Today, to supplement their coverage of Alex Jones, Dan and Jordan begin an exploration of how things played out on Bill Cooper's radio show The Hour of the Time on the days immediately following the bombing of the Murrah building in Oklahoma City. This installment covers the day of the bombing, April 19, 1995, as well as April 20-21.
It's the sort of thing where we've been focusing on that a lot more.
And I realize that in terms of my workflow and the way things go, it doesn't make sense to have a Wednesday episode that's dedicated to something else.
And as such, we've kind of just like, there'll be long stretches of episodes where we don't have anything other than Alex Jones.
And that's not really the template of what this show should be, I don't think.
In everyone's best interest to probably try to do something else.
Now, what I mean by getting rid of Wacky Wednesday is I just don't think Wednesday works very well for that.
Monday works much better.
And here's why.
When we do our episodes that come out on Friday, generally speaking, we can have up to Thursday covered from Alex's show, which only leaves us Friday's show to cover on Monday.
So it leaves us in a lurch, in a situation where we'd be much better served, trying to do something off the beaten path for Monday, and then Wednesday and Friday, Alex.
So I'm going to generally do that, but some Mondays might also still be Alex.
But anyway, the point is, this isn't an Alex episode.
If you're out there listening and you're thinking, hey, I enjoy this show, I'd like to support what these gents do, you can do that by going to our website, knowledgefight.com, clicking the button to support the show, or if you'd like to, you can take that generosity and throw it at a charity in your area that helps folks who are in need.
And I think part of that is because we're dunking on Alex and we're making fun of him in juxtaposition with this guy who he looked up to.
And so maybe there's a little bit of a vested interest in not treating him as roughly as we treat Alex because it's like, hey Alex, this guy is your hero.
You suck compared to him.
And that's maybe an irresponsible way for us to present the source material and who this guy is.
I had avoided it a little bit, as we've done a couple of Bill Cooper episodes, because I felt like there was stuff that was more fun.
Like, the idea that he wanted to buy Gannett is hilarious.
But ultimately, that is not a fair picture of Bill Cooper.
Right.
So I felt like one of the things that I've gotten a lot of requests from people to do is get into the Oklahoma City bombing and Bill Cooper's coverage of it.
of going over Bill Cooper and his broadcast, The Hour of the Time, and how conspiracy theories about the Oklahoma City bombing developed over the course of it.
Hey, look, I said we weren't talking about Alex Jones.
I didn't say it wasn't going to be unpleasant.
And as I like to do, when we talked about the Boston bombing, I wanted to make sure that we try and stay as respectful as possible of the fact that this was a gigantic tragedy that affected so many people's lives.
And, you know, 168 people lost their lives.
And, you know, you just sort of umbrella that out to family and friends, co-workers.
The number of people who are severely traumatized by the events of April 19th are not something that I feel comfortable making jokes about.
Yeah.
But at the same time, we are going to make jokes about Bill Cooper and none of it is meant to disrespect the people.
A thousand years from now, I want patriots somewhere, and I mean patriots to principles and ideals of liberty and freedom, to remember the Waco Massacre.
Unfortunately, it appears that someone is using this anniversary to promote An agenda.
We will be discussing that.
But for right now, there's a vote coming up on the Conference of States in Minnesota.
So when I went back to listen to the period of time on Bill Cooper's show after this bombing, the one thing I didn't expect was for him to get on air on April 19th, mention the bombing, insinuate that it's a false flag, and then completely sideline it to talk about something else entirely that's more pressing to him.
So here we have Bill warning his audience about a vote in Minnesota about a conference of states.
This is absolutely not a situation where it's a vote of the public.
It's something that's being done in the Minnesota legislature, since Bill says it passed the state house and it's going to the Senate.
One essential problem is that Bill doesn't ever give a bill number or name on this, so it left me in a little bit of a pickle.
When you just Google Minnesota and Conference of States, nothing really helpful comes up, which basically meant that I got to go to the Minnesota State Legislature's website and go over all the bills passed by the House and Senate in Minnesota 1995.
There were 265 total, and thanks to this exercise, I learned some interesting things.
That is an instance of me lying.
This was not fun or interesting as a path of exploration, because you know what?
Pretty much all these legislative bodies do is allocate funds for projects like fixing roads and slightly adjusting wording in bills about rules regarding things like building codes.
In 1995, it seemed like there was a fair amount of bridge naming related business in the Minnesota legislature.
I understand things like truth and consequences in New Mexico, but Embarrass?
All right.
So there was absolutely no bill, even close to what Bill is talking about, that passed the Minnesota House or Senate in 1995.
What Bill is talking about is the idea of states calling for a constitutional convention, where they would invoke Article 5 of the Constitution, which allows a convention of states to ratify new amendments with a three-fourths vote of the states.
This has never been done in the history of the country, and no one really knows how it would play out if states were to actually go down this road, but it's been a fear and rallying cry for folks on the extreme right for years, depending on...
It seems like it would become a political football.
Yeah, yeah.
So obscure ways that people can change or affect the Constitution are a preoccupation of people in the militia, patriot, constitutionalist world, so you can kind of understand where this drive comes from to paint things this way.
According to Article 5, state legislatures initiate this process, if they were to go down this road, by introducing resolutions.
In 1995, only three resolutions passed the Minnesota House or Senate.
One, SF-66, was about deficit reduction.
Another, HF957, was about abandoning the sale of the administration of power services for the western area of the state.
The last, HF821, was about the funding for Amtrak.
Interestingly, there was a big piece scaremongering about this very thing, the rising tide of Conference of States bills and state legislatures, in the April 1995 issue of the Phyllis Schlafly Report.
So the reality behind what's going on is that the National Governors Association had been trying to organize what you might call a town hall-style gathering of representatives from state legislatures called a Conference of States, which was twisted by conspiracy theorists into being a plan to stage a constitutional convention.
This wasn't really, strictly speaking, true, but folks like Schlafly and Bill Cooper were able to convince enough people this was part of the plot to turn the U.S. into a communist hellhole.
So the plan was absolutely an effort to assert states' rights that almost paradoxically was torpedoed in part by the conspiracy theories of people who yell states' rights the loudest.
Michael Levitt, then governor of Utah and one of the primary proponents of the plan, looked back on the effort as a bold vision that adapted to the times.
In the 1994 midterms, Republicans had a really good showing and ended up in control of all of Congress, a majority of the state governorships, and control of many state legislatures.
After that point, people like Levitt, who were previously calling for this Conference of States to assert states' rights, felt like they didn't need to go that route anymore.
And with the mechanisms of government in Republican hands, they could try that approach.
Levitt literally said himself, As the new legislative agenda unfolded, those of us who had organized the Conference of States could see momentum had shifted in a direction we approved of, but in a fashion different than we had anticipated.
We recalibrated the Conference of States effort into a far less grand vision, wrapped it up, and focused our energies on legislative proposals which would return more control of the nation's welfare system and Medicaid to state control.
By April 1995, Bill Cooper is fighting against a fake version of an idea that really isn't in play in any meaningful way.
The people who were pushing for it as a last resort against Bill Clinton got the power they wanted inside government, so this move wasn't really important to them anymore.
I can find no solid evidence that a resolution like this passed the Minnesota House in 1995, but even if it did, the idea of a conference of states was already pretty much dead in the water by this point.
It was only really being kept alive by conspiracy theorists who wanted to use it to stoke fears of the destruction of the Constitution.
Sure.
unidentified
The GOP had taken power in the federal government, so they weren't really interested in that play anymore, at least not until the next time Democrats get in control of Congress, which was, hold on, let me check my notes.
This morning, just after most of the workers had entered the federal office building in Oklahoma City and prepared for their daily routine, an explosion occurred.
No one was prepared for this, ladies and gentlemen, least of all those inside the building who found themselves suddenly falling, tumbling through the air.
Many of them were buried beneath tons of debris.
As usual, The intelligence service has all of the facts that are available at this time, and you will find these facts have not been reported in their entirety anywhere else in the world, including the major media in the United States, including even the media in Oklahoma City.
So you can see here this anti-media tendency that's so common among the right wing these days, alive and well in the mid-90s in the militia patriot community.
It's of note that the way Bill is expressing these things isn't fully saying that the media is evil, just that his intelligence-gathering team is far more competent and have dug up the real story.
This is part of the trend that's very universal among people like Bill or Alex Jones.
It's key for them to invalidate all other sources of information than themselves, particularly things that could potentially contradict their version of reality.
So, in this next clip, Bill tells us that he's got people on the scene and that there's a lot of rumors out there, and you've got to separate those from the truth.
There's one thing that Bill takes particular issue with, and actually he complains about on the 20th, and I think again on the 21st, and that is reporting of death tolls and estimates about death tolls.
He seems to really be staking a claim on this hill as, like, this is the proof of the media lying or something.
The national news reports, especially on ABC, are completely...
Off base and out of line.
As you might expect, the body count keeps going up, but as far as actual on-the-scenes reporting goes, at 4.30 p.m. this afternoon, Oklahoma time, only 22 confirmed dead, 17 of them children from the daycare center.
Washington was reporting 81 dead, but no one on the scene can confirm any numbers yet.
You know, whenever there's a mass casualty event, there's inevitably estimates that go around about the death toll, which almost always end up being higher than the eventual concrete number.
Like, I remember people throwing around numbers in the tens of thousands about 9-11 on that day, which sounded possible, given that two gigantic buildings in the middle of New York City had just fallen.
If you want to take preliminary estimates of death as being some kind of conspiracy, I guess you can, but that's some weak shit.
The bombing of the Murrah building resulted in 168 deaths, so it's not like the number he's citing from what he appears to have heard on ABC News is actually high.
Bill doesn't cite where his number of 22 dead comes from, and based on how his reporting generally goes, it's probably just something one of his listeners told him, which he then gets to call his intelligence service.
An article from April 19th in the United Press International says the bombing killed, quote, an undetermined number of people.
And the article goes on to say, quote, dozens, perhaps hundreds of people died in the blast.
The governor's office put the confirmed death toll at 26 late Wednesday, but the number was expected to rise as rescuers searched the wreckage.
This same article quotes the then-governor Frank Keating, saying that, quote, he had heard as many as 40 people were dead, but said that had not been confirmed.
They also quote a doctor at one of the triage centers who told UPI, quote, they have found 80 people, but only two were alive, so they told us to go home.
That would put the death estimate at 78, but the article also is clear that, quote, the medical workers' report could not be confirmed.
I don't know what precise reporting it is that Bill Cooper is mad about in terms of death estimates, but it seems entirely likely to me that when he says Washington was reporting 81 dead, It could have been media reports like things about that triage doctor, where responsible media qualify it as not being confirmed and it's an estimate.
Either way, this feels like a cheap way for him to play games that surround the idea that he's more careful than other media, and thus more trustworthy, which is kind of dishonest.
Anyone reporting on this story as it unfolded on April 19th would obviously know that it would be impossible to have a concrete number of fatalities for quite a while.
And even Bill's 22 number of confirmed deaths contradicts the UPI reporting of 26. Yeah.
When Bill says 4.30 p.m., that makes me think that what he's talking about is a press conference that Bill Clinton and Janet Reno held to brief reporters on the status of things.
Because that was the time that they had that presser.
In this conference, Clinton gives a very brief statement and doesn't take any questions.
Then Reno gets up and discusses the police response and investigation, though she will not comment on things that would hinder the investigation itself, so discussion of suspects or methods of the attack are off limits.
As Reno is taking questions, this exchange happens.
unidentified
We have some statistics on the casualties, but they are increasing every moment.
What we are trying to do is to make sure that we pursue every lead.
What we have been told is that there were 550 people assigned in the building.
Only 250 had been accounted for before I came in.
There may be as many as 100 to 250 more people to account for.
The casualty figures are climbing.
100 victims have been treated.
Six children who were in the daycare center have been confirmed as dead.
And we are just pursuing absolutely every lead that we can.
That was the statement from Washington as of 4.30 p.m. on April 19th.
And it doesn't sound anything like what Bill is saying.
Janet Reno didn't say that 81 people were dead.
There's just an acknowledgement that the number is going up, there's no commitment to a specific figure, and there's a recognition that a lot of people are unaccounted for as of that time.
That's not her saying that those people are dead, just that with the work of tracking down all the folks who could have been in the building had not been completed yet.
I find very little credibility or credence to what Bill is reporting, based on contemporary public reports.
It really feels like he's creating a straw man of bad reporting to compare himself to in order to make himself look like good reporting.
Immediately after the explosion, ladies and gentlemen, the shopping mall at Northwest 50th and 10 was evacuated because it houses a smaller office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
No mention was made of sealing off any areas in Norman, which is 17 miles south of Oklahoma City.
In particular, the office of the FBI, which is located about four blocks from the front door of one of our operatives.
So the problem with the information Bill is presenting is that there are two different malls at the intersection of Northwest 50th and Pennsylvania Avenue in Oklahoma City.
One is the Penn Square Mall, which is a mall like you might conceive of a shopping mall.
It's indoors and it's home to stores like JCPenney and Dillard's.
The other is a big office complex called 50 Penn Place right across the street.
In the aftermath of the bombing, both of these malls were evacuated because there are some FBI offices on the top couple floors of 50 Penn Place, the office building, not the shopping mall.
This was done as a precaution, and it may look like it's suspicious if you want it to, but the same person making that argument about suspicion would probably scream about the malls not being evacuated if, God forbid, there had been another bombing.
The way Bill's presenting this, it almost sounds like there's a shopping mall where you have an Orange Julius next to an FBI substation.
Norman is like a 25 minute drive away from Oklahoma City and the satellite office is in a strip mall that has a bunch of other tenants.
If you were operating off an assumption that the target might be, but not definitely was, but might be someone attacking federal authorities, you would be putting lives at risk unnecessarily if you didn't cover your bases.
I don't see anything weird about the things Bill is pointing to as weird so far.
And honestly, this section of the show revealed something to me that I've already touched on a little bit, but I didn't realize until this point in the episode.
When Bill is reporting this stuff about there being a closure in Norman, he says it's near one of his intelligence gathering people's houses.
And that made it clear that I should have realized this already, but...
A lot of the times, Bill, like, he sounds like he's reading a large passage from a book or, like, a newspaper article.
He's actually reading an email from one of his listeners.
That's all it is.
He speaks in this authoritative voice because he believes that everything one of his listeners tells him is intel as opposed to just being possibly inaccurate gossip.
This little wrinkle is something that makes Bill's show harder to decipher for me.
When I'm listening to him make a claim that sounds absurd, should I even try to track down where it comes from?
It's possibly based on some news item, but it might also just be a listener email, in which case there's nothing I can do with that.
It's a bad way to operate, mostly because Bill doesn't differentiate concrete reporting from listener emails explicitly, which introduces confusion.
When UPI reported on the triage doctor's claim that there were 78 people dead that they had seen, they were clear to point out that this number...
You know, it hasn't been confirmed.
So the reader has the ability to hear the perspective of the doctor that had been interviewed, while at the same time understanding that the specifics weren't verified and should not be taken as such.
Reputable media outlets operate in such a way as to help the audience make more informed decisions.
And one of the important aspects of that is being upfront about, you know, how solid some of your information is.
I suspect that Bill doesn't call out the fact a lot on his show that his shit is mostly listener emails, because he doesn't kind of expose that his journalistic endeavor is more theater than journalism.
It's more fun to imagine that he has people observing, you know, like, my guy who's only four blocks away from the FBI office, you're like, ooh, is somebody always watching the FBI office?
Tinker Air Force Base was put on emergency alert, and for several hours, no one was admitted on or off the base.
Later in the day, base personnel were allowed onto the base, but everyone entering was subjected to a total identification check, and some were searched.
She tried, entering the area from several different possible back roads, routes, but there were simply too many police, National Guard, Highway Patrol, and Sheriff's deputies to get anywhere near the scene, despite the fact that she possesses a valid press pass and credentials.
representing the Cajie News Service and Veritas newspaper.
unidentified
Every little alleyway and gravel half-road that she tried to access was fully guarded and sealed.
So, first of all, I don't believe this listener that Bill has actually possesses a valid press pass.
I don't know what the standards are for getting universal press passes, but it seems like I provide information for a conspiracy show on shortwave radio and the host's zine might not make the cut.
Seems like that might be like, I don't know about that.
By 9.14 a.m., aerial shots of the building were being transmitted on TV, and coverage was continuous.
But it totally makes sense that the police and other groups who were making a perimeter would do whatever they could to make sure there weren't just hundreds of reporters of ranging credibility wanting to be a person.
Also, this is an interesting tale that Bill has about one of his people infiltrating the bomb site.
Obviously cell phones weren't to the level that they are today back in 1995, but there were cell phones.
This person who had gotten into the site probably would be able to call Bill at any point if they had a cell phone, presuming that there wasn't just the normal lack of signal problem that comes from any time that there are lots of people trying to make calls in the same area simultaneously.
That's not the government jamming signals like Bill is trying to insinuate.
At 10 a.m., Southwestern Bell began adding channel capacity to their cell capabilities, particularly for the area of downtown Oklahoma City.
To make the problem of not getting a signal less likely to occur for people trying to find their loved ones or just trying to make a call.
And this work was completed by 2.15pm.
To get some idea of the overloading that was going on at the time, between 9.02 and 11 a.m., Southwestern Bell recorded over 12 million calls attempted in the city.
I'm sure there were some bans of frequency that were dedicated to emergency responders, but that really has no bearing on whether or not a guy Bill knows who snuck into the Murrah building site would be able to call Bill and then tell him what he saw.
That story does not make sense, and also it kind of leads me to believe that Bill, whether intentionally or just instinctually, is trying to craft more conspiracy into this story than a straight-up reporter might.
So real quick, when he says the only other people are medical folks, the people he was talking about before this...
Are people who work for, like, utility companies, like gas companies, because they've got to shut off gas to the surrounding area in order to make sure there isn't a gigantic explosion.
Of the reason, no members of the local press who were not on the scene within the first hour have been allowed in since the rumor spread of a first, of a second, and then a third possible bomb.
These rumors are not true.
At that time, everyone in the downtown area who did not have a medical fire or police function was moved back away from the federal building area a distance of five blocks.
So, first of all, there's no legitimate reason for non-essential people to be allowed anywhere near that building.
It might be too much possibly to say absolutely no press, but in the circumstances that were going on where people were trapped in the rubble and search and rescue triage work was going on to the level it was, it makes complete sense to really only let in a few members of the media.
I'm pretty sure that more than just medical personnel were allowed in, like people who had a good reason to be there.
But here's what I'm guessing happened.
Bill's listener tried to get in, and the guard wouldn't let them.
The guard said something like, unless you have a medical card, you're not getting through, which gets translated to reporting that only people with medical cards are allowed in.
That seems like the game of telephone that's being played here.
Either way, I really do appreciate that Bill is on the side of saying that the bomb scares that happened after the initial explosion were not real bombs.
I'm sure he's going to have a terrible take on this, but at least at this point he doesn't seem to think there were actually more bombs, which is not the case with some Oklahoma City conspiracy theorists.
At 10.28am, there was a rumor of a possible explosive in the building, and everyone fell back.
Obviously, even if you think the odds are unlikely, you have to take it seriously when there's the possibility of another bomb.
The all-clear went out at 11.22am, and rescue efforts continued.
Then, at 1.30pm, searchers found a suspicious crate, and the building was once again evacuated at 1.48pm.
The bomb squad showed up and determined that it wasn't an explosive, so the all-clear came quicker this time and rescue efforts were back on track by 2.02pm.
It's just tragic and terrible the valuable time was lost in these rescue efforts, but the possible damage of not taking all precautions in a situation like that is almost unimaginable.
If you have tons of first responders and rescue teams in the building trying to help people and then a second bomb goes off, the physical and psychological blow that would cause would be staggering.
If I understand Bill's insinuation here, though, which he doesn't really spell out, but it definitely seems like this is what he's hinting at.
He seems to be saying that the bomb scares were fake, but not in the way that I think they were.
I think that they were fake in the sense that there weren't actual bombs, but the teams on the site didn't know whether they were real bombs or not and had to operate under the assumption that they might be.
Bill seems to believe that the bomb scares were fake in the sense that they were made up by the officials as a pretext to form a perimeter five blocks away from the building to keep the media out.
Yeah, the way that he's connected certain ideas to each other makes you look behind and you're like, I don't think you are disagreeing with me the way that I'm...
Can you imagine somebody in law enforcement where after a bomb goes off and they get a report of a possible second bomb, they're just like, Nah, my gut says this guy can only make one bomb.
Earlier reports were made of three possible suspects in a blue pickup truck with tinted windows, two of Middle Eastern appearance between the age of 25 and 35, and a third male, no description given.
Who supposedly was driving this pickup truck?
Nothing was said about why they were suspects.
But I question this, and so do our agents on the scene, for there is a large population of Middle Eastern Muslims in Oklahoma City, Edmond and Norman, and the University of Oklahoma has several large Islamic student community groups.
Unless the three men actually did something suspicious, There should have been nothing out of the ordinary about their presence.
Many such individuals live and work in this area, especially in that part of downtown Oklahoma City, which houses so many offices for Middle Eastern businesses.
But at least there are little moments like that where, I mean, I wish he would recognize or make more explicit the fact that, like, the reason for why they were...
But in a certain way, not putting that second step together is like, yeah, yeah, no, no, no, of course you should be racist towards these people, but it doesn't make any sense to do it now.
That's stupid.
Like, there's a certain part of, like, this is bad investigation on your part.
So real quick, when he said that these are some of the rumors and speculations, I found it incredibly confusing at first, because he's just done this part where he's like, the Air Force base has heightened security.
Is he talking about those rumors?
Yeah, are those the rumors, or are you about to say the rumors?
And I had to go back and listen to it a couple times, and I'm very certain.
He's saying that the things that were reported before, the Air Force Base, the FBI substation, all that stuff, that is not rumor.
A local television station in Oklahoma City received a call from an unidentified male, reportedly speaking with a foreign accent, who stated that the Nation of Islam claimed responsibility for the bombing.
Even if you preface them by saying they're just rumors and they aren't proven, like, it feels irresponsible.
Even if it appears to be, like, him really trying not to be, I just don't know what value it has to be, like, well, here's something that people have said.
So, Bill is reporting that this local station did receive this call, claiming that the Nation of Islam took responsibility, but he's not being precise with his own reporting.
This station in Oklahoma was KFOR, and after this anchor said that they'd received this call, another anchor said, quote, it could be a crank call.
They were not even reporting this as anything real themselves, but while we're on the subject...
Fuck them for saying that on air.
Even if they pointed out that it might be a crank call, go fuck yourself.
That doesn't bring anything to anybody.
That's some pretty irresponsible stuff.
And if Bill's only point was that some media outlets were putting out sloppy work, I'd probably be on very similar pages.
Dave McCurdy was a former Oklahoma congressman, and he did get on air, and he connected the bombing to Hamas, not to the Nation of Islam.
UPI reported on his comments, quote, My first reaction was there could be a very real connection to some of the fundamentalist groups operating around the city, the former congressman said.
He said a number of Muslim fundamentalist groups, some with links to Hamas, had recently held a convention in the area.
You begin to think that maybe Keiji is not good at detail work.
Another report from the scene stated that firefighters going through the rubble of the federal building discovered other explosive devices and plastic which had been allegedly kept in the offices of the ATF located in the federal building.
That's the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
That particular report, unlike all of the others heard today, was never reported again.
We've also not heard it mentioned further on the scanner.
It was an untrue rumor, or if it was true, was quickly squashed.
So this again is something that Bill is talking about in the context of this list of rumors, but you can hear the insinuation in his tone.
He's not reporting this as a rumor, and honestly, as far as rumors go, you shouldn't report them, unless you're explicitly debunking them and you make that very clear.
It's unhealthy to shruggingly report rumors and entertain the possibility that maybe they're true.
When you operate like this, the only real outcome that comes of it is the dumber elements of an audience.
Ignore the part where you say it's just a rumor and they come to accept the rumor is true.
Anyone listening has probably already heard these rumors somewhere already, so what's the value in repeating them and saying these are just rumors, they may or may not be true?
It's just lazy as hell and it doesn't bring it to you.
So the quote-unquote report of finding explosive parts in the rubble did not disappear, as Bill is imagining, and it actually dogged the ATF for quite a while.
In September 1995, they released a statement saying that they were, quote, absolutely no explosives in their office, and that there were a few things in the office that could be mistaken for explosives.
According to a 1996 article in the Washington Post, citing a Dallas ATF spokesman, quote, These items were not explosives, but rather devices designed for training purposes that never contained explosive materials.
He said these types of items are used as explanative props in court cases.
Obviously, you don't want to bring a fucking pipe bomb to court.
In Timothy McVeigh's trial, one of the bombs that was supposedly found was explained by Mike Shannon, the Special Operations Chief of the Oklahoma City Fire Department, as being, quote, A desk ornament from an ATF agent that was knocked into the stairwell.
A desk clock that had the appearance of a very typical type of what you'd see in a TV or comic strip of a bomb.
And it was in the stairwell and people were really nervous at the time.
These were the sort of things that were mistaken for possible bombs and then reported by media outlets that were eager to get out any possible news.
When you hear things like in the police scanner, the report of a possible second device found, you don't really know what all the details are, and it's easy to get the wrong impression.
Now, here's the thing.
Bill Cooper repeating a rumor about the ATF is not just a guy repeating a rumor for the sake of bringing erroneous news to the audience's awareness.
A later radio report made mention of a rocket launcher being found in the debris, which was supposed to have also been in the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms office.
That report also has never been repeated, substantiated, or denied.
The folks who were going through the debris did actually find a rocket launcher in the wreckage of the building.
There's even a picture of it in the final action report about the bombing.
It sounds completely outlandish that there would be a rocket launcher in the debris of a building, but it's important to remember there were multiple different law enforcement agencies that had offices there.
The DEA, Secret Service, and ATF all had regional offices in the building, so some of the stuff that would end up being found would obviously not be what you'd expect in a normal pile of debris.
Bill is exploiting the normal reaction a person would have to hearing about a rocket launcher being found in order to insinuate that something nefarious is going on.
He doesn't offer any explanation for why this find might not be as weird as it sounds.
He just repeats it as gossip that may be true and is being covered up, maybe!
Or maybe it's just bad intel.
It was true, and it's not that weird.
And no one was covering it up.
It was reported in the AP the next day, April 20th.
The hour of the time is brought to you, ladies and gentlemen, by Swiss America Trading.
We suggest that if you want protection of your assets against what is sure to come, and this is just a taste, those of you who have been listening to this broadcast for a long period of time, you know, many of you have already prepared.
As prediction after prediction comes true right on schedule, not because Oh, boy.
There are Russian agents in this country now supervising the disarmament of the United States of America, and we have people in Russia supervising supposedly their disarmament also.
This is just a gold sales pitch masquerading as coverage of what Bill thinks is coming in response to the Oklahoma City bombing.
And make no mistake about this, this is from the night of the bombing.
He's on air saying that there will be escalating terrorism, local anarchy, food shortages, and a financial collapse, and if you and your family don't have gold or silver to barter with, you're fucked.
This is as manipulative and evil as pretty much anything I've ever heard from Alex in terms of sales pitches, and I fucking hope Bill's gold sponsor paid well, because hearing that really put Bill into a different category for me.
I would like to think that Bill was above something like that, but clearly he's not.
He's willing to let his sensationalism run wild in a time when his audience is particularly confused and scared while trying to sell them gold, which is going to save them in the coming dark times.
Bill did call out that his show is sponsored by this gold sales operation, so at least it's a little more above board than Alex in terms of disclosure.
But that really doesn't matter in a context like this.
What he's doing is abusive sales practices.
And if that's in your moveset...
Every other move you have becomes very suspicious.
And the reason that he got the Manuel Noriega one wrong is because he thought that Manuel Noriega would have sovereign immunity and so the U.S. couldn't try it.
So Bill was in the, you know, like he's in the middle of this rant about how he's never been wrong about any prediction other than the Noriega one, which is meant to give credibility to his prediction of all the horrible stuff that's coming, which was only in order to strengthen his gold pitch.
He starts there saying that people other than heads of state who have sovereign immunity are diplomats, but that's going away.
Anyway, also, that document 7277 is a favorite of Alex's.
It's the thing he claims proves that the UN plans to disarm the United States.
We've talked about it a ton in the past, so just as a reminder, it was a plan that was proposed but never enacted in any way.
It was released in 1961 during a period of severe tension between the United States and the Soviet Union, where people felt that a nuclear war could arrive any day, and thus plans for peaceful de-escalation were sometimes a bit idealistic in conception.
And that was definitely the case with 7277.
The first stage of that proposed plan involves limiting the United States and Soviet armed forces to 2.1 million persons each, which definitely has not been done.
We're a little bit over that benchmark, but Russia's army is currently at about 3.5 million, so clearly that stage has not been met.
It's a plan that's a bit utopian, but it was proposed by us, has never been enacted, and was the product of Cold War desperation.
It's basically just lived on as a boogeyman of the hard right folks and the Minutemen and the John Birch Society as proof that the globalists want to take their guns when it wasn't even about individual disarmament to begin with had to do with states.
So this is where Bill's whole shtick completely falls apart, or at least it should for anyone who's paying attention.
Earlier, he was complaining about rumors flying around and seems to be particularly put off by people speculating about estimated death tolls.
But now, before his show is even over, he's clearly staking a claim that this was a false flag, which he has in no way proven.
Bill is comfortable deciding on the entire narrative and the overarching truth of the event with no proof at all, but demands someone prove exactly how many people died by 4.30pm or else they're out of line and being irresponsible.
There's a very serious disconnect here, and it's a problem.
The fact that Bill has clearly already decided on the day of the bombing that it was a false flag, you know, that's going to affect how he processes new information about it.
He has a predetermined conclusion already, and he's publicly declared where he's planting his flag.
Do you think he's going to go out of his way to debunk the claim he's already committed to based on years of supposed research that he's done?
This is a massive problem for me.
Bill presents himself as the guy who insists you do your research.
He's the guy who scolds his callers for repeating things they just heard somewhere.
He's the guy who complains about rumors in the aftermath of a tragedy, and yet here he is deciding with zero proof that this bombing was done to advance the New World Order.
It's just a really sad betrayal of what's supposed to be his brand.
Between this and the gold sales thing, you really start to see a different picture of Bill.
He's kind of the same piece of shit that all these guys are.
He's just a little bit more serious about himself.
So Bill's mad at the FBI about that, and because of that, he thinks that any involvement of the FBI in investigating the Murrow Building bombing is no good.
Around 5.30 p.m., our Washington people began meeting with the governor in the governor's mansion supposedly to get coordinated with the federal investigators sent in.
by Waco Reno, and the governor has announced that the entire investigation is now in the hands of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Should we cheer?
The last time anyone's lives were in the hands of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, they were burnt.
So, I mean, you can clearly tell that he's not coming from an unbiased place.
Whatever resentments and feelings that he has are definitely a big part of how he's interpreting events before he has any reason to think those things.
And that's pretty essential to understand.
And it really leads him to be sloppy as hell.
And it's really embarrassing when you start to look at some of the things that he's taking the time to make a point of, like this.
At 7 p.m., Oklahoma time, a call over the scanner reported packages discovered at the Medallion Hotel.
A request was made for a bomb dog to be taken to the hotel, but a search of the phone directory shows that there is no such hotel listed in the Oklahoma City phone book.
If anything transpires on that, we will, of course, let you know.
So I can't speak to whether or not Bill or his listeners were able to find the Medallion Hotel on the phone book, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that there is a Medallion Hotel in Oklahoma City at this point.
An article in The Oklahoman from October 29, 1996, discusses its reopening, its full reopening.
Some parts were shut down because they were in the middle of an $8 million renovation project.
I was even able to find a February 1995 article about the beginning of the renovation project, like that hotel exists.
There's a New York Daily News story from May 7, 1995, about how Tom Brokaw apparently got really mad at someone at the Medallion Hotel because they'd lost his reservations when he was there covering the bombing.
The petty image of that aside, this article also points out how the medallion stepped up in a major way and offered rooms to people who were injured in the bombing as well as rescue workers who really needed a place to stay.
So good for you, medallion.
In 1998, the medallion was bought by Capstar and it was renamed the West End Oklahoma City and it has since been renamed again in 2004 to the Sheridan.
Anyway, the point here is that Bill is reporting this news as if it's a gotcha moment.
They heard on the scanner that a bomb-sniffing dog was sent to the medallion, but they can't find it in the phone book.
And this is worth bringing up on the show?
All this proves is that his investigative team couldn't find a hotel that definitely exists in the phone book.
Did they not think to take a second step to figure out if the hotel was real?
Or did they just flip through a few pages and decide Bill needed to know about this?
So, you know, he's predicting that there's going to be more bombings, and it's going to bring in the New World Order, and then he goes to playing the bomb sound effect more.
So it's really hard to capture something like this by just playing clips, but I want to stress to you that at the end of this episode, Bill is making a very serious point of predicting that there will be more bombings as the New World Order brings in their utopian socialist tyranny.
This is an important point of the conspiracy that Bill is spinning about the event being a false flag.
This prediction essentially sets a condition where, if you see more bombings, Bill's credibility goes up.
This is a pretty common trick that scam folks and propagandists use, like when Alex says that there's going to be more mass shootings and somehow this prediction proves his assertion that the current mass shooting is a false flag.
I'll give Bill some points for difficulty, though.
Bombings are a bit less common than mass shootings in the Alex Jones time period, but it's the same behavior.
So, this is a really good example of how conspiracy theory works, and how it leads people astray, even if they think that they're operating as critical actors.
On his April 19th show, Bill announced his prediction that there would be more bombings, as the utopian socialists tried to bring in their authoritarian state.
And then, the next day, he finds a piece of news about another bombing, and this is enough to prove to him that his prediction was right, and thus he must be on the right track about the bigger picture, namely that the bombing was not the act of organic terrorism.
How could it possibly be a solitary terrorist attack if there was another bombing the next day?
You can easily see how if you didn't take a step back, this can be an attractive thinking pattern, but ultimately, it's a bad one.
The bombing in Prince Edward Island was done by a man named Roger Charles Bell, who wasn't actually arrested until December 1996, so Bill would have no idea who he was at this point at all when he's on air.
Bell was a disgruntled former teacher who decided to lash out in society by carrying out bombings.
He struck first in 1988 when he set off a pipe bomb in front of the provincial law court's building.
He laid low for six years, then bombed again, leaving a pipe bomb in a trash can in a Halifax park.
From this point, he seemed to escalate his pattern with this legislature bombing in April 1995, and then an attempted attack on a propane plant in Charlottetown in June 1996.
After his 1995 bombing, he began sending messages to the police using the alias Loki-7.
One of these messages that has been published since had a swastika as the header and the title, quote, toward a final solution.
The body of his message said, quote, the latest attack by Loki 7 was directed at the corporate welfare bums who are the masters of the thieving scoundrels in Canada's bought and paid for legislature in courts.
greedy businessmen, thieving politicians, and venal injustice officials may run, but they cannot hide.
Operations against these and other enemies of the people will be continued by Loki VII, Hyl Thor.
So after his botched 1996 propane plant bombing, police had narrowed down the list of suspects down to basically just him and had him under surveillance around the clock.
Bell would plead guilty to the bombings and be sentenced to 10 years in prison.
So yeah, this story is pretty well fleshed out, and it definitely wasn't on April 20th, 1995.
When Bill Cooper is on air making connections between the Oklahoma City bombing and this bombing in Prince Edward Island, he has absolutely no reason to do so, except that he wants to.
Right, right.
What was it?
There was one thing he did that with the Boston bombing.
Remember every time a piece of gun legislation was coming up in Congress, somebody would walk into a McDonald's somewhere and blow away a whole bunch of people?
So you see almost identical thinking patterns to Alex.
Like the shootings in the McDonald's are in order to facilitate those gun bills being passed, which must mean that they're orchestrated somehow by the globalist New World Order or whatever.
In the same way, this omnibus terrorism bill is sitting there, they do this, they bomb Oklahoma City in order to get this through.
Bill, who has said that he has never been wrong about predictions of future things, says that there's nothing that can be done to stop this bill.
The omnibus bill that Bill is talking about here is actually two bills, S-390 and S-761, and neither of them passed.
A watered-down compromise bill, the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, was passed the next year, but it's pretty hard to make the case that this omnibus bill was fast-tracked and immediately passed thanks to the fervor surrounding the Oklahoma City bombing.
This is how conspiracy thinking works.
There was a big bombing, and there was also an anti-terrorism bill being considered in Congress, and thus the two must be connected.
The bombing was done in order to guarantee the passage of the bill, which will give the globalists more control and ability to crush the militia patriots.
But then, the bill doesn't pass.
And that's the part that seems to never really be considered when crafting these theories.
The globalists have the power and ability to orchestrate an insanely elaborate bombing of a federal building and pull off a cover-up that would necessitate hundreds, if not thousands of people lying, many of them under oath.
But they can't rig the vote or pressure a few congresspeople into getting this bill passed?
The thing I hate about the right-wing terrorists in this country, like, terrorists in other countries claim shit that they didn't do, but all the right-wing terrorists in America are a bunch of fucking craven cowards, not even willing to accept responsibility for the terrorism that they love.
Because they're afraid of the appearance of the first shot.
Instead of being like...
Yes, there are elements within the community of acceptable beliefs that I might hold, like I like the Constitution, right?
There are elements of people who are attracted to the same thing who might do things that are really unacceptable, and we should take an audit of that, and we should try and find ways to do this better.
They could do that, or they could raise a collective shriek so loud that no one can even be allowed to talk about whether or not right-wing terrorism is real.
The insistence on creating an enemy to be against who is simultaneously all-powerful and incompetent, depending on what your narrative requires, creates inherently incoherent storylines.
But it doesn't matter.
By the time these two omnibus bills that Bill is using as proof that the New World Order did the Oklahoma City bombing die in committee, they aren't essential to the narrative anymore.
By that point, there will be tons of other stories.
Tons of other plates that are spinning so you don't notice when one drops.
And it's one of the essential pieces of why we're creating this suspicion.
But why have tens of thousands of military personnel, police officers, prison guards, reservists, National Guard, and Air Force personnel taken over the entire city of Oklahoma City?
He can't lead his audience to a conclusion, then deliver the conclusion is speculation and then just pretend I'm just saying this.
Like, I get I get this kind of thing.
And honestly, it's totally fine under normal circumstances.
If he wants to use this thin speculative insinuation to prove that some guy he doesn't like is evil, that's part of it.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Search and rescue operations are still going on as Bill speaks, and for some reason, he thinks it's appropriate to bat around ideas that this whole thing is a drill, while safely hiding behind a cowardly mask of feigned inquisitiveness.
Like, fuck this dude.
We've kind of gone light on him in the past, but the kid gloves are really off for me.
This isn't just some weird idiot who believes fake documents, loves the Beach Boys, and gets mad when he can't buy USA Today.
He's a real shithead and a very similarly tragedy-exploiting monster like Alex.
And I think it's really pretty clear when you start to look at these flashpoints.
It was also mentioned that the FBI had collected film or tape from several surveillance cameras mounted in parking lots of other surrounding buildings.
Why is he speculating about whether or not the public will see those surveillance tapes?
The only reason to do that is to implant in your audience the suggestion that the public will, in fact, not ever see those tapes.
In 2009, the FBI released some raw video of the day of the bombing, and other surveillance tapes have come out.
The key video that everyone would want, however, has been said to not actually exist.
In court, Richard Williams, the then-assistant building manager, testified that the cameras outside the Murrah building, quote, had not been operational for at least two years before the bombing.
That sounds pretty wild, but from my experience, a not insignificant number of security cameras you may see in places are props.
The movie theater where I used to work was one such place, and I've definitely heard stories about this from other folks.
This is a whole strategy a lot of businesses employ called dummy surveillance systems.
The goal is to put up expensive-looking cameras, which will have the same effect as real cameras in terms of deterring a criminal from robbing you.
If you appear to have a high-tech security system, oftentimes a would-be criminal just decides it's not worth the risk, and they choose another target.
You get the desired result, and you save a bunch of money.
This is actually a really bad plan because good criminals know the difference between a fake camera and a real one.
They can kind of tell.
There are little indications that can tell.
And then second, one of the things that I kept finding in articles was like, if you put up fake cameras, you might introduce a liability that you could get sued for.
But this isn't to say that that's what the Murrah Building was doing.
But it is, you know, conceivable that these cameras stopped working and they were never replaced because it wasn't a high priority until it suddenly became the highest priority.
I get how this detail would seem incredibly suspicious to conspiracy theorists, but it isn't a giant red flag to me.
There were some rumors going around that FBI agents were trying to sell surveillance video of the actual bomb going off to TV stations for $1 million.
But retired FBI agent Stephen Brannon testified that he investigated those claims and found them to be a hoax.
In addition, there was a Secret Service log from April 24th that contained a mention of a video showing multiple people exiting the Ryder truck before the bombing.
This has caused a widespread belief that the government is covering up the existence of this tape, but when a lawsuit was filed to force the release of it, it went nowhere.
Stacy Bauer Schmidt, the then assistant to the special agent in charge of the Secret Service Intelligence Division, explained that the log in question was a detailing of unconfirmed reports from the days at the beginning of the investigation.
This is a lot less concrete than it's made out to be.
There's a log of things that maybe had been discussed or heard, but many people who were actually involved in the investigation have testified that they have never seen such a tape.
It's possible that what's in that log is being misrepresented.
You need enough to get out of the country and have a decent life for a bit or something.
I don't know.
Yeah.
I agree.
Whenever it's a round number like that, it's weird.
So the function of Bill speculating like this is to make his audience predisposed to distrust whatever happens.
If no tapes are produced, that's not the result of there being no tapes or investigators keeping them as evidence for trial, because that, you know, obviously a reason that no tapes would be released for.
a long time from here.
It's not that.
It's proof that there's a cover-up.
Obviously.
unidentified
If some tapes are produced, they're most certainly part of the cover-up.
I can tell you from looking at the damage of that building and the great crater in front of the building that that was not made with a fertilizer soaked in diesel fuel bomb.
In fact, it's impossible.
Whatever did that damage was a fast-burning, high-explosive...
Of the type used only in military weapons.
And I have extensive experience with that kind of explosive from my time in Vietnam.
Any explosive expert can tell you this, ladies and gentlemen, and they'll tell you that I have just told you right on the truth.
Bill is just saying that he's looked at pictures and determined that this couldn't be a bomb made of fertilizer and fuel oil, which literally means nothing.
This is the exact same thing as Alex Jones looking at pictures from the Boston bombing and determining that some people he sees in them must be secret CIA agents because he knows a lot about secret CIA agent posture.
At this point, Bill has no information to go on to either support or reject the then-theory that the bomb was a fertilizer bomb.
He has no idea if the actual bomb had supplementary explosives added to them to make the blast larger.
There's a lot of possibilities.
This is legitimately just a knee-jerk reaction of denialism with no proof behind it.
He can't prove that this wasn't a fertilizer bomb, and yet he is.
Here he is, making a definitive statement about it to his audience.
If someone else did this about a conclusion Bill didn't like, he'd probably rant about how everyone believes unproven things and it's the death of common sense or some shit.
He allows himself to play the games that he critiques.
You can't tell what type of bomb went off just by looking at a few pictures if you're Bill Cooper.
The fire investigators, they've done so many investigations of their investigations and they're like, those guys have no fucking clue what they're talking about.
After he found a parking place, which was a genuine miracle, he was putting money in the parking meter and a civilian in a business suit walked past and said, quote, You don't have to put any money in there.
It's just really interesting once you start to listen to this stuff and you're like, these are what he's bringing to the table.
There are things that his weirdo callers, or they would be callers, I guess, his listeners are just faxing him these weird letters from the front line.
It's a mess.
But because he is Bill Cooper and he is a conspiracy-minded militia dude, it's all leading towards this conclusion.
The United States Attorney General is a murderess.
She murdered men, women, and little children in Waco, Texas.
And now today on television, she has a team effort to offer a $2 million reward for the instigators of the bombing of the federal building in Oklahoma City.
And she said she was worried about our women and children.
Call now.
Get your hands on some real money.
You're going to need it.
It might save your life one of these days.
1-800-289-2646.
Eight hundred.
Two-eight-nine.
Two-six-four-six.
Have you counted the bodies surrounding Clinton yet?
So we're going to skip to where he starts taking phone calls.
And he gets a call from a guy who wants to know what agencies were in the building.
unidentified
One thing I just wanted to put out there is that when we get a list of the number of judges and FBI agents, Secret Service agents, and other officers that were in that building, Perhaps how many have died and we'll get a better handle on exactly who might have been the perpetrators in this activity.
This is a guy who's made his name by saying you gotta prove everything, and he is making direct accusations of a gigantic conspiracy theory without any proof.
I've been away from my shortwave, and I've been having to watch this stuff and try to interpret between the lines, and your take on it sounds a hell of a lot more reasonable to me than anything I've heard in the last few days.
We have a report from people on the scene from a United States Navy super top secret installation that the day before, which was Tuesday, they held a bomb drill in one of their major installation buildings, and the drill involved an explosive in a car in the front of the building.
So, a large part of the focus of the stuff that I sort of experience when I'm listening to these shows is imagining what it would be like if you were someone who listens to it and believes it.
Which is why the things about, like, Bill's reporting on rumors for no reason.
Like, obviously, that is something that will have an effect on his listeners, whether or not it's his intended effect or not, or his stated intent.
And the reason is because you do hear things like this sometimes.
And it's really important to recognize that content like this does have an effect on people.
Like, if you're not careful with stuff like this, it will change some of your perceptions.
And maybe not in ways that are very popular.
unidentified
Well, I'll tell you what, I'm really watching close, and I'm really seeing the things I wouldn't have seen probably a couple years ago before I started.
Listening to your show and, you know, looking at the world in a different way.
He's created an overarching narrative that allows you to contextualize situations, draw connections between things.
That you wouldn't have otherwise because there isn't a connection?
When you have a guy like Bill who's preaching essentially this, I guarantee there will be more bombs after this bombing because it was a false flag, and then the Prince Edward Island bombing happens and he's like, aha, I was right.
When you are setting that kind of an example for your audience, you're going to end up...
having the effect that is not positive because it allows your listener to then do that.
I'm guessing if you're a student of history and military history, you could probably determine some sort of quantification for troop movement, military movement during Vietnam and World War II.
Now, I don't believe that on April 20th, Bill would have any reliable way to quantify the movement that was happening regarding Oklahoma City.
And for someone like him...
Who tries to present himself as just the fact, ma 'am.
Yes, so the discussion of Timothy McVeigh and the connections to militias and that kind of thing has come up, and it's clear.
And I'm going to be honest with you, the 21st is not nearly as interesting of an episode.
It's kind of uninspired in many ways.
And the only reason I included it in this is because there is a continuation of something from the 20th, and because these are part of a three-part series.
That Bill did about Oklahoma City.
They're packaged together on the Hour of the Times episode titling scheme.
The only way the national rumor mongers are going to be able to promote the militia involvement rumor is by simultaneously tying it to a racist group, and you heard that all day long.
White supremacists.
Religious fundamentalists.
Constitutionists.
Patriot groups.
The truth is, even in the backwoods-hit country of Oklahoma, investigators are not likely to find too many groups which are both racist and patriotic.
In my investigations, in this entire nation, there are probably 500 total white supremacists.
Now, Bill has said to his audience that the scripting of it will be that they're a racist, and then they'll make up some militia connections.
So, on the off chance that someone does get arrested who fits that mold, you know that it's just the fucking New World Order scripting this in order to make the Patriots look bad.
It's very identical to Alex's sort of methods and narratives surrounding people who do really terrible things, who happen to be a part of the self-selected group.
For Bill, it's very much heavily militia.
For Alex, it's white and Western, that sort of thing.
The report of two seismological events consistent with large explosions on the morning of April 19, 1995 is confirmed.
At 1.20 p.m. today, 4-21-95, I spoke with Dr. Luzza of the Oklahoma Geological Survey, which is located in the Sarky Energy Building at the University of Oklahoma campus.
Dr. Lusa showed me the seismograph recordings made on that morning, showing two separate seismological disturbances.
The first occurring at 9.02.04 a.m. and the second occurring at 9.02.14 a.m.
So this is interesting, because like I mentioned earlier, what he's talking about is a real thing.
But Bill's jumping to wild conclusions with it, and he doesn't end up earning this narrative at all.
The way he's presenting things, there were two events registered on the seismograph, and as such, this is proof that there were two explosions at the Murrah building.
This is a simple conclusion to reach if you have a habit of not considering other possibilities, which it seems like Bill might not do a lot.
The fact that there were two waves registered on the seismograph was of interest to researchers, so they studied the phenomenon further.
What they ended up figuring out is that this was the result of low and high frequency signals traveling at slightly different rates.
The low-frequency signal made it the 16 miles from the bomb site to the seismograph in Norman a few seconds prior to the high-frequency signal.
When the Murrah building was demolished on May 23rd, researchers set up additional seismographs and found a similar pattern with the two wave signals, despite there being only one controlled explosion.
Further study has demonstrated clearly that this wave signal pattern is not proof of two explosions, but Bill doesn't know that when he's on air jumping to conclusions about this.
He's breaking one of his own cardinal rules because it's important to him that this not be the work of someone who believes the same things as him.
So there are a few problems with this narrative that Bill's presenting here with this bill that was supposed to have been passed by the Oklahoma legislature, which would effectively give militia a patriot explanation for why the New World Order decided to attack Oklahoma, of all places.
The first thing that's important to understand is that H.R. 1047 that he's talking about is not a bill.
It's a House resolution.
Resolutions that are passed are not legally binding at all, and they're really just things that people introduce to express a sentiment.
It's like the recent thing we talked about where the San Antonio City Council passed a resolution denouncing the use of the term China virus.
This resolution was introduced on March 8, 1994, not May 17, and it was put forth by a state rep named John Monks.
It's a completely absurd proclamation about how the U.S. needs to, quote, cease any support for the establishment of a new world order or any form of global government.
It's definitely paranoid and just a very weird resolution.
But honestly, if I were Bill, H.R. 1056 works better.
That was a, quote, resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers, serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates and directing distribution.
That one's closer to Bill's introduction date, since that was introed May 12th, 1994, and it kind of...
Works better for his narratives.
I kind of suspect that Bill is just combining or confusing these two resolutions.
Or maybe he doesn't know what he's talking about.
I don't know.
There's no reason to blow up a federal building because of those non-binding, non-legally actionable sentiments of we don't like the New World Order.
I've studied these socialist pukes for years and I'm right on the target.
I'm the only one who has consistently and with absolute accuracy predicted every step that they're going to take.
Listen to this.
Anti-terrorism bill now on fast track.
On Tuesday, the Omnibus Counterterrorism Act of 1995 was a proposal on a low track in Congress and the object of a lively debate as to whether it would violate some fundamental civil liberties, including the right to confront one's accuser.
Now, after the Oklahoma City bombing, there are few sure legislative bets in Washington.
Democrats and Republicans Issue a blizzard of news releases Thursday calling for the bill's quick passage.
So around the time of the bombing, and this is the case with just about every high-profile thing, there will end up being copycat threats that are made.
This is a phenomenon that is unfortunate in humans, but whenever there is something like this, there will be people who make prank calls, there will be people who are trying to sow more chaos, and Bill thinks that that's the New World Order doing that.
Phoned in bomb threats forced temporary evacuations of federal office buildings in several cities, including Boston, Miami, Santa Ana, California, Birmingham, Alabama, Wilmington, Delaware, Portland, Oregon, Boise, Idaho, and Carswell Air Force Base in Fort Worth, Texas.
A bomb scare also forced the evacuation of Boston's City Hall.
Are you going to continue to say, oh, nothing's going on, the government wouldn't hurt us.
Are you going to continue until you're rounded up and sent to some socialist labor camp because you don't fit in with their concept of how your mind is supposed to work in the New World Order?
Is that what it's going to take before you wake up?
Look around you.
This is not the United States of America.
Not at all.
And that is not a constitutional Republican government in Washington, D.C., nor in most states of the several states.
And, like, there could be no worse time for you to fuck up like this than, like, in the immediate aftermath of a gigantic terrorist attack that traumatized the country.
It's really, really terrible.
And I think that through this prism, you do see a lot more of Alex in him.
In terms of these patterns, these trends, these behaviors.
I think the picture becomes a bit clear as to why I think that probably some of the other episodes we did about him didn't really necessarily make the connection strongly enough as to why he is an important figure within the context of our show.
And I hope that some of those things were better clarified here and better clarified that this dude sucks.
So as I realized that I said something at the beginning of this episode that I didn't really...
And that is that this almost completely got derailed.
And it's because I was preparing this episode and I got to last night and I was pretty deep into this to the point where it's like, well, it's going to be tough to make another episode for when we need to get together to record.