Today, Dan and Jordan reunite to check in on some recent Alex news. In this installment, Alex covers the NY subway shooting, gives snake venom Covid theories a thumbs-down, and chats with champion-level weirdo Ali Alexander. Citations
I got very enthusiastic about mustard based on a couple of good ones that I tried, and now the batting average is atrocious, and I cannot imagine doing a year of this shit.
Let me just give you a quick rundown of the incredible stories.
We have the corporate press in overdrive scrambling hysterically trying to hide the fact that the New York City subway shooter was targeting white people because he believed they needed to die and that he also wanted to kill black people that married outside of the African bloodline.
So, Alex isn't totally off base here, but there's a couple of important distinctions that need to be made between what Alex is saying and what information is known.
It is true that the alleged subway shooter Frank James had a history of posting disturbing, often hateful, and violent videos on YouTube.
He had a serious problem with New York's public health system, particularly the mental health system, having claimed that he was mistreated at a city facility.
He also did have some distaste for white people, but Alex is conveniently leaving out the racist shit he posted about many other groups, including black people.
However, there are these distinctions that are important.
This is a very possible motivation for his shooting, and it may well turn out that that's the case, but Alex doesn't know that when he's reporting this.
This is an assumption that Alex is making, and whether he was motivated by a racial hatred doesn't mean that he was trying to kill white people in the subway.
There is a distinction there that is, there's a meaning to it, although it's maybe slightly academic.
The second point is probably more important, and that's how you can see that when there's a black shooter who appears to be motivated by a hateful ideology, they're making decisions, and they are actual criminals.
Compare this to the way that Alex covers countless white mass shooters, like Dylan Roof or James Holmes, and you see a clear distinction.
When the shooter is white, there's a grand conspiracy about how he was brainwashed and basically just a blunt instrument being used by the globalists, while if the shooter is not white, it may be some kind of a conspiracy still, and they may be...
The third point I would bring up is that Alex is just making up an idea that the media is covering up Frank James' previous social media releases.
On this very day of this episode, April 13th, there was an article in the New York Times titled, quote, Suspect drifted from city to city as his videos hinted at violence.
This Times article offers a more nuanced perspective on James' videos and how he wasn't just someone who hated white people.
That variable is the only thing that's important to Alex, so that's how Infowars reports it compared to this from the Times.
Quote, He seems to have been more focused on his YouTube account, where the videos he posted frequently devolved into outbursts of homophobia, misogyny, and offensive comments about black people, Hispanic people, and white people.
Mr. James, who is black, directed much of his hatred towards black people, who he often blamed for the way...
Sure.
goes on to say, quote, he expressed admiration for black trailblazers like Martin Luther King Jr. and President Barack Obama, but unleashed vitriol on other black people, including Duante Wright, who was killed by a police officer in Minnesota last year, and other young black men shot by the police.
He blamed them for their own deaths, saying, you play stupid games, you win a stupid prize, and adding that they deserve to be shot.
There's a big article about the videos and his social media posts in Rolling Stone, and it's a story that was covered in countless other outlets.
The point here is that there absolutely was no desperate cover-up of this subject matter, and it's important to understand what Alex means when he says that.
When Alex alleges a cover-up, what he's saying is that other outlets don't have the same angle on the story that he does, and anyone whose narrative is different than Alex is covering something up.
So when Alex says that there was a shooting that was entirely and centrally around a hatred of white people, if you're a listener and you encounter another outlet discussing the broader hatred and anger James is trafficking in, you'll be far more likely to see that as the media trying to blur the real truth of the story, which Alex is reporting accurately.
This is just another critical aspect of Alex's early game.
When there are stories breaking and there aren't a lot of concrete details known about the situation, he'll pretty much always accuse an unspecific group like the MSM, the media, of engaging in a cover-up.
It never actually has to be true, because the effect he's looking for is to make the audience distrustful of any story that doesn't match his narrative, and warning of some imaginary cover-up does that perfectly well.
It doesn't have to have any bearing on reality.
Also, there's just a trope among racists that black crime is being covered up while white crime is overreported, and Alex is definitely playing that game here, too.
We don't blame someone for the color of their skin, for what somebody else with the same skin has done.
But the media does when it's Dylann Roof, also completely mentally ill, also mumbling incoherently and saying similar things.
But from a white perspective, when he went into an innocent black church and killed nine people at point-blank range and injured others, every white person in America was guilty and every gun owner was guilty, the corporate media told us, for months and beat us over the head with it.
We don't blame white people for what that deranged, mentally ill person did.
The answer is arming churchgoers, having armed deacons, and that's been stopping these shooters dead in their tracks.
It's really funny for Alex to pretend that he had an evolved response to the Dylann Roof shooting.
His immediate response was that if Roof wanted to actually kill black people, he should have become an abortion doctor, which weirdly he isn't saying about Frank James, which I find very strange.
Why wouldn't he say if he wanted to kill white people, he should have become an abortion doctor?
He's a little glib when the victims are racially targeted because they're black.
InfoWars own reporting from 2015 actually undercuts...
There was no mass blaming of white people for Roof's actions.
There was a deep trauma that had been caused by a person who acted specifically out of racist hate, and a conversation was needed about how that hate is more prevalent than most people want to admit, and this is where it leads a lot of the time.
When I say that Infowars' own reporting contradicts Alex, what I mean is that just after the shooting, Alex sent Jakari Jackson down to Charleston, expecting to find chaos in people fighting.
Alex was spouting his normal race war fears, but when Jakari got there, he found a community coming together to heal.
People of all ages, races, and backgrounds were embracing and supporting each other.
Here is a clip from his reporting.
unidentified
Walked out now, it's about 11:40.
They also had loudspeakers for the people who couldn't get inside.
They were out here listening.
And whether you were inside or outside, it was pretty hot.
I don't know if the AC was broken or if they didn't have one, but a lot of people had fans and water.
But it's still good.
You know, we were in there sweating, but everybody was enjoying the service.
It was, I guess, a brief message that the preacher brought, but it was a lot of praise and worship.
You know, it's a really good vibe.
You know, I keep saying about this, people of all, you know, races, colors, ages, all that.
You would not be surprised to learn that Jakari didn't do too much more reporting from Charleston, because a community coming together to reject racism and show that they're stronger than the hate that motivated Dylann Roof, that's not a story that's very interesting for Infowars.
When that's something you're sincerely suggesting, you need to stop a minute and consider that the problem may be way more serious than your acting.
Like it is.
It's bad enough that rhetoric around arming teachers has become so normalized, but the idea that religion...
It just feels like Alex wants to live in a world that's basically just that LP video for Deep Space Nine Millimeter, where everybody's just casually pointing guns at each other.
The most high-profile case I think Alex could be referring to here is the Sutherland Springs church shooting back in 2017, but that wasn't stopped by an armed deacon or somebody in the congregation being armed.
Stephen Williford was the guy who shot the shooter there, and he was at home when the shooting started, and he only responded after his daughter told him that she'd heard gunshots and he came to the church.
He wasn't an armed preacher.
In 2021, an armed man took over a church pulpit in Nashville, and the pastor in that case was able to decide.
In that case, I would suspect that if the gunman had been confronted by someone with another gun, you would end up putting a ton of churchgoers in a much more dangerous position where there could end up being exchange of fire.
People could be shot accidentally.
You, as the preacher, might accidentally shoot one of your churchgoers in your congregation.
It's nonsense.
It's not a solution to the problem, but it's Alex's solution.
It would be very hard for a pastor or a priest of the like who believes what they believe sincerely to want to kill somebody as opposed to lay down their own life.
That may be an idealized situation, but yeah, I hear what you're saying.
I think there's something to that.
I read some story, too, like I was looking for instances of this.
And there was a case of a pastor, I can't remember where, but he gave a sermon and then he went to a Walmart and there was a shooter and he ended up having a gun and shooting the shooter.
So it was a pastor shooting a guy with a gun, but it wasn't at the church, so I didn't think it was super relevant to this.
But his take on it was that it was a deeply traumatic experience and he hated doing it.
And that's what is important about what Alex is doing towards this subway shooter is he does not give a shit about the victims or about solutions or about trying to avoid it.
This is entirely in service of saying this is happening so that's why it's okay for Dylann Roof or why we shouldn't feel bad about Dylann Roof.
This is all in service of making it okay for white people to do or at least to excuse it.
You might be bringing a lot of baggage to this conversation.
So the New York Post story that Alex is citing doesn't say that the shooter didn't know where he was.
The witness just said, quote, I looked at him and I thought to myself he was talking to himself for like a while.
So I looked at him and I was like, this guy must be on drugs.
That's what Alex is extrapolating out until he didn't know where he was.
Also, Dylan Roof didn't say a bunch of gibberish during his killing spree.
He showed up to a Bible study and was welcomed in by the churchgoers.
He sat there with them for almost an hour before gunning down nine people in cold blood while they prayed.
I know that Alex is trying to grasp at straws to make this story somehow about himself, but this is some shameful shit.
You can tell, though, he's mad, and I think I know why.
In the aftermath of the Charleston shooting, people didn't blame all white people in the same way that in the aftermath of the subway shooting, people aren't blaming all black people.
However, Alex is a flagrant racist, so he experienced the conversations after Charleston as an attack on white people, and himself in particular.
He only felt that way because that's how he experiences reality, and then he went out looking for tweets and blog posts that would back up his persecution fantasies.
You know, some stray tweet of someone blaming white people.
In this current situation, things are a little bit different.
Because Alex isn't experiencing the coverage of this shooting as an attack on himself and his own identity, he's not looking for a defense of that narrative in the same way.
As was the case with the Charleston shooting, people aren't using the shooting to condemn an entire race, so this becomes a situation where there's a media cover-up.
And what's the media allegedly covering up?
Alex's narrative that this shooting was an attack on all white people, and thus we've come full circle.
And every event in the news is understood only through the filter of how it's proof of how Alex's particular identity is under attack specifically.
The obsession with talking about this only through the prism of Dylann Roof and that shooting is pretty telling, I think.
To me, that he believes that white people are at fault for things, have something coming to them, and is reacting so negatively because he wants to try and avoid that outcome.
We have to sell $60 million worth of product on average to be able to then get money to fund ourselves.
To break even, we've got to sell $60 million worth of product.
And some years we have it.
But I did things like take some of the money we raised in the years and invest it in real estate to be able to then sell that real estate when I knew I'd need it down the road to dump it back in the operation.
And I've already done that.
So I'm down to my last chips here.
But not because we're not popular.
Imagine this.
We're operating on something $27 million a year.
We're operating on $27 million a year with our own servers, own satellites, own crew, own legal, with all the attacks.
Our own infrastructure.
And CNN Plus launched with $400 million and has less than 10,000 viewers a week.
You can start a cooking show yourself on YouTube, and if it's half decent, within a week you'll have 10,000 views guaranteed.
Yeah, I mean, I think it's a little bit like the comedy, the pre-internet, you know, of like, there are so many gatekeepers before the internet that there is no way to break in unless you started, unless you knew people, and that kind of kept things much more homogenized, and it kept people from experimenting in a lot of really interesting ways, and then all of a sudden the internet comes along and...
You could be a mediocre white dude comic and have a very good career, and then the internet hit and it's like, oh, there's a lot of mediocre white dude comics around.
InfoWars is doing the most important work it's ever done, and I'm always up here having to scrabble to get money just to stay on the air when we're having our most important work ever and become more authoritative and more influential in intellectual circles around the world.
Your investment in InfoWars is always paying off in Freedom and Liberty and Awakening, and it's paying off better day by day.
It's like a pregnancy that's eight and a half months in.
You're about to get the baby.
It's about to be healthy.
All the work's coming in now.
We're in the birth pains.
But I can tell you, I have almost spent half the reserve money I have that was just like $4 million.
For a company this important, that was nothing.
I had $4 million five months ago, and I got $2.3 million right now.
So I guess half, almost.
And those are my underages.
And we need everybody we've got working here, and I'm not bitching or complaining, but why should we have layoffs when everything we said is coming true and we're winning?
I've got all the Democrat lawsuits coming to a head with the trials this summer.
I've got to pay for all that.
I've got judges doing all these fake sanctions on me massively that top law firms say they've never seen and they break the law, but if I don't pay them, they'll have me arrested.
I mean, we're under massive attack because we've entered the thick of the battle, the key gladiatorial event that's going to decide so much.
So now, your whole investment could really be damaged in Liberty if you let them take down this standard of freedom.
I need everybody seriously to get off the fence and go to InfowarStore.com.
2015 in June, he goes into an innocent black church of people he never met and didn't know who'd done nothing to him, and he shot more than 15 people, killing nine.
And they reported, the police said that he was gibbering incoherently and appeared to be schizophrenic.
That matter, they said all white people were to blame, and that all gun owners were to blame.
No, I'm not to blame.
And white people are not to blame.
This lunatic is to blame.
Just like the New York subway shooter Frank James, who shot more than 16 people, many in critical condition, is a black nationalist-like Waukesha parade killer, recently released video manifesto, posted video of the new Supreme Court justice saying he doesn't like her because she's married to a white person.
Another gibbering, Crazy.
Lunatic.
Do we blame black people?
No, we don't blame black people.
But who do we blame?
We blame the corporate media.
And we blame the establishment stirring up all this hate.
And we blame them covering up the fact that black-on-white crime is at least ten times white-on-black crime.
Because the media promotes that white people are bad and deserve to be mugged and attacked.
And many black leaders, even where I live in Texas, say, don't rob in your neighborhood, go rob white people.
Bigger issue, though, Alex has these crime statistics entirely wrong, like you're referencing, and it's literally just repeating inaccurate racist propaganda.
This conclusion that black on white crime is 10 times higher than white on black crime is reachable when you don't factor in population ratios and other factors into your analysis.
And this is a standard trick that white nationalists and white supremacist groups have used for decades.
We've talked about this racist myth a bit in the past and how telling it is that Alex thinks it's reality, so I'm not going to dive into that fully again, but this actually leads me to an important point.
Alex is trying to use some kind of illusion that all white people were blamed for the Charleston shooting in order to frame his coverage of the New York subway shooting.
Instead of blaming all black people, Alex has decided what he's going to do is blame the media for covering up that black on white crime is ten times higher than white on black crime in order to make black people feel like they should attack white people.
That's what he wants the media to be apparently doing.
This is literally what Dylann Roof wrote in his manifesto about why he decided to carry out the Charleston shooting.
This is from his manifesto that was published on his website The Last Rhodesian.
Quote, The event that truly awakened me was the Trayvon Martin case.
I kept hearing and seeing his name, and eventually I decided to look him up.
I read the Wikipedia article, and right away I was unable to understand what the big deal was.
It was obviously Zimmerman was in the right.
But more importantly, this prompted me to type in the words black-on-white crime into Google, and I have never been the same since that day.
The first website I came to was the Council of Conservative Citizens.
There were pages upon pages of these brutal black-on-white murders.
I was in disbelief.
At this moment I realized that something was very wrong.
How could the news be blowing up this Trayvon Martin case while hundreds of black-on-white murders got ignored?
Alex is using the image of Dylan Roof to somehow justify his racist response to the New York subway shooting, but the truth is that Alex is Dylan Roof.
Alex is disseminating the exact same false racist propaganda that inspired Dylan Roof to commit the mass murder of nine people praying in a church, specifically because they were black.
Alex is spreading the same information to his audience, potentially sending other impressionable listeners down a path that may not lead to murder, but definitely leads to overt racism.
And I find it difficult to believe that he doesn't know what he's doing.
He has had plenty of time to figure out that this is an incorrect racist myth and he either doesn't care or he knows that it is and he still perpetuates it.
I mean, when we did that episode on Anders Breivik, you see how similar a lot of Alex's rhetoric is to the things that were inspiring to him in his manifesto.
And this is true of other people who have been inspired by the great replacement conspiracy theories.
That certainly made an appearance in a number of manifestos, and Alex's coverage is identical.
But, I mean, it's the point, you know, you can't say stochastic terrorism enough whenever the point is to create an environment or a reality wherein it is justifiable to commit those acts of mass atrocities.
So regardless of whether or not Alex quote-unquote wants them to happen, by disseminating this bullshit, you are trying to make them happen.
Well, and you're increasing the likelihood that people will find places that have even more extreme versions of these racist talking points and myths online if they search these things out and they'll become deeper radicalized.
Well, to put it simply, his response to a mass shooting, of which there are just an unconscionable number, is to say things that will inspire another mass shooting.
Millions and millions spent going out and canvassing Michigan to find mainly young white men who came from fatherless homes who were looking for male role models and who were upset about the decline of America and wanted to train with firearms.
To be basically in the military without joining.
And they typecast.
They spent years setting them up.
They activated them and ordered them.
The FBI recorded this themselves.
It got into evidence.
Ordered them to attack Whitmer's house.
Ordered them to kidnap her.
Ordered them to cut her head off.
And they're on tape.
No, no, I don't want to.
But the FBI agents and informants muscle them and command them and order them to at least show up and run around at night in the bushes by her house.
So they could then say she was a victim when people wanted to impeach her during the lockdowns.
And the same FBI team that did that then ran January 6th.
And there are eight other people facing state charges that are yet to go to court.
The situation is not what Alex is describing, although there are problems.
And I think the issue, generally speaking, is that the FBI rushed this case.
They jumped too early for the arrest, as the plotting that was going on wasn't solid enough for them to likely get charges to stick.
As it stands now, it's too easy for the defense attorneys to portray what was going on as just some dudes talking shit.
And it also doesn't help that there were multiple moles in the group, since that does lend itself to the impression that the FBI was running the whole thing, but that's not borne out by the information that is available.
Yeah, you know, that's the FBI's own fault, though.
If they hadn't built a reputation for doing that, Adjacent behavior in the past, whether or not it's an all-the-time thing or anything like that, but you do it one time, it's there.
I don't have, like, necessarily a problem with some skepticism surrounding this, and I also don't think there's, like, an absence of criticism that is merited, but I don't think that the claims that Alex is making are defensible.
Well, the thing about it was, and you wouldn't have seen this coming, but the measurement was how successful you were at getting around COVID restrictions.
So Florida was the best at putting masks just a little bit below your nose.
But I think in this case, answering the second question, who did the study, it helps you get halfway to answering the first question.
This was a study done by the Committee to Unleash Prosperity, which is a non- If you are non-supervillain, you know there's really just one simple rule.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the committee's co-founders, Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore, are economists with deep connections.
To the Koch networks and our board members for various wings within the American Legislative Exchange Council, which is their way of putting policies around into state legislatures and what have you.
As you might expect, this is a study that is not primarily about mortality from COVID.
It's an economic institution with strong right-wing bends putting out a paper meant to justify the argument that places that kept businesses open are better.
To be clear, I think that New York and California and our beloved Illinois have a lot of valid criticisms that can come their way about handling COVID issues, but I'm not going to take a study from the Committee to Unleash Prosperity very seriously in terms of that argument, and Alex hasn't even read the article or the study.
Uh, I gotta assume that there's some kind of internal metrics, and Alex knows that, like, when he complains about Stelter for long periods of time, it does numbers.
I think a lot of people did a lot of that with Trump.
Sure.
I think sometimes his misspeakings might have been a little more funny.
And I honestly think that if Alex was covering this, like, recognizing that he just misspoke and thought it was funny that that's the word that he said, I don't think that would be anything even worth comment on.
No, it's just that Alex thinks that, like, conceptually, Biden's bringing prostitution here.
There's a little bit of a misconception about what the actual story is relating to the cameras in the subway not working.
According to officials who spoke to the New York Times, the issue was a faulty fiber optic cable that affected the station as well as two others nearby.
However, this was not the case for all of the cameras in the stations.
Tim Minton, the spokesperson for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said, quote, the suspect was able to be seen in movements evaluated with the MTA's assistance.
He added that the cameras with malfunctioning feeds were located at turnstiles, quote, where they would not be in a position to capture any activity on the platforms below.
A more skeptical mind might come to this sort of different possibility, which is that maybe a ton of the cameras in the New York subway system don't work, and they're just there.
and saying that the ones in this station happen to be off is a way of trying to cover your ass a little bit.
I don't know if there's any evidence pointing in that direction, but it seems like a more reasonable suspicion to have than what this caller is getting at.
I know that I've worked at more than one low-paying job where they had cameras that definitely didn't work.
And at least in one case, it only came out that the cameras weren't plugged in after someone needed footage to prove something.
It's not unheard of that companies do that kind of thing, but I think it's a stretch to assume that an entity Well...
The government has been overtaken by the wealthy and has transformed itself into what amounts to a kleptocracy that steals money that would be going towards, say, public-funded issues like transportation and the like, and whenever you find out that it needed to be there, that's when you discover that essentially they're running on a goddamn skeleton of what's been ripped away from them.
So, first of all, no one's necessarily accusing James of being a mastermind.
This was not the most intricately planned attack that has ever been seen.
It was pretty blunt.
Force, kind of.
More importantly, though, it's really critical to look at what Alex is saying here about race.
Alex's conjecture is that if Frank James had been white, the FBI wouldn't have killed that investigation into him and that they only did that because he's black.
So it doesn't fit the narrative that they want to push.
What's going on here is that Alex is taking a fake piece of information that James was actually on this FBI watch list and using that to make the story.
fit his narrative.
Alex is the one who's forcing things into a predetermined narrative and accepting bad information because it adheres to the conclusion that he already wants to be true.
Yeah.
unidentified
Which is somehow that this would have been different if he was white.
Yeah, but if you know that, why did you say that they were gonna just all not have any opposition because Russia had paid off everybody and there would be no fighting and it'd be over in 48 hours?
If you knew that special forces had been training for a decade or whatever.
So, there's a quick clarification that we need to make here.
When the war was just starting, Alex did say that Putin had walked into a trap, but it wasn't about losing a war or the Ukrainian forces repelling an invasion.
Alex was still saying that the Ukrainian military had been bought off and all that.
When Alex said that Putin had walked into a trap, he was saying that by invading, Putin made himself vulnerable to being blamed for a cyber attack false flag that Alex was sure that Klaus Schwab was going to pull, presumably on the West.
Alex was very specific about this, and now he's trying to rewrite shit about what the trap was.
That's why you got to really nail down the specifics of words, because when he says trap, he's talking about something in his head that you can bring into the conversation with something in your head, agree that they're both traps, and assume that Alex is talking about something correct.
So I want you and your listeners to know, as much hearsay as people are saying that lymphoma's not real, it's not affecting your T cells, I have proof that it is.
To be clear, there's plenty of reasons that aren't lymphoma why someone would have a high ratio of these cells.
For instance, you could have a viral infection.
That would cause this same test result.
Typically, this is a ratio that's discussed not in the context of lymphoma, but in terms of HIV-AIDS, which makes sense, because this woman did say that she was badgering this VA doctor to test her dad for HIV stuff.
Thinks he has this non-existent condition of AIDS.
Interestingly, you generally find decreased ratios of these cells in patients with HIV or AIDS, so this test essentially is invalidating her entire argument that she came in with, which is why she had to run to WebMD to find a new thing to focus on and claim that her dad got from the vaccine.
There's no good evidence anywhere that COVID vaccines cause lymphoma, but I think Alex might just be getting confused because the vaccine can cause lymphadenomyces.
Which sounds similar, but is actually just swelling of the lymph nodes.
Yeah, I mean, and just, you know, the education system failed, and just every part from start to finish that leads you here is not just, like, her choices.
I think you can be susceptible to a lot of dumb narratives.
Absolutely.
unidentified
I don't know if that's necessarily a failing of the education system, but it's a failing of at least the people who disseminate information like Alex and wherever she's pulling from to have some kind of a responsibility.
So this is about Stu Peter's conspiracy documentary called Watch the Water, which features a chiropractor named Brian Artis and apparently claims that COVID has to do with snake venom and the devil.
Here's a synopsis of the documentary from Stu Peter's page.
Quote, the plandemic continues, but its origins are still a nefarious mystery.
How did the world get sick?
How did COVID really spread?
And did the satanic elite tell the world about this bioweapon ahead of time?
Dr. Brian Artis has unveiled a shocking connection between this pandemic and the eternal battle of good and evil which began in the Garden of Eden.
And you can get it for a limited time sale price of $109.
Suffice it to say, this is overpriced.
Apparently, after the backlash of people making fun of the documentary claiming that the vaccine was meant to inject people with Satan's DNA, Artis decided that he should do some damage control, so now he's come out and say that he's been done dirty by Peter's documentary and it doesn't accurately capture his claims.
That said, a giant ad for the documentary is still on the top of Artis' homepage, which leads into a big ad for the Anti-V collection, so I guess he's not really that opposed to it.
So in this scenario, someone out there is milking enough venom to poison the world, which suggests that we won't have to worry about snake bites anymore.
And I will say that I'm a little bit optimistic, too, because in response to this call, Alex says, like, this is bullshit.
unidentified
A series of coincidences, remarkable coincidences, truly inspired by God, like, led him to this supposition, and then after that, he was able to kind of...
Methodically prove that coronavirus is actually snake venom, specifically the crite snake and the cobra snake.
So do you know how much snake venom you'd have to put in a water supply to have these type of blood clotting effects and things?
That a snake bite would do.
A snake bites you, it pumps in, say, a tenth of an ounce of venom into your half an ounce, and then it makes you have blood clots and your leg rots off and you die.
I'm not poo-pooing this one.
We'll get artists on it.
I know it's the big, big thing right now.
But to say that snake venom is being dumped in the water supply, it's diluted and it breaks down electrochemically very quickly.
What you want is a virus because it replicates in the body, so it spreads quickly.
Yeah, there's an element of critical thinking that he's engaging with this theory on, and I find it offensive that he's capable of it in some circumstances and not in others.
So, Alex, it's another caller, and boy, I think a lot of people...
You know, sometimes if you don't engage with Alex's material and you don't listen to his show, you don't recognize how goddamn religiously insane this show is.
The Lord put on my heart to call and give you an exhortation and just let you know, besides the end of the spear, you're a crusader, a modern-day crusader for these times.
Before the return of our Lord and Savior.
As you know, and you have spoke, we're in the days of Noah, or the days of Lot.
And many are just not awake, but you as a crusader are leading those as a type like Noah.
As they came up to the sea, they looked behind him, Pharaoh's army was there.
Today that's our evil.
And in front is a sea that is impenetrable.
He, as the word says, knew that God will make a way.
And he parted the sea, and he made it across.
You're leading people in that way, into the light, into the truth.
And that's going to lead to great and mighty things.
Yeah, I think there's something troubling about, like, when you understand what Alex is actually disseminating as information, when you have to interpret it and experience it as, like, you're fucking Moses, man.
Listen to the way this man is speaking and what he's saying about Alex, and then just go back in time and think...
Maybe Moses was just an asshole who said he did all this shit and convinced enough people to believe it and then everybody forgot that he was full of shit.
I was previous to this, a deeply embedded right-wing political activist who was coordinating with Paul Gosar and all these other weirdos, and I was involved in campaigns and stuff like that.
I was an apparatchik, Alex might say.
But no, I'm into philosophy now because shit got too hot.
So the first clip, maybe not so much philosophical, but it has to do with reports that his Periscope channel, like the videos aren't available anymore.
A news article saying that Ali's videos have since been deleted doesn't necessarily imply that he did the deleting.
I get that he's sensitive, but this is a little sad.
Also, Alex's situation is entirely different.
The reason he's in trouble here is because when he was sued, there was an order for the preservation of materials related to the lawsuit.
This was prior to his YouTube channel coming down, and in the intermediate period, no one took any action to preserve the videos that were on the channel that were relevant to the case, and so they cannot be found now.
No one is mad at him for deleting videos.
The issue is that he failed in his duty to preserve evidence.
I've not told any reporter this, and only my lawyers and I are aware of this, but the January 6th committee is going to try to outlaw Bitcoin.
Okay?
I mean, this sounds kind of crazy, but this is where this is leading.
And I knew this in December, okay?
But I want to break it here on Infowars.
So what you're going to see the committee do, they're going to say, well, Donald Trump did this.
Roger Stone did this.
Rudy did this.
Ali did this.
Alex did this.
Here's criminal referrals.
Here's things we're not going to criminally refer, but we'd really like, wink, wink, nudge, nudge, the Justice Department, to move on.
And here are ten policy recommendations to keep the right wing from ever organizing again.
You're going to see recommendations in there that try to outlaw Telegram, try to outlaw or censor Bitcoin, increase the regulatory environment for Bitcoin so that it's harder for more Americans to get in while the rest of the world competes with us on this sovereign currency.
So this is Ali playing a preemptive defense game because I suspect that he has a pretty good idea that there were some shady fucking transactions involving groups that were involved in January 6th that were done by Bitcoin.
And the Telegram is a platform that a lot of them use to plan and incite people.
This is an attempt to hijack that conversation before it even happens because the ultimate end of it is threatening to some aspects of Ali's brand.
I wouldn't be too surprised, though, if there were conversations in the not-too-distant future about more regulation and oversight of Bitcoin, but I don't know how much of that's going to involve the Jan 6 Committee.
Seems like that's just long overdue, and there'll be some kind of a financial nightmare that comes along, probably to do with NFTs.
I'm really happy to be in studio today, and I'm happy to be with you.
One, because it's good to be next to somebody who's going through some of the same hell that we are.
But I think I've done this whole 15 months wrong.
A lot of it's been, woe is me, why isn't the conservative movement doing this or that?
And then I've been watching the series, The Chosen, which has been really good, and I've been getting some counseling from some Christian friends, and they're just like, you've got to smile through this more, Ali.
And so, you know, I think that that's my task.
That's kind of my cross to bury right now.
But everybody, everybody, if you're listening to this...
You are a part of this, and you can play a role in this.
You need to red-pill your neighbor.
You need to make prophetic statements about the J6 committee and what they're going to do to you and your neighbors so that when that time comes around, your neighbor says, wow, that person's right.
These fringe figures will have more of an influence, whereas if they have a small victory, then Kevin McCarthy will stay being able to whip people into place to get things accomplished.
Whereas...
I don't think that makes much sense, because if they have a small victory, then the conservative people like Marjorie...
If Kevin McCarthy gets too large a red wave, the conservatives are in control.
If Kevin McCarthy just gets a little off the tip top, then he's in control.
And then we're just going to have horrible legislation.
They're not going to go on offense.
We're not going to have a committee that investigates the summer riots.
We're not going to have a reverse J6 committee to investigate the insurrection that happened on November 3rd and the FBI setup that happened on January 6th.
We're not going to have any of that.
So what they're trying to do, and this is what Mitt Romney and Liz Cheney are doing, I mean, this is the coup, part three.
Well, I mean, I think that some of these priorities that Ali has are just never going to happen anyway.
Right, right, right, right.
For sure.
Whether you had a giant majority in the house or not.
But I think that the possibility of having some trivial-ass going-nowhere committee or something like that, Marjorie Taylor Greene wants to start, I think the likelihood of that is much higher if there's a small victory, because she could use whatever leverage she has in terms of passing something that is a priority for Kevin McCarthy into, like, you have to put me on this thing, and I will go along with your caucus.
And so what happens is, let's say I get 20 plea deals.
Well, then this next person takes the plea deal.
And then they get a harsher sentence because they didn't, or they get taken to a jury trial or bench trial, and then they get convicted, and then, well, they get a harsher sentence because they have to have a harsher sentence than the plea deal.
And so what happens is, when the exonerating information comes out here, and then all these people who got a plea deal say, well, actually, we want to revisit it, the judges say, no, we're going to quash that motion.
Also, if Ali is telling the truth and January 6th defense lawyers are leaking privileged information to him that he's then discussing on Infowars, that is a gigantic confidentiality problem and there could be some real consequences for that.
These lawyers might be risking disbarment, which honestly wouldn't be too surprising considering that Ali's last lawyer, Jonathan Mosley, was just disbarred for breaking six rules of professional conduct.
If you wear camouflage to a rally from now on, you get what's called an FBI threat tag.
Okay?
That hasn't always been the case.
Think about this.
We survived the Tea Party.
We survived the Gifford shooting.
We survived all of those controversies.
Where still you could wear militia gear and not automatically get tagged.
Now, because of January 6th and what they did to our beautiful, peaceful protest, if you wear camouflage at any protest across this country and the FBI can identify you, you get what's called an FBI threat tag associated with you.
Well, you know, in that I want to answer the question you just asked.
What happened January 6th?
I don't know.
And I'm actually convinced that some of the conspiracy ends and then Satan's domain starts.
Because you follow this stuff way more than I have, and you've done it for over 25 years, and I have a great understanding of campaigns, large organizations, and government, but I don't see something like this fully cooperating with each other without a supernatural force influencing everything.
So, Ali, there's one last clip here, and Ali has an interesting take on how people like you and me, I would guess, if he was to talk to us, he would look at us as, like, cavemen.
We're backwards-thinking folks, whereas people like him, who want a religiously ordered society, basically a theocracy, they're the real innovators.
They're the real forward-thinking people who have, like, a...
And that's what Jesus did in contrast to the Pharisees and the Sadducees.
He said, there's a different way to abide by the law.
And by the way, now it's universal.
And so we need to have a different way of saying, we believe in these archetypes and we believe in these traditions, and you don't need to pay attention to the Republican label or the conservative label anymore.
These work for humanity.
They've led to a population of 7 billion people, and we should applaud that.
And it's really outrageous, some of the stuff that he ends up...
First of all, some of it's just dumb.
And then some of it is stuff like, January 6th had to be the devil's doing because how do you coordinate all these people without a supernatural force?
I mean, you know, it is kind of an example of something that always exists in this type of a movement, which is just a person who's willing to say anything.