Today, Dan and Jordan dip back to last week to see how Infowars covered the Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs. Alex is out of studio, so Owen Shroyer handles hosting duties, and does a bad job all around. Also, Alex is definitely not mad about Elon Musk not letting him back on Twitter. Citations
There's just, like, Cocoa Puffs, and then I guess the Captain Crunch pieces are, like, sort of caramel-ish, but they're not really, and I realized as I was eating it, if this was more caramel, it would be worse.
So some people texted me that Jordan Peele, being Jordan Peele fame, the quality of all the stuff he's worked, he put out a show called Quiet Part Loud.
Is, because I didn't even think about this, but somebody texted me that, and then the other, no, two days ago, the thought occurred to me like, oh, oh, there had to have been people who accidentally found my book, based upon that.
What's funny to me about it, all right, is that I didn't pay for the analytics on the Squarespace or whatever, but it does show you if there's been a huge bump in traffic or not.
Yeah, so he took another vacation, was out of studio all week, and left Owen Troyer in charge of the ship.
And so that made things a little bit tough.
And now we arrive back here on Monday's episode, and Alex has still been out of studio, and And I decided that what we should do is go back and look at a little bit of the stuff that happened over the course of the, especially the beginning of the week.
And see the response to the Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs.
I feel like that is worth touching on and seeing how they covered it.
Even though it wasn't Alex himself, it was Owen Troyer who was leading the charge in the studio.
And so, yeah, that's what we're going to look at here.
We're going to talk a bit about November 20th and 21st.
We don't talk a lot about Owen, and the reason that I find him to be unpalatable to listen to, I think he sucks, I think he's bad, and I also think that he's kind of a knockoff.
Alex, he's doing a shoddy imitation of this person, and he doesn't understand what makes Alex compelling as an orator or as somebody who's speaking.
He lacks those things that make Alex fascinating.
There's a chaoticness to Alex, there's a confidence, there's an unpredictability that make, when he's saying things like, someone brought in donuts, stop it!
Ladies and gentlemen, here we are on this Sunday, November 20th, 2022.
An incredible time, a historic time in American history and in world history as the future of humanity is on the precipice.
And will either fall into a corporate, global tyranny with endless digital bureaucracy, soulless, faceless, spiritless, that you're trapped in forever.
A government intervening in every breath you take and every step you make.
This is what we must stand against because we are not slaves.
It was either, there was a Kyle Kinane, there was a Mitch Hedberg, there was like, yeah, yeah, yeah, there were all those people who were starting out who were just doing impressions of, and everybody starts out.
So, on the evening of November 19th, a 22-year-old named Anderson Aldrich entered Club Q, an LGBTQ club in Colorado Springs, and opened fire.
They killed five people and 25 others were injured in the attack.
This story is first and foremost a tragedy, and another sign of the rising tide of anti-LGBTQ violence, in no small part facilitated and encouraged by modern right-wing media that accuses all members of that community of being pedophiles who are out to groom your children.
Alex and everyone at InfoWars is complicit in that trend, and the natural endpoint of promoting and normalizing that mentality is that some people who internalize it and accept it as truth may be inspired to take matters into their own hands.
Beyond being a tragedy, this case is also a complete fucking mess.
The accused shooter Aldrich is the grandson of a right-wing California politician who supported the January 6th riots and is the son of a very homophobic former porn star who went by the name Dick Delaware, who also appeared on an episode of Intervention because he was addicted to meth.
To complicate matters even further, Aldrich lawyers have claimed that Aldrich is non-binary and wants to be referred to with they-them pronouns, which has caused a lot of varying reactions from people.
The prevailing attitude people seem to have is that this is a ploy to dodge potential hate crime penalties in the case since they'd never spoken about this prior and they were known to routinely use anti-LGBTQ slurs.
People were very shocked to see an interview with their dad where he expressed his surprise hearing his son was involved in an incident at a gay bar, not because five people were murdered, but because he was concerned that his son was gay.
It's really awful to see, but in the interview, he also says that he hasn't been in Aldrich's life for over a decade, and he doesn't come off as a very sober interview subject.
Even though he hasn't been in his son's life, he does say that he raised his child to know that being gay is wrong, and that fighting is the answer to conflict.
He seems like a shit influence, even though he's very clear that he's talking about hand-to-hand Good distinction.
On top of all this, Aldrich's mother called the police after Aldrich made a bomb threat targeted at her, but as is too often the case, charges weren't pressed, and Aldrich was able to keep his guns.
I do believe that Aldrich could have made that bomb threat, but also, the mom is not a great source of information either.
From an article in CNN.
In 2009, Aldrich's mother received three years of probation for convictions of public intoxication and falsely reporting a crime to the police.
The false report conviction stemmed from a 2008 incident in Maretta, California, in which police responded to a reported home invasion and found Vopal lying on her bed with her hands and legs bound with duct tape.
Vopelt initially told the police a man had put string around her neck, bound her with tape, and placed a knife on her chest.
She admitted the following day, however, that she had been under the influence of narcotics and fabricated the incident because, quote, she was lonely and wanted attention, a police report states.
All of this just completely makes me feel ill, and at the end of the day, I feel terrible for what Aldrich clearly had to live with growing up, but that doesn't really matter anymore.
People who have had more difficult I just want to send all the love and support I can to the survivors and friends and families of those lost in Colorado Springs, as well as all of our LGBTQ family.
Anyway...
It was somewhat convenient that Alex was out of studio last week, because that meant that we didn't have to talk about his coverage of the shooting.
But I think that it's actually important to loop back and take a look at this.
My reasoning takes into account a few things.
The first is that it's relevant to understand Infowars' angle on this story.
The second is something that I thought was a little bit more compelling, which is that the right-wing media's coverage of this attack has been indefensible, in a way that I think does feel a lot different for a lot of folks than other times in the past.
For instance, Tim Pool took to Twitter to rationalize the shooting as the natural reaction to the idea that Club Q had a, quote, grooming event, which is the way he characterized a drag brunch the club was hosting.
He had a sickening take that legislation needed to be passed and police needed to stop events like all-age drag brunches from happening, but because that wasn't happening, it only makes sense that people would try to solve the problem with violence.
In this clip where he's trying to be like a piece of shit troll, I noticed that he slipped a little bit.
Now, he's just trolling as a whole with this question that he's presenting.
It's not a sincere question, but see if you can notice where he slips up a little bit.
A bunch of goddamn pedophiles are grooming children, and when we're like, hey, stop associating all LGBT people with groomers, y 'all keep fucking doing it!
So here's what happened.
I tweeted.
If you claim that groomer refers to all LGBT people, then you are calling all LGBT people groomers and you are inciting violence against them.
For one, he knows damn well that right-wing figures use the term groomer as a catch-all for their anti-LGBTQ bigotry.
It's a cute game he's playing here, but in order to take it seriously, you'd have to imagine that Tim has never talked to or listened to any of the people who come onto his show as guests.
The slip-up I was talking about is that he says LGBTQ.
He says that because he hangs out with a community of people who use that term to imply that pedophiles are an inherent part of and distinct group within the LGBTQ community.
It's a hard slip-up to make, too, because it requires him to pronounce the P sound twice in a row, which he did to say LGBTQ people.
Matt Walsh is another figure that has decided to dip his toes into the waters of justifying mass murder because of his own prejudice.
He put out a video on YouTube where he said, quote, Is it that hard to not cross-dress in front of kids?
Is the compulsion that overwhelming?
If it's causing this much chaos and violence, why do you insist on continuing to do it?
The trend among these figures is that they've decided to push the idea that the shooting, while probably unfortunate, is justifiable because drag brunches exist.
They paint the picture that the drag brunch is what's causing the violence, and if these LGBTQ folks would just agree to exist in the constrictive boundaries that the right-wing extremist figures in the media demand, then the violence would stop.
This behavior is legitimately very difficult for me to distinguish from making veiled terrorist threats.
It's all bullshit.
It's not even a sincere point that someone like Matt Walsh is making, and it all makes me completely sick.
The types of reactions that we see from these ostensibly more mainstream figures are the sort of things you'd usually normally just hear in places like InfoWars, but now Daily Wire pundits and Tucker Carlson are walking all the way up to the InfoWars line and debatably crossing it.
As such, I felt it would be helpful to accurately get a sense of what InfoWars coverage consisted of in the aftermath.
This episode that we're going to be covering here, it starts with November 20th, the day after the shooting, when Owen was filling in for Alex.
This is a Sunday show, so it begins at 4 p.m. Central, which means there's no reason for them not to be aware of a lot of the primary details by the time Owen gets on air.
By their own logic, then it's fine to murder them.
Like, I don't even know how you can say that without recognizing that if you are yourself the cause of violence, then LGBTQ people can murder you based upon your own dumb fucking argument.
It's just a deflection from taking any kind of stock of the kind of rhetoric that you are engaged in putting out into the world and the consequences that it can have.
And I say that, and I mean, you know, four years ago, I think I'm on your team, and now I don't think that what they say matters beyond if you say it, then you said it.
The end.
I don't care if they are genuine about it or not.
I don't think it matters.
And I think they are clearly, clearly the people who want to say that shit and then whenever somebody challenges them, walk it back as I wasn't being serious or I wasn't being serious.
We've got Alex Stein joining us in about 30 minutes.
And, I mean, this guy just doesn't stop with the hits.
And he's outside of a library where they're doing a little drag queen story, child abuse for kids.
And it's just so classic how these children behave.
And then we're supposed to treat them like adults as they're out here.
Under no thought of their own, this is not an act of their own volition, to stand for trans kid surgeries and gay kids and all the other bull crap that they claim to stand for.
But he's leading the show talking about how he's having Alex Stein on because he has a video that he put out where he went and was being a dick at Drag Queen Storytime.
And you can hear in there Owen engaging in the exact sort of demonization campaign that the right is just characterized by at this point.
By the way, they got their nice rifles that Joe Biden wants to ban.
Yeah.
Yeah, they've got that going too for them now.
So we'll be discussing that, playing that video with Alex and getting a little more into that story where more and more every day gay Americans are saying, hey, wait a second.
You're not going to use...
You're not going to use us as a means to get access to children.
You're not going to say LGBTQ pride and wave a pride flag and then say, now let me get naked and dance in front of your child.
It's LGBT.
And so they're showing up at city council meetings, school board meetings, the Gays Against Groomers is becoming a larger group.
So there is the pushback.
So we're going to do at least two segments.
If we're having a good time, maybe we'll extend that with Alex Stein.
I mean, the idea that they would arm themselves to protect themselves...
Has not yet sunk in to the right wing.
So people have guns there, meaning they're there to protect against other groomers showing up, as opposed to to protect those people inside from you fucks.
Well, I mean, even if you take the shooting in Colorado Springs away from it, because to be fully fair...
At the time that we're recording this episode, I don't think we know enough about a full motive or anything.
You can make some pretty...
decent assumptions based on available information, but there is still a little bit of a leaping to a conclusion about the precise motive.
But even leaving that aside, even if you don't want to get tangled up in that, you can still say that Proud Boys are showing up and disrupting aggressively drag queen story times in various parts of the country, a lot of times armed, yelling about how there's pedophiles grooming children in here.
And the idea of armed security in response to That is even understandable.
Even if there hadn't been a shooting, it would make total sense.
It's almost like just sort of punting on talking about the elephant in the room while still covering these topics that are adjacent to the subject, which I find to be not the tip of the spear.
So, you can see here, as Owen begins to bring up the story of the shooting, in the space of 24 seconds, he implants three separate suggestions to distract the audience from the possibility that this was a mass shooting directed at a community that his show and his employer target routinely with ridiculous slander and accusations.
First, Owen couches the conversation in terms of discussing the liberal media's response to the shooting, because that's more fertile territory for him.
He doesn't have the chops to actually discuss the shooting itself, but yelling a bunch of dumb shit about random tweets he saw is basically the same thing on InfoWars.
Second, Owen says that this was a, quote, supposed gay club.
He knows that if the target of a mass shooting was a gay club, there's a high likelihood that a potential motive is homophobia or transphobia, which are the primary drivers of Infowars content.
In order to create distance in the audience's mind between the possible motive for the shooting and the rhetoric they hear every day, Owen tries to subtly suggest that it's not actually a gay bar.
If Owen wanted to do a tiny bit of research, he could have found their website and seen that instead of serving aioli fries, they have gayoli fries on their menu, which is a subtle hint.
Very subtle.
He could have checked out their drink menu and seen that, quote, cock shots are on the menu, which are described as, quote, jello shots dispensed through a white or brown cock-shaped syringe.
The Wayback Machine has snapshots of their site going back to 2004, where they're described as, quote, the premier gay restaurant and nightclub.
Their phone number is 571-GAY.
I say this with nothing but love and respect.
This is not a supposed gay club.
It's in Owen's interest to muddy the waters, though, so he throws that in to plant seeds of suspicion in the listener.
And actually, this is more important than it may seem.
An article about Club Q was published in the Colorado Springs Indy in July 2020 with the headline, quote, Colorado Springs' last remaining gay bar, Club Q, changes with the times.
That article is a fascinating tale of the queer history of Colorado Springs and how it went from a severely anti-LGBTQ environment in the 90s to a town with a vibrant community and a bunch of gay bars to this point in 2020 where there was just this one gay bar left in town because, as technology advanced, you didn't need to have a specific LGBTQ bar for people to meet up.
They could use apps and online dating.
So many of the other bars became, quote, gay-friendly.
But Club Q, their co-owner, Nick Greska, told the indie about a former bar they worked at, quote, when people would call us and ask if we were a gay bar, I was instructed to say we were a gay friendly bar, not an explicitly gay bar.
But that's not enough.
Club Q was supposed to be explicitly gay, and as Greska put it, The whole idea of this place was to have a safe place, to get a permanent one in the city.
This is the place that Owen is suggesting is maybe not actually a gay bar, because he's an idiot who just talks shit and he doesn't know anything about the subjects he covers.
The third thing he does is he gets all weird about the club being called Club Q, which he totally isn't saying has anything to do with QAnon stuff.
Totally not.
He's doing this because the audience is trying to associate things that are connected to the Q folks to be a globalist psyop.
So that was one of the main defenses that Alex deployed about why January 6th wasn't actually the Patriots' fault.
Yeah, Owen's doing this to wink at the audience that maybe they should think that it's a globalist psyop.
Again, the club was named Club Q since at least 2004, so unless QAnon has been going on since...
Yeah, absolutely.
Anyway, as you can tell, right out of the gate, Owen is invested in throwing out distractions to get away from the heart of the issue, and I think that it's pretty fucking obvious why.
Yeah, and this is one of the reasons that I find that argument about the shooter's identity or whatever about it in regards to the heinousness of the crime being a hate crime.
If you are attacking a place that's explicitly safe, For gay people, then it is by nature an explicitly homophobic crime.
Right, and in that regards, it is entirely possible.
I believe it's entirely possible for this person to have not listened to a single word that Tucker Carlson or Alex Jones have said.
I mean, it's entirely possible that this is unrelated to the larger global rhetoric around this circumstance, and it could be very personal, but the attack itself tells you what the...
Yeah, and it seems unlikely from a lot of surrounding context that it doesn't exist within the larger context of so much of this right-wing media, whether it be on social media or these people's actual shows.
But to the extent that there is a clear connection...
And so again, the response from the Democrat Party, the response from the liberal mainstream media should not surprise us, but it does remind us just how sick and twisted they really are, doesn't it?
Now we all know why they're making...
The big deal of this shooting, because they can politicize it, blame it on their opposition, and then once again, in an emotional outcry, say, we have to ban guns, we have to end the Second Amendment.
But look, I can play this game every day.
You understand?
I can play this game every Monday, and I've been doing it more often now, just as an exhibition on how you could play this game.
unidentified
But I mean, you know, just look at these stories.
Two injured from two overnight shootings in Baltimore.
Owen isn't arguing for anything political or even productive.
At the core, he's saying that people shouldn't care about the Club Q shooting.
That's the point of this presentation.
He's pushing back against people caring about a mass shooting at a gay bar where five people were killed, and many more would have been if the shooter hadn't been beaten up by brave bar patrons.
Obviously, other shootings are tragic as well, and they are all indicative of problems that we need to address.
The issue comes down to these not being analogous situations, and because of that, the game Owen thinks he's playing is actually meaningless, and he doesn't care about those other shootings.
Even if this person, Owen, at one point had some sort of ability to connect empathetically to a story, by virtue of this as your job, as your imperative, and as the social group that he surrounds himself with, all murders are nothing to him.
Well, I mean, we live in Chicago, and we can talk about the gun violence in Chicago all we want, but what Owen is talking about is gun violence towards genocide and trying to act like that is equivalent to...
People like Owen and Alex Stein have a political ideology that says that they should support armed citizens practicing the Second Amendment.
Even if they disagree with the concept of drag queen story time, it should be antithetical to their gun absolutism to mock people for...
I mean, they care about guns and they want them, but they want what they represent more.
They want the ability to impose mortal fear in political enemies and couch it in a philosophical love for the Constitution.
For instance, they want folks, their team, to be armed to the teeth when they go to protest at a reproductive health clinic so the people seeking care or the clinic staff are terrified.
Or if there are protests in the wake of the killing of George Floyd, they want people on their side to be armed and wandering around acting as vigilantes.
That is good for them.
Conversely, they don't want principled gun owners to protect the targets.
They mock carrying guns here when the people are outside of Drag Queen Storytime or if armed citizens were to post up at an abortion clinic.
They don't want guns in these contexts because of what those guns represent, which is that vulnerable communities may not be as vulnerable as you want them to be.
It's incredibly distasteful for them to be playing this the day after the shooting.
Alex Stein is just mocking the idea of armed citizens protecting a drag queen's storytime, which is the exact type of event that people like Tim Pool and Matt Walsh would go on to use as a justification for why the shooting maybe wasn't so bad.
Also, Stein is just really bad at this.
He strikes me as the kid in like a high school play who's overacting.
He's hamming it up a little bit too much because he knows that no one would pay attention to him if he reeled it in and was subtle because he doesn't have a.
I think what he doesn't understand, because he's fucking stupid along with the rest of them, is that what he's essentially saying is that...
All of the horrible fucking murders were committed by us.
Because if you are insistently belittling the concept of your ideological opponent having guns, and in fact, having all of them be squirt guns, then you are actually insisting that the only people who murder people are the fucking conservatives, you fucking morons!
If I'm an actor on a show and the writer's like, hey, we've got a whole thing where we're eliminating a bunch of people, I'm like, shit, I hope I don't find out that they didn't need me.
You know, as a fan of history, I particularly, you know, I used to do the bit about Andrew Jackson and dual culture, you know, that kind of dual culture.
And in thinking about that, you know, I've always kept it within the point of view of the people within the dual and their social circle and how they react to that.
But what I forgot, or at least what I overlooked, I'm just now realizing, is what it must have been like for just a regular poor person to suddenly...
in the paper, you know, like fucking Alexander Hamilton dead, you know, and be like, all right, Like, if Elon Musk and Alex Jones had a duel, it didn't occur to me that we would all get to be like, hey, Elon's dead.
And then he quoted a Bible verse, and Alex is taking that to mean that Elon Musk is saying that he's going to put a millstone around Alex's neck and throw him in the ocean.
He's a provocateur and likes to play both sides of every issue.
And overall, I think he's done some good things.
He's also done some very troubling things.
But coming up next segment, I am going to really expose what's behind all this and what's really happening at Twitter and the wider war of censorship that is taking place that really only Infowars and a few people like Tucker Carlson have fully grasped.
what's actually happening.
This is being run by intelligence agencies and the Justice Department illegally.
They're having congressional hearings about it.
It's all come out.
I was the first to tell you about it decades ago.
But now it's been radically expanded.
And these direct scripts are being written and prepared and then given to PR firms.
You know, I mean, in his world, though, it is like, look at the world we live in now, and this is a fucked up event, and unfortunately the news cycle is going to move on.
And as much as we make fun of Alex for being a fucking non-serialized show, unfortunately, all too often, we live in a non-serialized show in this regard.
And so I can see why he'd be like, hey, fuck it, I bet I can get away with not talking about this at all.
Because fuck it, I got Tim Pool and Tucker Carlson and all these motherfuckers out here.
Thank you for joining us on this live Monday, November 21st.
2022 broadcast.
I am your host, Alex Jones.
I'm about to exclusively respond to some of the over-the-top statements against me by Elon Musk yesterday and today.
And the fact that the vast majority of even leftist-controlled, infested Twitter has really woken up to what's happening and has saw right through to what Elon Musk and the establishment is doing.
I don't think that most people on the left were ever that thrilled with what Elon was up to with Twitter.
I don't know what kind of charade Alex is trying to pull here.
The entire first segment of this show is Alex shilling his supplements and book, desperately begging for money.
And now, the second segment is clearly just Alex complaining about Elon Musk.
This is an important dynamic to understand for a few reasons.
The first is that Alex really can't disappear for too long, because no one else moves product at nearly the rate he does.
If he wants to take time off, he does kind of need to pop in and do shit like this to reassure the audience that he's still there, and remind them that they need to give money to the cult leader.
You got it.
The second is that from a content perspective, the Club Q shooting is not relevant enough.
For Alex to address on the show in the limited time that he has to appear while he's on vacation.
However, what's super important for him to talk about is that Elon Musk mentioned him on Twitter.
He's not a competent talk show host, but he's amazing at wrangling attention.
He's done it since the VHS and Bullhorn days, and now the technology and social media has evolved.
This is that equivalent.
With Elon saying that Alex isn't going to be let back on Twitter, Alex knows that he has an opportunity to get some attention, but it requires him responding to keep the image of a fight alive and the window is short.
He needs to...
You know, get in there now.
Because him responding when he gets back from vacation, no one's going to give a shit, and he's going to look weak.
Self-aggrandizing drama is what Alex is most interested in, and Alex probably should have known that Elon felt this way about him if all the other stories that he tells are true at all.
Alex has very strongly implied that he's gone to dinner with Musk because of the Rogan connection.
Alex has talked about how Joe has told him that Elon loves him and all this, but now that Musk has come out and publicly said that Alex is a piece of shit, Yeah.
that he's not personally invested and then come out and release new tweets last night saying Alex Jones the terrible person our shows made money off Sandy Hook Alex Jones wouldn't hurt these children none of that's true I just think this is sad.
"Musk is trying to take over Twitter to create what he calls Internet X that goes back to where the Internet was freer and more open.
Still doesn't mean it'll be perfect.
He understands that the censorship is just killing interaction, killing debate and making it a horrible experience and he just wants to make it successful.
That's a common sense and smart thing to do just from a business perspective.
It's what made America great.
And the Southern Poverty Law Center, the Democratic Party, the European Union, and the Justice Department and CIA moles that Congress had hearings on last week are inside of his company right now and are literally trying to sabotage it, not just externally with threats of lawsuits and censorship and criminal charges from the EU, but they're also threatening to sabotage the company and the actual systems that make it operate.
So what he had an exodus out of the company.
It was worse than he thought.
There's questions that Twitter is even going to survive.
He hit the panic button and basically came out and attacked me so that he can get the left off of his back.
And you know, it's fine to me that he did that, except he went too far and compared himself to Jesus and the whole bring the children to me, suffer the children to me.
Also, I would say that if there are moles involved, I know of one person that you need to call to take care of this, and that is Anderson Cooper, the original host of the mole.
All Musk did was quote a Bible verse, which if you compare that with Alex's grandiose stories about how God selected him to fight the literal devil, it doesn't really seem like that big of a deal.
The corrupt war on free speech has been directed by these big corporations, and the perfect example of this is the NBA not allowing any criticism by their players or any criticism by the fans of Communist China and the Uyghurs and all the rest of it.
Literal death camps and a major NBA owner, remember?
So when you talk about people in slave camps and death camps having their organs harvested and worked to death at Apple Foxconn laboratories, that's okay because it's just Tim Cook's gay and he wears a turtleneck and talks effeminately.
But when Alex Jones questions a mass shooting when the rest of the Internet does, why, it is the ultimate crime in history and now all populists need their free speech taken and need to be punished.
Heading up this whole global move to censor is the ADL.
They're censoring in Europe.
They're censoring in Australia.
They're censoring in Canada.
They're censoring here in the United States.
They decide who to get censored.
And now Albert Bourla last week got an award from the ADL for fighting hate.
And they said that anyone, anyone, at any time, that questions in any way.
Any of the shots or if they're effective or anything is a criminal, is an agent of evil, he said, and needs to be censored and debanked and taken off the internet.
And that's really the big story we're talking about here right now.
I'd be interested to hear how Alex squares his position about the NBA with his opposition to NFL players taking a knee as a silent protest against police brutality.
This is also just a talking point from 2019 that Alex is pulling out of his ass to defend himself because he really doesn't have an actual defense for his actions other than to flail and distract.
Albert Borla is the head of Pfizer, and on November 10th, he was given the ADL's Courage Against Hate Award.
Also, a past recipient of that, Hamdi Ulukaya, head of Chobani, sued Alex.
The reason he got this award had to do with, well, I'll just quote his acceptance speech here.
Quote, anti-Semitic messages on message boards and on On flyers posted in communities across the country suggesting that the coronavirus was a tool for Jews to expand the global influence, that Jews were profiting from COVID, and that Jews were the real virus.
Hate peddlers referred to the Jew vaccine to dissuade others from receiving it.
Some messages even referred to my own Jewish heritage and used it as evidence that the widespread vaccine effort was part of a calculated long-term Jewish plot to institute a global Jew government.
It makes sense why Borla got this award, given the context of everything, and while it's fair to agree or disagree with some of the points that he makes in his speech, he didn't say any of the things Alex is claiming.
Alex probably only knows about this speech and this award at all because of this line.
Quote, now there are bright spots amid this darkness.
Just last month, a jury awarded close to a billion dollars to families of those who lost loved ones in the Sandy Hook massacre because one man with a microphone spoke disgusting and disgraceful lies.
The jury flat out rejected his lies and made an unambiguous statement that such evil is not acceptable.
That got an applause break from the audience, and Alex is probably just a little pissed off that he didn't actually get a name check in speech.
And how is it that the basic instinct of survival and freedom has been so beaten out of the American consciousness that whatever you think is the proper response to a mass shooting, that we don't have the proper response to individuals wanting to disarm you?
Because that's a pretty big story, and if you think the mass shooting at a gay nightclub was bad, that resulted in five dead and 25 injured, do you have any idea what kind of a bloodbath disarming the American people would be?
In patriot, militia-type communities and ideology, it's well understood that when disarmament happens, it's time that you gotta start killing.
I've brought it up a bit in the past, but this idea is central to the book Unintended Consequences.
Also, in the Turner Diaries, the inciting incident that leads to the insurrection is the Cohen Act, government confiscation of firearms.
Owen has reached the point of covering the story where he's just making veiled threats.
If you think this mass shooting is bad, consider that if you tried to enact gun regulation, all my friends will start killing cops and engaging in a full-scale insurrection insurgency, becoming the American Al-Qaeda that they've always wanted to be.
So if you compare it to the killing that we would do if you enact gun regulation, this shooting really isn't that big of a deal.
And I think the deep state might be willing to give us this synthetic win feeling like we've got wind in our sails when really we're just unknowingly doing their bidding for them by getting Biden out of the way.
So CBS News did a story about Hunter's laptop because, and the timing of this is because, they were able to acquire a copy of the data directly from the source, not a second or third hand thing.
They reviewed the data with a forensic computer specialist or two who said that they didn't believe that they saw signs of things being added to the data and that it appeared authentic.
This isn't the same thing as saying that all the absurd right-wing media claims about the laptop are confirmed.
It's not even saying that the basis for a lot of those claims is authenticated because these people, like the Rudy Giuliani's of the world and such, they may be working from a copy of the data that's had files added to them.
All the CBS piece can really assert is that the expert they spoke to didn't see signs of tampering in the data directly from the source.
This isn't necessarily as much of a win as Owen wants it to be, and he doesn't get to congratulate himself for being part of a media organization that made a ton of shit up about the laptop after an actual media organization Yeah.
Also, I fucking love this segment.
I love this development so much.
Now...
I guess Alex and Infowars need to protect Joe Biden at all costs.
If they attack him, they're just doing the globalists bidding because they want Biden out of the way.
I think it's sad that we're so normalized to the violence in the inner cities and the shootings in the inner cities that it doesn't even make the news.
Well, it makes the news, but it's never going to make the big national news.
It's never going to be a big story.
It's never going to be a big controversy.
That's sad.
That's sad to me.
That's sad to me that we're about to do this live on air in a couple seconds to prove a point that I can have my crew in there and I can sit here in confidence and I can say, guys, we're going to do this live on air and I have enough confidence to do this and I'm not going to look like an idiot, They can plug in shootings into a search engine and we'll find at least one shooting.
We could add it all up.
We'll probably have dozens dead from shootings in inner cities over this week.
This is how desperately Owen doesn't want to address the actual point and talk about the actual shooting.
He has to deflect so much that he's decided to play a game of shooting roulette with the producers, which, even if he finds a ton of shootings across the country, doesn't prove the point he wants it to.
If anything, it makes a stronger case for gun reform.
He's the one who doesn't care about these shootings in the inner cities.
He's the one who sees them as a prop, just that he can use to distract away from having to talk about the shootings that hit a little too close to home.
People talk very constantly about addressing violence in inner cities, yeah.
And that's because if you have to land your point or argument or anything, then the landing should be good if you want it to be interesting, or the landing should be interesting.
So, okay, survivor of Colorado Springs gay club shooting that left five dead and 25 injured says he mistook gunshots from music before hiding as cops consider hate charges against 22-year-old suspect who was arrested for bomb threats last year.
Oh, he was arrested for bomb threats last year, and he gets away, and he shoots up a gay nightclub.
So, you know the feds were already on him.
You know the feds were already watching him.
unidentified
And then, nope, it shows up at the gay club and kills 25 others and injures 25, and no.
We talked about this earlier, and the bomb threat charges weren't filed, so there's no reason to think the FBI had any involvement in the case, nor that they were following Aldrich.
And since Owen is bringing this up, I guess it's worth noting that there weren't any red flag laws that could have triggered the confiscation of Aldrich's guns after the bomb threat.
Would Owen support that kind of law, or would that be a violation of the Second Amendment?
If he doesn't support confiscating guns from people who make terrorist bomb threats, then his mention of the past crime doesn't really make sense here.
It seems irrelevant.
What Owen is doing is he's trying to say that this is a false flag without saying it directly.
The FBI got in contact with Aldrich after the bomb threat and then used him as a patsy or a mind control sleeper agent or some shit.
This is a consistent pattern with Alex's mass shooting conspiracies from James Holmes to Adam Lanza and Owen is signaling to that knowing that the audience is well aware of what he's saying without directly saying it.
So, the patrons neutralized the threat of the gunmen, but according to Owen, they could have done it even better if someone had a gun.
Weird.
It's fucking stupid, and that's dangerous as an idea.
Odds are that someone with a gun wouldn't have been able to subdue the shooter much quicker than they did, and in a crowded nightclub, it's really dangerous to be in a situation where you're exchanging gunfire.
You have a really high likelihood of hitting another patron.
Really dumb stuff, but I guess that the only thing better than a good guy who takes care of business without a gun is a hypothetical good guy with a gun who does a better...
Job, I guess.
Looks like those producers aren't having an easy time finding a shooting that fits Owen's narrative here.
Yeah, I mean, it doesn't get more obvious exactly what's going on than the right wing being like, oh, this guy who neutralized the shooter, he can go fuck himself because he didn't have a gun.
I don't know if the producers are asleep at the wheel or what, but I guess Owen's just gonna reuse the same headlines he brought up on Sunday's show, which seems a little bit soft.
If these are the things he insists no one cares about, I would suggest he look a little bit deeper.
The first shooting he mentions is in Baltimore, and if Owen were interested, he could check out the Abel Foundation, a non-profit committed to combating gun violence in Baltimore through investing in community programs that aim to intervene in at-risk situations and prevent future violence.
In 2021, they dispensed over $14 million in grants to community-based projects in areas like workforce development, education, and the arts.
This is a group that takes the problem of gun violence in Baltimore very seriously and is working to address the underlying causes and influence of it.
Or if he wanted to go a more religious route, he could discuss the Catholic charity Safe Streets Baltimore.
There are many other groups, too, and this is an issue that's discussed widely.
The second shooting Owen brings up is outside Philly, and the same dynamic is true in Philly as it is in Baltimore.
There are tons of people with goodwill working hard to create solutions to the problem of violence with community-based initiatives.
The premise that no one talks about these shootings because they aren't politically useful or whatever is just false.
It's just Owen.
One of the issues with what's going on is that in the right wing, there's a rising tide of anti-LGBTQ sentiment that a bunch of folks are riding to make a name for themselves in that media sphere.
The libs of TikTok account essentially exist solely to demonize trans people and drag performers.
Matt Walsh's entire brand now seems to be the guy who's really weird and angry about other people's sexuality and identity.
Alex Stein put himself on the map by sexually harassing AOC and now is making antagonistic videos at drag queen story times.
Anti-trans talking points fueled way more than one GOP midterm campaign and it would be hard to find a right-wing media pundit who didn't traffic in the calling random LGBTQ folks.
groomers for horrible crimes like being a teacher in this environment it's clear that a target is being put on a particular community who are being scapegoated and used as a punching bag for political points that's a scary and dangerous situation that we all understand leads to violence we've already seen children's hospitals targeted for bomb threats after being pointed out by libs of tiktok proud boys have shown up in crash drag queen story time yelling about grooming kids often It's crystal clear to anyone paying attention...
That this is a situation where the ice is thin, and the people who are escalating this tension and raising the temperature have no intention of stopping.
So when there's a mass shooting like this at a gay bar, like what we saw in Colorado Springs, it's very easy to understand how that hits particularly hard for people who care about and respect LGBTQ folk.
The writing has been on the wall that something like this was bound to happen.
The people who were inciting hate gleefully continued to do so, and then the horrific happened.
At the time of doing this episode, it does remain to be seen fully what the motive for this shooting was.
It's easy to jump to conclusions that this was definitely an anti-LGBTQ-motivated crime, and I think that the preliminary information points in that direction, but it is possible that there's another motive there that we're yet to learn.
Even if that is the case, it doesn't change anything about why an event like this would be particularly painful.
A community suffers a tremendous loss and a deprivation of a place where they felt like they could be safe while an entire media ecosystem demonizes and dehumanizes them.
And in response, the media ecosystem pretends that the shooting is actually their fault because they hosted drag brunch.
The actual shooter's motive aside, the toxicity and fully committed nature of the anti-LGBTQ positioning of these right-wing figures Yeah,
guess we can do that but he is very clearly ignoring a very salient difference between things because it's threatening and it implicates his worldview and i just think it's pathetic yeah, I mean...
To have lived through so many fucking genocides around the world that have happened beginning with this type of rhetoric and not look at this type of rhetoric happening around us and not be fucking...
Looking into what I was going to cover next, and that was the issue of globalism and the global government, and it hits me.
As I'm looking at this stack of news dealing with the global government and some of the geopolitical news stories on my desk, it just hit me, and it's so obvious.
But we have to remember this.
Almost everything politically, policy-wise, that comes from the Democrat Party is just a feeder into the World Economic Forum, into the one world government.
And so that's what really needs to be understood.
And that's what's so upsetting, because all these Democrat policies are all disingenuous.
If Democrat Party policy is just a feeder into the World Economic Forum, just a feeder into the global government, okay, so let's apply that to what they're doing with gun legislation and what they want with gun confiscation, and then does it hit you?
Then do you see the clear picture here?
Do you see the bigger picture?
Do you see the 10,000-foot view now?
Folks, they can't have their global government with 300 million armed Americans.
Owen is presenting this as a revelation he had while looking at his news that the globalists need to disarm Americans because they can't bring in a world government with so many armed patriots out there?
The whole reason they want to take guns, according to Alex's documentaries and constant rambling, is because they need an unarmed population who can't fight back when the UN troops or the devil or Klaus Schwab invades.
This is 101 stuff, and honestly, this would be like me coming here on episode 751 of our podcast and saying, I looked at this stuff and I listened to Alex and Owen, you know, like, And it dawned on me that they aren't sincere about the things they say.
It just hits me that they ramp up bullshit in order to push an extremist right-wing ideology and sell useless products to their terrified and trapped audience.
Everybody's doing their regular-ass job, sitting in front of the computer, every now and again talking, and the boss comes in and is like, hey, man, I just had this idea.
In order to get their global world government, you can't have an armed civilization.
You can't have America.
You can't have a free people.
So, of course, they're going to use any and every opportunity to convince you to turn your firearms in.
And, of course, they're going to use it when we feel like we're at our most vulnerable, where a school gets shot or a nightclub gets shot or a movie theater gets shot.
And, of course, they always want to tie it into the politics of being gay or the politics of whatever.
It's not necessarily worse because the shooting happened at a gay nightclub.
A shooting like this would be bad no matter what.
But there's an element that Owen is intentionally ignoring.
It's worse that this shooting happened at a gay club because we're currently existing at a time of increased anti-LGBTQ rhetoric being normalized, and a time when the prevailing attitude in the right wing is that we should regress back to a time when society had absolutely zero tolerance for any non-cis, non-straight identifying person.
A shooting that appears to target that community at a time when that rhetoric is flying around the right wing freely does sting a little more than it might otherwise.
But mass shootings, particularly in public places, are awful no matter what.
The shooting at the Walmart in Virginia last week is a horrible tragedy, for example.
I just don't think that this is an honest exploration of anyone's actual feelings.
I don't believe that Owen actually feels this way.
I don't know what he feels, but this is not a well-considered...
Well, I mean, what they want is to say, okay, we all recognize that gun violence is a problem.
How about our solution is we do nothing, and then we get to continue yelling at our politicians about how they don't do anything, which I'm telling you that they shouldn't do.
So then you can yell about these politicians that don't do anything, and you'll believe that I'm helping you in some...
Fucking fashion, beyond all reason, and then you'll blame the politicians and still listen to me.
But it's always important to remember what really lurks behind the Democrats and what really lurks behind the Republican establishment that is the right leg of the Democrat Party, of the larger body politic that is the World Economic Forum.
That is Klaus Schwab.
That is the Great Reset.
That is the global government.
And people need to understand that.
Especially dealing with all of these domestic political issues and policies that might not make sense.
I mean, nobody should understand why the Democrats want to disarm you.
Because a known criminal, a deranged lunatic who already was on FBI watch list for bombings and arrested for bombings, and he goes out and shoots a gay nightclub, and now you have to turn your gun in, and now you have to be a good slave?
He's just making up that the shooter was on an FBI watch list because if he makes up that detail, it makes the shooting way more suspicious to the audience and encourages them not to take it at all seriously.
While Owen insists that the anti-LGBTQ ideology can't possibly be the motive for the attack and no one knows the motive, he feels like it's somehow appropriate for him to just make shit up in order to build up his imaginary motive and explanation for the shooting.
Alex Jones already covered it in the first hour as we enter the second hour of the Alex Jones show.
But it's frustrating when Elon Musk says...
Okay, I'm going to make sure Alex Jones is still banned on Twitter because I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for gain, politics, or fame.
So I guess Elon Musk is really, I mean, he is really feeling good about himself these days, isn't he?
Because, you know, he's the one that should be doling out mercy.
I guess that's how the position he views himself in as the owner of Twitter now.
Okay, so, but by this logic, Elon, anyone who would use the deaths of children for politics, those are your own words, that's your own quote here, Elon, I have no mercy for anyone who would use the deaths of children for politics.
I would love to play this game with Owen, though, because he's in a trap.
Uh-oh.
thing is just using the deaths of children as props to build up their political power oh oh and i guess you could also give the boot to every anti-abortion advocate no i i think owen wouldn't like it too much if this standard was applied But he's having a lot of fun here saying Elon, condescendingly.
Also, Owen is conveniently leaving off the part where Elon says that the reason that he has no mercy for someone like Alex is that, quote...
My firstborn child died in my arms.
I felt his last heartbeat.
Owen probably doesn't want to go anywhere near that, considering that his claims that Neil Heslin couldn't have held his son after the shooting at Sandy Hook were kind of at the center of a lot of the lawsuits, and I would understand if he was once bitten twice shy.
If I were him, I would totally ignore that part too, but it's kind of glaring.
I don't know if that's true or not, but what I'm saying is that if you were going to say that he didn't, you have far more to go on than anything else.
This is the basic stance that needs to be applied for any of our elected politicians here in America, and it's Ron DeSantis in clip 18. I want to have the values not of Davos imposed on us, but of places like Destin and Dunedin, where I grew up.
unidentified
Things like the World Economic Forum, those policies are dead on arrival in the state of Florida.
I suppose yelling or saying that the World Economic Forum is not welcome in Florida is not the applause line that you might be thinking on account of, what the fuck are you talking about?
And they don't like seeing their prisoners of war get shot and raped and have their genitals cut off and torture videos.
This has all been going on by Ukrainians this year.
And so they don't like that.
And so you need to understand that the only reason any of that is happening is because of the West backing Ukraine.
Ukraine would not have any of this.
They would not have the weapons.
They would not have the support.
They would not have the confidence to be committing these war crimes and these heinous crimes against Russians, against Ukrainians, against their own people, against innocent people.
They wouldn't have any of the confidence to do any of this if they weren't getting supported by the West, by the United States of America.
So while human rights abuses are alleged to have been committed by Ukrainian forces as well as Russian forces, this explanation that Owen is giving is bullshit.
This is embarrassingly pro-Russia in its framing, and anyone who took their job as a news commentator seriously wouldn't do this bad a job.
Quick note, though, as you responded to, Russia and Ukraine cannot be in a civil war.
In essence, Owen is saying that Russia had the right to invade and to seize territory that is Ukraine's, and that the only reason there's any problem is because Ukraine fought back with some Western support.
They should have just accepted large areas of their country being taken, their president likely publicly executed, and Russia installing a puppet head of state.
That is Russia's right to do.
That's what they have the right to do.
And because Ukraine didn't go along with it, now all this bad stuff is happening.
It's actually fairly similar in theme to comments that are coming out about the Club Q shooting, particularly the way that Matt Walsh and Tim Poole have framed it.
The shooting happened because the club had a drag brunch that they decided was a grooming event.
It was the shooter's right for there not to be a drag brunch at this bar, but the government and police didn't shut it down for him, so he invaded to take care of it.
In both cases, there's a state of affairs that they have deemed to be correct.
In Ukraine, it's that Russia can do whatever it wants, and in the case of Club Q, it's that LGBTQ folks can't do anything if it in any way offends the extreme right wing.
Ukraine didn't bend to Russia's demands, so they're really responsible for Russia invading, and the folks at Club Q didn't do exactly what the extreme right wingers did.
This is a really troubling mentality, and if you think about it for even a minute...
It's not hard to see how this could be applied very easily to justify atrocity, particularly against groups that you have spent years demonizing and dehumanizing.
So what he's saying is that what Ukraine should have done is allow the Russian government to come in and disarm the citizens of Ukraine, thus taking over their territory, Installing a fascist dictatorship.
Okay, just wanted to be sure that that was what he was saying they should have done, thereby saying that the correct answer...
To globalism is for the United States to lower its weapons, give them to the World Economic Forum because the World Economic Forum is the world and we're just one country.
So they own everybody so they can just walk in and what we should do, especially if it's Russia, if Russia comes in here, we should give up our arms to the government.
Yeah, well, I mean, I think what you're wrestling with is that nothing means anything, and these are all just incendiary and irresponsible, poorly thought-out arguments made for their own sake and for the sake of getting through the day, advancing right-wing ideology and selling dumb pills.
And you can hear the slur and the way that this is being covered is dehumanizing and demonizing of the people there and feeds into exactly the problem that people are discussing.
So, first of all, there's a lot of schools that do have armed officers.
And I can explain this to them.
It's actually really simple.
For one thing, the people who were going there guarding that event, they weren't there as officials hired by the state, which they would likely have to be if they were there guarding a school.
That would involve like a super complicated administrative process to happen, whereas this is just people taking it upon themselves to show up and practice their Second Amendment rights, which Owen should love.
Secondly, there's a bit of a difference between these events and schools.
If Proud Boys and groups of right-wing lunatics fed a steady diet of sensational and bigoted narratives about how the schools were secret grooming programs targeting kids, were showing up at schools routinely to disrupt things, and if there were bomb threats being directed at schools that were pointed out by anti-LGBTQ social media accounts, and an entire section of the media was obsessed with demonizing schools and teachers, in that instance, maybe Antifa would show up at schools.
That isn't happening in the case of schools, but it is in the case of LGBTQ spaces, particularly focused around drag queen storytime, so it kind of makes sense.
In essence, Owen is a part of the media ecosystem that obsesses about these events, lies about them.
Yep.
marvels at the idea that people would show up to provide security from the people who consume that media and show up to antagonize and disrupt the events.
He knows what he's doing, and this is very weak.
He does realize that this video he's talking about is from the same weekend that there was a mass shooting at a gay bar that high-profile right-wing figures are justifying by saying that there was a drag brunch at that bar.
I mean, this is insane.
I don't understand how he can...
I can understand it, but I couldn't understand how someone acting from a place of decent intention could make these kinds of points.
I mean, it is so much just, especially in reaction to this, it is a group of people who want money and power and they just don't care if there's a river of blood beneath them.
And they'll pretend there isn't.
That's better.
We would like money and power, and if there's a river of blood that it takes to get there, fucking fine.
I'll just pretend that it's everybody else's fault.
unidentified
I'll just pretend that- It's probably- Where did that blood come from?
You know, maybe I'm jaded by Infowars, and maybe it's a function of Owen being there instead of Alex, but I honestly think that their response isn't as bad as you could assume.
I think it's a result of all the times that, I mean, you can see it in how many times he had to so obliquely be like, this might have been a false flag.
The distance that they had to keep from those types of things, that would have allowed them to go further.