Claims: in ai regulation

8 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
09 Apr 2026
Self-regulation by tech companies like OpenAI and Anthropic won't stop AI development because the technology is already available.

But what I'm saying is that it doesn't matter if OpenAI and Anthropic and Google suddenly become ferociously. Self regulatory because the tech is out there. There's already LLMs that anyone can, like, we know how to make it. And if you don't know how to make it, it'll tell you how to make it. People are, so it doesn't matter. You can't stop it now.

11 Sep 2024
Big tech companies want to outlaw public access to AI because independent users are using it against them.

And they admit that the big companies don't know what to do with it because they want to make it all corporate and controlled, but it's really independent people using it and adopting it that are using it against the enemy. That's what they want to outlaw and have been pushing in Europe and here and around the world. The general public, even having access to AI. They want to use AI to control us, but they don't want us to use AI against them.

11 Sep 2024
OpenAI and other major tech companies lobby for AI regulation under the guise of public safety to create anti-competitive monopolies.

Yeah, well, ChatGPT is definitely the most sophisticated because they have the vast amount of funding, much more funding than a lot of the competitors or third parties that are competing against it. And that's why we see from OpenAI and other major big tech companies this effort to lobby for more regulation. They do it in the name of public safety, but what they're really trying to do is make sure that it's anti-competitive so that nobody else can come in and make something that's free speech oriented, right?