The second piece is that Alex has been promoting the idea that Ed Martin, the pardon lawyer for Trump's DOJ and the weaponization task force, he's been promoting that they are investigating some of the Sandy Hook plaintiffs and going to overturn Alex's case and all this. So Alex has been pushing that a bit. And then Ed Martin came out and said, no, we're not. And it was really embarrassing for Alex.

I don't know what really happened, but we need congressional investigations. We need statewide investigations. We need hearings on why does the report say there's a pile of dead kids in the bathroom, they've got to force the door open, there's no blood.

I actually did a little bit myself. We were able to find some of the stuff you asked for, but not that particular thing. Are you claiming that you yourself personally did something to locate the emails and records showing that San Diego School was closed? Yes. What did you personally do? I sat there at dinner. With Rob, and I said we've got to try to locate that. We did some online poking around, couldn't find it, like the last time we tried.

Paul Joseph Watson and Alex, when they were on the show, Alex on the 17th and Paul on the 18th, both expressed that they didn't know that this video was as popular as it was. This 10 million view video about Sandy Hook and crisis actors and the false flag.

So if he does start caring a bunch and covering it a ton more, it makes a lot of sense to assume that one of his motivations might be recognizing the market that's there. Yeah, yeah, yeah. So if we see, moving forward, an intense pivot towards covering Sandy Hook and talking about Sandy Hook, you know damn well that's why. That's probably unfair to say with certainty, but it looks like that's probably why.

The article goes on to, quote, Public Affairs Officer Lieutenant Paul Vance as saying, quote, As I said, we're going to look at every single thing, every piece of material, and we'll take it from there. The article explains that the DA was concerned about unsealing warrants related to the case because it would, quote, identify persons cooperating with the investigation, which could be dangerous for them. Oh, yeah? What if their names got out and some crazy conspiracy website would just go and, like, give their names out and maybe publish their addresses and make sure people thought that they were... Okay. That would never happen. Okay, good. He didn't specifically say that it was dangerous because the secret other shooter would get them. He was saying just generally it could be a threat to their safety. And as you're pointing out, by February 5th, 2013, the conspiracies about Sandy Hook were already running full steam ahead. This isn't the basis for a conspiracy theory, and honestly, the conspiracy theories flying around are pretty strong arguments for not releasing those people's names, as you very easily were able to suss out. Now, the idea they do talk about in the article, the idea that there could be other possible suspects, but it's not necessarily even clear if they're talking about other suspects in the shooting or possibly an investigation into where these guns came from. Or something like that. The idea of online contacts he could have had. Suspect doesn't mean suspect in the shooting, necessarily. More suspect of a larger investigation is another entirely sensible interpretation of that article.

I haven't. And you didn't know what he did in the building that day? Weak. You didn't know what he did in the building. I don't know. Correct, Mr. Jones? It's, again, over seven years. I don't remember a lot of this.

No, it introduces the two possibilities that encompass all possible realities for us, and that is he either knew about this stuff or he didn't. If he did know about it, then he intentionally lied about it. If he didn't know about it, then it's clear that he didn't look into anything.

As I've told you, when we went off news reports and other people that were investigating, we did not ourselves investigate Sandy Hook.

And they didn't wipe the computers. Adam Lanza tried to destroy his computers before doing the attack.

I said, I don't tell you what to do most of the time, but I said, just stay away from the Sandy Hook. This is like four years ago.

If you look into him, he is a con artist. He is a guy who has raised crazy amounts of money in quote-unquote investigating Sandy Hook. He's a guy who has offered bounties for proof of various things throughout the years, and people have provided proof. And he's been like, no, not real. He's been like, I'll give you $1,000 if you can give me a picture of X, Y, and Z. People show up, give him pictures, and he's like, nope, not good enough. Nope. Doesn't have metadata on the image. That's a good racket. Yeah, it totally is. That's a good racket. He is an absolute con artist. He's been harassing the family members of the children who died. It's disgraceful.