All Episodes
Previous Next
June 15, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:32
June 15, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You all know how I hate to make this program about me.
I mean, everybody else makes things about me, but you know how I hate doing it.
But I I have to start out today with two or three C I told you so that are pretty big out there.
They're gonna start with that, and uh then we just pile on with everything else that's happened between uh the last time we were here and today.
Great to have you, folks.
Always look forward to it each and every day.
Appreciate that you're there.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program in the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Let me find quickly here.
Was uh back on the 9th of September in 2015.
Wait a minute now, what did I do?
Ah, here we go.
It was the 9th of September of 2015.
I want to read to you.
Oh, yes, yes, yes, exactly right.
I was just reminded that um you see Trump went out and said that Obama's angrier at him than he was.
What did I tell you?
They dislike us.
I'm sure Trump was listening yesterday.
They dislike us more than they fear the terrorists.
And look at it it's it's been obvious to me for a while.
Whatever the terrorists do, the terrorists are not running for office in this country trying to oust Democrats.
We are, and as such, and there's more to it than that, of course, that they despise us.
They literally despise us, and Obama getting mad at Trump, more angry at Trump than he got at the terrorists, Trump pointing it out's accurate.
It's exactly right.
In fact, that was one of the CI told you so.
But back to my website.
Because there's a news story out there today.
And I first told you about this way back, September of 2015.
So not quite a year, like nine months, eight months ago, here we go.
You know why the Corker bill exists as it does?
You know why there's never any serious effort to stop Obama in making the Iran nuke deal.
Remember now back at this in this point in time, we were discussing why the Corker Bill, the Senate bill, Republican bill, which was made to look like opposition to Obama entering into a nuclear deal with Iran when in fact it was just the opposite.
And everybody was scratching their heads, and by this is a huge deal in terms of people's memory explaining Trump and everything.
Here you had the president of the United States involved negotiating with the Mullas in Iran.
We'd been told that we were negotiating with uh with moderates, there's the new branch of moderates there.
We had found them.
We're talking to them.
We weren't.
We were being lied to.
We were talking to the mullahs, the Ayatollahs, and we were going to secure for them a nuke deal.
But not just that, we were going to unfreeze 150 billion dollars in Iranian assets that um was a result of lifting sanctions.
And and everybody, what the hell are the Republicans doing?
It was the constant refrain.
Why are the Republicans not opposing this?
Why are the Republicans not opposing Obama?
Why are they facilitating?
And by the way, it continues today.
We now have a couple of Republicans who've stood up and announced that they agree with what Obama said yesterday about Trump.
And now there's a Reuters poll out that shows, or Bloomberg poll-out that shows uh Hillary up by 11.
The Republicans are panicking now, saying we gotta get rid of Trump at the convention.
This can't stand.
It is I mean, it w of of all the times to stand up and agree with Obama yesterday was not it.
Trump got under Obama's skin, and he got under Hillary's skin too.
For the first time any Republican has it, I don't know how long.
Put them both on defense.
That never happens.
And so the Republicans are panicking.
Oh no, oh no.
They use this poll from Bloomberg.
Oh, gee, and Dan Cena, the sound bites are coming up.
Still working on secret plans to oust Trump at the convention.
But anyway, back to the Iranian nuke deal.
And and uh uh ending the sanctions, which was going to make available to the Iranians 150.
What was it, a hundred and fifty billion dollars in frozen assets.
And everybody said, why are we doing why why are we helping?
Why in the our ally is Israel?
Why are we helping the Iranians nuke up?
Remember?
It was just last fall.
So back to my program on September the 9th of 2015.
You know why the Corker Bill exists as it does, why there's never any serious effort to stop Obama in making the Iran deal?
You have any idea?
It was money.
There was a news story, UK Daily Mail, not something similar.
Turns out it was a Bloomberg story in July.
The Iranian national airline, such as it is, is falling apart.
Their aircraft are old and dilapidated, and because the sanctions have been in place, they have been unable to buy new aircraft, replacement aircraft, or parts to repair what they have now.
So basically, their national airline's a joke.
Boeing, therefore, wants in on the deal to help the Iranians rebuild their national airline.
But in order for the deal to happen, 150 billion dollars in frozen Iranian assets needs to be unfrozen.
Now, Boeing is a contributor to the Republican Party.
And I said here, I wish I could remember what newspaper I read it in off the top of my head, Daily Mail, but turns out it was uh story from July.
And it was, I think, yeah, it was Bloomberg.
The headline at the nuclear deal means Iran can start replacing some of its museum vintage jets.
I don't know why I didn't get to this until September.
I think it probably with the uh evolution of Republicans and the Corker bill.
I think it reminded me of what I had read back in July.
So anyway, the Iran National Airlines a joke.
The mullahs have ordered a number of replacement aircraft made by Boeing.
Boeing wants the deal, but in order for the deal to happen, 150 billion dollars in frozen Iranian assets has to be unfrozen.
Now, Boeing, Republican contributor, the bottom line was that Republican politicians, elected officials basically had to please a very well-to-do donor or series of donors that were going to be able to engage in new.
In other words, the Republicans went along with this to satisfy big donor.
is the bottom line.
Everybody's trying to figure out why in the world, what is the substance of this?
We are going to facilitate a state sponsor of terrorism, perhaps the biggest state sponsor of terrorism, certainly the Middle East, We're going to help them modernize their nuclear power program.
They're getting centrifuges developed, and if anybody thinks they're not developing nuclear weapons, they're nuts, and we're helping, and we're gonna lift the sanctions.
Made no sense.
I mean, it made sense why Obama would do it.
It doesn't make any sense why the Republicans would help until you find out about the donor.
Well, to cut to the chase, story today.
CNN money, Iran.
We have reached a deal to buy planes from Boeing.
Iran says it's reached a deal to buy passenger aircraft from U.S. planemaker Boeing.
The announcement came Tuesday from Abbas Akhundi.
The Iranian Minister of Roads and Urban Development.
He said details on the agreement to be announced the next few days, according to reports by Iranian news agency.
Now I run the risk here in mentioning this coming off as anti-Beeing, anti-this.
I'm not.
I know I'm I'm fascinated by aircraft.
And I've got nothing but um respect and affection for Boeing.
I'm not crazy about this, but this explains it.
We knew last July, we knew last September.
And I'm just mentioning, because the proof has now come through.
It's taken a while for it all to develop, but that is why.
And that is it's a microcosm of why the Republican Party is in the position it's in with its voters.
The voters have figured out that their opinion, their votes, don't matter nearly as much, if at all, when compared To the donor class, not news.
I mean, the donor class is determining the Republican position on immigration and amnesty.
And it could end up influencing the Republican position on anything is the thing to be concerned about.
The original story was from Bloomberg, July 15, 2015.
The historic nuclear deal with Iran gives Boeing and Airbus a rare opportunity to reshape a civilian aviation industry.
So the Airbus was part of the original.
And they might be part of it now.
Boeing might be spending some of them.
They wouldn't have the money to do this were it not for Obama's nuke deal, lifting the sanctions, and it all happened with Republican facilitation.
And I'm reminded of the sound bites we didn't get to yesterday.
But that we have, Haley Barber questioning, you know, why after all these years of loyalty that we lose people like Rush Limbo was really great when Rush was our buddy, is really great when Russia was out there supporting us, but now something happened three, four years ago.
It's stuff like this.
How do you defend this?
You realize if if if I were a Republican shill learning this, I'd have to come here today and come up with some cockamamy excuse trying to convince you why this made sense.
I couldn't do it.
See, I told you so, number two.
Department of Homeland Security, quote, right wingers pose the same threat as Islamic extremists.
I led this program yesterday, reminding you yet again of my opinion that I think has been confirmed over and over again, that the American left, the Democrat Party, progressives, liberals, hate us, and I mean hate.
It isn't dislike, it is an irrational hate.
They hate us.
By us, I mean Republicans, conservatives, traditionalists, Christians, unit, they hate us.
And the proof is obvious.
This event happens, any event, any terrorist act now, any mass shooting, the first thing they do is try to link us to it, find a way to associate us with it, or blame us for it.
Without fail, never ever do they make an attempt to actually zero in on who's responsible, even when one of their primary constituency groups was the target of a mass death attack, in this case, homosexuals.
One month after the San Bernardino terror attack, this is in the Daily Caller.
One month after the San Bernardino terror attack that left 14 innocent people dead.
Department of Homeland Security Secretary J. Johnson told advisors that right wing extremists pose just as much of a threat to the country as Islamic extremists.
Johnson made the comments during the Homeland Security Advisory Council January meeting.
City of Austin, Texas, police chief Art Acevedo, or Asivito, I'm not sure how you pronounce it, whom Johnson appointed to the Homeland Security Advisory Council shifted the discussion to the threat of right wing extremists, according to the official meeting minutes.
Member Assavito reminded the council that the threat from right wing extremists, domestically just as real as the threat from Islamic extremism.
There isn't any right-wing extremism.
There isn't any right wing terrorism.
What are they talking about?
But it doesn't matter.
They tell themselves this in their private meetings, and the minutes have leaked.
Don't doubt me.
Folks, there is nobody who deconstructs the left better than this program.
Nobody that tells you who they are, how they do it, how they think, how they go about it, what their strategies are, nobody better.
Don't ever doubt me when I tell you who they are, what they're thinking, what they're doing, how they think they're going to accomplish it.
The evidence is just all around us.
And people, Russia, did you realize how strange it sounds?
I mean, we we love you.
We want you to sound good, but it's not strange to say that they dislike us more than they do.
We are considered by them a much greater threat to them.
Do you think do you think they care about anything beyond the maintenance of their own power and acquiring more?
That's what they care about.
Government is the instrument of their power.
They want to always be in charge of, they always want to run it.
They want to have control over as much of American life as possible.
The terrorists may blow up a gay nightclub.
The terrorists may blow up the World Trade Center, but there's never a terrorist on the ballot running against them.
But there are always going to be Republicans and conservatives running against them.
And that to them is a far greater threat than any act of terrorism.
And they're admitting it.
I'm not making it up, and I'm not wrong.
What to do about it?
What to do about it is simply learn it and accept it and understand it and realize there isn't any common ground here if we're looking for compromise, crossing the aisle, shaking hands, making Washington work.
These people, we need to view them within the political arena the same way they view us.
They are to be defeated.
It's asinine for Trump to say what he said yesterday, Obama to say what he said, Trump react, and then a bunch of Republicans stand up and agree with Obama.
If that's not a clear sign of it's the establishment versus the rest of all of us, I don't know what else could be.
But that's not the only story.
The guy in charge of catching crazed Muslim killers at Homeland Security is too busy worrying about the Tea Party.
These people are insane.
I'm not making a thing up.
This is from the minutes of their meeting last January.
The meeting was also attended by the co-chairs of the Homeland Security Advisory Council Subcommittee on Combating Violence.
These people have so many committees and meetings and so forth, it's no wonder they're not able to stop any acts of terrorism.
As originally reported by the Daily Caller on Monday, a report published by that subcommittee last week urged the Department of Homeland Security to avoid using the words Sharia and jihad when discussing terrorism.
But you can talk about extreme right wingers, you can you can mention right wingers, conservatives, you can call them anything you want.
You can insult them as brazenly and as completely as you want, but don't say sharia and don't say jihad, because we don't want to embarrass, we don't want to offend our Muslim buddies.
New York Times editorial.
Congress should secretly suspend Second Amendment rights.
A New York Times editorial today advocates for a new law allowing a secret court to take away citizens'right to own a gun at the discretion of the federal government.
That's an editorial in the New York Times now, but I guarantee you, if it's an editorial in the New York Times, they've talked about it with somebody.
You know this is the kind of thing that people like Obama and his regime are salivating over.
Take a break, back after this.
There is more here, ladies and gentlemen.
This is from the Daily Caller as well.
There is a Syrian immigrant who is a Homeland Security Advisor.
Syrian immigrant, one of the sitting members on the Homeland Security Advisory Council subcommittee on countering violent extremism is a 25-year-old immigrant of Syrian heritage who said the 9-11 attacks changed the world for good.
And has consistently disparaged America, free speech, and white people on social media.
Layla Alawa was one of just 15 people tapped to serve on the newly formed Homeland Security Advisory Council subcommittee in 2015, the same year she became an American citizen.
Just last week, the subcommittee submitted a Report to Jay Johnson recommending that the Department of Homeland Security avoid using Muslim terminology like Sharia and Jihad.
In September 2014, Layla Alawa, a member of the Obama administration, said 9-11 changed the world for good.
And there's no other way to say it.
I just hope we keep having open conversations about our differences.
3,000 Americans dead changed the world for good, and the woman is a new member of the Obama administration, Department of Homeland Security.
Another member of the Department of Homeland Security, the same advisory council from Austin is out talking about how right wing extremists pose just as big a threat or just as dangerous as Islamic extremists.
Don't doubt me, folks.
They despise us.
It's incredible.
And there's more.
And we're back.
Rush Limbaugh already, the middle of the week.
It's amazing how fast the week goes by when you don't work one of the days.
I believe it's already Wednesday.
Great to have you, as always, as we engage in yet another excursion into broadcast excellence.
The Hill.com actually reported on something I said yesterday, and they did it accurately.
Headline, Limbaugh dems hate GOP more than radical Islam.
Conservative pundit, I guess I've graduated from talk show host.
Conservative pundit Rush Limbaugh says Democrats hate Republicans far more than they do radical Islamic terrorism.
And they quote me.
And Obama was evidence of it yesterday.
Well, he goes out there and starts.
Look at, I'll say it again.
He sounded like a defense lawyer to me yesterday.
Sounded defensive about his own policy, sounded defensive about the enemy.
Sounded defensively, make sure we don't misunderstand Islamists.
This this tortured explanation for why he doesn't refer to it as what it is.
Islamic extremism, militant Islamic terrorism, he won't go there.
And he is lame excuses.
Well, it wouldn't help us win.
It's not going to intimidate them.
And of course, it wasn't about them.
It's always been about us trying to figure out just how seriously this country, this regime, takes this enemy.
And my point is he's more worried about us.
He's more worried about Trump.
He got angrier at Trump than he got and has gotten at any of this militant terrorism.
He gets angry at bitter clingers.
He gets sit around drinking beer in the middle of the day at the VFW hall listening to Rush Limbaugh.
That's on top of his previous descriptions of mainstream Americans, he calls bitter clingers, cling to their religion and their guns.
And it's contempt, folks.
And he has no problem displaying it.
Contempt for us, contempt for by us, I mean conservatives and Republicans, contempt for Trump.
But there's no contempt.
There's no dislike, there's no apparent anger, even when acts of terror occur and Americans are mass murdered.
It doesn't, there's the it's it's odd.
From the Hill.com, a similar story.
Ready for the here's the headline.
Democrats, GOP complicit in mass shootings.
It's by Mike Lillis.
Republicans' refusal to consider tougher gun laws makes them complicit in the nation's mass shootings.
Democrat leaders charge in the wake of the shooting in Orlando.
Representative Joe Crowley of New York said these 49 victims joined a long list of victims and families that are hurting.
You know, 3,000 Americans were killed on 9-11.
Not a single gun was used.
Are you aware of that?
3,000 Americans died, and not a single gun was fired.
But even so, how absurd is it to link us, because we are constitutionalists and defend it, including the Second Amendment.
We are now complicit in acts of terror.
There is not a single gun control law on the books that would have stopped this guy from doing what he did, and there isn't any future gun control law that would have stopped this guy from doing what he did.
By definition, criminals break the law.
And by the way, these Democrats know it.
They know they're lying to everybody.
They know full well what they're really after is the erasure of the Second Amendment, and don't forget this New York Times piece.
New York Times editorial today advocating for a secret court to suspend the Second Amendment.
New York Times editorial advocates for a new law allowing a secret court to take away citizens' right to own a gun at the discretion of the federal government.
This has been a liberal wet dream of potential orgasm for I don't know how long, and here they are, they can taste it.
They're so close to it.
Every act that results in the death of Americans is an opportunity.
It is sickening.
Rama Manuel never let a crisis go to waste.
It's an opportunity for them to advance their political agenda, which is what this is.
They know as well as anybody else that taking away average ordinary American's right to own guns is not going to stop what happened in Orlando.
It's not going to stop any act of terrorists.
Not going to happen what happened in San Bernardino.
They know it's not going to stop any crime committed with guns.
That's not the point.
They're not interested in getting guns out of the hand of criminals, folks.
They want guns that you own taken away from you.
They're not interested in getting guns out of the hands of criminals because everybody knows you can't, by definition.
Criminals break the law.
They will find a way to get a gun no matter what the law says.
Law-abiding people will not.
And this they know.
So now you have Joe Crowley, Democrat from New York, saying that we are complete.
Now, now imagine you're a low information voter, or you're a millennial, and your mind has already been wasted and destroyed by whatever education system that you've been subjected to.
So you've grown up believing all this tripe.
And here comes some Democrats, somebody just because he's a Democrat, you respect him.
And he starts linking what happened in Orlando to the Republican Party.
That the Republican Party was complicit in it because they will not allow the Second Amendment to be eliminated.
The scary thing is there are people who believe this, folks.
People whose minds are not yet made up.
Leftist progressives, of course, have had their minds made up.
And they will have their guns, by the way.
Whatever they do regarding you and me, they will find a way to keep their guns.
And don't doubt for a second that there are many of them, many on the left, many progressives who own guns and like using them.
And they're not going to give theirs away.
No, only conservative Republicans, average ordinary Americans will be forced.
And they're, with every act of terror, they get excited thinking they are closer to realizing this dream of theirs, which may even be a bigger dream than national health care is.
and they're so close to it now they can taste it.
Now, in the old days, a major terror attack would bring the country together.
In the old days, a major terror attack would end partisan rancor for a while, but not any longer.
A terror attack now is an opportunity for the American left and progressives and the Democrat Party to advance their anti-constitutional, anti-conservative agenda.
Crowley said, I guess these Republicans would just rather these events continue to happen, I guess.
I don't know what the answer is.
They're complicit in this by not acting and not taking a stance in some way.
As though gun control had this guy went through background checks.
This guy they did not have an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle or automatic rifle like they originally reported.
You know, it gets tiresome defending all this stuff every time it happens.
But obviously the need is there.
Stanny Hoyer, the Democrat whip in the House, pointed to an assault rifle ban as the surest way to have prevented the Orlando tragedy.
There's no such thing as an assault rifle.
You understand that.
There is no such thing as an assault rifle.
The weapon Hoyer is talking about requires a trigger pull for every shot, just like every other firearm in the U.S. But they want people to believe pull the trigger once and thousands of rounds are fired.
We gotta get rid of these automatics, semi-automatics.
It's not, they don't exist.
That doesn't matter.
Because the low information crowd doesn't know that.
Well, machine guns, yeah, but machine guns have been banned in the U.S. since the 1930s.
In fact, that's a good example.
Machine guns have been banned since the 1930s.
It's not stopping the Mexicans, is it?
It's not stopping the drug cartels, is it?
Take another obscene profit timeout and be back.
Don't go away.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Audio sound bites.
The Republicans and the drive-bys think that they've got Trump in the crosshairs now.
They think that their race is over.
They've got this Bloomberg poll.
And it shows Hillary has advanced her lead over the Trumpster.
I think he's up by she's up by 11 in this poll.
And since everybody knows that the presidential race is decided by polls in June.
It's over for Trump.
And the media and a bunch of Republicans are ecstatic about it.
We have a montage here.
Presidential campaigns are one or loss, not in the fall, but in the spring and early summer.
This might be a sinking ship.
The gap is widening between Hillary and Trump.
Trump has picked a bad time to have a bad time.
You cannot have your poll start cratering in June.
Sixty-three percent of women say they will never vote for Donald Trump.
That's pretty devastating in June.
Hillary Clinton opening up a double-digit lead.
Donald Trump with a 70% unfavorable rating.
Nobody has ever gotten elected president with a 70%.
You're starting to see perhaps the chickens coming home to roost.
The Trump campaign is experiencing his near-death political exercise.
This is a really critical period.
Republicans are looking for him to turn things around.
Not in a few days, but today quick.
Remember now, presidential elections are decided by polling data in June now.
Now somebody might want to tell President Dukakis about that.
You know, President Dukakis was leading big time in the polls.
President Cakis double-digit lead all through the summer until George H.W. Bush in concert.
By the way, this program started August 1st, 1988, and that's exactly when George H.W. Bush's polling fortunes began to turn.
I'm not kidding.
Anyway, Michael Ducox ended up losing, even though they were declaring him the winner.
I mean, Susan Estrich was his campaign manager.
He's on Meet the Press with the with Tim Russerton running around acting like they've won this thing months in advance because of polling data in June.
And here it is, seasoned political professionals.
Who did you hear there?
You heard John Heilman, you had Dan Seyor, who's a Republican establishment type.
You're an F. Chuck Todd of NBC News, Joe Scarborough, George Stephanopoulos, Matthew Dowd, former Republican uh strategist analyst now moved over to the no labels crowd, I think.
Savannah Guthrie of NBC News, Nicole Wallace from the George W. Bush communications office of White House, and Mark Halford.
And they've all it's over.
Trump has stepped in it now.
He said, bad time to have a bad time, and Trump's having a bad time.
And here's more from Seanor.
Senor was on CBS this morning.
John Heileman, who was co-hosting moving over from his Bloomberg Show because this drive-by media is so incestuous to Ralph Revolving Door.
Heileman said to Dan Seyno, by the way, Dan Sena, if the name sounds familiar, he he was he was for lack of a better public relations uh for Bremer, uh, the guy who was putting Iran Iraq back together in the green zone after we had ousted Saddam Hussein.
He was the spokesman.
He was more than that.
Uh he was an executive with Paul Bremer.
That's where you might remember the name.
Now, and he's big in Republican establishment circles.
He's on CBS this morning, and Heileman said to him, Let me ask a straight political question.
You have the Judge Curiel comments.
You have the response to Orlando, saying it's soldiers in Iraq stole from the recovery fund.
You have, I said, Republican leaders are more pessimistic about Trump's prospects than they've ever been.
So is there now a renewed push to dump Trump at the convention, Mr. Seenor?
There are two tracks being discussed.
One track continues to be a potential independent candidacy, which is very hard and very narrow at this point.
The other thing being talked about is whether or not some rules could be amended to actually force a real convention fight to replace him.
It's a long shot.
I don't know if it'll happen.
More and more you hear Republicans saying that the system, the establishment, the system, the whole machine supporting the Republican ticket can't sustain another couple weeks like these last couple weeks.
Right.
So it's over.
They have figured out that Trump has stepped in it one too many times now.
The judge business.
I haven't I I this is the first poll that I've seen that might have any damage to Trump on the on the judge business.
All last week there weren't any such data.
Um, polls, I mean, you you you you can't just arbitrarily toss them out when you don't like them.
You have to deal with them as they are.
Um but the interesting thing here is that the Republicans have no desire to even fight here.
They want dump this guy.
They want to toss him overboard.
They want Mitt Romney.
They want somebody to come back in there, they want to take over their own convention.
They want to toss Trump, they want to set up a whole brand new procedure so they can have a real, real open convention floor flight, fore flight, floor fight, get rid of Trump and put in somebody they want who's also guaranteed to lose.
But at least they will be happier.
Dan Rather was on CNBC this morning.
Joe Kernan said, you know, every article about Trump in the Huffington Post has a disclaimer at the bottom, saying he's a liar, he's a xenophobe, a racist, a misogynist, and a berther.
Can you imagine CBS or another news organization doing that?
I mean, this is the world we're in right now.
What do you think of that, Dan?
Put me on the record.
I'm not predicting he will win.
I will say he's capable of winning in November.
He has a path.
I'm not saying he will win, but he can win.
Democrats uh who want Hillary Clinton to be president should be afraid.
They should be very, very afraid.
Anybody who thinks that Donald Trump is going to moderate himself along the way is either slightly touched or smoking something very expensive.
It's just not going to happen.
Before this campaign is over, uh, it will be nastier than Apostle's mouth.
This is going to get really, really ugly.
The race is very fluid at the moment.
You could go away and not come back until sometime after Labor Day and not miss a whole lot.
Oh, I don't uh I I don't know about that.
Uh I don't think it's going to be a lull.
He just he contradicted himself there a little bit.
Uh he said uh this is gonna be nastier than a possum's mouth, but you're not gonna miss anything if you take time off from now to Labor Day.
The convention's coming up.
Anyway, the point, though, is that rather thinks these guys are getting a little bit overconfident now.
Rather thinks that Trump can win.
Now don't forget Rather's perspective here.
Whatever you want about Dan Rather.
He got caught running a phony fake story and actually lost his job for it.
That does not happen in the drive-by media.
His perspective on events is much different from the protected encircled class of people in the drive-by media, basically just Democrats with bylines.
But because disaster has happened, rather.
He is aware that it can happen, and Trump winning would be uh disastrous.
We have here one of the Lindsay Grimnisty.
Uh Yeah, these are Lindsay These will go together with this too when we have time.
I have to take another break here, folks, but hang in there because we're coming back before you know it.
Trump is in Atlanta campaign appearance.
Drive-by's breathlessly awaiting any Trump response to President Obama yesterday.
Our microphones are there as they're everywhere.
And who knows?
▲
Export Selection