Jimmy Dore’s Rumble Time revisits Alex Jones’ 2017 "Jimmy Bore" riff, now repackaged with weak jokes like mocking Nancy Pelosi’s post-Biden death quips and Chicago crime stats, despite mixed data. Jones pivots to Biden’s Las Vegas "medical emergency," falsely claiming Democratic sabotage, while Dore’s audience clings to Trump over Harris—despite his corporate ties—fearing establishment politics. Jones defends Trump as an outsider but dodges specifics, like healthcare or pardons, instead framing Democrats as puppets. Border security rants reveal his anti-immigrant hypocrisy, ignoring surveillance fears he once exploited. The episode exposes Dore’s show as a hollow mix of recycled grievances and Jones’ opportunistic, inconsistent conspiracy peddling, proving neither humor nor substance remain. [Automatically generated summary]
But I was watching it and I was thinking to myself.
So the hall brawl, for those who have not watched the challenge, is a hallway, an artificially created hallway where you're supposed to run at each other, and then one person comes out the other side and hits a bell and you get a point.
So that's pretty classic late-night monologue structure for a joke.
You know, nothing wrong with that.
Nothing too edgy or ambitious, but it follows the way you introduce a concept, then negate it in a slightly unexpected way.
Saying someone on the panel couldn't make it because they got shot isn't the most unexpected twist, but at least it's the territory of how a comic would write a joke.
The goal of a monologue joke like this is to lampoon what's being passed off as a sincere message.
Like back when Domino's was saying, ah, we fucked up.
Our pizza's better now.
You might go on stage and say something like, They made their pizza better.
They say that, but I called and ordered a large pepperoni, and you know what showed up?
A medium pie, no pepperoni, but a live pelican.
You're creating a bizarre image to delight the audience.
And the point behind what you're saying is that they didn't make the pizza better.
I'm not sure what Democrats Jimmy is citing who are saying that violent crime is down, but the reality of this is actually a pretty complicated question.
Data analyzed by the University of Chicago Crime Lab clearly shows that homicide is down year over year from 2021 to 22 to 23, and that non-fatal shootings have followed the same trajectory.
If you look at broader data from the Chicago Police Department statistics, you can see that there is an increase in aggravated batteries and theft, 10% and 6% respectively, at the time I'm preparing this episode.
And these represent challenges, but the rhetoric of there's crime everywhere is aimed at appealing to the law and order type policies, which have a long history of trending toward right-wing interests and initiatives that lead that direction.
We could look at the numbers and say that our approach to policing isn't necessarily working, and that's a fine position to hold.
But the big attack about Chicago is that everyone's getting shot and killed.
And Jimmy's joke is specifically that a member of the panel got shot, which is a crime that's down.
I think that you're supposed to understand this as a criticism of the system.
Sure.
But the whole like Chicago is dangerous and full of crime thing is a bit lazy.
And it's the framing of the joke is leading it in an intentional direction, and that is towards right-wing ideas about increased policing as opposed to different strategies and approaches towards policing that maybe would be more effective.
So actual crime rates don't reflect how people feel about what crime rates are.
Consistently, studies have shown that people overestimate the amount of crime that happens, generally because the news reports crimes and doesn't report a crime not happening.
Our perceptions have an underlying bias towards assuming more crime, regardless of what's actually happening.
Jimmy is playing into reassuring that bias instead of challenging it, which I feel is antithetical to the image that you want to cultivate as a firebrand truth teller.
Sure.
And so I just feel like the construction of this is meant in a way to exacerbate the feelings that lead towards right-wing views of policing as opposed to the alternative.
I think hearing the audience respond the way they do to the things that Jimmy's saying, the things that Jimmy's saying made me realize, like, oh, there's a whole lot of just the same right-wing grievance kind of based shit.
You know, the Secret Service is in town this week.
They have their work cut out for them this week because when a shooting starts, they have to figure out if it's an assassination attempt or just a robbery or a carjacking or a gang war or a migrant squatter.
So the inclusion of migrant squatter at the end of this list should tell you all you really need to know about how Jimmy is on board with the right-wing anti-immigrant hysteria.
Putting that as the tag at the end of this list is a choice that's right at home on Rumble.
Now, that list of crimes he mentions are assassination attempt, robbery, carjacking, gang war, and migrant squatter.
A migrant squatter isn't necessarily a crime, and robberies and carjackings don't necessarily include guns, but okay, we can work with this list.
I'm not sure how many gang wars there have been in the past year, since I don't think that's a statistic that's well kept.
But robbery and motor vehicle theft are actually two of the categories where the rates have gone down in 2024.
The last assassination attempt happened in rural Pennsylvania.
Two of these crime categories have gone down.
One is the plot of the Warriors, and the other is not a crime.
Yeah, because any bit about the Secret Service is going to have to wind up with counterfeiting.
Like, that's the joke of the Secret Service, is the inexplicability of them being tasked with protecting the president and also being like, hey, who's making fake money over here?
You know, like, that's where your bit goes.
Not like, because why would the Secret Service give a shit about a carjacking?
I don't know if this is true, but I heard if Biden wasn't going to drop out, that Nancy Pelosi threatened to 25th Amendment him, and she was going to switch out his doctors with Matthew Perry's doctors.
So incidentally, that guy who attacked Nancy Pelosi's husband with a hammer is doing 30 years in prison for that assault and 20 years of a concurrent sentence for attempted kidnapping because that's what his plan was.
He was sure that the 2020 election had been stolen, so he was going to kidnap Nancy Pelosi and hold her hostage to get the truth revealed.
From a KQED news article about that dude's trial, quote, he told the jury he came across most of his newfound political ideas after listening to mostly right-wing political YouTubers for entire weekends at a time and a minimum of six hours per day on weekdays, including James Lindsey, Jimmy Dore, and Glenn Beck.
If I were named in that trial as one of the radicalizing influences of the perpetrator, I think I might think it's a bit like a good idea to just keep it out of the riff catalog.
Man, this is wild because I don't know what funny is anymore.
Like, I haven't been on stage for, or well, you know, we've been on stage, but I haven't been on stage solo as a comic, you know, for a good four or five years, something like that.
Yeah, I mean, like, this, but it's what I'm saying is, like, just technical stuff and giving a fuck about what you're talking about.
Like, if you're going to do that bit, you know, like, oh, Nancy Pelosi threatened to use the 25th Amendment and she hired Matthew Perry's doctors, you know, like she's not telling him anything.
His opening monologue is hitting all of the hot-button culture war issues that you might hear about on any of these right-wing shows or all over social media.
And I kind of struggle to see what makes this perspective any different.
What I don't understand about it is because this is the thing that I've noticed with this concept of like right-wing comedy is like they just say the thing that was on Fox News, but then go, eh?
Like, that's it.
It's the same words with a different tone.
And people laugh because they're like, I remember hearing that from the Fox News guy, you know?
So I realized at a certain point that what was going on was that Jimmy was doing his opening monologue and then he was sort of playing some clips from TikTok and complaining about them.
And I kind of thought like, isn't this what his show is?
Episode one when this is just kind of the same thing as his show.
I don't know.
Anyway, the riff train is chugging along because they found a clip of a person who's a doctor on TikTok saying that it's not necessarily bad if you're overweight.
It's maybe not the most important thing for your health.
You can be healthy if you're overweight.
And guess what?
Not everybody has to be healthy.
It is not a moral failure of some kind if they're, you know, so anyway, they're all like, oh, live your fucking life.
They're very upset about this.
Sure.
And then I would say that the riff train goes a little bit off the tracks.
Isn't Jimmy supposed to be really empathetic to the financial concerns of working people?
Isn't he supposed to understand that economic pressures are serious right now and people are struggling to get through?
Like, why is he specifically allotting time on his show to mock someone who's just saying that it would be nice if parents shared the expenses when their children hung out together?
It's pretty implied that she's also saying that she would happily send this other parent $15 if her kid went over there and there were some kind of expenses.
This really doesn't make sense as something that needs to be mocked.
It's just some person on TikTok, so who cares?
But even if you decide to care, the thing she's suggesting isn't that crazy.
Maybe you believe that the host should always take on all expenses.
That's a fine position to take.
And I would have no problem with Jimmy arguing that.
If he's like, it's your house, you pay for whatever when the kids come over.
But it's such a weird angle for him to be like, how bad do you need $15 unless you're on crack?
So they really made a meal out of this seven-year-old Cuomo clip, which seems relevant.
But the larger issue I have is that Jimmy is so indignant there at the end about Cuomo mocking the poor from his yacht, but he just spent his own time on stage shitting on a random person on TikTok who suggested parents share the financial burdens of hosting play dates for their kids.
He's literally mocking the idea of not having $15 to spare as something that only makes sense if you're on crack.
He has no coherent position here.
It's all just bluster.
And sure, shooting on Cuomo is fun, and I have no interest in defending him, but Jimmy lacks a core here.
They also seem to be mocking Cuomo from 2017 about decisions he made in 2020, which I guess is why it's important to pretend that this video is current and that's why you're upset about it.
i think it just maybe made the rounds on right-wing social media i just what are those riffs man is it y'all Y'all supposed to be funny.
I think being on a screen on stage is my nightmare.
You know?
Like that combination of being trapped in a weird little room by yourself and the pressure of trying to make a large group of people laugh who you will then not receive the laughs from.
Yeah, but apparently Alex spent all his travel budget on going to California to pretend to cover Bohemian Grove, so he couldn't come to Chicago for the DMC.
Is the joke supposed to be that Alex is like, we're saying he's 10 million times more right than all of these other places because you're supposed to understand that he's not.
So I guess since Jimmy introduced Alex the way he did, he must really want his audience to view everything he says as accurate.
Alex is always proven right about everything and is a psychic, the most trustworthy source for information around.
In the context of this introduction, unless you take it as a joke, every question could basically be rephrased as: tell my gathered followers the secrets about this topic.
It's fun to pretend that Alex is some kind of a prophet, but you know, if you sign onto this premise, you're signing on to theocratic end times fascism, right?
I mean, like, you, this is what you're endorsing.
I mean, and yeah, the Secret Service wasn't on the same radios as the local police, it turns out.
It's a fuck-up that's been reported on where the local police offered radios for the Secret Service to pick up, but they failed to do so.
It's unclear if this is something that's happened before, but has never been an issue until now, or if it's a huge anomaly, but it's not the smoking gun that this whole thing was a setup, the way that Alex and Jimmy are presenting it as.
Like, I was reading an article about it, and I'm like, oh, yeah, that makes total sense.
It's like, you can't just let there be one audience radio band that everything is on.
So this is our just totally straight-faced interview segment, but we've been funny and derogatory towards all these people.
So we've got that context.
Now we've got Alex fucking Jones there, which to me is like there's only one way to combine those two, which is to say that we're going to make fun of Alex Jones.
So, like, the whole thing here is laundering Alex as a prophet and that he's right about stuff and taking him seriously.
Like, if you're one of Jimmy's fans and you hear Alex say the shooter was trained at a homeland security facility, you've already been told by Jimmy that this dude sees the future and he's always proven right about stuff.
So, this must be a big deal.
I bet you'd imagine some kind of documents that Alex has about the program where this guy was trained at a military installation or some kind of base.
He wouldn't just make this kind of claim about meaningless pieces of trivia, but that's exactly what he's doing.
Being trained at a homeland security facility is a claim that Alex can back up by showing that the shooter went to the Clarion Sportsman Club, that 2,000-plus member shooting range, which also has law enforcement agencies use it for shooting training from time to time.
This is the most inconsequential piece of evidence that's being used to make a very unsupported claim.
And Jimmy has more or less insisted that the audience should blindly accept Alex's version of the story.
Crooks's body, the shooter, was turned over to his family, as pretty much always the case with these sorts of things.
The police and FBI collected and processed the evidence they needed, and then 10 days later, he was released to the family so they could do what they needed to do for themselves.
This is all normal, but the whole thing that Alex and Jimmy are responding to is based on Representative Clay Higgins deciding he should go to Butler and poke around the site, play detective for himself.
When he found that the body was gone, he made a big stink about it, and idiots like Alex and Jimmy are turning it into proof of a cover-up.
This is nonsense.
So his body was cremated because the family decided to, because the FBI released the body to the family.
Well, I was told, well, Charlie Kirk told people that I know, like, the day it happened, there'd been a medical emergency.
And then weeks later, it came out that there was a medical emergency.
And then Biden was flown to Delaware for seven, eight days, wasn't seen.
And then now, you know, Pelosi's covered her butt and said, well, I saw the letter from Biden, the resignation.
It looked like it was from him.
Well, it didn't even have a presidential seal.
The signature wasn't thing.
So it looks to me, I'm going to speculate that they didn't get him the drugs normally on, or they flipped something, or we had a real medical emergency or he has medical problems.
And then they just basically held him until he agreed.
And then he showed up seven days later.
He kind of shuffled on to Air Force One in Delaware.
And they said, well, why don't you stand down?
Why are you giving up?
And he said, he didn't even agree to it.
And now he's on interviews and said he was basically forced out by the Democratic Party.
So we can talk about behind the evidence of killing the election all the time.
You can still debate that.
You can't debate that Kamala Harris got as many votes for primary as Toronto McDonald.
So Jimmy asking the question, like, hey, what do you hear inside secret info about this?
Like, the question presupposes that he's willing to believe that Alex has some of that information, which is already starting off on the wrong foot.
You shouldn't even trust Alex to accurately convey publicly available information, let alone mysterious behind-the-scenes gossip that he's probably just getting from social media.
So on July 5th, noted bigot and loser Laura Loomer posted on Twitter that Biden had a medical emergency on board Air Force One.
There's no evidence that this was the case, but it was exciting.
So people reposted it and it went around.
People denied Loomer's bullshit, but she shot back that it was all true because Biden was canceling events mysteriously.
The event that he canceled was a July 7th National Education Association staff union meeting, which he decided not to attend after the union announced it was going on strike.
It was solidarity and not crossing a picket line that canceled that event, not this medical emergency.
Biden still did other events in the same timeframe, but it doesn't matter.
The narrative stuck with the right-wing dipshit crowd, and they all kind of just ran with it.
There are some real problems with Alex's timeline that he's presenting here.
So this was on July 5th when this was supposed to have happened, which is easy to get conflated with July 17th, which is when Biden announced that he tested positive for COVID, which is also easy to get mixed up with July 21st, which is when he announced he was stepping aside in the 2024 race.
In order for Alex's premise to have any plausibility, they would need to have been drugging up and holding Biden hostage from the 5th to about the 21st, demanding that he step down or else.
Alex is playing a little bit of a sleight of hand here.
He's mixing up these details because what really happened is meaningless to him.
Jimmy is encouraging his free thinking-oriented audience to engage with reality the same way Alex does, which is pretty sad and not connected to anything.
No, they're pre- they're laying track in advance for bullshit, trivial Senate inquiries down the road if Harris wins in order to clog up the system and make sure that nothing gets done.
That's the kind of thing that these narratives serve.
I think that you could almost take a really, really cynical approach to Jimmy having Alex on the show.
Yeah.
I think that, you know, obviously when Alex has been on Rogan or when he's done Tucker Carlson, you know, you do see a huge boost in these kinds of numbers.
So you can see how Alex engages differently with different audiences.
I think he has enough instincts and not enough apple juice in him to know that if he started rambling about how the literal devil is trying to terraform the world so his demonic minions can breathe in a carbonless atmosphere and how Trump will save the world by burning more fossil fuels and polluting more, the audience is probably going to think he's an insane idiot.
So he moderates his image to become more acceptable.
And in doing so, he has to take on the mantle of a lesser of two evils guy.
This is the guy Jimmy wants to sell to the audience too.
So he doesn't mind Alex lying to the audience's face.
Or quite honestly, Jimmy probably has no idea what Alex actually believes.
More likely, Alex knows that the version of himself Jimmy wants to be there, he knows what that is, and he's being that because this shit's a game.
And sure, Trump didn't do a lot of that stuff, but you're a goddamn idiot if you're just sitting there trying to pretend Trump didn't do anything in his term.
He may not have done all the things that he did to keep the dumb-dums chanting and clapping on the campaign trail, but he definitely appointed three unacceptable Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade, along with countless other decisions they've made and will make that roll back all kinds of civil protections Jimmy's supposed to care so much about, most that play into the advantage of corporations, which Jimmy is supposed to be opposed to.
Jimmy is invested in making Trump out to be just another politician because that's an improvement in his image.
Treating Trump like a threat to all our public safety makes him a pretty much unsellable candidate, which sucks for him.
The whole brand is shitting on Democrats and pretending to attack them from the left, but with right-wing positions.
So the thing that the Democrats are fighting can't possibly be something that you actually need to fight to.
It has to just be an illusion, just another politician with big promises that doesn't do anything.
With Trump, from most of Jimmy's audience, that's a comforting thought.
With Harris and the Democrats, the audience fears that they would just be another normal politician.
They would say the right things and inspire hope that things could be better and then just be another establishment hack.
With Trump, the fear is that he's not.
The fear is that he means what he's saying and will try to assert dictatorial type powers.
By lombasting Trump as just another politician, Jimmy's actually doing amazing PR work for Trump among this kind of disaffected pretending to be left-wing audience.
Because it's like, okay, yeah, on this one side, we have the things that we want to hear and the disappointment of all those things not magically happening.
On this side, we have a normal politician would be like, ah, he's just talking shit about all the stuff that strips people of rights and is all scary.
And some of them are right-winger than they realize, probably.
But I also think that what is going on here, the essential dynamic that I find interesting is that you have the same, I think the motivations come from the same place as a lot of the media.
Sure.
You know, a lot of the media is invested in making a horse race out of the presidency and the election because you're selling a product.
As much as some of the race is fairly close, it will be closer in the eyes of the media because that is in their best interest for ratings, all kinds of things.
Seen this play out over and over again when Trump should be dealt with in a way that is much harsher.
The reality of what he does and how he behaves, the things he says are unacceptable within this realm.
And the fact that he is even treated as a viable person who people should be rallying behind is the bias.
This is the same thing, I think, with Jimmy.
Making Trump just another politician is a way to make it closer to a horse race between these two options.
It's that they're both bad in the same way as opposed to they're both viable alternatives to each other in the media because otherwise, what is the content you're going to make?
You know, you have to make there be some sort of tension.
And the only way to do that is to make Trump a viable option.
Yeah, you know, I think maybe, maybe we gave them too much of a pass in 2016 because it was like, for most of us, it was the first time we had experienced this level of Nazi washing.
I don't know what to tell you.
But I mean, for them to do it now, that's egregious shit.
Yeah, I think one thing that is amazing about Alex is that it is through having no respect for Alex and hating him that I have learned to have no respect for everybody else in the media too.
Yeah, I'm disappointed in his carte blanche support of Israel.
I'm never an anti-Israel guy.
I mean, I think it's just another corrupt government.
And I certainly don't support Hamas and Hezbollah in Iran.
I mean, it's all just, you know, terrible.
It's like, it says, ask me what port-a-potty I want to eat out of.
I don't want to eat your body.
I'm going to show 20 port-a-potties of which one do you want to choose.
I don't like any of them.
I can't use an analogy like that.
But Trump's slavish support of Netanyahu is dangerous.
And people say, well, wait, Alex is a big Israel supporter, but he also has criticized Israel.
No, I'm just not anti-Israel.
I'm saying I'm not anti-American.
I don't like the corrupt government with God.
I think Trump's better on Ukraine, but he has been slavish on this situation with the ongoing bombing of Gaza.
So, I mean, I've been against that from day one.
I mean, I said Israel could carpet bomb the whole place and maybe win, but they're going to separate victory because they're going to lose in public opinion.
So it makes sense why the audience might applaud Alex expressing disappointment with Trump's support of Israel, but it would be really helpful for Jimmy to ask a follow-up question here about why he's disappointed.
Alex doesn't care at all about the Palestinian people, which I would assume is a concern that a lot of the people who are applauding have.
Alex's problem is that it'll bring immigrants here who scare him.
Further, Alex realizes that the killing of civilians in Gaza looks really bad and people don't like it.
So the PR of Trump wanting more of it is not good for Trump.
These are the fundamental realities of Alex's position, which I think Jimmy's audience might be less quick to applaud, but I might have them wrong because I didn't think that a lot of this other stuff would be what his show is.
So I don't, I mean, if it's not a bit, Jimmy's coming off like a real dork, asking for inside info from Alex.
He appears to have personally bought in on an embarrassing level to Alex's shtick.
I think you're not going to be able to stammer your way through this one on a both sides, lesser of two evils kind of thing, because Trump supported and brought us the vaccine.
These people have seen such a profit motive in demonizing the vaccine and creating hysteria around it.
And people took that seriously.
People died because they believed the right-wing storylines about COVID.
And now Alex wants to pretend, well, Trump's pretty good on the issue.
It's not an issue.
It's a mass murder biological weapon plot.
I think that it's pretty likely that one of Trump's biggest liabilities is the anti-vax fervor that his base has rallied around.
It was so profitable and so easy to organize around that that they couldn't resist it.
But now it's also disqualifying for the candidate that they want to defend as the lesser of two evils.
This is the one that is amazing to me that they got that people get like twisted up on because to me, it just like I get the morality of being like, ah, foreign wars are bad.
You know, that's how it works and people should do that stuff.
But ostensibly, the idea of borders and nations is that sooner or later they'll be our enemy anyway.
So who fucking cares?
What matters for your government that you're choosing is that they don't poison you?
Like, isn't that the number one?
Like, hey, first off, government, don't poison me.
Not responding in an ideal way to foreign tensions and things that happen around the world that sometimes you have an influence in and sometimes you wish you had more of an influence in.
I think that because it was so profitable and because they were able to use it so well, a lot of people are true believers in a way that Trump cannot reach now.
And I think that's sort of the way that the knife cuts the other direction a little bit.
So do you fear that if Trump becomes president and he goes to secure the border, he's going to do it with what Whitney Webb talks about with surveillance and facial recognition.
It's going to be an electronic wall instead of an actual wall, which is just going to mean mass surveillance for everybody.
Yeah, I mean, Ron Paul always said when they build a wall, it's going to be keep us in.
But you already go to the airport.
It's not going to make you face scanned to get off an airplane.
So this stuff's already here.
So I'm not saying we should capitulate to it, but we have to cut the incentives off to tell the world they can just come here for free and going bankrupt.
We have corporations on cheap labor and you've got the different NGOs that are making the lion's share of the money off servicing all of these migrants.
That's a tough question for Alex because everything about his career should lead him to say yes, and it is too risky to ever allow someone like Trump to put something like that in place.
We assume good intentions.
Sure.
Oh, but everybody does right before everything goes wrong.
It shouldn't just be that, but like, hey, if you have your guy do a thing, it's also important to remember that four years later, a different guy might then have that same power to do that same thing.
And Alex's career is largely based on all kinds of absurd, well, if we allow this, then what, you know, kind of and for him to be like, they already face scan you at the airport.
Yeah, I mean, the opposite of what his entire world is based on.
Dave Smith tweeted out today that he thought it was a mistake for, well, here, he says, the problem with Trump calling the Democrats communists and Marxists, aside from being inaccurate and making him sound like a grandpa arguing in the 1940s, is the framing.
He says between his position on Israel, COVID, and even his praising of the secret service, what Trump calls his opponents Marxists, he positions himself as a defender of the establishment, guarding against the radicals.
That was never the appeal of Donald Trump.
People supported him because he represented a repudiation of the Bushes, the Clintons, the Obamas, and the corporate media.
He was a giant middle finger to the establishment.
I think it's very, very fair to say this is a more establishment Trump than we saw eight years ago or four years ago.
And I think that's his advisors telling him to be more of an establishment Republican.
And I don't think that's wise.
I think he should be the bomb thrower politically.
For the media quotes me on that, you know, the turn bomb thrower being he should be the outsider of the populace, the maverick, which he never, as you say, fully delivered on, but the system sees him as that.
And then now he is definitely, you know, I mean, he should be going after Kamala Harris and Biden for getting almost all the big corporate donations and all the big BlackRock money.
And instead, he is acting like they're Bernie Sanders, you know, and then some leftist at a university.
And that's not who they are.
I mean, they are military industrial complex puppets.
So the big appeal of Trump was being anti-war compared to them and going against the establishment.
That's still the big appeal that they've tried to put him in jail and take him off the ballot, kill him.
But that is being outweighed in many ways by what you're saying.
And I'm trying to be a big Trump supporter, but I'm not, you know, loyal opposition or whatever.
I just sit there and go kind of, you know, talk about him, but don't criticize him.
I mean, I really am concerned, and a lot of my listeners are concerned about Trump and the different turns he's made.
Like, I appreciate how everybody got into this place, you know, because for the longest time, we were like, what if everybody was just the worst possible candidate and then we'll choose, you know?
But then Biden stepped away.
So now you have to, the rules are different now.
Now it's not two dying old men, which one was going to be more of a monster to you.
Well, and the idea of creating all of these ways that you can sort of slow down the process and create bullshit inquiries in Congress and stuff like that.
I think it's so funny just that like we're in a space where it's like Trump could still win, but the only way he's going to win is with a massive amount of help from the media.
Well, that's the kind of thing that I'm dealing with is that I get everything except for when he says the, you know, what's not woke, wearing a pantsuit with his heels.
And then, I really do think that there is something that is fascinating about the way that Jimmy needs to make Trump just another politician in the same pursuit as the media, trying to make him another politician.
They make Trump a credible politician in order to facilitate the horse race, and Jimmy's making him just another politician for the same reason because it justifies this kind of both sides.
No, no, but when your alternative is yelling about the devil in front of a crowd of presumably hip Jimmy Door fans, but that's what I'm saying, they would enjoy that's a show, no, but they'd be laughing at him.