Unless his goal sincerely is to be an out-and-out Putin apologist as this goes on.

The way that Alex is trying to position himself and pretend that he's not just doing. Intense rationalization, justification of Putin's invasion when that's all he's doing.

I find it fascinating that David Icke is allowed to come on his show and say there is no virus, and he agrees with him and is convinced. Even if it is sort of conditional convinced, I'm like, hey, you know, maybe he's right. Because he does, after that clip I played where he's convinced by David Icke, he does walk back a little bit.

It's really hard to tell which is the case, but you better believe that if he's ever confronted with some of the stuff that Nick says on his own platforms, Alex will immediately call him controlled opposition like he does with Richard Spencer. That is the route that this would go if Alex was confronted with all of the stuff that Nick does.

Because if Alex had a moral and intellectual consistency, what we've seen so far is at least aversion to the actor's narrative. He scolded that caller who brought up the idea that Robbie Parker was an actor. He's like, you can't say that about someone who's grieving their child's death. There was a repulsion about it initially. When he had Paul Joseph Watson interview James Tracy, there was an attempt to distance and interview the guy about what he believes, but not be associated with it.

Now, here on March 27th, you see almost complete acceptance of it.