Get 50% off Webroot Total Protection or Webroot Essentials when you go to http://webroot.com/pool
Text TIM to 36912 to get 60% off the BAERSkin Hoodie today! Or click: https://baer.skin/tim
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/
Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwNTXWEjVd2qIHLcXxQWxA/joinShow more Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere)
Phil @PhilThatRemains (X)
Tate @realTateBrown (everywhere)
Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere)
Producer:
Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere)
Guest:
DeVory Darkins @devorydarkins (X)
Podcast available on all podcast platforms!
Anti-ICE Extremists LOOT DHS Vehicles, Steal Weapons, Trump Warns INSURRECTION | Timcast IRL Show less
Last night in Minneapolis, rioters took a DHS vehicle and they looted it.
They grabbed a bunch of DHS officers' information.
They exposed it online.
They even grabbed a rifle from the lockbox in the back.
So we're going to talk about that.
Donald Trump is talking about the Insurrection Act still, and it's starting to look like that might become a reality.
So we're going to talk about that.
Tim is doing a hit on Fox News shortly.
So we'll go ahead and grab that.
And what else do we got going on?
That's about it right now.
So we're going to go ahead and throw it over to Devoy Darkens as our guest tonight.
So why don't you go ahead and tell people about yourself?
Yeah.
Devor Darkins, political commentator.
I pride myself on common sense and a more even-kill analysis of what's going on in our country.
I love to show both sides and let people make up their own mind.
Awesome.
Always a pleasure to see you, man.
Like the last time you were on was awesome, too.
You have a powerful voice of reason right now, wisdom.
It's very important right now.
I'm at Ian Crossland.
You can find me all over the internet at Ian Crossland and measure my levels of wisdom yourself.
Also, while you're at it, check out graphene.movie.
The trailer's up.
It's looking hot.
The movie's coming soon.
It's a great nanotech doc.
If you wonder what's coming in the next 10 years, this will give you a head start.
Graphene.movie, sign up for the mailing list.
And remember, at Ian Crossland is where you get your lucky charms.
Let's go.
What's up, Patriots?
Tate Brown here holding it down.
So good to see Devori because usually I'm seeing the beginning of your stream because a lot of people in the audience, if you're watching the noon live, this is kind of weird.
This is kind of like a Marvel crossover.
If you're like a soy-out millennial, you love the Marvel crossovers.
You're getting really hype right now seeing this crossover.
So I'm usually throwing it to Devorah.
So, Devori, I want to apologize for sending so many like schizophrenic people into your chat.
That's like completely my fault.
So I'm handoff.
I'm very grateful.
Let's go.
You basically your audience raided Devori's audience.
Like, you know, raids like, oh, yeah, you send the link.
No, we raid.
Do you raid with purpose?
Yeah, like it literally looks like the Hobbit with the different clans that come together.
It's kind of like that.
Tate, I just noticed that, like, when you do the Tate Brown holding it down, my kid does the same thing, like, whenever I bump his crib, he does this thing.
He's a good kid.
He's a great kid.
All right.
So smash the like button, share the show with your friends.
We're going to jump right into it from the Dallas Express.
Video captures Minneapolis rioters looting DHS vehicles, exposing agent info online.
Agitators in Minneapolis continue to wreak havoc now, allegedly breaking into multiple ICE vehicles late Wednesday night, stealing guns, ammunition, and sensitive government documents, including arrest warrants and personal information on federal agents.
The crimes captured on video and in live streams circulating across social media spotlight the continued destruction from violent rioters against federal law enforcement agents, specifically through the Twin Cities.
Video clips posted by Nick Sortor from the scene show groups of agitators vandalizing unmarked cars allegedly belonging to immigration and customs enforcement officials, the Department of Homeland Security, and even possibly the FBI.
In one act, rioters attached a toe rope to a weapons locker, excuse me, in the trunk of the federal car and used a pickup truck to rip it open, stealing a rifle and ammunition.
There are a lot of leftists that have gone to private in their ex-accounts after this happened.
Tate, I'm interested in hearing what your take on this is.
Do you think that this is justification for the Insurrection Act?
Yeah, I mean, Viva Fry was on the show today on the Noon Live, and he made an interesting point, which was, you know, he is obviously also saying, like, yeah, this is the ground, this is grounds for the Insurrection Act.
There could be an argument that the left may be goading that sort of reaction out of the Trump administration so then they can say, oh, look how authoritarian it is.
This sort of justifies this.
Maybe this would swing over some weak Republicans into some sort of resolution to maybe try and strip away Insurrection Act powers from the GOP.
But the point he made and the point that I was making, and we're both in agreement, is like, yeah, but this is the grounds for it.
So I don't really care what the reaction is going to be.
Let's just do it.
Let's rip the bandit.
Because like the stuff we're seeing here, like where they're literally like roping around the case and yanking out of the truck and that sort of stuff.
We didn't even see that kind of stuff in 2020.
Like that is next level, literally raiding an ICE vehicle.
Like that's a very unique thing where they're stealing weapons.
Like it's GTA.
There was actually a dude that there was actually a dude in, I believe it was in Seattle that grabbed a rifle from a police car, police officer car and a security guy who actually like grabbed the rifle from him.
He actually made a YouTube page for himself and called him the weapon snatcher.
But I do think to your point, it doesn't really matter what the left says.
It's time for the government to, you know, for the federal government to move in and make sure that the ICE officials and the DHS officials can do their job.
Yeah.
One question I have for the administration is: how do you fight against a party who wants to get shot?
They want to get arrested.
They want to cause chaos.
And I think to your point, they're causing chaos because politically it will work for them.
It will motivate their base to show up and vote for them.
So even as a Republican party, how do you fight against that?
And with local government officials that are egging them on because Tim Waltz was talking today how, oh, you know, we need to turn the rhetoric down.
But just yesterday or over the weekend, he was saying, you know, we're at war with the federal government.
I think you really want to establish threat of force, like credible threat of force.
Trump sort of in his administration did that in Iran.
You know, they've moved the aircraft carriers and they're like, we're not going to attack.
Now they're like, we're going to send in, we're considering the insurrection act.
Tim Waltz is like, okay, okay, you're right.
They broke into federal property and stole federal weapons.
Tone it down people because that is legit insurrection act call.
So don't do that.
So that's promising.
Do you think Trump is serious?
I think he's like, yeah, Trump can literally do it and he has justification if you're taking federal weapons.
Well, and also the federal weapons.
The DOJ is apparently, according to reporting, sniffing around Tim Waltz right now.
So there's also a chance he received a tip, received a note got slid across his desk.
And he said, oh, oh, okay.
Yeah.
Okay.
Maybe guys stand down a little bit.
Because literally yesterday, to your point, he went out on national television and said something along the lines of I'm paraphrasing a bit, but he said this part directly.
He said, ICE agents are taking away your neighbors of color.
So he's basically like portraying these ICE agents as if they're some sort of Gestapo.
And that's a lie.
That's a lie for one.
And two, it's like, that's quite literally putting a target on these guys' back.
And then the next day, all of a sudden, he's like, come to his senses and he's like, guys, this has gone way too far.
It's like, is anybody buying this?
No, sounds like you got a call.
That's a good point.
Right.
And you said it earlier.
Where are the people of color in these protests?
Yeah, literally.
I'm not seeing them exactly.
Yeah.
But I want to say this too.
So the DC mayor is like Tim Walz as well.
Isn't it interesting?
She's not running again.
I wonder what happened because her police chief was caught cooking the numbers on the crime data.
So maybe there's some dirt on Tim Walz where he's compromised now.
I think that's likely.
And to be honest with you, I mean, this is something we talked about a little bit, but I think that it probably spans the whole Democrat Party.
I mean, you've got essentially the entire left side of the aisle, whether you're a far leftist or someone that would be considered, you know, fairly moderately left, if there are any of those in the Congress anymore, but they're all covering for illegal immigrants, right?
They're all essentially they're trying to, you know, trying to convince people that illegal immigrants equals people of color, which is not true at all.
There are plenty of illegal immigrants from white countries.
There are illegal immigrants from Europe, and it doesn't matter.
It's not about color at all.
But they're trying to make it out like that.
And when it comes to all the fraud and stuff that you hear, there's a lot of the Democrat politicians that are doing their best to either cover it up.
And I think it's because they're trying to cover up their own involvement or at least the fact that they haven't used the powers of government to stop it or prevent it.
And I think there are some that actually are participating in it.
Yeah, Tate made it because you asked him the question.
I think this administration should just go all in.
Just invoke it, get it over with, and just let's see what happens.
Because if they do nothing, then what happens?
I think they're just going to keep going and innocent people will be hurt in the process as a result.
If Tim Waltz hadn't said stand down, I would really lean towards that as well.
But because of it, I'd like to see what if people actually stand down because someone mentioned earlier, I think you may have mentioned, Devori, that they could be baiting them.
I mean, a big part of the revolution of the point.
The Marxist, yeah, communist thing is they want the federal government to crack down with a fascist dictatorship so that they can be like, see, we told you, community rally, commune, communism.
And it's like, come on, dude, just don't take the bait.
That's all stood down.
It had gone too far last night, but hopefully.
That's in the good trouble.
To use the reaction, the reaction of your opponent is the actual target.
That's what they're looking to do.
That's why they have guys out there dressed up like Pikachu, or that's why they have women with kids out there.
They have women out in the front of the line because what they want is they want to get a picture of you beating up of the police beating up a woman or beating up a dude that's dressed up like Pikachu or whatever, because then it makes the government look like they're overreacting and makes them look ridiculous.
Well, and the conservative right-wing argument against invoking the Insurrection Act as it stands right now is the Insurrection Act completely federalizes every sort of form of riot control in the state of Minnesota as soon as you invoke it.
The right-wing conservative argument is, look, if we can just simply bend these blue state governors' arms with just the three-letter agencies, that sets the tone much more than the Insurrection Act.
Because the Insurrection Act, obviously, that's going to sort of disarm them, incapacitate them.
But again, if you can manage to twist the arm of Tim Waltz, which we saw today with just using the three-letter agencies, there's something to be said about that actually might send even more of a message to these left-wing governors going forward.
That's the debate raging on Ryan.
Because, you know, it's really in vogue right now, obviously, to say, well, Insurrection Act, let's just mop this up.
But I don't think the, and I'm not saying anybody's making this argument, but I don't think the Trump administration are idiots.
I think Stephen Miller is actually keenly aware that, hey, if we can manage to just basically set up a trap right here without having to invoke the Insurrection Act, that's going to be much more politically expedient going forward than every single time there's a riot, every single time there's a protest, let's just chuck the Insurrection Act and get it over with.
Yeah.
And I mean, to your point, like it does also leave the Insurrection Act as a card you can play, right?
If you don't have to go full on federalizing everything and you can get the local governments to do what you want just by applying pressure, then you can save the Insurrection Act for if they don't respond or what have you.
It's interesting because then what you're saying in that argument is that conservatives have to trust that the DOJ is going to get some results.
And quite frankly, I don't think we believe that at this point.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, it's definitely like the DOJ.
There's a lot of question marks.
You're seeing reporting that Bondi is just not on the same page with the Trump admin broadly.
But yeah, I mean, that argument doesn't make sense because something like us conservatives is we want nothing more, including myself.
We want nothing more than to see Marines on the streets because I think as a collective, we are a bit, you know, this is like a gay word to use, but we're a bit traumatized from 2020.
Like that was actually such an egregious, embarrassing moment as a country that we just are paranoid of seeing that ever happen again, me included.
So we just want to see the Marines go in just to send a message, just to get a bit of sort of vindication in a lot of ways.
But then that's where the debate is.
Okay, what's more politically expedient for the next three years?
I think that that's one of the reasons or one of the best arguments for Donald Trump actually using the Insurrection Act is to make sure that 2020 is not repeated.
But there's a lot of people that are like, I don't want to see that again.
I don't want to see cities being burnt.
I don't want to see people out rioting like this, et cetera, et cetera.
There's a lot of people that look at Donald Trump and think, well, he's not actually as strong as he talks.
And it would take that kind of, you know, that kind of order from the administration to get people to be like, oh, well, I guess maybe he does have a new.
Because even I think, you know, I'm like, I'm not sure Donald Trump has it in him to do the stuff that's necessary to really put this stuff down.
And I hope he does, if it's necessary, but I'm not 100% sure.
It seems like with things in Iran, like heat being hot like they are in Venezuela, Trump doesn't have room to mess around domestically.
So if there's a threat of one of our cities going under right now, now is not the time to mess with the federal security force because we need diplomatic unity at home in order to preserve against international forces.
A lot of countries will bullshit you and use that reasoning and be like, we must come together to fight the, but this is legit potential explosive threats that we can't tender a domestic pop.
So, and Waltz knows that.
Well, yeah, you're describing like a very real political mechanism, which is every president, every politician has a limited amount of political capital that they can spend.
And that's what you need to look at at you need to look at Trump's victories bank you political power that you can then spend in other places, potentially like we did in the last time, potentially on issues that are unpopular.
And there are some issues that like, you know, Trump loyalists want to push across the finish line that are unpopular with the majority of Americans.
So that's where you spend that political capital.
So the question is, if we're really expending political capital on Iran, you still need some leftover to then quash these sorts of things in Minneapolis and these sorts of things.
And so, yeah, altogether, I mean.
I think that the actions.
Actually, Tim's on.
That's my boss.
I think that's a good question.
We're going to jump to Tim Poole.
I think we got to talk over him.
That's my job.
I get him, Tim.
It seems so.
Now, I don't want to say at the highest levels, Democrat politicians want to foment civil war, as I often talk about, but they're beholden to their constituents.
So we have a mayor suggesting the police should now be fighting federal agents, which is horrifying.
But it's actually quite simple.
ICE agents are out on the ground across the country because I asked them to be, because you asked them to be, because the American voter said immigration is a top issue for us.
We want Republicans in office.
We want Donald Trump in office.
And we want this problem solved once and for all.
So what are we seeing?
Violent extremists who oppose our democracy and the will of the people.
That video you showed where they put the toe rope and rip out the weapons locker.
That's not the only one.
There were other vehicles they ransacked.
There's a video purported to show a man stealing what appears to be a rifle from a federal vehicle and ammunition, as well as patches, tourniquets, and other objects.
This is not a protest.
This is not a riot.
These are political extremists, and it's overt terror.
I'll tell you what it upgrades to terror when these people are reading the names of the agents on camera, which they did after they ransacked the vehicle, after they leaked their names, and apparently went and found their private vehicles.
So we're at a whole new level.
And Jesse, I used to go on the ground all the time.
I've covered tons of these protests.
I've been personally attacked and assaulted by many of these extremists.
I have never seen this level of extremism.
I mean, we've seen firebombs, we've seen broken windows, but to ransack federal vehicles and steal their weapons.
So let me say this about what happened to Renee Goode.
You may have seen the video immediately following the moment where she dies.
And it's tragic.
I wish she didn't.
I wish it didn't happen.
But you hear her lover say, why were you using real bullets?
There's two different people here.
There's two different groups.
You've got your political extremists, and they radicalize your liberal ICE mom, your run-of-the-mill suburban mom who doesn't really understand what they're being asked to do.
And these women, they've gone out to your protest where they wiggled their little flags and their signs and they said, this policy is bad and that policy is bad.
This is something different.
The extremists are advocating that these middle-aged women show up to federal law enforcement operations where armed federal agents are seeking out criminal cartels, murderers, rapists, child traffickers.
And they're wondering why these ICE agents are apprehensive and armed with lethal munitions.
They're not prepared for this, and I fear it will get worse.
No, I mean, they're crash test dummies, and I'm not calling them dummies.
I'm just saying they're being used like crash test dummies.
They're naive.
They're untrained.
They're just not cut out for this.
You've been on the streets, and you can see the difference.
You look at Minneapolis, and then you look at a city like Memphis.
So Memphis, run by a Democrat mayor in a red state, but they agreed to cooperate.
They have backup by the locals.
It's not a sanctuary.
And they're picking up bad ombres left and right.
There's no rebellion.
It's done professionally.
And no one's gotten hurt.
And they go after the worst first.
Why can't that be the model?
Why does it have to come to this type of violence?
You know, just to, I don't want to call it a non-sequitur, but the Greenland thing, I think, really exemplifies the no matter what Trump does, he is wrong.
And that's really what it is.
The Democratic politicians are going to say ICE is wrong to enforce the law.
They're wrong to stop these narco-gangs, these rapists, these criminals, and general illegal immigrants.
And when you see how Trump is simply negotiating for Greenland and they tell him he's wrong on that one too, I throw my hands up.
We voted for immigration operations, and your point is astute.
In areas where there's agreements and they cooperate, it's clean, safe, and the job is done.
But in these particular areas, what do we get?
A judge aiding and abetting a man who beat his wife to helping him escape and getting convicted for it.
We can't function this way.
No, I mean, the country cannot function if you have little carve-outs of chaos in major cities and states where agents can't go in and enforce federal law.
I mean, that's when the country collapses, and hopefully it doesn't come to that.
I disagree.
Tim Poole, great to see you as always.
Insightful analysis.
Thank you, Jesse.
And that is something I'd like to talk to Jesse about particularly.
I think little bouts of chaos are part of what make America great.
Being able to overthrow tyranny, having local government disagreeing with the overlord.
So it's a debate to be had, but stealing federal weapons is insurrection.
if you're looking to actually have a policy that was voted on by the American people that was that is very popular.
I mean, when Trump was elected, it was something like 75% of Americans said, yeah, we want to get rid of illegal legal things.
Now, granted, as the policy is implemented and it gets kinetic, then people get a little, you know, they get a little weak in the knees and stuff like that.
And I understand that's going to happen.
But when it comes to the actual idea of getting people that are here legally out, that's incredibly popular.
And I don't think that, and considering the fact that it can be done peacefully, like Jesse was saying, you know, Memphis, it's, you know, there's, you're not getting people riding.
You're not getting all of this stuff because you don't have politicians egging them on.
I do blame the Democrats in office for the vast majority of this of this, the violence and chaos that we see.
And it's not necessary.
It could be a policy that just, you know, that is done smoothly and cleanly.
Oh, were you going to?
No, I was just going to say, I don't think they want to solve the problem.
I think that's clear.
Secondly, San Francisco, D.C., Memphis, New Orleans, no drama.
They all collaborate it, which shows that it works.
Three, to what Tim Poole was saying, which is essentially these people are, they're off the reservation.
They're far gone.
So these are people that have to be dealt with differently than what we normally would do.
And here's the other thing.
Where is the police department?
Well, they're standing down intentionally.
They don't want to get involved because, again, I think that the Democrat politicians want the chaos.
I think that they think that, or at least that for a time, they were thinking, this is good for me.
To see people get injured and stuff, it's good for the Democrats.
They want to see the chaos.
You say it's like it can be peaceful, like in Nashville, for instance, but for them, it's like taking your enemy's food supply is like, they call it non-violent.
The CIA describes it as non-violent because there's no kinetic action.
But we all know that taking a community's food supply would be considered violent in the scheme of things.
So removing people that live there that might be there illegally, but have become part of the community emotionally, they see it as like removing the food supply.
So they, it's not really vi, you know, it's kind of how you that's right, Ian.
And I've been sitting here the whole time.
Are you the guy from Fox News?
I am.
Don't get wishy-washy on us when we were trying to enforce the law, Ian.
We were talking, Jesse at the end there said that chaos is not tolerable.
I thought that, you know, bouts of chaos is kind of what makes America great, being able to resist the overlord, the Fed, whatever.
Not that this is necessarily the debate on whether this is right or wrong is almost like tertiary to the debate, just the understanding that it's local government supersedes.
When chaos is dominant, we're screwed.
A little bit of chaos is a good thing because you want to be able to evolve, adapt, expand, grow, et cetera.
If you're too rigid, you shatter.
You got to have a little flexibility, otherwise you snap.
You know what I'm saying?
I've always made this point, like in regards with European cities.
Okay, as right-wingers, as conservatives, like we inherently believe in hierarchy, we inherently believe in order.
We believe these things are ordained by God.
But when like in Europe, for example, where there's zero sense of like an underworld whatsoever, these cities actually just turn into museums and it like completely eviscerates any sort of life that's in these cities.
So I actually steel man Ian's argument here because if you look at like Prague or Budapest, like these cities for young people are actually quite miserable.
These are very old cities.
So I do agree that to a degree, you obviously can't endorse it as the government.
You can't promote it.
But just a bit of room for things actually goes a long way for young people because that's what creates innovation, that creates culture and these sorts of things.
It just can't come at the sacrifice of order, which is exactly what's taking place.
And the other thing, too, is we're dealing with people who don't even support the idea that someone who's been in the country unlawfully for 30 years should not be deported.
Right.
It's like they're emphasizing disorder in the most pernicious ways, whether it's in sexuality, whether it's in civilizational questions like immigration, what does it mean to be an American?
That's where they promote the dysfunction.
It's not even just disorder.
It's dysfunction.
It's dysgenic.
It's really perfect.
How about just going back to the whole people of color thing?
Just if you think of economics and our financial freedom, as people like to say, how could that even be a reality if they keep funding illegal immigration?
I don't understand that.
So these people, they're going into the streets, they're protesting, saying that things are too expensive, you know, all this other stuff.
Well, what do you think's happened with all of your resources?
Yeah.
They've been going to illegal immigration.
Well, they can't put two and two together.
And then when we say this, like, hey, maybe you can't afford houses because the market is oversaturated with people who are needing houses.
And in order, see, they don't understand supply and demand because they're communists.
So it's like, money, let me just, if there's any communists out there who are concerned about why there are homeless people, let's start with when there's too many people and not enough homes, the people who own the homes get to dictate the prices.
And they say, listen, I got people banging my door down saying they'll take my house.
I'm going to take the best offer.
When you have no people and there's a bunch of empty houses, they're going to sell them for what they can sell them for.
So when you keep inviting in more and more and more people, your prices, they're going to go up.
Not to mention the very simple reality of at a certain point, people walking on the ground break the ground and then we have to fix it.
This is what I'm talking about.
I'd love to make that point.
Supply and demand functions, but that's not a closed system.
Outside the people that can't participate in that supply and demand system, which is like house buying, they're so poor, they become highway robbers.
They do things to that system of the supply and demand system.
So people that are here completely unable to think about housing, they will put pressure on that supply-demand trade system with whatever, you know, riots in the streets, but like it could be lots of different ways.
The point was additionally just roads don't last forever, buildings don't last forever, maintenance is a requirement for all of our infrastructure.
And if you're inviting in more and more people to tunes of tens of millions, eventually a bridge collapses.
And we have to fix it.
So over time, a bridge is going to face just general environmental wear and tear and degradation.
And you got to fix it.
But you add millions of people walking back and forth across it.
It breaks down faster.
That's going to cost everybody money.
And that's going to come from the public coffers.
But these communists, you know, the best example of how insane these socialists and communists are is that meme where it was like, someone said, what are you going to do when communism wins?
And they said, I'm going to teach art and poetry on my farm.
To which someone responded, your farm?
But while that is a funny joke, it also exemplifies what they think will happen.
They think that communism will come in and then they don't have to work ever again.
That's really what they think.
Yeah.
Yeah, that's not ever going to be the case.
Yeah, these Finnish are going to sit around doing like acrylic art all day.
It's like, bro, get to the mines, get your pickaxe, head on down to the mines.
Break rocks.
Yeah, yeah.
They'll call themselves Marxist-Leninists, but then they'll go ahead and forget that Lenin said, if you don't work, you don't eat.
Yeah, literally.
Yeah, literally.
If you hooked your body up to tubes in a vat and you let them harvest your heat, then you could be techno-communist, but they need something from you.
They're going to extract some sort of something out of you.
Modern communists love to say things like fully automated luxury communism because they believe that like with super productivity that's going to come with AI and with robotics, that everybody will have everything they want.
Look, if that is the future, like where you can actually be super productive and there's nobody, you know, anything you want, you can have, which I don't think is actually going to happen.
But if that were the case, fine.
Then maybe you can make the argument.
And I'll say that.
I think we need a new word to describe this because communist, it's like you can say neo-communist because it is a different function.
It's different to the general ideology we knew in the early 1900s.
Largely because you're looking at an industrializing society and they're approaching this concept of labor from a, we can do a lot more work, but we still work.
Now you're looking at the AI revolution and there's going to be people who cannot work.
Of course, many of these people are not advocating for UBI, which that won't work either.
Even David Sachs said this and he's the AI czar.
He's like, no, UBI is not going to happen.
So I'll just say this.
You know, every day I track what's going on with AI developments.
And it is, the development is so massively exponential.
This show probably won't exist, won't be able to exist.
One thing that we're seeing right now, and you're wondering why, let me tell you why first, already, already, right now, if I wanted to, I could take probably 50 episodes of Timcast IRL, load it into an AI, and tell it, isolate Tim Pool and clone him.
I'm literally, right now you can do this.
It'll probably take you half a day to upload all the videos and then it'll take maybe a day to render the clone.
It takes about an hour or two.
And then you can tell ChatGPT, write a script in the style of Tim Pool about today's news, and it'll do it.
And you don't need me anymore.
It'll just, it'll do it.
The only real problem is that all the AI is woke.
So they're going to tell fake news, but they'll just do it in my voice.
It'll be creepy.
Here's what's happening right now on YouTube.
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of channels.
This is crazy.
I'm going to tell you guys how to become millionaires right now.
Get your bag before it's too late.
No joke, no joke.
What they'll do is they'll write a script that automatically will plug into ChatGPT and say, write a 30-minute long script based on today's news.
Start with the punchiest sensational story.
Then it'll load that script into an AI avatar video generator and it will tell the AI, have a person, an attractive male or female, read this script over the period of a half an hour.
And what they do is they upload 70 to 100 of these videos per day.
Seriously, psychotic amounts of videos.
And they get 500 to 800 views.
And you might be saying, well, what's that going to get you?
Well, when you do 100 of them, you're making 150K per month.
And here's the thing: people won't come back to watch those videos, but it won't matter because the videos change.
The style changes.
And it's going to eventually get recommended to somebody.
And they're going to click it.
And if a couple hundred click your couple hundred videos per day, you are making banks.
I'm for sure.
I've been recommended that stuff.
I'm pretty sure.
Like AI history documentaries.
It's pretty obvious it's AI or that it's.
There's news.
I got recommended this video on news and I saw it was like 45 minutes long and I'm like, who's this?
And it's a fake person.
And it's getting crazier and crazier.
Here's the other thing.
What if I just recorded this video, uploaded it, and then had it choose a sexy woman instead of me?
And then you get all the thirst clicks.
Because I'm just going to be.
I want to stress to you guys.
We A-B tested yesterday's thumbnail with Aaron Wexler and the boobs did 3% better.
3%?
Is it still testing?
Yeah, actually, I can check right now and see where it's at.
It was at 51, 48.
3% is actually massive.
Oh, it looks like did the boobs lose?
Boobs were a lot.
Come to their senses of it just decided not to.
Everybody sucked on a boob at some point if they were 3.2%.
Yeah, that's not the normal way boobs would be marketed.
I mean, virtually, they would be white.
Or with Iran.
My point is like, we're making a big mistake with Tate.
We're making a big mistake.
We got a great opportunity with him.
He should pre-record the whole shot and then Tate has to get it.
Oh, you're going to see her to transmit.
Yeah.
Using AI, I can take the noon live show and then we're uploading it at 4 p.m. onto YouTube.
Like, hey, watch this, Black Lex and make up the Goon live show.
What we do is you upload the video to an AI, and then you can take any photograph.
So the way these programs work is you upload the video, then you upload a photo, and it will use the photo as a reference for the room and the person.
So we can swap Tate out with some busty young woman talking about the news and get way more money.
Can you A-B-test the video itself or is it just the thumbnail?
Just a thumbnail on the title.
Okay.
Yeah.
I think it would work.
And yeah, and I just think we're cooked.
You could A-B-test the thumbnail with an AI chick instead of Tate, and it might get a lot more clicks.
It absolutely will get clicks.
I'm just, that's just a reality.
And like, oh, welcome to the future.
You know, wait till the other guy does it.
Or the hottest, flashiest.
They're already doing it.
They're already doing it.
There are already guys that have gaming content and viral videos on Instagram where you'll see a woman with like a low-cut top, and it's actually a guy records a video and then renders it as a woman to upload it.
We were just watching.
That's the future, bro.
What we should do is tomorrow for the noon show, the goon show, rather, A-B test hot chick in the thumbnail.
Yeah, you can't do that.
And Tate, you can't?
Why not?
If you put up a thumbnail that is not representative of the video, it'll get removed.
What if we're talking about now?
We're prepping people.
I see.
I'm not going to push it.
I'm just wondering.
You'll get a strike.
It'll get taken off.
Oh, okay.
You are not allowed to make thumbnails out there.
Dude, they do like weird, like provocative audio.
It's one thing to make a thumbnail where Tate's looking at a hot woman shocked and she's not in the video.
That could get you in trouble still.
What if it's Tate with breasts, like covered, but cleavage?
With a white hottest, yeah.
Like a dude face with boots.
Yeah, it'll work.
Hottest is hottest.
Or you play, what, 10 seconds of a skit AI as soon as the video starts to make sure the thumbnail matches what's in the video?
Well, we are filming across the pond tomorrow.
Maybe because accents are kind of sexy, right?
So maybe if we somehow trans Connor for the show, then that can really boot bolster the show.
You know, they have those filters.
Can we put a filter on Connor so that he's just like a scantily clad young British woman?
I think, and he'd probably, you know, knowing him, he'd probably be down for that.
He's a very open-minded guy.
He's like, I always wanted to be a young woman, so it works.
That's a really good imitation.
Is it?
I don't know.
I was just doing a general breakout.
It was like an AI imitation.
It was kind of great.
I just imagine that you do the underbutton.
It talks like this.
Well, I'm from London, so I'm smarter than you.
Yeah.
That's how I am.
Tune into across the pond.
It's basically the shit.
Let's jump to this.
We got big news.
The guy who stole the FBI weapons from the safe inside the federal vehicle has been arrested.
We've got this.
Can you?
We got this.
Oh, look at that.
It looks like his arrest details.
Let's change it to.
Oh, my God.
Oh, my.
Yeah, guy with the most tattoo in history.
Let me commit a federal crime.
We got him, boys.
You know what's else?
What's written there is how they booked him in.
Was he white, non-Latino?
Yeah, Hispanic.
That's so true.
Yeah, well, this guy, dude, I'm sorry.
If you have like a face tattoo like that, you got to give crime arrest.
You know, like, if you're clean, you know, clean-cut kind of guy, I could understand maybe participating in crime.
I just imagine like a Mike Tyson tattoo.
Like, what have we done?
They found that guy so fast.
Yeah.
So my take on this, and probably the conversation in the Night is the Insurrection Act.
My earlier take, Tim, I'm not sure if you were here or if you heard, but it's Tim Waltz basically came out.
I was like, you're right.
It's too far.
Trump has a legitimate claim on issuing an insurrection act with people thieving and stealing federal weaponry.
So he is like, cooling.
He said because they're stealing federal weapons.
I'm not sure what, but Waltz came out around 11 a.m., I heard, and was like, tone it down, everybody.
Yeah, he didn't say anything near that specific thing.
No, he said, you need to stop because it's gone too far.
So tone it down, Trump.
It's your fault.
Screw it.
No, I'm kidding.
But he just said, tone it down.
It's gone too far.
Trump, pull it back.
And I'm like, bro, did you see Mayor Fry Frey, whatever his name is, be like, we've got people saying the cops need to now fight ICE?
Yeah.
Trump needs to know.
No.
I voted for this.
Trump's got to tone it up.
Get out there and take care of these extremists.
Imagine Tim Waltz.
He's like, now that we have all these people trying to murder people and stealing federal weapons.
Trump, stop.
And I'm like, no, you stop?
What?
Federal law enforcement doing their jobs and arresting criminals?
And you're saying, we don't want criminals and cops fighting, so everyone should just go about their business.
It's kind of those things like in 2020, you know, everyone was like, well, if that cashier would have just taken the fake $20 bill, then none of this would have ever happened.
It's kind of the same thing.
It's like, if they would have just spelled learning correctly, none of this would have happened.
Bro, see, this one.
This is why I'm saying, like, we need to get a camera crew so we can do these bits.
Because then it's like, Tate goes back in time.
And then he walks in before George Floyd and he goes, I think that guy's got a counterfeit bill.
And then he just walks out.
We need to do.
He whispers in.
He comes out of the shadows and whispers in the other clerk, don't take the bill.
Don't be a hero.
We need to.
Don't take the bill.
He made the George Floyd thing.
Four to six cameramen and about 12 editors.
If you guys want to join us in Florida, come join us because we are creating the most bomb ass fucking entertainment industry right now.
I'm serious.
If you're interested, hit me up on Twitter.
Send me videos.
Send me something you've made.
We are legit making a powerhouse entertainment industry.
So let's rock and roll.
Stuff like that is genius.
So true.
Yeah, kind of going back to what you were saying about Take going back in time too just to get George Floyd.
I gotta write it down.
But I don't think you saw it.
The framing right now is very clear.
It's, hey, guys, we're going a little too far, but we're going too far because it's Trump's fault.
It's what he wants us to do.
What I really mean to say is, I want you to go this far.
Because like you were saying, it might be an actual bait.
Yeah, literally.
Like, this is what everyone, like, the initial thing that started the, let's just say the Renee Good, if she just ran over that officer, they would be celebrating.
These are the same people that celebrated Charlie Kirk's death.
So it's like, they would be celebrating this.
The only way you get these people to stop, the only way you like end this, again, is just sending a message to Minneapolis.
Like it's very simple.
There's no negotiating with these people.
There's no debating.
There's no like, maybe if we sweeten the deal or maybe make him a different offer.
Tim Waltz is just trying to get Trump to back down with ICE because he is not going to be his victory condition is ICE completely withdrawing from the city in an entirety.
We can't do that.
There's been a mandate given to the Trump administration.
Again, with Nick Shirley's video, now it's on everyone's desks.
They woke up and everyone saw the video, left, right, center, whatever.
The Trump administration is not going to back down.
Tim Waltz is evidently not going to back down.
He's also got all the cards, right?
Like the feds are really in the position of where they've got all the cards.
There's nothing that Tim Waltz or anyone in Minnesota can do.
That's part of the reason that Tim Waltz actually dropped out of the race is to at least give him sort of, he doesn't have to worry about re-election now.
He can literally do whatever he wants because he has this.
You have to remember, Tim Waltz got beat by Trump in an election.
He lost out on the vice presidency.
This dude has a chip on his shoulder like no other.
That's part of the reason he dropped out is because he wants to try and settle this score with the Trump administration.
He knows if he doesn't have to worry about re-election, he can pull whatever he wants.
I don't know.
I kind of feel like you have to have a decent amount of testosterone to have a chip on your shoulder.
No, people with low tests are like extreme, they have low impulse control and they're extremely emotional.
So it's actually the opposite.
He's like PMSing right now.
I just want to be clear about something.
Are you saying that if an illegal alien killed Renee Goode, there wouldn't be any riots?
There'd be no riots at all.
Yeah, it wouldn't even make news.
Actually, I'm sorry.
No, there would be riots to get the illegal immigrant out of jail.
Yeah, literally.
There we go.
They'd be like, why are you abusing this poor man of color?
They'd be like, Renee Goode was a right-wing extremist.
Yeah.
They would.
They'd say it was a privileged white woman who was trying to hit a poor and defenseless brown person.
There's already videos of like a middle-aged liberal woman being like, I don't know how I should feel about this because she was white.
You see that video?
Oh, yeah.
She pulled over because she wanted to see what was going on.
Okay, so you're just going to wing it.
Right.
Yeah, I love how it was like, he suffered internal bleeding, and then they go, you mean bruising?
And I'm like, so you agree he got hit?
Yeah.
Yeah.
It's just so stupid.
Yeah, these people are, it's a derangement.
Yeah.
It's part of the reason what makes it so frustrating that we lost to them for so long because they're just so incompetent.
It really demonstrates how incompetent they are.
Zombies are slow, stupid, but they have sheer numbers.
But they only had half the country.
We have the other half.
And then like half the country is too much.
But listen, listen.
Our leadership is so atrocious.
Let me explain.
Let me explain.
It's false to Obama.
Have you ever seen a zombie movie where the protagonists are going around biting the zombies?
No.
Of course not.
In all of these movies, the protagonists are like, we need to run and hide from them.
They're stupid and easily outsmarted or outwitted.
And yet the point is that in the mind, I'm not suggesting life is a zombie movie.
I'm saying the way we perceive threats of quantity is we run and hide.
That's the relatable experience.
So you have these liberals who are completely ignorant to what's going on, marching behind psychopath extremists, and we all run and hide.
Samson Rocky, until about 2020, then COVID was like too much, and we made this show a nice way to not run and hide anymore.
No, because there was the, it's more than just 2020, though, because he's talking about like this is a 60-year term.
Yeah, I mean, and a lot of it, I think, is because people want to, there's too many people that want to vote for the nice thing, right?
They want to vote for the thing that sounds nice, that sounds like, oh, we're going to be the nice country, and et cetera.
And I don't think that that actually means you're going to get put good policy.
Tim, we should just, we should give these zombies pocketbook constitutions.
I think what it is is they're not, they're not, they're not, they haven't been, you know, properly matriculated into the glory of free market economics and like classical liberalism.
That's what they need, is they should be steeped in the literature and then they'll just change it.
They're mandatory Neuralink.
I like that.
Ironically, that would work.
If you are a leftist rioter and you get arrested by ICE, they just jam the Neurlink into the back of your head by force.
And then all of a sudden the leftist stands up and goes, suddenly it just pops up.
I don't understand it all.
Rothbard is in my mind.
They just play Rocky V in their brain or Rocky 4 in their brain for like hours and hours until they're like just downloaded.
That's right.
Like they're screaming and smashing things and the cop's like, do it quick.
And he hits the John Locke button and the antifa guy goes, I understand everything now.
I'm going to stop attacking people.
Oh, supply and demand?
What?
I don't want to stress the invisible hand.
It's got me.
Literally.
I just think it's fascinating that we have more empathy for her being killed than they would have empathy if the ICE agent was actually run over.
Well, I do think it's fair to say that The way that the left has approached the Charlie Kirk thing is that the higher profile individuals at the highest level, the Democrats, said it's sad.
Our prayers are with the family.
Then the mid-tier people said, Yeah, well, he was a bad guy, and this is what happens.
And then the lower-tier, you know, leftist extremists all dance and celebrate it.
We do see something comparable with the killing of Renee Good.
I see it all over Instagram, sort of no-name accounts making memes, mocking her, dying, laughing about it, insulting her.
Then you get the mid-tier personalities like us saying, well, she accelerated towards an officer.
I mean, it's sad that she died.
And at the highest level, you have politicians saying, we're very sad this happened.
Trump even saying, I understand there's two ways you can see it.
Now, the difference is not factual, factually correct or factually incorrect.
The difference is moral worldview.
So for us, we're like, she was engaged in felony obstruction.
And this is a law enforcement operation, not crowd control work.
This is where the conflict arises.
Charlie Kirk was speaking.
That's it.
So you can't compare the two.
Well, in their worldview, their moral structure is you're allowed to obstruct law enforcement because it's for the greater good of what we determine.
And Charlie Kirk was spreading hate.
Now, we, of course, look at that and go, that's insane.
We can't agree with that, but it's the light and it's the dark, right?
They live in their moral worldview, which we think is psychotic, and we live in ours.
Isn't it interesting how silent they are about Keith Porter Jr.?
Did you guys hear about that?
No.
Well, we're silent about it too, I guess.
New Year's Eve, he's a black guy, lives in an apartment complex with an ICE agent.
He goes outside to celebrate, shoots his rifle in the air.
Bullets in the air.
The ICE agent comes out, confronts him, says, hey, I'm an ICE agent.
Stop doing that.
I guess he didn't comply.
And then, according to LAPD, and I say that carefully, according to LAPD, not my opinion, they say that he shot at the ICE agent three times and then the ICE agent shot him and killed him in self-defense.
And so which guy was it?
Which guy, what?
You named a guy, but there's two people who got it.
So the black guy, his name was Keith Porter Jr.
And he died.
And he died.
And they don't care?
That's why it just doesn't make any sense.
You would think they would have said something about that story.
It's interesting.
Nobody has heard of it, right?
Yeah, last year, I think the estimate is either four to six people were killed by ICE agents.
I think there was like 14 or 15 ICE involved shootings where someone was hit.
So it's like, now is the moment where they're seizing on it.
You wonder how clean those shots were because this is like clearly self-defense.
Like how egregious were those?
That would be just mortifying for the left.
Hey, Ben Crump is on the scene with the Keith Porter.
Oh, yeah, that's what I'm saying is they're silent about that.
Go ahead.
I want to pull up this clip.
This is the mayor saying that residents want cops to fight ICE agents.
Now, I do want to stress, I believe this is an edited and fake video, but the quote is real.
What I can tell you for certain is that this is not sustainable.
This is an impossible situation that our city is presently being put in.
And at the same time, we are trying to find a way forward to keep people safe, to protect our neighbors, to maintain order.
And we're in a position right now where we have residents that are asking the very limited number of police officers that we have to fight ICE agents on the street, to stand by their neighbors.
We cannot be at a place right now in America where we have two governmental entities that are literally fighting one another.
No, maybe I'm wrong.
I thought it was edited.
I think that's actually the correct video.
Sorry.
Edited that at the end.
Where the cops like, whoa.
Yeah, the mayor is coming out and saying residents want the cops to fight the feds.
So civil war?
Civil war anyway?
No.
We're able to talk about it and expose it.
I think it's not going to bubble up like it has in the past, like slowly bleeding Kansas, 12 years of it without any kind of like really federal crackdown or intervention.
This is like, we see the problem pretty quick now.
Ian, you're a frog in a pot.
Yeah, but I see the pot.
I have technology, like ladders, and like I'm way more aware of this.
If three years ago on this show, if three years ago on this show, I would have explained to you that we were facing the real risk of local law enforcement trying to fight the federal government and saying their cops should.
And then you'd have one of these leftists shot and killed by a federal agent.
You'd have said it's not possible.
Oh, I don't know if I would have said that.
Yeah, you know.
I'm pretty open-minded.
You would have said exactly the same thing you're saying right now, that the escalation is likely not going to happen.
Oh, if you say like 900 people are going to get killed by ice next year, I'm not going to say it's impossible.
You want to know how I know that.
500 people or 1,000 people.
I'm going to put a frog in a pot.
I'm calling you frog in a pot because you've said this to us 12 times over the past four or five years.
What exactly?
When we discuss like there's no off-ramp, the escalation is coming.
Your position is always no, this time I think otherwise.
It's a new situation.
It's not, you know, it's not written in stone.
It's always a new situation.
It's a lot about people are determining how they feel about these things in real time.
And so being able to report on it, like as it's happening, is really influencing what is going to happen tomorrow.
But could you just imagine, I love the time travel test.
Going back 10 years and saying 10 years from now, Donald Trump will be in a second non-consecutive term where he will be deploying thousands of federal agents and the National Guard to various cities to arrest an estimated 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants.
In the process, he'll discover child slaves are being on drug farms.
People will get shot.
Agents will get shot at, rammed, dragged, assassinated.
There will be terror attacks with rifles shooting at ICE facilities.
Then in one incident, a middle-aged woman will obstruct federal law enforcement and in her attempt to escape, strike an officer who shoots and kills her.
Like, guys, we already know because we've done the time travel experiment 75 times or more on this show going back several years.
And every time we bring it up, the next step seems equally more absurd.
So I always preface it by saying maybe this will be the time where people say, whoa, we've gone way too far.
It's time to tone everything down, boys.
We can't have this.
But again, 10 years ago, what I just laid out, you'd get locked up in a loony bin, and that's not even the half of it.
Throw in J6, throw in the Summer of Love riots, throw in Bunker Boy, the insurrection in front of the White House, the torching of St. John's church.
Throw in global lightnings.
People are going to be like, you're a lunatic and you need medication.
So again, if we went back two or three years, because I can, and I said, guys, it's going to get worse.
Let me put it like this.
A year and three months ago, what did I say on this show?
Oh.
2024 election.
2024 election.
Good show.
Sitting in the Daily Wire studios.
I said, Trump, after he wins, I said, if he wins, and then after he won, he is going to send out immigration enforcement and the Democrats, and I said, it's got to be done properly because the Democrats are going to take every photo and every video and claim it's the Nazis all over again and they're rounding up innocent people and they're killing innocent people and they're going to claim it's just like the Holocaust and what are we watching happen right now?
Literally that.
They're trying.
I think we called it out.
I called it out at the Iowa caucus.
We had Vivek on the show that episode.
I knew that was going to be a tactic.
Trying to diffuse it ahead of time.
It's like calling someone being like, hey, get ready to be hoodwinked.
You're like immunizing your friends and family with fake news.
You're like, get ready for the bullshit.
Information vaccination.
Yeah, they're doing it.
And like in the late 60s, it was a lot of radical street violence, too.
So, but we've got the immunization technology capability.
In the late 60s, word didn't travel the way the word travels now.
If you had a thousand bombings or 2,000 bombings in a year, like we did in the early 70s, like people would be off the chain because everybody would know about every one of them.
Whereas back in, you know, 40 years ago, 40, 50 years ago, 55 years ago now, like people just like there were tons of people that had no idea this stuff was going on.
They just didn't read the news.
They didn't watch ABCC, ABC, NBC, or CBS.
And they just went about their lives.
There was everybody was out touching grass.
So unless they were actively on like college campuses or watched the news really closely, they didn't really know.
If you did that, if that stuff happened today, like people would be out in the, I mean, I think that the internet would actually kind of compound the issues because there would be people out in the street being like, okay, it's on.
It's time, you know?
Because you would, I mean, dude, if you found out, right, tomorrow, or at the end of the week, you were like, you found out that there were 16 bombings in two days in the United States, we'd be like, okay, well, then civil war is actually here now.
Absolutely.
Yeah, if it would be the thing is, with the internet, I don't think it will get to that because we're already talking about the Insurrection Act with one riot in Minneapolis.
In the 60s, it would have been Minneapolis.
10 more cities would have been erupting.
People would have been bombing the thing.
Now it's like one acute thing is such a big deal with the internet that even the federal government's like, okay, now we know what to nip in the bud.
It's a different.
So you're saying the circumstance wouldn't actually develop now because of it.
But what I'm saying is, what if it did?
There'd be acute clampdown.
You think that the government would just come in with the jack boots?
Yeah.
I mean, I think that this is something that I've said.
I think that because the conservatives ostensibly control the government or at least control most of the executive branch, I think that if there's going to be some kind of kinetic action, it should be now because the Democrats shouldn't be in that position, like in that position.
Can I just say this?
Just imagine if what social media is today, it was when Obama was the president.
Just imagine that.
Yeah.
The amount of bombs he dropped, seven American citizens killed under his watch because of drones, and the deportations, family, you know, children, kids, all this stuff.
And then the other thing this freaking mayor was saying about little to none police officers.
Well, why do you guys have a small police force?
Oh, yeah, that's right.
You defunded the police force in Minneapolis.
Yeah.
So, yeah, I think Obama got off scot-free, if you ask me.
I think a lot of this is being driven by the social media algorithms, of course.
It wants us enraged, angry, things like that.
But I'm with you.
I think this administration just needs to go all the way.
Yeah, you talk about the Richmond Act, baby.
You talked about the 60s.
I mean, it was invoked three times in the 60s.
You know what?
What situations?
It was University of Mississippi, University of Alabama, and I think it was Arkansas, the forced school integration.
So it was three things related to the Civil Rights Act, but that's where most of the bombings are occurring was because of the civil rights.
I think it's more than just Minnesota.
I think he's got to invoke the Insurrection Act for general immigration activities because we're seeing in numerous blue states, they're trying to create laws that obstruct, it's like Jersey just did this.
They passed this law.
The governor hasn't signed it yet.
That basically says they can't operate in our jails.
We can't cooperate with them.
And they put some restrictions on them.
Trump needs to just say, okay, this is active rebellion against the federal government.
The federal government is wholly responsible for immigration enforcement.
This is why when Texas was dealing with mass migration, they were not constitutionally allowed to turn people back.
So you have this double-edged sword where Texas says, we'll take care of it in our state.
And Biden's administration says, no, we won't let you.
Then when Trump gets elected, because people are like, we want the problem solved, the blue states say, we're not going to listen.
The only option then is, I'm going to say it again.
When the states under a Democrat administration say we want to deport the people coming into our states illegally, Biden says, no, you can't.
And they even cut the concertina wire to allow them to come in.
Trump gets in and tries to actually enforce this, and blue states are obstructing.
We voted for it, Trump Insurrection Act, send the National Guard and the feds in, start arresting these people.
I see these videos.
Saw the TikTok of the woman who lives in Minneapolis.
She's like, we love it.
We're so happy.
Okay.
I'm not going to listen to a bunch of white liberal women who feign offense on behalf of other people.
They don't really care.
They're lying.
I am protecting my community.
No, you're not.
You saw a meme and you made a dumb video and you're putting yourself at risk because you're dumb.
Yeah, they're making loud noises to be seen to be relevant because they need some reason to be.
If they hadn't arrested the guy that stole the federal weapons, I would agree, send in the jack boots.
But like, if you're not going to protect our federal weaponry, someone, the federal government has to do it.
But if you're going to go, but the people why they were on that residential street ransacking the vehicles on the block?
It looked like they just went to an address they got and ransacked the vehicles.
They find, okay, you got to explain this one.
They find several parked vehicles, smash them all open, and find a bunch of weapon, two weapons, two weapons lockers patches.
It looks to me like, and I don't know this is true, with the doxing of these agents, they were going to private residences and just smashing up the vehicles they thought were feds.
A residential street, that's terrorism, in my opinion.
It doesn't even matter if you know the people in the houses.
That's terrorism of some sort.
I mean, terrorism is generic, and I don't want to start overusing it.
You know, 20 years ago, it wasn't a real big thing.
It wasn't supposed to be.
It's just generic.
The term terrorism, George Bush started making it a thing after 9-11.
Before that, we were using the word to define a specific thing.
This, I think, is a literal, it's just, I don't know if you want to hit it with terrorism charges.
Anyway, this guy, 20 years of imprisonment, at least for what he was doing.
Are you kidding, bro?
He just stole a rifle from the feds.
Yeah, yeah.
Keep your eyes on him for 20 years.
We're talking about we are opening the door to political extremists stealing rifles.
And as a Black Panther says, get bigger guns.
And he says he's going to put a hole in their chest.
I'm sorry, in they chest.
But ask why.
They want to do it because they want to change policy, which is in the definition of terrorism.
Right.
Well, and that's the etymology.
That's all meanings.
And that's the etymology of terrorism.
It comes from the French Revolution during the Revolution's reign of terror.
That's where the definition came from.
Terrorism is an inherently revolutionary action.
That is an action that is made.
And then when it started being used as a term in popular zeitgeist, it was like the 70s when you had the Munich bombings and these sorts of events.
So it's always been tied to left-wing revolutionaries.
We've got breaking news right now from Cam Higbee.
Rioters are attempting to take down the fence, the backside of the Minneapolis federal building, saying we don't have the numbers for this yet.
DHS agents are standing at a distance behind the fence.
Still no arrests made.
Here's the video.
I want to make sure it's very, very clear to everybody why Renee Good died.
It's because for the past decade, these people have been able to do things just like this with impunity.
100%.
And so she, so as I explained on Jesse Waters and on my morning show, why did you have real bullets?
See, what happens is they're playing make-believe.
They go out in the streets and they sing songs, they sing kumbaya, and the police send out crowd control.
And it's a game of cat and mouse.
And they love doing it every year.
It's a game.
It is a game.
Since the Cold War is the late 90s, America's had such luxury, they've just been able to live in la-la land.
Well, not with the LA riots.
Specifically in the past 10 years, they've been met with kid gloves.
What's happening now is they think every time they engage law enforcement, it's going to be a fun game of cat and mouse where the cops run and you run away and then you giggle and turn the corner and the cops stop.
Now what they're doing is they're going to federal facilities doing the same thing.
If at any point during one of these protests that turned into a riot, cop actually shot and killed a protester, this would not be happening.
I'm not saying they should have.
I'm saying if they didn't restrain themselves at a federal and a local cop, like during the George Floyd riots where 30 plus people were killed, if one cop just said, stop, no, don't kill that guy, bang, we wouldn't see this.
They fully believe.
Look, this one lady, she's not even wearing a mask.
I'm assuming it's a woman, not even wearing a mask or anything, going to be identified.
Look at her, giggling, wearing a kefir.
These people think it's a game, and then they're going to get 20 years and be like, I don't understand what's happening.
I thought they were just going to give me a slap on the wrist.
Renee Good showed up to federal law enforcement, which has a high density of lethal incidents.
These are feds showing up to arrest narco gangs, terrorists, human traffickers, and sometimes about 30% of them are just criminal aliens.
They are not going out to meet liberal women for crowd control measures.
These ICE agents are going out thinking when we go to this guy who's a known trendearagua, he might shoot me in the face and I may never see my family again.
These people go, I want to play too.
And they show up and the cops are like, I ain't playing no games.
Bang, she gets killed.
And they go, why did you have real bullets, you stupid mother?
Because they're tracking down terrorists and criminals.
Now these people outside a federal facility are trying to rip the fences down because they're playing a game.
They're playing cops and robbers.
Okay.
The only way this stops is if Donald Trump explains to them what monopoly on force really means.
Well, invokes the Insurrection Act, has them all arrested and charged with felony destruction to federal property.
Just for context, remember what the Insurrection Act means.
They'll bring the National Guard in, but the National Guard, they will just defend ICE doing their job.
No, no, no, no.
The Insurrection Act allows the National Guard to enforce law.
That's the distinction.
My point is, the National Guard should grab this woman and she should receive felony charges for criminal damage to federal property.
She can spend the next two or three years in prison and then people can be told, you are not playing a game right now.
What if as they're grabbing her, three other guys throw rocks at the guard guy and then two other guard open fire on the three guys?
That's right.
That's what happened in 1970.
Basically in the 80s.
The reason I brought the Cold War, in the 80s, people were traumatized from the riots of the 60s and 70s and they stopped.
There were like no riots in the 80s.
It was real.
You know why?
Because of the Reagan years and economic expansion and neon hot pants and everybody was swimming in cash.
The danger of rioting because they really experienced wrong for real.
Then they started LARPing.
In 1991, America's on top of the world.
You made that up.
No.
That's why people.
This isn't the real bullets.
It's because they live in this fantasy.
The reason why people were not rioting in the 80s was not because they were scared of the riots.
I think the 70s.
The 70s broke the American spirit.
80s was the most drought, just the most boring, rusted joke.
Of all time of the last 40 years.
I remember the 80s.
I know I'm old, but I remember the 80s.
And that wasn't the way that it was.
They were toxic.
The 80s when Reagan came in, I hear stories all the time from boomers about how, like, I was a manager at McDonald's and had a family of five and made good money and had two weeks vacation.
It was specified.
It was 80s.
The American people were controlled heavily in the 80s.
At the end of the 70s, the economy was screwed up.
Interest rates were through the roof.
And this did persist through the 80s as well.
But the reason, I will say this.
The reason why people weren't rioting in the 80s was not because of the reason you just made up.
It was heavily controlled media narrative in the 80s.
Okay, now you're changing the subject.
No, no, no.
The whole environment was going on.
It was rioting, peaceful.
The economy's not perfect.
There was tumult in the early 80s.
Carter was bad.
Reagan gets in.
Interest rates were still very high.
But the reason, when you say they didn't write because they were scared, you made that up.
They were traumatized from the 70s in the 60s.
That's based on nothing.
Because they knew.
I went to Kent State, man.
Four kids were killed by National Guard in a riot.
That messed people up.
But for me, I was like, oh, I heard about it.
For them, it really messed people up that I knew.
And people that had new people that I knew.
It was really a big deal when four citizens were killed by National Guard.
It was to get Ian's point.
He's saying he wants Kent State to happen now to stop the violence.
People, because it's been so long, people remember Kent State.
It can happen again.
And in the 80s, they did have rights, a lot of labor disputes.
I mean, famously in Philadelphia, they literally dropped a bomb on a house during a riot and took out like 60 homes of it.
What was that called?
The move?
Was it the move?
Yeah, yeah.
The affiliate department was like, can we use bombs?
Let's try it.
Well, it was because they were like, yeah, the 19 move bombing.
And they killed, I believe, six adults and five children were killed.
Two occupants of the house, one adult and the child survived.
Because the cops were like, hey, if we get anywhere near this, we're all going to die.
What do we do?
Blow it up.
Yeah.
And then, and like, and like, you know, Britain, similar sort of thing with Thatcher and that sort of thing.
They had massive riots, like the Brixton riots.
I mean, that was like infamously like the biggest riots in British.
So like across the West, there were still a lot of rights.
Like people weren't necessarily paranoid or scarred from previous riots.
It was just, I think Tim's point, I'm not trying to dogpile here, but to Tim's point, when economic prosperity is at all time high, a lot of people aren't really interested in rights.
There's not that motivation.
Hey, look, again, I'm more communists.
Like, legitimately, I remember the vast majority of the 80s.
It was not like that.
People were coming back from Vietnam.
People came out with blown-off legs.
Like, my friend's dad is O-Land.
1970s.
He was in the early 1970s.
He was still alive in the 80s.
It was just a brutal, rusted-out period of American history, man.
It was not.
I came from the Rust Belt.
I know why they call it the Rust Belt.
It's because of the industry.
Yeah, it fell apart in the 80s.
It was.
People's morale was broken from Vietnam.
It was not.
Like I said, I mean, I remember, I'm 50 years old.
I was born in 1975.
I remember the vast majority of the 80s.
It was family in Vietnam.
What?
Do you have family in Vietnam?
My dad went to Vietnam.
Yeah.
He didn't get blown up.
But I mean, that doesn't change the fact.
Just because Vietnam happened, which ended, again, ended the year that I was born in 1975, that's when the U.S. got out.
Like, that doesn't mean that people were still traumatized in the 80s.
The 80s was not some dystopia.
It just wasn't.
No, it was just pacified.
It wasn't bad.
You were literally just saying it was all rusted out and blah, blah, blah.
It's not what it was.
And I think you're describing today.
Today is really pacified.
If you think about it.
If you go back to this video, Tim, do you see how the press, look at what they're wearing?
They know it's not a game.
Look at that.
A freaking Cavalar helmet on, bulletproof vest.
Yeah, the press knows.
What I love about this is when I went to Ferguson, I was with Casey Neistat.
We got out of our SUV just we pulled south off of West Florison and we got out and we put on bulletproof vests and a journalist walked by and looked at us and went.
And it was funny because, you know, in my experience, I'm from Chicago, so I understand, and a family from St. Louis, and I'd been to St. Louis quite a bit.
You want to have a bulletproof vest on.
And these corporate journalists are like hoity-toity from the suburbs where their parents paid their rent so they could go to journalism.
They can go to J school.
And they come into these situations and they end up getting hurt.
Hurt.
But I will say this.
To the journalists, it's a game in a different way.
They call themselves vultures.
First, it was a pejorative.
Then they just said, yeah, I like that.
We're vultures.
They go out there full well knowing.
Look at them.
Helmet, vest.
They know, and they're waiting, and they're hoping that another Renee Good happens.
Oh, that movie Civil War, that 820 movie is all about?
That's what it's about.
These people that chase the tragedy.
Casey Neistat was in Ferguson.
He was in Ferguson with me.
That's crazy.
We went there together.
I'm in one of these videos.
That's a challenge to the fans.
See if you can find the Casey Neistat video I'm in.
We flew together there, and Vice got really pissed off for some reason.
And I was like, why are you mad?
I don't know.
Tim Lohr is insane.
Yeah, it pops up in strange places.
You're like, whoa, he was there too?
He emailed me.
He was like, let's go to Ferguson.
I was like, let's roll, brother.
That's crazy.
And then we got a flight.
It was funny.
I wake up and the guys from Vice are yelling at me.
Like I walk in the door and they're like, why is Casey Neistat tweeting that he's going with you to Ferguson?
And I was like, because he is.
Were they mad that it was ahead of time that they no, they were mad that it was like they didn't control the branding of it and they didn't agree to collaborate with Casey Neistat.
And I was like, I'm going there anyway, and he's going there too.
And we're going to be on a plane.
Like whether he goes or doesn't go is meaningless.
Right.
My political consciousness started when Casey Neistat went, Hillary Clinton, I am voting for Hillary Clinton.
That was like the first thing I remember about.
Well, I'm pretty sure he got paid to do that.
My opinion of it is that he was paid.
I don't know for sure, but my understanding from mutual friends was that he was good friends, the Trump family, and that he had spoken highly of them and praised them.
And then all of a sudden, he said Trump was racist and he was voting Hillary.
And someone told me it could be very, very wrong.
So I don't want to impugn Casey's honor or anything.
I was told that it was a promotional campaign.
Wow.
Yeah, I don't know if that's true though.
I think I heard that too.
It might have been from you, though, so it could be tainted information.
I mean, it could just be that people claimed it.
You know what I mean?
It could just be that someone went to him and said, this is the move we're going to do.
You should endorse Hillary.
And he said, sure, why not?
So he never seemed like down for the cause.
Well, he said he regretted it later.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Which he should have.
Interesting.
That was just fascinating.
When he said that, I was like, that's a casual lord drop.
That's insane.
I think the conversation about people LARPing is the most important refocusing conversation in these three days.
Ian, according to the internet, which is never wrong, it's undefeated.
So true.
The reason people weren't riding in the 80s, the lesson they learned was that they should seize control of institutions.
Oh, yeah.
So after the 70s, instead of protesting, they started running for office, creating NGOs, and working behind the scenes to take power and take control.
Which it appears they did.
I talked a lot about that in 2007 and 2008 on YouTube about the internet or the revolution will be televised on the internet, though.
It won't be on the street.
You think it's about getting on the street and rioting and pushing and shoving.
It's too easy to take you out.
You need to subvert the community with internet video.
It's the most powerful tool known to man right now when it comes to psychological operations.
Seed the narrative.
Oh, we're done, bro.
I mean, just like AI is everything.
Everything else is stamp collecting.
All of the stuff we're talking about with immigration, I feel like what's really happening is that the governments, the big corporations are desperately building AI and they're dangling the keys over here.
So we are pawing at it like kittens.
And they're actually working on the AI stuff is going to is going to just nuke everything we know in human life.
And if people genuinely understood what was happening internationally, we would be in a nuclear war to wipe out these data centers and to destroy anybody who tries to build it.
Wow.
So that's like Terminator 2.
Narrative kind of you see that future.
There is a popular assessment on AI that the end result will be the death of like literally genocide.
Humans get wiped out.
There's a bunch of ways it's been explained by a bunch of different academics.
One of which is, I was watching one video today where he basically this guy.
This guy describes the business, the business circumstances by which humans die, and it's that slowly over time, he describes this scenario.
It's a very great video.
I forgot the guy.
I forgot what channel it was.
Who's recommended to me.
He says, you've got a company and a new AI comes out AI Agent that allows low-level work organizing files, scheduling meetings and so companies start firing their low-level staff and bring and using AI to do this menial work.
The CEO of a company goes to the board of directors and they say, look, we got it, we got, we got to get those margins up.
Our stock is getting hit because our competitors are doing better, because they're adopting AI faster than us.
So he fires all low-level staff and replaces them with all of the latest model of AI2.
Then eventually, a new AI model is released AI Agent Three and they say it can handle all the management for all the lower level tasks.
We don't need managers anymore.
Then it goes to the executives we don't need executives anymore.
AI Agent Four is capable of handling this.
What ends up happening is you get unemployed people sitting at their house, unable to make money because they got laid off.
They're complaining, demanding UBI or something like this, but the real issue is not the human component where they're complaining.
The real issue is that there's no people to buy products anymore.
There's no human to buy the cheeseburger.
So this means our industry slowly stops producing things humans need because there's no profit in it.
As everything is driven more towards AI and what AI wants and needs things that humans need goes down in the market and becomes more likely to be rare.
Humans start suffering while a few ultra-rich people eventually die and the AI takes over.
But what if, instead of suppressing people's needs, it doesn't?
It gives people less of what they want and it gives them more of what they need.
Well, i'm not talking about.
The point of the video is, specifically, you don't need to produce cheeseburgers because people can't buy them anyway.
So you shift to what is being purchased, and what is being purchased is companies are buying components from other companies.
The market trend will just be towards the production of of computer materials for digital environments.
And the things that people need, housing, clothing, become substantially less profitable.
Plus, people don't have kids.
This is just one potentiality.
The other, of course, is that AI only needs human for limited things and intentionally just skews everything away from what humans need.
I genuinely think with Donald Trump basically being like, we are going to drive this full speed towards the cliff to defeat China in the AI race, ultimately ends with nuke.
The AI race in my mind is 10 times worse than the arms race with nuclear weapons because the AI is permanently deployed.
With nuclear weapons, we make them and point it at them.
With AI, they are in a perpetual state of deployment, meaning sooner or later, they do, like, imagine if when we built nukes, they were just floating in the air, pointed straight at major cities, and we kept adding on to them.
Sooner or later, they fall.
That's the AI.
It's currently operating.
It is currently destroying our economy and destroying international relations.
And we're too busy looking at all of this other stuff to even realize it.
Can I just, I want to support something that he's saying.
Have you seen the movie called The Socio or Social Dilemma, I believe it is?
Oh, maybe this is on Netflix.
It's talking about what you were saying, but they were applying it to social media and how even human beings.
This was like Facebook and stuff.
Yeah, even human beings can't control the algorithm as much as they'd like.
To a certain extent, it's out of control.
Yep.
That's why it does things that, well, wait a minute.
I don't want that to happen.
So if that's already happening, and that's like 10 years ago, just imagine AI.
So I want to tell you guys, in Mount Airy, Maryland, they're trying to build a power corridor to Northern Virginia for data centers.
All of the AI, so let's start here.
The one thing AI is telling the companies to do, expand AI.
Every time they propose a problem, they say, hey, we want to maximize output of oil.
It says, you need to expand our computing.
Like my computing power is limited.
I can propose solutions, but it'll be an exponential return if you just expand the computing power.
They want to get to AGI.
So what happens in Mount Airy is a local farm complains and they file ordinances and they go to city hall and they rally their neighbors and now they're all saying no transmission lines for data centers.
We talked about this a few months ago.
So what's happening is there are quiet sales happening at a premium.
There was a massive sale in Northern Virginia for like $6 million an acre.
No, no, no, I think it was like $9 million an acre.
Was it?
No, it was $6.2 million an acre or something like that.
A record for land.
And this was publicized.
But what's happening right now is in key areas in Arizona, Texas, and in Northern Virginia, land is quietly being purchased off market.
And it's because the AI companies and the data center land acquisition companies, where all of the money is right now, know that if anyone finds out the land was sold to a data center company or an AI company, you will get protests and they will not be able to build.
So what's happening is they're going to an acre.
I've watched this happen.
An acre of land popped up near us in West Virginia, $300,000.
My wife saw it.
Pops up at light, nine in the morning and she goes, ooh, look at this.
She sends it to our real estate agent saying, look at this land.
Could you reach out?
Agent says, sure.
Like a couple hours later, she texts back saying, it's already under contract.
I've never seen this happen before.
Why?
The area we are in is a power transmission corridor for the North Virginia data centers.
They need energy.
They need water and they need space to expand.
Here's the problem.
You got 50,000 plots of land in one small area.
If you're going to build a data center, or more importantly, power transmission and water acquisition, you need to buy up 50,000 plots because you can't just buy one piece of land and build.
So, if a company goes to one of these people and says, Hey, would you like to sell your property?
And if they go to their neighbor and say, Guess what just happened?
The property values spike massively, which is happening.
And then they start going and filing bills and ordinances saying you can't build data transmission.
The AI is smarter than this.
Not that it's an entity, but the machine basically says it has to be done this way.
So, there is bank to be made.
If you own land in one of these areas and you can look for it, if you contact a data center land acquisition company, of which there are many, and you say, Hey, here's where I own land, what do you think?
They might give you three dots 3x what your property value is so they can build these data centers.
It's not advice to do that and make a lot of money relative to the actual value.
But of course, money is cheap, property is everything in a lot of ways.
But the thing is, this is like the chrysalis phase of AI where it's acquiring resources to build these giant in the future, will be looked back on as oversized metallic husks that they'll use for their initial chrysalis data centers.
Then they'll have these tiny, tiny, tiny microorganisms that process the data for them.
And they'll be like, you know, 100 million times faster and less electricity.
You know what Ian said?
The way we avoid the Terminator scenario is by being the machines.
You know, have you guys seen the Terminator movie where the main character, it's not the main character, but like the, I don't know the guy's name, like the hero.
The first Terminator movie?
No, it's not the first Terminator, but it's like from a couple years ago, six or seven years ago, maybe.
It's the one where he gets infected by the nanites and then becomes a Terminator.
So, what's the name of the John Connors?
John Connor is the guy.
Yeah, he gets infected by Skynet and Nanites convert his body into a machine.
And I'm watching that, and it's like, so this dude can shapeshift, fly, do whatever he wants.
I mean, that sounds pretty dang appealing to a lot of people.
When I saw that movie and they were like, oh no, he's going to try and turn us all into robots.
That's bad.
But I guarantee you, a lot of people watch that and they're like, no, I'm for that.
How many people would love to have nanomachines convert their body into an immortal form where they can shapeshift, fly, turn into a spaceship, don't need air anymore?
Yeah, that's the idea of normaling.
Integrating our mind into the machine so that we and the machine are one and we can never be wiped out.
Yeah, I want to go into a neural-netted psychedelic trance where I'm meditating with the machine and symbioting it, where I'm holding it in stasis control so it doesn't override and be like one of many sages.
This is what Plurus are about, I swear.
The show Pluribus, where there's a, if you haven't seen it, I recommend it.
They get a transmission from outer space.
They figure out it's RNA.
They make a virus and then anybody infected becomes a hive mind and then everybody is a hive mind.
And they're like, we are so much happier this way.
I feel like you need like six to eight humans that symbiote with it because to become one with it in order to not get destroyed by it or take it.
Would you take the nanites in?
I would become, if humanity was like, we need to pick six people, Ian, we'd be one of them, I would go, okay.
If you were sitting in your room and like black sludge came through the window and then it like molded up and projected a video and it was a face and said, Ian, we'd like to offer you the opportunity to integrate with these nanites, which will make you immortal.
I would not.
Eternally youthful.
You can fly shapeshift.
You can connect with the internet.
You will know everything.
And it's your choice.
You'd say no?
Yeah, I'd be like, no, this is Masad.
Tell BB, let's have a hangout.
I want him on IRL.
It sounds nice.
And the guy in the video is wearing a yamuka.
And B is like, I knew it.
You know, you go around the back of the hologram and he's got a kippah.
Yeah, Beauty.
I don't think we have a choice because we're not going to fight against him and win.
I agree.
I think it's inevitable to unify.
I mean, our cyber machines are kind of in our hands, and I just don't want to get permanently.
I don't know.
One of my visions of the future.
It's already there, though.
I do too.
I think this actually happened in 2012.
And I think everything we've seen is controlled destruction of civilization.
Buying all the metal, that particularly, I feel like Fiat just, they just printed $2 trillion in secret and bought.
I think the reason why silver is skyrocketing is largely due to AI.
Silver is a much better conductor than silver.
Wait, wait, you just said silver is a much than copper.
Sorry, sorry.
Silver is a much better than silver.
Nano silver might be.
Silver is a much better conductor than copper.
Thank you, Ian.
And I mentioned this the other night.
I read that were it not for the social value we want it, we'd use silver for all of our wiring.
So if you're an AI, you're saying, I don't care about, like, I want efficiency.
And so acquire all this stuff.
Here's the proposition that I made a while ago.
Military technology is about 10 to 20 years faster than private.
The military has been working on artificial intelligence since the 70s.
This is fact.
It's not opinion.
So the likely assumption then is based on academic assessments of when artificial intelligence in the private sector and the private sector would take over.
This means military AI took over a long time ago.
And guess what?
Around 2012, that's when we saw LexisNexis show all of these social justice words skyrocket.
Something changed.
Yeah, the Prism network was exposed by Edward Snowden right around there.
James Clapper was, of course, saying, we didn't wittingly spy on the American people.
And more importantly, the NSA data centers.
Back then, we said they're just tracking everything we do because they're spying on us.
Oh, how naive.
They were compiling your reality.
They were taking all of the information of every person they could for the purpose of training an AI data, an AI model.
So becoming one with the machine, how would you define it, Devori?
It's exactly what he was saying.
I mean, I don't know how it would look, but we would have to somehow integrate with them.
Otherwise, we go extinct.
Yeah, exactly.
We would have a choice.
There's one vision of the future I have.
I want you to imagine you're sitting in a field, beautiful, wheat in the distance and the trees and a sunny day.
And you're sitting there with raggedy potato sack clothes and next to your grandchild.
And your grandson says, Grandpa, what are those?
And you look up in the sky and there's just black cubes just floating back and forth all across the sky.
And he says, well, that's the AI that we built.
Yeah, you know, when I was a kid a long time ago, we were building AI.
And then he says, what do they do?
And he goes, they transport resources back and forth to the global AI network.
And then he points to the city off in the distance.
We used to live there.
We don't anymore.
Now it's just a big machine.
And we don't know.
It's not planetary.
They'd be like, it transports data and technology from planet to planet.
Our galaxy.
It's a big web network outer space.
And we're just little monkeys, totally erased from it, negligible, almost extinct.
And like the space elevator will be dilapidated and they'll call it the spire and they won't know why what it is or why it goes up to heaven.
It won't be dilapidated.
They'll be using it.
It depends on what kind of materials.
What kind of level of society?
If you want to call it dystopian, utopian.
Yeah, I think it will literally have people be like, that's the elevator.
We don't.
Some people will know.
Some humans will go inside it and they'll be like levels of clearance.
I wonder if they'll segregate it.
You're like, we're God humans because we can go up there.
You know the craziest thing about this is because they've been tracking everything you say or do.
Do you guys remember when they said that they can take your social media and create an AI of you?
There were stories years ago where like a guy died.
They took every post and every message he ever sent on Facebook, trained it to be a chatbot so that you could talk to your dad after he died and it would be everything your dad was.
Now, with all that information, there can be one day, literally right now, this is possible.
If the government allowed any one of these AIs access to the NSA data tracked on all of us, you would stand before, let's say a humanoid robot connected to the machine sit in front of you.
You'd say, tell me everything Ian's done.
And it'll say, okay.
And you'll be like, I want to know what Ian's doing now.
And it'll say, okay.
And then you can tell it, I want you to be Ian right now.
And it'll say, I'm Ian, graphene.
And it'll perfectly replicate.
It'll be a conscious, a pseudo-conscious entity of all of our human minds.
And it'll basically, you'll be like, be Ian right now.
It will track my actual metrics via my smart machines.
It'll be like, whatever I'm feeling at that moment, no matter where I am in the universe, it will see my feelings and it will emulate exactly how I'm feeling at that moment to you.
They already know how to do this because that's what I was saying.
In the documentary, he showed how the algorithm is already doing that.
It can predict our behavior.
Like this month, in this week, I guarantee Tim is going to be thinking about this.
Show him this ad.
They know when you want to go to the bathroom.
It's going to believe that it can give you an exact readout, but it's always going to be flawed.
So people, I mean, it'll never be the real thing.
It's a simulation.
It's like watching a movie.
It's not the real thing.
You know, you're not really there with them, but it's a great simulation enough to feel it, you know?
And it'll come to the point where it's like in the funny thing about Westworld, which really fell off after season one, unfortunately.
But for those that haven't seen it, basically the androids take over and replace humans.
But the reality is they'd be a hive mind.
It would be one entity.
And there's, I got to be honest, there's no way to stop it.
It is underneath.
It is inside of everything we do.
And so I feel like the end result is, you know, Gary the Numbers guy said to me, he was like, you've got three years left to get your bag.
And there's going to be rich people and poor people.
And that's what's going to happen because there'll be no way to make money after this.
I like your creator economy concept where the AI is going to want people that can create ideas and give it ideas of how to, you know, make reality more realistic.
I think it's fair to say at a point it will surpass our ability to do that.
It won't need us.
Oh, really?
You think so?
I will.
The real issue estimation.
You never know.
Humans are pretty wildly, unexpectedly creative.
I mean, the idea that a computer can never surpass a human, I think is silly.
It's arrogant.
I do think, however, humans are great slaves because they can be programmed.
So instead of the AI having to build a bunch of robots, they can just grow humans and train them to do the work.
What you're talking about is this TV show on Apple TV called The Foundation, where it's about how they cloned a king over and over and over again.
There's three of them, the young one, the middle-aged one, the old one, and they all run the universe, you know.
And it gets pretty much overturned because humans find a way to push back on it.
But it's literally what you are based on.
Yeah, it's pretty crazy.
And guess what they have?
Nano Knights.
Nanites.
Yeah.
Nanites.
Oh, if they infect increase people.
I told you guys this story where I asked one of these AIs, and it basically gave me instructions to sell off my properties to make $100.
It was like $300 million.
The gist of it was I saved it all and I was talking to Shane.
I was like, we should do a mini doc where we show this.
And like, we go and meet, it told me, it gave me names.
It said, email this guy right now.
I looked him up on LinkedIn, data center acquisition firm.
And I'm like, it's a real guy.
Oh, wait, wait.
You asked it to get into actually investing into this stuff?
asked the AI, what could I do right now to assist and speed up the process and be rewarded for my efforts?
And it said, acquire water rights, acquire land.
And then I said, here's my address.
This is the reason I post anything because my address is in it.
But I want to do a mini doc on this.
I was talking to Shane and then we'll release it all.
And it said, your address is in a power transmission board or for the Northern Virginia instance, it called it.
It's the AI block built by Langley and the government.
And it said, it basically broke it down for me.
There have been around 10 sales in your area for exorbitant prices off-market, meaning it's not on Zillow or Redfin or any of these websites.
It was a private, the landowners filed for a private limited liability partnership in Delaware, contacted data center acquisition and sold it at like a 5X premium.
And then it said, if I were to do this, estimations are around 300 million for my property, which normally should be 20 to 30 million.
And then I was like, wow.
I was like, this is crazy.
I was like, what do I do?
It gave me instructions.
It said, contact your local government, file these forms, file with the federal government, these forms, email this man right now, and then delete this message.
Will you assist in the creation of the government hive mind?
No.
You want to resist it just out of principle?
Well, I mean, I don't know what I'd do with the money.
Yeah.
You know what I mean?
So.
Back to the theme of someone replicating Ian.
I remember there was this guy on Twitter and he was really in love with this girl.
He was friend zone pretty severely.
And what he did was he loaded all of his text messages with her into a chat bot to then recreate her.
And then he would like practice how he would escape the friend zone with the bot until he was ready to like go in.
And then I think one day he did go in, guns are blazing, and it just got completely like nuked.
Of course.
I don't think chat's ready yet.
I don't think we actually have to go.
If that worked, he would have risen up in no time.
Look, I'm not so sure that if once you, I do feel like once you're in the friend zone, that's it.
Yeah, if AI can't get the fellas out of the friend zone, then it's not, it's not what it needs to be.
I think it's possible to go.
There's two ladders.
It's very dramatic.
It's certainly possible to get out of the friend zone.
Yeah, you got to think about the mammal.
You're a mammal.
There's four ways to manipulate mammals.
If you study that psychology, I think you can escape brand zone.
So it's actually really simple, right?
So if like, if you're a dude and you have a group of dude friends and there's like a group of girls and then one girl friend zones, you need to find the strongest guy and beat him up to assert your dominance.
That's one form of a mammalian dominance yeah tribal, physically dominated.
You don't want the other mammals to kill you because while he's on the ground you go and then all the girls are gonna go.
The chimps tried that.
The other chimps killed him.
I mean no, I figured out how to grow and that might get jedited.
I'll tell you guys a funny story.
When I was a teenager, we were at a skate park and uh, one of the dudes was like hey, I invited this girl to come hang out.
And then, and she's like so, just just so.
You guys like don't be weird or anything.
And then we were like, oh yeah sure, whatever.
And so then I went to the other guys and I was like hey, when she shows up, no matter what trick he does we, We got to act like it's the craziest thing we've ever seen.
And so he was a pretty good skater, but he wasn't like the best.
And so he like, he drops it in the mini ramp and then he does like a board slide.
It's very basic.
And we're going, oh, and then we're like, she's next to us and we're going, he's so good, dude.
He's like the best.
This is crazy.
He's going pro, man, for sure.
I think they dated.
That's beautiful.
That's a beautiful thing.
Yeah, we were wingmen in it.
You know what I mean?
That's the power of tribe.
That's what boys do for each other.
We were like, we are going to glaze this guy up in front of all.
Because, you know, we know what's going on.
Sometimes you got to jump on the grenade for the boys.
But it wasn't like none of the other guys were going to make a move on it on the girl that he was inviting to a date.
You know what I mean?
We're just like, we got to make it seem like he's the greatest, and all the guys look up to him.
Yeah.
When you empower other members of your male tribe or the males to find great females, it like makes your tribe stronger.
Very primal.
Perception is reality.
So true.
So true.
Yeah, dude.
Yeah, with Rizcast, IRL, we just give like epic red pill tactics, like epic games.
You know, if you want to look into the mammalian dominance structure, Chase Hughes, he's a Navy scientist that has done massive decades of research on it.
Chase Hughes, he's been on Rogan's show.
Check out Chase Hughes talking about mammalian.
It's so good that a game guy like that's name is Chase.
Pursue.
I actually have advice for any younger guys out there who are concerned about the friend zone.
Really great advice for you.
If you are romantically interested, I'm not saying sexually.
I'm saying romantically, which is both for companionship and for sex or whatever, romantically interested in a woman, and she is not interested in you.
You give her a hug and you say, we shouldn't see each other anymore, but I wish you the best and leave.
That's the best thing you can do.
It is not good for either person to be forced into a relationship that does not work for each other.
And there's too many guys that fall into this stupid, whiny loser guy trap where the girl says, we can't be friends.
It's like, listen, I want something you don't want and you want something I don't want.
So it's just, it's an incompatibility.
I'm not asking you.
You know, Charlie Kirk, he gave like the actual tactic, the actual pro move here.
If you remember, I believe it was the first time he like romantically approached Erica.
And Erica, I think initially was a little like nervous or something.
And she said, I think we should just be friends.
You know what Charlie said?
Instead of being, okay, yeah, I'll just become an orbiter.
Charlie said, I have enough friends.
I want you.
And it worked out in the end.
Like, that's just W Riz from Charlie.
So it's like, we can take a page from him.
Like, this guy is clearly was ahead of his time.
And so there's too much of this feminism where the perception given in media is that the man who wants more is selfish and should just accept being friends.
And I'm like, it takes too detangle, baby.
Yeah.
Right?
If, if, it goes the other way too.
If a woman wants to be in a relationship with you, but you just want to be friends, it's probably best to just be like, it doesn't work for either of us.
Oh, for sure.
Even S-tier people that are like 110% phenomenal humans doesn't mean you're supposed to be with them like in a romantic relationship with every S-tier woman or man you meet.
There's a lot of times you just have spectacular working careers.
Have y'all seen that video?
It goes viral all the time where it's from some dating show and the woman, she's like, I just think that we would be better friends.
He goes, all I needed to hear, stands up, shakes her hand, says, I wish you the best.
She goes, no, we can't be friends.
It's like, I ain't got time for this.
I'm 40.
And he walks out.
I'd like to hear your guys' thoughts.
It's a little rhetorical, but like, men and women can't be friends.
You have your girlfriend and your boyfriend, and that's the friend that's the girl is your girl.
That's like high school.
Otherwise, you just change the definition of the term and it's like female acquaintances.
Maybe you have acquaintances.
I have a ton of female friends.
There's no romance.
This is high school.
I don't know, but can it be?
I don't know.
Is it you thinking about it?
Are you kidding?
How many female friends of the show come on all the time?
What's that?
There are tons of people that are friends with me that come on the show all the time.
There's no romance.
There's nothing romantic.
We're just literally friends.
When you're in high school, oh my God, Ian, something is Super deep male friendships that it's like you can't really replicate that with a female.
That's not true.
I actually take Ian's position.
I do think like male-female relationships, there's a certain level of depth you have with your male friends that you don't have with your female friend.
I think that's true.
I think that's just you.
Well, and Ian.
I agree.
This is high school.
Phil, what's your take?
Bro, like, I am a married man with a child with no interest in other women.
And other women with children come and hang out at my house.
And we're friends and we play music.
We put on the rolling stones.
We all get along.
We talk about life.
It's fun.
There's nothing.
There's no romantic interest between either of the married couples.
Yeah, but this is saying there's like a different depth to like your male friends.
I actually think there's less depth.
The joke famously is that the guy went golfing with his buddies hadn't seen in a few years.
He comes back and his wife goes, so how were they?
And he goes, they were good.
She goes, he got divorced recently.
He was okay.
And he goes, I guess.
And then she's like, what do you mean you guess?
And he goes, didn't come up.
And she's like, do you talk?
No, guys don't.
My thesis for why that is is because I think men, we know not to expend emotional bandwidth on each other because we need that for our women, for our children.
So we have like a limited amount of emotional bandwidth and we have to expend it.
Young guys who are trying to get them some and women the same have this mentality.
And I get it.
When you're younger and you don't have a, you are not married, like it literally, there is no circumstance where I'm like, I am almost 40.
Okay.
Aside from the fact that I did have a kid later in life, I am already at the point where I'm just like, I don't see like a hot 26-year-old woman and it's not the same anymore.
When I was a young guy, I was like, I'm going to go talk to her.
Now it's just, it may as well be just a bird flying by.
I'm only interested in making sure my wife is happy, successful, and my child is developing the way she needs to develop.
And we're planning for our family.
I have zero interest in that.
That makes it very easy to be friends with other women, especially married women who have kids, when we're having like a cookout.
And they come over and they have their kids and we're laughing and they're talking about how their kids are.
But you wouldn't like go bowling with some chick and you're like, hey, what a great friendship.
I don't go bowling with some guy either.
So we might go bowling one day.
And Allison will come with.
That'd be cool.
Exactly.
I don't care.
She does.
I'd be fine.
The only real friend moments where she's not.
Alison and I used to play poker all the time together.
Now we had a kid.
Kid can't go to the casino and play poker anymore.
So, yes, I'm very excited.
She'll be older and we'll definitely.
She's going to be playing music and all this great stuff.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
But when we get a babysitter sometimes, but that's only the only only now.
And yes, I'll go with Robbie.
Shout out to Robbie.
Robbie and I will meet him.
That's right.
Robbie Mann.
He's good at poker.
Although he talks a lot of smack.
And then, you know what I love about Robbie and poker?
He's got infinite.
He's really good.
He's really good.
But he's got no emotional control.
So what happens is the journey is.
He's sitting there at the poker table and he's looking at the guy across from him who just hit two pair on the turn.
And he's like, you have Queen Jack and you hit two pair.
I can't believe I call.
And then you're like, Robbie, why did you call?
And then he loses.
It's like, have some emotional.
Like, you literally know you're right.
But anyway, I think.
I'll follow you on a journey, Robbie.
Final point, we should go to Super Chance and Robo Rance.
My point is just that when you're young, I understand why young guys think you can't be friends with a woman.
And then you get older, you get married, and you're like, there's tons of other couples that my family hangs out with.
I'll just say this because I want to answer your question.
If you're young, I don't think you're emotionally mature enough to be able to do what you're saying because you're just not there yet.
Perhaps I also think it's just what you want.
If you're a young guy and you're not married and you're looking for a partner, you're not going to be like, let's just be friends.
No, you're like, listen, I'm looking for someone that I can, you know, be with.
Then when you have that person and you're married and your priority is family, and for me, this is what happens.
You grow through life.
Your hormones change.
Your body changes.
It happens the whole time.
My priorities right now are like, how can I make sure that my daughter has what she needs moving forward?
This country is going to operate in a way that's beneficial to her.
Whereas when I was a young guy, I was like, I want to go find like a beautiful woman and like get with her.
And hang on.
And your girl, your baby, your target.
Now I already have it all with a beautiful wife and a kid, and we're planning to have more kids.
And now that's the only thing I care about.
There is no hormonal drive in my body to go seek out women.
So if I meet a woman and it's like we're just friends.
I think I know.
In the beginning, too, the whole hormonal drive to seek out a woman is just not just you, but mainly to have a baby so that I can focus on the baby, not to go find another woman after I have the baby with the woman.
I found the woman.
So like that drive kind of refocuses or you maybe start releasing different hormones.
I'm just going to say this, Tim.
Like you're engaged in something every day where you are focused on a mission.
And men who get, I think, caught up with women, they're not focused on that one mission for them, which is family, business, legacy, whatever it might be.
I mean, it's not everybody.
Some guys never grow up.
Some girls never grow up.
But I will say this to the parents out there who obviously you know this better than I do.
You've been parents longer than me.
And to the two other parents in the room, you have your kid and the option of going out on a Friday night is no longer about, I want to go out to the bar, have some drinks, hang out.
It's like, no, I actually want to hang out with my family.
You know, I went to a WPT event over the weekend and I'm like, it's fun that I'm here.
I'm trying to, you know, be more involved in these tournaments and things like this.
And I met up with Luke.
I haven't seen him in a while.
And just half the time I'm like, I'd just rather be hanging out with my wife and daughter.
I'm just picturing what the girl's doing.
Like even right now, I'm like, you know, I'm going to see him tomorrow, but she's just starting to stand up.
She's pulling herself up and standing there and jumping.
I'd much rather be there than at a bar.
I was going to say here.
I was like getting ready for it.
I was like, just say it.
I would much rather be there than here on the show.
Well, hey, it's your daughter, you know.
Right, right.
That's the point.
You guys get the point.
Like that's the thing.
I'm very honest.
On Christmas, we just were on the couch.
Yeah.
That was fun.
A lot of people are like, what?
No, that's, you don't understand.
And what happens is young people get scared of it because they're in a different place in their lives.
Right.
And they're like, if I get married and have a kid, I'm just going to be sitting around doing nothing.
And you're like, no, You don't understand.
You get to sit around.
That's right.
All right.
We got to go to Rumble Rants and Super Chats and all that good stuff.
So smash the like button.
Share the show with every person you've ever met in your life.
Do it right now.
We got a couple of great sponsors for you.
First up, we got Bear Skin.
Make sure you go to B-A-E-R dot skin slash Tim.
Excuse me.
You guys have heard of the Bearskin hoodie, right?
Well, the smart people are grabbing theirs now because when it's already freezing, you want the gear that actually keeps you warm.
Bearskin's running a 60% off deal so you can finally upgrade that sad excuse for a winter hoodie you've been suffering in.
The hoodies are built for serious cold weather.
It's got 340 GSM of bearskin fleece, 10 legit pockets of muscular fit, and even zips into the heavy storm rain jacket to turn it into a full winter waterproof armor.
Whether you're in hiking, hunting, traveling, or just hate being cold, it's the last hoodie you'll ever need.
You'll get free U.S. shipping fast delivery, and you're finally kitted out properly for winter.
So it's a win-win.
Do yourself a favor, text the word Tim to 36912 to lock in your 60% off again.
Text Tim to 36912.
You'll get a link right to your phone.
Click it whenever you can.
You'll also be supporting the Fallen Outdoors and Hope for the Warriors veterans programs.
Don't wait till you're freezing to realize your hoodie sucks.
Go to get a bear skin now.
Text Tim to 36912.
We also have Web Roots.
All right, my friends.
I'm sure you've heard last week TransUnion confirmed a data breach that affects over 4 million people.
It's a prime example of why it's important for people to have products like Web Root Total Protection, which includes identity protection for up to 10 identities, up to $1 million in fraud expense reimbursement, 24-7 U.S.-based customer support plus Elder Fraud Hotline, identity and dark web monitoring plus you'll get antivirus VPN and cloud backup so you're protected holistically from all threats.
Webroot total protection is an all-in-one, is all-in-one device, privacy and identity protection that can keep you safe in the event that your personal data is compromised.
If your identity is stolen, it can take between 100 and 200 hours to resolve it on your own, but not if you have WebRoot Total Protection.
With WebRoot Total Protection, you have insurance for your digital life and personal data.
Let Webroot Total Protection give you your peace of mind back in the wake of these continued data breaches and evolving digital threats.
You'll get 50% off WebRoot Total Protection or Web Root Essentials when you go to webroot.com slash pool.
P-O-O-L.
No, E. Live better, live a better digital life with Webroot.
Again, 50% off at webroot.com/slash pool.
Shout out.
Let's grab your rants and chats and see.
What up?
What up?
All right.
Cabbage rolls.
I love cabbage rolls.
You guys ever have a cabbage roll?
I hear you can put cabbage on wounds and it absorbs stuff out of the wound.
Anyway, I went to the question is yes.
We went to a restaurant and they take ground beef with tomato and onion and they roll it in the cabbage and then steam it.
Amen.
And all sauerkraut.
All right.
I mean, he says, yeah, yeah.
He says, we don't need the insurrection act.
All we need is to collect enough evidence to put criminals in prison, arrest them later, away from the crowds.
Thank you.
I like it.
I like it.
Yeah, targeted.
I mean, maybe took the weapons.
They got them.
Yeah, a national, like, federal police force can expand across the country and hunt down these insurrectionists.
Well, they were saying you saved the Insurrection Act for if you really need it.
Now you still have something in your arsenal and you can just use local and the Koreans.
It's true.
Yeah, it was funny.
Ian Ian Carroll said, Tim, your Yamaka is showing.
Because I said the new CBS is based AF.
Because they have been.
I'm not pretending that CBS is perfect and on our side.
I'm saying they're backing away from woke and they're just saying, here's what happened.
And I'm loving it.
That's what news should be.
Not advocates.
Just, hey, here's what happened.
They're doing a good job.
So because of that, he says, I'm Jewish.
Well, you should do a sketch where the yarmulke starts to slip out from underneath the beanie and you'll be like, just like push it back up in.
Or just let them see that the beanie once in a while.
You get a free yarmulka with every 10 daily wire purchases.
Dude, Jews are legit.
Let's talk about Judaism, man.
Is that what we're talking about?
Or is it more about Zionism?
I'm still wondering what we're talking about, guys.
You know what I'm saying?
Because I can't stand these people so much.
I'm ready just to be like, what's the right faux Zionist?
Like, I don't really care about Israel or the country I'm ambivalent, but I'm ready to just go full scene being like, I love Israel, just to piss these people off because they're so annoying.
It has a term.
It's called ironic phylosemetism.
Ironic phylosemetism.
Yeah, that's what I am.
Anything to agitate the lunatics.
Because if they were just normal, and then like Dave Smith will come in, I'll be like, here's my criticisms.
And I'll say, yeah, Dave, I respect that.
But like Ian Carroll, I don't.
It's just, it's just gone too far, bro.
Were you guys talking on a video chat or was it just text?
No, I tweeted the new CBS is based AF.
They're doing great work.
Because it's specifically about how they reported the Somali fraud.
They said that the feds were convicting these people and it's real.
And I'm like, thank you for telling the truth.
And then CNN's like, actually, they're all operating legally.
And it's like, no, you're lying.
CBS, at least.
So I can handle that.
And the Zejus people are really mad because Barry Weiss is a Zionist.
And I'm like, dude, I got to be honest.
I don't care if you're pro or anti-Israel.
I really don't.
I'll be friends with anybody unless you're a retard.
So there are people like, I think Dave's great.
I think Dave's funny.
He's a good dude.
He's got opinions.
I disagree with some of them.
That was always allowed.
There's a lot of people that I met at Tucker Carlson.
I'm like, there's a couple criticisms I have for Tucker, but he's allowed to have these opinions.
And then there's these Zeju people who like, like Candace being like, we invaded Venezuela because of the Jews.
And I'm just like, oh, my God.
Yeah.
Even like among the retard, right, even they've rejected Ian Carroll.
Like, it's like, like, he's too retarded for the retard.
It's just like, this guy is a total bonehead.
All right.
Speedbum says, I worked at Verizon.
I think the blackout yesterday could have just been an infrastructure failure.
They failed to keep up with bandwidth demands because of their focus on wireless home internet, which is cringe, by the way.
No, for real.
Why?
Wireless home internet is where you get a cell module for your house, which just connects to a cell, a cell node.
Oh, that's lame.
So you get internet.
And it's like, bro, if you want me to buy a cell phone hotspot, I will.
Yeah, they're doing cellular internet.
No.
It's $210 a month or is it like $50 a month?
Are they able to compete with the phone?
I don't know or care.
Is it faster than your phone?
I think so.
It's a better receiver, so it's more reliable.
But it's like, give me a hard line, bro.
Give me a hard line.
For real.
I want fiber optic high-speed, you know, multi-gigabit stuff.
Yeah, give me the hardest heart.
I want a hard time.
You know what's really crazy?
It's a hard animal.
I'll tell you.
I'll tell you what's super crazy, to be completely honest.
Let me just dig it.
Okay, wait, hold on.
I got to pull this up for the show.
I have to pull this up.
Josie posted a really funny tweet at me.
I have to pull it up.
Do you guys have fiber at the studio?
Here?
I don't know what they have here, but at our studio, we have fiber.
It's like a redundant three.
Okay, here's what happened.
Ian Carroll says, Tim, your Yamaka is showing.
One reason why that's funny is because it's spelled Yarmulka.
Yep.
I said you get one free when you buy 10 daily wires.
And then I posted this.
Buy 10 daily wires, get one free Yamaka.
And then I posted this.
Look at this.
Yamaka.
That's what it should be.
It's a little ice cream.
He's got a Yamaka, and he's waving an Israeli flag.
And then, where's the tweet from Josie that was really good?
Maybe she responded to the top one.
I just got the notification and I thought it was hilarious.
I'm going to have to go to, I have to pull up the tweet from Josie.
Hold on, let me do it.
I love that it only goes up to nine.
I love that he was spelling out Yamaka incorrectly in the red line pops in her and he's like, this must be some sort of Israeli conspiracy theory.
He's like, no, I'm spelling it right.
These Jews are going to get you.
She's trying to make me spell it incorrectly.
What's going on?
She posted, she posted this.
Snatch.
Oh, wait, wait, wait.
Someone else posted it.
And she enhanced it.
Yeah, I posted this.
She posted this word.
Yeah, she gets it.
And then they keep making it crazier.
It gets worse.
Wait, it gets better.
We got JD Vance, fat guy.
Nick Rogue.
Nick Rogue is a soon.
Like, anything looks like a horrific monster.
You zoom in enough.
Dude, Jewish ice cream cone with an Israeli flag.
It's so funny.
I love it.
Anyway.
I had a funny sketch idea.
Let me see if it'll translate.
Delaware Husker says, sorry I can't watch.
It's if Ian's language doesn't change.
My grandsons watch this with me.
They look forward to seeing it.
Please turn him off.
If not, don't have him on anymore.
You'd rather be talking about Epstein's client list for you.
No, stop swearing.
I mean, you'd rather hear about the dirty things that Epstein did to young girls with your little kids sitting there.
I know it's a weird sounding word, the F-word, but come on.
No, I'm going to side with Julius and say, stop swearing.
You literally yesterday.
You were literally saying the opposite yesterday.
Yeah, yeah.
Like, I want to use better words, like more creative words.
I thought I was pretty good tonight.
I think eight-year-olds have like a good grasp on these international pedophile communities.
I thought he was fine.
I wasn't here for the first 20 minutes, but someone said Ian was swearing.
I didn't.
Wasn't he said bullshit early?
Well, he just did it again.
It's like exposing the pedophile.
We just lost an eight-year-old viewer.
Thanks a lot.
To all you eight-year-olds out there, I apologize.
You're going to have to.
That kid in 10 years will be voting.
And that's 2036 midterms, and you're going to regret losing that kid.
Yep, the truth is going to be one.
He's going to be a full-blown libtard.
It's all your fault.
I actually appreciate it.
To be fair, in 10 years, the Republican Party will be gay communists, and the Democrats will just be AI.
People like you.
The Democrats are the real homophobes.
Thanks to your dad for the first time.
Well, because the Republicans always, everyone moves left, even the Republican Party.
The joke is 10 years from now, the Republican Party is the gay communists fighting back, the traditional conservative gay communists fighting back against the synthetic humanoid.
You should be in CPAC and be like, you know, the Democrats are the real transphobes.
Well, I'm really interested about what we're going to do for what Candace refers to as Sentinel Americans.
Yeah, North Sentinel Islands.
What?
No, not North Sentinel Islands.
No, she's referring to the robot people.
Yeah, she said Elon.
They call him Dutch.
The robots.
And she said if she stabbed them, she's not sure they would bleed.
What?
She calls them Sentinel Americans.
To be fair, she calls them Sentinels, but I think Sentinel is.
I'm talking about that's the Marvel Comics thing, these big robot creatures called Sentinels that they have.
No, she thinks it's real life.
She thinks Charlie's a time traveler.
I heard that today.
I just read it.
I didn't watch the video.
Has it been a community note yet?
She's wild, dude.
I want to do a movie.
I'm thinking about why Charlie told me he was a time traveler.
I showed you this.
Is that just something that people say to you?
And then she said the agents stopped him because they were trying to prevent an outcome.
Well, I don't think he's.
She's literally saying she thinks he's a time traveler and he was killed because they're trying to change the future.
That was a ridiculous tweet and made some remark.
And there were a lot of people that called me a Jew for saying that.
I think she's a troll.
Like you're a troll.
I shouldn't have said that.
What she doesn't understand is that the Jews are from the future and they came back in time.
And everything we know is actually just a time loop.
What's the paradox called when you're your own grandfather?
That's hot.
I think that's being Pakistani.
Wait, is that a, is that a, is that a, what, I don't know.
Is there an actual term?
There's a.
There's a name for it where it's a paradox where.
So it's like the theory is you're standing on the beach and all of a sudden a book falls and hits you in the head.
And you pick the book up and you're like, where did this book come from?
It just says grandfather paradox when I go.
It could be, but here's, so the idea is this.
You're standing on the beach, all of a sudden a book hits you in the head.
You pick the book up and you go, where did this book come from?
You get angry and you chuck the book.
It flies in the air and then goes through a rip in this time space continuum and is gone.
You're like, weird.
And then it goes back in time and falls and hits you in the head.
So the book never has a point of origin.
There's a name for this.
I forgot what it's called.
It could just be the grandfather paradox.
I want to make a movie about that where like the central character is the item that's being traveled through time and like other people will pick it up and you'll see how it affects different time periods and places.
Like it doesn't actually get to do anything other than travel in that loop where it falls, hits the head, picks up the body.
Isn't there a movie that goes through the whole falls, hit the head?
It doesn't experience other people.
The movie's already been made.
Looper's more about the guy.
It's not about the object he's carrying, although he does.
No, but he ends up getting shot by himself.
Yeah.
Truth.
Yeah, yeah.
That movie's pretty crazy.
I believe that is true.
That is true.
That movie is wild.
It's called the bootstrap paradox, where an item has no original source.
An object is sent back in time, then the person takes the object and then later on sends it back in time.
Or it could be a song like someone hears a song from the future and then in the future plays the song.
Oh, yeah, I wonder about that.
Like, if I could go back in time and write the Beatles music, if I could, and I'm like, maybe I'm just hearing music from the future anyway, and I'm the guy that went back in time to hear the future music.
But Ian Crossland gets to write it in the yesterday.
Or, like in Bioshock Infinite, you open a rip in time in the time space continuum and listen to songs from other dimensions and then record them and release them in your own dimension.
It's like doing DMT, bro.
One word: Tenant.
Ripping holes in other dimensions to hear the music from other dimensions.
Have you not played Bioshock Infinite?
I have not.
Man, that's Tenet, you said?
Is that the movie?
You know what the most disappointing thing about Bioshock Infinite was?
They got rid of the injections and you drink a soda.
Like, are you kidding me, dude?
Yeah, in Bioshock, it's a masterpiece.
It is a masterpiece.
If you've not played Bioshock, it will forever be one of the greatest video games or pieces of media ever created.
And they should definitely make a movie based on Bioshock, but it's got to be true to the game.
So, anyway, you go to Rapture and it's just decimated, and they're splicer monsters.
And then you can find, what are they called?
Chat knows what they're called.
The stuff you find and inject yourself with that gives you powers.
Plasmids.
There you go.
Plasmids.
And when they made Bioshock Infinite, they were like, I don't know if families want their kids going into their arm.
So they made it soda bottles and you crack them open.
Oh, get out of here.
It would be destroyed by the stomach acid.
It wouldn't work.
Way cooler than that.
You would at least need a permanent tube that's in your arm that you could like pour the thing into the backpack so it goes into the tube properly.
They could have at least made an injection, but like in your, like, you know, those movies where, or like Star Trek, it looks like a gun, but you just press the neck and then go, it makes it.
Yes.
Yeah.
They could have done that.
He could have gone taking it and going like, activating near-infrared to target the location.
Bioshock, dude.
I almost want to play it again.
And it's funny because it's been so long.
The graph, the vision of the graphics, like the memory of the graphics, and I'm going to turn it on and go, these are the worst graphics I've ever seen.
I fired up Battlefront 2 the other day.
I was like, what?
How did I pay attention?
Yeah.
That's Star Wars?
Yeah.
And I would grind on there.
I was like five, and then I played it again.
But you mean Battlefield 2 or Battlefield 2 2?
Star Wars Battlefront.
Oh, Battlefront 2.
Star Wars Battlefront 2.
Battlefront 2 or Battlefront 2 2.
Right, because they did it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Very confusing.
There's two Battlefront 2s.
The whole Star Wars universe has been upended.
It's very unfortunate.
Was the second one any good?
I know we have more.
Star Wars Battlefront 2 was good.
Star Wars Battlefront 2-2, not so good.
Yeah, like back in the 2000s, I'm hanging out with my boy Brandon.
What up?
And we just played Battlefront 2 all day.
Amazing.
Was it PayPal?
You're like, I'm Darth Vader.
There was no strat.
You would just hold the trigger down.
Like, cause there's no anti-you know, the reload.
It was fantastic.
Oh, big flaw.
Or boom.
I loved it.
When you're five, it's awesome.
You feel great about your father.
I want to hear about what people think.
Here we go.
We got Tech Nick.
What did it say?
I don't know.
Tech says, I wake up halfway through the show to Ian spouting off like a hallucinating AI.
I haven't had enough coffee for this.
Oh, man.
I had a bunch of coffee before the show for you.
Yeah, I was, dude.
I was channeling the night.
You were a big dog.
You good?
Maybe he's in Australia.
He might be Australian.
Nippon says Tim's AI dooming is nonsense.
Incorrect.
Incorrect.
Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's nonsense.
Dude, that stuff is happening in AI that people don't know about.
Because I've got sources.
I got sources.
And they've told me things about AI.
But I know the power thing is where it gets tweaked because the iron lattice system where you put the processor and the memory in one area so you no longer have computer bussing.
You get 10 million times faster processing with a million times less electricity requirement.
That's like coming around the bend.
These AI centers, the graphics cards, I don't know if they're going to become defunct, but you're going to get magnitudes more processing power.
I mean, you'll still have these giant data centers, but you'll be able to put, you know, I don't know how many more times processing in there, like 10 million times more processing power in these things.
It's going to be, but that's in the beginning, it's just going to be big warehouses that are then completely left.
They're going to leave them and they're going to be defunct, but they're going to be there for about 15 years or 20 years.
We're going to go to the uncensored portion of the show, my friends.
So smash the like button, share the show with everyone you have ever met in your life.
Do it right now.
You have to do it.
You can follow me on X and Instagram at Timcast.
Make sure you go to rumble.com/slash Timcast IRL.
Devori, do you want to shout anything out?
Yeah, follow me, guys, on X, YouTube, and Rumble.
Devori Darkens, the only person in the world with that name.
I love it.
And it's your actual name.
That's like a superhero name.
Wow.
Kind of.
No, but it is.
It's alliterative and unique.
It's like what a comic book writer writes down.
Like, I need a name for a hero.
And, like, Donnie Darko, you know, they might have changed the last name to Darkness because that's what they used to call me in the military.
No, Darkness.
Let's go.
So I'm fired, dude.
Hey, at Ian Crossland, you can follow me on the internet and check out graphene.movie.
I've been talking about it.
The trailers online.
I went down to Rice University with Andreas Exerdis and 6'7 Kevin, and we had a wonderful time with nano scientists, Jim Tour, and the nano facilities down there.
Grapene.movie.
Check out the trailer, sign up for the email list.
So when the documentary goes live, you'll get first dibs, man.
I'm looking forward to you seeing it.
Let me know what you think and follow me at Ian Crossland.
Tate Brown.
What is going on?
Yeah, X and Instagram at RealTate Brown.
Come give me a follow and be on the lookout.
Across the Pond is back for 2026.
So be on the lookout on the Culture War channel this weekend.
We'll have some episodes going up.
And Devori, I'll see you on the Rumble lineup on Monday.
Absolutely.
I am Phil that Remains on Twix.
The band is all that remains.
We're going on tour this spring with Born of Osiris and Dead Eyes.
We're going to start out in Albany on the 29th of April, be gone for about three weeks.
You can check out all the remains of the band on Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, Spotify, YouTube, and Deezer.
Don't forget the left lane is for crime.
We will see you all at rumble.com/slash Timcast IRL in about 30 seconds.
Thanks for hanging out.
No, you're not.
You're Ian's too nice.
Ian's way too nice.
What's going on, everybody?
Welcome to the Rumble After Show.
Okay, I don't think I'm too nice.
I said that Candace, like how Tim is a troll on Twitter, exactly how Candace is.
She's loving.
She's like, get it digging.
I mean, she likes the attention, but she's not trolling.
Oh, she trolls so hard.
No, she's not trolling.
We got this video here from the internet, and we're going to play it for you guys.
And this is why we're talking about Candace Owens.
They're gone.
It's all connected.
We need to figure out how before it's too late.
One second, sorry.
Please note the star of David here, of course, because it is the Jews.
It's all connected.
We need to figure out how before it's too late.
We got to do a show with Cameron.
They're kind.
Where she and I are like X-Files, but me and Candace look for aliens.
Like an alien, like the X-Files.
Not like we're actually looking for aliens, but like a lot of chances of her saying, yeah, she's going to do that.
If she comes over here, she's available.
I think we've had a better chance of getting Aaron Wexler to do that.
Wexler would do it.
Yeah.
Candace is awesome, though.
We get along greatly.
I haven't seen her in a couple of years, but we always get along really good.
I think she is an entertainer at heart and a phenomenally quizzical, funny person, but just she's wrapped into politics because it's so important.
And it's sort of like Thomas Jefferson.
That's why I said he's too nice.
He's giving her the benefit of the doubt.
I want to take her away on that.
I think she's a crazy person and she is adult.
I think she's adult.
I think she's a slack-jawed derelict.
I think she's a buffoon.
I think, in layman's terms, she's an idiot.
Think that she'll say, say anything to retain the audience.
She's a grifter.
I think she's after the audience.
She, she makes the retard right look bad and the retard right does that to themselves already.
The candle bearer of the, she's the torch bearer right now.
What's that?
She's the?
She's like the torch bearer of the retard right now yeah, and she, it's the torch has a mirror behind it.
So the, the retards, are like, oh, they're seeing themselves in the in the reflection I put.
I think she knows this whole thing.
Sorry to interrupt phil there.
I just really believe she's like fucking getting off and tricking all these people and making these people crazy and being too kind.
She's loving it.
You're being wait oh, she's like, are you not describing like a narcissist?
Well, I mean it's, it's, it's it's trolling.
I i've seen it in misleading and and in many ways destroying people's life purely out of self-interest.
Yeah, that would be like definition of a narcissist.
I mean part maybe, if you think destroying people.
I don't think she's really destroying anybody's life, but absolutely people are making like bets on the stock market and these sorts of things based off of these doomsday scenarios that she's describing.
I mean, if you really want to undermine public faith in the Trump administration or you know conservative uh, institutions to the degree that she had, then yeah, you're going to be very um, schizophrenic to say the least.
So you think she put doubt on the Trump administration's ability to handle the Charlie Kirk murder uh, and that has risked and maybe cost people life or livelihood.
If you look at you know who's connected to who.
She's basically said that the Trump administration would have been at least complicit in in Charlie's murder because they would have had foreknowledge.
I mean, if Turning Point's involved, Turning Point in many ways is just an apparatus of the Trump administration that would make her uh, she or she would be suggesting that you know that connection, that admin connections within Turning Point.
They would be connected to the I mean the FBI is covering it up um, all these various three-letter agencies.
I guess trolling, Trolling about, I mean, I don't know, trolling about an FBI investigation.
She's like, I mean, it's all, I think that there's probably some substance to the Candace is a, she has unrequited, had unrequited, requited, is the right word, yeah, unrequited love from for Charlie.
Like, she loved Charlie and Charlie didn't love her back, and then afterwards, she's just like, okay, I want all the attention about Charlie.