Today, Dan and Jordan sit down to discuss an episode of the Alex Jones Show where Alex makes it super clear he's on Russia's side regarding Ukraine. Also, Alex makes up a bunch of stuff about the Canadian convoy situation, and prostrates himself in front of David Icke. Citations
I realized I was playing it, and I hadn't played the original in, like, forever.
And I was playing it, and I got back into the thing that I love the most about playing that game, which is basically creating a series of Rube Goldberg machines to get one machine to trip into a trap and then knock down, like, 30 different ones.
And, you know, we've seen this repeatedly in recent days.
Like, Alex is offering analysis of the situation in Ukraine that's over the top, but, like, he claims that Russia's the victim, but there's an attack on Russian-held areas in a sovereign country.
No, if somebody were to attack New Orleans, France would, of course, be like, how dare you attack our French-held territory in the United States, right?
I honestly don't think Alex's position is something he can seriously argue, because essentially no one in the international community formally recognizes areas like Crimea or the Donbass region as being legitimately part of Russian territory.
He's calling these Russian-held territories, and for him to say those words, he has to understand that they're holding them without the right to do so.
Also, I want to point out that Alex is trying to soft-sell the idea that these areas are rightfully Russia's territory because he says that the population in these areas are like 98% Russian.
The argument here is that the people are essentially Russian, so really the sovereign border of Ukraine is what's wrong here.
I was legitimately thinking in my head, this is exactly like, what if there's a massive number of Mexicans who lived in Texas and they just said, well, Texas is ours now.
What's going on here is that Alex is misremembering one of his talking points from 2014 when he was arguing why it was maybe okay for Russia to annex Crimea.
That peninsula is 58.3% Russian and 24.3% Ukrainian, so when the annexation was happening, the pro-Russia talking point was that Crimea was basically Russian, so they should be able to claim the territory.
Alex is conflating this argument with the statistics that were thrown around regarding the status of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, which is back in 2008, the Georgian territories that Russia believes are theirs.
Both are within Georgia's recognized borders, but South Ossetia's population is only about 7% Georgian, with most of the rest being Ossetians.
Similarly, the population of Abkhazia is over half Abkhazian, with a minority being ethnic Georgians.
Because these regions had these demographic profiles, folks like Alex argued that they weren't really part of Georgia, and if they wanted to be part of Russia, they should be!
That was part of the talking points justifying things in 2008.
Alex doesn't actually know what's going on in the world right now, but he knows that he's invested in creating narratives for why his audience should see Russia as the good party in this conflict in opposition to the evil globalists.
And it shows in the way he's just recycling talking points that weren't accurate to begin with and wouldn't even be relevant to the current situation, even if they were.
Another thing that's important to bring up here is the numbers of Russian people compared to Ukrainian people in the Donbass region.
It's pretty difficult to assess, partially because of intentional actions taken by Putin.
The government of Russia has carried out a policy of passportization as it relates to the residents of Donbass, whereby they issue passports to people en masse.
This is a couple of particularly dicey side effects.
Probably the chief among them is that it allows Russia to artificially inflate the number of citizens they have in the region.
And the protection of those citizens would likely be a major piece of any argument that was made if they want to occupy or annex.
The real world situation is complicated, and I'd be lying if I said that I understood everything that's going on, or even most of it, but what I can tell you with absolute certainty is that Alex is completely winging this coverage and making shit up based on things he remembers saying in past shows when he was rationalizing Russia's actions against their neighbors.
It's just, the fingerprint is there, it's very clear.
And so any conflict like what's going on in Ukraine, any kind of possible conflict, is a tension between Alex's enemies and, on the other hand, Russia, who are against Alex's enemies.
To watch the globalists launch these attacks and launch, obviously, their own false flags on that kindergarten so that they can have the pretext for this, and now here we are.
And Hillary Clinton, the people, the representative, are basically president now.
It's a roundtable of the Clinton crime syndicate and Obama's crime syndicate and Soros' crime syndicate that are all interlocked that are putting the world under biomedical martial law.
And now preparing to launch a full-scale war with Russia.
So here's what I'm supposed to believe, according to Alex.
I'm supposed to believe that a combination of Hillary, Obama, and Soros' individual crime syndicates have come together and they're in charge of the country and they're launching a war on Russia that's going to spiral out of control into a world war that'll probably be nuclear in nature, but they can't take out Alex.
Like, he's supposed to be the most dangerous guy in the world to them because he has their number and they've tried to recruit him because he's so damn good.
But they're just gonna let him live when they have the ability and willingness to take actions that'll cause the deaths of millions or billions of people?
That seems fucking dumb.
And honestly, they could kill Alex so easily.
He's so unhealthy that any kind of heart attack or stroke, no one would be suspicious of it.
Anyway, also, Alex has no evidence that the bombing he's discussing here was a false flag, that kindergarten.
This was a kindergarten in the Luhansk region in Ukraine, which was shelled reportedly by pro-Russian separatists attacking from the east, according to Ukrainian soldiers who said that they did not return fire.
Russia put out a statement claiming that the Ukrainians staged the whole thing, which is the talking point that Alex is now parroting.
We are now in a position where folks like Boris Johnson are saying these acts are false flags being done by the Russians, and folks like Alex saying it's a false flag being done to the Russians, and there's no way to move forward from here.
Once Biden came out before a false flag or attack at all happened and said, we think they're going to do a false flag, at that moment, reality ceased to matter.
I kind of agree with you, but I do think that there's one stipulation that I would make, and that is that there is a possibility that there was intelligence, that there was going to be a false flag.
Yeah, I mean, from my understanding of how that would go, in order for Biden to come out and say, with the backing of the intelligence community, we know they're going to do a false flag, that essentially has to mean either we know that the Russians have been communicating that a false flag attack is going to happen, so we're telling them we can hear them, or it is we're making this bullshit up.
And so we're telling them that we're lying about this stuff, but they can't say out loud that we're lying about it because it's going to look like they're lying about it.
Once we get into a situation where now we're in an infinite loop of, well, if I do this, it's going to look like they do this, and I do this, and they look like this.
Alex's language is really bad there, because it makes it sound like the guy's son got arrested, but it was actually just Artur Pawlowski who got arrested.
So Alex is covering what appears to be a large story here, but you've got to really look at the details he's offering, and you can put together the pieces and understand what he's talking about.
So here are the essential elements of the story.
One, people are being arrested, not in Ottawa.
Two, people are being held without bail.
And three, Artur Palowski has been arrested, and there's some mention of his son.
The way Alex wants you to hear this story is that there are massive numbers of arrests for no reason happening to people who are all over Canada who are then being denied bail.
That's the impression he's sending.
In reality, this is just about one person, Artur Palowski, and an article about him Alex has read on Rebel Media.
It had just come out on February 16th that Pawlowski had been denied bail in relation to his recent arrest that took place in Couts, Alberta, away from the Ottawa situation.
Pawlowski's son had provided information on the situation to Ezra Levant, who then reported on it in Rebel.
The second lie is that he was arrested for praying with the truckers.
That's absolutely not true.
Early in February, an agreement had been struck between the lawyers for the truck blockade and the RCMP that would allow for a couple lanes of traffic to be open that would allow some flow of goods over the border.
Days later, Palowski was recorded on video giving a speech at a place called the Smuggler's Saloon where he was passionately arguing that the protesters should go back on their deal and that they needed to be willing to sacrifice their lives for the cause of, I guess, getting rid of public health measures.
This constitutes incitement, and he was inciting the protesters to go against an agreement they'd already made with the police, so he got arrested.
Ultimately, the fact that he keeps going around wherever he stands to get a bunch of attention and desperately tries to get arrested, that fact made the court decide that he stood a really strong chance of re-offending if he was released, so he was denied bail.
The judge also decided that his defense could not assert free speech grounds since Canada's charter doesn't protect free speech that would incite other people to commit criminal activity.
Incidentally, the Couch Border Crossing was where the RCMP uncovered a large cache of weapons, and a little while after Pulaski gave his impassioned speech to never give up and called the blockade their Alamo, four of the people arrested at the blockade were charged with conspiracy to murder RCMP members.
So there's a bit of a movement happening where things like domestic terror attacks are starting to seem a little bit more likely, particularly as the blockades are cleared and the protest breaks up in Ottawa, and nothing's really been achieved.
Folks like Pawlowski and Rebel Media have riled people up and made a shit ton of money doing it, and when nothing comes of it, there's going to be a whole lot of really jaded people who might start to think that their last allegedly peaceful solution has been a failure, and they might get...
Black-pilled, as they say.
And the potential of that is pretty worrying.
You can see here in this case study a great example of how Alex lies to build narratives.
The actual story is just one guy who got arrested for inciting people to violate an agreement that they'd made with the police who was denied bail because of a documented pattern of behavior.
Alex reports that as people getting arrested all over Canada, not being told why they're getting arrested because of the emergency act and then being denied bail.
Yeah, but at the very least, it is aimed at getting people who are already notoriously violent and on a knife's edge to, oh, no, no, no, this is terrifying.
What appears to be several thousand, if you look at all the videos, masked.
Men with black ski masks in police uniforms are massing, and they have already started the arrest of the leaders of the Trucker Freedom Convoy, and they are not charging them and saying they're being held without bail.
You can find plenty of images of police not wearing masks or just wearing COVID masks.
This is just part of Alex's branding of his enemy forces, but it's also important to remember that even if everything Alex is saying there were true, that would still not be martial law.
The organizers who were arrested have been charged.
Tamara Lick was charged with counseling to commit mischief, and she's still awaiting a bail hearing as of the preparation of this episode.
She may get bail.
She's not been denied it yet, that's for sure.
Chris Barber is another one of the organizers who got arrested, but he was already released on bail by Friday, the same day as Alex's episode that we're listening to.
Barber was charged with counseling to commit mischief, counseling to disobey a court order, So he has been charged.
It is a little bit weird how hard the American far right is...
Really pushing this, I guess, assault on Canada's sovereignty as a nation.
Boy, aren't they.
I mean, isn't it weird?
If another country had done this type of shit, like if the situations were reversed, right?
And half of Canada's parliament is like, hey, y 'all better go down to fucking America and really kill those guys as much as you can because their government's evil.
Wouldn't America do like sanctions or some shit?
Like, can't Trudeau be like, hey, guess what?
Tucker Carlson, if you come into my country again, you're dead!
The Polish immigrant preacher, popular preacher, who went and prayed with the convoy, has been arrested, and they are not even charging him, and they're saying that he's being held without bail.
And that is also in the news for the other individuals who've been arrested in Ottawa.
They're saying we will not say where they are, what happened to them.
This is martial law.
They're clearly trying to start a shooting war, ladies and gentlemen, and they're trying to put people in a corner where folks have no other choice.
We do not need to go out and start a shooting war at this point.
That's a really interesting perspective because you really have to ask yourself what Alex is trying to do here.
He's lying about the situation that all these convoy organizers and Pawlowski are in in order to frame it as some kind of a martial law scenario.
His explanation for why the government is due But I don't believe that.
If Alex were truly opposed to the triggering of a shooting war, then he would want to report the information about the protests and the arrests as accurately as possible.
Sensationalizing things only will lead people to drawing inaccurate conclusions and possibly taking impulsive emotional actions based on those inaccurate conclusions that they reach.
The only reason you would lie like this with these dramatized details specifically tailored to tug on the very specific fears and paranoias that you've built in your audience is to make that kind of impulsive action more likely.
The fingerprints of Alex's intentions are really visible in his actions here.
He wants to escalate the situation while also creating the sort of hopelessness in the audience about any peaceful solutions to the problems that they face.
His actions really don't make sense in terms of any other context that I can think of.
I would say if my favorite guy was in the middle of saying, hey, you guys better stop attacking Ukraine, otherwise we're going to have to save everybody's life in Ukraine.
And everybody's like, no.
Nobody's doing that.
Please don't do that.
And he's like, you guys are just trying to make us go into Ukraine and save everybody's life in Ukraine.
So Alex is just lying about the Ottawa chief of police resigning.
That's what he's talking about, the police mass resigning or whatever.
Peter slowly resigned, not because he was so offended by the idea of arresting these protesters, but because he was catching very severe criticism for letting the situation deteriorate to the point that it did.
Alex has no evidence that special units of police were brought in wearing black ski masks and he has no proof to defend his claim that tons of police are resigning.
That's just a lie he built on the foundation of the police chief's resignation.
As for the tow truck drivers thing, that's just made up too.
You can find video of police towing the trucks out and there aren't tow truck drivers forming a mutiny or anything.
It's a fun dramatic image I am Spartacus!
I am truck driver.
So, Newsweek had an interview with the CEO of Alliance Towing, Ibrahim Masir, who said that he didn't want to get involved, but was very clear that his comments should, quote, not be interpreted to be for or against the trucker's protest.
His concerns seemed to mostly be a logistical one.
Quote, my employees are not trained to work in that kind of an environment.
The liability issues associated with that situation are just too great.
Newsweek reached out to a bunch more companies and they all had no comment.
Global News spoke to Mark Graves, the president of the Provincial Towing Association of Ontario, who said that one of their sticking points was that the, quote, government needs to first show it will protect the industry from threats to safety and business.
Yeah.
I feel like many of the companies were concerned about possible retaliation from convoy protesters if they were to participate in the removing of the trucks.
Yeah.
definitely forecasts of snow.
That is a piece of it.
But the other issue was that the towing companies had been receiving death threats.
Don Gatchel, the president of the Towing and Recovery Association of Alberta, told Global News, quote, I can confirm that three of our members had received threatening phone calls and emails.
One company was threatened just because their trucks were seen near the blockade in Coutts.
So, as it relates to the tow truck companies, it's less that they're joining in with the protesters as it is that they're afraid of terrorist threats that the protesters are making.
So I have no idea where Alex is getting this information from, but I do not think it's accurate.
For what it's worth, much like posturing with nuclear weapons, making accusations about genocide is another one of Putin's very consistent strategies when it comes to navigating the lead-up to hostilities.
Now, to be fair, these kind of allegations are very serious, and I don't think should be thrown around, and I don't want to minimize them, but this is something that he does a lot.
He recently claimed that what was going on in Donbass looked a lot like the genocide of Russians.
In 2014, before annex in Crimea, he said that Russians were being the subject of ethnic cleansing there.
In 2008, Medvedev was president, but he too claimed that Russians were being ethnically cleansed in Georgia prior to launching a war against them.
One of the key justifications that Putin and the Russian government gives for taking hostile action against neighboring states is that they have an obligation to protect Russians who live there who are under attack.
The evidence that they're specifically under attack is never really provided and then an attack takes place allegedly to protect Russians in the region.
In reality, it's actually Russia who generally is engaged in these acts of ethnic cleansing.
In 2008, they rounded up Georgians in South Ossetia and tortured them, killed them, and burned their homes.
In the annexation of Crimea, Russia has targeted Crimean Tatars and attempted to reduce their numbers in the country.
Honestly, this is a sick shit, and Alex is so blinded by his own imaginary fight against these enemies that he's made up that he's buying into war propaganda put out by a really dangerous power just because he's decided to believe that they...
And not only that, he uses his pretend expertise on geopolitics to convince his audience that they should support this stuff, too.
It's gross.
Like I said, this is really, like, the topic is very serious.
It's a laziness, too, on Alex's part to not recognize the historical trends, at least over the last 20 years, 15 years, of These lead-ups to attempts to invade areas in neighboring countries, what's preceded them has been largely the same.
Especially since a few months ago, well, for the past several years, Putin has been like, hey, if NATO expands, I'm going to be very aggressive.
And then NATO is expanding, or it's appearing to, and he's being very aggressive.
Now, to believe, however, somehow, that in the intervening short stretch of time, Ukraine was like, now's our chance to get these ten guys, that would be a little bit ridiculous.
But, yeah, and you have to kind of even see potential strategic reasons for invading areas like the Donbass or retaining them as...
Russian-held territories with separatist Russian-backed groups in them because that is a check on Ukraine joining NATO, as has been pointed out by Putin himself, more or less.
You know, it's...
Alex has fallen for some shit here.
And this isn't to say that the United States is all above board in terms of their actions in this circumstance.
30-plus years ago, before I was even on air, reading Patriot publications like the New American from the John Burt Society and actually going to the library and getting the books that they were quoting by Zbigniew Brzezinski, by people like Carol Quigley, like people like Cecil Rhodes, and...
Because if Alex is to be believed here, then essentially all of his conspiracy theories and all of his supposed knowledge of the world is rooted in the John Birch Society.
guarantee 100% he never read those books.
He has absolutely no ability to discuss what they're about beyond pre-packaged talking points That is true.
Simply put, there's an argument to be made that Alex's entire career has been one long, occasionally entertaining charade where a guy pretends to know stuff but really, he's just yelling about stuff he read in his dad's red-baiting magazines.
Honestly, this makes sense, and it's what we've kind of suspected and known.
The New American is painfully written in a deeply bigoted extreme right-wing publication, and Alex is probably reading it on a regular basis at a time before his brain matured to a point where he could assess the information on the pages.
Reading over some of the article titles from their issues from, like, 1994 basically reads like a call sheet for all of Alex's early narratives.
So one of the things that's important to understand, too, is that the John Birch Society and their publications largely treated the civil rights movement as a communist conspiracy.
They treated the push to end apartheid in South Africa and Rhodesia as communist conspiracies.
They treat any instance of people who aren't white men demanding rights as a communist conspiracy.
This is the intellectual tradition that Alex filters the world through.
It's not racism, it's just they don't like communism.
And he worked with the communists in the Spanish Civil War before that, but it took him 20 years of working with the communists to get to the highest levels and to learn British intelligence was funding Stalin.
If the U.S. Army was funding Stalin, even before World War II, just like McCarthy found out about it.
We've traveled through 20-odd years of his past at this point, and I have yet to hear him say, Klaus Schwab is also the originator behind all of this, next to Bill Gates and Rothschilds.
So this is how Alex reports the news, but what actually happened is that Biden came out and said that he was convinced that Putin had decided to invade Ukraine.
He never said that he was reiterating that the U.S. was going to attack Russia, and in fact...
how we're not going to do that.
On Friday, he even said, quote, make no mistake.
If Russia pursues its plans, it will be responsible for a catastrophic and needless war of choice.
The United States and our allies are prepared to defend every inch of NATO territory from any threat to our collective security as well.
We also will not send troops to fight in Ukraine, but we will continue to support the Ukrainian people.
He was literally saying the opposite of what Alex is reporting and just said that he would impose sanctions if Russia decided to invade.
The reason that there's a disconnect here is likely because Alex is getting all of his information from really disreputable pro-Putin outlets that share his outlook on the world.
For 85 years, they got to rape the children and put people in gulags and rape your wives and torture.
Now they, oh, Canada's there now.
They brought in their special police.
You know their UN.
The UN, everywhere they go, rape and murder.
The C-130s land in any country, including Europe.
They load those women and children on who've never seen again.
They go into the hungry arms of Klaus Schwab.
That's who they are?
They see us as lower than worms.
We are meat on the table to them.
They devour us because we will not see them for the monsters they are.
We will not find God again and pray for guidance and say, I will not be your slave.
I will not submit to you.
And because we will not wake up to the fact that they are evil, because we won't take the black pill and realize that things are bad and we got to stop it.
So, the red pill is a term that gets thrown around and has connotations about awakening and realizing something new about the world around you.
Conversely, the black pill is fucking nihilism.
It's a term that has a specific meaning, and, you know, that is that the world is too screwed to be saved or changed.
And it was particularly popular among incel communities.
Taking the black pill for them meant realizing that there's no chance of their circumstances changing and that they were hopeless, which had the effect of leading some to commit acts of mass murder.
In the political context, taking the black pill is a route to domestic terrorism.
That's...
What is being promoted.
Also, a lot of that rant there, like especially the meat on the table stuff that Alex is doing, that's just him referencing the fake document Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars.
It was a hoax document that Bill Cooper published in Behold a Pale Horse and Alex thinks it's real.
Anyway, this is some bad stuff and the sort of mentalities that Alex is encouraging in his audience is a really dangerous kind of combination of stuff.
So this is a direct contradiction of so many narratives about immigration that Alex has spread over the years.
If you're one of his listeners and you hear that, that Mexico does its own thing and isn't involved with the globalists, that should be a cold splash of water across your face that Alex is making everything up.
Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has been vaccinated and boosted, although he has been skeptical of lockdown measures taken by other countries that he has seen as being fairly excessive.
That is a fair point.
He's also gotten COVID twice, so maybe some measures might be wise.
I can find no evidence that he said those things about the Great Reset or Build Back Better, which I don't even think are things that Alex could define at this point.
So Christia Friedland is the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada, and she started to become a bit of a target for the truck convoy supporters.
So now Alex has learned who she is and is getting in on the act of attacking her.
You can kind of see how Alex is half-remembering something and trying to smear Friedland, but he can't quite remember what he's supposed to be mad about.
So Friedland's father, Donald Friedland, Are you sure?
Her mother was named Halyana Freeland and she was actually born in Bavaria, Germany.
She was born in 1946, though, so I don't think she was involved in Hitler's war effort.
Her father, Mikhailo Chomiak, was the editor-in-chief of an anti-Semitic publication called Krakow News.
That was distributed around Nazi-occupied territory.
So one of the things that's really interesting about this story is that it seems like Chomiak's descendants have done a lot of wrestling with what this guy did.
For instance, Freeland's uncle, history professor John Paul Himka, has written published articles about his father-in-law's connection with the paper, and Freeland is even credited as assisting in one of them.
A person isn't inherently responsible for the things that their parents or grandparents did, particularly when they make an effort to learn from that history.
I don't feel like the grandchildren of Nazis need to be condemned for the actions of their grandparents unless they're Nazis themselves, which is scant evidence to suggest Freeland is.
And it's just amazing under the civil emergency to hold your father.
Until March 11th, without bail, without bond, for thought crime.
And we aired his speech here on the show back when he gave it to the truckers about following their conscience and standing up for what's right.
And when we saw black people with white people and others say no to being told they had to sit at the back of a bus or know that they couldn't go into a restaurant and order food, they had to go to the back window and get it out.
Now we're told, unvaccinated, you've got to go to the back window.
It's the same crap again.
And, oh, you can't come in the restaurant.
Or, oh, you can't be on the bus.
Period.
It's wrong.
And it's particularly black folks around the U.S. that see that.
They're the main group getting arrested in places like L.A. and New York.
In fact, over 90% of those getting arrested are black, refusing to take the damn shot.
You can hand-wave away all this by reminding Alex that his intellectual tradition that he belongs to and all of his heroes were the ones fighting super aggressively to allow businesses to continue forcing black people to get food from those back windows.
His heroes in the John Birch Society and people like Gary Allen wrote articles and pamphlets about how the sit-ins at lunch counters were a nefarious communist conspiracy meant to overthrow the country so Alex could just calm the fuck down with his lionizing of the civil rights movement and its victories.
If he'd been around back then, he would have been bullhorning sit-ins about how they're funded by the Rothschilds or some shit.
On a larger level, the situation with the unvaccinated has literally no similarity to the treatment of black people in America.
The suggestion is offensive on its face, and it's an indication only of Alex's racist brain and his desire to aggrandize his own imagined suffering while minimizing the legitimate struggle.
faced by people who don't look like him.
Yep.
unidentified
I would encourage him to provide literally any examples of people who've been arrested for not getting vaccinated.
And then after that, he can demonstrate how a majority of them are black.
As far as I know and can tell, no one has been arrested for not getting vaccinated.
Some people have been arrested for refusing to leave places that require vaccination after they've been asked to leave.
But Alex should be in favor of that since those businesses and their owners should have the right of free association to serve whichever customers they want.
If you'll recall, Alex was super in favor of that bakery not making a gay couple a wedding cake.
Right.
unidentified
There have been some people who've also been arrested for having or distributing fake vaccination cards, which is just forgery of official documents.
So the courts in Canada are not presuming Pawlowski guilty of the offense that he was arrested for.
They used his past pattern of behavior to decide that he was a person with a high likelihood, almost a certainty, of re-offending if released, so he's denied bail.
The only reason we're still live on air and the only reason we are millions and millions of unstoppable watts just in AM and FM and shortwave stations around the world is because of you.
What have I told you?
World government's making its move.
Not out of strength, but out of weakness.
And now that the thermonuclear war clock is two minutes to midnight, David Icke, the most prolific individual, the trailblazer, the most accurate person.
I get the sense that Alex is doing this in order to create the false appearance that he and David Icke were on the same page early on, since that kind of lends a bit of false credibility to the idea that they were both predicting what is happening in the world today.
You're on a unified front early on, whatever.
That's absolutely not true, and anyone who spent even a little bit of time engaging with their material knows that.
You know the thing that's absolutely pathetic about this is the very clear power imbalance that is totally clear but entirely unspoken.
changed his core branding, but the same isn't true for Alex.
Alex hated David Icke early in his career, but now has had to adopt pretty much all of Icke's worldview in order to keep up with the rapidly escalating insanity in the conspiracy community.
David Icke was the turd in the punch bowl with his interdimensional lizard beings back in the day when Alex was the real shit talking about the banks and the UN.
Alex was always no better than David Icke.
It's just now he realizes he's not capable of maintaining a brand where he tries to pretend that he is.
Meanwhile, David Icke is as crazy as he's ever been, and his brand is entirely able to take or leave Alex.
And he was a famous person prior to that in England.
When he went on TV and said he was the son of God, it was...
Ridiculously huge.
You know, so coming from that kind of an inciting incident into this career in, like, Lizards Walk Among Us, there's a built-in thing that will allow you to have, like, fuck-off kind of money in your brand.
Yeah, I don't know exactly what it is, but there's something that I think he has a problem.
Also, if Alex thinks that David Icke is right all along, unfortunately, that's basically him saying that he believes the protocols of the elders of Zion are real, because David Icke has pushed that quite a bit.
This isn't a legitimate power of the people situation.
Like, if anything, the protests prove that a relatively small number of people who act strategically can unsuccessfully attempt to force their will on a much larger population who doesn't support them if they're willing to take extreme measures, and the outcome of it will be annoying a ton of people and wasting everyone's time for a while.
So Alex and David want tons of people to show up and are presenting that it's the solution to world tyranny because they're disappointed that the protests are getting cleared without any real major incident happening that they can profit from exploiting.
Alex didn't get that false flag car bomb that he was hoping for, so he's having to try to do the best he can with the completely false and pretty underwhelming narrative about organizers getting arrested without charges.
That's not exciting, and also, if anyone takes the time to look into it, they'd just see that Alex is making it up.
The answer to this propaganda narrative dead end that they're facing is the prospect of adding more fuel to the fire in the form of tons of people showing up energized and convinced that stopping the clearing of the protests is the solution to world tyranny being established.
That would have a high probability of causing some kind of a flare-up, which is what these dudes want.
This isn't gonna happen because I doubt there are millions of people in Canada that support the protests.
A poll came out on the 14th showing that 72% of Canadians wanted the protesters to, quote, go home now.
44% said that the protests, quote, made them more inclined to support measures like indoor masking and showing proof of vaccination at the Canada-US border.
So, in some sense, you could look at the protests as being counterproductive.
Like, maybe they backfired.
I don't know.
Certainly didn't achieve whatever goals they wanted to, unless the goals were enrichment of some really shitty grifters and getting a ton of attention for some shady folks.
Yeah, I mean, I think we're missing out on another huge, crucial aspect of this, is that this is all happening where it can't really affect Alex or David at all.
So they get to get the pride and power of saying, you guys go shut down this whole place with knowing that nothing bad will happen to them.
I mean, the only real possibility is if those blockades lasted long enough to have a severe impact on goods and services flow, and it did disrupt the supply chain in some way, or if
I've said so many times, what is coming, what is planned, is far, far, far worse and more extreme than anything you can imagine in terms of the consequences of standing up now.
When people say, "Oh yeah, but what are the consequences for me of doing this?" Well, I can tell you, the consequences of not doing it are enormously greater.
For one thing, I think it's built on the bedrock of something that is obviously a trite but true point, which is fear is not really a productive state of mind to be in.
And trying to combat fears is always usually a positive exercise.
That said, the situation in Canada and the situation in Ukraine are not just to make David Icke scared.
I understand this impulse on the part of conspiracy theorists to be like, everybody's just trying to make you scared in order to keep you controlled and what have you.
And fine, but also the things that are happening in the world are real.
And to not...
Deal with that seems escapist in some ways.
And I would flip it around on them.
If this is like, you know, the globalists are just trying to make you scared about these situations, what are you doing?
So we know what the outcomes plan to be, total global control and the end of countries and the connection of the human brain body to AI and all of that.
So that has not gone away.
That's the goal.
How they get there is they'll have a plan, but they're going to have to change it here and there.
He's basically saying that he's created an imagined end state that he sees things going towards, and his plan is to take everything that happens in the world and find ways to explain every event as being part of the plan advancing towards that end state.
That's actually pretty smart in terms of how to be a really lazy prophet because you aren't committing to any specific things happening and thus you're not really ever at risk of people saying you're wrong unless your end state fails to ever come into being.
But you can always say that the villains are still working towards that end state and their plans are behind.
Maybe like 10 years behind as we've heard Alex say so much.
If you've bought into David Icke's shit, you might hear what he's saying as a reasonable response, but to me, that sounds like a clear admission that David Icke just makes stuff up as he's going along.
He sees world events and incorporates them into the larger narrative that he has about the world, fudging details if he has to, oversimplifying things when necessary, and then just outright ignoring tons of stuff that he can't make fit the mold.
The only real question for me is whether he's aware of what he's doing, and he's a conscious con man in this, or if he's just mentally unwell to the point where this is an unconscious process and how he actually experiences the world.
I'm not sure, but I think it's really, really telling.
Like, what's next?
Ah, let me tell you.
I know the end point, and I will figure it out along the way.
Well, they're doing it in a way that seeks to keep the levels of people dying, certainly in this earlier period, to a level, catastrophic as it is, where they can kind of keep some kind of lid on it as best they can.
And to do that, enormous numbers of these vials...
They sent out saline solution for most of the vaccines, which is the explanation for why it's not killing everybody in the way that I have already said my endpoint is.
By the way, David, I've got to interrupt you and give you credit.
I remember you six, eight months ago or so saying, Most of this is saline.
They're only targeting old people and military and certain groups with it.
And then now they had major top scientists go off the government's own data and show that they're actually targeting conservative and nationalist and awake sectors with the poison shots.
They actually were able to map it out.
Gregory said a report on it showing it.
So what you said 8, 9, 10 months ago, I forget it was a long time ago, actually came true.
So I watched that Greg Reese video when he put it out last month, and honestly, it was so dumb that I didn't even take the time to engage with it.
I guess now that Alex is bringing it up to defend some dumb shit that David Icke is saying, I'll talk about it a little.
In January, Reese put out a video titled, Evidence that U.S. Government Targeted Red States with Deadly Batches of Vaccine.
This report was based on a website that a guy named Craig Particooper threw together called, How Bad Is My Batch?
This site purports to show how many deaths and side effects are associated with each batch of the vaccines listed by batch number.
That information was then taken and interpreted to show that the most deadly and side effect riddled batches were being sent to red states.
This data is all entirely pulled from VAERS data, so it's not even confirmed that these adverse events happened, and the data isn't meant to be used that way, so right off the bat you can't reach any of the conclusions that Greg Reese's video does from this data set.
Already, this is stupid.
But, it gets even more idiotic when you realize what VAERS data is.
It's self-reporting of side effects that may or may not be real.
All this data would actually be showing is that in red states, there are higher incidents of self-reporting of side effects that may or may not be real, and if they are real, may or may not be related to the vaccine at all.
That kind of makes sense to me, given how largely anti-vax the conservative community has become in the last few years.
I could see them having a greater tendency to over-report possible side effects to VAERS or for some people to actually be inclined to file false reports.
That data could then be used by someone like Parda Cooper and then Greg Reese and then Alex and David Icke to argue that vaccines are deadly and they're being sent to conservative areas while the rest of the world and the country gets placebos.
And this is a rebuttal that even just takes for granted the data Pardecouper extracted from VAERS being accurate in its presentation.
I'm just deciding to stipulate that it is because I don't care whether it's accurate or not.
It actually makes no difference in terms of the conclusions.
It's a ridiculous thing that has potential other explanations.
Even if what's being presented as data is accurate.
I'm starting to feel like our show is like the Black Mirror version of Schoolhouse Rock.
Like, when you hear that song about how I'm just a bill, and you see it go from nothing into law, and you're like, I feel like I've learned something about the process here.
Learning about the process of bullshit is really what's going on.
So this is a truly insane website, complete with suggestions of how to cure yourself of the vaccine, and Alex is able to use it to push his dumb conspiracies, and a key element of this is the laundering process.
Here we go, Schoolhouse Rock theme song.
This is just a misuse of VAERS data at its core.
It's meaningless on its own, but it gets misrepresented and misinterpreted on this website, and it starts to take a little bit of a shape.
But...
This website is still pretty inaccessible to most people.
If you're not already on board with the conspiracy shit, you're gonna see that, and you're not gonna be swayed.
It's gonna be like, eh, alright, whatever.
So Greg Reese comes in, and he makes a slick video packaging the claims of this website in a form that has the ability to scare and intrigue people.
This video is also something that Alex can use, because the site itself is too formless for Alex to really get a grasp on.
There's no holds for him to grab onto.
He needs concise talking points, as opposed to a sprawling website full of insane nonsense.
Reese's video provides him with those talking points, and he can go forward from there.
Also, let's be clear.
What David Icke was saying eight months ago wasn't that the vaccine wasn't real.
He was saying that COVID didn't exist.
There was no virus, and maybe viruses don't exist.
That was his take back then, but I guess Alex doesn't want to get into that, lest he have to choose between agreeing with that or bringing up something that David Icke said that looks really fucking stupid.
It's literally like you've got this raw material that then gets refined and refined and refined and refined until you have the diamond of bullshit that Alex gets to say.
I love the idea that Alex is comparing himself to a family member who has cancer who's just gone one day.
He hasn't been yelling about how everyone could be his last show for the last year.
He's like a family member who yells at you constantly about how they're about to die, then tries to sell you something you don't need in order to keep them alive, and also it turns out their life-threatening condition that they have is a cut they gave themselves while trying to stab a random person on the street.
They did it to themselves.
They're not really dying.
Nope.
I'm trying to sell you things to keep them alive.
It's such bullshit.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I'm a noble person who doesn't want to burden people with my illness or whatever.
That's what he's trying to metaphorically describe him.
You know, bases essentially all of his worldview on dumb shit that he read when he was younger and hasn't updated really any of it.
Hangs out with ding-dongs like David Icke who admit that they're just doing improvised storytelling to create a worldview and conspiracies along the way.
I mean, it really goes to show how much a bit of talent and rampant narcissism and unending confidence, how much that can mask itself, even over the course of decades, as expertise, intelligence.
Those things are the facade that...
That hide the lack of those things.
Just a little bit of talent and yelling a bunch so people are afraid to confront you about things.
It seems like a tough thing to accept, unless that's been what you've been doing for your entire career, or at least most of it, and especially lately.