Today, Dan and Jordan continue looking into the past to follow Alex Jones' path downward after Sandy Hook. In this installment, Steve Pieczenik finally shows up on the scene to mix things up, and Alex reveals what's at "the bottom of the rabbit hole."
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, I like what these dudes do, you like this show, you can support the show if you'd like by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
Coming up today, on this Wednesday, the 27th day of March, 2013, worldwide broadcast.
The news websites are Infowars.com, and of course, we're also streaming video at PrisonPlanet.tv.
And again, we are going to be taking your phone calls today.
Professor Griff, one of the founders of Public Enemy, was on with us a few weeks ago, and he promised to come back just to take...
Phone calls for an hour on hip-hop, rap, and government media control of not just it, but rock and roll and other systems that are used to dominate and steer culture.
And a couple years ago, we discovered stories that were out there.
That clearly had been written by a robot.
But now they're getting good enough where they're just going to have government press releases that are then rewritten so they're, quote, original and have the local name put on it.
And, of course, the humans will be removed there.
And that's why they've told the White House Press Corps, they even told Politico this, If you don't totally toe the line, if you ever make one snide comment about the White House, you will never be in the press conference, you will never be given the press release.
Because it's all, who gets the press release and the access?
And now they're saying, they said this a month ago, they may go to a virtual president where it's a hologram recording of him, and then it'll be a full hologram composite where they just write the words, and it's not even a recording of Obama.
Now, one, they're going to eventually take over and control the Earth.
Naturally, the Hall of Presidents automatons will become the actual presidential hall.
And two...
When they have those, when the automatons are running everything, they're going to need their own version of the automatons for people to walk, well, obviously, for cyborgs to walk into and see the presidents of the past.
So naturally, they're going to switch to holograms.
Because he starts rambling and spiraling out, and, you know, like, the holographic president and the pre-recorded speeches and all this stuff is, you know, it's all part because the Illuminati's going to take over, right?
Sure, sure.
And you've got to fight back now for these press releases or whatever, because if you don't, the Illuminati will take over, and when they do, you're dead.
Just like, you know, gray aliens in the Hollywood movies communicating with each other with computer-assisted telepathy.
The whole gray thing is a template program to condition you to accept that that's what we're going to look like in the future, and the grays are humans from the future.
That is not really real, as far as I understand it from the highest level of Illuminati information.
And I'm laying down some hardcore info on you here today, because this is the plan.
Alex, you know, he's talking about all this, this kind of, you know, this 2001 Space Odyssey nonsense, the gray aliens are, you know, the Illuminati believes X, Y, or Z, but he doesn't believe this stuff.
He needs to give himself the veneer of rationality.
And so he always retreats behind the, I don't believe this stuff.
So this is a reference to that same quote that Alex misuses from H.G. Wells' book, The New World Order, all the time.
He misuses it constantly.
It's almost as if he only read this one paragraph of that book, not understood it, and decided to base a lot of his ideas about the world and the globalists on that misunderstanding.
In discussing how he observed the world was generally trending towards greater social democracy, H.G. Wells says, quote, nor does it alter the fact that even when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and Countless people,
from maharajas to millionaires, and from puka sahibs to pretty ladies, will hate the New World Order, be rendered unhappy by frustration of their passions and ambitions through its advent, and will die protesting against it.
When we attempt to estimate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.
The list of people he's saying will be against social democracy are the very top of the prevailing social hierarchy.
The millionaires, kings, colonialists, and aristocrats.
When Wells makes reference to gallant and graceful-looking people, he's expressing a feeling that monsters are not always grotesque, and often actually beautiful.
Alex seems to think that the passage is about himself, and that Wells is expressing a sense that eventually patriots would show up to counter these nefarious plans he's putting out, and that these patriots would be gallant and really hot.
And that fits perfectly in with Alex's self-designed mythology, but it doesn't match with the point Wells is making at all.
Much like Alex's interpretation of scripture, this is an act of eisegesis, and it only makes sense if you understand that Alex read this paragraph trying to find support for the things that he already believed.
This pattern, along with tons of other behaviors, make Alex a terrible sociologist, terrible anthropologist, terrible psychologist, and terrible historian.
Which are all labels he has no business giving himself.
So, Alex takes some calls here on this show, and he gets a caller who wants to talk about how the Catholic Church wants his guns, and then at the end of this, if you listen very carefully, he gives a citation for some of his beliefs, and it's deeply troubling.
unidentified
Nobody I know of so far has responded to an article of February 25th.
It's an article in either it's America or Catholic America magazine.
They have an article on the 25th of February issue.
They actually have an article in there that I read that they are calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment.
And I've heard nobody respond to the Vatican or Rome doing this or any other religion.
I actually search engine it, because I scanned through XM, and they have a Catholic channel on there, and I just stopped and listened to it.
They were talking about a Vatican release, the Second Amendment.
There it is.
Repeal the Second Amendment, the National Catholic Review.
Isn't that the official?
Yes, it is.
unidentified
And also, over the years, Rome hates the American Constitution.
And it's proven also by, if you ever can get a hold of it through maybe Chick Publications, it's called 50 Years in the Church of Rome by Father Jack Cheney.
I don't know if Alex did actually scan around on XM and find a Catholic channel, but this isn't...
Like a fake thing.
This actually is real.
It was an op-ed published in the Catholic magazine America where the author posited that the best way, possibly the only way, that this country was going to ever have sensible gun laws is if we repeal the Second Amendment.
This wasn't necessarily a call to outright ban guns.
It's more of a realization that the Second Amendment absolutely gets in the way of any conversation about guns.
So possibly if it were gone, we would be able to have a rational debate where people were still able to preserve their rights to self-defense and gun ownership, but we would also be able to fix some of the problems that have come along with the UPy.
It's kind of a sensible position.
Possibly a bit controversial to come from a religious magazine, but definitely not something I would call scandalous.
The writer of the editorial even grappled with the reluctance of people to alter laws, particularly ones in the Constitution, but ultimately those are just laws written by and passed by humans.
If they were passed in one circumstance and those circumstances change, it makes sense to consider changing the laws.
Probably more troubling to me in that call is the fact that the caller is also citing a book that is put out by Chick Publications, the business run by Jack Chick.
He's the guy who puts out those little cartoon pamphlets full of gross and grotesque depictions of Christian fundamentalist ideas.
Those exist primarily and almost exclusively to scare the shit out of children about how they're going to hell if they stray from the fundamentalist path.
Chick tracts run the gamut of Christian issues.
You're going to hell if you get an abortion.
You're going to go to hell if you have sex.
You're going to go to hell if you do drugs.
All the stuff you'd expect.
But Jack Chick was also a rabid anti-Catholic.
He constantly rails on Vatican conspiracies in his work.
So this article is being brought up.
It is a real article.
Making a point that it would be easy for Alex to manipulate into being the Catholic Church and this new pope that we just got.
I told you, and I didn't tell you, but you said it very clearly.
There's no question in my mind after I examined Sandy Hook that Sandy Hook was a total false flag.
There was no individual involved.
There wasn't Asperger's.
There wasn't 24 kids who were killed.
There was a woman by the name of Susan Collins with a $600 million contract that writes about wars called Hunger Games and post-apocalyptic events.
And she didn't say a damn word.
It's a place where I know very well because I train in Greenwich, Connecticut.
The first responders who were in the New York Times said they had PTSD.
Well, they are the only ones I know who are Irish Catholic, have PTSD, and had increased in union pension because of the non-existing Well, they also caught SWAT team people in the woods and then said it never happened, though we have the video and now the arrest record.
It never happened.
And the problem is we're having false flags repeatedly with this president in order to justify expansion.
So, on February 12th, 2013, Steve Pachanek posted a blog entry where he's very explicit that all the people involved in Sandy Hook were actors.
I can say with certainty that at least by that point, February 12th, Steve is absolutely advancing this narrative.
His theory seems to be rooted in the fact that he credits himself as an author of Tom Clancy's books so he knows a bit about fiction writing.
The story of Sandy Hook struck him as a poorly written piece of fiction so when he found out that Susan Collins, the author of The Hunger Games, was from Newtown he put two and two together and decided this explains everything.
Suffice it to say, this is not convincing stuff.
Tracing back to January 22nd, Steve posted on his blog, quote, Who does that sound like?
I have every reason to suspect that Alex knows what Steve believes.
At this point, Steve has been publicly accusing the survivors and victims of Sandy Hook of being actors, and he's someone Alex knows and respects.
It just doesn't track.
The idea that Alex would think that Steve is a hero, an intelligence operations veteran who's working for the Patriots, who has a blog where he lays out his analysis of current affairs, and then Alex doesn't read that blog?
It's possible, but if that's the case, then it's a really good piece of evidence that Alex doesn't do nearly the amount of preparation that he wants you to believe he does.
If you read the discovery request in the lawsuit that Alex is facing for his Sandy Hook coverage, a couple of things stick out.
There are obvious pieces of things that they're looking for, like requests for all the materials involving Sandy Hook, the word crisis actors, anything involving Wolfgang Halbig.
That's what you'd expect.
But then, when you get to item number three...
The plaintiffs request, quote, all documents and or communications between you and any of the following individuals or anyone acting on their behalf concerning any of the topics listed.
There are only two names on that list.
James Tracy isn't on there.
Wolfgang Helbig isn't on that list.
It's only Steve Pachenik and Jonathan Reich.
Reich was a 26-year-old dude who got arrested for harassing Sandy Hook families as well as the county medical examiner.
He hasn't shown up on Alex's show or had any mention.
There's a longer list in item number four of requests for communications regarding appearances on Infowars, which includes both of those two dudes and some of the other likely suspects like Ted Anderson and Wolfgang Helbig.
But Reich and Steve Pachanek are the only two people who the plaintiffs requested all communications concerning the covered topic.
Based on what I've been able to suss out from listening back to these episodes, it appears that the plaintiffs may have the same working theory that I'm coming to, namely that Steve is communicating with Alex behind the scenes and it's leading to a shift in his coverage.
a little bit of a theory from my position, but this is not nothing.
When Paul Joseph Watson interviewed James Tracy about the crisis actor theory a little while back, they were at least trying to be explicit about not endorsing his ideas.
Paul Joseph Watson had to list off a ton of disclaimers and caveats about how he doesn't agree with this guy.
Now, not too much longer after this point, we have our first instance of someone saying that the victims and survivors were all actors with no pushback and actually excitement from Alex.
Other than like a stray caller that Alex might have gotten, no one has expressed this theory on the show.
And anyone who has has gotten at least...
Some performative pushback.
Alex is thrilled with Steve bringing this up now.
It almost gives him the ability to cover this now.
Because Steve is giving him that.
And I'll say this.
If you go back and you look at a bunch of these These blogs that are sort of aligned with patriot ideas and stuff.
The day after this, there are tons of articles about Steve Pachanek appearing on Alex's show and saying that Sandy Hook was fake.
So the idea that Alex had a hand in really amplifying and legitimizing these ideas, if this is the beginning of it and the kernel of it, he presents Steve Pachanek as an absolute expert in everything.
He was part of the CFR, but he left because he was disgusted.
Having him on, allowing this to be said uncritically and with no pushback, and in fact celebration of Steve's comments, does a massive piece of work in terms of legitimizing the crisis actor's theory.
The role that Alex plays, even if it is a little bit...
Delayed in as much as these theories are floating around on the internet and conspiracy forums.
When he's on Alex's show, it's very controlled, measured.
There's almost a, I don't know, there's an elevation to the way he's speaking.
On his blog, it's just full of, like, bold letters and all caps and, like, pictures of, like, Photoshop pictures of Rom and Obama in, like, homosexual attire.
To only know Steve from his appearances on Alex's show, you go and read these rambling, nonsensical blog posts, poorly formatted, just full of shit.
It's very weird.
It calls into question, like...
How much of his presentation on Alex's show is a put-on in order to make him seem more rational and more reliable as a source, as opposed to where he has full control over what he's putting out?
I think if Steve Pachenik was writing Alex's character in a Tom Clancy book, I imagine every line of dialogue would have an ironic adverb at the end of it.
Like, I'm not a fear monger!
He said fear mongeringly.
Like, that's the only way you could write that character.
You slit its throat to bleed it out so that the meat doesn't spoil.
You butcher it yourself.
You cook it yourself.
You're thinking about that animal while you're eating it.
And it's activating synapses and instincts in your mind of the entire human experience.
You don't need to do that to connect to your race memories.
You can do it by digging in the dirt.
You can do it by planting seeds and then watering plants, and just doing that will open up.
And I've never read this.
I know this.
I'm sure someone's written it, because any truth you've already found self-evident, others as well, activates and literally communicates with your soul.
Simultaneously, Alex will say that science has proven all of this stuff.
Like the stuff about literal connections, the ancestors.
I don't believe that.
I do believe that he's just making this stuff up.
And it's maybe an experience that he's had with his weird brain of eating a kill.
I certainly find it pretty fascinating how plants grow.
Now that I've grown some of these plants, watching them come from little seedlings to almost full-grown plants, it's pretty wild to think that it was just a tiny little seed and now, ha-ha, plant.
I could see how if I had a very, very weird brain, I could really turn that into some sort of a transcendent experience.
When you're a young man, that's why they want to make it illegal.
Put you in prison.
That unlocks the synapses.
That is the rites of passage.
That's why the social engineers, and I'm giving you the deepest truths here, want to destroy all the ancient covenants and all the ancient rituals of humanity.
It is to break the genetic encoding recordings that are in the DNA from our ancestors.
And the chills I feel when I talk about this is losing all of that information.
You know, when I cry sometimes, people say it's fake and it's not because I can feel the death of the connection to our ancestors and everything that's going to come in the future.
It's the end of humanity and a horrible abomination.
And I feel all of our ancestors crying out against us that we awaken and have strength against this, that we rise above the robot class, that we break our chains and transcend the technocracy and take To the stars and our true destiny.
Honestly, if he was going to dig in deep and just do a bunch of...
I would almost guarantee that somewhere inside there, he resents native tribal populations for having more of a connection to Earth than he thinks he does.
But whatever the case is, there's just nothing in this period.
But this made me laugh pretty hard.
Alex makes a claim that, man, just think about this in the context of he's still doing his show six years after this and screaming all the time about his enemies.
Those of you deceived by this, I don't even hate you anymore.
And in a way, a warm friend has left me.
Because hate is a warm thing.
I always fought the globalists because I have love, and that's my main engine, but there was always a nice strata of hatred, and now it's not even hatred.
I think that's crazy, but it's also like, I think that's funny.
Just as an idea that he thinks that he's there.
But then it's also really funny.
This is what he's doing instead of taking calls.
You wouldn't do that if you had calls to go to.
This is 40 minutes into his show.
He has every reason to not spend time pretending he's reached a zen state in his battle.
It's pretty crazy.
But he does get some calls.
And there's one guy who calls in.
And it's interesting, because Alex, on our last recent present day episode, Alex said that he was going to come into the studio and talk about what's at the bottom of the rabbit hole.
You know, it's almost like the president is asking questions and then we go back to the past and get the answer to those questions and we're like, man, I wish we didn't get that answer.
This is obviously an exaggeration of the whole used panty vending machine thing, and Alex is adding details in to make it sound more grotesque and fit his worldview.
I read an interesting article on the website Tech in Asia where they look into the whole thing to get to the bottom of what's real and what's, well, kind of based on racist ideas and urban myths about Japanese people.
As it turns out, the...
The machines advertise, quote, used underwear, but the actual Japanese text is saying that they're manufactured to appear used, similar to pre-distressed jeans.
The website theorizes that non-native speakers see the word used on the machine and they come to their own conclusions.
Whereas if you actually speak Japanese, you wouldn't make the same mistake.
Which tracks neatly with Alex saying that he got this information from Mancow, who is visiting and he doesn't speak Japanese.
The issue about this sort of thing is, like, yes, there are people who have, you know, indulge in some sort of a kink that other people would find disgusting.
Well, actually, I would say that a good sociologist could make the argument that by repressing all these kinks, we wind up leaning closer to the blood drinking and assassinating people.
Japanese, the top seller, doesn't specify what that even means, the top seller in Japan is diapers for people to shit in because they all love defiling themselves and...
And a couple of FBI agents who were corrupt had moved in in the neighborhood to houses that they had seized in drug raids.
And then I even had some of them come around.
They started messing with my parents.
I haven't told the whole story while we moved out of Dallas.
My dad sold the dental office he had and things.
And he'd come by.
He'd see me at the local community pool.
Alex, you think you're a real smart young kid like you.
Good looking guy.
You got a future and all the rest of it.
And he'd sit there and lean with his trophy wife beside him at the pool and he'd go, you just better watch what happens to you, what you've been talking about.
And I went, oh, you know about the local police and how I've been saying they're drug dealers because I've seen them do it.
Even if this story was believable on its own, that as the solution to the problem, it makes less sense.
It's how a kid would interpret things.
It could be the sort of story that you tell yourself when you're getting in trouble at school, so they want to move, change environments because you're a piece of shit kid.
Maybe a change of scenery will change all sorts of outcomes.
Maybe there's bad influences at that school.
Maybe he's running with a bad crowd.
You can maybe finesse things in your own mind to tell yourself a different story of what actually happened.
And I think that Alex has decided that this false version of the story that he tells is the reality.
Yeah, it's a story like that that really makes me think that his parents just fucked him up.
I don't know if they did.
It sounds to me like based on every story we've heard about him moving or any kind of significant life change before he would have any control over it.
His parents probably just lied out their fucking face.
And this caller is expressing a sense that now that he believes all of Alex's narratives and all of the worldview that Alex puts out, his friends don't agree with him anymore.
That's a situation where what Alex is doing is mocking the out-group.
The friends that he has that don't agree with Alex's worldview, there's a dismissal of their point of view, a mockery, which serves to insulate the in-group that this kid is a part of with Alex.
And I don't think that that's healthy.
I think that's not good.
Because a lot of the things that the kid is expressing...
I think that there's some merit to.
Not necessarily a lot of believing in Alex, but the idea of generational isolation that you feel with technology taking over to an extent where it feels like there's a lot of impersonalization.
It's not a development in as much as, like, now we've had Steve come on and introduce the acceptability of dealing with this as a crisis actor situation.
So J.P. Morgan is buried at Cedar Hill Cemetery in Hartford, Connecticut.
When he's saying that there's an extra layer to this story, it feels like he's talking about Sandy Hook because it's Connecticut, but it's not explicit that he's connecting these things.
Yeah, and this is kind of the problem with how Alex relates to his callers.
He has no time left on the show, even though he's in overdrive and can keep going as long as he wants, but he allows this guy to throw out something completely unfounded and insane while leaving himself no time to respond, except for with a weird groan.
You can't operate like this, especially when Alex fancies himself, and he talks about it a lot, about like...
I get so much information from you all.
The callers of the Brain Trust, they turn me on to these stories and gun bills that I didn't even know were happening.
You've got a caller calling in saying that this J.P. Morgan grave robbery happened.
You have no time for him to articulate or get into the specifics of it.
It's just left hanging there.
If I were Alex, I had one second left and that guy said that.