He has no interest in the sanctity and preciousness of honesty.

I think Roger and Clayman are both bad. They're both bad actors. I don't particularly care to scale them or anything. But it really does demonstrate the difference between having it and not. Roger has it. I was just about to say, through this whole deposition, it's like... This is how he gets so many people. Everybody knows he's going to stab you in the back, but he's charismatic and he's funny and he can throw some zingers out. And if you feel like he's on your team, you're like, yeah, we can take down anybody. And then you get stabbed in the back.

See, I have come to the place where now I just instinctively believe that Roger A. knows everything and B. is lying about everything.

Roger Stone seems fun and is a monster.