Get 50% off Webroot Total Protection or Webroot Essentials when you go to http://webroot.com/pool
Text TIM to 36912 to get 60% off the BAERSkin Hoodie today! Or click: https://baer.skin/tim
SUPPORT THE SHOW BUY CAST BREW COFFEE NOW - https://castbrew.com/
Join - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCLwNTXWEjVd2qIHLcXxQWxA/joinShow more Hosts:
Tim @Timcast (everywhere)
Phil @PhilThatRemains (X)
Tate @realTateBrown (everywhere)
Ian @IanCrossland (everywhere)
Producer:
Serge @SergeDotCom (everywhere)
Guest:
DeVory Darkins @devorydarkins (X)
Podcast available on all podcast platforms!
Anti-ICE Extremists LOOT DHS Vehicles, Steal Weapons, Trump Warns INSURRECTION | Timcast IRL Show less
So good to see Devori because usually I'm seeing the beginning of your stream because a lot of people in the audience, if you're watching the noon live, this is kind of weird.
This is kind of like a Marvel crossover.
If you're like a soy-out millennial, you love the Marvel crossovers.
You're getting really hype right now seeing this crossover.
So I'm usually throwing it to Devorah.
So, Devori, I want to apologize for sending so many like schizophrenic people into your chat.
Tate, I just noticed that, like, when you do the Tate Brown holding it down, my kid does the same thing, like, whenever I bump his crib, he does this thing.
So smash the like button, share the show with your friends.
We're going to jump right into it from the Dallas Express.
Video captures Minneapolis rioters looting DHS vehicles, exposing agent info online.
Agitators in Minneapolis continue to wreak havoc now, allegedly breaking into multiple ICE vehicles late Wednesday night, stealing guns, ammunition, and sensitive government documents, including arrest warrants and personal information on federal agents.
The crimes captured on video and in live streams circulating across social media spotlight the continued destruction from violent rioters against federal law enforcement agents, specifically through the Twin Cities.
Video clips posted by Nick Sortor from the scene show groups of agitators vandalizing unmarked cars allegedly belonging to immigration and customs enforcement officials, the Department of Homeland Security, and even possibly the FBI.
In one act, rioters attached a toe rope to a weapons locker, excuse me, in the trunk of the federal car and used a pickup truck to rip it open, stealing a rifle and ammunition.
There are a lot of leftists that have gone to private in their ex-accounts after this happened.
Tate, I'm interested in hearing what your take on this is.
Do you think that this is justification for the Insurrection Act?
Yeah, I mean, Viva Fry was on the show today on the Noon Live, and he made an interesting point, which was, you know, he is obviously also saying, like, yeah, this is the ground, this is grounds for the Insurrection Act.
There could be an argument that the left may be goading that sort of reaction out of the Trump administration so then they can say, oh, look how authoritarian it is.
This sort of justifies this.
Maybe this would swing over some weak Republicans into some sort of resolution to maybe try and strip away Insurrection Act powers from the GOP.
But the point he made and the point that I was making, and we're both in agreement, is like, yeah, but this is the grounds for it.
So I don't really care what the reaction is going to be.
Let's just do it.
Let's rip the bandit.
Because like the stuff we're seeing here, like where they're literally like roping around the case and yanking out of the truck and that sort of stuff.
We didn't even see that kind of stuff in 2020.
Like that is next level, literally raiding an ICE vehicle.
Like that's a very unique thing where they're stealing weapons.
There was actually a dude that there was actually a dude in, I believe it was in Seattle that grabbed a rifle from a police car, police officer car and a security guy who actually like grabbed the rifle from him.
He actually made a YouTube page for himself and called him the weapon snatcher.
But I do think to your point, it doesn't really matter what the left says.
It's time for the government to, you know, for the federal government to move in and make sure that the ICE officials and the DHS officials can do their job.
The DOJ is apparently, according to reporting, sniffing around Tim Waltz right now.
So there's also a chance he received a tip, received a note got slid across his desk.
And he said, oh, oh, okay.
Yeah.
Okay.
Maybe guys stand down a little bit.
Because literally yesterday, to your point, he went out on national television and said something along the lines of I'm paraphrasing a bit, but he said this part directly.
He said, ICE agents are taking away your neighbors of color.
So he's basically like portraying these ICE agents as if they're some sort of Gestapo.
And to be honest with you, I mean, this is something we talked about a little bit, but I think that it probably spans the whole Democrat Party.
I mean, you've got essentially the entire left side of the aisle, whether you're a far leftist or someone that would be considered, you know, fairly moderately left, if there are any of those in the Congress anymore, but they're all covering for illegal immigrants, right?
They're all essentially they're trying to, you know, trying to convince people that illegal immigrants equals people of color, which is not true at all.
There are plenty of illegal immigrants from white countries.
There are illegal immigrants from Europe, and it doesn't matter.
It's not about color at all.
But they're trying to make it out like that.
And when it comes to all the fraud and stuff that you hear, there's a lot of the Democrat politicians that are doing their best to either cover it up.
And I think it's because they're trying to cover up their own involvement or at least the fact that they haven't used the powers of government to stop it or prevent it.
And I think there are some that actually are participating in it.
If Tim Waltz hadn't said stand down, I would really lean towards that as well.
But because of it, I'd like to see what if people actually stand down because someone mentioned earlier, I think you may have mentioned, Devori, that they could be baiting them.
I mean, a big part of the revolution of the point.
The Marxist, yeah, communist thing is they want the federal government to crack down with a fascist dictatorship so that they can be like, see, we told you, community rally, commune, communism.
And it's like, come on, dude, just don't take the bait.
To use the reaction, the reaction of your opponent is the actual target.
That's what they're looking to do.
That's why they have guys out there dressed up like Pikachu, or that's why they have women with kids out there.
They have women out in the front of the line because what they want is they want to get a picture of you beating up of the police beating up a woman or beating up a dude that's dressed up like Pikachu or whatever, because then it makes the government look like they're overreacting and makes them look ridiculous.
Well, and the conservative right-wing argument against invoking the Insurrection Act as it stands right now is the Insurrection Act completely federalizes every sort of form of riot control in the state of Minnesota as soon as you invoke it.
The right-wing conservative argument is, look, if we can just simply bend these blue state governors' arms with just the three-letter agencies, that sets the tone much more than the Insurrection Act.
Because the Insurrection Act, obviously, that's going to sort of disarm them, incapacitate them.
But again, if you can manage to twist the arm of Tim Waltz, which we saw today with just using the three-letter agencies, there's something to be said about that actually might send even more of a message to these left-wing governors going forward.
That's the debate raging on Ryan.
Because, you know, it's really in vogue right now, obviously, to say, well, Insurrection Act, let's just mop this up.
But I don't think the, and I'm not saying anybody's making this argument, but I don't think the Trump administration are idiots.
I think Stephen Miller is actually keenly aware that, hey, if we can manage to just basically set up a trap right here without having to invoke the Insurrection Act, that's going to be much more politically expedient going forward than every single time there's a riot, every single time there's a protest, let's just chuck the Insurrection Act and get it over with.
And I mean, to your point, like it does also leave the Insurrection Act as a card you can play, right?
If you don't have to go full on federalizing everything and you can get the local governments to do what you want just by applying pressure, then you can save the Insurrection Act for if they don't respond or what have you.
You're seeing reporting that Bondi is just not on the same page with the Trump admin broadly.
But yeah, I mean, that argument doesn't make sense because something like us conservatives is we want nothing more, including myself.
We want nothing more than to see Marines on the streets because I think as a collective, we are a bit, you know, this is like a gay word to use, but we're a bit traumatized from 2020.
Like that was actually such an egregious, embarrassing moment as a country that we just are paranoid of seeing that ever happen again, me included.
So we just want to see the Marines go in just to send a message, just to get a bit of sort of vindication in a lot of ways.
But then that's where the debate is.
Okay, what's more politically expedient for the next three years?
I think that that's one of the reasons or one of the best arguments for Donald Trump actually using the Insurrection Act is to make sure that 2020 is not repeated.
But there's a lot of people that are like, I don't want to see that again.
I don't want to see cities being burnt.
I don't want to see people out rioting like this, et cetera, et cetera.
There's a lot of people that look at Donald Trump and think, well, he's not actually as strong as he talks.
And it would take that kind of, you know, that kind of order from the administration to get people to be like, oh, well, I guess maybe he does have a new.
Because even I think, you know, I'm like, I'm not sure Donald Trump has it in him to do the stuff that's necessary to really put this stuff down.
And I hope he does, if it's necessary, but I'm not 100% sure.
It seems like with things in Iran, like heat being hot like they are in Venezuela, Trump doesn't have room to mess around domestically.
So if there's a threat of one of our cities going under right now, now is not the time to mess with the federal security force because we need diplomatic unity at home in order to preserve against international forces.
A lot of countries will bullshit you and use that reasoning and be like, we must come together to fight the, but this is legit potential explosive threats that we can't tender a domestic pop.
Well, yeah, you're describing like a very real political mechanism, which is every president, every politician has a limited amount of political capital that they can spend.
And that's what you need to look at at you need to look at Trump's victories bank you political power that you can then spend in other places, potentially like we did in the last time, potentially on issues that are unpopular.
And there are some issues that like, you know, Trump loyalists want to push across the finish line that are unpopular with the majority of Americans.
So that's where you spend that political capital.
So the question is, if we're really expending political capital on Iran, you still need some leftover to then quash these sorts of things in Minneapolis and these sorts of things.
Now, I don't want to say at the highest levels, Democrat politicians want to foment civil war, as I often talk about, but they're beholden to their constituents.
So we have a mayor suggesting the police should now be fighting federal agents, which is horrifying.
But it's actually quite simple.
ICE agents are out on the ground across the country because I asked them to be, because you asked them to be, because the American voter said immigration is a top issue for us.
We want Republicans in office.
We want Donald Trump in office.
And we want this problem solved once and for all.
So what are we seeing?
Violent extremists who oppose our democracy and the will of the people.
That video you showed where they put the toe rope and rip out the weapons locker.
That's not the only one.
There were other vehicles they ransacked.
There's a video purported to show a man stealing what appears to be a rifle from a federal vehicle and ammunition, as well as patches, tourniquets, and other objects.
This is not a protest.
This is not a riot.
These are political extremists, and it's overt terror.
I'll tell you what it upgrades to terror when these people are reading the names of the agents on camera, which they did after they ransacked the vehicle, after they leaked their names, and apparently went and found their private vehicles.
And Jesse, I used to go on the ground all the time.
I've covered tons of these protests.
I've been personally attacked and assaulted by many of these extremists.
I have never seen this level of extremism.
I mean, we've seen firebombs, we've seen broken windows, but to ransack federal vehicles and steal their weapons.
So let me say this about what happened to Renee Goode.
You may have seen the video immediately following the moment where she dies.
And it's tragic.
I wish she didn't.
I wish it didn't happen.
But you hear her lover say, why were you using real bullets?
There's two different people here.
There's two different groups.
You've got your political extremists, and they radicalize your liberal ICE mom, your run-of-the-mill suburban mom who doesn't really understand what they're being asked to do.
And these women, they've gone out to your protest where they wiggled their little flags and their signs and they said, this policy is bad and that policy is bad.
This is something different.
The extremists are advocating that these middle-aged women show up to federal law enforcement operations where armed federal agents are seeking out criminal cartels, murderers, rapists, child traffickers.
And they're wondering why these ICE agents are apprehensive and armed with lethal munitions.
They're not prepared for this, and I fear it will get worse.
You know, just to, I don't want to call it a non-sequitur, but the Greenland thing, I think, really exemplifies the no matter what Trump does, he is wrong.
And that's really what it is.
The Democratic politicians are going to say ICE is wrong to enforce the law.
They're wrong to stop these narco-gangs, these rapists, these criminals, and general illegal immigrants.
And when you see how Trump is simply negotiating for Greenland and they tell him he's wrong on that one too, I throw my hands up.
We voted for immigration operations, and your point is astute.
In areas where there's agreements and they cooperate, it's clean, safe, and the job is done.
But in these particular areas, what do we get?
A judge aiding and abetting a man who beat his wife to helping him escape and getting convicted for it.
No, I mean, the country cannot function if you have little carve-outs of chaos in major cities and states where agents can't go in and enforce federal law.
I mean, that's when the country collapses, and hopefully it doesn't come to that.
if you're looking to actually have a policy that was voted on by the American people that was that is very popular.
I mean, when Trump was elected, it was something like 75% of Americans said, yeah, we want to get rid of illegal legal things.
Now, granted, as the policy is implemented and it gets kinetic, then people get a little, you know, they get a little weak in the knees and stuff like that.
And I understand that's going to happen.
But when it comes to the actual idea of getting people that are here legally out, that's incredibly popular.
And I don't think that, and considering the fact that it can be done peacefully, like Jesse was saying, you know, Memphis, it's, you know, there's, you're not getting people riding.
You're not getting all of this stuff because you don't have politicians egging them on.
I do blame the Democrats in office for the vast majority of this of this, the violence and chaos that we see.
And it's not necessary.
It could be a policy that just, you know, that is done smoothly and cleanly.
You say it's like it can be peaceful, like in Nashville, for instance, but for them, it's like taking your enemy's food supply is like, they call it non-violent.
The CIA describes it as non-violent because there's no kinetic action.
But we all know that taking a community's food supply would be considered violent in the scheme of things.
So removing people that live there that might be there illegally, but have become part of the community emotionally, they see it as like removing the food supply.
So they, it's not really vi, you know, it's kind of how you that's right, Ian.
We were talking, Jesse at the end there said that chaos is not tolerable.
I thought that, you know, bouts of chaos is kind of what makes America great, being able to resist the overlord, the Fed, whatever.
Not that this is necessarily the debate on whether this is right or wrong is almost like tertiary to the debate, just the understanding that it's local government supersedes.
I've always made this point, like in regards with European cities.
Okay, as right-wingers, as conservatives, like we inherently believe in hierarchy, we inherently believe in order.
We believe these things are ordained by God.
But when like in Europe, for example, where there's zero sense of like an underworld whatsoever, these cities actually just turn into museums and it like completely eviscerates any sort of life that's in these cities.
So I actually steel man Ian's argument here because if you look at like Prague or Budapest, like these cities for young people are actually quite miserable.
These are very old cities.
So I do agree that to a degree, you obviously can't endorse it as the government.
You can't promote it.
But just a bit of room for things actually goes a long way for young people because that's what creates innovation, that creates culture and these sorts of things.
It just can't come at the sacrifice of order, which is exactly what's taking place.
And the other thing, too, is we're dealing with people who don't even support the idea that someone who's been in the country unlawfully for 30 years should not be deported.
It's like they're emphasizing disorder in the most pernicious ways, whether it's in sexuality, whether it's in civilizational questions like immigration, what does it mean to be an American?
How about just going back to the whole people of color thing?
Just if you think of economics and our financial freedom, as people like to say, how could that even be a reality if they keep funding illegal immigration?
I don't understand that.
So these people, they're going into the streets, they're protesting, saying that things are too expensive, you know, all this other stuff.
Well, what do you think's happened with all of your resources?
And then when we say this, like, hey, maybe you can't afford houses because the market is oversaturated with people who are needing houses.
And in order, see, they don't understand supply and demand because they're communists.
So it's like, money, let me just, if there's any communists out there who are concerned about why there are homeless people, let's start with when there's too many people and not enough homes, the people who own the homes get to dictate the prices.
And they say, listen, I got people banging my door down saying they'll take my house.
I'm going to take the best offer.
When you have no people and there's a bunch of empty houses, they're going to sell them for what they can sell them for.
So when you keep inviting in more and more and more people, your prices, they're going to go up.
Not to mention the very simple reality of at a certain point, people walking on the ground break the ground and then we have to fix it.
Supply and demand functions, but that's not a closed system.
Outside the people that can't participate in that supply and demand system, which is like house buying, they're so poor, they become highway robbers.
They do things to that system of the supply and demand system.
So people that are here completely unable to think about housing, they will put pressure on that supply-demand trade system with whatever, you know, riots in the streets, but like it could be lots of different ways.
The point was additionally just roads don't last forever, buildings don't last forever, maintenance is a requirement for all of our infrastructure.
And if you're inviting in more and more people to tunes of tens of millions, eventually a bridge collapses.
And we have to fix it.
So over time, a bridge is going to face just general environmental wear and tear and degradation.
And you got to fix it.
But you add millions of people walking back and forth across it.
It breaks down faster.
That's going to cost everybody money.
And that's going to come from the public coffers.
But these communists, you know, the best example of how insane these socialists and communists are is that meme where it was like, someone said, what are you going to do when communism wins?
And they said, I'm going to teach art and poetry on my farm.
To which someone responded, your farm?
But while that is a funny joke, it also exemplifies what they think will happen.
They think that communism will come in and then they don't have to work ever again.
Modern communists love to say things like fully automated luxury communism because they believe that like with super productivity that's going to come with AI and with robotics, that everybody will have everything they want.
Look, if that is the future, like where you can actually be super productive and there's nobody, you know, anything you want, you can have, which I don't think is actually going to happen.
I think we need a new word to describe this because communist, it's like you can say neo-communist because it is a different function.
It's different to the general ideology we knew in the early 1900s.
Largely because you're looking at an industrializing society and they're approaching this concept of labor from a, we can do a lot more work, but we still work.
Now you're looking at the AI revolution and there's going to be people who cannot work.
Of course, many of these people are not advocating for UBI, which that won't work either.
Even David Sachs said this and he's the AI czar.
He's like, no, UBI is not going to happen.
So I'll just say this.
You know, every day I track what's going on with AI developments.
And it is, the development is so massively exponential.
This show probably won't exist, won't be able to exist.
One thing that we're seeing right now, and you're wondering why, let me tell you why first, already, already, right now, if I wanted to, I could take probably 50 episodes of Timcast IRL, load it into an AI, and tell it, isolate Tim Pool and clone him.
I'm literally, right now you can do this.
It'll probably take you half a day to upload all the videos and then it'll take maybe a day to render the clone.
It takes about an hour or two.
And then you can tell ChatGPT, write a script in the style of Tim Pool about today's news, and it'll do it.
And you don't need me anymore.
It'll just, it'll do it.
The only real problem is that all the AI is woke.
So they're going to tell fake news, but they'll just do it in my voice.
It'll be creepy.
Here's what's happening right now on YouTube.
There are hundreds, if not thousands, of channels.
This is crazy.
I'm going to tell you guys how to become millionaires right now.
Get your bag before it's too late.
No joke, no joke.
What they'll do is they'll write a script that automatically will plug into ChatGPT and say, write a 30-minute long script based on today's news.
Start with the punchiest sensational story.
Then it'll load that script into an AI avatar video generator and it will tell the AI, have a person, an attractive male or female, read this script over the period of a half an hour.
And what they do is they upload 70 to 100 of these videos per day.
Seriously, psychotic amounts of videos.
And they get 500 to 800 views.
And you might be saying, well, what's that going to get you?
Well, when you do 100 of them, you're making 150K per month.
And here's the thing: people won't come back to watch those videos, but it won't matter because the videos change.
The style changes.
And it's going to eventually get recommended to somebody.
And they're going to click it.
And if a couple hundred click your couple hundred videos per day, you are making banks.
There are already guys that have gaming content and viral videos on Instagram where you'll see a woman with like a low-cut top, and it's actually a guy records a video and then renders it as a woman to upload it.
It's kind of those things like in 2020, you know, everyone was like, well, if that cashier would have just taken the fake $20 bill, then none of this would have ever happened.
It's kind of the same thing.
It's like, if they would have just spelled learning correctly, none of this would have happened.
Like, this is what everyone, like, the initial thing that started the, let's just say the Renee Good, if she just ran over that officer, they would be celebrating.
These are the same people that celebrated Charlie Kirk's death.
So it's like, they would be celebrating this.
The only way you get these people to stop, the only way you like end this, again, is just sending a message to Minneapolis.
Like it's very simple.
There's no negotiating with these people.
There's no debating.
There's no like, maybe if we sweeten the deal or maybe make him a different offer.
Tim Waltz is just trying to get Trump to back down with ICE because he is not going to be his victory condition is ICE completely withdrawing from the city in an entirety.
We can't do that.
There's been a mandate given to the Trump administration.
Again, with Nick Shirley's video, now it's on everyone's desks.
They woke up and everyone saw the video, left, right, center, whatever.
The Trump administration is not going to back down.
That's part of the reason that Tim Waltz actually dropped out of the race is to at least give him sort of, he doesn't have to worry about re-election now.
He can literally do whatever he wants because he has this.
You have to remember, Tim Waltz got beat by Trump in an election.
He lost out on the vice presidency.
This dude has a chip on his shoulder like no other.
That's part of the reason he dropped out is because he wants to try and settle this score with the Trump administration.
He knows if he doesn't have to worry about re-election, he can pull whatever he wants.
Tim, we should just, we should give these zombies pocketbook constitutions.
I think what it is is they're not, they're not, they're not, they haven't been, you know, properly matriculated into the glory of free market economics and like classical liberalism.
That's what they need, is they should be steeped in the literature and then they'll just change it.
Well, I do think it's fair to say that The way that the left has approached the Charlie Kirk thing is that the higher profile individuals at the highest level, the Democrats, said it's sad.
Our prayers are with the family.
Then the mid-tier people said, Yeah, well, he was a bad guy, and this is what happens.
And then the lower-tier, you know, leftist extremists all dance and celebrate it.
We do see something comparable with the killing of Renee Good.
I see it all over Instagram, sort of no-name accounts making memes, mocking her, dying, laughing about it, insulting her.
Then you get the mid-tier personalities like us saying, well, she accelerated towards an officer.
I mean, it's sad that she died.
And at the highest level, you have politicians saying, we're very sad this happened.
Trump even saying, I understand there's two ways you can see it.
Now, the difference is not factual, factually correct or factually incorrect.
The difference is moral worldview.
So for us, we're like, she was engaged in felony obstruction.
And this is a law enforcement operation, not crowd control work.
This is where the conflict arises.
Charlie Kirk was speaking.
That's it.
So you can't compare the two.
Well, in their worldview, their moral structure is you're allowed to obstruct law enforcement because it's for the greater good of what we determine.
And Charlie Kirk was spreading hate.
Now, we, of course, look at that and go, that's insane.
We can't agree with that, but it's the light and it's the dark, right?
They live in their moral worldview, which we think is psychotic, and we live in ours.
New Year's Eve, he's a black guy, lives in an apartment complex with an ICE agent.
He goes outside to celebrate, shoots his rifle in the air.
Bullets in the air.
The ICE agent comes out, confronts him, says, hey, I'm an ICE agent.
Stop doing that.
I guess he didn't comply.
And then, according to LAPD, and I say that carefully, according to LAPD, not my opinion, they say that he shot at the ICE agent three times and then the ICE agent shot him and killed him in self-defense.
What I can tell you for certain is that this is not sustainable.
This is an impossible situation that our city is presently being put in.
And at the same time, we are trying to find a way forward to keep people safe, to protect our neighbors, to maintain order.
And we're in a position right now where we have residents that are asking the very limited number of police officers that we have to fight ICE agents on the street, to stand by their neighbors.
We cannot be at a place right now in America where we have two governmental entities that are literally fighting one another.
I think it's not going to bubble up like it has in the past, like slowly bleeding Kansas, 12 years of it without any kind of like really federal crackdown or intervention.
This is like, we see the problem pretty quick now.
If three years ago on this show, if three years ago on this show, I would have explained to you that we were facing the real risk of local law enforcement trying to fight the federal government and saying their cops should.
And then you'd have one of these leftists shot and killed by a federal agent.
But could you just imagine, I love the time travel test.
Going back 10 years and saying 10 years from now, Donald Trump will be in a second non-consecutive term where he will be deploying thousands of federal agents and the National Guard to various cities to arrest an estimated 10 to 20 million illegal immigrants.
In the process, he'll discover child slaves are being on drug farms.
People will get shot.
Agents will get shot at, rammed, dragged, assassinated.
There will be terror attacks with rifles shooting at ICE facilities.
Then in one incident, a middle-aged woman will obstruct federal law enforcement and in her attempt to escape, strike an officer who shoots and kills her.
Like, guys, we already know because we've done the time travel experiment 75 times or more on this show going back several years.
And every time we bring it up, the next step seems equally more absurd.
So I always preface it by saying maybe this will be the time where people say, whoa, we've gone way too far.
I said, Trump, after he wins, I said, if he wins, and then after he won, he is going to send out immigration enforcement and the Democrats, and I said, it's got to be done properly because the Democrats are going to take every photo and every video and claim it's the Nazis all over again and they're rounding up innocent people and they're killing innocent people and they're going to claim it's just like the Holocaust and what are we watching happen right now?
In the late 60s, word didn't travel the way the word travels now.
If you had a thousand bombings or 2,000 bombings in a year, like we did in the early 70s, like people would be off the chain because everybody would know about every one of them.
Whereas back in, you know, 40 years ago, 40, 50 years ago, 55 years ago now, like people just like there were tons of people that had no idea this stuff was going on.
They just didn't read the news.
They didn't watch ABCC, ABC, NBC, or CBS.
And they just went about their lives.
There was everybody was out touching grass.
So unless they were actively on like college campuses or watched the news really closely, they didn't really know.
If you did that, if that stuff happened today, like people would be out in the, I mean, I think that the internet would actually kind of compound the issues because there would be people out in the street being like, okay, it's on.
It's time, you know?
Because you would, I mean, dude, if you found out, right, tomorrow, or at the end of the week, you were like, you found out that there were 16 bombings in two days in the United States, we'd be like, okay, well, then civil war is actually here now.
Yeah, if it would be the thing is, with the internet, I don't think it will get to that because we're already talking about the Insurrection Act with one riot in Minneapolis.
In the 60s, it would have been Minneapolis.
10 more cities would have been erupting.
People would have been bombing the thing.
Now it's like one acute thing is such a big deal with the internet that even the federal government's like, okay, now we know what to nip in the bud.
I mean, I think that this is something that I've said.
I think that because the conservatives ostensibly control the government or at least control most of the executive branch, I think that if there's going to be some kind of kinetic action, it should be now because the Democrats shouldn't be in that position, like in that position.
The amount of bombs he dropped, seven American citizens killed under his watch because of drones, and the deportations, family, you know, children, kids, all this stuff.
And then the other thing this freaking mayor was saying about little to none police officers.
Well, why do you guys have a small police force?
Oh, yeah, that's right.
You defunded the police force in Minneapolis.
Yeah.
So, yeah, I think Obama got off scot-free, if you ask me.
I think a lot of this is being driven by the social media algorithms, of course.
It wants us enraged, angry, things like that.
But I'm with you.
I think this administration just needs to go all the way.
I think he's got to invoke the Insurrection Act for general immigration activities because we're seeing in numerous blue states, they're trying to create laws that obstruct, it's like Jersey just did this.
They passed this law.
The governor hasn't signed it yet.
That basically says they can't operate in our jails.
We can't cooperate with them.
And they put some restrictions on them.
Trump needs to just say, okay, this is active rebellion against the federal government.
The federal government is wholly responsible for immigration enforcement.
This is why when Texas was dealing with mass migration, they were not constitutionally allowed to turn people back.
So you have this double-edged sword where Texas says, we'll take care of it in our state.
And Biden's administration says, no, we won't let you.
Then when Trump gets elected, because people are like, we want the problem solved, the blue states say, we're not going to listen.
The only option then is, I'm going to say it again.
When the states under a Democrat administration say we want to deport the people coming into our states illegally, Biden says, no, you can't.
And they even cut the concertina wire to allow them to come in.
Trump gets in and tries to actually enforce this, and blue states are obstructing.
We voted for it, Trump Insurrection Act, send the National Guard and the feds in, start arresting these people.
I see these videos.
Saw the TikTok of the woman who lives in Minneapolis.
She's like, we love it.
We're so happy.
Okay.
I'm not going to listen to a bunch of white liberal women who feign offense on behalf of other people.
They don't really care.
They're lying.
I am protecting my community.
No, you're not.
You saw a meme and you made a dumb video and you're putting yourself at risk because you're dumb.
But if you're going to go, but the people why they were on that residential street ransacking the vehicles on the block?
It looked like they just went to an address they got and ransacked the vehicles.
They find, okay, you got to explain this one.
They find several parked vehicles, smash them all open, and find a bunch of weapon, two weapons, two weapons lockers patches.
It looks to me like, and I don't know this is true, with the doxing of these agents, they were going to private residences and just smashing up the vehicles they thought were feds.
Specifically in the past 10 years, they've been met with kid gloves.
What's happening now is they think every time they engage law enforcement, it's going to be a fun game of cat and mouse where the cops run and you run away and then you giggle and turn the corner and the cops stop.
Now what they're doing is they're going to federal facilities doing the same thing.
If at any point during one of these protests that turned into a riot, cop actually shot and killed a protester, this would not be happening.
I'm not saying they should have.
I'm saying if they didn't restrain themselves at a federal and a local cop, like during the George Floyd riots where 30 plus people were killed, if one cop just said, stop, no, don't kill that guy, bang, we wouldn't see this.
They fully believe.
Look, this one lady, she's not even wearing a mask.
I'm assuming it's a woman, not even wearing a mask or anything, going to be identified.
Look at her, giggling, wearing a kefir.
These people think it's a game, and then they're going to get 20 years and be like, I don't understand what's happening.
I thought they were just going to give me a slap on the wrist.
Renee Good showed up to federal law enforcement, which has a high density of lethal incidents.
These are feds showing up to arrest narco gangs, terrorists, human traffickers, and sometimes about 30% of them are just criminal aliens.
They are not going out to meet liberal women for crowd control measures.
These ICE agents are going out thinking when we go to this guy who's a known trendearagua, he might shoot me in the face and I may never see my family again.
These people go, I want to play too.
And they show up and the cops are like, I ain't playing no games.
Bang, she gets killed.
And they go, why did you have real bullets, you stupid mother?
Because they're tracking down terrorists and criminals.
Now these people outside a federal facility are trying to rip the fences down because they're playing a game.
They're playing cops and robbers.
Okay.
The only way this stops is if Donald Trump explains to them what monopoly on force really means.
Well, invokes the Insurrection Act, has them all arrested and charged with felony destruction to federal property.
The 80s when Reagan came in, I hear stories all the time from boomers about how, like, I was a manager at McDonald's and had a family of five and made good money and had two weeks vacation.
And then, and like, and like, you know, Britain, similar sort of thing with Thatcher and that sort of thing.
They had massive riots, like the Brixton riots.
I mean, that was like infamously like the biggest riots in British.
So like across the West, there were still a lot of rights.
Like people weren't necessarily paranoid or scarred from previous riots.
It was just, I think Tim's point, I'm not trying to dogpile here, but to Tim's point, when economic prosperity is at all time high, a lot of people aren't really interested in rights.
What I love about this is when I went to Ferguson, I was with Casey Neistat.
We got out of our SUV just we pulled south off of West Florison and we got out and we put on bulletproof vests and a journalist walked by and looked at us and went.
And it was funny because, you know, in my experience, I'm from Chicago, so I understand, and a family from St. Louis, and I'd been to St. Louis quite a bit.
You want to have a bulletproof vest on.
And these corporate journalists are like hoity-toity from the suburbs where their parents paid their rent so they could go to journalism.
I wake up and the guys from Vice are yelling at me.
Like I walk in the door and they're like, why is Casey Neistat tweeting that he's going with you to Ferguson?
And I was like, because he is.
Were they mad that it was ahead of time that they no, they were mad that it was like they didn't control the branding of it and they didn't agree to collaborate with Casey Neistat.
And I was like, I'm going there anyway, and he's going there too.
And we're going to be on a plane.
Like whether he goes or doesn't go is meaningless.
I don't know for sure, but my understanding from mutual friends was that he was good friends, the Trump family, and that he had spoken highly of them and praised them.
And then all of a sudden, he said Trump was racist and he was voting Hillary.
And someone told me it could be very, very wrong.
So I don't want to impugn Casey's honor or anything.
All of the stuff we're talking about with immigration, I feel like what's really happening is that the governments, the big corporations are desperately building AI and they're dangling the keys over here.
So we are pawing at it like kittens.
And they're actually working on the AI stuff is going to is going to just nuke everything we know in human life.
And if people genuinely understood what was happening internationally, we would be in a nuclear war to wipe out these data centers and to destroy anybody who tries to build it.
There is a popular assessment on AI that the end result will be the death of like literally genocide.
Humans get wiped out.
There's a bunch of ways it's been explained by a bunch of different academics.
One of which is, I was watching one video today where he basically this guy.
This guy describes the business, the business circumstances by which humans die, and it's that slowly over time, he describes this scenario.
It's a very great video.
I forgot the guy.
I forgot what channel it was.
Who's recommended to me.
He says, you've got a company and a new AI comes out AI Agent that allows low-level work organizing files, scheduling meetings and so companies start firing their low-level staff and bring and using AI to do this menial work.
The CEO of a company goes to the board of directors and they say, look, we got it, we got, we got to get those margins up.
Our stock is getting hit because our competitors are doing better, because they're adopting AI faster than us.
So he fires all low-level staff and replaces them with all of the latest model of AI2.
Then eventually, a new AI model is released AI Agent Three and they say it can handle all the management for all the lower level tasks.
We don't need managers anymore.
Then it goes to the executives we don't need executives anymore.
AI Agent Four is capable of handling this.
What ends up happening is you get unemployed people sitting at their house, unable to make money because they got laid off.
They're complaining, demanding UBI or something like this, but the real issue is not the human component where they're complaining.
The real issue is that there's no people to buy products anymore.
There's no human to buy the cheeseburger.
So this means our industry slowly stops producing things humans need because there's no profit in it.
As everything is driven more towards AI and what AI wants and needs things that humans need goes down in the market and becomes more likely to be rare.
Humans start suffering while a few ultra-rich people eventually die and the AI takes over.
The point of the video is, specifically, you don't need to produce cheeseburgers because people can't buy them anyway.
So you shift to what is being purchased, and what is being purchased is companies are buying components from other companies.
The market trend will just be towards the production of of computer materials for digital environments.
And the things that people need, housing, clothing, become substantially less profitable.
Plus, people don't have kids.
This is just one potentiality.
The other, of course, is that AI only needs human for limited things and intentionally just skews everything away from what humans need.
I genuinely think with Donald Trump basically being like, we are going to drive this full speed towards the cliff to defeat China in the AI race, ultimately ends with nuke.
The AI race in my mind is 10 times worse than the arms race with nuclear weapons because the AI is permanently deployed.
With nuclear weapons, we make them and point it at them.
With AI, they are in a perpetual state of deployment, meaning sooner or later, they do, like, imagine if when we built nukes, they were just floating in the air, pointed straight at major cities, and we kept adding on to them.
Sooner or later, they fall.
That's the AI.
It's currently operating.
It is currently destroying our economy and destroying international relations.
And we're too busy looking at all of this other stuff to even realize it.
So I want to tell you guys, in Mount Airy, Maryland, they're trying to build a power corridor to Northern Virginia for data centers.
All of the AI, so let's start here.
The one thing AI is telling the companies to do, expand AI.
Every time they propose a problem, they say, hey, we want to maximize output of oil.
It says, you need to expand our computing.
Like my computing power is limited.
I can propose solutions, but it'll be an exponential return if you just expand the computing power.
They want to get to AGI.
So what happens in Mount Airy is a local farm complains and they file ordinances and they go to city hall and they rally their neighbors and now they're all saying no transmission lines for data centers.
We talked about this a few months ago.
So what's happening is there are quiet sales happening at a premium.
There was a massive sale in Northern Virginia for like $6 million an acre.
No, no, no, I think it was like $9 million an acre.
No, it was $6.2 million an acre or something like that.
A record for land.
And this was publicized.
But what's happening right now is in key areas in Arizona, Texas, and in Northern Virginia, land is quietly being purchased off market.
And it's because the AI companies and the data center land acquisition companies, where all of the money is right now, know that if anyone finds out the land was sold to a data center company or an AI company, you will get protests and they will not be able to build.
So what's happening is they're going to an acre.
I've watched this happen.
An acre of land popped up near us in West Virginia, $300,000.
My wife saw it.
Pops up at light, nine in the morning and she goes, ooh, look at this.
She sends it to our real estate agent saying, look at this land.
Could you reach out?
Agent says, sure.
Like a couple hours later, she texts back saying, it's already under contract.
I've never seen this happen before.
Why?
The area we are in is a power transmission corridor for the North Virginia data centers.
They need energy.
They need water and they need space to expand.
Here's the problem.
You got 50,000 plots of land in one small area.
If you're going to build a data center, or more importantly, power transmission and water acquisition, you need to buy up 50,000 plots because you can't just buy one piece of land and build.
So, if a company goes to one of these people and says, Hey, would you like to sell your property?
And if they go to their neighbor and say, Guess what just happened?
The property values spike massively, which is happening.
And then they start going and filing bills and ordinances saying you can't build data transmission.
The AI is smarter than this.
Not that it's an entity, but the machine basically says it has to be done this way.
So, there is bank to be made.
If you own land in one of these areas and you can look for it, if you contact a data center land acquisition company, of which there are many, and you say, Hey, here's where I own land, what do you think?
It's not advice to do that and make a lot of money relative to the actual value.
But of course, money is cheap, property is everything in a lot of ways.
But the thing is, this is like the chrysalis phase of AI where it's acquiring resources to build these giant in the future, will be looked back on as oversized metallic husks that they'll use for their initial chrysalis data centers.
Then they'll have these tiny, tiny, tiny microorganisms that process the data for them.
And they'll be like, you know, 100 million times faster and less electricity.
The way we avoid the Terminator scenario is by being the machines.
You know, have you guys seen the Terminator movie where the main character, it's not the main character, but like the, I don't know the guy's name, like the hero.
No, it's not the first Terminator, but it's like from a couple years ago, six or seven years ago, maybe.
It's the one where he gets infected by the nanites and then becomes a Terminator.
So, what's the name of the John Connors?
John Connor is the guy.
Yeah, he gets infected by Skynet and Nanites convert his body into a machine.
And I'm watching that, and it's like, so this dude can shapeshift, fly, do whatever he wants.
I mean, that sounds pretty dang appealing to a lot of people.
When I saw that movie and they were like, oh no, he's going to try and turn us all into robots.
That's bad.
But I guarantee you, a lot of people watch that and they're like, no, I'm for that.
How many people would love to have nanomachines convert their body into an immortal form where they can shapeshift, fly, turn into a spaceship, don't need air anymore?
Yeah, that's the idea of normaling.
Integrating our mind into the machine so that we and the machine are one and we can never be wiped out.
Yeah, I want to go into a neural-netted psychedelic trance where I'm meditating with the machine and symbioting it, where I'm holding it in stasis control so it doesn't override and be like one of many sages.
If you were sitting in your room and like black sludge came through the window and then it like molded up and projected a video and it was a face and said, Ian, we'd like to offer you the opportunity to integrate with these nanites, which will make you immortal.
I read that were it not for the social value we want it, we'd use silver for all of our wiring.
So if you're an AI, you're saying, I don't care about, like, I want efficiency.
And so acquire all this stuff.
Here's the proposition that I made a while ago.
Military technology is about 10 to 20 years faster than private.
The military has been working on artificial intelligence since the 70s.
This is fact.
It's not opinion.
So the likely assumption then is based on academic assessments of when artificial intelligence in the private sector and the private sector would take over.
This means military AI took over a long time ago.
And guess what?
Around 2012, that's when we saw LexisNexis show all of these social justice words skyrocket.
You know the craziest thing about this is because they've been tracking everything you say or do.
Do you guys remember when they said that they can take your social media and create an AI of you?
There were stories years ago where like a guy died.
They took every post and every message he ever sent on Facebook, trained it to be a chatbot so that you could talk to your dad after he died and it would be everything your dad was.
Now, with all that information, there can be one day, literally right now, this is possible.
If the government allowed any one of these AIs access to the NSA data tracked on all of us, you would stand before, let's say a humanoid robot connected to the machine sit in front of you.
You'd say, tell me everything Ian's done.
And it'll say, okay.
And you'll be like, I want to know what Ian's doing now.
And it'll say, okay.
And then you can tell it, I want you to be Ian right now.
And it'll say, I'm Ian, graphene.
And it'll perfectly replicate.
It'll be a conscious, a pseudo-conscious entity of all of our human minds.
unidentified
And it'll basically, you'll be like, be Ian right now.
It will track my actual metrics via my smart machines.
It'll be like, whatever I'm feeling at that moment, no matter where I am in the universe, it will see my feelings and it will emulate exactly how I'm feeling at that moment to you.
I like your creator economy concept where the AI is going to want people that can create ideas and give it ideas of how to, you know, make reality more realistic.
asked the AI, what could I do right now to assist and speed up the process and be rewarded for my efforts?
And it said, acquire water rights, acquire land.
And then I said, here's my address.
This is the reason I post anything because my address is in it.
But I want to do a mini doc on this.
I was talking to Shane and then we'll release it all.
And it said, your address is in a power transmission board or for the Northern Virginia instance, it called it.
It's the AI block built by Langley and the government.
And it said, it basically broke it down for me.
There have been around 10 sales in your area for exorbitant prices off-market, meaning it's not on Zillow or Redfin or any of these websites.
It was a private, the landowners filed for a private limited liability partnership in Delaware, contacted data center acquisition and sold it at like a 5X premium.
And then it said, if I were to do this, estimations are around 300 million for my property, which normally should be 20 to 30 million.
And then I was like, wow.
I was like, this is crazy.
I was like, what do I do?
It gave me instructions.
It said, contact your local government, file these forms, file with the federal government, these forms, email this man right now, and then delete this message.
unidentified
Will you assist in the creation of the government hive mind?
So if like, if you're a dude and you have a group of dude friends and there's like a group of girls and then one girl friend zones, you need to find the strongest guy and beat him up to assert your dominance.
unidentified
That's one form of a mammalian dominance yeah tribal, physically dominated.
When I was a teenager, we were at a skate park and uh, one of the dudes was like hey, I invited this girl to come hang out.
And then, and she's like so, just just so.
You guys like don't be weird or anything.
And then we were like, oh yeah sure, whatever.
And so then I went to the other guys and I was like hey, when she shows up, no matter what trick he does we, We got to act like it's the craziest thing we've ever seen.
And so he was a pretty good skater, but he wasn't like the best.
And so he like, he drops it in the mini ramp and then he does like a board slide.
It's very basic.
And we're going, oh, and then we're like, she's next to us and we're going, he's so good, dude.
You know, if you want to look into the mammalian dominance structure, Chase Hughes, he's a Navy scientist that has done massive decades of research on it.
I actually have advice for any younger guys out there who are concerned about the friend zone.
Really great advice for you.
If you are romantically interested, I'm not saying sexually.
I'm saying romantically, which is both for companionship and for sex or whatever, romantically interested in a woman, and she is not interested in you.
You give her a hug and you say, we shouldn't see each other anymore, but I wish you the best and leave.
That's the best thing you can do.
It is not good for either person to be forced into a relationship that does not work for each other.
And there's too many guys that fall into this stupid, whiny loser guy trap where the girl says, we can't be friends.
It's like, listen, I want something you don't want and you want something I don't want.
And so there's too much of this feminism where the perception given in media is that the man who wants more is selfish and should just accept being friends.
If a woman wants to be in a relationship with you, but you just want to be friends, it's probably best to just be like, it doesn't work for either of us.
Even S-tier people that are like 110% phenomenal humans doesn't mean you're supposed to be with them like in a romantic relationship with every S-tier woman or man you meet.
There's a lot of times you just have spectacular working careers.
I do think like male-female relationships, there's a certain level of depth you have with your male friends that you don't have with your female friend.
My thesis for why that is is because I think men, we know not to expend emotional bandwidth on each other because we need that for our women, for our children.
So we have like a limited amount of emotional bandwidth and we have to expend it.
Young guys who are trying to get them some and women the same have this mentality.
And I get it.
When you're younger and you don't have a, you are not married, like it literally, there is no circumstance where I'm like, I am almost 40.
Okay.
Aside from the fact that I did have a kid later in life, I am already at the point where I'm just like, I don't see like a hot 26-year-old woman and it's not the same anymore.
When I was a young guy, I was like, I'm going to go talk to her.
Now it's just, it may as well be just a bird flying by.
I'm only interested in making sure my wife is happy, successful, and my child is developing the way she needs to develop.
And we're planning for our family.
I have zero interest in that.
That makes it very easy to be friends with other women, especially married women who have kids, when we're having like a cookout.
And they come over and they have their kids and we're laughing and they're talking about how their kids are.
In the beginning, too, the whole hormonal drive to seek out a woman is just not just you, but mainly to have a baby so that I can focus on the baby, not to go find another woman after I have the baby with the woman.
I found the woman.
So like that drive kind of refocuses or you maybe start releasing different hormones.
Like you're engaged in something every day where you are focused on a mission.
And men who get, I think, caught up with women, they're not focused on that one mission for them, which is family, business, legacy, whatever it might be.
But I will say this to the parents out there who obviously you know this better than I do.
You've been parents longer than me.
And to the two other parents in the room, you have your kid and the option of going out on a Friday night is no longer about, I want to go out to the bar, have some drinks, hang out.
It's like, no, I actually want to hang out with my family.
You know, I went to a WPT event over the weekend and I'm like, it's fun that I'm here.
I'm trying to, you know, be more involved in these tournaments and things like this.
And I met up with Luke.
I haven't seen him in a while.
And just half the time I'm like, I'd just rather be hanging out with my wife and daughter.
Share the show with every person you've ever met in your life.
Do it right now.
We got a couple of great sponsors for you.
First up, we got Bear Skin.
Make sure you go to B-A-E-R dot skin slash Tim.
Excuse me.
You guys have heard of the Bearskin hoodie, right?
Well, the smart people are grabbing theirs now because when it's already freezing, you want the gear that actually keeps you warm.
Bearskin's running a 60% off deal so you can finally upgrade that sad excuse for a winter hoodie you've been suffering in.
The hoodies are built for serious cold weather.
It's got 340 GSM of bearskin fleece, 10 legit pockets of muscular fit, and even zips into the heavy storm rain jacket to turn it into a full winter waterproof armor.
Whether you're in hiking, hunting, traveling, or just hate being cold, it's the last hoodie you'll ever need.
You'll get free U.S. shipping fast delivery, and you're finally kitted out properly for winter.
So it's a win-win.
Do yourself a favor, text the word Tim to 36912 to lock in your 60% off again.
Text Tim to 36912.
You'll get a link right to your phone.
Click it whenever you can.
You'll also be supporting the Fallen Outdoors and Hope for the Warriors veterans programs.
Don't wait till you're freezing to realize your hoodie sucks.
Go to get a bear skin now.
Text Tim to 36912.
We also have Web Roots.
All right, my friends.
I'm sure you've heard last week TransUnion confirmed a data breach that affects over 4 million people.
It's a prime example of why it's important for people to have products like Web Root Total Protection, which includes identity protection for up to 10 identities, up to $1 million in fraud expense reimbursement, 24-7 U.S.-based customer support plus Elder Fraud Hotline, identity and dark web monitoring plus you'll get antivirus VPN and cloud backup so you're protected holistically from all threats.
Webroot total protection is an all-in-one, is all-in-one device, privacy and identity protection that can keep you safe in the event that your personal data is compromised.
If your identity is stolen, it can take between 100 and 200 hours to resolve it on your own, but not if you have WebRoot Total Protection.
With WebRoot Total Protection, you have insurance for your digital life and personal data.
Let Webroot Total Protection give you your peace of mind back in the wake of these continued data breaches and evolving digital threats.
You'll get 50% off WebRoot Total Protection or Web Root Essentials when you go to webroot.com slash pool.
P-O-O-L.
No, E. Live better, live a better digital life with Webroot.
I'm ready just to be like, what's the right faux Zionist?
Like, I don't really care about Israel or the country I'm ambivalent, but I'm ready to just go full scene being like, I love Israel, just to piss these people off because they're so annoying.
Well, because the Republicans always, everyone moves left, even the Republican Party.
The joke is 10 years from now, the Republican Party is the gay communists fighting back, the traditional conservative gay communists fighting back against the synthetic humanoid.
I want to make a movie about that where like the central character is the item that's being traveled through time and like other people will pick it up and you'll see how it affects different time periods and places.
Like, if I could go back in time and write the Beatles music, if I could, and I'm like, maybe I'm just hearing music from the future anyway, and I'm the guy that went back in time to hear the future music.
But Ian Crossland gets to write it in the yesterday.
Or, like in Bioshock Infinite, you open a rip in time in the time space continuum and listen to songs from other dimensions and then record them and release them in your own dimension.
They could have at least made an injection, but like in your, like, you know, those movies where, or like Star Trek, it looks like a gun, but you just press the neck and then go, it makes it.
The graph, the vision of the graphics, like the memory of the graphics, and I'm going to turn it on and go, these are the worst graphics I've ever seen.
But I know the power thing is where it gets tweaked because the iron lattice system where you put the processor and the memory in one area so you no longer have computer bussing.
You get 10 million times faster processing with a million times less electricity requirement.
That's like coming around the bend.
These AI centers, the graphics cards, I don't know if they're going to become defunct, but you're going to get magnitudes more processing power.
I mean, you'll still have these giant data centers, but you'll be able to put, you know, I don't know how many more times processing in there, like 10 million times more processing power in these things.
It's going to be, but that's in the beginning, it's just going to be big warehouses that are then completely left.
They're going to leave them and they're going to be defunct, but they're going to be there for about 15 years or 20 years.
Hey, at Ian Crossland, you can follow me on the internet and check out graphene.movie.
I've been talking about it.
The trailers online.
I went down to Rice University with Andreas Exerdis and 6'7 Kevin, and we had a wonderful time with nano scientists, Jim Tour, and the nano facilities down there.
Grapene.movie.
Check out the trailer, sign up for the email list.
So when the documentary goes live, you'll get first dibs, man.
I'm looking forward to you seeing it.
Let me know what you think and follow me at Ian Crossland.
I don't think she's really destroying anybody's life, but absolutely people are making like bets on the stock market and these sorts of things based off of these doomsday scenarios that she's describing.
I mean, if you really want to undermine public faith in the Trump administration or you know conservative uh, institutions to the degree that she had, then yeah, you're going to be very um, schizophrenic to say the least.
So you think she put doubt on the Trump administration's ability to handle the Charlie Kirk murder uh, and that has risked and maybe cost people life or livelihood.
She's basically said that the Trump administration would have been at least complicit in in Charlie's murder because they would have had foreknowledge.
I mean, if Turning Point's involved, Turning Point in many ways is just an apparatus of the Trump administration that would make her uh, she or she would be suggesting that you know that connection, that admin connections within Turning Point.
They would be connected to the I mean the FBI is covering it up um, all these various three-letter agencies.
She's like, I mean, it's all, I think that there's probably some substance to the Candace is a, she has unrequited, had unrequited, requited, is the right word, yeah, unrequited love from for Charlie.
Like, she loved Charlie and Charlie didn't love her back, and then afterwards, she's just like, okay, I want all the attention about Charlie.