I think Alex wanted to, like, in that clip, Tucker is trying to pivot over to the bankruptcy. Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's clearly what he's, the road that he's starting down.

But in reality, Alex is setting him up. The first thing Conrad does is correct Alex about his bar being in Barcelona, not Madrid, and Alex is so gracious about it. He's the most agreeable interview you could ever imagine. And this is a strategy that Alex is going to employ in this interview to put Conrad at ease.

So Conrad probably thinks that's a perfectly innocent question that someone with interest in doing a promotional interview might ask, but... It's actually Alex grilling this guy. These questions are being delivered with all the fake respect Alex can muster and designed to elicit responses that Alex can incorporate into the narrative that he's building. For instance, this question was fishing for a response that the chip plan was going to be incorporated in all these other clubs, particularly the ones of the United States, so Alex could claim that the globalists are doing a trial run in Barcelona, but their main plan is to bring it here so they can chip all of his patriot buddies. Conrad doesn't realize it, but Alex is asking him set-up questions, which explains why he's being so pleasant.

This proves definitively the reason that Tucker was chosen is because there is no downside. There's no bad outcome. This is a neutral outcome. This is a zero.

It would have gotten around that rebuttal that he has, but Alex didn't bring that up because he knows that this story is also full of shit. Yeah. So, you bring it up afterwards. Anyway, he succeeded, I think. Alex did on one front. Okay. And that is that he made O 'Boyle look stupid. To the audience. For? By bringing up all these news stories that he didn't know about. Right. And so when he goes to calls, that is a theme that runs through.

And I'm going to ask my question. Was your intention to also mirror that 80-20 rule where the 80% is the Squatch aliens and the stuff like that, and then the 20 is the real science, what you're describing about the scientific racism?

And I think that he did that, and I actually think that that's why this is dangerous. Because I think that Mike successfully navigated the terrain of Alex Jones' shitty interview style. And was given a place where... He could appear to be the person who lives Alex Jones' ideals.

What's fun to me about that is literally he is saying throughout this entire interview, we need to be afraid of Greta. And he is basically telling that to everybody who is watching the show, while at the same time starting with, Greta's the one who's trying to make you afraid. Right. And that's why you should be terrified of Greta.

And Alex, on some level, knows that what he's walking into is either going to be... Him getting her to see his side of things, and then he wins. Or she says stuff like, you can't walk around naked in Cleveland Heights. Right. And then people are like, oh, look at this typical Obama supporter, as Alex has already presented it. Right. You see that he has set himself up in such a situation that he wins kind of no matter what.

The approach they take is intrinsically flawed and speaks to either an unwillingness or an inability to understand the psychology of how to counter propaganda and how to counter Alex specifically.