There doesn't have to be imaginary intelligence. They're willing to lie. Well, there's imaginary intelligence. Don't get it twisted. And then this person, the conversation steers into divine providence. We can't just say, okay, look at this one issue and say he's made a bad decision. Now, you know, should I vote for him? Should I not vote for him? We cannot waiver because there's so much T cannot tell us that Intel can't tell us. There's so much going on that if we did know everything that's going on, we would say, oh, I completely understand. We need to have trust and faith. God, I personally believe that God has chosen Trump to be the president of the United States, and he will lead us down these dark paths. But soon to come, there will be light. I personally believe that. Okay. Okay. Ooh, you should stop believing that. Yeah. I strongly disagree. When you're on a show that's complaining about a theocracy in Iran, don't say that your president was chosen by God. I don't understand why there's a problem there. There's a slight problem. Right. I would say that that is a purely unacceptable way of thinking. Yeah. You know, like, regardless of just that idea of like, well, you know, he made one bad decision, so we still have to support him. It's like, okay, he put green peppers on the pizza and you don't like green peppers. I get it. You still support the guy as president. He starts World War III. I think then we need to start talking about other options. I even understand, you know, I even understand that kind of mentality being acceptable in terms of like kind of border cases. Yeah. You know, like there's sometimes geopolitical decisions that have really negative consequences that may or may not be justifiable. Yeah. And in those cases, you can kind of take a position of, hey, that was really bad, but that doesn't make you. Right. But I don't think that applies. There's a difference of process versus results. True. You know, like that's why it's important to show your work. Right, exactly. And that's why it's important not to rely on vague ideas of imaginary intelligence. Exactly. But I do agree with the premise that the caller is saying, and that is that there's a ton of stuff we don't know. Sure. Now, it's left to be seen until we know whether or not the secret stuff is exculpatory or makes Trump look worse. Yeah. It's unclear. It's unclear. And this guy's instant assumption is that like, well, yeah, everything that we don't know justifies all this. And that's why we got to keep supporting the God King. No. I'm just boggled by that idea of anytime somebody has asked for evidence from Trump regarding any possible thing, it is always worse for him. Right. There is nothing, nobody's ever been like, oh, well, this evidence proves Trump is. It's either we're not going to share any evidence or the evidence we do share makes him look like a psychopath.