Today, Dan and Jordan dip back to the past to get a break from Alex's current day chaos. In this installment, Alex discusses his defiance-based politics, takes calls with PJW, and laments how his free speech is being infringed by local radio shows not letting him call in to argue. Citations
I had a little bit of a sore shoulder situation going on.
But I was worried that there would be severe side effects, not because I'm vaccine skeptical or anything, but because I went to a Walgreens to get the booster, and I texted you about it.
And what's bright about that spot is that when they went to take a vote on whether or not to say, fuck you to the administration, we're going to go remote and let the chips fall where they may, 88% voted yes.
So I kind of combined a bit of this in my head and in my emotions, and I combined this with the fact that, you know, on our last episode, just Alex was trying to quit.
And then I turned on the 5th, January 5th episode, and I started listening to it, and he just shows up 14 minutes late and almost immediately has mic issues and decides he's got to go off air.
So before we get down to business on today's episode, I wanted to quickly touch on a piece of news that was breaking since we recorded our last episode.
On December 30th, a man named Thomas Apollo showed up at a clinic in Tustin, California, and attacked people who were working there giving out vaccinations, accusing the people of being murderers and that they were making people sick.
According to an article in the Washington Post, quote, Families Together said that the members sustained serious injuries and was sent to the hospital in an ambulance, but that both workers are expected to make a full recovery within a few days.
Obviously, given the publicly available information, I can't sit here and tell you that this guy was a fan of Alex or that that was part of his inspiration, but honestly, I don't even think that that's an important aspect of the story for our purposes.
An attack like this was inevitable, given the extreme quality of the rhetoric that's flying around in the conspiracy and misinformation circles.
You can't try and convince a large group of people that vaccinations are an intentional plot to kill their children and not think that some of them are going to take the next logical step and try to attack people providing vaccinations.
Even Alex knew that, which is why he was building up this narrative in advance, as we saw last week.
We've talked about this a hundred times in the course of doing this show, and it's clear why a person like Alex would behave this way.
His entire career has been made off of profiting from tragedies, so I don't believe for a second that he's not rooting for tragedies to strike.
At the same time, when tragedy does strike, it's good for business to make sure that the audience doesn't start to question whether or not the media they're digesting is part of what's driving these tragedies.
Having a pre-built story in place so the audience blames someone else is critical, and that's why Alex is doing this kind of thing.
I just wanted to take a little moment at the beginning here to point out this very clear dynamic, this cycle that's in play.
And granted, Alex is talking about the bombing of a Pfizer building or something, which is a bit of a more extreme example, I don't believe for a second Alex wouldn't say that this attack of this assault of people at a vaccine clinic wasn't a false flag.
And that's of course why you use the example of blowing up the Pfizer building because that's that sort of like...
Hyperbolic straw man that is, well, see, you think that they would go blow up the Pfizer building, not just go fuck around with this place over here, which is more likely to be what they do.
And, like, blowing up the Pfizer building, if that's, like, your prediction of, like, these are the terrorist attacks, then you kind of have, like, everything less than that covered.
It's just the inevitable consequence of allowing this type of shit to fester.
That's just what it is.
So in the same way that we've just decided that this is how it is for so many different things, I guess this is just how it's going to be for conspiracy.
In the first hour, we have the webmaster of PrisonPlanet.com joining us.
He's Paul Joseph Watson.
He lives in the United Kingdom.
He has a great head on his shoulders for analyzing the New World Order.
We're covering and posting pertinent facts and tracking their lies and doing daily flashbacks to show how they put out different propaganda almost on a daily basis now.
We'll also talk about his upcoming book, and no, we're not offering it yet, and yes, I'm publishing it, Order Out of Chaos.
Hearing that clip of its announcement, the Paul Joseph Watson books being released, I realized that I'd never actually read that book.
I knew that he had it.
I was aware it existed, but I never really felt any real interest to get down to it.
I got the sense of what it was about from the title, Order Out of Chaos.
I knew this was just going to be about the conspiracy idea of the Hegelian dialectic.
Sure.
But ultimately, it didn't bring up anything that Alex hasn't talked about on the show already.
Everything is a false flag, but it's done by the elites in order to increase their power.
You know the drill.
Yeah.
unidentified
I thought that maybe it would be a good idea to discuss the specifics of the book, but I realized that about ten pages into it, I had six pages of notes explaining the things that he got wrong.
Yeah, maybe another day I'll record a 13-hour breakdown review of Paul's book, but that Interesting fun fact, though.
This is the only book that appears to ever have been published by AEJ Productions, which of course stands for Alex Emmerich Jones.
Alex's own book, 9-11, Descent into Tyranny, was published by a different company called the Progressive Press.
This is a publisher that's put out a bunch of books written by Alex's buddy, Webster Tarpley, but also books written by Henry Macow, a dude who is a staunch Holocaust denier and a dude who really just doesn't like the Jews at all.
He recently wrote an article titled, quote, The Riddle of Antisemitism.
Most Jews and non-Jews are unaware that since antiquity Jews consistently have been reviled for a good reason.
Jews are in a state of willful denial.
They don't realize that Judaism is governed by Kabbalah, which is Satanism.
The existence of Judaism is to take God's place, destroy Christianity, and dispossess non-Jews.
So these are the ideas that he has expressed on a recent basis, but trust me, if you cruise around his website, you'll see that he's had this position his whole career, dating back to when his books were published alongside Alex's.
He's also been friends with Leo Zagami for a bit, so that's fun.
Paul didn't have an identity of his own back in 2003, so it's good practice to flatter the person who's willing to advance his career, because it certainly wasn't David Icke at that point.
But by 2013, Paul's in a much more secure position.
He can give it up to his real intellectual father figure, the turd in the punch bowl himself, David Icke.
We've got Catherine Albrecht, the head of Caspian, coming on the show.
We had her on a few weeks ago.
You know, we were talking about RFIDs before RFIDs were cool, as they say.
The small...
Trackable microchips are going to go in all your clothes, all your razors, all your food cans and containers, everything.
And we told you it was about a control grid to tax and trace you.
Well, now, Caspian, their organization, has basically, I don't want to say hacked, but used software to get into internal areas of the big RFID consortium's website and got secret documents.
And the RFID group admits they're accurate and are very angry, and they talk about how they want to, quote, manipulate, neutralize, pacify you, and get you to accept the cashless society control grid.
So, first of all, the notion of putting RFID chips in all your clothes to trace you is a fear that probably shouldn't be taken seriously.
Is it conceivably possible with the technology?
Probably, but what's more important is if it's a practical plan that any evil entity would go for.
The hurdles to this kind of scheme would be gigantic, and some of them are pretty much insurmountable.
What if they're trying to trace you, but unfortunately put a chip in the pair of pants that you don't like that much, or maybe you grew out of?
These are just behavioral concerns, completely leaving aside the absurd technological problems of isolating individual signals that would be coming in if all people's clothes are tagged.
So Catherine Albrecht is a radio host and a demagogue whose big claim to fame is being on that RFID train real early, and apparently she coined the term spy chips.
So she began this organization, Caspian, which sounds a lot better than what it stands for, which is Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering.
This is a group that advocates that stores shouldn't have frequent shopper cards or loyalty programs, and then it kind of moonlights a bit by fighting off the RFID chip as the mark of the beast.
You know, I've said it so many times and it's true because you're calm, you're happy, at least some of the time.
During the breaks, we have discussions that are much more entertaining and interesting and informative than we have on the air.
And it doesn't matter if I'm doing Real Talk Radio on Saturdays with John Stattmiller or if I'm doing...
A show with Michael Trudeau, or I'm just talking to Mark and Matt and Chris and people during the breaks.
We were just trying to one-up each other during the last three-minute break with who bought the most fireworks and who had the best mortar shells and cannons before the BATF comes and gets me.
That's what they call the big tubes you buy that shoot the professional fireworks.
And I was bragging that...
I got a special deal because one of my friends runs a fireworks stand, so I got them at cost.
But by the time we got off, I got done rattling off the different fireworks we had bought.
And also, this is such a fun topic for them to be talking about because Alex's entire show is about police oppression and all this police state nonsense and it's illegal to have fireworks in Austin and no one cares.
Sometimes I just for a few seconds will lose the fire.
The will and the desire to get on the radio and to do interviews morning, noon, and night, and to do my own syndicated show, and I sometimes lose the fire to make a new documentary film, or I lose the fire in my belly to sit there for hours every night reading news stories on the news wires.
But I always get the fire back if I just turn on CNN or Fox or if I listen to talk radio.
And yesterday, I went over to News Talk 1260, KWNX, the great affiliate that picks up my show here in Austin.
And I drove over there, met with the great folks.
We talked about the New World Order.
People shared news stories with me.
I had great discussions with them.
And then I get back in my car, and I'm listening to that station, and I flip over to see what the other station's doing.
And stuck in traffic, I listened to 30 minutes of the host saying that every child needs vaccines.
It should be illegal not to take vaccines.
Everybody should be forced to take all the new vaccines.
This is on the other station.
And how wonderful the vaccines are and how there's all these conspiracy theorists that think vaccines are bad for you.
And so I said, you know, I'm going to call into this station.
And of course, everybody knows my voice.
And I can successfully call into some local stations if I call in and go, oh, yes, I'd like to talk to the host, please.
And the call screener goes, what do you want to discuss?
And I said, well, I want to talk about, and of course in the fake voice, well, because they know what you mean, I won't get on the air.
Well, I'd like to discuss, bring up that he's saying there's no dangers of vaccines.
It's admitted that SV40 in many of the vaccines, not just the polio vaccine, is a dangerous cancer-causing virus.
They admit it's caused all these new forms of cancer.
This is admitted by major medical establishments, University of Chicago.
He goes, what else?
And I said, well, I said, autism's up 2,000%, and some of it could be misdiagnosis or more diagnosis, but a lot of it has been proven to the additives of the vaccine.
They've admitted that.
George Bush had the vaccine record sealed and tried to sign an executive order and then passed a law that got repealed, by the way.
I didn't tell him that part.
Last year, guarding the vaccine maker.
So I said this to him, and of course I had something cogent to say, and he said, nope, I'm sorry, we're not going to let you on the air.
And I said, why not?
And he said, well, I just don't agree with what you're saying.
And I said, but it doesn't matter if you agree.
It doesn't matter if you agree with what I'm saying, sir.
I'd like a chance to talk.
And he said, nope.
And I said, so there's no free speech on this station.
Now, understand, I'm not talking about News Talk 1260 KWNX.
I'm talking about this other station owned by the president's family, the president from Austin, we'll just say that, that, by the way, just got sold to a big conglomerate.
They've always been totally New World Order, neocon, you know, liberal stuff on the slide.
Second, clearly the patience with which that call screener listened to Alex both In and out of his accent, because I very strongly doubt he could keep it up for that consistent length of time.
So that call screener definitely heard Alex drop it and then repeat it in the voice.
But if I were a call screener and I were trying to run a professional program, I would not let somebody on the air who's just going to clearly try and derail things.
With nonsense conspiracies that we don't need to...
And that does sound like something you would say because you hate the Constitution and the Founding Fathers who died for your right to go on any radio show whenever you want to say whatever you want.
Well, I mean, just because he believes that that station, because it disagrees with them, should be taken off the air forever by the federal government doesn't mean he doesn't believe in the First Amendment, Dan!
Vaccines, if they were produced properly by trustworthy organizations, not eugenics-obsessed Nazis, publicly funding extermination programs worldwide against the third world and being caught doing it to the vaccines, official government plans, Australian, U.S., Canadian, British, to do this.
We didn't have all the reports.
The mercury and the mycoplasms and the cancer viruses and the weird hormones and the UN getting caught sterilizing women with a tetanus shot that had a hormone added.
I mean, this is all admitted.
But yeah, we have companies that can be trusted in four or five groups, independently tested the vaccine lots, and yes, vaccines can be a good thing.
So I'm not talking about these specific things that he's bringing up and rattling off, because they're all things that we've discussed in the past, and it's all nonsense.
But I think the crowning nonsense is this idea that there would ever be...
Some kind of an organization that is trustworthy enough for Alex.
You know, like, hey, look, all of these other companies and scientists and public health non-governmental organizations, they're all fucking eugenicists who are trying to kill everybody off.
There was an Alzheimer's vaccine candidate that was in trials in 2003, which unfortunately did cause some serious side effects, and the trials were abandoned.
I say unfortunately because follow-up studies of people in those trials found that it, quote, halted and even reversed the brain disease in some who got the shots.
Obviously, there are severe side effects, and if that's the case like it was in this case with 18 out of 300 patients getting brain inflammation, it may not be something that you can justify going any further with.
But the idea that there was some promise for a cure there was really exciting.
Anybody who's had a loved one with Alzheimer's could tell you that it's a pretty hellish prospect, or it can be, and a vaccine would be huge.
The lessons learned from these trials informed further research, and it's still ongoing, with a new trial beginning in late 2021 for a nasally administered vaccine that...
There have been nicotine vaccines that have been developed, but a 2008 article in the journal Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, it discusses the state of these vaccines, and it found that, quote, although these therapies have had some success, relapse within a year is still high.
So it's not really a strategy that people think is like, this is where we're going to go.
That's a fake point Alex is creating to argue against because these specifics help him bolster this idea that every year dozens more vaccines become mandatory, which is nonsense.
I think if that framing is what you want to use, that's great, but also you need to know that the federal government doesn't require any vaccines.
That's a state-level issue, which is why the ability for people to get various exemptions for things like school-related vaccines, it varies wildly from state to state.
Now, the idea with what Biden's doing with the vaccine mandate is slightly different in the current day, but I don't think that you can make an analogy between some of these things like measles or mumps and rubella shots that some states require for people to go to school and an active pandemic.
I think that there are relevant differences there.
But what Alex is complaining about in 2003, this notion that the government is trying to make vaccines mandatory, that exists on a state level, and based on Alex's politics, he should have no problem with that, even if he's opposed to these vaccines, because the states get to choose these things, and if you don't like it, you can move to another state.
I'm not saying that that's a good answer to things, but based on Alex's politics and his positions on other things, that's...
It's almost like this whole separation between federal and state government is kind of arbitrary based upon whatever it is he feels like his position should be in at any given point in time.
Now, Paul Joseph Watson, I became aware of his work a couple years ago when he started PropagandaMatrix.com.
And I don't work with a lot of people, because a lot of folks get off into conspiracy theories, things they can't prove, they're leftward-leaning, they're rightward-leaning, they're not constitutionalists.
Most Americans now have heard the government carried out 9-1-1.
Many Americans have investigated it and found out that it is in fact the truth.
And just like Galileo was a kook for saying the world was round, just a decade later after his death, people, most people knew that it was round and you were a kook to say it was flat.
So joining us is another radical.
A man who believes the world is round and believes the sun comes up in the morning and believes government is corrupt and needs to be watched and contained, Paul Joseph Watson.
Paul, thanks for joining us from the United Kingdom.
So earlier, when we were discussing the dedications of Paul's book, I mentioned that he's given two different stories about who woke him up at different points in his career.
Now, in this interview, he might have another third.
Well, this ties into something you were discussing just a few minutes ago, actually.
The idea of paradigm management or paradigm control.
Basically, I woke up to the New World Order by realising that both left and right were controlled because originally I got into politics in the first place through the liberal channel, basically.
Then I started to read some books which proved that both the left and the right were controlled, especially in relation to the biggest example that we can provide, which is the Cold War.
Obviously, we know the work of Anthony Sutton, who's done a great job.
Now, deceased, sadly, but he did a great job in exposing the fact that the communists were actually funded from New York by the Capitol.
So, part of the thing that woke up, Paul, was the realization that the left and the right are funded by the same folks, and that comes from him reading the work of Anthony Sutton.
And he was worked generously.
Sudden is most known for writing three books known as the Wall Street Trilogy.
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution is about Wall Street funding communism, Wall Street and FDR is about funding FDR, and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler is about funding of the Nazi Party.
Though exciting and full of insinuation and rumor, these books have been absolutely trashed by historians who have reviewed them, with one summing up the Bolshevik book this way.
He tells us nothing new.
He does repeat unsubstantiated allegations, cite irrelevant facts, make unwarranted conclusions, and record it all in an appallingly pedestrian style.
None of the three sources that Paul has cited as being the source of his awakening are in any way respectable.
David Icke is a lunatic, Alex is a narcissistic liar, and Anthony Sutton's work is critically flawed and boils down to unconfirmed conspiracy nonsense.
And I've just recently found an article which hasn't been online or anywhere that I've seen, and it's way back in 1959, and it's from the Wisconsin Daily Journal.
And the title of the article is Kozlov leaving California for Chile, Detroit.
And it's an Associated Press article, and it goes on to explain how Kozlov, Romanovich Kozlov, who was Khrushchev's right-hand man, was invited in 1959 to Bohemian Grove.
Obviously, your listeners are well aware of Bohemian Grove.
And the quote in this Associated Press article is that he was wined and dined by the capitalist.
So it is true that Kozlov was at Bohemian Grove in 1959, but here's the question we really need to be asking ourselves.
If newspapers were reporting on the fact that a Russian guy was a guest at Bohemian Grove in 1959, how secret was this whole thing, really?
Did Alex really do anything to expose the Grove to the world, or was it something people reported on freely like 20 years before he was even born?
You can find an article from 1959 even in the New York Times about Kozlov's visit to the Grove, which according to Alex's mythology should absolutely have never happened.
So little known fact to folks who listen to Alex Jones.
Actually, the land that Bohemian Grove sits on was originally part of a Russian colony that dated back to 1812.
Fishermen had attempted to form a foothold in America, the Russians, and they had formed a colony.
It was a huge bust, though, as competition from other colonists led to the decimation of sea otter populations, and the Russians ended up withdrawing in 1841, selling off the land to Johann Augustus Sutter.
Sutter would go on to find gold on the land and strike it rich.
in 1959 there's this article that's like pretty in-depth discussion of stuff that had gone on there which completely runs counter to Alex's idea that like oh people would have to look in with binoculars There was still like five or six more years before Nixon would show up and get a handy.
Anyway, look, the conflict between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, particularly in times around 1959, was one that we needed diplomacy to handle.
They were our enemies on some level, but there wasn't a state of outright hostilities.
So the idea that a politician like Kozlov would be on a diplomatic visit to the United States, which he was, and while he was here he'd be invited to the Grove, none of that seems weird at all.
I guess for Paul, though, it serves as proof that the U.S. and the Soviet Union were just faking the Cold War.
Yeah, and I mean, you can even find in the Department of State, their Foreign Relations Journal, you can find a long transcription of a conversation that Kozlov and Eisenhower had.
So, also, in that clip, I think you see one of the most universal hallmarks of Alex's politics.
He sincerely believes that everyone makes decisions on what to support or oppose based on what the people they're against think.
If my villains are in favor of something, it must be bad, so I'm against it.
If my villains oppose something, it must be good, so I'm all about it.
Alex believes that other people think this way because that's how he thinks.
The difference for him is that the enemy he has is completely imaginary and their preferences are just things that he's decided he's decoded from reading headlines.
Through using his psychic intuition, Alex has figured out what the globalists are in favor of and this is what he opposes.
Everything for him is based on this kind of thinking.
The globalists want people to be vaccinated, therefore there must be a conspiracy involved and vaccinations are evil.
The globalists are interested in conservation efforts and worried about climate change.
Therefore, that must be a conspiracy to further some other nefarious aim.
I was thinking about it, and even his support of gun rights could be seen through this prism.
There isn't anything intrinsic about owning a gun that Alex supports.
His staunch gun rights position is rooted in a belief that disarming the population is part of the plan that the globalists have to take over and institute martial law all over the world, have a one-world government.
Sure.
unidentified
The only way to fight back against a plan that is totally 100% real is for everyone in the world to be armed.
What if the prevailing attitude among politicians that Alex didn't like was that everyone should have a gun?
If the globalists supported gun rights, then the only way to try and subvert their agenda would be to be in favor of draconian gun restrictions so you don't make their evil plans come to pass.
Well, I mean, you don't want Antifa getting guns, the 100% real group that is going to attack and kill all Republicans if they have guns, so you have to be forced.
So this caller is reading from a blog post from 2000 written by a person identifying themselves as a San Diego police detective named Philip Wart.
It is possible that this is a real attribution, because I can find multiple news articles about cases involving a detective in San Diego by that name, but even if that's the case, this isn't an article that you should be citing to make any actual points.
So I found the blog post, and it's actually a screed against community policing and how that's just a Marxist conspiracy.
If you read through it, it seems like a really significant problem that this police detective has is that people are raising questions about whether or not the mode of policing that's become the norm in America was sufficiently sensitive to the concerns of diverse communities that they're supposed to be policing.
This just seems like a dude who's really pissed off that the concerns of white Christian men aren't the only factor that matters, and that means that he must have uncovered a communist plot.
Yeah.
unidentified
That's basically the long and short of that article.
San Diego, chargers, chargers, charging credit cards, credit cards, centralization of money, trying to get rid of the physical dollar, electronic currency, communism.
The major point for this is the moral decline of society.
You can go to the 45 goals of communism and find, and this has entered into the congressional record, and number 25 actually states that present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as normal.
That goes back to UNESCO saying the family's a disease, terminated, but it's okay to say heterosexuals are a disease and should be terminated and call us breeders.
So this is being presented as if it's something that has any credibility, but in reality, if you go find out where this list of 45 communist goals was read into the congressional record, you'll find that it was Representative Herlong from Florida, and the comments are introduced this way.
Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of DeLand, Florida, is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the DeLand Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.
At Ms. Nordman's request, I include into the record, under unanimous consent, the following current communist goals, which she identified as an excerpt from The Naked Communist by Cleon Skousen.
In 1963, some woman in Florida sent a representative a passage from Skousen's bullshit, and he read it into the congressional record, so now we're expected to take it seriously.
Quote, create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition.
Alex loves to talk about watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants, and he's been pretty clear that even though January 6th was a false flag, even if it wasn't, it would be fine because the people were there and they had a right to do an insurrection if they disagree with the election results.
So the CIA did have involvement with Steinem, but Alex and Paul are really overreaching here.
Gloria Steinem was involved in the CIA as part of her efforts to recruit left-leaning youths to go to a Vienna conference being held by communists who could effectively debate the communists about the virtues of America.
She did this as the head of the Independent Research Service, a CIA-funded outfit at Harvard.
Steinem wrote about this experience in her book My Life on the Road.
Alex honestly should totally support her work with the CIA since the goal of it was to disrupt events like this Vienna Conference that were seen as being communist propaganda.
This is a really reductive view that Paul and Alex are taking, and it's because the goal for them isn't to assess facts and report information accurately.
They're invested in attacking and discrediting feminism.
So every supposed fact needs to work in service of that predetermined endpoint that they're engaged in.
When you're blaming the CIA and commies for essentially the acceptance of homosexuality and feminism existing, what you're doing is saying that without these nefarious actors, straight white men would rule everything.
Well, yeah, I mean, if a woman wants to be a brain surgeon or a rocket scientist, I'm sure she can do a great job as good or better than a man.
The point is that, and they tried to brainwash women to do this, but their instincts, what their desire has switched back against them, so the government's panicking.
All these professional women now want to make money early so they can go be mommies at home.
And enjoy that incredible thing that God's created.
But the CIA came in, it's admitted, broke up the family so they'd have women working in factories so they could have a higher tax bracket, the taxes at higher levels, so the kids would be in the daycare centers and the head start getting their vaccines, learning how to turn mommy and daddy in for owning a gun.
It seems like, to me, that the commies that are most often referenced by the anti-communists have nothing to do with straight white men, despite the fact that at the time of Russia, when the anti-communists were supposed to be fighting, all straight white men.
All straight white men.
In Russia, all straight white men.
So their enemy was all straight white men, but the communist enemy!
Again, conservatives would have been against the Vietnam War, but they would hire beatniks.
And many of them known government agents.
This is now public, folks.
They would come into a town, spit on people, break windows, act like horrible beasts, and then the conservatives would go, well, this war must be good if these guys are out here doing this.
Conservatives would have loved Martin Luther King Jr. if the CIA and the communists hadn't hired a bunch of black people to go wreck everything in white neighborhoods.
It totally would have happened.
Conservatives would have fucking loved Martin Luther King Jr. if it weren't for the fucking commies, Dan.
If a beatnik comes to your bar, and then you've got a little bowl of nuts, and you're drinking your beer, and the beatnik knocks the nuts over, You think to yourself, well, obviously, we should burn down villages in Vietnam.
I mean, this is like a sort of tired example on our show, but it's one of the few things that I think Alex and I agree on, and that's the, you know, cops and civil acid forfeiture.
Who says that anyone that, yeah, and you notice then in the redefinition, he gets fired off MSNBC for saying something about a group and engaging in the First Amendment.
But it's bad to talk about the homosexuals, but not bad to say put anyone in a forced labor camp that disagrees with the government.
Yeah, that was, I mean, that's a particularly distasteful presentation that he gave.
I don't know if Alex understands the First Amendment.
If the government had done something in response to him being horribly homophobic and abusive to this person on air, then I think you might have some kind of a First Amendment discussion, but...
He did something on a live show that was incredibly awful and against the standards of the station, and they fired him for it.
I find it really fascinating to go back to these points deep in the past and just see this completely infantile understanding of something that's supposed to be a bedrock issue for him.
I remember hearing about it and then not seeing it and then, I don't know.
Anyway, the conversation about Independence Day leads to them talking about how the globalists are going to fake an alien invasion in order to bring us all together and create a world government.
However, the industry is also to deal with considerable consumer ignorance and scaremongering, for instance, the consumer sphere that health impacts of RFID tags, presuming, I guess, the microwatts the tags momentarily use to communicate are somehow more dangerous than holding a more powerful transmitter against your ear.
That's a good point.
Cell phones are dangerous.
I suggest you use a navigator, a little plug in your ear.
A lot of people lay it in their lap and then get genital cancer.
You know, listening back to these pre-smartphone era, there is that same thing you see in movies where they have to contrive a reason where you can't find your smartphone in a horror movie because otherwise the story would be like, you called someone and you're like, let's get the fuck out of here, this is dumb.
So many conspiracy theories, even now, have to find a way to avoid talking about the fact that your phone does 99% of everything they've ever been afraid of since the dawn of conspiracy theories.
My phone tells me how many fucking steps I've taken.
You think the government doesn't know where I'm stepping?
It is true that, essentially, Given all of the conspiracy threads that existed prior to smartphones and such, all of them should have just woven together into a grand conspiracy theory that is this.
And then the other thing, too, I just wanted to cover this episode for was the bizarre conversation about free speech involved with him going to call into a radio show.
Just to imagine Alex sitting there trying to do a fake voice, calling into a show, them not letting him on the show, and then him immediately calling everyone he knows.