Today, Dan and Jordan discuss the last episode of The Alex Jones Show before Alex takes off for a week out of town trying to get attention by bullhorning people around CPAC. In this installment, Alex talks to three jerks and spends most of his time trying to sell his survival food.
I'm not much of, like, I wouldn't be somebody that you would call a gamer.
I don't have, like, a lot of...
Knowledge or sophistication.
But if you give me a game where I can run around, there's a mystery to solve, there's side quests, I can get completely distracted by things, there's variability in the things you're doing.
So sometimes you're fighting something, and then sometimes maybe you're solving a puzzle where you've got to go up a cliff.
Thank you so much, Adam B. Yes, thank you very much.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support these gents, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button that says support the show, we would appreciate it.
So, yeah, I mean, it is a sort of natural consequence that you might expect to see that there would be some market fears, some jitteriness based around the fact that the outbreak is continuing to go on.
There's fears of disruption of some international business.
And, you know, you could talk about that one way, or you could say that it's proven that this is man-made.
And that is that all the people at this Bernie rally are raving lunatics who piss their pants.
Anyway, the big news is that one of Owen's security guards was attacked by the horrible, evil, violent Bernie supporters, who we know from Project Veritas videos want to put Alex and his friends in a gulag.
So what happens is this woman is expressing this love, and then a younger man walks up and appears to be taking a bit of a more confrontational pose towards Owen and his security guards, but he's not attacking anyone or anything.
As far as the video shows, at this point, unprovoked, Owen Schreier hits this guy in the face with his bullhorn.
He just clocks the guy with the bullhorn.
Now, the problem is that Owen had a security guard standing in between him and this guy he just hit with a bullhorn.
So he had to reach over the security guard to hit him.
As Owen is bringing the bullhorn back to a neutral position, he also hits his own security guard in the face with the bullhorn.
It's legitimately clear as day from the video, which Infowars posted on their website, even showing it in slow motion, that the only strike that occurred was Owen hitting two people in the face with a bullhorn, seemingly completely unprompted.
InfoWars has been showing the security guard's face, which was bloodied, and using it as proof of the violent left and how conservatives can't go out into public without getting attacked.
But they failed to point out that the only thing that hit that dude's face was Owen Schroer's bullhorn, and he never would have been hurt if Owen hadn't hit the other guy in the face, seemingly unprovoked.
Cassandra Fairbanks wrote an article on Gateway Pundit with the headline, quote, InfoWars crew member attacked and left bloodied by crazed leftists at Bernie rally.
I've been looking for other angles of this video, but I haven't been able to find any.
And based on what I can see, this really looks like a case of Owen assaulting a guy, accidentally hitting his own security guard in the face, then blaming the guy he assaulted for hitting his security guard.
It's super clear from the video that the guy made no contact with the security guy's face at all.
And this is why they're not going to press charges against that dude.
That will never, ever happen because the exonerating evidence is clearly posted on band.video for the world to see.
Remember when I was telling you before the show that I was exhausted by Infowars?
This is really one of the reasons why I'm feeling that today.
Because it's clear, if you watch the video, that this is a situation where it's...
It's insane to see Owen take his bullhorn and hit a guy in the face with it and then them plead like...
That can't be.
It's nuts, but it flies.
And someone like Cassandra Fairbanks will write an article with their position on it, and then a bloodied face, and it'll be attached to, this is what the crazed leftists do.
It's exhausting because it works.
It works, and there's nothing you can really do about it.
That's the other reason that this is very exhausting.
Because this episode, listening to it, was so much My Patriot Supply advertising that I just came to a point where I was like, am I just going to cut out a super cut of him selling the food?
And here's just one of the hosts licking her lips, hoping for this.
unidentified
So if the stock market were to tumble this year, if we don't get near the 3% GDP growth that this administration has been talking about for years, these are all things that Dems can run on.
If Alex hates that commentator, he must really hate what Trump himself said about the real estate crash.
Prior to the crash, he was interviewed for an audiobook in 2006 where he was asked, quote, There's a lot of talk, which you have no doubt heard too, about a so-called real estate bubble.
What's your take on that pessimism?
Trump replied, quote, Well, first of all, I sort of hope that happens, because then people like me would go in and buy.
You know, when you're in a good cash position.
When I'm in a good cash position today, then people like me would go in and buy like crazy.
That sounds way more like a guy who's rooting for a market to collapse than the clip that Alex just played.
The difference between Trump and this commentator, though, is that the commentator was just discussing a potential weak point for Trump in the next election, and Trump was explicitly saying that the bursting of a real estate bubble would be good because he could personally make money off it.
And then turn people against the nationalist Trump, they'll do it in a heartbeat.
In fact, that's what Cloward and Piven's all about.
Just one of the communist plans by a U.S. university that was adopted by the Democrats back in the 80s publicly.
They said we want to overload the economy with migrants and with welfare and with people having all sorts of rights that don't exist, like to have a comfort pony.
While China doesn't even have any environmental standards or regulations, So we've discussed Cloward and Piven in the past, and it's not what Alex is describing.
It's not really a plan as much as it is an analysis.
These two professors were making the argument that financial hardship was far worse in our country than the statistics we're able to capture, and that a lot of the American public were suffering through things, even though relief was available to them.
Part of what allows our system to continue the way it has is the illusion that most people are doing okay.
And one thing that would shatter that illusion is if everyone in this country who was eligible for social welfare programs collected on what they were eligible for.
This would lead to an overloading of the welfare system, and from that, with the scope of the real problem clear to see, the government would be inclined to finally eliminate poverty by instituting a guaranteed income for citizens.
This plan was obviously not adopted by the Democratic Party in the 80s, considering that it was written in 1966 and we don't have anything resembling guaranteed income, and the candidate who was running on UBI, Andrew Yang, has already dropped out of the race.
Alex doesn't understand Cloward and Piven, but he knows the name and he knows that his audience is not going to look into it enough to recognize that he's just making shit up.
As far as I can tell, Alex is just making up the claim that Democrats don't work.
I'd be interested to see where he's getting that from, because from everything I can tell, it's a completely fabricated stat.
I don't know if you've ever spent your time watching videos of pelicans or cruising images of pelicans, but I have, and I will tell you, they are mean.
This seems to be a meme that went around in right-wing circles in 2019, making fun of the snowflakes and whatnot.
Apparently there was an apocryphal story about someone trying to claim a pelican as an emotional support animal, but I can find no evidence that that actually happened, but I can find a tweet from Adam Carolla making fun of the idea.
As far as I can tell, it was a fake story that was used as proof that the left was out of control.
Alex is only bringing this up because at the end of January, the Department of Transportation proposed a new rule that would strictly limit emotional support animals that are allowed on planes to be specifically specially trained dogs.
I checked in with the rules on various airlines and up to that point, no one allowed pelicans.
American Airlines has clear rules on their website with cats and dogs being allowed with some pretty strict requirements in place.
Delta has a list of animals that are specifically restricted as sport animals, and that includes rodents, insects, reptiles, birds, anything with hooves, basically everything except cats or dogs.
Southwest is explicit in it only allowing, quote, small vaccinated domestic cats and dogs in an appropriate pet carrier in the aircraft cabin.
No one has a support pelican on planes, and the Department of Transportation's new rule recommendation is aimed at targeting people they believe are trying to pull a scam by claiming their dog or cat is an emotional support animal and thus skirting the fee they would have to pay to travel with their pet.
That's what they're doing.
They're trying to crack down on financial shit.
It has nothing to do with leftist snowflakes wanting support pelicans because of Cloward and Piven.
If Howard Hughes had really gotten his airline off the ground, we would have been able to have spruce geese on all of our planes whenever we so desired.
The issue, too, is that we're seeing these sort of flare-ups happening in countries like Italy, and it's not showing to have the fatality rates that you would be afraid of.
And it's not to say that, hey, it's fine or it's good that we have the coronavirus popping up other places, but it's certainly seeming to indicate that, okay, We're looking at a fatality rate that is very low.
And people who are in those demographics that are dying are people who are elderly or have pre-existing conditions, which is what you would expect.
So what we got going on here is that Alex believes that the globalists changed the name of the coronavirus to take Wuhan out of it, which is just something he's repeating for Mike Adams.
Here's Mike back on February 16th informing Alex of this dreadful conspiracy.
The real play here is that China now wants to export these infections to other countries so that China doesn't get the blame for the global pandemic that's coming.
I have no question.
No doubt, China is trying to export infections to Taiwan, to Hawaii, to Malaysia, Singapore, Japan, so that China doesn't get the blame.
They already convinced the WHO to change the name of the virus away from the Wuhan pneumonia coronavirus.
To COVID-19, which doesn't have the word China in it, by the way.
They're trying to rewrite history.
They're trying to blame America.
If they can cause an outbreak in America, they can say, look, even the CDC couldn't control this.
How could you expect us in China to control it?
So this is getting to a very dangerous biological weapons stage.
Here's the underlying assumption that Mike is making there that no serious person would ever make.
Mike is acting like public health workers are looking to assign blame for this.
Blame is such a strange word to use in a situation like the one we're in.
It should really tell you that Mike is not a health ranger or a science ranger.
He's a propaganda narrative ranger.
Blame is a word you use when you're telling a story, not when you're looking at dealing with an outbreak in a naturally occurring health situation.
These dudes have drifted so far past the point where they believe that this is a bioweapon that they're just having casual conversations about China exporting the virus to other countries so they don't get the blame for a bioweapon.
It's at the point where a coherent conversation between whatever they think is going on and someone who's dealing with reality is just impossible.
People colloquially called it like a Wuhan coronavirus because the city of Wuhan was a distinguishing marker about the outbreak.
But the actual temporary name that scientists gave it was 2019 NCOV to mark the year and NCOV to mean novel coronavirus.
They made this official policy in 2015 because of things like how people slaughtered pigs and disrupted pork imports for no reason after that 2009 outbreak that was called the swine flu.
People make assumptions based on names, and it's best to do whatever you can to make that response more difficult for people to make.
Actual scientists would never call this virus the Wuhan coronavirus in any official way, and given that Mike Adams pretends that he's an expert on this stuff and basically a doctor, he should know that.
It's basic stuff, and he's painting it as a conspiracy.
They took Wuhan out of the name so we don't know it's China.
So I have no idea where Alex is getting this information from, that healthy young people are dying from the coronavirus.
Literally everything I can find suggests that is not the case.
This is a really big claim that Alex is making, since almost all other sources I can find are pretty clear that the vast majority of fatalities that are being seen are among elderly people and people with pre-existing conditions.
So I would call on him to cite his source, name some specifics, who are these young people.
I suspect he doesn't have any sources, which is why he never brings any of them up.
So we get to talking about Italy here in this next clip, and there's actually a really interesting way in which Alex is wrong about the cases in Italy.
So when he's talking about Italy there, specific information about the cases of coronavirus that are popping up in Italy, at the time I was preparing this episode, they're not readily available.
So I can't really comment on what's going on there, the source of it, how these things happen.
The coming days will bring with them much more detail about that sort of stuff.
And at that point, when that happens, we can have a fuller conversation about it.
But it would be irresponsible for now.
For now, though, I want to address Alex's claim that Italy shows that the virus is much more deadly than the Chinese government was saying because the Chinese lie.
In essence, he's asserting that the Chinese covered up the fatality rate of the virus, and now that there are a bunch of people in Italy getting it, we're seeing proof that there was a cover-up.
Actually, the opposite is true.
It makes sense to maintain some skepticism towards the information coming out of China, so you can't really blame a person for doing that.
However, Alex is not just skeptical.
He's wrong.
According to an article from February 25th in Forbes, quote, Italy's surprise blowout of the new coronavirus shows that despite the countries bursting into the scene over the last few days, their mortality rate is similar to China's.
This is actually good news.
If it turns out to be true in other countries where public health data is more trustworthy, then one can assume that China is not entirely underestimating the mortality rate.
The latest figures from Italy had the mortality rate at approximately 2.6%, which is south of Well, the...
So, in terms of the actual claims being put forth by Alex, that the cases in Italy demonstrate that China was lying about the mortality rate of the virus, he's either making that up or he doesn't understand the numbers or anything about the situation.
And they said, okay, if it's locked in, it's guaranteed at three weeks.
But we're going to have to tell folks now, four weeks now, and we may at this rate just say, I mean, if it keeps happening in two or three days, they may just have to say no more orders.
What you're seeing is basically my Patriot Supply reaching the point where they can't handle any more orders.
It makes sense.
They can hire temporary staff to satisfy their increased labor demands with packaging and fulfillment, but they aren't willing to build a new factory or plant to increase the output.
Their existing facilities are at the maximum output, and to increase that number, they'd need to put in a long-term investment in an additional facility, and they're not going to do that because they know this is a temporary situation, which they have now basically maximized their profit from.
So the only other possibility here is that they're trying to pretend there's an actual food shortage.
Dow drops more than 900 points as coronavirus cases outside of China surge.
We know what this is.
This is the answer to nationalism.
This is the answer to Trump.
This is the answer to a good economy in the West and China's fake, overblown economy that had people rebelling inside China and without, in Taiwan, a cover for Xi Jinping to then export.
The UN, three weeks ago, was saying shoot people at checkpoints, weld their doors.
The reason that society isn't better is because of bad actors like this.
If people just would stop...
Fucking following these guys that have an actual reasonable conversation that doesn't wind up anything and everything being a goddamn conspiracy to take down Trump because he's fucking evil!
Alright, CDC says there are now 53 cases in the United States.
We have reliable information that tells us that that's only one twentieth of the total number of infections that are known to the CDC in the United States.
So I went and checked naturalnews.com and read some of the articles they posted, and there's literally no support or citation given for claims that the CDC is covering up a thousand cases of coronavirus in the United States.
It's important to understand that when people like Alex or Mike Adams claim that they have information on a good authority or from a high-level source, they're making it up.
They pretend to be journalists, so they know that it would take a really serious reason for a court to compel them to ever reveal a source, so they're completely free to make things up and attribute them to unnamed sources whenever they please.
The fact that they operate like this goes a long way towards explaining why they always yell about the New York Times and other journalistic outlets using sources under the condition of anonymity.
Again, there is a part of it that is, yes, some stuff that China is doing is essential towards global response to this.
And another piece of it is the PR thing that we discussed on a past episode.
The idea of like...
If the World Health Organization comes out and nitpicks everything that China is doing in response to this, they jeopardize the possibility of full cooperation.
And that is a big thing.
That is a big issue.
Alex and Mike Jones...
Mike Jones.
Alex and Mike Adams can throw around all they want, all this talk about how they've been infiltrated by communists in their front for China, and they can have fun with that.
But the reality is, if they operated, the World Health Organization operated in a way that Mike and Alex wanted them to, the situation would be so much worse.
And not just that, but it doesn't make any sense from China's standpoint, because if you want good PR, if you're China...
You do a good job.
Now that this is becoming so global that everybody is going to have to deal with it in some fashion or another, the only thing that makes sense for China to come out of this in a positive light is for them to have done everything possible as well as they possibly could.
Anything less than that and the world will be like, we can never trust you again.
So if you understand what he's saying, he's basically making the argument that knowledge is knowing things and wisdom is connecting things because you feel like it.
I was drawn to philosophy, but I really didn't like a lot of the elements of how you can have a good argument for or against something, and a lot of times it's pretty arbitrary which side you decide to argue for.
It was a very formative stretch of classes I took with this dude.
One day, we were going over some of the homework problems and discussing things, and someone else in the class was like, I think that this argument is invalid.
I feel like it is, but I'm going through it, and it looks like it's valid.
And so Professor Weirich got up, and he was diagramming it on the board, and he went through all of it, all the steps, and showed that it was invalid.
And as he was finishing up the conclusion, he's like, and so, to sum up...
Sometimes you must not distrust your intuition.
So there was this interesting moment where you're in a formal logic class and this guy is diagramming the sentence and at the same time the lesson that's derived from it is sometimes...
Your intuition is guiding you in the right direction.
You got, like, people on Fox News talking about, like, maybe the unviability or the questions about some of Bernie's policies and the funding and all that stuff.
Alex comes in for a remote and he's like, my big problem is its followers want to lick me.
I have no idea exactly what video Mike is talking about, but I suspect that it's one that's been circulating since at least January 28th when it was covered by the South China Mornings.
It's exactly what Mike is describing.
It's large buildings in Wuhan at night.
And you can hear screaming and yelling.
It sounds pretty off-putting without translation.
However, with subtitles, you learn that what people are yelling are words of encouragement to their fellow citizens.
They're yelling, quote, stay strong and, quote, keep it up, Wuhan, essentially rallying the people to keep morale high in a difficult situation.
Mike should know what these people are saying.
He's claimed on multiple occasions to speak Chinese, so he shouldn't even need subtitles.
My suspicion is that he absolutely does know what that video shows, but also recognizes its power as a propaganda tool, and so does Alex.
That's why he gets super excited about the video and he wants to see it.
It's not out of concern for people who are caring about the situation.
It's because he knows he can use it to scare his audience into buying his shit.
When you take these deranged, lunatic, violent leftists who are already mentally ill, I mean, they're already gone, and you add a quarantine to that, what's going to happen?
To their state of mental health, what are they then willing to do in terms of violence or looting or murder or killing or rape or pedophilia or all the things that they do almost on an everyday basis anyway?
Add the coronavirus to that, you start looking at the downfall of society.
It's so weird, but he's trying to build this up as some sort of otherworldly...
Crazy people thing.
And I think largely that's because Alex understands that a lot of his audience is never going to engage with or have any occasion to be at a Bernie rally.
And so they'll just believe these, oh, aren't they?
He was just wandering around the outskirts bothering people, so his imagery about 25,000 people who have shit their pants wanting to kill him is being a little overly dramatic, I think.
Also, Bernie's campaign put the attendance of that rally in Austin at 12,700, so Alex is just making shit up about that, too.
Alex is a liar about everything because those lies are useful to him to use to drive sales for his products.
You don't see that dude punch the security guard in the footage.
As far as I can tell, unless there's some other angle of this that is like...
Magically shows that.
I don't believe this.
Because the video that they do have does show Owen hitting the guy with the bullhorn over his security guard, pulling the bullhorn back, and that's when the security guard's head goes back.
It's very clear from the General Hao Ping article a couple of decades ago that they were planning on using chemical weapons to depopulate America.
As I've long said, even with their nuclear preemptive strike on military targets, they don't want to hit cities per se.
They want to blackmail the West into submission so that they can take the land, have the economy, have the granaries and the other things which the U.S. provides without destroying the infrastructure.
So, like I mentioned at the beginning of the show, Alex is going to be gone for the rest of the week because he's going to CPAC, which I should actually correct.
He's going to a fringe event.
Sort of like, you know, whenever there's WrestleMania, there'll be like side shows.
Other wrestling promotions will come and put on shows.
This event that Alex is speaking at is organized by National File, which is run by his employee, Tom Papert.
The list of speakers who are set to complain about being kicked off social media include Alex, Owen Schroer, Millie Weaver, and the former head of the Proud Boys, Gavin McGinnis, as well as the current head of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio.
This is a list of really embarrassing people to have be your marquee speakers.
And even among that crew of creeps and weirdos, Alex and his associates are too foul to be let in.
They're really the margins of the margins.
And it really does feel like it's only a matter of time before they're forced to accept the reality that the Trump movement or whatever that shit is does not want them.
They want acceptable, toned-down con men like Glenn Beck.
They don't want self-aggrandizing lunatics like Alex who will make everything about themselves and honestly can't be trusted.
I could also see him somehow deluding himself into believing that if only he did this, or if only Trump said this, or if only he got the ear of the right guy.
I engaged in quite a rant a few days ago when the major Israeli newspapers came out and called Nick Foyntes a white nationalist and was praising the fact that he was being deplatformed off the internet.
Anyway, Nick Fuentes is absolutely a white nationalist.
I've heard him do his shtick enough that it's very clear that he's 100% a white nationalist who just really doesn't want to be called that.
Because much like Alex, he wants to be accepted.
In the same way Alex is fighting a doomed campaign to take over the Trump community entirely, Nick Fuentes is also engaged in a battle to take down Turning Point USA so he can shift the college conservative world super far to the extreme right.
In order to have any success in that endeavor, he knows he can't just openly call himself accurate things.
That'll scare off the potential recruits.
Nick Flandes, on many occasions, has made arguments against non-white immigration to the United States.
He's argued that Jim Crow era was better for both blacks and whites and has held a consistent position that America should be a white homeland.
He does not disagree with any of the things that define a white nationalist.
He just doesn't like the term because it's bad for business.
Quote, the reason I wouldn't call myself a white nationalist, it's not because I don't see the necessity for white people to have a homeland and for white people to have a country.
It's because I think that kind of terminology is used almost exclusively by the left to defame.
And I think the terminology and the labels that we use, I don't think we can look at them outside the context of their connotation in America.
He only really has a problem with being called a white nationalist because the left calls him that and he knows that it tarnishes his ability to trick unsuspecting youths into thinking that isn't what he's about.
When Alex Jones is doing here, what he's doing is he's engaging in platforming and covering for an explicit white nationalist holocaust denier, which should surprise no one.
So, Alex, you know, it's interesting that he's going to CPAC.
It's interesting how bad his instincts are, too, because this isn't the way to go.
I know you want to co-opt things, and sure, Nick Fuentes is going to get a lot of press, like he did at the Turning Point thing that Ben Shapiro was speaking at when he videotaped himself trying to confront Ben Shapiro while Shapiro was holding his baby, trying to walk to a hotel with his family, and Nick Fuentes followed him.
He got a lot of press for that, but that's not good.
It's been completely co-opted by the Trump cult, and it's fascinating to see Nick Fuentes try and portray this list of people, including a fuckton of Trump administration officials and at least three members of the Trump family.
The reason for this is very obvious.
Trump isn't even Trump to people like Nick.
To him, Trump was a symbol of the coming back of an open white supremacist culture.
The promise of a Trump presidency was that of a return to a time when all social power rested in the hands of straight white men.
And so when he says never Trumper, he means people who aren't loyal to that symbol.
To Nick Fuentes, Trump himself could be a never Trumper because he could fail to live up to the goals of this movement.
This is why it might seem incoherent to call an event dominated by Trumpism never Trump.
For simply refusing to disavow me and the Groypers and other young America first conservatives, YAF fires her and tells her you're not allowed to speak anymore.
We And so increasingly it's being difficult, or it's become difficult, excuse me, it's become difficult for America First, real, outside, dissident, right-wing types to organize anywhere.
So Michelle Malkin is someone who's been in the conservative grift space for a long time.
And it's interesting to see how tenuous your position can be, even with tenure.
When the grift is done with you, it's done with you.
Her speaking engagements were managed by a group called the Young America's Foundation, which also manages events for all sorts of conservative folks, from Dinesh D'Souza to Ben Shapiro.
As it turns out, Ben Shapiro makes them a lot more money than she does, because when she decided to side with Nick Fuentes in his war against Ben Shapiro, Young America's Foundation dropped her from their talent roster.
Part of the problem is that she got confrontational about Shapiro's derision of Fuentes in a speech in front of the Young America's Foundation, which again also represents Shapiro's...
This is how this stuff works.
When the grift is done with you, you find the next grift and you keep moving.
And sometimes it's sad.
Everything else in that clip is just Nick Fuentes complaining about how no one wants to be associated with him, which makes sense.
I know that it does make things harder, and it's more difficult to do business when people know what kind of a crypto-fascist bigot you are.
But people saying that they don't want to rent you a space to hold a bigot rally in, that's not an encroachment of your free speech.
I think it's probably not a great idea for Alex to use the word we when he's talking about him and Nick giving people what they want.
That's either a clear indication that Alex Jones often has literally no idea who he's talking to or that he wants to be associated with someone like Nick Fuentes.
It's really hard to tell which is the case, but you better believe that if he's ever confronted with some of the stuff that Nick says on his own platforms, Alex will immediately call him controlled opposition like he does with Richard Spencer.
That is the route that this would go if Alex was confronted with all of the stuff that Nick does.
You know, people have said that it could line up with something like a workers' party, like you could have the working and middle class of all the different groups of people.
You know, for someone who doesn't want people to think he's similar to a Nazi, Nick sure seems to invite a lot of comparisons when you're choosing our parties.
But yeah, there's apparently a deep history here of not liking Michelle Malkin to the point of assault with another security guard, which also seems to be like a pattern.
So Alex's theory, or not theory, I guess, but the way he's been pitching things for this entire episode is that I heard you were doing this thing around CPAC.
And so National File, Tom Papert, my employee, was running another event.
And I was like, okay, yeah, let's do that and get Nick Fuentes for it.
He is operating under the assumption that National File tried to get Nick to be a part of their rally.
Okay, because when they were asking me like a week ago to go, and I love the guys over there, and I even said, hey, let me sponsor, because they were getting a smaller event.
And I said, hell, for like 20 grand more, you can get a bigger one.
Jordan, a thousand points of information are coming together for me, and my wisdom is telling me that even Tom Pepper was kind of like, I don't know if I want this asshole involved in our event.
So, as it turns out, at the 2008 DNC, Alex got into a little fight with Michelle Malkin.
According to Westworld, he started yelling at her, which caused her to try and flee, but Alex kept harassing her and following her, yelling, quote, shame on you, you little monster, you little fascist piece of trash.
I guess his beef with her is about a YouTube video that was coming around around that time that was of a soldier throwing a puppy off a cliff in Iraq.
I have no idea what the deal is with that video, but I do know that Infowars wrote a lot of articles about how Michelle Malkin was denying U.S. military atrocities in the war on terror because she didn't condemn the video, or I guess I think she speculated that it was a stuffed animal.
But I should also point out that I haven't heard Alex say anything about Trump pardoning war criminals, one of whom was charged with, quote, shooting at civilians for sport.
Another was charged with ordering the murder of two unarmed Afghan villagers.
Let this be a teachable moment.
When you're not on Alex's team, questioning a video of a soldier throwing a dog off a cliff makes you a fascist piece of trash.
When you are on Alex's team, when you pardon literal monsters who've been charged with war crimes, it doesn't even come up.
I needed to do a larger publicity stunt than National File was aiming to do, so I paid $20,000 that's coming from the listeners for a larger ballroom to satisfy my ego.
Also, the reason that he doesn't cover the Weinstein conviction is because it runs counter to his narratives about how these elite globalist types never get punished.
I'm not sure exactly what this article is purporting to show, other than possibly that Jane Sanders knows some people who work at a PR company that her husband's campaign uses.
I don't know.
That's nothing compared to what Trump has been doing.
According to the Washington Examiner, Trump's campaign, quote, steered more than $190,000 in campaign contributions to Trump-owned properties, businesses, and family members in the fourth quarter of 2019.
The virus shit, the economy, the fucking everything is a complete and utter...
The video that shows a thing that's the opposite of the thing that he's calling it to your face.
This show is, if you are a listener of this show, you might as well just walk up to Alex and let him slap you in the face and then go back to the end of the line to wait for it to happen all over again.