So the thing that's going on here is I hate to say this because I obviously can't prove this, but the sense that I get is a pay-to-play kind of situation. I kind of feel like David Icke might be paying for airtime. And Alex is profiting off this. Because there is a trend that goes through the interview where Alex is just letting David Icke say all this stuff. Chiming in very sporadically. Not interrupting him all that much. And then, after a couple segments, Alex is like, for my own selfish reasons, I want to talk about what I want to talk about. This is one example of it. What they don't want people to know... Is there's no virus, because then the house of cards completely comes down. And if I know that, then they know that, and therefore the jails, if not the hospitals, the jails should be full of these people if there's any justice. All right, David, we've just spent three, four segments, and you've had a lot of great points hitting your main topic. What about... 400,000 signatures will pass the number they need at WhiteHouse.gov to investigate Bill and Melinda Gates. I don't know if that proves anything, but there is a real feeling of like, all right, you've had your time now. Now help me out with my shit. Right. I could see that. That could also just be an arrangement between the two of them because like, hey, what's going to work best for both of us? Sure. I don't know. It's very weird. There's a dynamic at play that is not organic and is not normal. And I think that might be a part of why Alex is so happy to be like, that makes total sense. You're right. There is no virus. You have to have a fake virus if you want to control it. It's because he's basically in an agreement of some sort to platform David Icke's ideas.