Claims: in climate change denial

8 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
15 Jan 2020
Carbon dioxide is beneficial for plant growth and the planet needs more carbon to fulfill God's plan for geoengineering.

Because plants grow faster and are healthier and higher carbon dioxide. The truth is the planet's dying. And right at the time, we found the carbon and started putting it back up in the atmosphere. Really? God's plan for us to geoengineer and save the planet right at this time. Wait, so we need to do it? They're trying to shut down that process that God had waiting for us.

08 Jan 2020
Alex Jones believes the corporate media is falsely attributing Australian fires to climate change to push carbon taxes for the benefit of figures like Al Gore, Obama, and Lord Rothschild.

This is Alex's take at the beginning, which is dismissive. It's very much dismissive. What's happening in Australia? Obviously, the millions of acres burned. Obviously, many deaths. Obviously, a lot of property lost. But the big story is the concerted corporate media worldwide is saying it's global warming or climate change. And that if we paid carbon taxes to the UN and to the IMF and World Bank and literally to Lord Rothschild and to Al Gore and Obama and Bill Clinton who own climate exchanges in London, England and Chicago, Illinois, that they will save us. While just by Australia is China with no environmental controls who lobbies for our industry to be shut down. Carbon dioxide coming out of coal plants has nothing, nothing To do with the fact that Australia has always had giant fires.

25 Aug 2017
Exxon knew about climate change in the 1970s and paid to shift public thinking toward faith-based denial.

They just released the Harvard study where they're like, oh, yeah, Exxon knew climate change was an issue in the fucking 70s and they paid so much money to switch everyone's thinking into faith-based thinking.

05 Jun 2017
Lord Monckton claims to have found proof that climate change is based on bad math but provides no specific details.

He claims he actually was on the show just the other day, recently, in 2017, to talk about how he has found proof that climate change is based on bad math, and he's going to release a paper about it. How'd that go? Doesn't give any details. No details? No details. It's based on bad math. Yeah, he's found four huge errors that were made. Does not explain any of them.