Today, Dan and Jordan stick around in the past to pay off the last episode's cliffhanger about Diane Sawyer's interview with Mel Gibson and Alex's inside information about what Mel said. Alex has some strong feelings, but the question of whether or not he even watched the interview hangs heavy.
Well, I had said that the lead-up to this game release was something I wasn't excited about, because it felt kind of like, eh, it's just another Breath of the Wild.
Because Alex was going to watch Mel Gibson on Diane Sawyer's show, and then he was going to reveal whether or not they cut out the cool things that Mel Gibson said.
I didn't see them on Twitter, but I heard from a number of people that very graphic photos and videos and stuff were circulating on social media, and these were the things that Alex was playing, and it was horrific.
So I watched this hour-long interview that Sawyer did with Mel Gibson, and it's about what you'd expect.
She's asking him questions about the movie, and then she has some religious experts on to discuss some of the reasons that people are concerned about the film.
The head of the ADL is interviewed, and he explicitly says that he doesn't think Gibson is anti-Semitic, nor is the film necessarily anti-Semitic, but it has the potential to inflame anti-Semitic feelings, particularly surrounding the idea that Jewish people, including those alive today, bear a responsibility for killing Jesus.
Gibson does also directly say that he believes there's a Uh-huh.
It helps provide some explanation for the reasons that some groups were offended by various aspects of the movie, while at the same time it doesn't hold Mel's feet to the fire about how his dad's a giant anti-Semite who hates the Catholic Church because they reject the idea that Jews are guilty of deicide, and how his new movie really gives the impression that Jews are guilty of deicide.
Sawyer really let that line of inquiry drop pretty easily, and I think that could have been pressed on a little bit more, because...
You know, just because your dad has a noxious belief doesn't mean that you do as well.
However, when your dad's horrible, noxious belief is tied to some religious belief, and you share that religious belief, it leads to the question of, do you also share that noxious belief that is connected to your dad's religious belief, which you do share?
Yeah, no, I mean, you look at that and you see somebody who's right on the cusp of a you-can't-handle-the-truth monologue where he reveals that he hates all the Jews.
You give him that rope!
You let him go!
Excuse me, I'm sorry, are you telling me to drop this?
Why do you want me to drop this, sir?
unidentified
Please continue on until eventually he's like, yes, the Jews killed Christ!
Yeah, I think she let it go a little bit too easily, but I guess, I mean, like, I got the sense from watching it that, like, he probably would have left.
Last night I went and worked on a film that I'm putting together and at about midnight I got home and my wife had taped Primetime with Diane Sawyer for me because Mel Gibson was on the show and I wanted to see what they tried to say about the passion and what his response was.
And my wife had just let the...
The tape runs, so I had two hours of shows on there.
And so I just hit rewind and sat down and started waiting for it to conclude its rewinding.
And I got impatient and hit play, and it stopped on Abraham Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League, which is really the defamation league of freedom.
And it stopped on Mr. Foxman and saying how scary the film was and how scary it was that these Christians were crying and everybody was so silent after he snuck into a screening of it.
And Mrs. CFR Diane Sawyer said to him, she said, well, is Mel Gibson anti-Semitic?
Is this film anti-Semitic?
And he said, no, it's not, but it's still dangerous.
The point that Foxman was making was that the film is super emotionally powerful.
It's just one long torture scene, basically, and it's very hard to sit through something like that and not have it make some kind of impact.
When there's a discussion of the movie being scary, it's because of the history of passion plays and how they've been used in the past to target Jewish populations.
One of the experts they talked to also made the point that there are aspects of how things are presented in the movie that will be experienced very differently by a viewer who has experienced Yeah.
You gotta understand where people are coming from, you know, a little bit.
If anything, it's way too easy on Mel, and too unwilling to make more direct statements, particularly about his dad.
I can't help but feel like the tone would have been a bit different had this been, like, after 2006, which is when Mel got caught drunk driving and yelled at the cop about how Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world.
And I talked to Hutton a few days ago before this aired, Mel Gibson's father, who's, again, just an expert on the New World Order.
We really respect his opinion on this.
And he said, well, I don't want you to talk about this on air until after it airs.
After it does, you know, you're welcome to.
They interviewed Mel for three and a half hours, and then ended up, I guess, about 12, 15 minutes, I didn't time it out, where Mel's actually talking on the screen.
And he did a great job.
I mean, most people, if they talk for three and a half hours, the news media's going to find something damning to use against them, but they were unable to do that in this interview.
But Hutton told me that Mel told him that he said, you know, when this comes out, I think I'm just going to go hide somewhere because of all the heat that's been on me, and I think I'm going to hide somewhere where nobody can find me.
I think I'm going to pitch a tent next to the weapons of mass destruction, wherever they are.
And, you know, I predicted on the show yesterday, without stealing Mel Gibson's lines, that that would never be in the piece.
He's still at the beginning of the show pretending that he had.
The other thing I'm thinking about, though, is that at this time, there was a really strong feeling that that would be a good bet to make, that they would cut that out.
Boy, I feel like at that time period it goes the opposite direction.
I feel like they were more willing to cut things out that made people look ugly back then than they are now.
Because now, think about all the times that they're like, oh, footage unearthed from blah blah blah with this person saying the N-word 300 times to their mom or whatever it is.
That's probably on every editor's tape.
For the past 30 years from some asshole, and they just delete it, and they're like, oh, well, we can't use it because then we won't have access to this guy anymore.
So, Alex, the part that he's clearly seen is this part that has Foxman, the head of the ADL, in it.
And so he's decided that the narrative is that Foxman is backing off.
He's made all kinds of rampant accusations and screamed about how Mel Gibson's an anti-Semite, and now he's backing off because he realized that his plot didn't work.
So, if I understand correctly, this documentary about how the film might be anti-Semitic is responded to by Alex in a way such as singling out the only Semitic person there and being strongly anti.
I made a good point in the piece, one of the pastors they were interviewing, that when Christians see a cross in major surveys, they feel love and compassion and Christ's sacrifice.
And that when they, quote, interview Jews and they see a cross, they feel threatened and that it's, you know, this bad symbol.
And that's ridiculous.
Also, Mrs. Council on Foreign Relations, member Diane Sawyer, Mrs. Anti-Gun, who's been caught, you know, putting out all these stilted and manipulated news pieces, she said, well, what about Hitler?
You know, he...
He said passion plays were very useful to, you know, show that Jews are bad.
Mel Gibson came back with the best answer.
He's so smart.
He said Hitler was an occultist.
Hitler was a devil worshiper.
You know, that's what I say to people who call into this show and like Hitler.
Alex is responding to a point that no one made, because his ability to respond to this piece at all relies on that.
Also, it's painfully obvious that Alex didn't watch the whole thing.
He thinks they cut out Mel's WMD zinger, and all the specific things he's mentioning are all from around the same five minutes in the middle I was going to say, that sounds exactly right.
The reason that some Jewish people expressed a negative feeling towards seeing a cross is because of that history of being accused of deicide and the atrocities that have been carried out against Jewish people using that accusation as justification.
Like, it's not something that is universal, but it's something that some Jewish people who were talked to and, you know, involved in responding.
But he can't even be bothered to watch an hour-long ABC interview before he spends a sizable chunk of his show complaining about it and using it to argue that the ADL is responsible for making anti-Semitism worse.
But there was an attempt to make yourself look a little bit less of a horrible, toxic figure in those times.
Because that was around when he was getting a bit more media attention.
There was more of a mainstreaming that came along with the tea party.
I don't know this to be true for sure, but the episodes in 2009 and that time period that I've listened to, that's where the impression, I think, of the decline comes from.
I think he might have shaved and was putting on a little bit more of a professional face around that point.
He's making these declarative statements about things that they cut out.
They cut out all the important stuff.
He doesn't know that.
And here's the thing.
It's not important whether or not anything Mel Gibson said was cut out or not.
The reality is immaterial.
There's a party line for Alex and his ilk, and it resonates with the emotional reality that the audience has.
It feels true that they cut out all the important stuff at the interview, and so that's what Alex is reporting to them.
It really is the definition of telling the audience what they want to hear, and Alex knows what the audience wants well enough that he doesn't even have to watch the show to tell you that the shit was cut out.
That's the narrative he was going to run with before his wife hit record on the VCR.
That was always going to be the thing.
And if they didn't cut stuff out, then his inside information from Hutton Gibson is meaningless.
She called me during the break and said, honey, I didn't take the entire primetime piece.
I guess a few minutes of it, VCR was...
They did leave the quote in about the weapons of mass destruction, which I couldn't imagine how they wouldn't, so I guess I was wrong when I predicted they wouldn't.
Out of three and a half hours of an interview, only 15 minutes of it or so, I mean, what an amazing quote that Mel Gibson was going to hide out.
In a tent next to the weapons of mass destruction.
So, apparently, his wife didn't record the whole thing.
And Alex didn't realize that somehow, which is weird.
I don't get it.
This is more suspicious.
Now, wouldn't she have told him that sometime before right now when he's on air?
How did he get impatient waiting for the tape to rewind if there was only like five minutes of the show recorded?
None of this makes sense.
I'd love to get to the bottom of this, but I suspect there's no hope.
My guess is that someone at the office, maybe even his wife, pointed out that he was completely wrong about the WMD joke, and now he has to try and cover his ass before callers confront him about it, which is what would happen.
So he just comes up with this baffling story about his wife's recording habits.
I'm glad you brought that up, because I think basically the reason he backed off is now, finally that the movie has come out, he better shut up, because he's going to lose even his milquetoast liberal Jewish supporters, because they'll see he's the full of it if he doesn't...
Conveniently forget what he said just a few months ago.
Anyway, Alex's entire angle on the story is that Abraham Foxman, the head of the ADL, is doing an about-face in this interview because Alex watched a couple of minutes where Foxman said that he doesn't think that Mel Gibson's anti-Semitic, which is a turnaround.
Alex believes that he's seen Foxman call Gibson and his movie anti-Semitic in the past, so this is a softening of his position.
In reality, Foxman hadn't said those things, but Alex constructed narratives where criticism of Gibson and the plans for this movie were reported as attacks on Gibson and accusations that he's anti-Semitic.
Alex has built a storyline out of his fantasies that does not really connect to reality.
Foxman and plenty of other religious experts were very concerned about how the plan that Gibson had for this movie would turn out.
Gibson's dad was no secret, nor was the fact that Mel himself was a member of the breakaway branch of Catholicism that denies the Vatican's legitimacy since the Second Amendment.
Right.
Foxman...
...
to read a script in advance, and they were super concerned that it seemed like the movie was setting out to make the Jewish people the primary antagonists in the film, with the Romans just Kind of being there and having their hands tied by Jewish influence.
Also, people were really not thrilled with the scene in the early version of the film where the high priest Caiaphas says, quote, His blood be on us and our children.
Which is a line from Matthew that's been used historically to hurl accusations of deicide on all people of Jewish ancestry to the present day.
And an associate of Gibson told the New York Times, quote, it didn't work in the focus screenings.
Maybe it was thought to be too hurtful or taken not in the way that it was intended.
It has been used terribly over the years.
It's kind of fun that Mel Gibson was so obsessed with pointing out that, you know, he's making the most accurate portrayal of the passion and yet he was swayed by focus screenings.
But he was very swayed by her visions of the passion.
One of the articles that I was reading points out that there's at least one example of something in the movie that is directly from those visions as opposed to being biblical.
This was about some comments that Mel had made towards the end of 2003.
Peter Boyle of The New Yorker went to a rough-cut screening of The Passion and then spent some time with Mel, and some of the stuff he was saying wasn't great.
For instance, Gibson was talking about that cutscene of Caiaphas and said, quote, I wanted it in.
My brother said I was wimping out if I didn't include it.
It happened.
It was said.
But man, if I included it in there, they'd be coming after me at my house.
They'd kill me.
Boyle makes it very clear in the article that the they Gibson is referring to are the people at the ADL and Simon Wiesenthal Center who had criticized him previously.
At another point, Gibson got mad that someone on CNN mentioned his father and said, quote, I don't want to be dissing my father.
He never denied the Holocaust.
He just said there were fewer than six million.
I don't want to have them dissing my father.
I mean, he's my father.
I don't know about you, but if my father made a practice of going around in the media and downplaying the Holocaust, I don't think I'd mind people dissing him.
So up till this point, before he'd said that this paints the portrait, Foxman had been pretty clear that he didn't think Gibson or the film was anti-Semitic, but that it was, quote, insensitive.
After that New Yorker piece, Foxman said that his comments painted the portrait of an anti-Semite, which isn't really the same, but, you know, there's no huge change, of course, for Foxman, but Alex needs there to be for some kind of a narrative to stick.
I started getting a sore throat last night when I was working on a new film, and then I got home and didn't sleep too well.
I'm sitting here on air running a fever right now.
With a raw throat, so just bear it with me if I'm not my normal chipper self.
I probably shouldn't even do a radio show if I'm sick because, again, I got home last night and my wife had taped Mel Gibson on the national show on ABC with Diane Sawyer, primetime.
and I guess we hadn't taped the whole thing.
And I'm like, yep, I knew it.
They didn't talk about weapons of mass destruction.
See, I knew she'd cut that out, and indeed it was in there.
A few years ago, there was a case in Idaho where a black football coach assaulted a white woman who was a reporter because she took his picture at the end of the game, and the woman's husband jumped over at the bleachers and ran up to the black man, and the black man called him a racial name.
This was in the newspaper, and we had him on the show, and the white man called him a racial name back, and he was arrested for the racial term, and the black man wasn't arrested for assaulting the woman.
And my point is, is that this is thought crime in America, and they're really trying to set this up.
So in the real world, this guy wasn't a coach that is involved.
He was actually a referee at a high school football game.
The woman in question was a reporter named Kimberly Ray, who was trying to take pictures of the referees specifically because she thought they had decided the outcome of the game, and one of the teams wasn't going to go to state because of it.
A lot of penalties were called throughout the game, and I decided I was going to include that perspective in my stories.
So, she felt that there were a lot of penalties in this high school football game and decided that her reporting was going to reflect that.
She tried to take pictures of the refs after the game was over while they were leaving to the locker room.
She was asked not to take their picture, and according to her, she stopped and was going to leave when one of them grabbed her camera and tried to wrestle it from her.
She yelled for her husband, who came to her defense.
The ref put up his hands and said, according to the husband, I ain't touched her.
This, like I said, is a story that's coming from her husband, Lonnie Ray.
So, at no point in his telling of it...
To ABC, did the referee call him any racist names?
However, he immediately stormed towards the locker room and found the county commissioner there, which should give you a sense of how small of a town we're talking about.
So Lonnie told ABC that he said to the county commissioner, you bring that N up here, I want to kick his fucking ass.
And thus, Lonnie Ray was looking at charges involving hate speech.
Mostly because he was using fighting words and making threats while using a racial slur, which could easily be argued implies some greater desire to commit violence against the person because of their race.
Lonnie didn't get convicted of the hate crime portion of the charges, but he did get charged with assault, and he ended up getting seven days in jail, which his lawyer appealed, and the conviction was eventually vacated.
This all happened in a town in Idaho with a population of around 7,000, and it happened three and a half years in the past at this point when Alex was on air.
Amazing that this is fresh in his mind as some kind of an oh-no thing.
He had recently at that point defended Aryan Nations founder Richard Butler and he would later go on to be the lawyer slash spokesperson for the white supremacist pop duo Prussian Blue.
I don't know if you know them, but they were like...
12 years old.
They were 12-year-old twins who would sing, like, white man, rise up.
He also published a book called, quote, Defensive Racism, an Unapologetic Examination of Racial Differences, which is something he clearly has very strong feelings about.
He really only took Lonnie's case because he thought it could be something that he could take to the Supreme Court to strike down hate speech laws all across the country.
I found Steele's book, and man, if I were trying to defend myself after I yelled a racist threat at somebody, I would definitely not want him as my lawyer.
It's wild.
It starts out by doing a little light teasing around the idea that maybe being a racist isn't so bad.
And it's just kind of a cute put your preconceptions aside.
He lays out a bizarre fantasy where Mexico and Mexican-Americans reclaim the Southwest and create Astlan, and black people, they claim the South as New Africa.
White people are going to be up north, but it's important to remember that, quote, Florida will be a special case due to its large population of Cuban and Caribbean extraction.
I assume that the white nationalist president of the United States will retire there to his second White House that will, I guess, eventually become a fort?
Canada will throw in their lot with this new America and, quote, thus the new America becomes pretty much a white homeland with its borders imposed upon it by others in the main.
Only the presence of Jews may be problematic and by far may prove to be the single most difficult task confronting new America.
The single most difficult task?
You've just broken up the country into hostile quadrants, and the most difficult thing for you is the idea that Jews might still be there.
But not before Alex posted an article in 2012 on Infowars that argued that Steele was set up and incarcerated thanks to the NDAA, I guess because he was too much of a political threat to Obama.
His wife was involved in trying to get him let out of prison because she was so into a lot of that other white supremacist shit and anti-Semitism stuff that he was all about.
That, like, she couldn't believe it was possible that he would hire someone to kill her, and it must have been the ADL trying to set him up.
So anyway, some more callers want to talk about the thing that Alex didn't watch.
unidentified
Diane tried to put a wedge in there, and Boyd Nell stood up to her.
When she mentioned something about Hutton saying, they were talking about Jews encamped in the Holocaust during the Second World War, and like 6,000 Jews, and Hutton seems to think, I'm not sure.
I just gathered from what was said last night that there were less than 6,000 Jews.
And Mel said, you know, 6,000, 2,000, 3,000.
It doesn't matter.
It was too many.
She started on it again, and he looked at her, right eye to eye, nose to nose, and he said, Diane, don't go there.
In other words, don't try to put a wedge between my father and me.
Previously, he had said, I love my father.
I respect him.
We get along well.
we're really tight and she tried to put that wedge in there and he just stood up to her and I thought wow go man go Well, I'm really frustrated now.
The first and most obvious one is that she thinks that there were 6,000 Jews killed in the Holocaust, which is indicative of someone who doesn't really know all that much about history.
The second thing that jumps right out at you is that this caller has no idea what Hutton Gibson actually is and what he actually believes.
Hutton has been on as a guest with Alex twice in the past month or so, and at no point has any of this element of his belief system come up because Alex is careful to present a curated version of his guests so the audience doesn't get scared off by their horrible ideas.
This caller thinks she's informed on Hutton because she's watched Alex's show, but in reality...
The third thing is that this caller believes that Diane Sawyer is trying to drive a wedge between Mel and his father by asking about how his dad is a Holocaust denier and whether or not he shares any of his dad's beliefs.
That is a fair question for Diane to ask, and it's not driving a wedge.
If anything, Hutton's Holocaust denial is what should be considered to be driving a wedge.
Mel has made a movie that is offensive to many people, specifically in terms of its depiction of Jewish people.
One of the things that critics have had a problem with is how the film plays into the tropes around DS.
Mel's dad is part of a traditionalist Catholic movement that is particularly mad about the Vatican condemning accusations of deicide against Jewish people.
Mel's dad is a Holocaust denier.
Given that set of premises, it's very relevant and fair to ask Mel if he's also a Holocaust denier, and if he doesn't want to answer that...
That's his business, but Diane Sawyer wouldn't be doing her job if she just left that totally alone.
This caller doesn't have a serious point, and she has no idea what she's talking about, but she feels very strongly about the subject, and that feeling is what matters more than reality.
And Alex does really nothing to help bring more information to the table.
If no one, if you knew nothing about the Holocaust and somebody like Diane Sawyer on television for ABC doing journalism is like, hey, the Holocaust happened, you'd be like, you did?
You know what would have been really helpful for Alex if he wants to play this game about the media lying about Hutton and his anti-Semitism?
Alex should have asked Hutton what he thinks about the Holocaust while he was on the show so he could see for himself.
Hutton doesn't make a secret of his beliefs.
He wrote a whole newsletter about them, and he's talked about that shit when reporters have asked.
Alex intentionally didn't ask about that stuff because if he did, he couldn't pretend the media was lying about Hutton's ideology because it would be coming straight from his mouth.
This is just a dumb fucking game that Alex is playing of just kind of hiding the point.
I think there was quite a bit of very pro-Christian media to the point now where I feel like if I went back and visited it, I might in my conscious brain now be like, oh, there's some anti-Semitic tropes that were just on TV!
And how freedom of speech worldwide is under attack, and listeners have been calling in one after another, saying how great they thought the crime time piece was last night with Mel Gibson, with the CFR member Diane Sawyer, and how Mel did a pretty good job of fending off her attempts at demonization.
And I mean, again, like his whole angle, start of the day, they portrayed Mel Gibson wrong and they cut out all the stuff and they did all this thing to make him look bad.
Everyone's response on the phones is like, I thought he did a great job.
He thought it was a pretty good piece, and so did I. What else can they do?
I mean, it's a good movie.
It's a wholesome film.
Why, then, has the media been demonizing The Passion of Christ?
And this is just a microcosm example of how, across the board, Anything that's wholesome and good is being attacked, while things that are evil are being held up as good.
But, I mean, basically, that's all I can say on the subject.
So there's another thing that happens a little bit on this episode, which is on our last 2004 episode, Alex talked to a gun-grabbing preacher, a Presbyterian preacher, who he tricked into coming on the show.
I was thinking about that time that Jesus saw that dude on the road, and he was blind or whatever, and Jesus was like, I'm going to put some mud in those eyes, and then you're going to be able to see, right?
Well, Lisa, I'm not trying to be mean to you, but I live this.
This is my life, okay?
And they came out a few years ago and said, everything's all right.
The government secretly passed laws reinstituting the Constitution.
And everything's okay now.
Meanwhile, they're passing Patriot Act 1 and 2, all this stuff's happening, and there's this rumor, there's this secret law that was passed, and everything's okay now, and I'm telling you, it's not true.
unidentified
Well, it says that there was four petitions in the world court submitted by the banking system with the Illuminati.
They're trying to stop this, Alex.
They're trying to stop this because it's going to make them go down.
In fact, he said, if you say anything about the law, or if they start the treason and punishment by death, this is what they're telling us to the U.S. Supreme Court.
It didn't sound like I'm going to convince you, so...
All right.
You know, everybody's running around going, the government's really good, and they secretly overthrew the New World Order in 2000, and the New World Order is covering this up.
Yeah, you know, here's what I was thinking, alright?
I was thinking, I had a thought when she said that.
This is what we're getting forwarded, right?
And I was reminded of the number of FWD colons back in the days that you used to get.
And then I was like, oh, well, with social media, at least I don't get those emails anymore because all those people do that shit on social media and that saves my inbox.
And then I went back and revisited that and I was like, no.
Yeah, it's like if you brought it up in a production meeting, like, hey guys, I didn't actually see this, then somebody would have given you some notes.