a show trial and how it's not a big deal for him to unilaterally decide that the deposition date should be changed.
To be perfectly honest, when he didn't show up for Wednesday's deposition, I was pretty sure he wasn't going to show up on Thursday either.
And a big part of that was because what he was actually required to produce for the deposition is stuff he could never, never bring up.
It seemed likely to me that he knew he was going to be sanctioned whether he showed up or not.
And if he was able to not show up and make his not showing up somehow about the court not respecting his health needs, he had a chance of changing the narrative and distracting his audience from his clear inability to answer direct questions, particularly about his finances.
Since this is a deposition in the penalty phase of the case, a number of the topics he was going to be required to bring documents about were issues with finances, including agreements that he had with Young Jevity, which, of course, is the veterinarian Dr. Wallach supplement company, and any cryptocurrency transactions and documents related to the connections between his various shell companies, like PQPR Holdings Limited and JLJR Holdings LLC.
If you're in Alex's position, it's strongly in your interest to stonewall this kind of stuff because for the charade of your show to really work, it's pretty important for the listeners to just think that they give Alex money and he uses it to fight the big bad globalists.
Looking at the actual details of his finances would threaten that image and probably chip away at the audience's impetus to blindly throw money at InfoWars.
And, you know, he's not going to provide this information that is being required of him in the deposition, and that'll get him sanctioned.
And from my understanding, that was never really a likely outcome, but that if he were arrested, it would just be a situation where someone comes and gets him and makes him sit for the deposition.
I've already sat three times for depositions in the Sandy Hook case.
We've given them over 300,000 pages of documents.
They got all our financial records, everything for a defamation case.
And so when you see my financials on the news, when you see all the depositions with me on the news, and then you see that I've been defaulted, excuse me, when you see that I've been defaulted saying I gave them nothing, it's all a lie.
These are show trials.
These are staged events.
But I intend to sit for the deposition, the fourth one.
I intend to fight, even though I'm in a court case in Connecticut and Texas with three different cases, two in Texas, one in Connecticut, where I've been found guilty by the judges.
Now, every American, even if they have a low IQ, knows you're innocent to prove and guilty, and the judges don't find you guilty.
Alex doesn't get to decide what is or is not a big deal for the court.
He seems to think that his individual judgment determines what rules he is or is not bound to, which is a pretty disturbing mindset to have on display.
Like, it's essentially him saying I'm above the law.
It very well may be the case that other hearings or depositions have been rescheduled in the past, but when that has happened, it was agreed to by both parties.
And I would guess that it didn't happen with almost no lead time and based on clearly very flimsy rationalizations.
If Alex is trying to suggest that this medical situation is really actually serious to him, his actions do not reflect that.
Doing his show on Tuesday is a gigantic red flag that whatever health concern he had isn't actually pressing, but just could be a convenient excuse to get him out of having to do this deposition that he doesn't want to do and probably would be damaging if he actually cooperated with.
I mean, he does, I will say that in all fairness, one time the defense lawyers did, or the plaintiff's attorneys did have to reschedule because the dog ate their homework.
And larger picture, though, this isn't an isolated case of Alex trying to postpone this deposition.
Alex's legal team has been trying to get this deposition as well as that of their new corporate representative, his lawyer, Brittany Paz.
He's trying to get those postponed for a while.
And according to a court filing, quote, they have also suggested that they may need to extend the trial date in this case.
So Alex and his lawyers are trying to push this back and kick a can down the road.
It's one thing to need to reschedule something.
It's another to exhibit a consistent pattern of creating fake excuses to drag out a process so you might never actually have to face the consequences that are coming to you.
And also, I think in that clip, you kind of get a tell from Alex that he knows he's full of shit.
He says that he's already sat for a deposition three times in, quote, the Sandy Hook case, and he uses the singular noun there.
Later in the clip, he shows that he's keenly aware that there's multiple different cases, which is part of the reason that he's required to sit for separate depositions.
And then there's the dynamic that he's completely abused the discovery and deposition processes in the first phase of the trial.
And now we're into the damage phase where there's a different set of facts that the depositions are set to explore.
So obviously there's going to be more times you're required to say.
Alex knows all this, but he's counting on his audience accepting this bullshit woe-is me take where the whole world has conspired against him in this show trial.
And honestly, it's probably going to work with most of his listeners, but it's a complete fraud.
Well, I mean, if you're worried about the deposition being stressful for you, my friend, I'm afraid that's what a deposition is going to be for you, period.
The issue, too, though, is like anything that's like he, if stress is legitimately the issue, he screams and freaks the fuck out on his show.
He constantly storms out of studio whenever he's mad at the crew.
Right.
Like there's no more stressful experience for him than doing his show.
Sure.
And I think it would be much easier to take this kind of a complaint seriously if his actions didn't indicate that he was still like more than willing to do the thing that's painfully, obviously stressful.
Default judgments are when somebody never shows up one time or never shows up the court or doesn't file papers or gets caught filing fraudulent documents.
And even then you get sanctioned with lesser sanctions.
We have been fed into the Democratic Party process by political judges.
Even if that's the standard that Alex is using to determine when default judgments are justified, his case would merit a default judgment.
He and Owen Schroer both didn't appear for scheduled depositions early in these cases.
He didn't respond to multiple requests or documents.
On multiple occasions, he sent completely unprepared people to depositions to pretend to be corporate representatives, which may not be the same thing as filing fraudulent documents, but man, it's close.
Also, he had a ton of opportunities to stop abusing the process.
He was given smaller sanctions repeatedly, and it was abundantly clear to anyone paying attention that he was going to keep that behavior the fuck up.
They picked a few things I talked about years ago out of context, made me the Sandy Hook man.
And now when we go to court, literally the judges are primping with their mirrors and their makeup, and they're micing them up and micing up the lawyers and the BBC and HNC.
And all the Netflix are there.
And then they get up and say, he's getting rich off Sandy Hook.
He made his whole career off of it.
As the New York Times writer says, buy my book, buy my book.
If he does not understand clearly what the problem is after having it been explained to him in so many ways with so many carrots, so many sticks, sanctions, blood, everything.
You notice that Alex isn't saying that particular plaintiffs in the case have brought in millions of dollars from Sandy Hook because if he did, he would get sued again.
That's the impression that he's trying to give the audience, but he knows damn well that he can't say that because if he did, he would be defaming them again.
We saw this play out in the last deposition that Alex was in, the one in December that I went to in Austin.
Alex has complaints about a group called Sandy Hook Promise, and there are some questions that Alex seems to have about their fundraising and their activism.
Alex believes that all of the Sandy Hook parents are one monolithic group, so he's decided that the plaintiffs in the case against him are interchangeable with Sandy Hook Promise, which he literally knows to not be true based on this exchange from that deposition.
Alex may try to yell and derail the trial with this kind of stuff, but it's not going to go anywhere or do anything because his point is meaningless.
He can use this insinuation here on his show to make the audience think that he's going to walk in like a conquering hero and put the system on trial.
These judges aren't judges.
It's all a farce.
And Alex knows that he can say exactly what he's saying, but if he adds one more detail, he's going to owe a ton more money and maybe create a whole new suit.
Openly saying we want him arrested and put in jail if he doesn't show up for some multi-day long way Connecticut law works.
It's just unlimited, long deal.
And so when I talked to these doctors, they said, you're crazy.
You need to go home.
You need to go get these tests.
I got more tests set today, more tomorrow.
And you need to stay away from the microphone.
Well, here I am, even though I shouldn't be on here because I have to respond to the hundreds of news articles, including the Associated Press, that are attacking me and saying I'm a horrible person.
If you can believe anything Alex says, then there's a decent chance he might be suffering from long-term complications from one of the times he got COVID.
He may have also gotten it again, and then that exacerbates the situation.
The part that makes COVID as an idea fit kind of neatly is Alex's claim that he was getting sicker since he got COVID that second time, which may be true and thus a symptom, or it may be the way that his mind has experienced things, but it's not actually an accurate reflection of the progression of his symptoms.
It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
I actually don't think it's going to be that interesting for anyone but me, but I'll be keeping an eye on the situation and seeing if Alex just stops talking about this as soon as it's not a convenient excuse for him.
I mean, the reason that people bring up HIPAA is almost exclusively when they have COVID and they don't want to tell you they have COVID because whatever recently.
Hell-bent on establishing their new world order, destroying the Christian era and the Renaissance and establishing in its place an absolute scientific dictatorship over humanity.
Now, many a politician and leader going back to World War II has talked of a new world order.
So, this is Alex trying to suggest that there's some kind of a mystical, magical spell that Biden was casting by using the words New World Order on this holiest of days to the globalists 322.
The problem is, though, that Biden said them the day before on 321, Alex is just whining about it.
I could not be less interested in him being like, but also, many a politician over the years has said New World Order.
It's true.
That should undercut your argument.
At no point in time, despite many politicians having called for the New World Order and you claiming that every time they do so, they are creating that new world order that you so fear and them still having not done so.
If I said many a time the pastor of a church has said that the end times are upon us, the following part would be, and they still aren't because they're full of shit, right?
Many a politician and leader going back to World War II has talked of a new world order.
And H.G. Wells, more than 100 years ago, wrote the best-selling book titled A New World Order.
And it came out in the Nuremberg trials of the Nazis in World War II at the end of World War II that the head of German propaganda, Joseph Goebbels, wanted to kill H.G. Wells because of his book, The New World Order.
There are a couple of important things to point out here.
And the first is that you can't just throw around claims like it came out in the Nuremberg trials and expect that to stand as compelling argumentation.
So the material involved in the Nuremberg trials is so dense and copious that understanding all of it would itself be the work of a person's entire career.
If you want to cite something in it, you really need to be more specific because to not do so puts your audience in the terrible position of either taking your word for it or, I guess, scouring thousands and thousands of pages of documentation to see if what you're saying shows up anywhere.
Another important thing to keep in mind is that Joseph Goebbels was not tried at any Nuremberg trial because he had already killed himself prior to the end of the war.
The Yale Law School, through the Avalon Project, hosts transcripts of the entire proceedings of the Nuremberg trial, and H.G. Wells isn't mentioned once.
It is recorded that Wells' books were included in the books that were burned beginning in 1933, but it's really unfair to pretend that Wells was the main target.
Like Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute of Sex Research was definitely a central target, and then tons of authors who the Nazis didn't feel were German enough or the right kind of German had their works burned.
It's a long list, including people like F. Scott Fitzgerald, Upton Sinclair, Franz Kafka, and Helen Keller.
Yeah, so he just makes up whatever he wants to make fake points when he's trying to sell some sort of a narrative, whatever that day's narrative is.
Alex's movie Endgame begins with a misquotation from H.G. Wells' New World Order, and I have absolutely zero qualm saying that he has never read that book.
He almost certainly just saw that faulty quotation in a John Birch Society pamphlet his dad gave him, and that's just been his reality since.
An important point to bring up here is that in some ways, you could really see what Alex is doing here as being pro-Nazi.
I know that he wouldn't accept that characterization, but it really feels like he's applying his own worldview and motives to Goebbels here in a way that's really only meant to get the audience to think that maybe the Nazis weren't doing all that bad stuff.
fighting alex's new world i've been trying to parse exactly what it was he was saying and that's where i'm i'm getting stuck because it does sound i'm not sure if that's the only reading but Right.
Well, I mean, what he said was that H.G. Wells had a book named New World Order, and Goebbels wanted to kill him because the Nazis had their own New World Order.
And we are told pretty clearly that H.G. Wells' New World Order is the devil one.
So unless the devil is like farming out like all kinds of I mean, you know, it's this back in World War II is like the it was everybody was playing in the minor leagues.
You know, there were a bunch of smaller town devils.
There was barnstorming devils who would come in.
They'd have their own kind of thing going on for a while.
Yeah, I find this absurd, but so I can't say with any certainty how much of this is intentional, but if Alex isn't trying to be a Nazi apologist, he needs to be way more careful about how he talks about issues related to World War II.
The first step would be to stop making stuff up about it.
And then after that, stop saying things that clearly indicate that you personally identify with a Nazi leadership.
These would be admirable goals to try and bring into the proceedings.
There's hundreds of these that I'll be airing later in the day of prime ministers and presidents and world leaders defining their new world order as world government.
Autocratic, authoritarian, world government.
And Klaus Schwab has come out saying, we have the video.
China is the model of world government.
So it's not just a world government.
It's a worldwide authoritarian government.
With forced abortion, infanticide, giant death camps.
You will own nothing, you will have nothing, and you will be happy, or you'll go to a camp.
I also want to touch on the meme that Alex dropped at the end there, the you will have nothing and you'll be happy thing.
This is something that's really caught on among shithead skeptics who don't actually want to put any work in but want to present themselves as competent news and politics critics.
I'm talking about people like Rogan and Russell Brand.
Brand has made multiple videos where this slogan is used in a nightmarish way to characterize the great reset conspiracy that he's hard at work making his millions of fans scared about.
Schwab never said you will own nothing and you'll be happy.
That's not a quote.
It's a paraphrasing of something that was written by Danish MP Ida Aachen in 2016.
Ida was envisioning what life might be like in 2030, and part of that vision was that things that had historically been seen as products were now services.
This essay is a little bit far-fetched, but the essential premise is that innovation and technological advancement will have made everything so available and abundant that there's no real reason to own anything anymore since everything will be free.
From the essay, quote, first communication became digitized and free to everyone.
Then, when clean energy became free, things started to move quickly.
Transportation dropped dramatically in price.
It made no sense for us to own cars anymore because we could call a driverless vehicle or flying car for longer journeys within minutes.
There are also aspects of this vision that are kind of dumb inasmuch as they seem incredibly inefficient.
For instance, this part: quote, once in a while, I will choose to cook for myself.
It's easy.
The necessary kitchen equipment is delivered at my door within minutes.
Since transport became free, we've stopped having all those things stuffed in our home.
Why keep a pasta maker or crepe cooker crammed in our cupboards?
We can just order them when we need them.
That seems like a step backwards in terms of efficiency.
They're desperate to portray their imagined enemies as parental figures for them to lash out at because in some way I feel like that's the only way they can experience the world.
I understand that and appreciate it, but I do feel like there's a certain aspect to it that it's like, I didn't realize, I realized that this kind of psychological phenomenon or whatever can have an impact.
So I was very tired yesterday and I was going to bed early about 9 o'clock and my phone started blowing up by a lot of well-known talk show hosts and folks calling me and texting me saying, did you see Biden?
Did you see Biden?
Did you see Biden call for a new world order?
And I said, no, I'm going to see it now.
So I got up, got a glass of water, got in front of the big screen computer.
And this is me grasping at straws to build up a case because Alex's petty fascism is boring.
It's honestly bizarre for Alex to say that he heard about this clip at 9 p.m. because of some texts from a person he's clearly trying to imply is Tucker, the most important person in the world.
That speech Biden gave was a little bit earlier in the day, and it was going around like wildfire in the right-wing and conspiracy information spaces immediately.
I texted you at like seven.
So I imagine Alex is like, it's over two hours behind.
Now, simultaneously, we have the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN.
I have articles here today specifically saying I talk about a new world order and that it's hateful and bad and that it doesn't exist and that I should be taken off the air.
Their latest article was, America has a free speech problem in the New York Times on Friday because they don't want us discussing the future of the world.
Remember what I played yesterday?
Claude Schwab says, we will decide the future of the humans.
More importantly, though, people criticize Alex because he makes shit up.
And then he uses the idea of a new world order to push incredibly hateful political positions to deny acts of right-wing terrorism in general and then target marginalized and vulnerable populations.
It's a meaningful distinction, but I don't expect Alex to ever recognize it publicly.
Also, that New York Times article Alex is talking about actually says the opposite of what he's claiming it does.
The way he's talking about it reveals that he's literally just read the headline and assumed that it must be about how free speech is a problem because it allows Alex to say the things that he does.
He couldn't have even read the first two paragraphs without realizing that this article is saying the opposite.
Quote, for all the tolerance and enlightenment that modern society claims, Americans are losing hold of a fundamental right as citizens of a free country, the right to speak their minds and voice their opinions in public without fear of being shamed or shunned.
This social silencing, the depluralization of America, has been evident for years, but dealing with it stirs yet even more fear.
It feels like a third rail, dangerous.
For a strong nation and open society, that is dangerous.
So Alex has a guest coming up towards the end of the show.
And I think in terms of the sort of person you would want to come speak on the sort of topics that he's covering, I mean, it's just, this is a slam dunk.
I have Dow joining us the third hour to talk about Daily Mail articles and others release by the government in the UK.
Hospitals bribed to put patients on path to death to kill people.
Cash incentives for NHS trust that meets targets on Liverpool Care Pathway.
That's why they ordered massive amounts of a euthanasia drug given in lethal injection in the U.S. to be given to hundreds of thousands of old people they killed.
If you give somebody a shot of it that has pneumonia, they always die.
So that headline that Alex is reading from the Daily Mail, hospitals bribed to put patients on pathway to death, that's not an article about COVID or anything current like he's reporting it.
It's from 2012, and the article is more complicated than what Alex is presenting.
This has to do with the NIHS having targets of between one-third and two-thirds of the deaths that occur in a hospital being on what's known as the Liverpool Care Pathway.
The LCP is a protocol that is used for patients who are at end of life and determined to be terminal cases.
And it's essentially a way that doctors attempted to provide hospice-type care in a hospital setting.
Once a patient was deemed to be terminal and there was no longer any treatment options, they would receive palliative care to relieve pain and such, but typically that patient would end up dying.
This wasn't so much that the hospitals were killing these patients as much as it was a case where end-of-life care was being done in a manner that seemed a bit detached and bureaucratic.
The fact that there was a target range of deaths that should involve the LCP and the fact that funding was attached to being in line with these targets, it really gave the air of impropriety, even though no wrongdoing was necessarily being done.
So they don't feel a review found that when implemented well, the LCP is a good way to handle end-of-life care at a hospital setting.
And in fact, it appeared that the existence of the pathway made it much more clear to families of patients that their loved one was at the end of their life and allowed them to act accordingly.
The rest of that stuff is just bullshit ranging from transphobia to Alex mischaracterizing articles about how owning a pet is bad for the environment, mostly because of the dynamics involved in pet food production.
But you can see, again, in returning to this drumbeat of the you'll own nothing and you'll be happy.
He said that a bunch of the past, but not as regularly as he is now.
And I suspect that he's seen the success that folks like Russell Brand have had with using that as a mantra.
And Alex wants to signal to those audiences and try and say, hey, I'm doing it too.
They're all like a fucking choose your, they're a build-a-character in a fucking RPG where you just adjust the stats a little bit and you come out with these two.
Just right off the top, you can tell that this was an improvised list that Alex was riffing because transhumanism is not its own thing.
It's a facet of the globalists' plan.
According to everything Alex has ever said about this topic in globalists, transhumanism is an essential element of their whole scheme where they're trying to merge with machines and become God.
It seems strange that he added them in as a distinct group, but I think he did that because he realized how clearly his Christian identity nationalism was coming through.
You know, he's like, oh, Christianity good, Islam bad.
And you have Christendom, which apparently is the true plan to unite humanity, according to unnamed mass psychologists who Alex could definitely name if he wanted to.
This raises some really troubling questions.
And I guess the first is, what does Alex mean by saying Russia wants to be left alone, but they also want a new world order?
That's the problem with every single person who's ever thought about the idea of an isolated nation in the current global structure is that if you want to be an isolated nation, there can be no other nations.
So you either have the entire world or everyone else is dead.
He doesn't care if you believe in God or Christ or not, so long as he's able to assert power over you because he does, so long as you have to submit.
I can't hear things like this and not just think that Alex is losing even more of his grip.
And he's being a bit too overt with his desires.
Like, he wants to see a world characterized by Christian theocracy, and he sees Putin as the person who's most likely to usher that in, which probably explains a fair amount of his more recent content.
But China is Transhumanist system as well, but they're not following the neoliberal model of feminizing boys, sterilizing boys and girls, and destroying basic human civilization.
The Chikoms and the Russians have broken with that arm of the transhumanist system that seeks to fully end humanity, and they just believe they're going to merge and augment with the technology.
If you were at a table with billionaires and at the table with Bilderberg group members, and if you were having an adult discussion, that's what you'd be talking about.
Those are the type of discussions I've had with all sorts of groups: intelligence heads, Bilderberg group members, people worth $50 million, you know, science division heads, heads of heart, heads of major programs.
I'm not trying to brag here, folks.
I mean, I've been doing this 28 years, and I really study this all day.
So I get to be at the table, even though most of the globalists don't like me.
Alex isn't talking to anyone who's not insane themselves.
And you can tell by the guests that he has on his show.
They're all lunatics, and most of them are lying about their credentials.
Alex had Steve Pieczenik on his show for 20 years and never seriously asked himself if this dude was nuts and a liar.
If you were actually like a big serious person, you'd never associate with Alex because you can easily see the company that he keeps and how he behaves.
He's an untrustworthy idiot who's unpredictable and he's surrounded by white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and parody-level con men.
I do feel a certain amount of pity for anyone who could hear that and take it seriously because this is just Alex's child brain lashing out again.
He knows he doesn't deserve to be taken seriously, so he's creating a comical explanation for how seriously he's taken by imaginary bigwigs that totally exist.
And they probably hang out with mass psychologists.
It's just, this is just an attempt to be seen by the audience in a certain way because Alex knows that on the merits, he doesn't deserve to be treated like that or seen that way at all.
From the laws, immune from the system, and protect myself for a short period of time from what's coming and lie to myself and say, I could go along with the great culling and this operation, and then my family will be safe.
You really think you'll be safe joining with this?
The few thousand of you that are actually in it and the millions that serve it that think they're going to get a ticket to Valhalla, to Elysium?
No, it's a fraud.
It's a lie.
The life extension is a lie.
All of it's a fraud.
We are in a countdown to destroying the planet.
There's a short compilation of just a few world leaders talking about the new world order and world government and what it means.
I wonder if joining the New World Order would make it so Alex wouldn't have to come up with embarrassing excuses to not have to go to a deposition in the case that he's already lost about defaming the families of murdered children.
If so, maybe he should try that because I don't know what other option he has left.
So it's supposed to point these evil statements, you know, about the horror of the New World Order.
But so far, it just sounds like someone describing how there's a change in the status quo that's happening as it relates to international power balances.
I'm going to go through each of these clips one by one in this compilation.
And the reason I'm doing this is because I need to drive home the point that the entire notion of this New World Order stuff being some kind of an actual evil conspiracy plot isn't based on anything other than manipulative optics.
That and historical anti-Semitism, going back to things like the protocols, but a lot of manipulative optics, too.
So here's the next clip, which is Biden again.
And this time it's from a 2013 speech he gave at the annual conference of the Export-Import Bank.
You understand, almost better than anyone, the sheer potential this global economy affords the United States of America.
And you are well aware of the challenges as well.
This is a familiar story.
In the post-war era, post-World War II era, we faced a slightly different set of challenges.
As the global economy re-emerged from the destructions of war, we knew that institutions and roles were needed to navigate through this new world order.
And because our parents and grandparents were wise and because they were committed, we did what we've always done best.
Alex didn't use this clip, even though it does involve Biden saying New World Order, because to do so would undercut the point that Alex is trying to make.
To be fully honest, I'm sure Alex has never listened to this speech and has no idea where the clip is even from.
Someone just sent him a fear-mongering compilation or these pieces to his employees, put it together, and they played it, but the point is the same for whoever decided to include this clip just ignoring the other one because it doesn't work.
If all you have is an out-of-context presentation to Biden saying that we need to build a new world order that could have come from any period of time and your brain can imagine that it's related to whatever you want to pretend it's related to, that only works out of context.
Conversely, if you hear the full speech and you see that he uses the words new world order to refer to the new world order that appeared in the aftermath of World War II, it makes it too clear that the new world order isn't a specific compound noun in this speech.
It's really just referring to the changing set of circumstances on the world stage, in this case in the field of economics and international trade, since he's speaking to the export-import bank.
The inclusion of this example in the compilation is a strong indication that this isn't making a sincere point.
It's just an attempt to use the image of people saying New World Order and make that into an argument, which it's not.
You know, it's not like we're eventually going to have our politicians all go like, so I think now that things are changing, we're going to be entering a new world.
A world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations.
When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders.
So we talked about this in depth during the endgame episodes, but this is George H.W. Bush announcing the beginning of the first Iraq War.
While announcing the war, that's no good.
No good.
That said, the use of the words New World Order in this speech are not nefarious.
If you read the full speech, it's very clear that this is a reference to the changing state of affairs between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
In fact, the line that's right before this in that speech, which is weirdly always cut out of these clips, is, quote, we have in this past year made great progress in ending the long era of conflict and Cold War.
Long story short, this was at the end of the Cold War in 1991, and that's what the term New World Order refers to.
The Old World Order was a state of standoff between the two largest superpowers in the world who would be too occupied with fighting each other to engage with the UN and their larger peacekeeping mission, and the UN would be too busy worrying about the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
You're free to scoff and disagree with the idea that the UN and the Gulf War were great in terms of peacekeeping, please do.
But that doesn't change the fact that Bush was not talking about a shadowy cabal and world government.
He was talking about a changing status quo between the United States and Russia, which brought about the new order of the world.
This is Kissinger, and I'm not going to spend any time defending him or his legacy, but this is a strange clip to use in this compilation.
This is from an interview he did with Charlie Rose in 2007.
And if you just use a nine-second clip, it kind of conveys the message Alex is trying to pretend it says, but this is misrepresenting the larger context.
If you just hear this clip, it sounds like Kissinger is saying that it will have different characteristics in different parts of the world, and that it is implied to be the new world order, understood to be a one-world government.
But that's not what he's saying.
Just prior to this clip, Rose is asking him about the Iraq war and if the way it was carried out should be understood as revealing the limits of American power, and if given the considerations of so many regions in the world, like states in the Middle East, the rising power of China, was there a need for a new world order?
Kissinger was saying yes, that there was a change in dynamics that was on the horizon, but that it would play out differently in different parts of the world.
In terms of things Henry Kissinger has said, this is a fairly benign comment.
So this is a little sliver of a speech that former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown gave in front of the Confederation of British Industry Conference, their conference.
It's unclear what year this is from because conspiracy sites online claim that it's from 2007, but I found a transcript of the speech that he gave that year at the CBI, and it doesn't match this one.
So I have some doubts about that.
It's actually really frustrating because the backdrop behind Brown is definitely from CBI, but it's also not the backdrop that matches what the conference used in 2007 nor any other years that I can find videos from.
I've been able to find Brown's speeches from other years that he was there, and none of them match this other, and it's a real picture.
If you read any of his speeches, he throws that shit around like it's going out of style.
Here's an excerpt from another one of his speeches from 2007.
So you can see how nefarious and scary this stuff is.
Quote, our task as government leaders, and this is why the theme of the conference is so timely, is to engage the citizens of our countries in discussing and then implementing with their active imagination the new policy program that ensures that the benefits of this emerging new world order can be shared not just by some, but by all.
So there's a reason for him to be there, but it's very weird.
One thing I want to point out is that if you watch this full interview, it's fucking insane.
The interviewer is discussing the ongoing hostilities between Israel and Palestine, and she asks if it's all going to stop after Obama gets inaugurated for his first term.
She is straight up asking if the fighting in Gaza is something that's being orchestrated by Obama for political gain.
So this clip comes after Kissinger has asked a strange question about what country's relationship with the United States will define Obama's presidency.
It's such a weird question that I'm just going to play it and Kissinger's response so you can sort of get the full context.
unidentified
What do you think the most important thing is for Barack Obama?
Obviously, you're here to talk about the anniversary for U.S.-China diplomatic relations, but if you had to say this is going to be the country or the conflict or the place that will define the Obama administration, what would it be?
So this is a clip from a speech that Herman von Rompy gave after he was elected as the first president of the European Council.
Prior to this point, there was a six-month rotation of presidents where whichever country was president of the EU for that six-month chunk, they also held the ceremonial position of president of the council.
Von Rumpe isn't talking about global government per se, and he didn't even say New World Order in that clip.
He's talking about international cooperation that was prompted by the worldwide economic crash of 2007-2008.
When he says that the G20 was formed in 2009, that's not accurate.
It was formed in 1999, but in 2008, in response to the global financial crisis, they decided that they should have annual meetings and that they would be the body where the primary economic cooperation conversations happened.
Prior to this, that was mostly the role of the G8, but in the wake of the financial crisis, people recognized that there were other countries.
Yeah, the interconnectedness of world economies had more important actors in it than just those eight.
The reason that Rumpe says that this is the first year of global governance is because the EU isn't a member of the G8.
Individual EU states are members, but the body itself is not.
Conversely, the EU is a member of the G20.
What Rumpe is saying is not that this is the first year of global governance, it's that the forum where international economic cooperation conversations happen is now the body that the EU, which he was just elected president of, is included in.
This one, it sounds the closest to making Alex's point, but if you know a little bit about the situation and the context of what Rumpe is saying, this clip doesn't say what Alex is presenting it as saying at all.
And they use that plan to create crises, to consolidate control, to bankrupt you, to make you poor in steps until you can be starved to death and killed.
So we have Soros on some interview show saying that a global system is in the works with absolutely no context about what's being discussed.
I think at this point, you can see the game that's being played here and how all of these clips are meant to come at you fast and without any surrounding context.
If you're overwhelmed by what appears to be a ton of powerful people saying that there's a new world order afoot and then Alex comes back in the studio and says that this is their plan to kill you, you might just accept him at his word.
However, if you, like conspiracy theorists love to say, do your research and take a little bit of time to ask the question of where these clips came from and what's the context, you'll easily see that the conclusion Alex tacks on there at the end about this being a plan to kill you is laughable.
This compilation doesn't establish or build to this conclusion at all.
It's just smoke and mirrors because that's all this shit is.
I really, really despise those types of slogans because you know that they're just like, they're what you hear before the boot stomps on your face, like that kind of shit.
Like, they're taking everything away from us as right before they shoot you.
Before I die, I have to say, wait, one second, you realize the, and then I'm dead.
Let me tell you, when I go to a liberal area of Austin or LA or San Francisco or Seattle or New York, I don't drive by and look at the ghostly looking people, the ghoulish eyes, how unalive they are, how stupid they are, how weak they are, how scared they are, and feel powerful myself.
It makes me feel weak to see my fellow humans in that condition.
But for the globalists, when they see the homeless shelters and the needles and the trendies offering their children up to pedophile story time, they feel powerful.
They've broken your life force and broken your will.
But by just opening up to God and saying, save me, help me, take me to the infinite.
I want to be good and strong.
I believe in goodness.
You will begin to elevate your spirit.
Literally, electrochemically, it will manifest into a higher vibration.
If I understand correctly, science says that if you drop down on your knees and accept Jesus Christ into your heart, then you will, of course, begin to accelerate to a higher plane on a different vibration.
But they know that we manifest what we believe in.
So they tell us you own nothing.
You have nothing.
You're a failure.
You're ugly.
You're going to eat bugs.
And you get used to that.
Your mind starts becoming comfortable with it.
Instead of, I will not eat your bugs.
And I will have children.
And we will colonize space.
And we will transcend your new world order.
And God is real.
And you are not God.
And we are not under your control.
We're under God's control.
And we choose liberty and justice and freedom.
Incredible.
We're going to go to break.
I want to encourage listeners to understand that the heat of the battle for InfoWars is here.
Plus, we have great products.
If you're ever going to buy a book, a film, a t-shirt, is now the time.
We're selling out of t-shirts, even at below cost, some of them, at 75% off, because we've got to get all the funds in we can right now with some underges we have.
So 25 to 75% off on things like VASO beats that are back in stock.
I would say that if this is accurate at all, what Alex is talking about, things are looking real bad.
Things are real bad.
If he's selling out things at prices that are undercost because he can't make operating expenses, the goose is basically cooked.
I guess he could sell out all his shit and then maybe it puts a band-aid on things for a bit, but this problem isn't going to go away because ultimately this propaganda platform is a model that's doomed to fail.
Actually, Alex's propaganda platform is a great example of how sometimes growth can be bad.
If he'd stayed humble and kept things in the mid-range, like where he was in 2008 or 2012, yelling about how Ron Paul should have won the primary and showing up at places with a bullhorn every once in a while, he could have been comfortable to rich probably for the rest of his life, and he would have been able to continue to pretend to fight an infowar against imaginary enemies.
The growth is what's killing Alex.
It's the overhead and the expenses and the worthless employees on his payroll.
A propagandist doesn't need that kind of hassles.
A propagandist is born to run free, bullhorn in hand, making up shit about books he's never read.
This, a man selling his wares at a loss just so he can afford to pay a dork like Harrison Smith to host a pointless show to pad out the content he's putting out, that's a debasement.
That is no good.
This is not how God intended a propagandist to live.
Also, something in that clip stuck out to me where Alex said, we're not under your control.
We're under God's control and we choose liberty and justice and freedom.
That thought is completely nonsensical.
How does one choose freedom if they're under a deity's control?
If you're under someone's control, that means you don't have free will and thus you can't choose anything, let alone choosing to be free, which is a confounding idea.
But of course, Alex believes that God is a free will kind of God.
So maybe being under his control is to have free will.
But in that case, what does it even mean to have free will?
Pretty much nothing.
That would tend to imply that people who aren't under God's control don't have free will.
But then how can they possibly be condemned for the fact that they're not under God's control?
Maybe I should submit and maybe we should all go out today with hatchets and kill our dogs in the backyards and our cats because it's to save the earth, right?
We're supposed to give up everything we've got because we're bad.
We're guilty because we have dogs and cats.
We're guilty because we have children.
We're evil.
But none of that's even true.
It's all a greedy group of monsters that want you to learn to hate yourself so you roll over into the ditch of history so they can steal the future.
They're projecting their globalist hatred of themselves onto you and I. All the beautiful, nice things they have and the science they have came from the commoners, came from the people.
We built all this.
And now they've got their robots coming online, and they say they don't need us anymore, and we're supposed to just hate ourselves and go commit collective suicide.
And the World Economic Forum, I want to apologize to Bloomberg, the owner, the billionaire owner of Bloomberg and the publication, and the BBC and all the other groups that came out yesterday and said we should kill our dogs and cats to save the earth and to cut our carbon footprint and to stop Vladimir Putin.
They actually said that, and I came out against that and was wrong.
I have never seen this level of preparation on Alex's show.
The idea that he's in the middle of what appears to be a rant about something and then it throws to a video about the same subject that he did in advance.
Like he prepared this.
That's, I mean, it's really a low bar, but it's impressive for him.
Somebody had accidentally overlaid the broadcast with an old video or something.
Or maybe they had like hit the, they'd run out of the five-second delay after he started talking about killing pets and then it got real weird, you know, and they just cut away.
So in the tweet, it said that you should replace meat with lentils, but the article actually just said it suggested meat substitutes, like vegetables, lentils, or beans.
So you can see that there's just like essential detail that's missing from the tweet.
So another suggestion that's in the article is to, quote, rethink those costly pet medical needs.
This wasn't saying that you should kill your pet or that you shouldn't take your pet to the vet, but that some expenses related to pets might not be good expenses.
The next line in the article is, quote, it may sound harsh, but researchers actually don't recommend pet chemotherapy, which can cost up to $10,000 for ethical reasons.
Even though this article sucks and it was rightly commented on by Twitter, it's really obvious that Alex is creating a fake version of it to get mad at, saying that they're telling you to kill your pets.
Now, the two things that are problematic about this clip are one, Alex is supposed to be in the grips of some really serious emergency situation with his health, and he has to avoid any stretch, stress.
But here he is on air getting himself worked up, whether genuinely or as a performance, which would be pretty bad for his blood pressure.
So, look, the second hour, there's a lot of time spent with Alex interviewing his former employee, Savannah Hernandez.
Here's what happened.
She got kicked off Twitter after posting some videos of her interviewing people about how unfair it is that Leah Thomas is allowed to compete in women's swimming.
Savannah Hernandez will be joining us at the bottom of the hour to break down some really huge news.
One of the swimmers that filed a complaint that she didn't like a man, literally a foot plus taller than other women, being able to take over and win.
Well, she's been suspended off Twitter and Savannah got an interview before that even happened, whether that got her, I guess, suspended or speaking out got her suspended.
I don't recommend pursuing this line of thinking to its logical conclusion because it doesn't go anywhere good.
The second thing that Alex has wrong here is that the person Savannah was interviewing didn't get kicked off Twitter.
Savannah did.
This is the entire reason this is a story and why Alex would be having Savannah on.
She's doing a right-wing media blitz to strike while the iron's hot and her victimhood argument is fresh in people's minds.
It's honestly bizarre that Alex doesn't even seem to understand the premise of the interview he's agreed to do on his show.
He has literally no preparation for this at all.
Anyway, like I said, and you said this interview is just transphobia.
That's pure.
That's all that's going on here.
It's basically concern trolling, too, where these folks attempt to mask their underlying intense bigotry behind a pretend sincere concern about women's swimming.
I mean, and not just that, but simply because like Bill Burr made the transphobic joke that everybody's been dining out on on the far right like 10 years ago in one of his specials.
And it was done in a completely different context to make it look like he's the idiot for having this kind of thought process whatsoever.
But fuck it.
They're just going to do the same fucking bullshit because it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter what it is.
If it's not sports, it's there.
They shouldn't be in the bathrooms.
If it's not the bathrooms, they shouldn't be in the same restaurants.
So if you're somebody who's had his lawyer contact court and say that you have a serious emergency medical condition, I would say you probably wouldn't want to then go to work and do a ridiculous pageant of a show the next day, right?
Maybe.
And definitely, if you did do that, you probably wouldn't want to say on air that you're going to come back and do another show that evening.
We're going to have a special live InfoWars broadcast tonight from at least seven to nine commercial free to take phone calls on the great reset on the new world order.
I don't know what you think we should do as callers to stop this.
They're publicly announcing the NIH, what we already knew, but now admitted, paid to have them give people these assisted suicide drugs that they bought a bunch of right before the pandemic record levels.
And we know the same thing here.
Give them morphine.
Don't give them treatment.
Watch them die.
But to read this, here's the headline.
Hospitals bribed to put patients on pathway to death, cash incentives by the National Health Service Trust that meet targets on Liverpool Care Pathway.
Alex's central piece of evidence in covering this story seems to be this article about the Liverpool Care Pathway, which Alex is pretending is a current story and has to do with the pandemic.
He obviously forgot to check the date on the article he's reading.
He didn't look into this at all, so he has no idea it's a decade-old story and that the LCP was phased out in 2013.
I don't know how else to put this.
This shit's embarrassing.
If Alex cared at all about the quality of the work he's doing, realizing that he fucked this up that bad should be a huge issue for him.
He should do a big segment on the next episode about how important it is to check dates on stories and how he had it wrong and that they weren't giving people assisted suicide drugs.
But Alex doesn't have to do any of that.
His audience accepts whatever trash he gives them.
I think what I'm trying to get at, what I'm trying to stress, is that like there may have been a time when listening to Alex Jones could give you like maybe 0.01 value.