One of the best things about X recently is the community notes checking, checking journalists and politicians in real time with facts.

It is okay for you without investigating. To report someone else's accusation as truthful?

To report their reporting as authentic and truthful? Yes. If I believed it was Mount Rushmore and they told me it was Mount Rushmore and showed a picture, I'd show their picture. And do it without any further checking? Myself, at that moment in time, if I believed it was Mount Rushmore, why would I not believe the DNC?

Well, for instance, the photo of my client that we're here about today, you had never seen that before going on air? No. You had never reviewed any of those materials? No, it was just sitting on the desk. And you knew that there would be materials sitting on the desk? Yeah, there are materials sitting on the desk. And you may not have seen them or checked them before? No.

I made a lot of crazy claims to you, and you said 99% of them you could actually find were actually accurate, and then the few times I had just kind of twisted something or flipped it and got it backwards, then we were able to find out what I was actually saying.

As it turns out, the number comes from a report put out by... the French Ministry of the Interior, which does say that there were 1,063 anti-Christian acts in France in 2018.

So in this next clip, we get back to Wolfgang Halbig and that whole situation. And they basically get Alex to admit that he didn't fact-check Wolfgang at all, really. Right. But in the same breath, Alex is presenting it as, like, he wants it to appear that he tried to, which is weird.

So Alex is lying about this story entirely. What a shock. Three stories in a row about money. He's completely lying about to make his point that it's illegal to use money.

All of the verifiable sources that he's ever cited have not said what he says they say, but I don't know about his secret sources.