Knowledge Fight #901 dissects Alex Jones’ baseless claims—$400M Trump fraud judgment as proof of a rigged system, Soros-backed "corrupt" female judges, and the UN’s Disease X treaty as hostage-taking. He falsely ties Cheerios to gender-altering chemicals, misrepresents WHO Director Tedros’ role in Ethiopia’s 2009 cholera outbreak (193 deaths vs. "millions"), and peddles racist crime narratives while recycling anti-Semitic tropes about Soros. The hosts expose his cherry-picked studies, biblical overreach, and selective outrage, concluding Jones weaponizes conspiracy theories to justify bigotry under the guise of truth. [Automatically generated summary]
There's one, I want to say it was an ESP maybe, but it's like, there's a lick that's which, if you don't know the sticking on it, it's so hard if you're not a drummer to even understand how hard it is.
My friend group around that age, 18, 19-ish, in that span of time, spent a fair amount of time having strong feelings about the at-the-drive-in breakup.
So, Jordan, today we have an episode to go over, and we're going to be talking about Sunday's episode.
I figured, like, hey, there's so much big news in the world that we didn't really get a satisfying take on, because Alex is out of studio on Thursday and Friday.
I'm thinking about doing some shows, too, where I run the whole thing myself, just hit record, and sit in the dark with just a few candles and candlelight.
And talk about the nature of the world universe.
I mean, you know, a big old juicy ribeye, folks, is as good as, you know, sex with your wife.
I mean, let's just get down to reality here.
I'm gonna go Donkey Kong, King Kong crazy in about 45 days.
America sucks.
We're all racist.
It's over.
unidentified
Doesn't mean I want to go live, say, in some places in Asia where you get off the plane over there, folks.
And two of the three, separately, they were all there working out alone.
Two of the three, while I was there for an hour, came over to me and said, what was done to you in the courts was wrong, and we all know the corrupts are completely controlled, and what are you going to do?
And I said, what are you going to do?
Think about that.
I'm at a gym for an hour.
There's only three other men in there, and two of them are listeners.
From the records that have been released and videos that have come out, I know that Infowars headquarters has a gym in it.
In his declaration of assets, there was an entire room that was designated as a gym full of multiple LCD monitors, a full set of Kaiser workout machines, two punching bags, two massage tables, a rowing machine, an elliptical, three treadmills.
Oh my god.
If Alex is going to a gym outside of InfoWars, then it would strongly suggest that he's already sold off this impressive collection of equipment, which seems possible, because I don't see any other reason that he would be at a gym.
I guess the other possibility is that these three people were all InfoWars employees working out at the office gym, which would explain why they're so into him.
These interactions almost certainly didn't happen how Alex is describing them, but he feels like they did, which means that the globalists are screwed.
And I did also think, like, this has got to be Olive Garden, when I heard him describing it as an Italian family restaurant.
Didn't just take over several thousand cities and counties where they have the judges and they have the district attorneys and the county attorneys in their pockets.
And now many of the police chiefs.
They have these junkets that are on record where they pay for the hotels and airline tickets to the Caribbean and to the Mediterranean and to Europe and to Canada and to beautiful places in Florida, golf courses, you name it.
So this is all a really fun illustration of Alex trying to use storytelling and creativity to cope with the fact that he's in the position he's in, and all of the people he admires are getting charged with crimes.
None of this is real, and I would be curious what whistleblowers he's talking about.
But more importantly, you even responded to, why is Soros a CIA agent now?
It's lazy storytelling, but, you know, I think when you hear something like this, you really do have to ask yourself the question, like, all right, why aren't you blowing up a federal building then?
I think that they want, or there is a rational want for some oversight and maybe some changes to be made.
Some reform in many areas of the legal system.
That is fair enough.
But if you are acting like all of this is entirely captured by the evil globalists who are overpowered and in control of everything, you've got nothing left.
Doesn't matter what the law says, they do whatever they want, because, folks, they own now almost all of the appeals courts and the Supreme Courts of the states, and they are clearly blackmailing the Supreme Court justices, both Democrat and Republican.
Because all of them have taken trips and special favors and things that are kind of gray, but if it's a Republican, they're going to fry them.
That's a big shot across the bow of them coming after Clarence Thomas.
So Trump doesn't just have a month to pay his judgment.
He has a limited window in which he can file an appeal.
And in order to appeal, you often have to either put down the amount of the judgment against you or a smaller amount with collateral as an appeal bond.
It may be that he has a month to decide to appeal, and if he does, he has to put down a deposit.
And the Democrat judges are a 150 on a scale of 100.
I mean, they're like breaking the needle.
Off the chart, it's like if a car has a RPM gauge and it says 8,000 RPMs, well, I mean, people like this judge, Ingeron, are at 20,000 RPMs of corruption.
Okay, I'm trying to figure out a way for you to swear allegiance to something and then have somebody else find out about it without a written document.
I'm guessing that just some of the judges got, like, donations to their campaign from foundations that might be connected to Soros, and Alex is assuming that everybody did and it's a blood oath that they've taken to swear allegiance to Soros.
It's nonsense.
It's just really stupid.
And if you're listening to that, you gotta be like, this guy is...
And the few pockets of judiciary that still do their jobs are being hunted.
Soros didn't spend billions of dollars, the CIA taxpayer money he was given, to just open the borders and flood the country.
Soros has spent...
Billions, and he's just one of the big ones.
There's a bunch of groups.
To literally create this, where people shoot up federal courthouses, firebomb it, shoot people driving in pickup trucks because they're white, and they let them out of jail the next day, and the vice president bailed them out when she was the candidate.
People that shot federal courthouses were bailed out by the vice president.
I thought the medical system was the big globalist takeover.
I thought that fraud in elections was the big globalist takeover.
I guess Alex is just kind of mad about the courts today.
Hard not to see why, given that his hero just got hit with like half a billion in judgments against him, and Alex has to take the last two days of his show off to deal with bankruptcy issues.
Almost as if the thing that's affecting him most personally has become the central plan of the globalists.
Almost as if their imaginary plans map suspiciously well onto Alex's personal feelings.
We've been over this, but Soros isn't taking over the courts, and all Kamala Harris did was tweet a link to a bail phone.
And if Alex actually believes in the justice system at all in the American way, then he should believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
And if the courts determine that they're safe to be eligible for bail, there's no reason they should be forced to stay in prison just because they can't afford to buy their freedom.
But when we talk about people shooting at courthouses, it's an interesting point because there hasn't just been one person who's ever shot at a courthouse.
Well, there's like in 2019, Brian Isaac Clyde shot at the Earl Cabell Federal Building and Courthouse in Dallas before being shot by cops and killed.
After his death, they found his social media was full of incel material as well as extreme right-wing ideology, including a lot of transphobia and misogyny.
It's not a stretch to say that a lot of the material he was posting wasn't too dissimilar from the stuff you'd hear on InfoWars.
Or in 2021, Cody Levi Melby was charged with shooting at the Portland Federal Courthouse.
He'd been arrested two days prior for attempting to trespass into the courthouse while in possession of a firearm, an act he committed after attending a Stop the Stats.
I mean, I don't want him being like, hey, let's all go blow up federal buildings, but I don't want him being like, federal buildings are sacrosanct territory.
So the UN isn't saying that if you don't sign on to this treaty, then disease X is imminent.
Disease X is imminent no matter what, because it's not an actual disease.
It's a placeholder name for the future challenge that our public health system is going to encounter, so there's no point in squabbling about whether it's going to happen or not.
In Alex's world, this isn't the case, though.
For him, all of these diseases are bioweapon releases from the globalists, so there are conscious decisions that can be made to make the releases happen or not happen.
When public health officials propose a treaty that makes international cooperation easier in the case of international pandemics, Alex doesn't believe those pandemics actually happen.
So the specter of them happening must be leverage that the globalists are applying to scare us into signing onto this treaty.
Basically, it's a bunch of bullshit, but the plotline becomes a little more understandable if you look at it through the Infowars prism.
No, I was reading some asshole's point of view on Tucker interviewing Putin or whatever, and it was very much like, Tucker, the serious American journalist, didn't do a good job.
And he's like, no, you don't understand what anybody was trying to do there, because you can't understand what Tucker is thinking.
Like, you don't get it.
You think Tucker is similar to you.
As opposed to being completely different.
Sure.
Like, if you can't get inside the mind of this person, everything you say is going to sound insane to me.
Or at least look at it with the awareness of, like, this is what is being discussed with the subtext and the cultural context that these things are discussed in.
So the Cheerios issue here is about a pesticide called Chlormaquat.
This chemical is largely used on oats because it restricts the stem growth, making it so stocks don't bend over, which makes them, if they do bend over, makes them much more difficult to harvest.
In April 2023, the EPA sought public comment about allowing this chemical to be used on Sure.
There was a lot of study that's been done on rats and rabbits, and at high doses, they did find some negative effects, some involving the reproductive system, but that doesn't mean that that would translate to human concerns.
Pre That was the only application in the United States that was allowed.
But it was and has been allowed in other countries for agricultural applications.
So imported things and things that are produced in other countries.
All of this information that Alex is reporting on traces back to a paper recently published in the Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.
I read the paper, and the most you could say for it is that it suggests that further testing should be done, because it doesn't really achieve what I would consider concrete conclusions.
The paper sought to test for chloroquine presence in urine samples, and in order to do that, they purchased urine samples from various places, taken at various points in time.
Like, for instance, 21 of their 23 samples for their 2017 cohort were, quote, consenting de-identified pregnant women at the time of delivery from the Medical University of South Carolina.
The other groups aren't predominantly pregnant people which makes that selection seem strange.
So they also purchased 25 urine samples from between October 2017 and September 2022 that were provided by volunteers in Maryland Heights, Missouri, which is a suburb.
I have some issues with the information presented in this study, and it makes sense because three of the four authors of the study work for the Environmental Working Group, an organization that's known for making exaggerated claims and who have been accused of being a political tool of the organic farming industry.
In the past, their methodology has been examined and found to, quote, lack scientific credibility.
And I would suspect that this is another case of that.
The group put this out as a means of furthering advocacy around organic farming, and now Alex has picked it up and is morphing it into a means to delegitimize trans identity.
He doesn't have a leg to stand on here in terms of the actual information, but that's never stopped him before, and I don't even think he really has a grasp on any of this.
If you come to me with this array of piss and no explanation, no detailed explanation, even if your explanation was like, look at all this piss, we found it, I'd be like, that's better than, here's the piss.
I believe our most important work is still to combat.
Regardless, we put 30 years into this fight, everything else from here is pure gravy.
Because now, I've said a thousand times or more on air, my goal is to become obsolete.
My goal is for people to finally get there under attack and start researching the New World Order's battle plans.
They've been so arrogant, almost all of it's public.
And it's starting to happen.
It's starting to happen.
Now, unfortunately, so much of the plan is already in place.
They have passed the event horizon or the point of no return.
The system is going to crash.
But will it be a controlled crash, a survivable crash, or unsurvivable?
I wished I could turn this around, but I can read the Bible.
We don't.
And it's before the beast wages war against the saints and overcomes them, read Revelation, that then you have a few years of hell and then the greatest revival ever seen comes out of that.
So the devil doesn't win when he wins that battle.
So Alex is already obsolete because of how the internet and social media has evolved.
He has a great legacy in terms of harming the public information space, but there's millions of him on Twitter at this point.
No one needs his dumbass.
That said, if his goal was to make people research the claims he's made, I've done that, and I've found he's full of shit.
He has a habit of making things up, and he greatly exaggerates anything he's even close to being right about.
And tons of the primary sources he's based his worldview on are frauds, like silent weapons for quiet wars, or just things he's entirely...
He's going on about how he's coming up on 30 years on air, and honestly, it's hard to look at that and see anything of value that he's added to the world.
He's led people astray from pursuing legitimate curiosity, he promotes a ton of societal bigotry, and with his health advice, he's probably been an indirect contributing factor in a number of deaths.
And it wasn't until I went under the attack of the New World Order and committed to this war that I had become so satisfied that I don't even feel like I've been alive until 10 years ago.
I'm a totally different man.
And the reason I tell everybody that is this.
All these evil people keep committing acts of evil, thinking it's going to satisfy them, and they keep upping the ante, doing worse and worse things, thinking magically somehow they're going to be satisfied, and you're not going to become satisfied until you learn the truth and then stand for the truth, and then you are persecuted for the truth.
A cynical person could hear this and say that Alex is being fairly truthful, that he never knew satisfaction until about ten years ago because he became super rich after that point.
And just as the blasters, just as the main engines, if you watch how a rocket takes off, it's moving a few inches a second at first, then a few feet, then a hundred feet a second, then a thousand feet a second, and you watch it take off slow, and then...
I mean, you immediately dial into this, and it's like the engine...
Just objectively, just externally see it, and I think this is probably, if I did have those beliefs, if I was somebody who believed and was, you know, Christian in inclination, I would be offended by this.
So Alex's talk about this pandemic preparedness treaty is cartoon-level shit, and it's impossible to take this seriously.
International organizations looking at the mistakes that were made in the response to COVID and trying to see how we can all do better the next time is not putting a gun to anyone's head.
But you have to understand that Alex...
That's all fake.
And the people who are running the World Health Organization are the people who unleash the pandemic.
It's really impossible to have a coherent argument about the subject with him because he exists in an entirely different reality.
There are many valid criticisms of the draft proposals for the World Health Organization treaty coming from groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch who feel like the drafts don't do enough to protect all human rights and ensure that all people are able to benefit from scientific advancements.
Like, here's a complaint that the Human Rights Watch had.
Quote, the draft treaty says that requirements for preparedness, readiness and resilience are subject to applicable laws and national laws.
But domestic law cannot be used as an excuse for failure to comply with provisions and international treaties to which governments are party.
Even more concerning is that parties appeared merely to be encouraged to, quote, adopt policies, strategies or measures, but not comply with specific laws.
One of the most fundamental complaints that many groups have about the draft proposal is that it's not enough like what Alex is describing.
There is no set guidelines that are to be followed by people signing on to the treaty.
And if that's the case, then you have justified more crimes than you can imagine by not immediately getting an army together and attacking the UN, right?
It's World Governments Summit as it relates to the governments of the world, not a one-world government.
I know that Alex is an idiot, but there's a fairly simple distinction.
Also, is Alex pretending that Tucker Carlson wasn't a speaker at that summit, and in fact that was where Tucker said that it didn't matter that Putin killed Navalny because leaders have to kill people?
By the way, that interview that Tucker did is ridiculous.
I don't want to spin off and cover that entire thing, but there's a little clip I want to play for you here where Tucker seems to endorse authoritarianism for a weird reason.
What was radicalizing, very shocking and very disturbing for me was the city of Moscow, where I'd never been, the biggest city in Europe, 13 million people.
And it is so much nicer than any city in my country.
I had no idea.
My father spent a lot of time there in the 80s when he worked for the U.S. government and barely had electricity.
It is so much cleaner and safer and prettier aesthetically.
It's architecture.
It's food.
It's service.
Than any city in the United States that you have to...
And this is non-ideological.
How did that happen?
How did that happen?
And at a certain point, I don't think the average person cares as much about abstractions as about the concrete reality of life.
And if you can't use your subway, for example, as many people are afraid to in New York City because it's too dangerous, you have to sort of wonder, like, isn't that the ultimate measure of leadership?
And that's true.
By the way, it's radicalizing for an American to go to Moscow.
I didn't know that.
I've learned it this week.
To Singapore, to Tokyo, to Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
Because these cities, no matter how we're told they're run and on what principles they're run, are wonderful places to live.
They don't have rampant inflation where you're not going to get raped.
I grew up in a country that had cities like Moscow and Abu Dhabi and Dubai and Singapore and Tokyo.
And we no longer have them.
And what I have discovered is that's a voluntary choice.
As inflation is, as you heard in that fascinating last panel, inflation is the product of choices made mostly by the central bank, not exclusively, but by policymakers.
Crime, same.
You don't have to have crime, actually.
My children don't smoke marijuana at the breakfast table.
The government should be your parents saying you do not smoke weed at the table.
I feel like that's antithetical to literally everything that him and his community believe about these abstract ideas about freedom and how important freedom of speech and the press and blah blah blah are.
No, he wants authoritarian rule because streets are too dirty.
So when I was doing hearing aids, when I was going around doing hearing aids and all that stuff, I found my way into a lot of very odd places for a me.
So, you better pass our treaty, or we can't protect you from the new disease that's coming.
What person in their right mind, not knowing the history of biological testing on different countries, including the U.S., or how they cooked it up in a lab, or how the poison shots erased your immune system, and how they create spike proteins from HIV in your body, and you're sitting there watching a guy that murdered over a million of his people.
Under UN orders not to give medicine to people that had cholera.
Christians he killed.
To make room for the Muslims.
And you just sit there and you think, why in the hell would anybody listen to this guy?
Well, they're not.
The average American still got a movie they're going to go to.
Or a Netflix show they're going to watch.
Or some party they're going to go to.
Because you know what?
I'm not going to let...
The world get in the way of my fun.
But you look at those people that spend all their time in entertainment and all their time just having fun.
So also, Alex has some of the basic facts here wrong about the accusation he's making against Tedros, the director general of the World Health Organization.
Tedros was the health minister for Ethiopia between 2005 and 2012, then foreign minister until 2016.
And when he was running for his position at the WHO, he was accused of covering up cholera outbreaks.
There's not concrete evidence necessarily that he did.
I'd do that, and there's no way to put the number anywhere near as...
For instance, there was an outbreak in 2009, which caused 193 deaths.
That's terrible, and I'm not minimizing it, but I'm just saying that Alex is way off on this.
You can determine your own feeling about whether or not Tedros was covering things up.
The Ethiopian officials claimed that there were cases of acute watery diarrhea, but they didn't have positive testing that indicated cholera.
In any case, the UN was pushing for more aid to be sent.
So Alex's theory that Tedros' actions were at the behest of the UN Just doesn't make any sense.
Because if you don't have any reason beyond I'm a racist misogynist you start making shit up and then when you run out of shit to make up and you're lazy all of a sudden you go You know I hate black people, right?
When I publish on X or InfoWars, I think it's five, ten million views.
Just some white man walking down the street and ten black people run over and beat him to death.
And I see the comments from liberals going, why are you promoting racism?
If there was video of ten white people beating a black person to death, I would instantly publish it and instantly say it was wrong.
But I can't sit here...
All these brutal attacks the leftists promote and the Soros-controlled DAs have let the criminals and others the green line to rob and kill white people and then say it's okay to have open season on white people.
I'm against open season on black people.
I care about everybody.
I fight against the fact that over half the abortions in this country with blacks only being 13% of the population.
And if he was somehow forced to report on a video of a group of white people attacking a black person, you can safely bet that he would have reported it as being the black person's fault.
There was video of Travis and Gregory McMichael murdering Ahmaud Arbery because they assumed he was a burglar because he was jogging in their neighborhood.
Alex spent a whole lot of time creating excuses for the murder and saying, oh gee, I don't think he should be murdered.
Maybe he was a criminal.
There was video of George Floyd being killed by the police and Mr. Police State Guy Alex Jones spent incalculable amounts of time on his show covering stories meant to give the impression that maybe Floyd deserved it.
Maybe it was his fault that he got killed.
Alex is so full of shit on this, and the reality is that one of the show's primary editorial goals is stoking white fear.
It's consistent through his coverage, and trotting out black abortion statistics doesn't make you less racist.
It means you're an anti-abortion zealot who's using black abortion rates as a prop.
Misrepresentations of crime statistics are one of the major tools used by white supremacists to radicalize people, and it was that radicalizing point for many people who've carried out racially-motivated They have said so.
Alex is just wrong, but he's, you know, really gotten pretty far off track here.
Like, I feel like this was supposed to be a segment where he was covering his really bad fears about the World Health Organization pandemic preparedness treaty, but he just remembered that Tedros was black and he's just ranting like a racist drunk.
So I told everybody, the more you bully me, and the more you tell me not to cover this, the more I will cover it.
So you don't get one post a week of racist blacks attacking whites.
You get five a day now.
And keep complaining.
Because the real issue is...
Why can I find 50 videos a day of racist black people attacking white people, but I can't find one a day of white people?
And when it occasionally happens, it's the top story of the country, because they all want us killing each other.
And use your brains, black people, you're smart.
And white people, you're smart.
When everybody sees this being done to whites, and no one's told it's part of a globalist sorrows or war plan.
Whites are going to become anti-black when the vast majority of black people are hard-working good folks and do not support this.
So black and white have to come out and say no war on white people, no knockout games, no Rob Whitey, none of this, which the majority of blacks are for.
They're against that.
So am I. We have to get past this Soros operation and decry it for what it is.
And then we can save the unborn children no matter what color they are to have beautiful souls made by God.
So I went scrolling through Alex's Twitter timeline, and he's definitely posting occasional videos from TikTok that he finds of fights, but they don't really make a coherent point.
Yeah.
Incidentally, he also repeatedly posted videos of the Nazis marching in Nashville recently and commented, quote, feds on the move.
So I guess that wasn't a group of racist white people.
And if they ended up beating up somebody, I guess it would have just been the feds, so no worries there.
Nothing to worry about.
I was looking at his Twitter to get a sense of what he was posting, and basically he'll just retweet any case he finds where there's a black perpetrator or something and comment, quote, white supremacy is the number one threat facing America.
It's pretty dumb, but something I thought was more fun is when he reposted that video.
You know, I don't know if you saw this.
There was a video where a cop got scared by an acorn falling on his car and then just started unloading.
So there are tens of millions of slaves in Africa right now.
I have all the numbers right here.
So I posted a video on X yesterday that's got millions and millions and millions of views of reportedly an auction.
Why did you say reportedly?
Usually it's Christians they capture.
And they have them in bags as a presentation of the women to have kids around the house who'll do work for them and work in the fields and do all the rest of it.
And people said, oh no, there's no slavery in Africa.
Then I saw comments by prominent people on X saying white people invented slavery.
The most continual institution in human populations since recorded history 7,000 years ago is slavery.
But the point is, is that they're trying to create this guilt to create this division and act like modern white people have something to do with what happened in the past.
Alex doesn't need to feel guilty personally about slavery, but that has nothing to do with the point that people make about the legacy of slavery and how it affects people still today.
He can keep responding to fake points because they help him feel better, but it's...
Further, Alex keeps flashing like he's flashing his source up on the screen, and it's a CNN report from 2017 about a slave auction in Libya, which is ironic since Alex keeps telling me that the mainstream media is covering this stuff up.
They want you to think that only white people ever do slavery, and yet Alex's source is the mainstream media.
The reporting on this was actually very clear.
What happens is that there are thousands of refugees in Libya who are waiting to be taken by smugglers to the coast.
And to quote CNN, quote, He does not care if they have to live in slavery as long as they don't come here.
All this concern he's pretending to show is entirely fake.
They're a prop to him.
Also, on our last episode, Alex was trying to justify Putin's horrible actions by saying, that's a Russia issue.
So by the same token, shouldn't he see slavery in other countries as that country's issue?
Seems like he's got a bit of an inconsistent standard here, and I wonder why.
So the media won't cover this, except that Alex has used CNN as a source, and many of the details, like the $400 figure, comes directly from that article.
Sure.
Almost like Alex himself is proving that there isn't a cover-up, but pretending there is plays into the white identity narratives that Alex promotes about how the media only allows negative coverage of white people.
I'd be interested to know what Alex thinks those eight wars that England fought were to end slavery, England did send out, like, naval patrol boats to try to disrupt the Atlantic slave trade, and there is a lot of, you know, solid...
I thought that the mainstream media wasn't covering this stuff at all, and yet here we have a story from Time magazine.
The last headline Alex doesn't attribute to anybody was from the BBC, and the Irish Times article is covering the same territory that CNN piece was, and CNN was in the list that he had.
It seems to me like the media may in fact not be covering this up, but Alex profits from pretending that they are.
The point up to this point in the show is supposed to have been that the media just uses the word slavery to make white people feel bad.
And in order to do this, they don't report on slavery involving black enslavers.
But whoops!
Alex accidentally just read a list of articles in mainstream outlets doing the thing they're supposed to be covering up.
And you can see the way that he pivots.
Alex completely drops the idea that the media is covering this up.
And now, because there are all these articles, this is proving that Alex isn't making up the existence of slavery in Africa.
He shifted because he...
He accidentally disproved his own point but can't admit it.
So imagine you're in this situation, right, where you blacked out and all of a sudden you're two examples into the mainstream media never talks about something.
I mean, there is something almost enviable, if it weren't being used for such awful purposes, there's something enviable of being able to default position everything you're right about.
There's a power there.
It's a debilitating level of self-confidence, almost.
You are twice as likely to be shot by police per capita.
There are more white people than black people in America.
It's not you're twice as likely because there's more white people.
You are twice as likely to be shot as a white person per capita, meaning person to person, for every black, every white, because the police go to your house to the call.
They do their job.
They slow roll to the black neighborhoods and don't respond because they're afraid of going to jail if they hurt somebody or shoot somebody.
This paper has all but been refuted by repeated analyses of the same data that Fryer used, which was police shootings in Houston between 2005 and 2015.
Also, Alex is just absolutely lying about the idea that white people are more likely to be shot by police, even if you...
I mean, that's a just.
A 2021 analysis by the nonprofit Mapping Police Violence found that black people were 13% of the population, yet accounted for 27% of those shot and killed by the police.
That's over double the expected amount by way of population numbers, so for white people to match that, about 140% of all people shot and killed by police would need to be white.
Even if you consider non-fatal shootings, the same is true.
There's no national reporting on the number of such shootings that don't end up...
And fatalities, but the Washington Post did an analysis of 156 police departments in 2022, and one of their findings was, quote, Black residents accounted for 16% of the combined population policed by these departments, but they represented 30% of those fatally shot by police and 41% of those shot and wounded.
Sure, the police shoot way more people than they should, but research has consistently shown that they shoot and kill black Americans at wildly disproportionate rates.
Alex is just lying, because his worldview relies heavily on his white identity, and so the inverse of what is true is presented as true.
Ben Weiss of the Free Press sat down with Harvard economics professor.
The University of Texas in Austin last week discussed what it means.
To pursue the truth.
Fryer, a highly respected economist, told Weiss about the intense blowback he was dealt to him after he published a study in 2016 showing there was no racial differences in officer-involved shootings.
But that was before the police defunding and George Floyd.
Now, it's two to one, Weiss getting killed by cops.
And most of the time, they deserve it, folks.
Cops aren't perfect, men.
You know, there's a home dispute, domestic thing, guy runs out with a gun, cops shooting, that's almost, most of it is domestic disturbances.
People are emotional.
Cops will tell you they hate going to domestic disputes.
Those are the most dangerous.
I don't want their job.
Hell, I mean, they keep saying it's all these white cops.
Most of the cities, half the people or more aren't even white.
Anyway, this is a real change in tone from Mr. Police State.
Now, apparently, just because someone has the police called to their house in a domestic dispute and they happen to have a gun, it's okay for the police to shoot and kill them?
I gotta say, that's pretty embarrassing for a person like Alex to make a point like that.
So one of the other problems we have here is that Alex is just making up data underlying what he's saying.
Analysis from Mapping Police Violence reported out in The Guardian found that only 6% of police shootings in 2023 were related to domestic disturbances.
A higher amount, 8%, were the result of police being called out for a mental health or welfare check.
The killings were slightly more likely to occur in rural zip codes, with county sheriff's departments making up 32% of them.
And, quote, black people were killed at a rate 2.6 times higher than white people.
Native Americans were killed at a rate 2.2 times greater than white people.
And Latinos were killed at a rate 1.3 times greater.
Also, So, the point, Alex, is, you know, he's full of shit.
That's basically what's going on, and he's inverting reality in order to stoke the white fears of his audience so they feel like they're under attack, because that's heroin for them.
Their connection to objective reality is severed and their point is not being based on stats.
They're just talking about their feelings.
The essential thing to understand here is that what these guys attribute to the globalists is actually their own doing and in their heads.
For instance, Rob says that there's this mind control going on against the white man, but examples that you see of this on InfoWars is stuff like pretending there aren't enough white people in Super Bowl commercials.
These purported attacks and manipulations being used by the globalists against white people I think,
uh, probably...
I think a lot of these narratives and these worldviews are definitely things that are adopted by the audience, but they are also things that people who are even further than Alex, let's say, who are more explicit and overt about some things, see as a great fertile territory to try and get his audience down to even deeper things.
And I think that Alex, on some level, must understand that and is playing into it.
Me being on the other end of a color spectrum of viewers, we have the same shared experience with that.
No one wants to see anybody die because of the color of their skin, and no one wants to see these unelected bureaucrats making all these decisions who are pushing and pushing these agendas on the younger people.
This mentality is essentially a gateway to neo-Nazism.
What Alex is expressing is a fundamental view of neo-Nazis.
He's just not saying that the they in his rant is Jewish people.
When Alex incites his audience to such an extent, and he sells them a neo-Nazi worldview with just one little detail difference, he sets them up to be incredibly easy prey when they run into someone who's like, hey, you want to know who they really are?
And when you have this mentality of, like, everything is these shadowy conspiracies and all this, when someone tells you, no, no, no, I've got the truth about what you believe even, this is a conspiracy, you set people up to be in a position where they're, like, more likely to be drawn in by this person.
So we jump off the Alex's sort of racist digression that was a large part of the show, and he realizes he's only got a few minutes left, and he hasn't covered the Cheerios story.
This is from the New York Post, and he just adds the gender bending thing at the end.
That's not in the headline, but because Alex wants to make this a transphobic narrative, he just adds those words in to make it fit more nicely for him.
Nothing in the article's text itself justifies this addition to the headline, so the only reason Alex would do this is because he needs this source to say one thing for his narrative when it actually doesn't.
What I'm saying is that Alex is a conscious, knowing liar.
Yeah, you know, I was thinking about some sort of form.
You know, like, the thing about what we do is such a weird, almost, like, form of journalism, in a sense.
And the more I thought about it, the more I thought that this is kind of the only way to be a media watchdog, is to always be on, if that makes sense.
Do you know what I mean?
If you are any other kind of watchdog source, you can only, like, oh, this is interesting enough that it'll penetrate, or oh, this is important enough that it'll penetrate, or oh, this is something that...
At the same time, you've got to stand up against all this anti-white crap, and people have got to learn, because if you won't stand up against that, you won't stand up against nothing, and say, leave me alone, you're being manipulated by George Soros and the ADL, and leave me alone, or join me right now to save humanity.
Now listen, we're under a major globalist attack with your support, plus we have incredible products.
Also, you might notice that the people he's saying are running this anti-white stuff happen to be George Soros and the ADL, two lightning rods for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
That's definitely not an accident.
That's because these ideas, that there's a shadowy group that's playing white and black people against each other so they'll destroy each other, is an idea that features pretty prominently in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the tradition that is anti-Semitic conspiracy theory canards.
But also, Clormaquat doesn't age plants and make them produce more.
Alex just doesn't understand the basics of this story, and it's funny to imagine that he believes that whatever something will do to a plant, it will also do to you.
By his logic, since quorum quad is actually used to make sure oats stay standing upright, shouldn't this chemical actually be a good replacement for Viagra?