I find very little credibility or credence to what Bill is reporting, based on contemporary public reports. It really feels like he's creating a straw man of bad reporting to compare himself to in order to make himself look like good reporting.

This is legitimately just a knee-jerk reaction of denialism with no proof behind it. He can't prove that this wasn't a fertilizer bomb, and yet he is.

There's no way he'd be so insistent that I research these things if he knew that when I did, I'd realize he's making shit up. It's basically just a bluff.