#910: March 18, 2024 dissects Alex Jones’ baseless claims—misrepresenting Trump’s "bloodbath" remark as economic warning while ignoring broader context, falsely framing Absolute Zero as a genocidal globalist plot, and twisting racial warmth study data to push anti-white conspiracy theories. His Advil commercial distortion reveals selective outrage, while Putin’s election clip gets inverted into praise despite actual criticism. The episode exposes Jones’ pattern of cherry-picking narratives, ignoring facts, and stoking division under the guise of exposing "globalist brainwashing," proving his rhetoric thrives on confusion rather than truth. [Automatically generated summary]
You know, when I stop to think about the disappointment, you know, okay, so in 04, there's a certain amount of excitement to the computer chip being the mark of the beast and everything, you know, because if it works, that's a huge technological advancement, right?
So first, I misheard Alex and thought he said he was going to start a hating show and take requests to do hatings on air and wasn't sure how that was going to be different from his I'm a policy wonk!
Yeah, or would that, now that I think about it, would that be like War of the Worlds shit for these people where they'd be like, oh shit, it's happening now!
I don't, I think that you could, like, the only problem is Alex's voice and audio quality would probably tip you off that this, unless you were like...
Yeah, so Farid Zakaria did a piece on CNN about how sanctions don't work and aren't effective against Putin.
The title of it was, quote, In the video, he's mostly talking about how the U.S. needs to send more weapons and support, but towards the end of it, he does touch on Macron's comments involving sending troops.
Zakaria says that it would be better than just allowing Putin's aggression to go unchecked, which is not a widely held position.
But here you have a CNN commentator saying the thing that Alex is trying to pretend everyone is saying.
So this person magically gets turned into the official mouthpiece of the globalists.
Alex does this a lot.
There have been many temporary official mouthpieces of the globalists.
Whenever the thing someone is saying needs a little extra authority tacked onto it, we need to make this more important.
Quote, China now is building a couple of massive plants where they're going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think that they're going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border.
Let me tell you something, China.
If you're listening, President Xi, and you and I are friends, but he understands the way I deal.
Those big monster car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, and you think you're going to get that, you're going to not hire Americans, and you're going to sell the cars to us?
No.
We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you're not going to be able to sell those cars.
If I get elected, now if I don't get elected, it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole, that's just going to be the least of it.
It's going to be a bloodbath for the country.
That'll be the least of it.
But they're not going to sell those cars.
If you want to hear that the Chinese cars being sold cheaply from Mexico is being the least of the concerns that the country will be dealing with and the bloodbath that'll occur if Trump isn't elected, that's a fair reading of what he's saying.
If you think that when he says it's going to be a bloodbath for the country, if you hear that and you think when he says country he means the U.S. auto industry, that's a defensible reading based on the context as well.
And if you're concerned about Trump's intentions, you don't need this comment to illustrate the darkness of his plans.
But a lot of the media have latched onto this, and it's become a big deal with folks like Alex insisting it shows how deceitful the media is.
This is one of the keys to Trump's rhetoric and how this works, which is that he speaks like a fucking idiot, and his words become a Rorschach test that allow a bunch of different interpretations, and when you have your interpretation, you get to accuse everyone else of lying about context if they disagree.
An easy way to avoid this is if he didn't talk so much shit.
If you cut that shit out, we wouldn't have to deal with this.
So honestly, I think the Washington Post's headline about this speech that Trump gave is a little more important, and that is, quote, Trump says some undocumented immigrants are not people.
So in that same speech, talking about immigrants who have been accused of crimes, Trump said, quote, I don't know if you call them people.
In some cases, they're not people, in my opinion.
But I'm not allowed to say that because the radical left says that's a terrible thing to say.
So I think maybe that's a little bit more important.
I mean, this one's so tough because it's like, is part of the attraction of Trump, and maybe let's put it in a better way, right?
Isn't part of the attraction of Trump is that the media gets to print all these horrible, like, oh, Trump says everyone's gonna die if people don't like Trump, you know?
But they don't print, like, Trump says if you make bathtub gin upside down, you become the king, you know?
Like, he says absolute utter nonsense all the time.
Like, can you imagine if we just completely framed away his violent rhetoric and all that people were left with was just the absurd thing.
How do you paint a story of overthrowing the Capitol on the guy who's like, I don't know, but I stole a bunch of money from the Cubans when I was nine.
So there's a lot of defensible positions in terms of how you interpret that bloodbath comment.
But interestingly, what Alex is doing is not one of them.
There's no reading of Trump's words that justifies the interpretation that Trump was warning Xi that if he put those tariffs onto Chinese cars coming in from Mexico, that would be a bloodbath.
This highlights something that I think is important to understand.
Alex is making an argument that the media is taking Trump out of context, and doing so for malicious purposes.
I'm not totally convinced that is the case, but let's stipulate that that's correct.
Even if it is the case that the media is misrepresenting this comment, Alex is doing so even more egregiously.
Alex is tacking on a whole storyline to make the comments less inappropriate, and I suspect a part of that is rooted in the fact that Alex totally thinks that there will be a bloodbath if Trump loses, and he's pretty defensive about it, and is preparing to call anything that might happen a false flag.
So, I think that part of the game is a little bit...
If you stop, because I understand all the arguments people are making, but if you just stop for a second and pull back and then go, maybe the problem isn't that we're interpreting Bloodbath correctly or incorrectly.
The problem is that...
You could interpret bloodbath as a literal bloodbath, and that would be totally reasonable to assume, because he's already done the thing, you know?
Right, you know, and I think that there are a number of things in life they say that, you know, when you cheat on a spouse or something like that, that's not a decision that you made, it's ten decisions back that led you down this road that got you to there.
We are ten decisions deep into the issue where it's like, if we have a presidential candidate, former president, who tried to overthrow the government, who is running again, who you can interpret him saying, there's going to be a bloodbath if I don't win.
Also, Trump is having big trouble raising money because he's getting on average $50 donations.
And all the big globalist billionaires, except for a few people that aren't globalists that are billionaires, are piling on to destroy what they see as a champion of the people.
You can say what you want about Trump, but...
The globalists hate his guts because he actually tried to be president and tried to do things he thought was good for the country.
He certainly made mistakes, but he's a good man.
He's a strong man.
And those that have supported him at a high level like myself have been persecuted dearly for it.
And contrary to me cutting and running, I support Trump more than ever because of the persecution.
Call it pig-headedness if you like.
But at the same time, that does not mean that I'm in a cult and that I slavishly...
Defend every policy he's involved in are the things that he does.
He has been making a lot of moves lately endorsing neocon globalists that hate his guts.
And I know the Inside Baseball, who the advisors are that are telling him this.
And so I really see our mission here as trying to get Trump back into office but being very aggressive when he does things that I think and that my expert guests think and that the listeners think.
It's wrong.
I think we really have a consensus here on air dealing with that, but I just wanted to stake that out and be very, very clear because there's some cultic Q-like adoration for Trump that he's a god, he's perfect, he can't make any mistakes, everything's 3D chess, and that is not what's going on here.
Because if Alex really did believe that the vaccine was a biological weapon that was meant to kill people, it does not matter if you intentionally did Operation Warp Speed or if people tricked you into it.
And if you're Elon Musk and your whole thing has been, I love the Wild Wild West open of the internet, and in reality what you're doing is shadow banning Alex, that means everything is probably a lie.
Also, I called it a turning point last night, and I want to go back over it more this evening.
Letitia James planned to persecute New York firefighters for their speech backfires because they have a right when she comes to their union, their event, to boo her and to chant Trump.
Well, she wanted them fired, she wanted their pay cut, she wanted them persecuted.
Isn't that an indictment of what a pig-like creature she is, that Soros witch who, I guess, metaphorically flew into the meeting on a broomstick?
He later says that Fonny Willis also flew in somewhere on a broomstick, which is...
Probably a coincidence.
Sure.
So what happened here was that the New York Attorney General, Letitia James, attended a promotion ceremony for the New York Fire Department's new chaplain, Pamela Holmes.
Because she presided over the investigation into Trump, some of the firefighters in attendance booed her and heckled.
In response, a union called the Uniformed Fire Officers Association announced that the behavior was inappropriate for the ceremony, which was about their chaplain was being held at a church and wasn't political in nature.
And so they were going to try and, like, Talk to people about how that was inappropriate.
But that said, I have also been too nice in many levels and realized that when I am a classical liberal, like a Thomas Jefferson, That in the modern communication system, that only aids the enemy's operations.
And I'm going to explain coming up.
This is very, very important information.
And I've also tracked everything they're doing is to show us things that in our epigenetic history didn't exist to completely disconnect us from our ancestors and our programming God gave us.
But it's also preparing us for the new system it's bringing in.
And it basically goes along the lines of they live.
And that's what it is.
The people, when you put the glasses on, aren't physically a walking dead space alien, but their spirit is.
And it's like Avatar.
There is a thing jacked into them, and at the moment it finally takes over, they just become robots.
Most of these people that are influenced by...
Satan and his minions, his pomps, his pimps, don't have kind of the Linda Blair model operating in them.
That's just one phase to terrorize and harass people.
That's just one mode it's got.
It's more like an NPC that has no morals and just greedily runs around following whatever stimulus it's given to believe that it's going to get some power over somebody.
But it's not human.
I've studied history.
I've studied the ancients.
I've also talked to a lot of people that have worked in secret projects and things like that.
But I've also experienced it myself that there is a higher plane to this one.
In fact, there's multiple higher planes.
Just as there are nine circles of hell, there are 12 dimensions just within this framework of this universe.
I'm sorry, I just wanted to be clear that he said, just like there are nine circles of hell, as though that was common knowledge that we've all just accepted.
Like, I feel like you understand that the reason that we have, like, models and stuff is because of limited resources.
I feel like the devil having infinite resources, or at least imaginary ones, should not have to have, like, okay, listen, I don't have time to be mocking up new people every single go around.
We don't just have Macron and all these defense chiefs over in Europe saying we've got to double down, we've got to go to full military confrontation, we've got to send troops in.
The mouth of the New World Order.
Fareed Zakaria, who, when you hear him speak, he's one of the only journalists led into the Club of Rome, Bilderberg, CFR, White House.
When you hear him talk, that's...
Communication not to the general viewers of CNN.
He goes on once a week to communicate to the underlings what the current orders are.
And we'll play a clip of him in a moment.
That seems all jolly about Russia and how things are going.
Yeah, what we need is a time machine that can give us...
Bring bits to Alex in different eras and get his different eras reaction to different bullshit so we can contain it in our own space, if that makes sense.
I mean, I just appreciate the, you know, like, I love journalism, and I love the way that they have ethics and all that stuff, but when you are a person who's writing, like, Putin won the election, Don't you feel shitty about yourself?
Like, I understand you're writing something technically accurate, but also you're a liar.
Nadirzhdin, who was fighting against the war, was not allowed to participate in the elections, and Navalny died in prison during your campaign.
Do you think this is democracy?
This is life.
If Mr. Nadezhny took part in these elections, This is what did not take part in these elections.
That means it was the result of his unsatisfactory work or preparation.
Maybe he should have avoided any mistakes of providing the applications.
As far as I understand, this was the problem, that he did not get sufficient votes to take part in the campaign.
As for Navalny, yes, he passed, and this is always a sad event, but unfortunately we had some other cases where people died in prison.
Did you not have these events in American prisons?
You did, many times.
By the way, maybe it will be slightly unexpected.
A few days before Navalny passed, some colleagues told me, not the members of the administration, some other people told me that there is an idea to exchange Mr. Navalny for some people who are imprisoned in Western countries.
You can believe me or not, but the person who spoke with me Before the end of the sentence, he said, yes, I agree.
You know, the correct position is being opposed to Putin, and it's being opposed to Elon Musk.
But both of those people are figureheads that drive the particular types of bigotry that underlie someone like Alex's business model and his worldview.
So you have this bigotry and this, you know, a lot of it is xenophobia.
A lot of it is transphobia.
Those things are so much more important than conspiracy.
It is like a weird total realignment in the past five years.
Or no, I mean, it's the past ten years.
I would say the past ten years has seen from 2014 who the globalists are and their goals inverted in 2024 to now whatever it was that I said they were doing in 2014 and that was evil, I'm totally on board with now.
But don't you think it kind of always would have been that, but there wasn't an opportunity for it?
You know, like, if Ron Paul had become president and had just started acting like a wild, like, solitary executive and doing all kinds of shit that Alex liked, his fear of federal overreach and all that stuff would have gone away pretty fast.
We're not at war with Russia, Schultz tells Macron.
Olaf Schultz.
NATO says fighter jets can carry nuclear weapons as tensions with Russia reach breaking point.
Yeah, when you load the hydrogen bombs on the jets, instead of an ICBM or a launch from a submarine, so it's five, ten minutes, now it's two minutes, one minute.
It's right on the border, takes off, goes up to Mach 2, drops the bomb, goes straight up, gets out of there.
Massive escalation.
Former UK spy chief, we're at war with Russia.
France mulled boots on the ground in Ukraine for months.
Russia claims it's killed 6,000 foreign fighters in Ukraine, including 491 Americans.
So that clip is less than a minute, and it begins with Alex saying that Olaf Scholz, the chancellor of Germany, has said that they're not at war with Russia, and then it ends with a headline that Germany's planning to bring back the draft.
All right, coming up in the next few days, because I want to do more research on it because it's so big.
The British government, with their top universities and government institutions, has put out a report called Absolute Zero, where they don't want to just have net zero increase in carbon or lower it to a previous state.
They want to get rid of all carbon, which humans are.
And I was going over this report today.
And it's so big, literally and figuratively, that I want to make a big deal about this, but I also don't care if other people like Tucker Carlson or anybody else goes and does it first.
I just want to get this information out.
It's so nightmarish that it's just hard to describe what they're doing, other than total feudalism, the end of civilization, as we know it.
And I meant to repost this on my X account, Relox Jones.
I didn't, so one of you guys that has access to my X account, please...
Post this and just say, very important information to understand the future, or very important information to understand why the globalists are pushing an anti-white agenda.
So the minute I saw this on my phone, my eyes are still pretty good, but I couldn't read it on the phone.
As soon as I saw rattle-hole groups raiding each other, or racial groups raiding each other, I thought, oh, I know what I'm going to see, because I couldn't read white respondents like we can now because it's blown up.
So this is a years-old study that's getting some play in the white victimhood-fueled social media account, so I guess Alex saw some dum-dum posted on Twitter, and now it's in the news again!
According to these graphs, white respondents averaged out to an approximate warmth rating of 70% For all groups.
The other groups had some variability, but no group rated any other group lower than about 62. All groups reflected a general favorability and warm feeling towards each other.
It's a study that people have been discussing since 2021, so the only reason for Alex to make a big deal out of this is that he saw a tweet and it made him mad and it got a fair amount of attention and engagement, so he wants to roll around in that muck.
Also, Alex is lying.
The white respondents had a slightly warmer feeling towards white people.
than the other groups.
He's just making up that 10% thing because it fits more nicely with the racist way he's trying to exploit the optics of this graph.
It is kind of a fundamental flaw with graphs if people don't even read the stuff anymore and they're just like, oh, well, Alex said it looks like this.
See, I think you can see at the end there that Alex has confused himself because he has no idea what these pictures he's looking at actually depict or what any of this was, what the questions were, what this even means.
His narrative hit a little bit of a snag and he confused himself and he just short-circuited.
Also, this wasn't a survey asking those people who they thought were the best.
Alex is completely mischaracterizing the survey because doing so plays better to the white victim of fears that he and his audience are animated by.
None of these groups responded with negative feelings about any other group I think if
you really had to distill down...
Alex just doesn't have any information at his disposal.
He's making up a bunch of details about what this means, how much hatred is behind this, saying things like, it's not all black people, but it's close to the majority.
So at this point in the episode, Alex has completely confused himself about this graph, purporting to show that other races think white people are bad.
And he's spiraling pretty hard.
He's gone from knowing everything about this at first glance, his prejudice of knowing, I know exactly what this is showing, now he has to put it off because he has to study more before he covers this and gives his thoughts, which is kind of embarrassing.
Also, Advil didn't say that black people feel more pain.
They were part of something called the Pain Equity Project, spurred on by research carried out by Morehouse School of Medicine, that found, according to an article in Fortune, quote, 93% of black individuals said pain has an impact on their day-to-day life, and furthermore, 83% said that they have had a negative experience when seeking help managing pain.
This research suggested that there's an element of discrimination in the medical field in terms of diagnosing conditions related to the disease.
to pain, which is what the Advil campaign was centered around.
Recognizing that pain exists and there Right, right, right.
confront the concept that even the medical establishment is infected by the idea that black people are somehow inherently stronger or more capable of dealing with pain because of any number of racist myths throughout the United States history?
You can't imagine any other ostensible news show just being watching it someday and then seeing like, oh, Wolf Blitzer confused himself and then walked out.