In this installment, Dan and Jordan cover the great meeting of the minds between "Daddy Hitler" Alex Jones and "Baby Hitler" Nick Fuentes. It's not as much of a debate as it was advertised to be, but it's just as bad as one would expect.
knowledge fight damn and jordan i am sweating knowledgefight.com it's time to pray i have great respect for knowledge fight knowledge fight i'm sick of them posing as if they're the good guys saying we are the bad guys knowledge fight
dan and jordan knowledge fight need money stop it andy and kansas andy and kansas andy andy and kansas andy andy andy it's time to pray andy and kansas you're on the air thanks for holding us Hey everybody!
And there's essentially no control that you can add to the ball or anything.
And it's like, okay, if you memorize how to get through the holes and how much the wind is going to affect things, you can basically just memorize the holes.
In a way that, you know, it's hard to explain to people, but it is just like, I can read, you know, I read six of them in the past couple of days, and it is just like a constant jolt of...
I thought that in the context of the situation that's going on in Israel and Gaza right now, the last thing I wanted to hear was these two ding-dongs talk about it.
And we have Nick Foyntes coming in here for at least an hour and a half.
He was just on American Journal with Chase Geyser hosting it because...
Harrison is hosting the war while Owen is in federal prison for his free speech, according to the judge, in our wondrous free land.
And so I build this, because I guess we will have a debate as a debate, but really I just want to have a discussion with Nick Foyntes, so that's coming up.
I think we should get him in here about 15 after next hour.
At the same time, the idea of Nick and Alex debating Israel and Palestine, that's a good marketing hook.
You can see right here at the beginning that Alex tried to build this up as a debate in order to drive traffic, but he doesn't want the challenge of actually going up against Nick.
Media star Bobby Barnes tried to debate Nick a few years back, and it was...
Fucking embarrassing.
And Alex was there for that.
He knows better.
Yeah.
Chase Geyser is the new white dork hanging around InfoWars, and I guess he's gotten the call to the big times now that Owen's in jail and Harrison got bumped up to prime time.
I don't know much about this guy, except that he hosts a podcast about how tough Americans have it, and he was hosting the other day wearing suspenders.
So when I'm concerned about Islam spreading everywhere and taking over, how does that, because Islam doesn't like Israel, now I'm with Israel.
It's false debate.
And it's not real.
And it's very frustrating.
So for me, when I have my discussion with him slash debate, it's not about proving my point.
It's about getting people to see what I see.
And maybe you see something different than I see, but man, it doesn't matter whether you love Israel or hate Israel or you're neutral on it or indifferent.
What the hell does that have to do with bringing Muslims here from all over the world that are almost all joining the left and electing leftists to Congress and to local government and literally taking over our society?
So I guess his strategy is to show him a bunch of articles that Infowars has reposted from other outlets and then be like, can't we all just hate Muslims?
That seems to be what he's articulating as a strategy.
So what Alex fails to understand, somewhat intentionally, is that comparing this conflict to a battle between gangs like the Crips and Bloods is actually wildly pro-Israel in its framing.
This is because it fails to take into consideration the power differential and the dynamic that exists between the two parties.
Could the Crips keep all the Bloods and all the civilians who weren't Bloods but were also part of the same ethnic group as them in what amounts to an open-air prison?
Could the Bloods shut off all the access to the Crips' electricity, water, and food?
If you ask yourself questions like these, you can see how reducing the conflict in the Middle East down to being like two warring gangs takes away very important detail that's necessary to take into account if you want to have any kind of realistic discussion about this.
It's a very pro-Israeli government position to look at this as two warring gangs because it removes the aspect of their overwhelming power advantage.
I suspect Alex knows this and he thinks that...
This kind of flimsy-ass argument is going to play.
If Nick were to want to counter this, it would be the easiest thing.
Yeah, it's a little bit like if the Crips and the Bloods were fighting, but the Crips had a $300 billion budget for weapons and the backing of the United States military and a complete...
Overwhelming control over the territory that was given to them by a coalition of...
So when I saw him this morning, they said, oh, he's been saying it over and over again.
On the one segment I watched, say twice, Jones doesn't ever criticize Israel.
His coverage isn't fair.
I just saw that, and I was just like, that's not true.
And I just thought about my show yesterday or the day before or the day before that.
Now, it's true.
On October 7th, when we saw the terrible images and the invasion into Israel and that mass murder and slaughter, including a bunch of liberal Jews that moved there that are pro-Palestine and want a two-state solution or a one-state solution or think Israel should just totally integrate with the Islamic world, see how that works if they do it.
That's just suicide.
And I was very critical because Hamas launched that big bloody attack.
And then when Israel now has overreacted, I've said, this is terrible.
And it is a trap that is bad for everybody, and the children don't deserve this.
And they've signed a billion-dollar deal with Bill Gates and a consortium to put into the breading on chicken, all those TV dinners you get, you name it, bug protein, and they've got deals with the Food and Drug Administration to just give insects a code number.
On the back, so that you don't know you're eating dangerous bug chitin protein that's absolutely linked to cancer, strokes, and so many problems.
What the hell does that have to do with Israel?
Four hours on Israel.
I would jump off a cliff.
I'm trying to stop our food supply from getting taken over by a bunch of damn bugs.
So Tyson isn't making decisions based on things from Bill Gates.
What happened here...
This is the story that Alex is lying about.
They're investing in a company called Protix, which works...
In the field of insect ingredients.
This isn't about putting bugs into your Tyson chicken, and Alex 100% doesn't understand chitin.
This is about pet and animal food production.
Here's from a CNN article about their investment.
Quote, Tyson doesn't make pet food, but it does sell its animal byproducts for use in the pet food and aquaculture market, which feeds fish, the CFO said.
Byproducts like animal fats, hides, and inedible proteins, if not used or reduced, can end up in landfills.
In this case, Tyson can send what's in the stomach of a cattle it has processed to a protix facility, where it's fed to insects.
For the company, creating a larger market for this type of waste can not only reduce waste, but offer a larger revenue stream.
Tyson told CNN, quote, one feature of being in the animal protein business is having to figure out how to derive value from waste.
We saw this as an extension of our existing business.
I know that being force-fed bugs is like the hot new kink in the conspiracy world, but covering this story that way is fucking dishonest.
Not a shock that it's Alex's angle, though, because he's a lazy liar.
It's hard to look at Alex acting like that and not see him as being a little kid really trying hard to get attention.
The kids learned that it gets more attention when it misbehaves, so when it's not getting any attention, it'll say, look at me, I'm over here doing all these things I'm not supposed to do.
All right, yeah, well, I did watch your show today, and I watched your show yesterday, and on Saturday I saw you call me out, and I said about you that you believe in these conspiracy theories about 9-11, about mass shootings, but you said that Israel did not blow up that hospital on Friday, but it was the Palestinians.
And I said that that's interesting because, I mean, to me, directionally, We know that Israel does this sort of thing all the time.
They blow up hospitals, schools, mosques, and he's going somewhere else here.
So, one of the things that's kind of interesting there is, like, whether or not, you know, regardless of the reality of what happened with the hospital, Nick does make a good point in terms of directionalness.
Like, the way that Alex constructs conspiracies, he should, based on what available information there is, his conspiracy would make sense to go the other direction.
So the thing that I've noticed about conservatives is this.
This is my perspective.
And I just want to clarify, I don't think you're dishonest.
I don't think I've accused you of lying or anything like that.
I've said on my show we have a disagreement.
I think we have a fundamental disagreement.
But what I've noticed is that a lot of conservatives, there's really like two acceptable positions right now.
And one acceptable position is that you're pro-Israel and you see these guys like Shapiro and Levin and Prager and the usual suspects and they all want us to go and give Israel all our money and send our aircraft carriers and we have to support the moral case for Israel.
And then on the other side, the...
Other acceptable position is you can be anti-Palestinian, where you maybe don't talk so much about Israel or the Zionist influence, and instead you say, well, the problem here is these domestic protests with Muslims, and that Hamas is like BLM, and that Hamas doesn't actually hate Israel, they just hate white people, like the left.
And to me, I look at these two acceptable positions, and they're sort of the same.
It's like heads I win, tails you lose.
You can either be pro-Israel...
Or anti-Palestine.
But you can't be in this position where you say, I'm pro-America, and actually that means that I'm actually a little more anti-Israel in this case than I am anti-Muslim.
And so that's where I'm coming from.
I want to be the guy that says...
You know, I'm actually more offended by the Zionist infiltration of America.
It doesn't mean I support mass Muslim migration, but that's, to me, the bigger urgency.
Muslims haven't taken over America.
Zionists have.
So that's where I'm coming from, and I just think maybe we disagree on that.
I think that Nick is pretty fairly assessing the conservative positions on the current situation, and Alex probably doesn't appreciate it because Nick is claiming that the American first, like, the high ground is his.
He has the purity of the America first position.
Alex is so befuddled to come up with something to say in response to that, he just goes into plugs for Nick.
It's also important that you do not lose sight of what Nick actually believes.
He's using the term Zionist as a proxy for Jewish because it makes things seem more political than bigoted.
You may notice that the three examples of people who are on the side of Israel in the conservative world are all high-profile Jewish men.
Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, and Dennis Prager.
It would have been super easy for him to find other conservative, non-Jewish figures who hold almost identical positions, but that doesn't serve the purposes as well.
It is really important to understand the way that dynamic plays throughout this because there are going to be moments where Nick is very clearly saying something that is atrociously anti-Semitic.
And because of the way he's saying it, Alex is just like, you bet, buddy.
Leaves it in a position where it's like, who knows?
Who knows what Alex actually believes or if he sees the crypto-ness of it?
Yeah, I mean, it's obviously not exactly the same thing, but it would be like if I invited Alex on to debate anti-communism, and then I was like, I don't want to talk about anti-communism.
But the reason that it was in some ways acceptable for Alex to do this is because he presented it as if it was going to be a debate and he was going to be on the other side of this debate.
Now that it's actually come time to pay this off, he knows he...
So what I'm saying is there's a larger calculus here where the globalists in the UN are bringing in all these Muslims.
They're organizing them to be socialist, communist, and to join the leftist parties, whether it's the Democratic Party here or the Labor Party in the U.K. And I see their power really rising and them joining with the left.
I've seen a few good spots like Dearborn where they said, you know, we're right-wing, we're pro-America, we're not going to put up the LGBT flag, we're going to put up the American flag.
And I see them saying, hey, Muslims protesting, saying we're not going to have, you know, drag queen pedophile time at our school.
I don't hate Muslims either.
I just see them as billions of people that main religion says, we're going to take you over.
And then I see them out of the left, and boy, I see that combination.
I'm like, woo!
So I didn't get a call, as you guys like to say.
You have two acceptable things.
Be pro-Israel to the hilt and say murder all of the Palestinians, or you can just bash the Palestinians.
No, I mean, I think that with one major fuck-up later that we'll get to, I think Nick could have stood to radicalize a great deal of Alex's audience with an interview like this, because he does keep things generally within that sort of crypto language that is meant to skate by people's, under the radar, as it were.
Yeah, and I think that it helps when you have also one of Alex's great tricks.
That he's played over the years is the idea of the I'm above the left-right paradigm.
And whenever Nick is able to, as he does in this next clip, make it like, so there are these right-wing Zionist Jewish people over here, and then the left-wing ADL people over here, he has this I'm rising above that left-right paradigm.
And I just think Alex is deeply, deeply in over his head.
So the ADL, which you mentioned, they've had some of their employees tearing down these posters, but then the ADL fired them.
Jonathan Greenblatt went on MSNBC.
And he demanded that they fire some of their pro-Palestinian commentators, which MSNBC then did.
Now, a couple months ago, there was a big dispute between some of these right-wing Zionist Jews and the ADL, and people like myself and Keith Woods said the ADL is a problem because it's a Jewish group that's clearly controlling speech on social media.
You know, Greenblatt goes and brags and says he's got a line in with YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and he tells them what to ban and what not to ban.
We said, so we should get rid of the ADL.
Then all these Zionist Jews come in and say, well, the problem isn't the ADL.
They said the ADL has a noble mission, which is to fight anti-Semitism.
They said the problem with the ADL is that they attack people that are pro-Zionist.
And so, in other words, the right-wing Jews, they don't really have a problem that a Jewish group controls speech.
They have a problem that there's friendly fire sometimes.
Because now, fast forward a month later, and all the Zionist critics of the ADL and the ADL, are on the same side supporting Israel.
And Shapiro, who was criticizing the ADL like the ZOA did a year ago, he's now retweeting the ADL.
And the ADL's on MSNBC saying, you've got to fire all your pro-Palestine commentators.
And so I'm a guy that's looking at this dialectic where you're either part of a Zionist right or you're part of this Jewish left, and I'm in the middle saying that I'm an America First Christian, and I don't want to be influenced by Zionists or by...
Atheist, liberal Jews at the ADL.
And that's why I say there's this false dialectic that's being given, which you say you're not participating in.
But, again, there's a lot of people they want to focus on.
And I watch your show.
You focus on the Muslim immigration, and you say, well, they're sending them to America.
But there's Muslim refugees being created by Israel's wars.
So all jury is on the same page, despite the appearance of fictionalism.
Good to know.
Also, Alex clearly is either uncomfortable sitting there with Nick, or he had to fire his camera person, because he just keeps getting up to adjust the shot, allegedly.
So Alex should not want to shift gears after what Nick said, because a lot of what he said doesn't match up with his worldview, and it should require some kind of back and forth.
Nick is directly telling Alex that his position is not good, and Alex is just ignoring that, deflecting by saying that the head of the ADO is for...
And then Alex was like, aha, but my safe harbor point.
Let's shift gears.
You almost couldn't be a better platform being offered to Nick to allow him to suck up Alex's followers.
If you're just watching this, you're seeing a poised kid who clearly knows his stuff, who can articulate his positions in a way that doesn't involve distraction and yelling.
And then you have Alex.
But like I said, he clearly, Nick fucks up with the InfoWars audience a little bit later in a way that is spectacular.
What Nick is doing is very clearly signaling to his more extreme audience while making things palatable enough for most of Alex's audience to accept.
If you look at the comments on Alex's site, it's clear that the message was received by at least some of the audience.
Here's one.
Quote, Jones diverted away every opportunity about the jail.
I saw an expert distractor controlling the narrative by flattery and other tricks.
People need to understand how...
Deep the Jewry is in every segment of American life.
This is what Nick's underlying message is about, though it's packaged in what's socially acceptable packaging, like complaints about the ADL and all this.
It's become so mainstream and common within Alex's worldview that it provides incredible cover for what Nick is actually about.
Just because some of these groups have agendas doesn't mean when I have an agenda of not having open borders and bringing in new Democrat voters that are brainwashed against the country.
That's my perspective, and it isn't through the lens that you're saying.
So let's expand on that.
The ADL is, along with the Southern Property Law Center, creates the curriculum on record, it's come out in Congress, that teaches in schools, we're talking fifth graders, first graders, that it's inherently bad to be white.
You have an original sin and you're bad.
Well, that's like Hitler saying you're bad because you're Jewish.
So when I said the head of the ADL is the closest thing to Hitler I've seen, Not that people go, oh, you're saying he's a Nazi.
How ridiculous.
No, I'm saying China is very race-based.
So I said, Xi Jinping and his policies are pretty close to Hitler.
And then when the ADL is out teaching that Christians and Catholics are inherently bad, and that critical race theory to first graders teaching them that they're bad because of their color is incredible child abuse, but they're also on the left trying to teach kids they're another gender to cut their...
Genitals often sterilize them.
And your bad kids, because the Earth's dying, and they show them videos of polar bears that can't swim, which isn't true, and say they're all done.
And then I'm literally, when they have, you know, ADL galas, brother, they ain't talking about you.
They're calling for my arrest, and they're behind the law firms trying to, like, $20 million this year they spent trying to shut us down as in the federal filings.
So, let me tell you, the proofs of the puddings, okay, they are literally bashing and attacking, and their main target is me and Trump.
So, this is just standard extreme right-wing talking points about how tough white people have it, and then a self-aggrandizing speech about how much more dangerous Alex is to the ADL than Nick.
If I were Nick, I would just ignore all of this and move on to the next point, because none of it even requires a response.
But, there's an interesting dynamic that's going on here, and it's clearly that Alex...
Is personally offended that Nick would suggest that he's controlled opposition.
I mean, the thing is about Jews is that what defines them is they reject Jesus Christ.
Whether they're liberal atheists or they're religious Jews, they don't believe in Jesus.
And the only reason for what it's worth that I said that you got the call in sort of a glib way is because after Ye and I appeared on your show, you went on Steve Crowder two days later.
And said that me and Kanye were gay for Hitler and you went on this rant about how much you hate Hitler and said that, you know, we fetishize Hitler and all this sort of stuff.
And it just seemed to me it came across like damage control.
I always hate to agree with you because I'm so anti-bullying, and I stand by that position, but I do think that Nick's behavior does elicit a reaction of hostility in people.
I mean, you understand this, but Hitler's in a special category because the Holocaust narrative is what casts a shadow over the entire American political landscape.
And, you know, we have to talk about Jewish power right and left.
You can say F the ADL, but would you say F the ZOA, the Zionist Organization of America, with Mort Klein?
The Holocaust does resonate with people a little bit more than some other instances of attempted genocide, and I think there's some reasons you could come up with to explain that dynamic.
One is that it coincided with one of the most traumatic wars in history that involved most of the world.
The fact that this program of extermination was happening simultaneously with the world war is something that makes it more impactful to people and has more direct contact with a ton of other countries' actual experience.
There's also the fact that it was a program of extermination being carried out by a major industrialized country.
So there's a number of factors that play into this that...
That you could use to say, this does feel a little bit different to people.
And I don't know if that's fair or not, or if it reflects a negative impulse in people's minds.
I'm not sure.
Because there are certainly more atrocities than the Holocaust that have happened.
So as to this claim that Eisenhower starved like a million Germans today, I think Alex said four million, but that's not proven.
This is a claim that originates with a 1989 book called Other Losses by a guy named James Bach.
The book argues that starvation and disease deaths intentionally inflicted on German POWs were hidden in the Other Losses statistic in Army reporting.
Many historians have said this is complete bullshit, and that the other losses category includes people who were released or who were transferred to other camps, and that there's no evidence that there is secretly a stat of starved Germans.
But I also would argue that there's probably a decent chance they don't really care about that, and this is what Paul Joseph Watson would call virtue signaling.
You do have a sophisticated worldview for 20, 30 years.
You've been putting that out, and that's why I've always been a fan of yours.
I think where we disagree is that you see some benefit to allying with the Zionist Jews, and I'm against both the right and the left wings of Jewry in the world.
And Nick, like, one of the reasons that I find him an interesting figure in this Infowars space...
One of the reasons why, way back when Nick first started coming around, it was my opinion that Alex should stay the fuck away from him, and that's because Nick has a freedom about him.
In the same way that, like, Max Kaiser is able to talk shit to Alex to his face, Nick doesn't care about Alex's stuff.
He has his own brand, he has his own thing, he has his streaming platform that he uses, and he will not go along with things just to appease Alex as someone who's giving him a space to talk.
He will exploit this for whatever it's worth, but it's humiliating for him to not stand by his positions.
And so his position is, this Bilderberg stuff, World Economic Forum, Whatever.
Right, and we saw that almost be the entire dynamic of the Yay interview that they did, was constant offers of like, don't you see this is what we're supposed to be doing?
Well, he can hear me in the earpiece, but the difference of opinion is where the true seat of power actually is.
And the Bilderberg Group and the World Economic Forum, these are institutions which host multinational companies and representatives from governments.
So Bilderberg does not, in my opinion, have any real power.
The power is the people that attend Bilderberg.
The World Economic Forum doesn't have power.
The power lies in the people that attend.
The World Economic Forum.
You know, what is the World Economic Forum?
It's a meeting of 3,000 multinational corporation leaders and government officials.
The power rests in those people.
And like Alex said, the technocrats, the planners.
Now, when you look at the demographics of who those people are, the top hedge fund managers, the people that are running the major companies, and Larry Fink of BlackRock, there's a large Jewish representation.
There's a huge overlap between the people that attend Bilderberg.
And by the way, the people that donate to Benjamin Netanyahu's prime minister campaign in Israel.
And I think that the transhumanist sort of thing, when people talk about the Carnegie Endowment and the State Department civil society stuff, I think that that's basically a deflection from the fact that the character of all these people, I mean, their early life section, they all happen to be Jewish.
And the real evil in the world, as we know, is the antithesis of God.
It's the devil.
So who's the antithesis of?
God and the devil, it's the Antichrist.
And you look around the world, who are the people that are on the side of good?
You know, if in a spiritual dimension it's God versus the devil, and it's Christ versus the Antichrist, when we bring it down to the level of what's happening in the world, it's the Christians representing God, it's the Christians representing Jesus, and who's on the other side representing the devil?
Who's on the other side representing the rejection of Christ?
So, like, Alex is able to host Nick saying this comically anti-Semitic shit and then dodge any criticism for his own performance.
It's pretty smooth.
And on top of that, he can come back with a bunch of bluster and change the subject if he needs to.
Like, that's one of the things Alex is really good at.
I've never seen Alex use this kind of strategy with any other interview that he's done.
It seems...
Either intensely tactical, or the infrastructure at InfoWars is legitimately falling apart, and there's nobody to do any tasks left.
There's nobody to run coffee, there's nobody to work the camera.
All of his employees are essentially going away.
And I don't know if that's the case, but it would explain why Chase Geyser is there, and maybe those suspenders are attached to a barrel that's under the desk.
Yeah, because in Alex's fermentation of bullshit, there is a...
It doesn't matter who the enemy is, you know, it doesn't matter if the enemy this week is Muslims or this week it's Jews or, you know, the enemy is able to encompass the totality.
They're a billion and a half people and nothing is Chinese people on average, but they are the most homogenous race-based group genetically somewhere and they're extremely racist.
I mean, on average.
I mean, every time I talk about China taking over Hollywood and China involved and everything, I see the comments, oh, he's coming up from the Jews.
I mean, if I slip on a banana peel today, it's not Jews.
Actually, he doesn't have any studying on this because the news has broken that there's a new Speaker of the House in the U.S. Right, right, right, right.
And that is, I think, what he looks at as the general end goal he would like to see, which is a nation where white Christian men are essentially the only font of power.
And so he talks about that a little bit.
Basically, I would say almost explicitly saying that Jews are incapable of being right about things.
No, no, well, because I really am interested in your take on this, because maybe this is a source of common ground.
I'm with you.
When I see the Muslims protesting, it makes me mad because I'm thinking, what are they doing here?
They belong over there, not over here.
When they do the call to prayer, they're waving their flags.
I'm thinking those people belong in Syria, Palestine, and Iraq.
But what makes me even angrier is when I see Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, and I'm not inviting you to attack them necessarily, but I'm just wondering what you think about this.
These people, they don't seem to care about America.
The country's being invaded by immigrants, like you point out.
The censorship's out of control.
Forced vaccinations are occurring.
And they had the vaccination at Fox.
They had a vaccine-mandated Fox News at Daily Wire.
They had an agreement with Google not to discuss it on YouTube.
Now, they were never that mad, though, or emotional about it.
Israel gets attacked two weeks ago.
And I've never seen Shapiro angrier than he has been these past two weeks.
I've never seen the kind of Herculean effort.
It's like an alarm went off with Levin and Shapiro.
And they go on Fox and they threaten this country.
They say if America doesn't give Israel everything it needs, Israel's going to nuke everybody.
It's strange that Alex is just agreeing, because what he is agreeing to by sort of just letting slide is this entire they're loyal to Israel over the United States stuff.
And that's, I mean, he has to know.
Alex has to know.
He understands.
Just letting this stand and not pushing back in any way is a tacit approval.
Faced with all of the contradictions and all of the problems that his own thoughts have led him to, he gets to see Nick do so much more heavy lifting and he just gets to go, yeah man, that's so right.
If you just pull back from this, again, I think the whole Israel...
Palestinian thing becomes a distraction from war in Ukraine and dollar devaluation and fentanyl and pedophilia and social credit scores and UN treaties for forced injections and the WEF.
In all fairness, maybe you're right, maybe I'm wrong.
I just think what I'm covering is the most important stuff.
And so it's a perspective thing.
And I don't think there's any sacred cows.
You know, when the ADL literally certifies the curriculum in colleges, Down to the first grade.
Telling children they're bad because they're Christian or white or Catholic.
And the government says Catholics, conservative Catholics are the number one threat.
I say, Cain Martin-Dork, you can't criticize Nick Fuentes for what he says that's race-based or whatever when you're ten times more extreme.
So, I'm saying that.
All I want to be recognized as, I'm really trying to have an honest...
Well, I mean, in some ways there's an idolatry, and in some ways there's a figure that he respects that he shouldn't, that Alex is going to take issue with.
Honestly, though, maybe we disagree a little on this.
I actually support China's rise.
I support the Chinese-Russia coalition because...
I look at the American state, which has targeted people like you and me, and I think that the more that the American state recedes, the better that is for us.
Also, it's super ironic for Alex to say that Russia is an expansionist while they are literally in the middle of a war that's meant to expand the borders.
He's just desperate for a way to say Russia is white and Christian and shares a lot of the same bigotries as I do so they're fine and can do nothing wrong.
That's basically, and that is what the distinction is, I believe, between China and Russia in terms of what you're able to...
Project the balance of power equation onto it.
Also, there's so much of the white identity that's mixed up in it, so you can't be like, well, allowing China, which is so much the other, to accrue some kind of a global power that's dangerous, whereas I associate myself with Russia, so it's fine.
I just think that when people talk about the Uyghur concentration camps, I just feel like that's State Department propaganda, like atrocity propaganda.
So obviously I disagree with Nick, and I don't think that the abuse of the Uyghur people in China is State Department propaganda.
If I were in this conversation with him about it, which would never happen, I would not take the approach Alex is.
In an attempt to convince Nick that he's wrong about this, Alex tells a personal anecdote where a doctor told him that he was going to get a cadaver Achilles tendon from China or something.
There's no proof of anything here.
You have to believe Alex's story, which is a big leap, and then believe that the doctor in the story is telling Alex the truth, which is tough, and then believe that Alex is conveying the information accurately, which is impossible.
So that's, like, you can see what Nick does, and that is just ignore that entire story.
And refuting, not refuting, because he's not really, but denying.
Yeah, and here's the other thing, too.
Nick can choose to stipulate all of the stuff that Alex is saying is true and still maintain his support of G. No problem.
Nothing Alex is saying has any real impact on that argument, and I think that this highlights something that I've noticed about Alex.
He doesn't seem able to understand how to make a point anymore.
He's relied on these buzzwords and the same talking points for so long that he doesn't really have any greater depth.
And when you're talking to someone like Nick, who's thought about his positions and isn't afraid to bite bullets, like saying he likes G on Infowars, that's going to be a problem.
Alex has just got spaghetti to throw at the wall and, like, I don't know, one of those poppers that goes...
Because the United States would never be whipped up into a frenzy to go to war with Russia, China, Iran, if they thought that they were just adversaries, if they thought that they were just competitors or rivals.
So that's why in every case they need to say Putin is kidnapping orphans and he bombed a maternity ward and the Palestinians decapitated a million babies.
You might be smarter than I am, but I was really dumb when I was your age.
I'm impressed by how smart you are at your age.
So it's not a put-down.
I've studied Russia.
And other than being a strong arm and having problems, I find out of the whole world the best public push for families and children and Christianity, because I see that.
And I'm not a Russophile.
I'm not a Russophobe.
I just call it like I see it.
When I see China with the human-animal clones and all of it, man, I see the nastiest thing I've ever seen.
I'll just be, I mean, brother, I do some studying.
I love it.
I read what the Communist Party Central Committee puts out, and I'm telling you, China is bad.
So Nick is making a decent point that appealing to emotion and characterizing conflicts between states as good versus evil can be a way to convince people to support violent action in situations they wouldn't otherwise.
Or is this also a fitting description of what Alex does with his enemies, which are largely vulnerable groups in the population?
He spends all day demonizing immigrants, LGBTQ folk, and with a renewed vigor, Muslims.
And he always characterizes them as evil.
He even tosses in literal demons into the conversation, dehumanizing his enemies in a way that allows his audience to see negative things that happen to them.
It's not really that negative.
If Alex's audience had any interest in paying attention, they might notice that dynamic, and Nick is calling it out.
Also, Nick is saying that states call other states evil in order to justify attacking them, but then at the end there he says the US is evil.
That's weird.
Seems like he should have chosen a different word.
He believes that China is great because he is a dissident in the United States, and the United States doesn't like their dissidents, but China would like him because he's a dissident against the United States.
Now, I think that is not true in a sincere sense, but he would serve a great propaganda purpose for China's use as a U.S. dissident.
But I do think that they're better than what we have going on in the United States.
I think on some fundamental level...
It's almost like amorality being better than immorality.
The United States is led by, you know, and I don't want to keep going back to it, but it's what it is.
It's the ZOA on one side, it's the ADL on the other.
On the one hand, it's these atheist, nihilist types, and they're totally against any kind of religion, they're totally against any conception of God, and definitely against Christianity.
On the other side, it's these religious foreign nationals that are trying to ban the gospel in the Holy Land.
And even China recognizes that's who's really pulling the strings in Western society.
They talk about it all the time.
For them, it's just a geopolitical reality that when they confront the West, that's who they're dealing with.
That's where the seat of power is.
And so on the one hand, you have China that has really no morality.
They've substituted Confucian tradition and they've substituted their Eastern philosophy.
So yeah, he prefers China because it's just no morality whatsoever over there, as opposed to the United States, which apparently is run by the people who killed Christ.
This is one of the big things that the anti-Israel lobby does that is dishonest.
There are six major Hollywood production outfits.
They've been bankrupt forever.
And I said, decades ago, as I was reading a Wall Street Journal article, and I talked to people I knew in Hollywood, they said, yeah, Saudi Arabia is the second largest group, but China's buying up everything.
Now that's all admitted.
So the joke was, Jones says China and...
Saudi Arabia and Hollywood.
I was just reading headlines they were doing it.
Now China controls four of the six outlets, and it's admitted that they fund this anti-America race war narrative to destabilize us.
So it's true China puts gays in prison, and it's true.
That they do all that and that they're promoting three families or three children, nuclear families now.
You know, Xi Jinping broke with the West wanting them to not have nuclear families because China's not under globalist control now.
So it's kind of got its own version of its takeover.
So I think China is in command of itself.
That's why it's under attack by the globalists.
So you're absolutely right.
But China is still funding the left and the poisoning of America.
Yeah, I really think about it and it's like, do you know what's going on?
There's like 30,000 people who can make decisions right now.
And we all pretend that there's countries.
That's the reality.
If you added up everybody who could make a choice that would have a difference, that would impose its will upon this world, there's like 30,000 people.
And I have to pretend that it's China or whatever.
Well, I think that the point of that is that this is a quote from Brett Stevens.
Brett Stevens used to write a Jerusalem Post.
Now he's at New York Times.
He's like a big neocon hawk.
He wrote this book, American Retreat.
And it's actually interesting.
It predicted a lot of what's happening now.
But he's in favor of all these wars.
And Brett Stevens, he did a debate with Rabbi Shmuley four or five years ago about Trump.
And the question is, is Trump good for the Jewish people?
And I always love this quote because I think it summed it up nicely.
He said that he's against Trump because Trump is hostile to the liberal international principles that have been so good to Jews.
And when you really interrogate and think about it, and Hitler talked about the same thing, it's that when you look at a truly open society, a truly liberal, international, open society, that tends to be where the Jewish diaspora feels the most comfortable.
Because a lot of these liberal Jewish people, they don't want to move to Israel.
But they also, like Sarah Silverman, when they see an American flag go up, it reminds them of Hitler.
And maybe you've seen that clip.
She says, my boyfriend put an American flag up in the front lawn and it made me think of Hitler.
And so they have this sort of histrionic fear of nationalism or of white solidarity because they recognize that in any kind of country that's Christian nationalist or God forbid if there's a white nation, well, they're going to stick out like a sore thumb and be the aliens.
So it sort of behooves them for a country to be as diverse and sort of Star Wars cantina as possible.
When the baby's born, you're going to love it, and something's going to flip in your head, but when it's sitting on your knee at six months, man, you're a whole other man.
See, now that's an option that I didn't know was available.
And it's not available, because, again, I'm limited.
I'm limited in my imagination by professionalism, right?
I didn't realize that an option that's available to Alex on a show is if Nick Fuentes is making you feel uncomfortable by being, you know, able to talk to you about things.
Now, as surprising as this little conversation about you should have kids is, one of the things when you're doing lines of coffee is you're prone to mood swings.
When the universities and the public schools and the elementary schools are teaching white people are bad, I say to the left and CNN and ADL, all bets are off.
You can't point at this guy with race-based politics when he's a 2 and you're a 10 and then say he's the devil.
I mean, that's where I'm at.
I've tried to sell Americana.
I've really tried to get everybody on the same page.
I've done the best job I can.
I believe in everybody.
But my six-and-a-half-year-old daughter is homeschooled, but we put her on a lot of exercise camps.
She's like a little Arnold Schwarzenegger.
And she came home a few weeks ago and told me she was at this camp.
During the break at lunch, they aired over the air speakers.
She really doesn't make stuff up.
This is adult stuff.
She's super smart.
Veronica.
And she told me, they told me, white people are bad.
Am I bad?
It's over, folks.
Done.
Passed the Rubicon.
You won it.
You got it now.
You messed with my six-year-old.
It's over.
So, you won it.
You finally got what you wanted.
unidentified
I'm going to have you piece of my dog with his bag and his wife.
So also, you have this earlier thing where Nick is talking about the way that states call other states demons and they're evil in order to facilitate and justify violence against them.
But, you know, now that I think about it, maybe I think it's good because the people in the religions who want to do the fighting are fighting each other.
Not us!
You know?
Like, what if all the religious people got together and then came after the rest of us?
Yeah, it is an interesting thing where there is so much freedom that he has, and yet there is the inability to just cut the shit with your belief, like your insistence on, this is motivated by my religion.