That's what the lockdowns were about. I mean, they wanted to make us depressed and isolated.
And oh, there's a next lockdown will be far worse and much longer.
Of children, everybody, it's all about just raping your freedom.
The algorithm for sure, but also the lockdowns. I think the lockdown shifted a lot of people. I think it broke. I genuinely think they broke a lot of people psychologically. And it made people just a little less kind.
See, that's why the lockdown's biggest crime wasn't just the 80-plus million the U.N. estimates starved to death the last three and a half years. On top of the normal 15 million, they starve to death each year.
New lockdowns will starve the third world. New lockdowns will destroy small businesses. New lockdowns will take the average person that's already $5,000 in the hole and their paycheck is just on time. We'll put them into full bankruptcy.
By the way, that's part of the reason why they had to do the lockdowns. The lockdown was to allow for the incubation period so the humans would be kept in space. Because when, okay, when you're out and you're moving around and all the humans are out moving around. Don't explain it. Everything gets released through the field of resonance. It dissipates. They didn't want it to dissipate. They wanted it to incubate. So they had to have this so-called lockdown.
So going through my stack today, I ran across six or seven articles where people are saying, you know, if there's new lockdowns, it's going to kill tens of millions more people. We can't allow this. And cutting off the fossil fuels is going to kill hundreds of millions over the next decade, if not billions, as society collapses.
The UN said two years ago the lockdowns were going to put 278 million people, they estimated, on the verge of starvation, and an extra 20 million a year would die. And they nailed it, and that's accurate.
Coming out in a 60-plus page report saying lockdowns are a fraud and have killed more people than the virus and that the economic destruction of it is going to starve hundreds of millions of people to death, which is true.
Three studies out of six that included information about the effect of bar and restaurant closures reflected a reduction of over 28% in mortality. The numbers were 28.6, 31.6 and 50.2 in those three studies. That is absurdly high. Now, the other three studies out of the six that looked at the specifics of bar and restaurant closures showed essentially no effect.
Roughly ten times the number of people died from the lockdowns than actually died from the virus, even if you believe official numbers.
Because the globalists are about to stage their own false flags and blame those of us exposing their violence against us with their lockdowns and their tyranny and telling us we're not essential and trying to lock us down and bankrupt us and make us commit suicide. That's violence!
Well, the other problem they have is more and more people are seeing the consequences of the lockdowns. So as they, that was the intelligence of Trump postponing certain stimulus benefits and the rest, as people started to realize there are real economic harms, real social harms of the lockdowns that are much more dangerous than COVID is.