Conservatives are always going on and on about how we need a right to bear arms in case we have to revolt against a tyrannical government. Well, I think it's time we finally put that to the test. We might have to actually use the Second Amendment here and make sure this government works for us and take back the government for the people.

The Second Amendment is there to protect the First Amendment.

Exercise the Second Amendment, because if you don't exercise it openly and proudly, you lose it. And I've commended people that do wear firearms openly, which is legal and lawful in almost every state.

It's to defend against tyranny.

That's right. All types of arms.

The Second Amendment doesn't factor into this at all. No. It was armed police who stopped the shooter.

The very amendment that would have saved the lives of those children makes me sick to my damn stomach, man. These people need to realize we are not giving our gun rights up. We are not submitting ourselves to the New World Order. You know, people could go straight to hell, plain and simple. We are not going to give up our rights because people want to sue everything. You know what I mean? I want to protect my children and every children in the future of this country and prevent a school shooting to ever happen again. And to do that, we need to arm the schools, not disarm them. We need to protect our children with the Second Amendment.

You can call it an assault weapons ban. You can call it common sense gun legislation. I don't care what you call it. It's banning the Second Amendment. All of it. The violations against the First and Second Amendment in this country are out of control. And that's what it is. It is a violation. Let's stop playing word games and call it what it is. Shall not be infringed. So yes, banning assault weapons, whatever that means, is a violation of the Second Amendment. Absolutely. And then trying to write legislation to make that law... Is to effectively ban the Second Amendment.

I think it would go so far as to be evidence for them not actually believing witches are real and just using it as a cudgel to get through their other more important bullshit. Yeah, it's kind of a splitter that they can use to have their other agendas be more interesting than they would appear to be otherwise. Hey, I think Second Amendment rights are important. Cool. Hey, I think Second Amendment rights are important because witches are coming. Alright, I'm listening.

Well, you know, that's not what they meant back at that time. What they meant is you read the Second Amendment, they said never in the context of raising militias, people should have the right to bear arms.

Also, this Ninth Court ruling, it has said... If I recall correctly, let me pull up the exact wording of it. Quote, there is no right to carry arms openly in public, nor is any such right within the scope of the Second Amendment. Yeah. That's what the U.S. Court Judge Jay Bybee said.

The argument that he's making is that until 2008, there was not really an understanding that... Yeah. The Second Amendment wasn't about a well-ordered militia, and it was about your right to carry guns to everybody. Before that, the... And by the way, that was a 5-4 decision with a very contentious... The contentious Supreme Court that stole an election? Who would have guessed that they would pull this bullshit? Yeah, it was not like a, oh yeah, across the board, the Supreme Court, everyone agrees. And before that, the Second Amendment was more or less understood. The historical context is being that the states had a right to keep a militia in case one of the other states attacked them or the federal government attacked them.

Right, and the thing is, interpretations that have been done by even the Supreme Court about the Second Amendment have said clearly that the Second Amendment does allow for... Some regulation that could happen.

The Second Amendment isn't there for duck hunting. It's there to protect us from tyrannical government and street thugs.