Today, Dan and Jordan check in on how Alex is doing while he waits for the jury to return with a verdict. In this installment, Alex reveals that his cousin is an arsonist, announces that everyone's losing their job in a few weeks, and celebrates Kanye saying his name on Tucker. Citations
My bright spot today, Jordan, is I took a little walk down to the mailbox to drop off some buttons that will be making their way all around this great world of ours.
And I'm walking back to my house.
I see a corner store, and I decide I'm going to go wander in there, see if I can find a good snack.
So you almost, people who are just listening to this don't know, but almost every time we do an episode, you have an Arnold Palmer half and half iced tea.
I do imagine a fun scenario where, you know, because when someone has the ball and they're trying to tag someone and they can run back to the base and they're throwing a pickle.
I imagine that, but the runner would be able to go all the way back to first.
I imagine, I think I would prefer if this was more modern day, and it was a bad pitcher that everybody knew was bad, and he somehow convinced the outfield and the infield to get off the field.
That's true, but he's also got an attention model, or a business model that's so based around capturing attention.
Absolutely.
I feel like he wouldn't behave the same way in previous eras of his career.
His information would be just as bad, but he wouldn't be so annoyingly chasing down X, Y, or Z meme that he wants to try and get a little bit of attention off of.
I hate to say that it's beneath him because it's not.
Part of the reason that he can get away with saying that, or he could get away with saying he was above the left-right paradigm was not necessarily his political beliefs.
It was also the complete lack of care that he gave towards, like, all of a sudden he'd just be like, hey, listen.
Turn this track up.
You know, like, yeah, you're above the left-right paradigm.
You're just having a good time singing along to a song.
He gave the feeling, if you're at a negotiating table with Alex about whether or not to listen to his show, back then, he would have been able to walk away from the table, you know?
He would have been like, Fuck you.
Don't listen to my show.
But now he's kind of got that, like, okay, you don't like it now, but how about this?
I talked to a lot of people Friday, Saturday, and then today.
In different levels of government and corporations.
And I called them to ask them what intel they had on the economy.
And they all gave me similar answers.
And I do have some big breaking news that I'm going to be laying out here today.
But here's just one of the pieces.
Well, I'm going to get to it later.
This is pretty delicate stuff.
What?
I don't want to announce these major layoffs that are about to happen across the US in the next two weeks to scare people, but I am doing it so you know that our sources are real.
Because even though it's important to break this stuff, it feels dirty to let people know what's about to happen to their companies, even though I'm not at these companies, even though I'm not the one doing it.
All right, well, the person that he said was a member of the Rockefeller family was a guy who was pretending to be related to them, just happened to have the same last name.
They even got it down to the time frame and what years it would happen.
You know why?
Because they had worked at the highest levels of corporations and government, and they had people try to bring them into it to be part of it, including some people in my family who were patriots and said no.
And they took the big, powerful, high-paying jobs they had, and they went back to being farmers and auto mechanics and uninconvenient stores rather than be part of the evil.
And they had their souls and have their souls.
When I learned about this as a child, and then learned it was true as I grew up and saw it happening in the world...
It was very adventurous.
It was exciting to be battling the New World Order.
You could see them trying to launch their programs.
You could see the embryonic levels of what they built.
But now we're facing the full-grown New World Order.
It's not in beta anymore.
It's in full-blown attack mode.
So we're not going to have to wait around for it anymore.
Everybody's going to have to either find God or find the devil.
Because you're going to find one or the other, because that's what's going on here.
So I think that's a really revealing clip, and I fully believe Alex's telling of his younger years.
When he was a kid and his weirdo John Birch Society family members told him that they were involved in fighting a giant worldwide communist conspiracy that was being led by the devil.
I bet that was pretty exciting for him.
Your imagination and ability to immerse yourself in fantasies is very strong as a child, and it can be really fun to create elaborate games to try and escape the simplicity or boringness or shortcomings of your real life.
So the issue here is that Alex is still doing this.
He's a 48-year-old man, and he's never really gotten past that point of experiencing life like a child, casting himself as the crusading hero, saving the world from evil.
When you realize that Alex was just a kid role-playing fighting evil globalists, and now he's an adult role-playing fighting evil globalists, it's pretty easy to see that he's basically still that same child.
Let me put this this way.
Replace the evil globalists with pirates, and this dynamic becomes a little clearer about what Alex's maturity level is.
Because the backdrop of that terrible news and the terrible military news and the war news is some really good news.
I've got three stacks that I want to cover with the good news.
And they're all really splendid.
And it shows the people are waking up and taking action.
And it shows Newtonian physics is again being proven accurate for every action.
There's an opposite and equal reaction.
Or opposite and equal reaction.
So let me start getting into the good news first.
PayPal came out on Friday in their terms of service officially and said, if we don't like what you say or what you believe, we will fine you $2,500 per infraction.
There was a gigantic backlash and they revoked it and said, we're sorry.
We're not going to do it.
You mean for now.
So they've gotten away with so much for so long.
I told you, next is debanking.
Next is the universal basic income and the social credit score and total control.
When they snap their fingers and say jump, you say, yes sir, master, how high?
Here's the condensed version of what's going on here.
PayPal has certain rules about what their service cannot be used for.
For instance, you can't use it to pay assassins or sell drugs.
unidentified
In a version of their acceptable use policy, they included on their list of prohibited uses things that, quote, are fraudulent, promote misinformation, or are harmful.
This language was subsequently removed from the policy statement, which I guess Alex is taking credit for.
They never were going to fine you $2,500 for spreading misinformation.
This is a misreporting of their policy that relates to PayPal's ability to charge you $2,500 if you're sued for doing any of the prohibited activities when using their service.
This is essentially a flat rate per violation that they assess to protect themselves and recoup expenses that may come from you using PayPal to do things that they explicitly say you can't.
Anyway, the story is more useful to Alex the way he tells it, but...
Ironically, that's Alex spreading misinformation, which luckily won't get him fined by PayPal and wouldn't have before either, because this is a full-of-shit narrative.
They wouldn't be happy about that, because then people would be like, oh, you can use PayPal for fraud, and then the government would be like, you shouldn't be able to use PayPal for fraud.
Will, once we find our spine, once we find our huevos, once we find our ovaries, if you're a woman, once you find your brain, once you find your will, your survival instinct, this will all turn around real fast.
But not if it goes much further.
That's why I'm like, at the edge of a cliff here, we're all being pushed over, and I'm like, folks, we can turn around.
We don't have to do this.
And they're behind us trying to scare us to run off the edge of a cliff.
All we've got to do is say no and come back for air.
It's like they've hypnotized us, and we're at the bottom of a pool 10 feet under, and they've hypnotized us, and we think we can't swim to the surface.
Well, when we pass out, we're going to drown.
We've got time to swim back to the surface, but we've just got to decide to come out of the trance and go, hey, this is a bad idea.
I'm going to swim 10 feet to the surface.
It's so easy, but you've got to do it.
It's that easy, but you've got to decide.
These people are out to get you.
People are like, well, that's scary to admit we have predators and really evil people in command.
That's why in basic criminology, if you study it, it's very interesting.
Most victims of crime couldn't believe it was happening to them and didn't fight back or didn't even run and complied.
And corporations teach people, comply with crime.
Comply with robbers.
And of course, that just makes it worse and worse and worse.
When you don't comply with criminals, they're a scarce commodity and they live in fear.
That's why he thinks society would be perfect and polite if everyone was carrying a gun at all times, because to him, you can't be a victim if you're armed, which is also bullshit.
This is a disgusting mentality that Alex is espousing, masquerading as a message of empowerment.
Also, to touch on that point that he makes about corporations teaching you to comply with criminals like robbers, that's really important and good advice.
I've worked at a couple of gas stations in my life, and I was even robbed at gunpoint once, at one of them.
If you work in a setting like this, you will have your bosses tell you that if someone wants to rob you, go along with everything they're saying unless they want you to leave the store.
Then it becomes a completely different crime, and if you're looking at being kidnapped, you shouldn't comply with that.
But in the overwhelming majority of cases, the person robbing you doesn't want to hurt you.
They just want money, which is replaceable, and the store is likely insured anyway.
There's literally no point in fighting back and risking escalation to a situation where The same is true in a lot of stores.
Like, for instance, I worked at an office depot, and they very clearly told us that if the alarm goes off that someone left without paying for something, don't chase them.
In reality, there's an issue here where your employer doesn't want to get sued by your family if you're killed on the job, and taking a hit of whatever the robber gets away with from the till is small potatoes.
But, whatever the motivation, it's very weird that these bosses and corporations seem to care a lot more about your well-being than Alex.
Yeah, I suppose it seems like you're going to forgive any and all crimes, thus proving when Trump said that he could shoot a man on Fifth Avenue, he was 100% correct in regards to you, at least.
Ladapo on Friday released the state's analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, revealing an 84% increased risk of cardiac-related death among men 18 to 39. Florida will not be silent on the truth.
The guidance recommends the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for males 18 to 39 years old not be given.
In a statement...
The doctor said that the studying of the safety and the efficacy of any medication, including vaccines, is an important component of public health.
Far less attention has been paid to safety and the concerns of many individuals who've had been dismissed.
These are important findings that should be communicated to Floridians.
Well, that's to say the least.
The Florida Department of Health released the findings of a self-control, their own study, case series, Which they used to evaluate the safety of COVID vaccines, which studied mortality risk following mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations.
So the state itself signed up a bunch of people, didn't tell them what the study was, had them take the shot, because they were wanting it, to see what would happen.
That's what he's been doing in the last year since Governor DeSantis brought him in and said he's given full faith in him.
The Florida Surgeon General did say this, and this is a real press release, but the underlying study itself has some critical flaws with how it's designed to the point where one begins to question if it was a study seeking a particular conclusion as opposed to one looking to determine truth.
The data in the study does show an 84% increase in cardiac-related deaths in people who got mRNA vaccines, but there are some gigantic red flags that should make you never rely on this study to report that data.
The first is that the paper has no authors listed, which is really...
name is on this well I think they they don't have Alan Smithy yet I think is the problem second the paper has not been published anywhere nor has it been peer-reviewed in any way third and perhaps most troublingly the paper just used death certificates to define deaths thus deaths with a code of 130 through 152, which covers, quote, other forms of heart disease, are included.
This section of codes does include cardiac arrest, but the section doesn't cover a number of other heart-related outcomes that didn't make sense for them to exclude.
Dude.
It skews the data a bit.
Also, someone who has cardiac arrest on their death certificate may have died from something else that led to their heart stopping.
It's not precise enough to be helpful in this context at all for what they're trying to assert.
Fourth, the paper has some issues with who they included and did not include.
They claim that they excluded anyone who's been diagnosed with COVID, but in the limitations section, they say this.
This makes things very confusing.
They had no knowledge of the testing status of anyone who didn't die of or with COVID, but people who died of or with COVID were excluded from the study, which would seem to indicate that they had no idea if any of the people in the study had COVID.
And yes, it's a sad victory, but 99% of people, I showed you the statistics two weeks ago and again last week, are not taking the new Pfizer and Moderna booster shots.
99 less percent uptake and all over the place, the fake mandates of California and New York and other places are falling.
In Europe, the forced injections are failing.
They tried to intimidate and bum rush and panic and bully everyone into submission, but it didn't work.
Some took it.
But the victory we've had now is massive.
People are really waking up.
It's very sad for those that took the poison shots.
There are some mitigating factors.
We've got a lot of scientists and doctors coming on.
The next few weeks we'll talk about how you can try to mitigate if you did take the shot.
We're not judging anybody that got intimidated into doing it.
Bullied and beat over the head into submitting to it.
Whatever the case, I want to take a second here to point out this new trend in Alex's show.
It feels to me like this signals his growing disinterest in COVID conspiracies.
He's yelled literally every day about a new piece of information that proves conclusively that he's right about everything so you can kind of see how he wouldn't have much more territory to cover on that front.
So you need to find a new way to keep moving, and eventually everyone's going to get bored of the COVID narrative of the day.
It's stale, repetitive, and you're really preaching to the choir.
The audience already thinks the vaccine's a death shot, so proving that over and over again is just monotonous.
However, with Alex Lee Moyer's dumb movie, and Glenn Greenwald's glowing review, and the mileage that he's been able to get out of things like that Channel 5 interview, and his book release, and the attention that he's getting from the trial, I wouldn't be surprised if Alex was seeing some new eyes.
If you have a new initiate and you make them scared of this death vaccine that's killing millions that they've already taken and there's no solution, it's going to be hard to make money off them.
Conversely, if you start to come up with cures and solutions to protect yourself if you've been vaccinated, then you can create this intense fear about the vaccine and then sell people a placebo to alleviate those fears.
It's strange for Alex to be defending Peter Thiel, although he has done that a little bit recently, but that's not what I'm catching on this clip.
The thing that stands out to me is that someone, or multiple someones, called Alex and blamed Peter Thiel for this rule at PayPal, which Alex had to refute.
Now, why would that happen?
Why would people call Alex and say, hey, this rule at PayPal is bad, why is Peter Thiel allowing this?
It seems to indicate that these people calling Alex understand some kind of a connection between the two of them.
about this particular situation is because so few people would be capable of making it possible In the game of Guess Who, we've taken out a lot of those things real quick, you know?
So, look, I have nothing but empathy for people suffering mental anguish, and I want to be clear about that.
But I also think that there's a line.
I still can feel for people who are acting out in manic outbursts, but when the things that they're saying or doing are destructive, and they've had multiple opportunities to get help and have the resources to do so, the primary concern that I have shifts from their well-being to the damage that their actions can have on others.
Kanye is well past that line, but...
It isn't really too often that he comes up in our travels because Alex has a dicey history with Kanye.
When he was first doing his I like Trump thing and hanging out with Candace Owens, Alex had Owens on the show as a guest from time to time.
And I think that Alex thought Kanye was...
was going to come on, and that never happened.
But Kanye wore a MAGA hat, so Alex liked him, and everything was well.
Sure.
unidentified
Then, in July 2020, Alex got mad at him because Kanye did an interview that publicly announced his split from Trump, which wasn't cool, so close to the election particularly.
But now Kanye's doing attention-grabbing nonsense in public again and talking to Tucker about it, so it's a pretty safe bet that Alex is back to thinking that Kanye's pretty alright after all.
The shirts weren't fashionable, per se, and the only real statement that was made is going to be received with eye rolls by most and riotous celebration by the right-wing media.
Kanye is now embattled by the woke mob, according to outlets like Fox, because he dared to wear this shirt as a brave and artistic...
I'm not sure if this is true or if any woke mobs are embattling him.
I kind of think that most people's response to his stunt was along the lines of, oh, this is happening again.
Wearing a White Lives Matter shirt while hanging out with Candace Owens is going to be viewed as racist-type behavior by some, but at this point, we're four years past the point where he didn't interview and said that slavery was a choice.
Kanye did get some negative feedback from his shirt, coming from P. Diddy, of all people.
The man who enters through the Diddy door texted Kanye, which we know about because Kanye posted a picture of the texts on Instagram.
Kanye apparently wrote Diddy saying, quote, I didn't like our convo.
I'm selling these teas.
Nobody can get in between me and my money.
Never call me with no bullshit like that again unless you're ready to greenlight me.
Because anybody that got on that tea is me.
This brings up an important point, and that is that Kanye is selling these shirts.
So at its core, this is basically just a publicity stunt.
He followed this with another tweet saying, quote, who you think created cancel culture?
People really didn't enjoy this, seeing as it's essentially swimming in anti-Semitic tropes, and this is really just a stone's throw away from Holocaust denial.
To recap, this was an episode that began with him wearing a racist trolling t-shirt to a fashion show with racist troll Candace Owens, and ended up with him publicly declaring that he's going to war with the Jews.
I think people would be shocked if they started scratching their favorite hip-hop artists to discover how many of them are interested or dabbling in black Israelism.
In the middle of all of this, Kanye sat down with Tucker Carlson and did an interview that's a bit painful to watch.
It takes a certain level of scumbag to exploit somebody who's clearly unwell, and it turns out Tucker is right at that level.
You kind of expect that desperate grifters like Owens would take any opportunity to attach themselves to Kanye, regardless of the context, because it gets their name in the media.
Someone like Tucker, you kind of hope that he'd realize that he doesn't always need to press.
Like, he's a big enough star, and he's effective enough at pushing his talking points that interviewing Kanye is more of a liability than it is an opportunity.
For instance, what if, like, a day or two after your interview, your interview subject who you spent two days of your show arguing is sane and an insightful person declares that he's going to war with the Jews?
What then?
Or even worse, what if it comes out that he said that kind of stuff in your interview, but you cut it out of the finished product to make it all more palatable for your audience?
Huh.
unidentified
What if footage of leaks that shows that you have...
And of course, Anna Merlin over at Vice, just today as we were recording this episode, she published an article where she had gotten a hold of unaired footage from the Kanye interview.
And as it turns out...
Tucker censored quite a bit that didn't fit the narrative of the story that he wanted to tell.
Like, for instance, he cut out, quote, numerous anti-Semitic sentiments.
Here's one of the clips that Vice provided that seems weird that Tucker wouldn't let him say this on the show.
Kanye also had some other less clearly hateful but equally detached from reality things to say that Tucker just decided his audience didn't need to know about, including a lengthy discussion about how he thought that a fake kid had been planted in his home to sexualize his children.
This was apparently a child of someone he knew who he became convinced was an actor.
We don't have audio of this because Vice chose to withhold the footage to respect the privacy of the child and their family, which I think is...
Tucker was sitting right there while Kanye rambled all this shit and cut it all out to launder the perspective Kanye was expressing into something that he could market to his audience.
Kanye's hatred for the left in support of Trump, his aggressive anti-abortion positions, and his vocal Christianity are very useful for Tucker, so long as the audience doesn't actually get all the information.
Tucker's whole game is that he's giving you this information so you can make up your own mind.
They say that Kanye is crazy because he wears a White Lives Matter shirt and loves Jesus, so we decided to talk to him to see for ourselves.
His music started sucking real bad and then he started doing the far right grift.
I'm not saying that people stopped buying his music because it sucked and then he went to the next most easy grift maybe imaginable for a guy like Kanye.
Kanye rambles about various pointless personal grievances and his divorce.
He talks a bit about political stuff, but goes off course quite a bit.
Watching it even before the Vice article came out, I got the strong sense that stuff was missing from this interview, and even so, it felt meandering.
It felt overly edited, but yet still not concise.
What I'm saying is that I don't recommend it.
It's kind of a dumb interview, particularly the part where Kanye complains about how the Democrats and the Clintons wanted to get to his wife so they could take advantage.
of Kanye's fame to push their messaging when he's sitting next to a guy who's doing exactly that just without his wife's involvement.
Yeah.
unidentified
At the end of day two of the interview series, Kanye briefly mentions Alex Jones.
That was Kanye recognizing that even if people think he's nuts, there's a further level of nuts that he could achieve, which is Alex Jones level.
And yeah, I would say he's on Alex Jones turf here, speculating that the Gap had advanced knowledge of the shooting.
I'm not even sure what that means.
Also, real quick, the reason that tons of news outlets sound the same in the immediate aftermath of a tragic event that's breaking news is because they're all reporting on the same very limited information that's been released by the authorities or witnesses.
And no one wants you to put ice on your head.
But the fact that you're mad that people less successful than you are concerned about your well-being means you should probably put some meds in your head.
But most of it really isn't germane to the matter here.
Where it intersects with our show is that tiny little mention of Alex and the fact that he was part of an anti-Semitic breakdown that's still ongoing and that folks like Alex and Tucker are actively covering for and enabling.
So beyond that, I don't know.
The interview is...
Take what you can from it, I guess.
If you want to watch it, you have two hours to throw away.
Hillary did a town hall that looked like it was shot in an 80-millimeter film.
Super HD, dust in the air you can see.
Kids asking her questions.
It looked like a movie.
It was produced so good that you could look at it and say, this isn't a town hall.
This looks like a movie.
How does she say it's a live town hall when it's all super HD, perfect cuts, perfect comments, no mics messing up, no audio problems, no video problems, no nothing.
You can look at something and say, that's high production.
We weren't saying that these events didn't happen.
We were saying this looks controlled, manipulated.
We should investigate this.
And it came out that it was not a live town hall Hillary had.
It was shot over a week with actors.
And that was mainstream news.
So you can see When something's synthetic.
Now, why did she script the town hall that she ran ads for and promoted everywhere?
Because she wanted it to look just right.
But the point was, we could see that it wasn't a live feed.
It wasn't real.
And I've used the analogy a lot of, everybody's walked in, usually it's a department store, you're buying a mattress, you're buying some pots and pans, and on like a table, they'll have fruit.
And you just look at it from 20 feet away, and you go, that's fake fruit.
You don't need to go pick it up.
You can look at it.
You just know it looks too good.
It looks too bright.
It just doesn't look right.
You know what a real pear looks like.
What a real apple looks like.
What a real orange looks like.
You know it's fake.
You walk over.
It's plastic.
You pick it up.
Yeah, that's fake.
That's all Kanye's saying.
And then it's coordinated.
And they don't want us looking into what are they doing.
Because we're not sure exactly what type of plastic the fruit's made out of.
For those of you who don't remember, Alex is basically creating an elaborate fantasy story out of the revelation in 2016 that Hillary took pre-screened questions at a town hall event, and one of them was asked by the then 15-year-old daughter of a state senator who happened to be a Democrat.
From there, Alex has extrapolated this out into being an entirely fake town hall, which I guess is evidence that school shootings are faked.
Now, if Alex wanted to really blow some minds with this conspiracy, the 15-year-old girl at that town hall was named Brennan Leach.
And if that name rings a bell, it's because she went on to be a Senate aide who was photographed transporting the electoral ballots on January 6th.
Some folks misreported that she and other aides were protecting these votes during the rioting, but in reality, it was a photo from the morning.
It proves that January 6th was a Clinton false flag, and the planning's been going on since that town hall when this kid asked a staged question to Hillary.
The point is that Alex's nonsense about this Clinton Town Hall is meaningless, and even if there is something to this, it doesn't justify any conclusions about the Uvalde shooting.
Also, I have at least two friends who have tried to eat plastic fruit when they were really drunk.
Considering how much of a boozer Alex is, this probably isn't the best analogy he could be making.
Given the things that Kanye's been saying, I don't think I would want to be taking credit for waking him up, nor would I want to say that my audience is responsible for it.
I understand the short-term gains that you can get from clout chasing here, but considering what Alex is saying, he should know what he's associating himself with.
Alex is clearly running cover for Kanye's anti-Semitic Instagram post here by implying that the Tucker interview and the White Lives Matter shirt is the reason that he's kicked off the platform instead of Kanye posting private messages between him and Diddy where he threatens to use him as an example to the Jewish people who told Diddy to contact him.
Alex knows what he's doing.
Kanye is useful in terms of giving the appearance of not being racist while simultaneously using his celebrity to push dumb extreme right-wing politics to a different audience.
And Alex knows that comes with the byproduct of spreading intense anti-Semitic ideas to that wide audience and promoting them to your own audience, at least tacitly, and Alex doesn't care at all.
This is probably at least partially due to the fact that Alex's ideology is underpinned by pretty similar anti-Semitic ideas.
Now, as for Candace Owens, Alex can claim that he woke her up, but she's been very public about her experience moving to the right, and it's due to Gamergate.
In high school, Candace received a settlement of over $37,000 when she sued the school board for failing to protect her from racist death threats and harassment.
Coincidentally, Norm Pattis was her lawyer.
In 2015, she started a website called Degree 180, where there was a blog full of anti-Trump and anti-Republican content.
So, you know, all around that side.
She followed this up in 2016 with a website called Social Autopsy, which was supposed to be a site where online bullies would be unmasked and their anonymity was taken away.
Everyone thought this was a terrible idea and would just lead to doxing and targeted harassment.
It's super easy to see the way that the site's concept could be used for evil, particularly when it's being run by someone with as Hmm.
Quinn, the target of a lot of the Gamergate harassment, apparently sent Owens a message warning her that this wasn't a good idea and she was likely to become the target of harassment herself if she followed through with this.
Unsurprisingly, Owens did start getting harassed and doxed, and she decided to create an evidence- Wow.
And just like that, Candace Owens became a right-wing con artist.
She took on the name Red Pill Black and then started working for Turning Point USA, which she continued to do until she made those comments back in 2018 about how Hitler would have been totally cool if he didn't have aspirations outside of Germany.
So weird how there's a high percentage of people Alex claims to have woken up who go on to do Nazi shit.
Anyway, once she became Red Pill Black, she was needing folks to help elevate her status in the Right-wing media scam, and Infowars was more than happy to platform her.
I would guess that in the interview she said something like, you were the one who woke me up to flatter and ingratiate herself with Alex, but she's been really consistent with her Gamergate Zoe Quinn story in other venues.
On Friday, PayPal came out with new terms of service.
And said, if we don't like what you say about a list of issues, global warming, open borders, gun control, election fraud, vaccines, you name it, anything that Bill Gates and his organizations and the Southern Property Law Center and the ADL says, you say anything we don't like that's true, of course, we're going to take $2,500 outside of law, outside of law, out of your account.
Now, the first thing I thought when I saw that once I got off air Friday, because I missed it, it broke in the morning, but I missed it, was this is the Global Social Credit Score.
But the second thing I thought was the most important point that nobody's been making until today.
And that's what frustrates this.
I don't want to do this all the time.
I don't have to.
People should get this.
They don't need me to tell them.
Folks, use your brains.
What's the big elephant in the room here with PayPal saying, if we don't like what you say, we're going to censor you?
Yeah, that's illegal.
Yeah, they're making themselves judge, jury, executioner.
Of this power grab, of this insanity, of this arrogance, of this tone deafness that they think they could just do this and get away with it when it's right out of the book of Revelations?
So this is where Alex's stupid misreporting of stories becomes creating stories out of whole cloth.
He doesn't understand the underlying story about PayPal and how this wasn't a fine they were going to charge you.
It was related to fees that would be placed in your account if you're sued for crimes that involve the platform.
Because Alex doesn't understand the underlying story here, and just as a loose grip on the headline he's read on a right-wing blog, he thinks that PayPal's gonna fine you $2,500 if you write a post on your blog that says that climate change isn't real.
Now, this introduces a problem.
How is PayPal going to know that you're blogging about unapproved things so they can fine you?
In order to accept the inaccurate and incorrect version of this story, there needs to be some mechanism in place for it to even work logistically, so Alex has written that part of the story for the audience, pulled straight from his imagination.
Consider how stupid all of this is if you believe Alex's version.
PayPal would have needed to set up a super expensive part-AI, part-manual system to monitor all of its users' behavior off-site to see if they're doing anything that they could get them fined.
That would require spying on like 400 million people, which would be really expensive.
It would be expensive to operate, but the infrastructure to do it would also take millions upon millions of dollars to set up.
So they sink all that money in, knowing that they're going to be able to recoup their losses with this fine system.
You know, they're going to start raking in that censorship cash.
But then, oh no, what's this?
The right-wing media is complaining about the terms of service.
And just like that, years of investment in an implementation of a worldwide censorship AI system has to be thrown out and the terms of service just go back to normal.
This is legitimately what's implied by Alex's narrative.
This is what you have to accept, whether you realize it or not, in order to take on Alex's version of the story, which is inaccurate because he didn't actually read the story or look into this at all, and he's just making shit up on the fly to freak out the listeners.
I mean, does Alex not think that maybe it would be limited to how you use PayPal as being the main deciding factor of whether or not they can cause a problem?
Like, they couldn't.
They could not be like, ah, one time on Twitter, you said something mean.
You can't use our platform to organize and gather an audience when off-platform what you're using that audience for is trying to go to DEFCON 3 with the Jews.
There's also some things that are clearly, alright, we know what you're doing.
Maybe it's not on platform, but we know what you're doing.
Let's say, for example, you started a GoFundMe, and you pretended that it was to get a surgery for your dog or whatever, but in reality, you were funding for a neo-Nazi newsletter that you wanted to put out.
So anyway, if you take the false version of this story and then exaggerate it the way that Alex does with the implications of his false story, it's a lot easier to get really angry about it.
PayPal came out and said, we're watching and surveilling you on our platform, what you're buying, what you're doing, who you're supporting, and we're watching you everywhere else.
The people that did it need to go to prison for the rest of their lives because they're a danger against everybody else, and they're run by the big banks that thought late in the year.
2022, it was a good time, long after they banned Alex Jones, to come out and say, listen, you dirty, filthy Americans, we're watching your ass.
And if you do one thing we don't like, we're going to fine you and kick you off our platform.
What a group of criminals.
But I'll tell you who's really pathetic.
It's us.
If we put up with crap like this and turn our world over to people like this, we deserve everything we've got.
I want to get to the transgender mafia that folks are waking up to.