Claims: in muslim ban

3 claims
Narrow claims Pick any combination. Press Enter to apply typed text.
Clear filters
Speaker
Target
Topic
Certainty
Claim text
Date range
27 Feb 2017
A ban on Muslims sets a legal precedent that could eventually be used to ban Christians.

Hey, we're making this Muslim ban because we're afraid of Muslims. If you do that, even if it works, even if it's legally justified, that still means that somewhere down the line, someone can do a Christian ban. Sure. That's within the realm of possibility. Precedent set. Exactly. So if you're at all thinking about yourself, you should be against this bullshit because eventually that sword can be used towards you.

13 Feb 2017
The stay on the Muslim ban was issued because the executive order was written poorly and appeared to target religion, not because of disagreement with the policy itself.

Now, as far as the conversation over, and this is exactly what the Muslim ban thing happened there. The reason that they issued that stay on whether or not they could reinstate it immediately is not because they agree or disagree with what was going on. It is not because they say, you can't do this or that. It's because he did it wrong. It's because the executive order was written in such a way that it's impossible to take it any other way as a religious situation.