Today, Dan and Jordan continue to follow Alex's awful coverage of the invasion of Ukraine. In this installment, Alex names his successor, declares that he's traveled beyond God's consciousness, and admits to framing a meme. Citations
The teachers are all struggling with their principal at school.
The school's name, I don't want to give it.
However, there was a giant...
Cut out of a football player from the Bears, number 34. And just so appropriately, the wind knocked it over onto one of the teachers' heads as just a metaphor for how they're doing at school.
It's like a semi without the ability to drive anymore, but it's going downhill, so as long as you can, you know, use the brakes right, you can keep moving.
Putin has warned that any no-fly zone in any country entering militarily will be counted as an act of war, and that the exact second, the very second that...
Any nation joins in with Ukraine in attacking Russian forces that Russia will be at war with that country.
Germany has responded and said that Ukraine's NATO membership will not take place, says the German Chancellor.
That's Schultz.
That's something that Putin was asking for before he launched this invasion.
So, on the one hand, this is kind of a meaningless piece of news that Alex is covering, but if you consider the point of what he's saying, you can kind of deduce a tone that will be verified as we go along.
When I say this is meaningless, it's because these aren't news items, and they're not unexpected.
Of course, Putin would say that putting in a no-fly zone over Ukraine would be considered by him to be an act of war, and he would naturally threaten to be at war with any country that decides to put one in place.
That's not a novel position, and it's not news, really.
Simultaneously, it's also not news to say that Germany is commenting that Ukraine won't be put into NATO, but that needs to be understood in context.
Prior to the invasion, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was saying that there was no plan to bring Ukraine into the group and had very strong hands-off perspectives about sending aid.
In the lead-up to the invasion, they banned any other country from sending German-made weapons to help the Ukrainians, and the extent of their support was just sending some helmets and $5 million for a field hospital.
However, the invasion was a very serious turning point in terms of how Germany, and Schulz's government in particular, feels about their place in the greater scheme of European affairs.
After Putin invaded, Germany went back on their long-standing prohibition of providing lethal aid and sent anti-tank weapons and stinger defense systems to Ukraine, which honestly is a huge deal.
Scholz gave a speech in front of the Bundestag on February 27th, which signaled a complete change of policy in German international affairs.
Quote, With the attack on Ukraine, the Russian President Putin has started a war of aggression in cold blood.
Scholz clearly laid out the aggression on Ukraine as being a clear and immediate threat to the security of the whole of Europe and proposed a multi-pronged plan.
The first element was supporting Ukraine.
The second was an attempt to, quote, divert Putin from the path of war, largely by way of economic sanctions and embargoes.
The third was stopping any possible sprawl in the war by unconditionally defending any NATO member country, in particular by beefing up presence in countries like Romania and Lithuania.
The fourth was coming to terms with the fact that Putin is in fact intent on building a larger empire.
And the fifth was rethinking energy supplies.
This was a strong statement of participation in the isolation of Putin and the recognition of the need to support the people in Putin's path.
This is a far cry from the position coming from Scholz a mere week prior, and that's notable because Germany was the main country, along with Macron from France, who were engaged in the peace talks with Putin prior to the invasion.
There's a real feeling here that this is someone who was deeply involved in the attempt to avert the invasion, responding to that invasion with a change in tone.
It's almost as though in those negotiations he was under the impression that absolutely we would be able at the very least to have a good faith conversation about peace.
And he's probably figured out that that was never part of the fucking game.
So this is essentially a QAnon narrative that Alex must have seen someone post a meme about on social media and he's decided to report on as if he did some kind of a deep dive on the subject.
What's fascinating about this is that this conspiracy actually predates COVID and has been a topic heavily pushed by the Russian state media for years.
Predictably, this brand of conspiracy was deployed to shift blame around after Russia poisoned Sergei Skripal and his daughter with a nerve agent.
The U.S. does help fund some labs in countries like Ukraine and Georgia, but the reasoning behind that is pretty simple.
After the Soviet Union broke up, there were remnants of old chemical and biological agents that had to be tested on, and much of that research that could be done on these things was being done in unsafe locations.
The U.S. and Ukraine entered into a weapons proliferation treaty in 2005 that was centered around offering funding to modernize these facilities that Ukraine was already operating so that they would have a far lower risk of something going terribly wrong, these nerve agents and chemical weapons getting out.
This involved a certain amount of information sharing, but ultimately the Ukrainian Ministry of Health was still in charge of these facilities.
Flash forward to the COVID pandemic breaking out and you see Russia and China both putting forth theories that the virus was made in a lab in Ukraine.
The reasons for this served a number of purposes for each country.
And for Russia, it allowed Putin to present Western involvement in and the Ukrainian government as a whole as a threat to Russia, which would then justify hostile action against them or at least rationalize continued hostilities in the Donbass region.
But now that Russia has invaded Ukraine, conspiracy theorists are on the hunt for anything that can intrigue people and also make Putin's invasion justifiable to their audiences.
So this old nugget is getting another chance at the spotlight.
Up to this point, I've really only heard this theory getting play on QAnon outlets, so I guess Alex has just decided, like, maybe I'll give it a shot.
It's really bad, and the only reason you report on something like this, let alone lead your program with it, is if you're trying to find ways to make Putin look good.
Like, sure, he's bombing civilian targets and waging an unnecessary war of aggression, but secretly he's trying to shut down these U.S.-run biological weapons labs, man.
He's creating a heroic story for his listeners to accept so they don't get the idea in their head that Putin is bad.
I'm not sure if Alex thinks he's being subtle about this, but it actually seems hard to imagine a way he could be more insidiously trying to get his audience to support Putin while trying to couch his commentary and like...
You'll notice that Alex doesn't struggle with statements like this when Putin makes them.
He doesn't say that Putin has said something, but who knows if it's true because he's a liar.
That kind of skepticism is reserved for claims from and about Ukraine, and there's a utility to this as well.
It's an attempt to give his audience permission to not believe claims that Russian troops are not honoring things like civilian corridors where non-combatants can leave besieged cities, which is something that has been reported.
There was an agreement to allow citizens to leave Mariupol that was ceased after reports were that Russian forces continued shelling the city, not honoring the ceasefire, which is an attack on civilians.
So Alex doesn't want that image to even be considered possible for his audience because then they might start asking too many questions and that looks bad for him.
I want to look at these examples that Alex lists in order to justify his claims that Zelensky and Ukraine lie about everything to see if there's any ground to stand on here.
In these sorts of conflicts, there are obviously some things that get played up for PR and to appeal to the international community.
That's part of information warfare.
But the question becomes, what is the nature of the thing that's being used for information warfare?
Obviously lying about an atrocity, whether saying one did happen when it didn't or saying one didn't when it did, is an evil form of information warfare.
Alex engages in this kind of action constantly, most notably with his lies and denial regarding Syria and Assad's use of chemical weapons.
As far as I can tell, there's no instances of anything rising to that level coming from Zelensky, nor does Alex even have a list that ranks anywhere close.
The first thing Alex claims is that the attack on the reactor was a lie, or that the idea that it was melting down and leaking is a lie.
People on Twitter definitely went a bit overboard with that, but that attack definitely did happen.
As the firing on the plant went on, Dmitry Kuleba, Ukraine's foreign affairs minister, tweeted, quote, Russian army is firing on all sides from Zapor, I'm not even going to try, a nuclear power plant, the largest nuclear power plant in Europe.
Fire has already broken out.
If it blows up, it will be ten times larger than Chernobyl.
Russians must immediately seize fire, allow firefighters, establish a security zone.
This, you could say, is sensational.
Possibly, you know, if you wanted to.
Or you could say that it was a person who was concerned that a nuclear power plant was on fire and that something needed to be done about it.
You could say that the comments he made were possibly inaccurate or over the top, but that's not a lie, really.
So, regardless of any possible overstatements by the Foreign Affairs Minister, what Alex is doing here is trying to whitewash the shocking act of the Russian military targeting nuclear power plant in a pretty dangerous way.
Other pictures supposedly of him have all been shown to be fake, and ultimately this is a situation where this person may be not a real single person.
There are a couple aspects of this that make it not the same as the malicious sort of information warfare that we've discussed Alex participating in.
There's no indication that the government started this story, as it appears to have just popped up on social media, which does make a difference.
Also, the intention here is very clear.
A huge fear in terms of the matchup between Ukraine and Russia was that Russia had almost comical air superiority, and that would be Ukraine's downfall.
By people on social media amplifying a folktale about a mysterious fighter pilot with an ominous It was a piece of information warfare that served only the purpose of raising morale, and I don't think that's the kind of thing you should really consider so heinous as to brand an entire country and their leader as a liar, especially considering it was a story that came out of social media.
As it turns out, they were taken hostage by the Russian troops and are still alive.
This wasn't known until Russia released footage of them being held in Crimea.
This doesn't actually change the real powerful part of the story, though, which is still true.
The thing that people responded to so strongly in that story was the audio of the Russian boat telling them to surrender and them telling the boat to fuck off.
And they tried to repel the Russian attack, but ultimately ran out of ammo.
In the end, they were captured, but that moment of telling the Russian troops to fuck themselves was real, and the attempt to fight them off was real, and that's what people were responding to at bottom.
Ultimately, none of the things Alex brings up as examples of things that make him sure that Zelensky and Ukraine are liars, none of it amounts to anything.
This makes sense, because all he's doing here is grasping at straws to create a justification for his audience to believe that everything they hear about Russian attacks on civilians is not true.
Because how can you possibly believe these people with this damning list of lies that Alex has presented?
It's all just more attempts by Alex to support Putin without having to say that that's what he's doing.
I don't want to say that it's totally okay for Putin to go into another sovereign country and bomb the shit out of innocent people, but I will say that it's okay so long as...
Propaganda that a country could put out, whether it's someone else puts it out and they tacitly approve of it or they even put it out themselves, of like, hey, soldiers get laid.
No, I mean, yeah, you go back and you think of those World War II propaganda films where it's like, news from the front, our boys in green are doing a wonderful job fighting against the evil krauts.
So anyway, you get a really strong sense from the beginning of this special report that Alex is pretty invested in supporting Putin while at the same time pretending he's not.
We have to realize that this planet and everything on it and what we're doing is completely and totally transitory.
And you have to just turn loose of it.
I think listeners and viewers know things aren't going to get very nice in the next decade.
The globalists plan to have 90% of everybody dead by 2030.
And I keep explaining, like, they really mean to do this, and they're really putting things into function that are going to end civilization as we know it.
And when civilization breaks down, go watch a movie like The Road Warrior.
From the early 1980s, and that's going to be like a vacation spot.
That hellish, dystopic, nightmare future.
In fact, guys, I had this framed over the weekend, or Friday, and I forgot to bring it.
It's sitting either on my couch in my office or on my desk.
I had it meant to bring it in here.
My door is open to my office.
Will one of you great folks go to my office and get me a diagram that's got a bunch of overlapping...
It's a meme I saw Thursday and I asked my assistant to frame it and it was already on my desk the next day.
So I want to show folks that if Smile just walked down the hall and to bring that to me that would be great.
Thank you very much.
And I think this says it all.
So what I'm doing here is I'm going to show you this diagram, and then I'm going to be a good boy and stop holding back and go ahead and just lay it out.
And, you know, when I lay all this out, a lot of people think, hey, that's great news.
It's coming out that they did this.
But then when you read the Spars 2025-2028 document...
Put out by the Rockefeller and John Hopkins and Bill and Melinda Gates group.
They talk about how when they hit us with the bioweapon, how they're going to get caught in the process and how that's meant to trigger the loss of confidence in the government and the system and collapse civilization.
When we covered spars in depth in a past episode, we went over this.
I'm not going to get too far into it again, but the part that Alex is talking about is just completely, this is just out of his imagination.
The idea that officials want to get caught with this whole web of lies in order to erode faith in the government, in order to collapse society, comes entirely from a part in Chapter 19 discussing the late stages of the pandemic response where after-action reports are being made.
Quote, emergency funding appropriated by Congress to fight the disease became available partway through the course of the pandemic, but federal, state and local public health agencies struggled to manage the procedural requirements to fight the disease.
As a result, significant amounts of emergency funds remained unused as the pandemic wound down.
As the investigations grew in intensity, several high-ranking officials at the CDC and FDA were forced to step down and withdraw from government in order to, quote, spend more time with their families.
Exhausted employees of these agencies, many of whom worked long hours, six or seven days a week throughout the pandemic, simply wanted to put the whole response behind them.
Little desire remained on the part of decision makers or those who served in the trenches during the response to rehash the events of the past several years.
In this fictitious scenario that's being used in this exercise, some people had misappropriated funds and possibly stolen some of the money, but instead of dragging everyone through the mud, they resigned to, quote, That's the passage in this document that Alex has transformed into the coverage that you're seeing him present here because he's a malicious liar.
For instance, the worlds of 1984 and Brave New World are explicitly at odds with each other, as was discussed actually at length in Aldous Huxley's speech, Brave New World Revisited, that Alex likes to cite and lie about all the time.
At its core, this meme is a complex Venn diagram, and that's really where the trouble begins.
The point of it is, it's obviously supposed to be that you're at this intersection of all these pieces of dystopian fiction, right in the middle.
You're here.
It's cute, but it's also really lazy, and it doesn't pay any respect to the pieces of fiction it's using as a prop.
So, at its core, there are four actual circles, and then everything else is just the intersection of those circles.
I'm going to give you the movie that appears in this meme, and you have to tell me the combination of what makes that movie using those four initial...
So anyway, the point is that this meme is stupid, but it pretends to be literate and making a deep point, so Alex has printed it out, framed it, and he's possibly mere days away from selling it as a shirt.
There's a ton of variations of this meme using different works of fiction.
Like, ones other than Alex's version use things like V for Vendetta, Logan's Run, Handmaid's Tale, Gattaca, Clockwork Orange.
The point is that the specific pieces of fiction are interchangeable for whatever other books or movies you want to throw in, because this isn't about making an actual point.
Yeah, but interestingly, if you look back over the history of this meme, you'll find that it actually grew out of a meme trend where people were making fun of people comparing everything to 1984.
Early versions of it were really simple, just a Venn diagram of 1984, Brave New World, and Fahrenheit 451 with a you are here in the middle, more or less mocking.
Alex has been on vacation for a week, and he comes back and he decides he should take time to brag about framing a meaningless and possibly insulting to him meme.
The movie Soylent Green is set in 2022, but it's based on a book titled Make Room, Make Room, which was set in 1999.
Also, the book didn't involve cannibalism in the form of Soylent Green.
That was an invention of the studio, so I guess Alex really likes the prophetic work of Richard Fleischer, who was the director, who also directed The Jazz Singer, which featured Neil Diamond at Blackface.
Harry Harrison, the author of Make Room, Make Room, has even said that the cannibalism idea is dumb because you couldn't process enough meat to feed the hungry people that way.
Anyway, the same guy who directed Soylent Green directed that.
Alex has seen movies that he wants to pretend are real, but he also knows that he would sound really dumb if he didn't pretend that these ideas were somehow rooted in a kind of literate background.
These people who wrote these works were envisioning the future they worried about coming to pass, right?
That's really not true in most of these cases, and often Alex is either intentionally missing or incapable of grasping what the actual point of any of these stories is actually even about.
Also, who gives a shit when these stories are set?
Brave New World is set in 2540, and Idiocracy is in 2505.
When we hit this, I'm going to try to move as quick as I can because there's obviously a lot to get to and I really need to get to all this.
And I'm just begging Lester to realize what a big deal all of this is.
And the fact that this information comes out and then it's like Blowing on a dandelion and the little parachutes, little spores, little seeds go out and they disappear as the wind catches them.
You don't know where they land or if they ever sprout or where that information goes.
But nevertheless, this information needs to find fertile ground.
So a great deal of this show, after the meme talk, is just Alex rambling in grandiose terms about how he's proven that COVID is a bioweapon made in a lab and all this other shit.
She was speaking at the University of Washington and had some very reflective things to say about the pandemic response and the messaging around vaccines.
She was speaking about how when the vaccines were being tested and they were seeing 95% rates of effectiveness...
That some people may have been too full of optimism and had too little caution, particularly surrounding ideas of waning immunity and the possibility of new variants not being covered as effectively by the vaccine.
This was specifically in response to a question of where improvements could have been made.
She was speaking about messaging failures less than she was saying that the vaccine didn't work, mostly because she wasn't saying that at all.
Alex seems pretty hot on this Spars document on this episode because he keeps bringing it up and making shit up about it.
I suspect that he feels like it's been long enough since he's really talked about it that his audience will have forgotten the main talking points surrounding the document and he can just use it to fill in whatever holes that he has in his conspiracy and be like, oh, it's just like out of Spars.
This thing about vaccines not working doesn't happen in that scenario exercise.
It's important to remember that this is an exercise based on public health messaging, so every chapter is meant to depict a particular challenge that could come up in the course of a pandemic in terms of how to effectively communicate information to the public.
In this scenario, there are two drugs that are of central importance.
There's a vaccine that's being worked on trying to get rapidly developed, Coravex, and there's an already existing antiviral drug that shows some promise of working against spars called Calosevir.
Chapter 9 is about messaging the dilemma of finding out that in further trials of Calosevir that it's not actually effective at...
And that pursuing it as a possible cure has to be abandoned, even though a lot of money has been put into testing.
People have a predictable social media backlash to the withdrawing of colosivir as a potential treatment, which is expressed as distrust that the government has any idea that they know what they're doing around the pandemic.
This is in no way analogous to the story that Alex is telling, and I'm being generous when I say that this is the part of the document he's lying about.
It's entirely possible that he's just making up what he's saying out of thin air.
The great researchers, thank God they're now fully awake and aren't naive anymore, at the Blaze.
Did something smart.
They put in a FOIA request concerning federal government spending on propaganda, pushing the COVID narrative and the anti-avermectin narrative and the pro-vaccine narrative that isn't a vaccine.
You can read the documents for yourself.
I spent an hour today reading them.
And the government admits they're real.
$1 billion was spent in the first year of Biden being in office secretly.
To buy off thousands of mainstream media outlets, TV stations, networks, newspapers, local TV.
This is just one program we know of.
One billion dollars.
And they had to sign an agreement that they would have no anti-vaccine coverage.
So when real investigative journalists FOIA documents, one of the really important things that they do is they post the underlying documents so people who are reading about their release can review the actual documents and assess whether or not they match up with the claims that are being made in the reporting.
It should come as no surprise that the Blaze article that Alex is covering contains no link to any of these actual documents they're claiming that they got from the Department of Health and Human Services.
The article that's posted on the Blaze has nothing to do with any information that would have been found in any of these supposed documents.
It's just complaining about media coverage of COVID and then pointing to already public information, like the fact that the American Rescue Plan Act, or H.R. 1319, contained $1 billion in funding for HHS to engage in activities to, quote, strengthen vaccine confidence.
None of the information in this article would require any FOIA documents to write, and I have strong suspicion that...
If this guy even got documents, they aren't as revelatory or shocking as he'd hoped, so the strategy is just to use their supposed existence as a prop while repeating other salacious information that's already public in the body of the article.
Also, to be clear, the $1 billion claim isn't from FOIA documents.
It's from H.R. 1319, and not all of that was spent on advertising budgets.
Without the actual documents, there's nothing being reported here.
It's just insinuation and vague claims.
Also, another important thing to point out is that these guys really fucked up their story.
The whole thing is about how the Biden administration did this.
But if you go and consult the Blaze article, they say that this happened in fiscal year 2021, which isn't the same.
Ouch!
No.
unidentified
Fiscal year 2021 goes from May 1st, 2020 to April 30th, 2021.
So it's actually something that happened under Trump.
This is partially because the Blaze article is cherry-picking information and not putting it into context for their readers.
They cite the American Rescue Plan Act as the source of this funding, but the language in that bill is really just a continuation of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, which was signed by Trump.
Overall, this whole article seems deeply misleading.
This paragraph shows up in the Post.
Though virtually all of these newsrooms produce stories covering the COVID-19 vaccines, the taxpayer dollars flowing to their companies were not disclosed to audiences in news reports, since common practice dictates that editorial teams operate independently of media advertising departments and news teams felt no need to make the disclosure, as some publications reached for comment explained.
They have literally no evidence or even the suggestion of evidence that any of the money went to people who wrote news stories, news reports, or even editorials about COVID.
The best The Blaze can do is include a comedic video that was run on NBC featuring Elton John and Michael Caine that ends with a big placard disclosing funding from the NHS.
That's not even in the United States and it includes clear disclosure and it's a funny video.
If I had to bet, I would say that whatever documents they got showed that the HHS paid for advertising slots for PSAs that they made and which contained disclosure of funding sources, and now the story is being spun and saying they paid NBC to have Fauci on or some bullshit.
Also, important to point out that Alex is also making up details here.
The Blaze story itself is dumb, but Alex is also just making stuff up about it that doesn't even appear in the article.
Another weird point, though, is that Infowars didn't even post the Blaze story on their website.
They posted a write-up about the Blaze article from someone named Emerald Robinson Substack.
She seems like a far-right dum-dum, so this is probably some buzz marketing, or it could be that InfoWars is worried that Glenn Beck wouldn't just let them steal his content and repost it like Alex does with everybody else.
I'm not going to go on a wild goose chase, because I went to the FOIA site, and I searched his name, I searched the Blaze, didn't find anything, and I'm not going to search through every single HHS-related FOIA request.
So yeah, they paid for those to be made and probably paid for PSA slots, and I don't think that this is a scandal, but it's being made a scandal by craven, desperate weirdos who work for Glenn Beck.
Well, the feds say it's secret how much they paid Newsmax.
But they did.
And of course, Fox News.
That's why they would always say, I'm not saying you shouldn't take the vaccine.
Everybody should get their vaccine.
All we're saying is you shouldn't be made to do it.
Because they were told on ABC, NBC, you name it, Fox, don't criticize it in any way if you have to say everybody should take it, but we have a question.
And then that was the segue.
Did anybody at Fox News or Newsmax or CNN Did they tell you that they were being paid by the federal government with your taxpayer money and signed an agreement not to do any criticism or talk to anybody that was critical?
No, there's a complete disconnect from that stuff.
Also, Alex is making up the part about them signing agreements that they can't do any critical vaccine coverage.
That's not even in the Blaze article.
Also, a good piece of evidence that Alex seems to have forgotten here that's kind of a counterexample to what he's talking about is the most important person in the world, Tucker Carlson.
I mean, if the money was given to Fox News for the previous year, you know, then Tucker wouldn't be the most important person in the world because he would have to say, like, I'm not saying don't take your vaccines.
So they come to people and they say, you want money or do you want to be fired?
Do you want money or do you want to be sued?
But what good is all the money when you're giving hundreds of millions and billions of people a shot that double cuts their DNA and gives them cancer and gives them blood clots?
I guess Alex has now decided to imagine that he's being tempted to the dark side by globalists in his court hearings, and this is getting exhausting and really dumb.
His whole thing about how he likes to take meetings with these globalists is so fucking stupid, and this clip really brings that into focus.
He's pretending that he's cool as long as people aren't doing anything illegal, but these people are working for the devil to kill every human.
Alex has supposedly proven all their plans, and not only that, they've admitted he's right and that they want him to join them, so they're doing very illegal things.
Possibly the most illegal things, if anything Alex is saying is true.
Also, Glenn Beck had nothing to do with this article.
It was written by Chris Pandolfo, but Alex has no interest in the little people.
Everything that happens at Infowars is essentially dumb underlings carrying out Alex's will, so I guess he assumes the same is true everywhere else, and that everything at the blaze is a function of...
Of Glenn Beck.
Like, every Dave Rubin episode is basically underwritten by...
It does feel like what he believes all news organizations to be is a megalomaniacal lunatic at the top who's just telling everybody, like, doling out tasks until they come back.
You know, so you can differentiate yourself and make yourself look like you're...
I'm just about the solid, provable facts.
And then, once you've duped enough people into thinking you know anything about what you're talking about and your career is kind of falling apart, might as well just let it go and...
If anything has been gotten wrong by the theologians and the culture and the rest of it, is that the next level, you just sit there and play a harp and everything's just happy and total perfection.
If you choose to be in that presence and be complete, you can choose to stay there and be complete in God's presence.
You can choose to stay at that level of absolute connection to infinity.
I'm not sure what theologians Alex is referring to, but I suspect that it's just the illustrated children's Bible he reads out of with pictures of people playing harps.
He's completely insane and detached from reality, rambling about how he's been beyond God's consciousness.
The other possibility is that he doesn't mean any of this, and he's just a dorky fucking child trying to impress his audience with these meaningless esoteric ramblings about how holy he is, and in that case, I think he probably should be hospitalized too, because it speaks to a level of narcissism that is dangerous.
I know I'm banging this drum quite a bit, but just try and imagine him thinking he could be taken seriously in 2003 talking like this.
Because inevitably, I think when you have the tendencies of someone like Alex, you're just going to end up turning yourself into a trans-dimensional...
Bayer executive brags mRNA shots are gene therapy marketed as vaccines.
I'm going to hit this news and the rest of the story in a moment, but here's the clip of them bragging about it at the World Health Summit in the UN.
Here it is.
unidentified
Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy.
I always like to say, if we had surveyed two years ago in the public, would you be willing to take gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body, we would have probably had a 95% refusal rate.
I think this pandemic has also opened many people's eyes to innovation in a way that was maybe not possible before.
This was a guy named Stefan Ulrich giving a speech at the 2021 World Health Summit, and I think this clip really illustrates Alex's failure in terms of reading and listening comprehension.
The clip that Alex plays doesn't include Ulrich saying that the COVID vaccine is a gene therapy.
He's saying that the success of this mRNA vaccine should give people hope about the possibility for future gene or cell therapies.
Alex is just lying about what this guy is saying because what he's saying seems close enough for Alex to add false confidence.
can sell it to his audience, even though it's a lie.
Like, if you go to the InfoWars article about this, it includes this quote, which is one of the things that Ulrich said there, quote...
Quote, ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example for that cell and gene therapy, which is meant to give the impression that Ulrich is saying that the COVID vaccines are example of cell and gene therapy.
But he's not.
If you watch the full speech, he's saying that the leap forward embodied by the mRNA vaccines are an example of how he hopes progress can be made on cell and gene therapies that Bayer is working on.
I see no way to describe this other than a complete intentional lie on Alex's part.
It's a site that focuses on healthcare-related stories, and the name is a reference to how doctors say they need something stat, which is short for the Latin word statum.
Alex finds it intolerable to not be able to take every opportunity to present himself as the guy who knows everything, so he can't really resist just making stuff up to make himself seem smarter, even though if you know anything about what he's talking about, it just makes him look like more of a desperate idiot.
This article that Alex is referencing is from January 2017, and it's his attempt to illustrate that mRNA vaccines were never able to get approved because they killed everyone in the trials.
Here's a little clip of him talking about that article.
And it goes into how they set all this up and how they developed these systems, but how they had so many problems in trials with them having bad results or killing people that Moderna was in trouble.
You gotta go read this whole article, lavishly funded Moderna.
Hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine.
The essential problem here is that Alex is once again making things up.
This is about how an mRNA product that Moderna was working on for Kriegler-Najjar syndrome, a rare condition affecting the liver, it wasn't working, and it had run into troubles in animal testing.
Alex has said multiple times on this episode that it made people's livers liquefy, but this article is really specific that the drug never made it to human trials.
I think he's just making that part up because he saw the word liver in the description of Krigler Najjar, and he just wrote his own story about it.
It's making water livers.
Because of the difficulty with this particular treatment, this article explains that Moderna was shifting its focus into four vaccines for, quote, two target strains of influenza, a third is for Zika virus, and the fourth remains a secret.
There may have been some trials for prospective medications that used mRNA technology that resulted in some side effects you might say are nasty, but the same is true of many different medication types that are in trials.
Plus, you can find plenty of examples of pre-COVID mRNA studies that don't show horrific side effects like Alex is trying to imply was always the case.
It just is arguments shit.
But this article is actually, it is very interesting, but it's not really about...
The negative side effects being a problem for Moderna, and more of it just being like, their company seems like it's run by an asshole.
That seems to be a lot of what the thrust of this article is.
The problem is that that article is about how Moderna wasn't publishing information about their research, so no one really could evaluate what they were doing, or they couldn't It's about liquefying your company.
So here's what the article says in relation to livers.
Quote, patients with Kriegler-Najjar are missing a key liver enzyme needed to break down bilirubin, a yellowish substance that crops up in the body as old red blood cells break down.
Without that enzyme, bilirubin proliferates in the blood, leading to jaundice, muscle degeneration, and even brain damage.
Yet Moderna could not make its therapy work, former employees and collaborators say.
The safe dose was too weak, and repeat injections of a dose strong enough to be effective had troubling effects on the liver in animal studies.
The rest of Alex's entire presentation is just completely made up, which is why he's never going to read the entire article when he says he should, because he knows he's a liar, and the information that he'd end up reading wouldn't satisfy.
And why do that?
If he read the article, he would just have to editorialize and say a bunch of shit pretending it's in the article.
Why not skip that step and just make shit up anyway?
Everybody around you, you're saying, got really sick and Rob Do is still dealing with the side effects.
You are, I would say, a central hub in the middle of all of these other data points.
I, too, if I were Alex, would probably invest a lot of emotional attention into trying to talk about how this was a bioweapon plan foisted upon us by the globalists, because the alternative is recognizing that his stubbornness and inability to be careful and take things seriously could have, in effect, gotten everyone around him sick, and everybody that he cares about almost dying.
And that would be probably pretty difficult to emotionally handle, so I would probably retreat into bullshit conspiracies, too.
And then Mark Levin pulls out or something like that and then all the funding goes away for the blaze and then he, oh, I don't know, he has to fire Dave Rubin and Steven Crowder and then the fun right turns against him and oh no, he's crying.
And there's no interest among radio stations to syndicate Owen's war room, nor is there any interest in the American Journal.
The reach that you'd have would drop so fucking hard.
Owen doesn't have any real handle on...
Some of the stuff that gives Alex plausible deniability, which is the historical tradition of anti-communism and these far-right people.
Alex was baked in that world.
He came out of that from the John Birch Society, and because of that, he can rattle off all kinds of nonsense about Cecil Rhodes and what have you that make you think that he knows this shit backwards and forwards.
Can you fucking imagine Owen trying to get on the show and doing that I've been beyond God's consciousness nonsense?
Get the fuck out of here.
You wouldn't be able to intrigue the audience at all in the...
Dumb shit that Alex does.
It's a recipe for disaster, but I think it's fucking hilarious that Alex thinks that the thing that'll be like, okay, now I can retire is if Glenn Beck is doing a good enough job.
I think their funding goes away, and so the one thing that makes them special also goes away, which is the high production value and the appearance that's similar enough to an actual news station.
What kind of audience decrease did David Knight experience when he left and started doing his own videos on TikTok or whatever the fuck he's on, on Rumble?
That will be all of their futures, and Glenn Beck is...
I mean, he's just a dick who goes wherever the money is, and the money is in this extremist nonsense that's similar to Alex right now, so he appears to be...
On the exact same page and like, oh, Alex, you woke me up or whatever the fuck.
And I said, she's distancing herself and they are splitting off the foundation and they're putting, and so Dr. McCullough said this, Mercullough, not McCullough, his halo of being the angel and buying off the media and paying billions a year to control the press in medical news and to underwrite ABC News, NBC News, CNN, MSNBC, you name it.
But they're moving the halo to her.
But I said, if she comes out and actually attacks him and says Jeffrey Epstein is evil and says Jeffrey Epstein is a molester and says this is part of a satanic system, then she's not part of it.
And we shouldn't say she's evil if she comes out fully and attacks Gates for being part of Epstein and admits that's part of the reason she left him.
And she did it last week on CBS News.
So people need to give her the benefit of the doubt.
Because we've never gotten information that she's a eugenicist.
We've never gotten information she's a child molester.
Bill Gates' wife last year gave a speech in Germany.
She said, if you don't stop talking about this, those of you conspiracy theorists saying we're trying to reduce population, we're going to, a lot of people are going to die.
People, then the word went out, well, didn't you get that threat?
Like, oh, I got the threat.
You didn't, what you just think, like, we don't know how dangerous it is to go up against you.
Oh, my God, you threatened us.
Oh, my gosh, I'm going to run away scared now.
They think we're stupid.
They keep going, shell out to us, back off, or we'll get you.
And it's like...
Sell out to killing everybody?
Sell out to jumping in bed with a bunch of demons?
Alex seems to have really taken that death threat he's pretending happened pretty seriously, but this is also a little unnerving.
Turns out that Melinda Gates is a demon, according to Alex in the past.
But I mean, that's still kind of vague, you know?
He's really talking about a group of demons, so maybe he meant that she was like a really cool person who was making death threats on behalf of a group of demons.
Clear as day with a ring of rubies around it, like a corona.
And I actually said, you know, I've seen that symbol before, and I went and did some research, and I sent it over to the producer this morning, but that producer is off today, so I didn't see it in my full stack, but I'm going to resend it to the new producer, and I'm going to show you actually where that symbol comes from.
I said, where have I seen an upside-down cross with a red corona around it?
Nothing means anything on this show because he's just making things up to suit whatever is convenient for him in the moment.
Melinda Gates is presumably happily married to Bill, and she's a part of the demonic cabal and is maybe the worst of them all, but with that threatening Alex's life publicly and wearing that jewelry.
That's a great fun game that only gets disrupted when she's getting divorced from Bill and is critical of his association with Epstein, and now two of your narratives are running into each other in a way that shouldn't be happening if your worldview means anything.
Oh, what do you do then?
It's simple.
You just pretend that you never said all the stuff you said in the past.
No evidence that she's all evil and what have you?
It's fun, because what he's trying to do is he's trying to rehab her image, because the narrative now is like, hey, if people are trying to defect over to the Patriot side, let's give them a chance to.
So Alex does, I will say, surprisingly few ads on this episode, but he does one, and this is two minutes long, but this is a sales pitch where he's legitimately just describing a bad business model.
I'm in a catch-22, and I've tried to explain this.
We can sell enough Winter Sun and enough Rain Force Ultra, And enough X2 and X3 to fund our operation and stay the same size and fight off the Democrat lawsuits and the harassment and the dirty tricks.
If we could get these products in stock.
But they're routinely sold out on average more than six months.
And here's the catch-22.
When I sell them at full price, we would be able to fund everything.
In fact, I could probably do it at 25% off.
We've done the math.
25% off barely.
People are habituated where I always sell stuff at 30, 40, 50% off, so people wait until that happens.
Then I sell out of it quicker, but don't make enough money back because there's not a lot of markup in these.
So a lot of our best brands are now not available anymore.
We have to discontinue because you just can't get the products anymore.
The products we can get...
The price has gone up.
The supply chain's broken down.
I don't want to go up in price.
And if I discount it, people buy it.
If I don't discount it, people don't buy it.
So, like, two weeks ago, I go, well, I'm going to stop offering stuff at 50% off.
But then I talk to the accountant, and they go, well, you really need to move all this at 50% off just to be able to get money in to be able to buy more that's coming in in 15, 20 weeks.
And so we're doing this math and stuff, trying to figure out what we do.
So I'm going to tell you, I'm just going to make the decision right now.
We're going to sell down to just a few thousand bottles of each, or a few hundred bottles of each, of all these products, and then henceforth, the biggest sell we're going to do on these is 25% off.
Well, we shot ourselves in the foot because we do these ridiculous sales in order to have a money bomb, if you will.
A flash of money come in.
And we've gotten to the point where...
I think people recognize that our products are fine, but they're certainly not worth paying more than 40% off for, and so they wait around, and they know eventually I'll give in and do those sales, and so we can't make enough money to do it.
They called Tucker Carlson a Russian agent for wanting an interview with Vladimir Putin, but everybody else can interview Vladimir Putin from the New York Times or CNN, but he can't at Fox News.
It's how they handicap everybody where you can't even...
By the way, I had the Russian media through RT, we sent them emails saying, yes...
If you want to fly to these mountains, maybe on this date, he'll have a press junket, and you might get one question in while he's hunting.
We weren't going to go interview Putin.
I'm not going to go do that to maybe get one question into Putin.
I'm sure it'd be some cool mountain in the Urals while he's hunting God knows what, but no, I didn't go to that.
But I didn't want to go to Russia to be a Russian agent.
I wanted to go to Russia because I want to go to Egypt.
And the fact that they continue to drop in weird ways.
Unrelated to necessarily what it is he's trying to say as almost like a little brag aside where you're like, you only do that whenever you are kind of proud of something.
It would be so terrible if you stood up and said, I support Putin's war of aggression against a sovereign nation because I am thoroughly pro-Putin and I think he's going to murder my political enemies.
I said, looks like Putin's putting in his junior varsity, his conscripts, because they have a draft over there, using them as human targets to pull out...
The identities and emplacements for special forces of where the Ukrainian troops are so they can kill them.
And indeed, that's what happened.
That's a nasty tactic by Putin, sending in his greenest troops.
This is complete horseshit, and the example of Alex trying to lie about his past positions in order to make himself sound like he knows what he's talking about, in hindsight.
Also, if that's what Alex really thinks Putin's doing, then I think it deserves a little bit more of a rebuke than what I'm hearing from Alex.
Yeah, and again, this is all in function of supporting Putin while having a cowardly shield over yourself of pretending that that's not what you're doing.
He has the appearance and the delivery of someone who wants the passive listener and someone who's not engaging all that much to think like, well, he's looking at both sides.
He's looking at all the angles here.
And I think that he gets away with that with his audience.
But if you take the time to actually listen to what he's saying.
And ask yourself, like, why is he saying this?
What is the point of this?
You get such a clear picture of, like, this is all just Putin's support.
Like, here's a great example of this.
Like, why would he throw this narrative in to his conversation about the situation of Putin invading Ukraine?
And so I don't want to be like the corporate media that says somebody said something and then not show it.
Let's play a new clip that I hadn't seen until now.
I'd read the writings of his foundation saying it, and Fiona Hill, but I'd never seen him say it, where he brags and calls Eastern Europe and the Caucasus and the Slavic nations that border Russia, his former Nazi happy hunting ground, where he helped round folks up with the Nazis, literally.
This is something Alex just found on social media.
It's a 42-second clip that's going around, being posted by weird Twitter accounts that seem to be making the argument that Putin isn't wrong to have invaded Ukraine because Soros is agitating.
This is from a 2015 chat he gave at the Asia Society.
The full video is up on their website, and if you want to, you can go watch it.
It's clear, if you do, that Soros is talking about funding organizations that worked to promote democracy in formerly undemocratic countries.
That's the whole point of the chat, and Alex would know that.
He's taking this clip out of context if he didn't just get this little snippet from Twitter and decide to report on it like he knows what he's talking about.
And again, there's no reason to introduce this out-of-context clip into the conversation unless you're trying to support Putin.
This is a meaningless difference that he's suggesting.
And I think it's dumb.
And I actually kind of...
I don't want to say my heart breaks, but like...
It does bum me out when there are things that I'm like, well, at least he's on the right side of this.
At least we can find some agreement that the criminalization and illegalization of drugs, the drug war itself, is a stupid waste of resources that has been used to destroy communities.
The whole thing digging into Soros when he was setting out to have a conversation about Ukraine and Russia is super telling.
This is the most cowardly, weaselly way for him to support Putin without having to get his hands dirty by pretending he's talking about Soros, his longtime enemy.
It's just utterly weak shit from this asshole.
And he should have stayed on vacation.
Forever.
I told you, maybe it was before we started recording, or maybe it was at the beginning of the episode, I can't remember, but I lost patience with this episode, and we're coming to the point where I just lost all interest in this.
He's doing these things and he's using these specific talking points because they are ways that he can support Putin and Putin's actions without having the stink on him of being the guy who's like, hey, you know what?
He read a headline that said that Putin's weighing a cyberattack and instinctively, almost as second nature, He pretended to extend the headline to say that Putin is being hit with cyberattacks.
But the other part is that Putin's almost painfully intertwined with Alex's narratives at this point, that Alex can't really do much negative stuff about Putin without really tanking some of the plates he's trying to spin.
He's got this whole thing going about how Klaus Schwab is going to do a false flag cyber attack, so if Alex accidentally reads a headline about Putin considering a cyber attack, he's going to have to immediately invalidate it or run the risk of weakening his Schwab narrative.
In order to keep his own bullshit afloat, Alex is essentially required to give Putin passes on a whole lot of stuff.
He has to pretend to not know a lot of stuff, and he has to lie about a ton of stuff.
Real awesome use of time on this emergency broadcast, though.
Like, I can't believe he spent a half an hour talking about a stupid meme at the beginning of the show, and now he's playing troll videos from, like, four years ago.
What a fucking asshole.
So there's also that video going around on, like, TikTok and Twitter, some guys training with a bear.
Obviously, fucking unhinged and stupid, but also so transparently trying to support Putin in a way that he thinks is hedging his position to make it not something that could be damaging to him should people call him on it.
And I think that sucks.
I think it's weak.
I think that he should just come out with it already and let the chips fall where they may.
Stand up for the thing that you obviously support.