Yeah, first of all, the most critical issue is we know that they depleted their reserves of the interceptor for the Patriot missiles and for the Thought and other types. So this is a critical issue. So should You know, they start attacking and Iran will start answering. So think of this, what kind of the damage can be inflicted to the, uh, first of all, Israel and where they can reach, uh, all, of course, uh, you know, surrounding, uh, Gulf, Persian Gulf monarchies like UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Iranians would not refrain or do it, you know, from humanitarian purpose. They know pretty well this is a life for their survival and they will heat, first of all, all interests connected to the American interest like, Uh, we've been, you know, seeing they've been attacking not only military bases, but they attack the refineries where American companies, uh, been involved, even data centers like Ozone. Uh, they've been attacking American banks in UAE. So this was quite a painful, you know, answer. So this is another factor. If he ignore and still force the military to go, that's, uh, really looking for the big failure, for the real, you know, a big disaster, fiasco.

And only one Trump card they've got. This is actually a nuclear bomb.

If they send in Marines and Army, which Israel's advising, they will be pinned down. And doctrinally, we use tactical nukes at that point.

But after receiving thousands of records and declassified reports from the Army, it's confirmed that during the Cold War, the United States military conducted secret tests on unsuspecting people in the city of St. Louis. Lisa Martino-Taylor's life work has been to uncover details of the Army's ultra-secret military experiments carried out in St. Louis and other cities during the 1950s and 60s. This thing was secretive for a reason. They didn't have volunteers stepping up and saying, Yeah, I'll breathe zinc cadmium sulfide with radioactive particles. These Army archive pictures show how the tests were done in Corpus Christi, Texas in the 1960s. In Texas, planes were used to drop the chemical, but in St. Louis, the Army placed chemical sprayers on buildings and station wagons. City officials were kept in the dark about the tests. The Cold War cover story was that the Army was testing smoke screens to protect cities from a Russian attack.

We're just, we're like getting ready for a cavalry charge after machine guns have been invented. We're not in the right paradigm yet.

For these reasons, the United States military is undertaking a massive and ongoing operation to prevent this very wicked, radical dictatorship from threatening America and our core national security interests. We're going to destroy their missiles and raise their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally, again, obliterated. We're going to annihilate their Navy.

They've got drones now loaded with neutron bombs, but little ones, where a drone just flies over, drops a neutron bomb, and it kills everybody in three square miles. Or you can drop a smaller one, kills everybody in a square mile. And there's nothing there. The person just gets hit, kind of gets nauseous, starts bleeding out the nose, falls down and dies. And that's old technology. That's 60s technology. But now they've miniaturized it, deployed it.

It involved more than 150 aircraft launching across the western hemisphere in close coordination, all coming together in time and place to layer effects for a single purpose, to get an interdiction force into downtown Caracas while maintaining the element of tactical surprise.

I was like, yo, the United States, when Jim Crow was happening in the South, the military got sent in. You desegregated the South by force.

And I think that this is your typical gunboat diplomacy, which is you literally put a giant gunship off the coast of a country. You start blowing stuff up. And then you say, This is the United States of America. You have 24 hours to leave. So you're right. I mean, there is a reason they have the warships there, and that is for a demonstration of force. It's a gesture, which reinforces deterrence. Deterrence is really the foundation of everything.

Yeah, it's the biggest force posture in the Caribbean ever, I think is what they said. It's more warships that have ever been deployed in that in the Southern Command field of command than ever in the United States.

You can refuse illegal orders. You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders.

And that's why we were over there. We were over there guarding those fields. I say we, not me. Not you. We weren't there. Yeah, but Americans were. And Geraldo Rivera fucking went over there to visit them and talked to a guy, this military guy, who explained why they have to guard the poppy fields. And what did the guy say? It was like basically saying, you know, we have to protect these people from al-Qaeda. Like, listen. Al-Qaeda we started. Do you know how gaslight-y that is? Just think of how gaslight-y that is. We have to protect these kind and humble heroin growers. We have to protect them from these other people who are just terrorists who live here. And we're here. We invaded this place to keep these people from stopping these people from selling heroin.

Well, that's the argument for a strong military, right? So the argument for a strong military, especially like the United States military, is like, and I'm not saying they should have bombed Iran. I'm not politically savvy enough to decide whether or not that was the correct decision. But if you have a rogue nation that is about to start a nuclear bomb, they're about to finish making a nuclear bomb and you can stop that before they can have one and then use it. That's the argument for a strong military and for military interventional tactics. Like actually just go and bomb these sites.

But I would imagine when I see the movements going on and the nuclear launch codes that anyone can see being sent out, that they're scrambled to the submarines, to the bombers and to the ground forces that have ground based missiles. Those are nuclear launch codes and targeting codes. That's called taking the safety off.

Because at the end of the day, although the United States military has been decimated with this ideology, I don't believe that most Americans who will put on a uniform in the service of this country will ever go to war against their own country.

There's not gonna be no civil war, because as of right now, Donald Trump is commander in chief, and I know that for a fact because the military, when they found out that the military Because the plan was to have, and Liz Churchill always speaks on this, the plan was to have eight years Obama, eight years Hillary. And to have already, they wanted to include the New World Order and all these policies and all these things that are going on right now in the world.

And that attack will be used to cancel the 2024 presidential election to enlist probably half a million. Illegals into our military, many of which will have allegiance to different countries.

That every year, the United States military receives roughly $800 billion on a yearly basis. And, and, this is the most important part, no one really knows where it goes. Sure. Okay? There's no actual accounting for it.

The moment I looked into the military budget and how at a point they were like, oh yeah, so we tried to, but you cannot audit this money. You'll never know where it's going to go. And so the idea of the yearly, oh, we're going to give you $800 billion thing is purely ceremonial. The idea is if the military wants something, they will get it. There's no real money.

Well, it's 4,800. 4,800. Yeah, maybe AOL won't tell you, but it's official in British papers.

I can tell you that Nacassoni has been running a very effective monitoring system and that we have deployed military elements all over the country. I can tell you that in North Florida, the amount of planes that have come in with war equipment, with a regular army, National Guard, and others has increased markedly.

So the military is the first part to say to themselves, are we in fact in charge? And you are now in charge. Your commanders-in-chief are not in charge. They are illegal. They are a legal presence, and therefore it justifies you at the level of the colonel, the lieutenant colonel, and the major level to question the authority of the commander-in-chief at every level because they have been indicted for war criminals. You do not have a commander-in-chief who is legal and authoritative no matter what he says. He's just been indicted for war crimes. Therefore, I ask our military officers, our veterans, to stand up and say that this is enough.

And then she talks about how our military is at war with the Kingdom of Mu, which still exists. They exist underwater. They have underwater bases. The military is engaging with them.

I mean, if we had the will to actually go up against the military, we would trash them from one end to the other. We're not Iraqis who historically aren't the best shots in the field.

Every analyst agrees this could trigger World War III unlike anything in our history.

We probably killed 10,000 freaking Russians.