In this installment, Dan and Jordan do a little mini-ep to check in on Alex's feelings about Globalist hamburgers, and then Jordan sits down with Mike Wendling, author of Day of Reckoning: How the Far Right Declared War on Democracy.
In the business, in a business like wrestling with your brother and you pass away, I think obviously you would want your brother to succeed and do great things, even if it means...
Kind of carrying on this vein that you had been doing.
They were like a more poppy version of Simon and Garfunkel, but from Norway or whatever.
And then...
They were on the Ninja Tunes label in the UK, which had everybody who was, like, an underground producer, a bunch of, like, you know, it had, like, Lemon Jelly, it had, like, Roots Meduva, it had a bunch of really, really cool stuff on there.
It was all, like, electro, it was all dance, it was all rock or punk or something like that.
Because they had The King is the Convenience on the label, they just let everybody in Ninja Tunes fuck around with their songs for a while, and they put out this album, which is like an amazing remix album of this folk duo with all these different kind of instrumentations.
So there's one earth-shaking major piece of thing that happens that is actually a huge dud, and that is that Alex has Peter McCullough, COVID-vax, anti-vax doctor fella.
And Dr. Judy Mikovits is also joining us in studio in the third hour as well.
So I'm going to table all the COVID news that's totally off the wall insane until that happens.
Then we've got some really good unintentional comedy that I don't just go with comedy for comedy's sake, but if it's illustrative, if it's illustrative, if it really gets people to switch on their thinking cap, I'll do it.
The problem with this story is it reminds me of a bunch of other examples of this.
Because seriously, folks, not just Schumer, but the Clintons and a bunch of others put out photos over Father's Day showing how human they are, flipping raw hamburger and then putting it on buns with cheese.
And remember, they want us to, quote, eat the bugs.
Because to a pod person, doesn't even know how to turn on a gas oven, or charcoal for that matter, doesn't know how to grill a hamburger and get it juicy and sizzling and get it just right and put the piece of cheese on it and slide it onto that delicious bun, just crispy a little bit on top, just throw the buns on for about 30 seconds, get a nice little toastedness to it.
They know nothing about any of that.
Easiest thing to cook is a hamburger.
I was cooking hamburgers when I was six years old.
By the age of four, my dad's like, you come over here, you grill it, you learn to do it.
About once a week, my parents say, hey, I was about eight years old, cook us French toast and scrambled eggs.
When you're done, go mow the yard.
And they weren't being mean to me.
They didn't want an invalid, didn't know how to run the...
I remember one time my dad goes, well, it's time to re-roof the house.
And I was thinking it's a good family project.
We got plenty of money to hire roofers, but we're not going to do that.
Your uncle's coming over next Saturday.
And we're going to go today and buy the shingles, and we're going to strip that off tomorrow, and then we're going to re-roof the house Saturday.
I remember my dad pulling up at 3.30 at school on Friday.
It was in the spring.
We go home.
We tear off about half the shingles.
Didn't get it done.
Got dark.
Got up the next morning, pulled off the rest, and then roofed most of the house, me, my dad, and my uncle, into the night.
And then the next day we got up Sunday morning, my dad said, yeah.
We're not going to go to church today.
We're going to finish roofing the house.
And by about 1 o 'clock we were done and my dad said, we're going to Billy Bob's and getting you a chicken fried steak, son.
And that wasn't like some big thing.
It was constant.
We're going to roof the house.
We're going to skin a buck.
We're going to run a trot line.
And to these pod people, they don't even know how to grill a hamburger.
And they look at us and they think, these are weirdos.
They walk in here, these leftists, and they're like, what's the engineer doing with a firearm on the side?
Well, why do we have armed security here, too, that's all bonded?
Because we're not rolling over.
that have the deacons that are armed.
So when some crazy Satanist comes in or some Islamistist and starts shooting people, most of the time they don't kill one person before they get killed because there's trained men with guns that kill them.
It has part of the messaging, and I believe the way that this works is that they're trying to make eating meat look unappealing because they have these raw meat and these gross burgers and stuff.
And so if you're watching it, you subconsciously are more willing to eat bugs.
So anyway, this was all just a very desperate attempt at trying to get people to cover this in a way that Alex could capitalize on and get some media attention out of.
It didn't work, and so I think it's very funny to look at this.
We just want you off the air and to have your social media so you can't speak anywhere.
See how that works?
But separately, we're going to break.
It's key to have money to win a war, the information war.
I need your word of mouth.
I need your prayer.
I need to share the articles, the videos from InfoWars.com, Bandout Video, Real Alex Jones.
Real Alex Jones, follow us there on X. I need you to also support our great sponsor who got demonized and attacked my daddy.
And his great warehouse and his great products, this same CRO, kicked out of the warehouse and helped set up all our stuff and had his products over there that he was making 30% on.
All he's getting sued by the Democratic Party.
Might have moved all those great products when they kicked them out, but you can't get anymore to his warehouse in North Austin at drjonesnaturals.com.
I don't mean to say this lightly, but Stringer Bell may have had some of the most important words of our time, which is just, are you taking notes on a criminal fucking conspiracy?
This is exactly what criminals do!
The law says you can't, in knowing of a bankruptcy and collections coming, you can't knowingly then move stuff as if, like, the deadline.
You can't catch me until there's no home base law.
Man, does it sound like Alex is explaining exactly that.
It really does kind of sound that way.
Oh, wow.
It's his dad.
It's a totally separate business.
Totally different.
Also...
I think that if I were one of the family members of the Sandy Hook victims, as a plaintiff, I think I would be probably very offended by the assertion that I have no agency of my own, and that everything, whenever you hear anything that I say...
You're supposed to hear that as the CIA saying this.
I think that that would probably be something that I would not be thrilled to hear.
Yeah, it's almost as if that during a time period wherein he thinks it will be advantageous for him to apologize to people and appear as though he has the capacity for human compassion, he does.
But then whenever it is no longer advantageous, he does not.
However, however, there is also a balancing paranoia, right?
And I found it very, very interesting when, you know, when Donald Trump was getting arrested and showing up in court and whatnot, you didn't see huge, massive protests, even in Florida, the home territory, right?
What did you have?
You had Laura Loomer walking around in a t-shirt that referenced Hitler or whatever, and a few like online streamers or whatever, right?
Because if you look at what they're talking about online, it's that they are so afraid.
They believe their own hype.
You know, they believe that the feds are in their movements and everywhere and that everything's a trap.
So that's kind of mitigating.
Right.
unidentified
And I honestly do not think that, you know, we're going to see, you know, we certainly won't see like a repeat of the Capitol riot because the police will be more prepared.
Well, I mean, it's just because you're being sold that it could be the feds coming to break down your house doesn't mean it's also not good advice to not show up at a Donald Trump arrest, right?
I mean, okay, but if you look at sort of how the actual story progresses, right?
So there were informants within the Oath Keepers, within the Proud Boys, right?
And some of those informants were members of the group, right?
And what people just don't sort of like...
Yeah, really, when they're in a conspiracy land, is that doesn't mean they were agents, right?
They were informants.
And there's a really big difference between those two things.
We know, and you covered it before, the history of law enforcement and far-right groups and extremist groups is really kind of murky.
You know what I mean?
In this country, in other countries, it's not very straightforward.
But you take that sort of grain of truth, and in classic conspiracy methods, you spin it into, how come they won't say how many agents were in the crowd that day?
There must have been hundreds.
They inspired the riot, and it was all a fedsurrection.
That idea of, you know, in terms of all of these groups, and if you go through your kind of meet, you've kind of analyzed and classified a lot of different groups of people.
You know, you have your QAnon groups over here.
You have your Christian nationalist groups over here.
You have your Proud Boys.
You have your etc., etc.
All of these things.
And I keep asking myself, in regards to Dakota Adams, the son of Stuart Rhodes.
Yeah, he wasn't quite at that level by the time I spoke to him, but certainly that was it.
I mean, Dakota is a remarkable man.
Oh, totally.
He's quite incredible and unusual, and perhaps...
Maybe not a great sort of like template, I think, for like somebody who's leftist, just because, you know, he, you know, it's sort of like, if you want a bootstrap story, you know, this, this is it, you know, get yourself out of a extremist lifestyle and just try to provide for your family.
And, and, you know, I mean, he was, he was just.
Working really hard.
When we were there for a week in Montana, we were just snatching whatever FaceTime we could get with him because he was going to college at his job, had to take the kids trick-or-treating.
It was late October.
you know, it was, he was grafting, you know, and he, and he, and he still is grafting.
When you add to that, I suppose, the stress of what Donald Trump has been saying recently, which is, I'm going to release these people.
And he hasn't been specific about who he's going to release.
But certainly, people who might have engaged, or rather not engaged in violence or not going into the Capitol, you think that he might be at the top of his list, which includes...
Stuart Rhodes' main hope is that Donald becomes president again and then pardons all of them and then hires him specifically as the militia of the state and he's allowed to go around killing people whenever he wants, probably including his fucking son because he's an absolute psychopath.
If you look at, if you sort of timeline it against what was happening in politics, national politics at the time, what you have is you have a campaign that to the most fervent Trump supporters was like, lock her up, right?
Pizzagate really takes off in the couple of days after he goes on to 60 Minutes, the president elect Trump after he gets elected.
And says, you know what?
I don't think that's a real legitimate thing.
We're not going to lock her up.
That was just campaign.
And so you have this energy, right?
I don't really have any way of proving this.
It's just an interesting coincidence in my mind, I suppose.
And suddenly, then you have this focus on these fake pedophiles in a pizza parlor, you know?
Sure.
And that gets people riled up.
So, you know, Donald Trump, you know, might say, these Capitol rioters, well, you know, I've looked at it, actually, and now I'm not going to do anything about it.
That doesn't solve the problem.
Because then people will be like...
You know, all those people who are very, very obsessed about it.
And there's many people who are obsessed about this and call them political prisoners, and they've managed to build a movement, and they managed to sort of get the ear of Donald Trump.
What do they do then?
You know, what do they do then when their hope is gone?
It's hard to say specifically what would have happened.
I certainly wouldn't rule that out.
Obviously, I go into political violence in the United States and how it comes mostly from the right, not exclusively, but mostly from the right these days in terms of murders, terrorist attacks, and whatnot.
There's historical periods where the opposite has been true.
What I would like to interrogate, I suppose, because the book deals with the far right and what they believe, it's not so much what the people on CNN are talking about.
I always just look for specifics.
I look for anecdotes and how this actually sort of plays out.
On the ground and what people in Iowa think about it, you know, to take a random place.
I am, you know, sometimes I hear this talk and I think I really don't know what people mean by, you know, how it's going to herald the end of democracy or like, you know, what just what what do you do to justify like stopping that if you believe that that's true?
I'm not sure.
And I don't, you know, I maybe, you know, again, like, I find it hard to visualize, right?
Like, let's say Trump gets elected, and anything can happen, you know, because people ask me all the time, they're like, particularly people in Britain, you know, my friends in London or whatever, they're like, Oh, what's going to happen?
Tell me, tell me, tell me.
I was like, why are you listening to me, number one?
I didn't think he was going to get elected in 2016.
Sure.
You know, number two, I have no sort of special insight.
But I say, like, just be prepared for anything, right?
I suppose, you know, it's very interesting to read, what is it, Project 2025, you know, these reports that say, you know, this is how Donald Trump would run his next administration.
You know, but then again, a lot of that stuff is, you know, we're going to, you know, root out all these civil servant type people, right?
Sure.
And that doesn't necessarily, to me, to be sort of like three alarm fire type.
Right.
There's courts that will get involved with this kind of stuff.
There are people who will be, you know, very active from day one, as we saw the last time that Donald Trump got elected.
I was having dinner with a friend earlier this year, and it was in New Haven, right?
New Haven, Connecticut.
And so we're sitting there.
I was actually doing a story on democratic politics, not in New Haven, but nearby.
And this old guy, I hadn't seen him for years.
We're sitting in a pizza place, and he's a very sort of left guy.
He's a very left-wing guy.
And we're just talking about politics, and he says to me, if Trump gets in, who's going to stop him?
And I just looked around the room, you know, I looked around at all the sort of Yale students that we were surrounded with in one pizza place in New Haven, and the whole, and the blocks surrounding us, you know, it's like the heart of liberal America, in this, you know, blue state, in a completely blue region.
I ask you this question because I recognize what you're saying, but the Women's March, global, largest protest ever, multiple Supreme Court justices and the end of abortion followed.
And it just so happens my expertise is in the far right, and so I'm looking at these people, and there's all sorts of interpretations or assumptions or whatever that come along with that.
But that specific chapter goes into people who don't believe that there's any political solution, and they are hell-bent on violence, right?
We're talking about violent, terrorists, domestic extremist groups.
A lot of people in the book I sort of talk to, even though they're fringe or extremist groups, these people are very difficult to even find.
Sure, sure.
These people certainly won't talk to you in any sort of friendly manner or give any sort of reliable information.
So that's my way of summing up what they think, unfortunately.
There are some of the more Scary elements, certainly.
Right, I mean, and obviously the scariest of them are the, like, let's go hot shooting war kind of thing.
And I recognize that.
But my question upon reading that chapter was, if there is a political solution, right, which would be, like, electing Biden or whatever, Or, you know, whatever it is you'd like.
But that will be met with violence.
Is it a political solution?
Do you know what I mean?
Like, is the political solution in this regard to elect Trump in order to avoid the violent response that you might get if you elect Biden?
Sorry, the question, the perspective of their perspective, you know, their political solution is some sort of Trump, you know, maybe dynasty, you know, it's hard.
Again, it's nebulous, but certainly that's the first step, Trump getting reelected.
After that, what happens, you know, they will disagree.
And, you know, we saw during the first Trump administration.
About how these sort of things fractured because suddenly you're in power and suddenly you actually have to do things that matter and then you're not going to sort of please the alt-right at the same time as you're going to please the tax slashing club for growth or whatever.
I guess when you go to the hardest core of the hardest core, are they going to be very...
Pleased with Trump?
Well, you know, they're not sort of like down the line for him, I guess.
Some of these elements, like, that's probably a good way to think about it, right?
Because, like...
You know, if you have, if you think that there's a political solution, you don't start, like, start a foundation.
You know, you're not like Mike Lindell.
You don't sort of, like, advertise on Fox and then, like, you know, develop some sort of, what he has now is some sort of weird thing where, like, you can all sort of be poll monitors and organizations or whatever.
You know what I mean?
It's sort of, like, parallel universe.
Things like True the Vote, you know, and they make these movies and social media output and stuff.
So, yeah, if you truly think that there's no political solution, you don't do those things because, like, you think they are useless.
On the other hand, like in the back pocket, there's always sort of a threat of like, yeah, we're going to do something.
I think, you know, we don't get to hear that much about that right now because...
The polls are looking very good for Donald Trump, or a lot better than you might expect, right?
Yeah, well, I mean, look, I don't see Trump at the moment saying, you know, we are going to make sure we get the job done this time everybody brings guns to the Capitol, right?
Like, this is the thing about those arguments that I find so interesting of, like, the engagement arguments that I see from that kind of Twitter space that, like, you have to call us the alt-right, otherwise we'll all be so mad at you.
I'm not talking about far right, mainstream or far left.
I don't care.
Any media outlet.
Right?
So you are talking to somebody and you are saying to them, here is how I know you are far right.
Blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank.
Right?
Now, you have given me a definition for far-right.
If I say to you, aha, I don't believe blank and blank and blank, and you say, well, then, sir, that makes you alt-right, which is now a socially acceptable form of the exact same thing minus two little things.
I get messages from people who actually are arguing in good faith.
Like, they're rare, which is disappointing, right?
Because I am interested.
And the really annoying thing is that when you think that somebody is arguing in good faith and they aren't.
Sure.
They're sort of saying, I'm not a Trump fan, but I would really like to know why you think that what he says is a conspiracy theory or whatever.
And nine times out of ten.
Those people are actually sort of like fully signed up to voter fraud is rife and Democrats are eating babies or whatever.
You know what I mean?
Sure.
But, you know, there is one out of ten where actually they are like a curious person and they're like, hey, now we have the social media thing and so I can reach out to somebody specifically and they might or might not.
If we're going to transpose that back to the alt-right thing, you're saying that 90% of the alt-right are Nazis.
If that's what your descriptor is, is that one time out of 10, there is somebody who is arguing in good faith, then that one time out of 10, there is somebody who is in the alt-right, and you are describing them as alt-right when they're Nazis.
If you look at the substacks that these people pump out, it's just like, oh my gosh, get some new memes or whatever.
That, in a weird way, is almost more powerful than any specifically one of these groups could go.
look I have I have no doubt that the groups that I look at in the book will go the way of all the other ones that you know were in my book about the alt Yeah, I mean, there's definitely that.
I wonder, and this is why we talked in advance about how I was definitely going to bring up religion in this regard, especially in the way that you've just described these fractured, splintered, competitive, and frankly, incompatible beliefs all united around one thing.
It's hard not to think of religion, that old-time religion.
Yeah.
Whenever you hear, oh no, I'm a QAnon guy, and oh, I'm a Catholic, and oh, I'm a blah.
It's all the same in my estimation.
Like, the way that you've written these characters, all of these, like, classified groups, is that if you drill it down, somewhere along the line is magical thinking, right?
Look, this isn't in the book because I sort of did this after I wrote the book, but I was in Iowa.
To do some reporting on evangelicals and Trump.
And my editor suggested this to me, and I thought, oh gosh, I'm not sure.
I mean, obviously, I'll do it, because, you know, boss says.
But I find it actually, like, tremendously fascinating.
And specifically, what was fascinating about it is, obviously, we know that, you know, when Trump came on the scene in 2015, evangelicals were like, hmm, not sure about this guy.
He's divorced.
He's a bit of a playboy.
Sure.
Not one of us.
Now they love him.
And what has happened since he became president was that number of evangelicals has gone up in this country, right?
And weirdly, church attendance keeps declining.
So you have a lot of evangelicals who don't even go to church.
And actually, their faith is in a relationship with leaders and other community members that do not have anything to do with a church or your pastor or whatever, which is traditionally what people look to for leadership.
And instead, it's politicians and it's Donald Trump.
And it's kind of interesting and often people, I think, like, you know...
Don't quite get it right when they call it a cult or they call it worship of Trump.
I don't think it's that.
I think that's actually kind of belittling to a lot of these people.
But it's certainly a cultural and religious identity that's all become tied up.
And it's a definite trend.
Statistics bear it out and the experts bear it out.
I mean, it doesn't mean anything in terms of what is an evangelical.
If all it is is I self-identify as an evangelical, then exactly how is it possible for these people to make large pronunciations about what evangelicals believe if all it is is just people who self-identify as whatever on any given day?
I mean, to put it very simply, a Christian nationalist believes that the U.S. is a Christian nation, right?
And Christianity should run through the government, right?
Sure.
The nation should be run on Christian principles according to what they think Christian principles are, right?
Yes.
I think that's probably as specific as I can get about it because we can have a very long conversation about what Christian principles are and how they should specifically be implemented in government if you believe that, right?
Sure.
But that's the baseline definition.
And, you know, there's plenty of evangelicals who do not believe that.
I am trying, you know, I'm trying to sort of make it sort of make sense in a way.
Otherwise, it would just be like, you know, in 50,000 words of stream of consciousness, you know?
There's...
What I always like to say, I suppose, and this is going to be a little bit wishy-washy, but there's a tremendous amount of overlap, but also there's tremendous infighting.
The infighting happens on the level sometimes of theory and ideology, but more often on personalities, right?
When you describe to me Michael Flynn, Christian Nationalist, that's 1 through 10, Michael Flynn says, I'm not number 9, so that means I'm not a Christian Nationalist.
Other examples are not going to be so clear, which is why I'm hedging a bit about the thousands of people who are out there January the 6th.
You know, every single one.
And then, you know, again, it's the whole sort of, you see the parallel in the conspiracy world where it's like, you know, if you are wrong about one thing, they only need to be right, like, most of the time, right?
Like, mainstream journalists, commentators, experts, or whatever, if they're wrong once, then in the eyes of those people, like, they just, like, wail away at it.
You know what I mean?
I think it's more than just PR, though.
I think it's more just like, hey, let's have some sort of dedication to the truth and objectivity in a very broad sense.
And that's why I'm not going to be like, hey, all those people are Nazis.
I don't even...
I think that maybe some of those people didn't even know what they were up to, you know?
In terms of the differences between these things, in terms of Michael Flynn, I will call him a Christian nationalist even if he tells me he's not because I know his intent is bad.
You asked me this before we came on about how I know.
How do I know if the wife of Stuart Rhodes or Alex Jones Is accurately describing what their role was in those organizations, like in Oath Keepers or Infowars, right?
Yeah.
Okay, so look, it's pretty, I don't want to call it simple, but straightforward.
If there's specific sort of things, facts, like, hey, I met him on this date, blah, blah, blah.
All right, well, let's check that, things that are checkable.
When people have memories about things, and this is true in a completely different context for January the 6th, you know?
So, you know, one January the 6th guy was like, you know what?
I just walked in there.
You know, I was just protesting.
I was in there for like 10 minutes.
Now I can check that he was in there for 10 minutes, right?
His stated intent, should we take that with a grain of salt?
Yeah, possibly.
We can set that against, you know, what does the judge in the case say, right?
And in that particular case, the judge says, well, sorry, you're going to prison.
You were part of a rebellion against the United States, right?
Obstructing an official proceeding.
That's that.
Like, you can't really sort of pin down to that sort of degree of specificity, if you see what I mean.
I mean, you're saying that the results could be the same.
And again, that's like a completely...
In fact, that is like the actual danger, right?
It's not that a majority of the population is going to believe that voter fraud is just going to completely wipe out the election and then they're going to march.
on Washington and burn down the White House and then Donald Trump will be a dictator for life or whatever, right?
Like that doesn't happen, but that does happen when a lot of people who are in the area just sort of go along with it.
The reasonable people will just go along with it, is that when you tell me about Christian nationalists being different from evangelicals, right now Christian nationalists are ascendant, which means evangelicals will fly right alongside them.
When Christian nationalists are below the earth, wondering about how to get out from underneath their goblin holes, evangelicals are wonderful and lovely people.
And a lot of them, not a lot of them, but certainly several of them said what he has done in office is despicable and we hate January the 6th and whatnot.
Now, this is what I'm kind of interested in in regards to kind of this whole thing as a whole, is the idea of what I think is called or what I'm calling an accurate falsehood.
Something that is totally accurate and yet is 100% false.
Yeah.
There's one thing that Kelly Jones said that is why this kind of sparked in my mind and why I haven't been able to let go little kind of definition kinds of things the whole time, is Kelly said, we started at JFK assassination theories and then we wound up at January 6th or whatever it is.
And that is an accurate statement.
That is an accurate statement that could be said, right?
And the way it is said, though, in your book is it tells me, ah, here is the story of innocence lost.
It is a narrative being created out of that by itself, right?
They started at Waco to January 6th.
It is a lateral move.
Do you know what I'm saying?
It's not a fall from grace.
So to me, whenever I keep hearing people talk about the state of the United States, etc., etc., I 100% am delighted that people thought we were good.
But this is a lateral move from the birth of the country.
And I think that a lot of these people, particularly when...
It particularly sort of gets me when, you know, you hear all these sort of, like, the massive amount of stuff about so-called censorship, right?
Which is basically just people getting, like, shadow banned on Twitter or whatever.
I'm not saying that's a good thing.
There's, like, arguments for and against or whatever.
It's debatable.
But they have no idea what it's like in Uganda, you know?
Or, like, you know, the Democratic Republic of Congo where, like, you know, oh, yeah, you think that you're going to get thrown in jail for a tweet or whatever?
Let's go to India, where they just, like, shut the internet down.
They're just like, "Hey, in this state, we're just gonna shut the internet down today.
It's fine.
Okay, you want some censorship?
We can show you some censorship." And again, I'm not sort of trying to, like, minimize things to say that they're not, like, you know, they might not be doing something wrong or whatever, but it's...
You need to get some perspective, some of these people.
You know, of course, you know, there's thousands of people in Gaza who are being killed right now, right?
And this is just, you know, one child, right?
But there's kind of an assumption, I suppose, that like, hey, you know, this should be like safe or neutral territory or this kind of stuff shouldn't happen here.
Even from people, many of whom were in that crowd in the funeral who were immigrants, you know, from Gaza or from the West Bank or whatever.
In some ways, it's sort of like you think, well, that's...
Hopeful and I'm really glad that you think that you found safety.
Obviously, you didn't because you have this guy who allegedly murdered this small child.
I mean, the one thing that like, I guess like, you know, not living here for so long teaches you is that like you got to take every country on its own terms, you know.
Often when I look at American media, I don't really want to sort of give too many people a kicking here, but I just feel like some of the debates just sort of lack that perspective.