It's like when Stephanopoulos asked Ben Collins, the CEO of The Onion, who used to be the head censorship guy. MSNBC, who go around terrorizing other talk show hosts and other networks, getting them kicked off by going after sponsors. And Stephan Ovis says, Well, how can you not have an auction when the judge orders it? And how did you do this? That doesn't sound legal. He goes, It's Alex Jones. He goes, It's Alex Jones. And they got the head of Bloomberg's gun control group every town. He starts nodding his head. They're like, It's Alex Jones. I mean, we're allowed to do whatever we want to this guy.

But then starting about seven, eight years, nine years ago, they admit the Democrats write talking points daily that are given to his writers. They've got a deal.

CNN won't even return my publicist emails or MSNBC. So it's not like we don't reach out. I would like to be on everything. So, I just want to let you know that right leaning news is much more open to booking left leaning people than the Vice News.

Alex is reading a story about this from the American Free Press, which is a flagrantly anti-Semitic outlet founded by white supremacist Willis Cardo. The writer of the piece Alex is reading is Michael Collins Piper, who's the former editor for the Liberty Lobby and has a deep history of anti-Semitic slop.

Well, this was the argument with Trump for January 6th. And that's why the BBC edited his speech to make it look as if that's what he was saying.

But I think in terms of the ideology, the woke ideology, they got captured. They have a thing at the BBC called the LGBT desk, or they had it up until recently, which could veto any news story, which meant that any story that was slightly critical of transactivism or anything like that just didn't get reported. So I'm not surprised that the BBC gave them veto power?

Because they're fucking compromised. They're all compromised by the people that pay their advertising budget.

The amount of money that pharmaceutical drug companies spend on mainstream media is fucking preposterous.

They do it specifically because they don't want those media organizations to criticize any vaccines or any pharmaceutical drugs.

The Star and Tribune, probably being one of the worst papers in the United States, they suppress the truth and they magnify the lies and they magnify our lying politicians.

Sky News is the one that's weirdly pro-Republican American politics. Super right-wing.

Now this and the media trying to play it down.

And sexist against women back in the day, now, now it is a racist against, uh, white people and Asians and rate and sexist against men.

But if you look at the media coverage, the media, the media, the media treats him like he's super evil. It's pretty shocking. If you look at the amount of negative coverage, like one of the things that I looked at the other day was mainstream media coverage of you, Trump, a bunch of different public figures. And then 96% negative or something crazy.

The end of the classified ads. Yeah. They used to have to satisfy the people paying for ads. Now they have to satisfy their readers. And so the readers only want to hear one thing.

But the one solution to that, I think, is A, mainstream journalism has to change its way. You can't just be working as a propaganda arm for the Republican or the Democratic Party, which is what Fox News does and which is what MSNBC does. They stick within the lines, right?

Well, the top of the Democrat Party mouthpiece, the Drudge Report, has the headline: Make America Great Again, Divorce.

And the last thing I'll say on this, Will, is as we continue down this process, don't be surprised that we will see the very same playbook that has been used for a very long time in this country where those very bad actors and their friends in the legacy and mainstream propaganda media will accuse us of the very things that they are guilty of in order to try to deflect away from how they and their actions are undermining the Constitution, the rights and freedoms and civil liberties of the American people.

And they're paying, and the USAID and through NGOs is paying Reuters. Reuters and London to do hit pieces on conservatives across the United States.

They want to tell you. That he was a white supremacist. Yes. And not see his very Hispanic-looking face.

Jimmy is invested in making Trump out to be just another politician because that's an improvement in his image. Treating Trump like a threat to all our public safety makes him a pretty much unsellable candidate, which sucks for him. The whole brand is shitting on Democrats and pretending to attack them from the left, but with right-wing positions. So the thing that the Democrats are fighting can't possibly be something that you actually need to fight to. It has to just be an illusion, just another politician with big promises that doesn't do anything. With Trump, from most of Jimmy's audience, that's a comforting thought. With Harris and the Democrats, the audience fears that they would just be another normal politician. They would say the right things and inspire hope that things could be better and then just be another establishment hack. With Trump, the fear is that he's not. The fear is that he means what he's saying and will try to assert dictatorial type powers. By lombasting Trump as just another politician, Jimmy's actually doing amazing PR work for Trump among this kind of disaffected pretending to be left-wing audience.

So see the media spinning it for him at every level, carrying his water.

So Alex believes that the media has entirely turned against Biden and they're openly mocking him to his face by saying he's going to have a big boy press conference.

I read the Supreme Court ruling or scanned over it when it came out about an hour ago. And I wanted to make sure, and I called a couple constitutional lawyers who'd already read it, one of them Robert Barnes, and I just talked to each of the two lawyers I talked to about 60 seconds, and I said, am I correct the media is downplaying or not even covering the fact that they basically said Jack Smith's office was not created constitutionally, so the whole thing has to be thrown out? And they said, correct. And am I correct if they're whitewashing that the judge has been totally reversed and that Trump clearly did these acts, which weren't even criminal, in his presidential capacity, which he has total immunity in, and that only impeachment is the way to remove a president and then he can be charged? And he was never convicted. He only started the process in the two impeachments. The lawyers were like, yes, that's exactly right. So the corporate media is spinning it that this Obama-appointed globalist judge that's gone along with all this fraud who just got reversed, that it's in her hands.

I mean, the one thing that, like, I guess, like, you know, not living here for so long teaches you is that like you got to take every country on its own terms. You know, often when I look at American media, I don't really want to sort of give too many people a kicking here, but I just feel like some of the debates just sort of lack that perspective.

Stelter was definitely the mouth of the globalists for a bit.

I mean, the Atlantic Monthly, that's the mouthpiece of Sauron. The mouth of Satan came out two weeks ago and said...

And there's a couple things that really stuck out to me. One was they just have Trump liars on, and they just let them talk. I'm sorry? Yeah, I mean, they have, like, Jason Miller. Right, right, right. More or less, like, you know, he might as well be Trump campaign guy. Right, right. I think he is. Might as well be Stephen Miller, yeah. And he will just say trolly shit. And nonsense. And they just have to go along with it. It's a choice to interview him. And they make that choice. The news anchors are just like, wow. There's too much that he's saying that's full of shit that they can't even really deal with it. And he's saying it with a smirk. And it's like, okay, well, we don't have time to fact check you saying there's a migrant invasion of the country. And so this just stands on NBC News. And it's... It's irresponsible. I found this to be, like, this isn't news. This is, like, haphazard, like, presentation of dangerous material.

But it's almost to be expected because, you know, you want to have the image of fairness. Right. And so when one party is completely insane. Right. Being fair means broadcasting insane shit. Right, right, right. And that, I think, is a problem.

Alex isn't into that. He takes the unconfirmed numbers as concrete and then accuses the other media outlets of not covering the story. In reality, other U.S. mainstream media outlets covered this battle, and with the gift of hindsight, they were much more accurate.

And not only that, the rest of the media refuses to even cover the story. It's incredibly important for Alex to present the rest of the media as covering up all the truths that he relays to the audience, because those same media outlets often report out information that debunks his narratives. So nothing they say should be taken seriously.

So I want to roll some of this video. slavery still practiced across large areas of Africa, but because it's black-on-black slavery, the Western media will not cover it.

He's essentially arguing that this click within the mainstream alternative media is beholden to and makes excuses for Musk in a way that they wouldn't for other figures and didn't before Elon Musk bought Twitter.

Folks like Rogan do not treat Musk how they would treat someone else in his position. If the only thing Musk was doing was the brain chips and he wasn't Elon Musk and didn't own Twitter, they would never stop talking about how he was secretly trying to turn people into robots on behalf of Satan or the globalists. Leave alone all the stuff about the contracts with the Pentagon and shit like that. That would be endlessly assessed. David Icke is a madman, but he has rightly assessed that these people have a suspicious lapse in their inquisitiveness when it comes to Musk, and unfortunately, that's not something that's supposed to be called out. Musk gives these man figures access, and they don't want to jeopardize that access, being able to pile around with one of the richest men on Earth.

And to that point, I made the point on our last episode that I think Tucker is a willing participant in Putin-glorifying propaganda, and he's not being a useful idiot in this whole thing.

And the media basically covers it up.

And I remember when that guy drove from Illinois to shoot up the Republican baseball game close to you there in D.C. Wolf Blitzer said this guy was not a monster. He was angry.

But I really do think I give balanced coverage from my worldview. I honestly believe the things I say and I do.

And Alex, a lot of his coverage is in service of furthering that goal for Trump. And I find that to be pretty offensive and distasteful.

Whether it's the Washington Post or the New York Times or CNN, nauseating coverage, defending pedophilia and saying that There is no child kidnapping. There is no child trafficking. It does not exist.

If you've never been a candidate for president, the media hated more than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

NPR hasn't savaged anyone in their entire existence.

The media is anti-Christian.

by saying the things he's saying, Alex is 100% being a Russia apologist. He doesn't want people to think that he is, and he knows that once the fog of war clears, he doesn't want people to think that he's a Russian.

But see, the media doesn't show that because they're helping promote that idea that that's a good thing to happen or that whites deserve it.

Alex deprives his audience of being able to make an informed decision about people and events by only presenting a tailored version of reality curated to serve whatever the current narratives and needs are.

Folks, that's a big deal to have multiple national shows editing out Congress having a big round of applause when Bush says that the Patriot Act is set to repeal in 05.

I can say that the picture that's painted in the article is fair in as much as it reflects the texts, but it also doesn't include a ton of other context from texts. There's a selectiveness to what's being covered, which is always going to be an angle for possible criticism by someone like Alex when you're addressing his personal life. Case in point, the SPLC article, it says that Alex's wife mentions that they should get divorced six times in the text, which is true. But the texts also include Alex saying that multiple times himself. When you introduce the notion that she wanted a divorce at times, It comes an omission to not also mention that he did.

Alex desperately wants it to be real so it can help justify his hatred of immigrants. So as far as Infowars is concerned, it's definitely real. That's the level of rigor that he brings to the table and why people should trust him as a good source of information.

I'm not saying that they did, but it felt so in sync, this idea of like this media rush over the 78 specific outlets that influence. Meanwhile... So there's a coordinated message, I think that's what you said. Yeah. Meanwhile, There's the same amount of kids getting killed in Chicago every week, but there's no coordinated message about that.