In this installment, Dan and Jordan take in the experience that is Tucker Carlson interviewing Alex Jones. While it may not be as drunk and enjoyable to watch as when Alex has been on Rogan, it definitely still gets racist and weird.
But from the standpoint of somebody who likes podcasts and listens to podcasts, I listen to it and I'm like, I could not handle the idea that the thing that I make is being randomly interrupted by this shit.
Anyway, my bright spot is...
They're usually these brands of like, you know, MeUndies or whatever.
So, Jordan, today we have an episode to go over, and we're a little bit late on this upload, and that's because there was a little bit of a turnabout yesterday.
We're recording this in the morning-ish of Friday, and it's because last night, Tucker Carlson, the most important man in the world, released an interview with Alex Jones.
You know, I wish that sometimes in life this would be the moment where people like Alex and Tucker would be in Maine and then, you know, just like a discus, some sort of Greek mythological event hits them and is just like...
Fishing show.
And then they just go and they record a fishing show out back, you know?
We have a ruling class in the United States defined by its hatreds, not its loves, not its hopes, but by its hatreds.
They hate all kinds of people, large groups of people, the deplorables, the bitter clingers, America's entire blue collar population, the unfashionable people.
So you can see here already some of the elementary rhetorical tricks Tucker is going to use to whitewash Alex for the audience.
The first is the confusing mixing up of all these consequences Alex has had for his actions.
Alex was kicked off a bunch of social media platforms, and that was because of his actions.
You can argue that his actions should be considered acceptable speech and the platforms are wrong to kick him off, so I'm going to be hyper generous and put this consequence in one basket.
This is a case of corporate censorship seeking to protect advertising.
I'm going to put that as the most generous version of this you can say.
The second thing brought up is that Alex was sued.
This was the result of his own actions, defaming the families of the victims at Sandy Hook.
This was not censorship.
It's a consequence of his behavior.
And this is a point that's kind of important to understand.
If that lawsuit resulted in any censorship...
That's Alex's own fault.
If the families wanted to run him out of business so he couldn't hurt anyone the way that he hurt them, that's Alex's fault.
Not censorship.
It may appear like censorship, but it's a consequence of Alex's actions.
So this is in another basket, which I'm going to call Alex causing his own problems.
Then Tucker says that Alex was attacked.
I have no idea what that means, and it's vague to the point of being meaningless.
If he's talking about people criticizing Alex and his stupid ideas, then I think this is just whining.
If it's about physical attacks, then I'd be curious what those are, because I can't think of anything.
Alex got yelled at at a chicken restaurant, and it became a week's worth of content for his show, complaining about how he's the victim here, so I imagine if Alex was actually attacked in any meaningful way, you would never hear the end of it.
This goes in another basket that I'm calling meaningless.
Also, how do you try to criminally charge somebody?
Grand juries, baby.
He was requested for testimony in front of the January 6th committee, but he wasn't charged, and there was no chance he would be.
I would bet just about anything that he's committed some crimes in the context of his bankruptcy, but he hasn't been charged with anything.
The most accurate position here is that Alex has been given an undeserved level of lenience in his life.
So this is another one that goes in the meaningless basket.
These are the things that the man has done to Alex, but none of it means anything.
The most concrete, closest to real thing Tucker has is that Alex was kicked off social media, and that was a corporate decision made to protect ad revenue.
The rest of this stuff is either not real, This is all a load of shit, but it's important for Tucker to present Alex as a victim right up front.
In Tucker's culture, it's important that all of the extremists that he platforms and sanitizes, they're just blameless people that the man hates for no reason!
When he questioned the official story behind 9-11, and I, speaking for myself, was deeply offended by this.
I didn't take any time to find out what he was saying, but I was bothered by the idea that this defining event in American history, which changed the life of everyone who lived here then, might not actually have unfolded as we were told it did.
And that possibility was too destabilizing.
And I remember feeling resentment toward Alex Jones for saying that.
But several years later, I wound up in Austin, Texas, and through a chain of circumstances, wound up meeting Alex Jones.
And I learned what everyone who has met him now knows, which is Alex Jones is not a crazy person.
Alex Jones has said pretty far out things on TV from time to time.
Not that far out.
He hasn't said men can become women, or Ukraine is a democracy, but within the bounds of, say, cable news, pretty far out.
Also, you notice that Tucker is clear that he just had a knee-jerk reaction to what he assumed Alex said back then and then he didn't look into it.
That behavior pattern hasn't changed, but his stance on Alex did because he happened to be in Austin and he met Alex.
This seems to happen to a lot of people.
They think Alex is out there and maybe crazy and then they meet him and their tune changes.
I suspect this happens for two reasons.
One is that people like Tucker aren't serious people to begin with and their perspectives are as malleable as aluminum foil.
The second is that Alex is a narcissist, and in small bursts, narcissists are super fun to be around.
Their ability to carry on as they do relies on people liking them, so narcissists have intense levels of charisma they can turn on to charm people when they need to.
Folks like Tucker and Joe Rogan come into contact with this and mistake it for friendship, or him being a cool guy.
And as to Tucker's point that Alex isn't crazy...
If he wants to stand behind that, I demand he rationalize a full episode of Alex's show to his own audience.
Play the shit where Alex fake cries about God choosing him to vanquish the literal devil and see how well you can play this.
He's actually a really well-adjusted person, Gabe.
Get the fuck out of here.
He's well-adjusted in the version you want to present of him, but not as he actually is.
Yeah, I think what I'm weirded out by now so much with Alex is like...
As far as Alex is concerned, he's not the front page anymore.
The idea of Alex has now taken over completely.
So what people talk about, you know, anytime I'm hearing people talking about Alex, nobody is talking about, oh, here's what's happening on Alex's show.
Everyone's talking about the proverbial Alex, the theoretical Alex.
But fundamentally, Alex Jones is right about a lot of things.
And in fact, that's why they don't like him.
Alex Jones has an uncanny, really an amazing ability to predict events before they happen.
He has called it and he's done it on tape again and again to the point where it's a meme on the Internet.
Alex Jones, profit.
Not conspiracy nut, profit.
But when you dig into Alex Jones' predictions, they are so spot on that it's remarkable.
How does he do this?
We're guessing there's a kind of spiritual sensitivity to Alex Jones.
Maybe that's his secret.
He was displaying this years before the average person in this country even thought about matters like that.
Now it's pretty obvious to most people that...
The current war going on in this country is taking place in ways you can't see it most of the time, but 10 years ago people were not thinking about what Alex Jones was.
Yeah, man, but hearing that kind of stuff spouted by Tucker.
Is either just a sign of how desperately he's trying to make Alex look normal, or it's a sign that maybe a lot of this is a bit more pervasive in extreme right ideology than we like to think.
It may very well be that this is just the schema now.
Yeah, I mean, well, I think it's going to wind up being both.
Because there's going to be the thing that happens that goes both ways.
So on the one side, you have the people that I've been having conversations with for the longest time where they're like, okay, I understand what you think about religion and all this stuff.
But most people don't really believe it's real, real.
It's more of like a way to interact with all this stuff and all that stuff.
And then I go, listen, I know what you're saying.
Stop it.
They do.
But now we're in a situation where Tucker is starting to look like that.
And it's one of those things that in my mind it's messed me up because it feels like this is the type of shit that exists only in the past whenever people hadn't dealt with it before.
But you can just scream the same thing loud enough for long enough and then the world will believe it.
That is a true thing that can happen sometimes.
And Alex is an example of that.
You can just scream a not true thing loud enough and long enough, and eventually the world, or at least a large part of it, will go, sounds true to me?
Yeah, and you can just have the world's shittiest track record, but if you create a little video that makes it look like you actually have a great track record, somehow people just ignore the fact that you're so wrong about everything all the time.
And it's one of the great blessings of my life and of my job is that I've been able to meet people that I've had preconceptions about and sometimes find those preconceptions.
Bolstered.
And in other cases, demolished.
And you're definitely in the second category.
So I want, for people who've made it this far, you know, the people who are in the country have really succeeded in making you disreputable.
And the whole point, of course, is people won't listen to you.
So we thought it'd be interesting to start with a series of on-tape predictions that you made, some of which are so precise and so prescient that it makes the hair on my arms stand up.
I'm being sincere, and our viewers are about to see what I'm talking about.
Here is a list of things that you called ahead of time.
So that first one is Alex predicting in August 2023 that we would all have to wear mask skin in September.
It's now December, and this prediction was not accurate.
However, Alex plays a clip of an anchor from the show Rising discussing a story with the Chiron, quote, Atlanta College reinstates mask mandates for students and employees.
This was a story about Morris Brown College, which has a student body of about 400 and is a private college.
All of this sensational reporting around this story was flawed, since it didn't point out that this was a temporary two-week mandate, and it was caused by a spike in cases being found at the University Health Center.
By the first week of September, about two weeks later, that mandate was lifted.
This first example is not a case of Alex being right or predicting anything.
It's an example of him talking the same shit he talks all the time and then pulling off a sleight-of-hand trick where he juxtaposes it with an out-of-context news report that makes it look like he was right.
Alex specifically predicted that all of his listeners and airline employees would be required to wear masks, and that's categorically wrong.
So after prediction number one, hair on my arms, remain unstood up.
I wonder if the person who invented the Chiron on the news broadcast, I wonder if they're going to feel good.
You know, if there is an afterlife, do you think they're going to be like, ah, we did it, or like, ooh, we really may have ruined everything but movies.
We know the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to blow up airliners, Baltimore Sun, or if you let some terrorist group do it, like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame.
And if there was an outside threat like a bin Laden who was a known CIA asset in the 80s, this group and this leader, a person named Osama bin Laden, he's the boogeyman they need.
So if you pay close attention, you'll notice that there's some pretty strategic cuts being used here to create the appearance that Alex made a complete, fully accurate prediction about 9-11.
But that's another parlor trick.
The first clip is Alex saying that, quote, we know the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to blow up airliners, Baltimore Sun.
This is just him talking about Operation Northwoods, although at this point in his career he didn't know that name, so he just referenced it by pointing to the Sun article about it.
The second clip is Alex saying, if you let some terrorists do it like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame.
This is not him predicting an attack on the World Trade Center.
He's referencing the 1993 bombing, which he also believes is a false flag.
He's saying if you let some terrorists do it, like in 1993 at the World Trade Center, this is not saying the World Trade Center is going to be the target.
The next clip is Alex saying, and if there was an outside threat like a bin Laden, who's a known CIA asset in the 80s.
I'll give Alex this one, but I also qualify it as not being that impressive of a prediction, because bin Laden had taken credit for the 93 bombing and wouldn't stop telling people he wanted to attack the U.S. again.
These are not all from one cohesive thought Alex was putting out on his show, but when they're smashed together like this, it makes it look like Alex was solving Clue.
It was Bin Laden at the World Trade Center with airplanes.
That's the image that Alex's slick video is meant to convey, and it's the fraudulent image that Tucker is passing along to his audience.
Another important issue to point out is that there's some discrepancy on the dates of these clips that they're being shown in this compilation.
The original video says it's from July 25th, 2001, whereas the new compilation has a label on it for July 21st.
I don't think that there's anything suspicious going on here, I just think the people at InfoWars are lazy and do bad work.
Also, what I've not understood, and I assume that the interview will actually bear this out, that's what I assume this is for, is fine if you think that Alex has predicted this shit, but to me, if you're going to be like, oh, well, this person should be heralded for predicting the future correctly, that means that they should then be able to tell me, like, okay, well, if the future's going to be this, then we should do this now so the future does not become that, right?
I don't think they're going to get into that in the interview, but there are obvious implications that you can take away from the things that Alex is saying.
Right, but I mean, what's the point of telling me?
I just hate that you're letting the prophet religion thing do so much work whenever what you're really saying is...
Because I like what this guy says, I'm going to make it sound like he knows what's coming, so whenever you do what he says to avoid what's coming, it won't sound like any...
So we've been over this a bunch, but Alex is entirely wrong about this prediction, and a hundred others that he's made about the invasion of Ukraine.
When Alex said we're looking at a big war in February, the actual context of that was his fear about China going to invade Taiwan, which is why the clip is edited down so short.
Also, after Russia invaded Ukraine, Alex said that Zelensky was on Putin's payroll and that Ukraine would stand down immediately, with the war being over within 48 hours.
He's been wrong since the start, and he's continued to be wrong, all while tooting his little horn about how he gets all this shit right.
On one level, it's kind of funny how someone who's so wrong all the time can't stop obsessing about how right he is all the time, but from a psychological perspective, it's pretty sad.
Alex is so desperate for validation that he has to lie about the things he said in order to make himself look right in hindsight.
I suspect he does this because the shit he says now is so crazy that it would be damn near impossible to get anyone hooked unless they're given constant admonitions to ignore their own instincts.
Your inner voice is telling you that this guy fake crying about demons is unwell and you should not listen to him.
But what about all the times he's magically predicted all these major world events?
Maybe your instincts are wrong.
Maybe you need to shut up with that inner voice telling you that this guy's nuts.
So if you're paying attention, Tucker has created an entirely fictitious prediction.
Alex didn't say that, but because of the manipulative way the clips are edited together, it makes it appear like Alex had all these thoughts strung together.
Tucker isn't an idiot, and he's been in media for a really long time, so I have zero belief that he takes this shit seriously at all.
He doesn't believe that Alex made this prediction or that it means anything, but this is part of a game and Tucker believes in that game.
Alex is part of a vanguard of voices who are pushing for the most extremely bigoted positions who retain the thinnest veneer of respectability.
Like you could get a more virulent extremist, racist type, but generally they're going to be people who you can't get away with interviewing.
Alex has just the, he's right on the cusp of like somehow you can get away.
Tucker is now part of a political project that's oriented toward re-establishing a brutally xenophobic country entirely ordered around cis-heterosexual white male Christian people maintaining a monopoly on power.
And Alex is an important part of pushing that Overton window.
For many years, people like Glenn Beck enjoyed a certain amount of cover because of Alex.
They could say the most insane shit, and when they're called out on it, they could say something like, it's not like I'm on Infowars.
Alex's existence as a clearly insane person in media allowed them to appear sane by comparison, which is a trick Tucker himself has used as recently as about a year ago.
The season has changed a little bit now, and figures like Tucker are now on a bit of a more offensive footing.
So instead of playing defense by throwing Alex under the bus, the move is to sanitize Alex to your audience so the extreme horrible shit he says appears less extreme than it actually is.
This shift in tactic is something that should be of pretty serious concern.
But from the standpoint of what I think Mark was saying with the I don't care if Alex is allowed back on Twitter or not is meaningless, I kind of agree with that.
Well, in the longer clips, it's a multi-hour show from July 25th, 2001.
I specifically walk through all the reasons.
And I knew they were hyping up that we were about to be hit by Osama Bin Laden.
I knew that the World Trade Center had been attacked the first time and that the Fed's been involved helping cook the bomb and allowing it to go forward.
And I just saw a lot of the pre-programming that was happening in the media as they were on the news saying, you know, well, life's about to change in America.
And I was reading what the RAND Corporation was saying and what the Pentagon was putting out.
And I read the PNAC document.
From a year before, Rebuilding America's Defenses, that Dick Cheney had helped write, and it said we need a Pearl Harbor event on the American homeland to be able to bring in this police state and this control and expand the American empire worldwide.
So hundreds of pieces of data went into that prediction.
The first is that Alex has been very clear on his show, as well as when he was on Rogan's show, that even though he claimed that he got that prediction from research, in reality it came to him in a prophetic dream.
I, from the time I was a child, and it only happens once every few years, will have a dream, I will tell people about the dream, vividly image it, and it will happen at a later date, a month, six months, a year later.
And a lot of people ask, how did I know about 9-1-1?
How did I get on the air?
Never done this before.
I said, call the White House, call Congress, tell them not to use bin Laden to attack New York as their patsy.
And I have the evidence, I have the information, but frankly, folks, I never said this on the air, I had a dream where I saw the towers hit.
You wonder why Alex won't just tell his buddy Tucker, who clearly has indicated that he believes there's a spiritual war going on, that he got his prediction from a prophetic dream, which is part of the skill set that God gave him so he could lead his forces against the devil.
Maybe it's too early in the interview for that, but I don't know.
It seems disingenuous for Alex not to tell his buddy the truth.
Now, leaving that aside, my other response is that Alex has completely forgotten the narrative from 2001.
In 2001, there were a couple of journalists who were able to get interviews with bin Laden, and the conspiracy community took serious notice of that.
How could these journalists get access to this guy who the U.S. intelligence agencies couldn't even seem to find?
It doesn't make sense.
In the context of multiple interviews being reported on from outlets in the Middle East, CNN made a big deal out of how their team were the first to conduct a TV interview with bin Laden in 1997 where he had declared war on America.
All this added up to a media rollout, according to people like Bill Cooper.
They were putting the boogeyman into the public's mind in advance of blaming him for a major act of terrorism.
That was the genesis of Cooper's prediction that he lays out pretty clearly on his show.
And this is where the beginnings of what led to Alex's, like, what his prediction was.
It's that there were interviews with Bin Laden and CNN was talking about it.
My most accurate prediction, going back over a decade, was when I read the Rockefeller Foundation, Operation Lockstep.
And they described using a virus to bring in world government, to bring in a world medical ID that they would then build the social credit score off of and that they would make people wear masks for fear, that they would shut down sporting events and things like that and basically phase in this new tyranny.
So I was also able to specifically...
Make that prediction over and over and over again because I was going off their own battle plans.
I don't think a lot of people do read them, but I do read them.
I mean, I'm currently reading MIT reports from their top councils, Pentagon reports.
They have a working group called the Mad Scientist Group at the Pentagon that works with MIT.
And if you go watch their hour-long, two-hour-long, three-hour-long meetings they have on YouTube with all the tops, I mean, we're talking hundreds of top scientists, they admit that they're building a post-human world.
That soon everyone's going to be mind-controlled, that they're going to put smart dust in our food that they can electromagnetically control, and they just lay it all out right there.
I'm not really making predictions in these high-level World Economic Forum and other large think tank groups.
They're laying out the future, and they're high priests at the World Economic Forum.
It's a consortium of all these groups.
You've all know Harari.
You can read his quotes.
The future's not human.
The human era is over.
The public is useless.
I mean, this is a very anti-human system, so that's how I'm able to make predictions, because they've given us a roadmap.
They tell us where they want to take us.
And so when the public wakes up, we push back on some of it, but they always come back.
And so I'm just following the trajectory of where they said they want to take us.
And there were a lot of white papers, not just the PNAC document from 2000, a year before 9/11, where they describe, we really need big terror attacks.
We really need Pearl Harbor events to get Americans to get up their rights.
This is complete horseshit he's laying out in front of Tucker because he knows that Tucker's enough of a worm to eat it.
Alex doesn't read high-level World Economic Forum documents.
He skims memes, and he makes shit up.
He has a couple of lines that he attributes to Yuval Noah Harari, but I know without a shred of a doubt that Alex has not even read the most elementary stuff Harari has released, like his book Sapiens and Homo Deus.
I know that because I've read Alex's stupid book The Great Reset, and multiple chapters in it are dedicated to out-of-context sentences from Harari's book that are just being used completely inappropriately, much in the way that someone who hasn't read his books would do.
At all about what he was exposing his audience to, he would ask for further details.
If Tucker is so blown away by Alex's seemingly superhuman prophecy powers and Alex is saying that it comes from reading these reports, shouldn't Tucker be at all curious what these reports are?
Shouldn't high-level World Economic Forum documents be way too vague?
You're a journalist, dick!
You're interviewing a guy!
Tucker doesn't ask any more details because he doesn't actually think Alex is a prophet.
He just wants the audience to.
He doesn't ask for more details because he's playing a game with Alex, and he doesn't want to make it too clear that Alex is an idiot liar, and he knows that there's no depth.
Ask for more details, and you'll get a five-minute diatribe that includes no details.
It's clear that Hezbollah and Hamas have tens of thousands of men and women as sleeper cells that are, quote...
Other than Mexican, the Border Patrol lists every month tens of thousands coming across the Texas and Arizona and California sectors.
And it's an easy equation to predict that there's a wide probability that Hezbollah and Hamas at some point are going to attack sports stadiums, they're going to attack colleges, they're going to attack synagogues, they're going to shoot up mass gatherings if they're given the order by Iran.
If we go to war with Iran, and then when this happens, our government won't get in trouble for dissolving the border and letting these people come in.
Just like on 9-11, our government clearly had prior knowledge.
There was clearly a major stand-down that went on, and the government got more power, more control, and now they're not pointing the homeland security apparatus at the Russians like they did in the Cold War.
The Islamists after 9-11, now they admit that their main focus is Christian conservatives and the bitter clingers and the people that live in rural America that, quote, white people, I mean, it says that in the report, are the main terror threat.
And so this whole apparatus of the war on terror has now been turned inwardly against the people, not just here but also in Europe.
Where if someone criticizes transgenderism in the UK, they come to their house and arrest them.
If a journalist does that, they come to their house and arrest them.
If somebody says, I think these surveillance cameras should start getting cut down, they come to their house and they arrest them for their free speech.
And so this is a global movement by the megacorporations, by the Black Rocks, and the state streets and the vanguards that control 80-plus percent of world wealth to control our behavior.
And Larry Fink of Black Rock has said that.
We're going to use our control over all this finance and this global social credit score rolling out to control people's behavior.
So that's really what this is.
And then they use the threat of global warming.
They use the threat of a virus.
They use the threat of radical Islam to take our rights.
You've committed no crime, you'd be in jail if you had is a painfully stupid thing to hear Tucker say.
He doesn't believe that shit for a second, but it's just another way to appeal to the audience that Alex has done no wrong.
He's a good man.
He's a good man people don't like for no reason.
Wow.
Now I can elucidate a little bit about why people don't like Alex, even just using the very interesting perspective he just shared with Tucker.
That clip jumps all over the place.
But the general theme is that Alex doesn't like that law enforcement agencies in the country recognize the dangers of white nationalism and white supremacist groups.
He thinks that Homeland Security should only be used to protect the homeland from non-white people, so he gets really offended when white groups are seen as terrorist threats, even when they do terrorist stuff.
That's a big part of why people don't like Alex.
He's a flagrant racist.
He's savvy enough to not use slurs on air, but the difference in the way he covers stories depending on the race of the subject is very glaring if you pay attention.
Beyond this trend, which we've covered in detail previously, Alex literally just repeats Yeah.
I know a lot of people think it's fun to pretend Alex isn't racist, but that's delusional and I have no time for it.
Keeping going with things that Alex touches on in that clip, he's also a vicious transphobe who would like to wield the power of the state to outlaw all LGBTQ existence in public and eventually in private.
He believes that gay people and trans people are mostly pedophiles trying to lure your children into a death cult, which is disgusting to preach.
In that clip, he says that in the UK you get arrested if you criticize trans people, which seems really strange considering that...
J.K. Rowling doesn't seem to be in jail.
The biggest transphobic person probably in media in the world?
He has no problem making things up when he needs to, generally because reality doesn't conform to his ridiculous bigot shit.
Also in that clip, Alex claims that there are tons of Hezbollah sleeper cell people in the country who have come over the border, which he has no evidence to back up.
However, promoting this mentality is a surefire way to build up anti-immigrant sentiment, which is one of Alex's big causes.
If you think that there are tons of Hezbollah sleeper cell agents walking among us, any person you suspect of being an immigrant from the Middle East could be a lethal threat to you and your family.
Promoting narratives like this are building blocks of Alex's aim of dehumanizing immigrant populations who he would like to expel from the country.
Also, people hate Alex because climate change is real and because COVID is real, and his actions probably led to a ton of unnecessary deaths during the pandemic, which Alex shamelessly tried to profit from.
promoting how evil all the masks are while selling a mask.
Claiming that his supplements could protect you from COVID.
It's a load of shit.
There's plenty more, but just from that clip there, these are some of the reasons people might hate Alex.
It's because he's a lying piece of shit whose primary influence on the world is inciting and exacerbating hate.
Because I do read their documents, and I do read their books, and we were effectively getting a lot of people in the military and the intelligence agencies.
Who were compartmentalized and who tuned into my show and saw my films and read my books and things.
And they clicked with it and said, wow, I see all this going on around me.
He's not lying about it.
And then I would give them other pieces that I discovered or my other guests discovered.
And so it was giving them an operational awareness outside of their compartmentalization.
And so we had massive success in the military, in the police.
And in the intelligence agencies, not just here, but around the world.
And so our penetration into those areas to help people expand their awareness that we're inside the government, inside corporations, was triggering a lot of whistleblowers, was triggering a lot of people not going along with the program.
And so really my sin was decompartmentalization of the population.
Well, that's where things get actually kind of interesting, because I think that there's some truth to what he's saying.
Now, granted, I don't think that there's any reason why the man hates him being explained here or anything like that.
But I do think he's touching on a dynamic that was real of his show, which was that he was pretty effective at radicalizing police officers and military.
I don't think that that is why the globalists hate him, or anything like that, because that's all in his head, but I think that he's at least pointing to something real as a cause for why his imaginary enemies hate him.
When Tim Cook admitted that he met on the weekend in August of 2017 with the other big tech heads and they made the decision to curate like it's a museum and take me off.
It was hundreds of platforms.
I mean, it wasn't just all the big ones.
It was everything from LinkedIn to our bank accounts being taken away to everything ensuing that week and over the next month.
And I knew that I was a test case.
And I wasn't taken off those platforms for any demonstrable reason.
It was the questioning the school shooting thing that came later.
They went and kind of dredged that up from my past.
Questioning it a few times.
Blew that up after I'd been deplatformed and said I was deplatformed for that.
If you check the record, I wasn't.
And so once they deplatformed me, it made the show in ways only get bigger with people actually going to InfoWars.com and finding me on local radio stations and things.
So then they panicked and said, okay, let's look at his record and create more of a reason that he's being taken off.
So they took things out of context from five, six years before, blew him up as a current thing out of context and deceptively reported on what I'd said.
To create a strawman argument to then facilitate the reason.
What's so crazy is if you asked just a cross-section of Americans who's responsible for the Sandy Hook massacre of kids at the school, no one remembers the name of the murderer.
It's fascinating, though, to hear Tucker repeat something that I've literally only heard Alex say, which is that no one knows Adam Lanza's name, and they just think Alex did Sandy Hook.
And it totally explains why this is the first time that Tucker has appeared anywhere with Alex in the five years since Alex got kicked off social media.
I mean, what goes on is the left forever called everybody a racist if you were just a conservative or pro-Second Amendment or pro-life.
Or were racist.
That didn't work anymore to call people racist.
And so the ADL gets all this big liberal donations.
And so they go out and then police and take people's sponsors.
And target them just by the ADL calling up sponsors, and sponsors get scared and drop.
And so that's what they've done to Elon Musk.
They took over 50% of Twitter's North American and European advertising in just the last year and bragged about it by saying he gives harbor to white supremacists, which he doesn't.
But at the same time...
White supremacists are ridiculous.
They're goofy.
Most of them are usually working for foundations that are basically actors.
We're not supposed to say that, but there's many cases of that actually being the case.
Whatever happened to the ACLU that used to support the KKK marching through a town or publishing through a newspaper?
I don't support the KKK.
I think they're a joke.
But if you take their rights, you're taking everybody's.
But they're not even taking the rights of those people to post.
Because they create fear and they get the ADL more funding.
But if they can target an Alex Jones or an Elon Musk or Tucker Carlson, then they're going after the real populist leaders that are bringing America together.
And so what the left wants is to divide us all according to race and to come out and say fundamentally with critical race theory that inherently being white is bad.
And teaching five-year-old white children that they're inherently bad because they're white.
So this is just kind of a bland episode of Alex's show at this point, which makes sense.
The goal here is to expose more people to Alex's shit and push the audience even further down the road to extremism, and the only way to do that is by presenting Alex as kind of a sensible person.
The way this interview could have been interesting is if Alex got wasted, like he did on Rogan, and then he put on a show, but he's trying to appeal to a different audience here, and they would likely be turned off by him.
Being drunk off his ass rambling about aliens.
Which is unfortunate, because this is just boring.
They know that on some level, so you create a thin veneer of respectability.
And then on the second level, I think that if you were just to be out and out, clear about what you're about, as someone like Tucker or Alex, I think that Tucker would run the risk of actually getting his show kicked off Twitter.
And teaching five-year-old white children they're inherently bad because they're white, that is wounding their brains and really creating racial division.
And when the majority were whites in the South in some areas, they played the race card for political power.
Now that the majority in most areas are not white, they're playing the good old-fashioned race card of...
Tell whites, you know, stand down, let people take over your society, your culture, give up your culture.
It's embarrassing to be white.
And then now it's flat out bad to be white.
And the left's trying to convert all these minority groups that are now the majority in most areas into race-based systems because that is a very effective system.
The reason they've done it is, most of the enforcers of this are white, liberal women, 45 or older, not fair, it's just a fact, and they're cupped husbands.
Apparently, Alex and Tucker don't believe you can express your belief that Black Lives Matter if you live in an area where they feel it's predominantly white.
The implication here is, of course, that these cushy white liberals who live in these cushy white areas only believe that black lives matter because they don't live in areas with higher black populations.
There's an underlying premise here that these imaginary white liberals would change their mind if they lived in East St. Louis and that their opposition to racism exists only because they don't live around a lot of black lives.
It's my favorite because it's such a great line of thinking, you know?
like, oh, the only reason you don't live by those people who I would never live nearby is because of the imaginary things that I think those people I've never met might do Right.
They don't exist, but they're characters that Alex has invented in his mind in order to invalidate opposition to racism.
To the point of how this is all in his imagination, no one is even saying that white populations are inherently evil.
This is a complete fabrication of Alex's imagination because he's emotionally threatened by conversations about how race and racism have shaped the modern world we currently inhabit.
He's intensely weak in his sense of self, so instead of engaging with the actual arguments and conversations that are being had, he has to create a fictional version of them to whine about where he's the victim.
Does he think that the legacy of slavery in the years of Yeah.
instead of just pretending everyone hates white people because they're white.
This is ridiculous.
It's childish shit that somehow is allowed to be taken seriously.
It needs to calm down and go away.
And it's being mixed with some, like, just generally and genuinely intensely racist ideas that are being expressed.
That is literally the most full-throated support of segregation I've heard publicly in a long time, which is why it's even crazier to me that we have to pretend like behaving like not getting drunk all the time is what's going to make Alex more palatable to people as opposed to just being like, hey, I'm going to be a little bit.
It's a mess.
I don't understand how...
Like, when people see a thing...
And then they tell me, like, oh, this is what people are going to think.
I am always wrong.
I am way wrong.
I'm way wrong because I hear that and I'm like, well, obviously people are going to go, look at these two weirdo white nationalist creepos living in the fucking Maine underneath them.
Well, they teach, as you know on their news, that we are going to have Chinese superiority.
We are the Chinese supremacist.
Xi Jinping admires Hitler.
He is literally following a race-based operation.
That is taking the world over, that owns the majority of Hollywood, that's paid off the Democratic Party.
And if you look at all these anti-white shows that you see funded in Hollywood, almost all of it has majority, literal communist Chinese government backing that is funding this.
So it's real simple.
China looks in and sees this diverse culture, and they say, we're going to use that to split the country up and balkanize it.
And that's what they've done.
And so communist China, along with the Southern Property Law Center, And the ADL and all these groups see America's weakness, and they're literally coming in saying white people are inherently bad because of the color of their skin.
organize all these other groups into race-based groups to then unify them under the Democratic Party to attack who is left that tends to be more conservative, and that is some white So, again, more weird anti-white fantasies out of Alex's imagination.
I'm going to go ahead and just wait for him to prove that China is making anti-white movies and TV shows in order to attack white people by making minority groups join the Democratic Party in order to fight white conservatives.
Something?
I don't know.
Very strange.
Also, small point, Alex is totally wrong about the UK's voting patterns.
White people overwhelmingly voted for conservatives, and the non-white people in the country mostly voted for labor.
Large cities mostly went for labor, like London, which is not 99% white, or whatever the fuck he's saying.
This is, again, Alex trying to make a very racist point, which is his belief that people who are anti-racist are only so because they don't live around non-white people.
This is flagrantly racist stuff that he's blaming on China or something.
No, I mean, it is so much like I look at people who live with In Harmony together and I say, ah, the only reason you guys do that is because you don't live next to each other.
And I say that because I don't live next to any of you.
If you live in a city, that's where all the white nationalists...
I mean, but I don't live there, so I won't go there.
So, the issue that we come to is that black people and Hispanic people are voting more for the GOP, and that's making the race baiters of the Democratic Party freak out.
Though they're panicking because more and more blacks are voting Republican, more and more Hispanics are voting Republican, they're starting to figure this out.
So now they're in panic mode to bring in totally disenfranchised third world populations who are refugees from the multi-year lockdowns in Africa, Latin America, and Asia and the Middle East.
They then bring them to UN camps, brainwash them.
Then bring them to our border, brainwash them more, then send them into the United States, and then literally hold them for years at facilities while they're indoctrinated to be this new political underclass that's then going to be turned loose on America.
And that's why you see Democrats giving illegal aliens the right to vote in their cities, giving them driver's license.
That's why you see them passing laws.
They can be police officers.
So they are importing A new enforcement class against the American people, and they're setting it up along racial lines, not us.
We'll get more into where his thought goes afterwards, but I just had to have a little bit of a break after that clip, because it's like, what Alex imagines is ridiculous.
The level of an operation they would need to brainwash immigrants for years in numbers that would sway elections is ridiculous.
I would throw out that it is impossible to imagine the words turn loose upon the American public while at the same time still including that they would have to then get very menial jobs like the rest of us.
All of this bullshit nonsense that he's throwing out is in service of that.
And when you consider the logistics of what he's just randomly throwing out, no evidence, just doop-doop-doop-doop, it's comical in its scale, the kind of project that he's discussing.
Well, I mean, Governor Abbott is, on a scale of 1 to 10, the best kind of Republican governor is a 10, and the worst is, say, a 1. And like the Illinois so-called Republicans, that's really a Democrat.
unidentified
I would put Greg Abbott as about a 5. He is a Democrat.
In fact, what the deep state fears would be a coalition of good governors, good attorney generals, giving them the findings and the rulings that they could indeed do that.
You know, because the first thing that I thought, the first thing I thought was the fun little, oh, did you know that Don't Mess With Texas was actually to help stop littering?
He wants people who are coming over the border to be terrorized in the ways that it has gone wrong when vigilantes have taken this shit upon themselves.
The central banks have unlimited money, but they can't buy all the infrastructure up because people aren't selling.
So they've got to crush us and make people so poor that everybody's forced to sell their business, their intellectual property, their physical property, but more importantly, to turn over our bodies to them.
O 'Biden right now is trying to ratify, would literally put our bodies under the control of the United Nations and our medical care policy under it.
So what this is, is really a breaking of our will, a demoralization.
That's what the transgenderism is, and two men can have a baby, and puberty blockers, and castrating little boys, and cutting little girls' breasts off.
They've got such hellish stuff coming in this designed global collapse to bring in their world government that they've got to just have all these horrors out there hoping we just throw up our hands and run off to the countryside, which everybody's doing, and in a way that's good.
But at the same time, then they've got full control.
So that's, I mean, you look at the White House press secretary.
Who can barely speak English, who's one of the stupidest people I've ever seen, and a transparent liar, you wouldn't hire her to run your copy machine.
She's the White House for a Secretary.
Why would you do that?
And it's not because of her race or who she sleeps with.
I think the whole point is she's so obviously repulsive that it makes you feel bad about the country to see her.
They've penetrated the cabinets, to quote Klaus Schwab.
They've put their operatives in to cut off our energy, demoralize us, release the hardened criminals, put the political activists in prison, continue to cut off the resources to make an angrier world.
Klaus Schwab says, we're going to make the world collapse.
We're going to have everybody turn against each other.
We're going to blame the political classes that we own and control.
And then when we're done, we'll bring in our new solution.
But first, they have to demolish.
The cultures and societies that we had before with the fentanyl, with the open borders, with the demoralization, and then they bring in their next phase, which is a high-tech, casual society, robot drone-controlled nightmare.
More than half of the U.S. in their official UN maps that they've had for more than 25 years.
They're in some of my first films.
Show half the U.S. off-limits to humans.
All cars left to have GPS.
Everybody, by law, left to have a cell phone at all times.
The big corporations want to get rid of the American idea.
You've got 50 acres and your house and a business and a farm and you can take care of your family and you're independent.
They have to destroy all that because the rest of the world aspires to that.
Instead, they want 15-minute cities, central bank digital currencies.
They want all of these systems that track and trace everything you do in the social.
Credit scores.
And the plan for the rest of the public, we're talking 99%, is 250 square foot coffin apartments, 5G bathing you in them, literally eating bug protein.
And I told people 10 years ago they're going to push bugs in the public because I read it in their white papers.
Now it's already in grocery stores all over the U.S., all over Europe.
I have to say, I bet there are, I don't know how long into this we are, 30 minutes or something, I bet there are a lot of people watching who are thinking, holy smokes, I can't believe I'm agreeing with Alex Jones.
Obviously, tricking people into agreeing with Alex is the primary function of this interview, so it's not surprising to hear Tucker attempting to restate the goal here.
But he asked where the lie was.
So from that last clip...
I'm going to list off the lies that jumped out to me.
Three, Alex is calling jail time for the people who planned the riot on January 6th, putting the political activists in prison, which is a dishonest framing.
Yeah, I mean, it is a very openly cynical, perhaps to a point of creating a black hole, insofar as just being like, none of what you say, like looking directly at the camera and saying, none of what he says means anything.
I mean, it is just like, don't force me to listen to Alex make noises if all you want is for him to be there and then you to point and then go, this good now.
So one of the things I find so striking about you, having watched you on and off over the years, and this must be a burden for you personally, but your ability to see people at a deeper level or to see things in them...
That are not obvious to the rest of us.
And I want to give a specific example.
So there's a guy called Brian Stelter who had the media show on CNN.
I first met Brian Stelter when he was a high school student or a first-year college student because he would hang around the show I worked on at the time at CNN.
This was 20 years ago at least.
And I always thought he was awkward and weird and probably had a super creepy personal life, but I never took him seriously.
There's a pretty famous clip, and I want to play it right now, of you critiquing Brian Stelter, and you take him way more seriously than I ever did, and I think you're right to.
Also, I don't like Tucker telling me this personal story about Brian Stelter as a young kid, and then years later on he's being a piece of shit to Brian Stelter then too?
They're having fun now, talking about it, because they're creating a scenario where they did have fun, which is not the scenario that actually went down.
Brian Stelter fucking made Alex pissed off by making a joke about how Alex doesn't have a show anymore before Alex could make a joke about how Stelter doesn't have a show anymore.
So they've rewritten this whole thing and now they can laugh about how actually we're the ones who are twice as clever and funny as everybody else.
And can you imagine just being home, minding your own business and then drunkenly Tucker's producer calls you and boop, it's Alex drunk on the other end of the line telling you that he wants to fuck you?
So this is all a load of shit, and the biggest part of it that's ridiculous is the idea that Stelter and Darcy were just constantly taking Alex's sponsors away.
Alex would get new sponsors, and they'd come along and muck it all up.
I don't care what these dudes say.
My patriot supply isn't going anywhere.
This is...
By design.
He knows that he says stuff that's going to anger people and people are going to be able to exert economic pressure.
That's why, from the beginning, before he decided he needed more money and wanted to branch out even larger, he had Genesis Communications Network that was run by Ted Anderson, who also ran Midas Resources.
Ted Anderson very explicitly laid it out that...
They were a one-talent business in terms of they had, what was it, Genesis Communications needed sponsors and Midas Resources needed to advertise.
And so they worked hand-in-glove with each other.
Alex had just that and the couple of weirdos like the limerick soap guy that would come in.
That was it.
They designed a system where public pressure could not...
To be clear, let's just reinforce what that means is that these two arch-capitalists have specifically gone out of their way to protect themselves from what capitalism would do to them if it were allowed to go unchecked.
So this is a real concern that other much more successful shows have to worry about.
Tucker had to deal with it on Fox, where there was a pressure campaign applied to get his sponsors to drop their support of his show, and Alex wants to get in on that by pretending that that was a worry he had as well.
The second thing there is that Alex is not...
Quite getting the reason that he was kicked off Twitter correct?
It may well have been that the time that he confronted Oliver Darcy was when getting kicked off happened, and it may even be the case that that was the last straw, but that wasn't the sole reason.
There were three primary reasons that Twitter's lawyer Vijaya Gade gave on Rogan for removing Alex from Twitter.
The first is that he'd received multiple strikes to his account for posting things like a video of a giant man punching an 11-year-old girl in the face.
He received other strikes for behavior that came up in the line of inciting harassment, it was right on that line, against individuals in his posts and on Periscope broadcasts, and the interaction with Oliver Darcy was possibly a tipping point in that.
This wasn't a political or journalistic confrontation that Alex made with Darcy, and the people at Twitter, I believe correctly, assessed it to be an act of targeted harassment.
Alex was doing this as a performance to incite further abuse and harassment to be directed at Darcy, which Twitter didn't feel like was an appropriate use of their site.
Alex can oversimplify this all he wants, but the truth is that when all the other companies kicked him off, Twitter didn't.
He had every chance to maintain his Twitter account, despite him being a loathsome piece of shit, and he couldn't even manage that.
At that time, there was a real feeling that Alex was trying to get himself kicked off Twitter, because this I've been silenced schtick doesn't really work well when people can just respond, you're still on Twitter.
At that point, being kicked off stuff was becoming to be seen as like a mark of valor for people in the extreme right wing as well, and Alex has been pretty zealous about making that his brand.
He got exactly what he wanted, and now he's complaining about getting it, which is ridiculous.
But, you know, he's a victim.
He's a victim of the forces that are aligned against him.
When you've committed no crime, you're like one of the only people in media who's not ginning up race hatred, I would say, just to be totally clear, because it's very common to do that.
You don't do that.
So anyway, and then, of course, this billion-dollar judgment against you for having naughty opinions, which is insane.
Alex absolutely has not been subpoenaed to four grand juries, and to the extent there have been any grand juries that he's been called to, it's to provide testimony.
They weren't trying to indict him.
This is all just a load of shit meant to convey the idea that Alex is a victim.
Everything is about downplaying Alex for Tucker.
He has to constantly say that Alex doesn't incite race hatred, which is definitely untrue.
Tucker is trying to reassure his audience that Alex isn't a racist, because there's a large percentage of his viewers who haven't come to terms with the fact that they love racists.
They're on their path there.
But they haven't quite gotten there yet.
Also, the Sandy Hook case has to be presented as being about Alex having naughty opinions, because presenting it as it really is would make Alex look really bad.
Tucker literally couldn't do this interview successfully if he took that case seriously, if he did the cursory research he's obligated to do and heard the experiences of the plaintiffs.
That case wasn't about Alex having naughty opinions.
It was about his concrete actions that caused family members of murder victims to be terrorized.
He was drunk on air when he was making the claims about them, so please, Tucker, show Alex as he is, not the construct you want to make him out to be.
This is pathetic, this childish level of, look at the fake version of this man that I want you to admire.
I really feel like that we should be smart enough to get past the whole...
Okay, how about this?
All right.
The idea of the trial is that on neutral playing field...
Facts and reality have sway, cannot be fought back against, and people without influence or bias, given the correct and accurate information, will make a good decision.
That's the idea of justice.
It's about as good as we got.
If all of that happens over the course of six years, Over the course of however many things.
Over all of this bullshit.
And at the end of all of that, those 12 people come back with one and a half billion fucking dollars.
Because sometimes your candidates might lose an election and you need a rationalization for why.
They actually won.
They secretly won, but it was stolen.
So every election is stolen from now on.
Every court case is rigged from now on because sometimes the people that you like lose cases, and you don't want to let that color the way that you look at them.
You don't want to have to deal with the fact that Alex is a giant piece of shit and did stuff that really caused serious drama to these people.
No, it was a rigged case.
unidentified
And they're just trying to punish him for having naughty opinions.
But there are the fishermen out there catching shrimp or whatever, and then all of a sudden here comes basically a tidal wave.
And if I was one of those fishermen, and I knew my children and my wife were on shore at school or work or whatever, And here comes a 40, 50-foot wave.
I know it's about to kill him.
I would not be thinking about myself watching this giant wave come in.
I'd go, oh, my God, my wife and kids are over there.
And so it's not that I'm a hero.
It's not even a selflessness.
I realized that I was just out in front and ahead of some people in understanding this because of family and research and just, you know, things in my life that I saw that encouraged me to get involved in the media.
Because I was aware of the globalists, some things that were going on, because my uncle was high-level, Iran-Contra, had some other family that worked in clandestine things.
So I kind of grew up just around folks that knew what was really going on.
It's fun that this interview just takes for granted now that Alex is right about the idiotic shit he says.
We just jumped to that.
So why isn't Alex saying what he normally does on his show?
Like, where are the shout-outs to the John Birch Society, who formed the basis for Alex's political ideology?
Where's the talk about God giving Alex a prophetic vision as a child that laid out the full-spectrum awareness of history in the world?
Where's the talk about periodic downloads from God over chicken-fried steak?
Alex doesn't get into that stuff because he knows what he's doing here.
That kind of talk would make him look insane to a new viewer and this interview is all about putting on the freshest, most respectable face possible for Alex to present to potential new viewers.
Crying about the devil and all that shit?
That's for initiated viewers.
To keep them interested and spiritually bully them into sending you more money.
It's a tool that has no use for new eyes, though.
So Tucker is just talking to this curated, watered-down version of Alex.
He's like a bad boy, school, drug addict bully who puts on a tie and gets a haircut to meet his new girlfriend.
It's ridiculous.
Anyone who knows the bully guy sees past the haircut.
Anybody who knows anything about Alex looks at this and is like, why is he not presenting himself as he is?
I imagine if I'm watching this in a way that I can respond to it that I'm already aware of Tucker and Alex.
And I've already made up my mind or anything, you know, like, I imagine somebody walking by the Scientology Center if they have nothing to, like, their shitty day, like, you know the stuff.
The whole stuff that makes you, when you walk by a Scientology Center and see a bright smiling face and somebody say, hi, can I help you?
That makes you go in, you know?
This has to be that kind of, like, going clear moment for so many people because you obviously don't join the Sea Org.
You know, you don't go straight from I had a bad day at work and my boss is an asshole to, like, yeah, slavery's fine.
If you put yourself in the shoes of somebody who really likes Tucker, and you have Tucker presenting this guy as a prophet, essentially, and that you should not trust your own instincts and anything you've heard about this guy, that might at least make you curious.
And if you get lucky and you go over to his show, maybe it's not one of the days where he fake cries and quits on air.
So no, I mean, I think that the credibility that Tucker is giving him by presenting him like this and saying the things he does about him and acting so blown away, I think that gets you on the boat.
Well, you know, we're told now we don't have children, it's bad for the earth.
And we're told all this, and Elon Musk is right, and is a hero for pointing out all the actuaries show, if you don't have 2.1 children, a man and a woman, people go, well, a man and a woman can have 2.1.
It's in the aggregate, folks, out of billions.
If a country doesn't have 2.1, 2.2 replacement rate...
Then you don't have people to take care of the old folks.
Society collapses.
And so Japan's 1.3.
Italy's 1.3.
They're done as cultures.
America, without immigrant influx, is about 1.6.
That's not viable.
And so...
And I'm not talking about white people only here, but white people are 7% of the world population.
But just to my previous question about, and without getting too personal, but like, I mean, I feel a little bit enervated and down just hearing your...
Hey, buddy, I don't want to talk about demographic stuff with you right now because I'm pretty sure this is going to get much more racist than I generally...
I specifically say, call the White House, tell them we know they're going to let al-Qaeda attack us, bin Laden, and then take our rights.
And I say, call the White House.
I put the number out, so I put the money where my mouth was.
And that's the only time I ever said, call the White House, and tell them stop a particular event.
I'm now saying we need to call the White House and say, you've let tens of thousands of military-age men of the Middle East in.
We know a lot of them are Hezbollah and Hamas.
The FBI has confirmed that.
And so, when and if there's big terror attacks, which I believe will probably happen, in America, we're not going to have Homeland Security to get more funds and more power and grope us at the airports more.
I want prison time for the agencies and groups that have allowed this.
There's no answer to Tucker's question about what effect this prophetic power has had on Alex over the years because it hasn't had any effect.
Alex doesn't actually think he has this gift, or at least to any extent that he does, it's a function of his delusions, and they're not delusions that he reflects on.
The whole Alex Jones was right about his predictions thing isn't real.
It's a marketing campaign, and it relies on out-of-context manipulatively edited short clips where Alex is actually wrong.
It's a game, and if you actually believe it, you're the mark in the scam.
Since Alex has no insight into how he's dealt with being a prophet, the only place he can really go is inside.
fighting against Democrats, apparently.
Also, for what it's worth, Alex is absolutely said to call the White House about a ton of shit.
He's pretending that he only said it once and it was about 9-11, so this new anti-immigrant talking point holds more weight.
But that's just another trick.
On May 5th, 2011, he told the audience to call the White House because the globalists were going to set off a dirty bomb.
On December 26th, 2012, he told the audience to call the White House because Obama stole the last election, which Alex claims he never has said, and the globalists are going to come take all the guns.
On August 5th, 2009, Alex told the audience to call the White House because the globalists were going to attack the public with a bioweapon, which turned out to be SARS, in basically a cold run of the narratives that he's now doing about COVID.
On November 12th, 2014, he told the audience to call the White House because the globalists were going to attack the public with a bioweapon, this time Ebola, trying to do that routine again.
Throughout that stretch in 2019, Alex was constantly telling the audience to call the White House to get Trump to pardon Roger Stone.
September 8th, 2009, Alex told the audience to call the White House to tell Obama to meet with Charlie Sheen.
The point is that Alex does this shit all the time, and he lies about not doing it to give whatever narrative he's covering at the moment undeserved weight.
He's a liar and a con man, running this con with expert assistance from Tucker.
I mean, Tucker could not be doing a better job of helping prop up Alex's scammy bullshit.
And you asked the question, this has really taken a toll on me, not the fake lawsuits, not the weaponization, not the platforming.
I was already getting exhausted five, six years ago.
And when I married my second wife, it was amazing.
I have three children with my previous wife, and they're all great children, and one with her.
We were in Hawaii getting married like seven years ago.
And I said to her, I said, I want to just write books and make documentary films and maybe do an occasional podcast.
At that time, I've been on air like 20, 22 years, six days a week, three hours a day at least.
I said, I just don't want this bird and this big crew.
I love the crew, but I don't want to do this anymore.
I said, I want to move the country, and I want to just, you know, because it's taking a physical toll to every day, look at this stuff.
And now I've gotten to the point, which even though I say don't let them break your will, don't let them demoralize you, that's because I understand the process.
It's happened to me.
Used to, I'd have hundreds of incredible stories and clips every day, and I couldn't wait to expose the bad guys.
Now I look at it once, I'm ready, I study it, and then half the time I get on air, And I just go, let's just take calls.
Or I start talking about some fun story just because I mentally cannot sit there and stare into the abyss.
I love the way he's presenting the current workflow, though, as being a result of not wanting to look into the abyss.
As opposed to, he's just gotten lazy, and he currently relies on narratives and talking points that require no actual preparation.
Underneath what he's talking about is bullshit.
He knows that, so why study the bullshit?
Just make up whatever you want.
Most of the time, Alex will just see a tweet posted by someone like Jack Posobiec and then yell about what he imagines the attached article says, and that's fine.
That's what his audience want.
And they don't expect more from him.
If Alex wanted to, he could sit down and do hard hitting shows about the evils of the globalists.
But that's too difficult.
The audience doesn't want depth anyway.
They just want the catharsis of watching an emotional outburst that includes the kind of bigotries that they enjoy and buzzwords that resonate with them.
And Alex provides that for them, so why try harder?
They have all this money, all this power, all this control.
So they're obsessed with finding life-intentioned technology, merging with machines, becoming gods.
That's their new religion.
That's the transhumanism.
And that's where all their funding goes.
But that's only one side of the coin.
The other side is that if you're going to be God, you've got to be in charge of death.
So because they fear death and they project their hatred of themselves onto us, then if they can poison us, dumb us down, sterilize us, depopulate us, they believe that's more for them at a very greedy level.
So they want to be death, the destroyer of worlds, to quote Aponow.
or I become Death Destroyer Worlds, and at the same time cheat death.
So it's a total subconscious obsession with death.
So, why isn't Alex explaining to Tucker that transdimensional beings told the globalists that they need to kill everyone off?
That's a really big part of Alex's worldview.
It's so weird that Alex doesn't bring up how the globalists want to kill everyone because that was part of their pact with the literal devil, and the people who they kill are sacrifices to feed the planet Saturn, which may or may not be a portal to hell.
Yeah, and even more so now because when you say that now we're having this conversation, we're listening to this interview, and when he says the one that we agree is the cleaned up version, that sounds way crazier to me than if he's just like, oh yeah, the devil made me do it.
I'm like, oh, thank God, the devil.
That at least doesn't make sense, right?
We can deal with stuff not making sense.
Whenever you try and make sense out of it, that's fucking insane!
So I'm going to jump around here a little bit because there's just long stretches where Alex is rambling and it's all just stuff we've talked about before.
So I'm going to jump here to the part where Alex is...
I mean, what it feels is the wrong amount of produced, though.
It's the wrong amount.
It's the amount of produced where somebody thought, hey, this is a good idea.
They remembered times people have done bits similar to this in the past, and they assumed, fuck it, I'll just do one of those without ever actually doing any of those legwork.
Also, Alex usually says Michelle Obama, but calls her Big Mike, and I think that maybe Alex isn't sure if that flies here, so he's going just with Gavin Newsom and Mike Pence.
So as we saw with JFK in 1963 in Dallas, they will go over.
And so we have governors declaring emergencies to take the guns.
All of that is, and suddenly Democrats are against sanctuary cities when they're the ones saying, Governor Hochul and the mayor of New York, come here, come here.
Now they're like, oh, we never said come here.
I think it's dawning on Democrats they've been betrayed.
And maybe there's some point where Democrats will have self-preservation, the average voter.
And say, no, we need to turn against this.
This is totalitarian.
This is dangerous.
This is evil.
But if that isn't the case, here's the problem.
Even if Democrats wake up, the system will know that from their internal polls.
The establishment will.
They're going to make a big move.
And is that a full-out war with Russia?
A full-out war with China?
Is it them allowing the jihadi sleeper cells?
They're in America that have poured across our border that are waiting to let them activate.
And I'm not saying our government controls them, but they've let other governments bring them in.
And they've given funding to those governments.
And now if we don't see strong signals against Iran, I don't want war with Iran.
What I'm saying is strong signals telling Iran, do not fund terror groups.
And if we don't see strong repudiation of Joe Biden, that will greenlight the security services.
To go ahead and let this new attack happen and a massive jihadi attack in America could be the way to bring in martial law and cancel the election.
So one of my favorite shows, Wife and I watch The Magicians.
Very plot-dense.
Extremely plot-dense to the point where if you kind of look away for about five, six seconds, you might look back and they'll be on a different show.
It's that level of plot-dense, right?
And sometimes when you're watching a new episode, they'll do the last time on and it won't be the strictly last time.
It will be...
Hey, here's a piece of the plot from last season.
We're in a different universe continuity now, but if you don't know that, if you don't remember it, you won't understand what's going on on this episode.
So, surprise, here it is.
Caught up.
Now we can watch the show.
I feel like I missed the last on for that entire section of just like, wait.
The sky is the limit, so people need to be vigilant and understand that we want to let the system know we're aware, we want to promote.
The values of free speech and of family and of self-defense and of local control and of free market, rugged individualism and a competitive civilization and a colorblind society that Martin Luther King Jr. talked about.
We need to go back to the things that made us great.
That threaten the CCP and threaten the globalists of the UN because they're selling tyranny and eating bugs and being locked down in your houses and forced injections and two men can have a baby.
We're selling normal human biology and success and culture.
And so I just think we have to give the alternate plan to their dystopia.
We have to challenge their dystopia but also give the alternate plan.
Which enough people aren't doing.
But Trump's big sin is his optimism.
America's great.
Everybody's beautiful.
We have such potential.
And as soon as the world heard America was open for business, we saw trillions flood instantly in.
Because our leaders had said America's not open for business.
Invest in China and India and Mexico, where the globalists have middleman deals to get all the money and all the power.
They said to him, the other auto manufacturers, they said, why are you going to pay your employees three times what we do?
And he said, because I don't want just rich people buying my cars.
I want my employees to prime the market to buy it.
They'll give me all the money back buying the Model T, and then that'll supercharge it.
So that's the two different systems.
Build this illustrious, incredibly exciting, roaring civilization of laissez-faire, or let these big guys that already made all the money centralize control, shut us all down and vertically integrate.
So they're in control and then kill competition.
So we have to kill the globalist program that's anti-free market, anti-capitalist.
It's monopolistic.
It's anti-human.
It's a bunch of degenerate, inbred, third, fourth generation elites who didn't make all this money, who didn't create all this stuff, but decided they don't even get to take part in it while they take part in it and live like kings.
So it's us or them, Tucker.
And we've got...
We've got to crush the globalists.
We've got to crush the New World Order.
We've got to challenge them, or they're going to destroy the planet.
All that shit is meaningless lip service, mostly just muscle memory buzzwords that Alex has memorized to compile into fake-ass rants.
Things sure went off the rails with the stuff about Trump and Henry Ford, but what I'm most interested in is the idea that Alex thinks he's helping propose an alternative system to the one that exists that's better.
Take any issue and imagine what Alex's policy prescription would be to address the problem he has, and you immediately end up with a pile of corpses.
Alex wants armed vigilantes to patrol the southern border and have the right to do whatever they need?
Alex wants to expel populations of people who he feels shouldn't be in America.
Alex doesn't believe that Muslims can possibly integrate into American society.
Alex thinks that people should be forced to carry fetuses to term against their own will.
Alex believes that LGBTQ folks don't have the right to exist in public and probably not in private.
Alex believes that public health officials should be killed for unleashing a bioweapon on the planet.
Alex doesn't have an alternative system.
He has a hit list.
Alex doesn't have a vision of a better future.
He has fantasies of an authoritarian state where all power rests in the hands of straight white Christian men, and that authority is never questioned.
Alex is complex in terms of his ability to wax on about nothing for long stretches of time, and he weaves in a lot of stupid sci-fi with his rants, but he's also pretty simple.
He wants a chauvinist Christian ethno state.
At the core, that's really what it boils down to.
Also, Henry Ford was a fucking Nazi.
And the whole story Alex is telling about him is a myth.
In reality Ford raised wages for his workers because he was dealing with massive turnover problems.
People kept quitting and the hiring and training processes that were needed to fill those positions over and over again was too expensive for him to maintain.
He raised wages to lure people into not quitting which was successful.
Also in order to get this raise employees had to submit to character assessments from Ford who would send people to their homes to make sure they weren't drinking or gambling.
In essence, Henry Ford enacted a social credit score with his employees, which is the very thing Alex is pretending the globalists are doing now, which is ironic.
Yeah, he just got caught up in his own little web.
He tried to be specific, which is always a mistake, because when he talks shit and he's like, I got two subpoenas last week, if he didn't give any specifics, he'd be able to maintain the illusion that that actually did happen.
But that example led to a big, you know, my mom's family raised Colonel Travis's son.
And on my dad's side, too, they were heavily involved.
First, Texas families.
We have, like, Mexican land grants for our property.
We still have Mexican land we paid for.
12 cents an acre, like 1825 in East Texas.
So it's not as cool as your place, but it's pretty cool.
And the last letter he wrote on that piece of wallpaper was to one of my great, great, great, great, great grandfathers in Gonzales, Texas, saying, please take care of my little boy.
But Travis knew he was going to die, but he was like, I got 10,000 troops coming in on our 200-something.
We're going to give them one hell of a fight.
And kill a bunch of them before they can get up north for the main battle.
And they killed thousands, 3,000, it's estimated, we go from memory, Mexican troops.
And so that'd be an honor to have like 10,000 troops coming to me and I'm in the Alamo.
I don't have a death wish, but man, it gets me high as a kite.
And so I'm not doing what Colonel Travis did.
The only reason they got beat is they ran out of ammo, basically.
They had powder, but no more ball.
And they were fighting with swords at the end.
So those are tough men, and I don't even measure up to them.
But I want to try to measure up.
And so it's very exciting.
It's instinctive.
It's spiritual to be defending humanity and prosperity.
Or pretending to.
It's as global as child-trafficking monsters, the open border, all this evil.
I mean, so my cells tell me to do this.
My guts, my sinews say, you're ordered to do this.
And I don't feel good unless I do it.
And so the bigger the attacks get, it's the old World War II saying when the planes were over the target, they didn't really have radar, but they knew the bases and the factories had flat.
So they're shooting at him with artillery, anti-aircraft artillery, so you flew into that.
And so me, the best place I want to be is in the flak, but I also hate the flak because we can blow up and we're not in the fight anymore.
So there's that paradox, but 90% of me wants to be in the flak, 10% says maybe you should steer a little around it because you don't want to get knocked out.
And until just a few years ago, I felt really bad because it didn't seem the paradigm had been shattered and people didn't actually read the globalist documents.
Now there's been a paradigm shattering and I'm almost obsolete, Tucker.
And as soon as that happens, as soon as I see another couple hundred more prominent people that actually know what's going on, we've already reached a chain reaction point, I'm going to hang it up and disappear like Obi-Wan Kenobi.
Yeah, but I really thought that there would be more work done to actually make the argument as opposed to just show a 40 second sizzle reel and then be like, oh my god, you're a prophet?
But also, I'm really interested in the raw footage.
I would be interested in that, because Alex, I believe, said it's a two-hour interview.
There's only an hour and a half.
There's very clearly cuts in it.
And so I'd be curious what those were, because we certainly have the legacy of his yay interview, where a week later there was a bunch of shit that came out that was pretty fucked up.