Aug. 12, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
| 
| Time | Text |
|---|---|
| Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 podcast. | |
| Everybody's asking me, everybody knows me is a what is what is with this Hillary email stuff? | |
| Top secret stuff? | |
| Rush, what's going on here? | |
| I mean, the New York Times has a story and it says she's under investigation by virtue of leaks. | |
| And then Department of Justice knows it's not true, and the New York Times walks it back, but it was true. | |
| I'll tell you what I think. | |
| I think this is big. | |
| I think this is problematic for her. | |
| I think she's got two problems today. | |
| She's got this email server problem, and she's also got the polling data in New Hampshire. | |
| Have you seen this? | |
| Bernie Sanders is surging. | |
| He is up seven points over Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire, 4437. | |
| This is starting to be a replay of 2008, folks. | |
| It is just, it it's amazing here. | |
| I tell you, I said yesterday's making a joke, by the way, greetings and welcome back. | |
| Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh here, 800-282-2882. | |
| You know, I was I was being jocular yesterday and laughing and chuckling here, saying that uh it's not Bernie Sanders' overwhelmingly popular personality and charisma that's generating all the support. | |
| It's that people hate Hillary. | |
| And you go back to 2008, maybe they said, what's the common denominator? | |
| Obama comes out of nowhere, steals the coronation from Hillary Clinton. | |
| Here comes Bernie Sanders really, really out of nowhere. | |
| And he's surging ahead of Hillary. | |
| And what's the common denominator? | |
| And this is Hillary. | |
| And it seems like the only people who haven't gotten the message that she is to be coronated is Democrat voters. | |
| And then you have the email problem over here, and I think, you know, I just got my uh formerly nicotine-stained fingers on the actual release statement from the inspectors general of the intelligence community. | |
| When you read this, I mean you hear this being discussed on TV and so forth. | |
| When you read this, which I shall share with you in moments, the uh the money stuff from this. | |
| I mean, it it's it's it's potentially really serious stuff. | |
| I mean, we've we we now have the specter, the uh the uniqueness of a candidate for the presidency under criminal investigation. | |
| We just haven't been here before. | |
| Now, one of the I'm gonna scattershot this before I come back here and assemble it all together, because I'm trying to answer a bunch of questions people have asked me at randomly. | |
| Uh Rush, why did they wait so long to get the server? | |
| I mean, why why why they why normally wouldn't the FBI Van be over at her house with a search warrant and just grab that server once the allegation has been made that there are classified top secret documents on that server. | |
| What is this waiting around for her to turn it over stuff? | |
| And I think, you know, it's it's it's hard to say definitively philosophical explanation for how the Department of Justice operates, because this one's run by Obama. | |
| And so that means it's been profoundly politicized. | |
| But in the normal ebb and flow of things, Department of Justice lawyers and even uh district United States attorneys have at least judging by recent experience have been reluctant to hand down indictments or announce charges during a campaign because they don't want to be accused of politicizing. | |
| They wait until after an election, and then they dump what they've got. | |
| Announce charges, file an indictment, hand one up, whatever. | |
| And the reason is they don't want to be accused of of entering the political process and affecting the outcome. | |
| Now, that's with DOJs prior to Obama. | |
| We don't know what this DOJ is. | |
| Well, we do. | |
| I mean, we we know that this DOJ has been entirely politicized, and so that theory could be out the window with this Department of Justice. | |
| It's kind of like, you know, these two guys, Heileman and Halpern, they write these books during the campaign and they hold everything they learn until after the election in order to sell Their book. | |
| But if they released what they've learned and some of its blockbuster stuff, it would have affected the outcome of elections. | |
| And we've always said, why are you holding it, guys? | |
| You're journalists. | |
| You're finding out things and you're keeping it from the voters. | |
| And they say, yeah, because we want to sell books and get rich like you. | |
| Well, they don't say that, but everybody knows what the objective. | |
| Well, the DOJ is kind of the same, and U.S. attorneys are kind of the same way, uh, not wanting to be accused of affecting the outcome of things. | |
| Now, this circumstance is politics all over it. | |
| There are some things that we know. | |
| We know that there is no love lost between Obama and the Clintons, both of them. | |
| That's undeniable. | |
| It's not a matter of speculation. | |
| We also know that both sides keep each other at arm's length. | |
| I mean, both sides know what the other is capable of. | |
| And so there is a mutual sort of respect. | |
| Neither side's going to make an overt move to take the other one out unless they can be guaranteed to do it. | |
| The old saw about you don't take a shot at the king unless you know you're gonna hit bullseye. | |
| And so we are left to try to analyze this without having the benefit of getting very deep in terms of actual knowledge and and facts. | |
| Now, do you remember last week the New York Times reported two inspectors general had asked the Department of Justice to do a criminal investigation of Hillary's emails? | |
| And then do you remember how the New York Times had to walk that report back because the DOJ denied it? | |
| There was no investigation. | |
| And the New York Times, but we've been told we've got leaks, we've got sources. | |
| The DOJ said, sorry, you have been misled. | |
| And the New York Times walked it back. | |
| Even though their reporters and their editor all swore that they had multiple sources and even confirmation from the Department of Justice. | |
| And do you also remember how some people wondered at the time if maybe the Obama White House didn't get on the phone and tell the DOJ to change its tune and a hold up and stop this investigation? | |
| Now, what if that's actually what happened? | |
| What if Obama getting on the phone and telling a DOJ, hey, you guys got to deny that, you got to walk this back, and in the process, what does that do? | |
| That kind of convinces Hillary that nobody's going to come after her. | |
| That could telegraph a message that she's safe and that she can trust the DOJ and the rest of the regime with her server. | |
| And at that point, we get her reversal. | |
| At that point, we get Hillary's decision, change her mind, and turn over the server. | |
| Otherwise, the timing of this is really, really coincident. | |
| And now, after the DOJ tells Hillary and the New York Times, everybody there was no story here, there's no investigation. | |
| The next thing we know, and by the way, they still don't have that server. | |
| An agreement's been made or an arrangement, but they don't have it yet. | |
| From what I'm told, they've got a thumb drive. | |
| They know that there are at least, I'll read the statement here to you, they've got they've got evidence that there are classified documents on her email on her server that go all the way up to top secret. | |
| So this is now a serious criminal investigation. | |
| I have suspected, because of what I said here at the beginning, that Obama and the Clintons have to keep each other's arms distance that Obama can't move in for the kill here for obvious reasons, but he could do it drip, drip, drip. | |
| You know, every day a little bit more news shows up about Hillary's server and her emails and what's on it. | |
| And this drip, drip, drip, continues to create doubt, doubt, doubt in the minds of your average ordinary news consumer, particularly readers of the New York Times. | |
| And there's nothing Hillary can do about that because she can't prove anything, and she can't deny it. | |
| She can't she can't accuse Obama of doing this because Obama's walked it back, or the DOJ has walked it all back. | |
| And then there's another theory. | |
| This is the what has been described as the tinfoil hat theory. | |
| And it is this. | |
| Yes, there are top secret documents on the server of Hillary Clinton among her emails. | |
| What if there is also something about Obama on this server in an email or something that he doesn't want anybody to know? | |
| So you go get the server, you get it in your possession, and then nobody hears anything about it for quite a while. | |
| I mean, we're we we've we've got the what they used to call it back then, the appearance of impropriety, Mr. Snurton. | |
| You remember that? | |
| Whenever the Republicans were dancing out there on the edge of anything, the media, the left always referred to an appearance of impropriety. | |
| Well, we got even more than that with Mrs. Clinton. | |
| It's she's in she's in real trouble over. | |
| She's lied. | |
| She has licensed nothing on the server. | |
| She says there's nothing classified on the server that she looked at it. | |
| She picked out 30,000 emails and withheld them because about yoga and uh and her daughter's wedding. | |
| You know, anybody looked at Hillary lady, she looked like she's doing a lot of yoga. | |
| 30,000 emails worth of it. | |
| Not to me. | |
| But she's she's openly lied about this, and then over here you got Bernie Sanders just surging, and just a little side night about this, because all of this is gonna pave the way either for Uncle Joe Biden to come in, or Lurch, John Kerry, who uh uh uh definitely wants to throw his hat in his ring. | |
| And there's that aspect of this too. | |
| Well, you take a look now at at the Democrat uh presidential primary, and you get to who are the two frontrunners here? | |
| An aging, frumpy nurse ratchet kind of non-charismatic, stern-looking woman, and over here a guy that looks like he's eighty-five years old bounding about, being thrown off the stage by black lives matter protesters. | |
| And yet we're told the Democrat Party is the party of youth and hip and cool and all of this, and yet the best they can come up with is a couple of dinosaurs who both happen to be white, who both happen to be Marxists to one degree or another, but where is the youth? | |
| Where's the hip? | |
| Where's the cool? | |
| So, man, there's all kinds of stuff going on, and that's before we even get to the latest with Donald Trump and what's happening with the with the Republicans. | |
| We've also got some lifestyle news today. | |
| Big major study, ladies and gentlemen, showing that men never get over a heartbreak, that it affects them for the rest of their lives much, much, much, much more so than heartbreak affects women. | |
| Heartbreaking men is eternal. | |
| It lasts forever, it never goes away, says the research. | |
| With women, not nearly as bad. | |
| The second lifestyle story is a story that says having a baby, having a child makes you more unhappy than losing your job, the death of a spouse or family member, in other words, having a child makes you miserable. | |
| Just that nobody has the guts to say so unless they're privately interviewed about it. | |
| I'm just telling you I've got it there. | |
| It's all coming up here in the uh stacks of stuff. | |
| In the lifestyle section of the EIB network today. | |
| But this email thing, folks, in Hillary and the Justice Department, whatever's going On here, you know, Obama uh and and he runs a DOJ, and however he wants this to play out. | |
| I mean, you you can analyze this, you know, in a generic sense and look at DOJ past behavior, and then you have to throw that out because this is Obama's DOJ, and everything they do is politicized. | |
| And everything they do is oriented toward advancing uh the Obama agenda, now the Obama legacy. | |
| I don't think Obama wants Hillary to be part of his legacy. | |
| Just my take. | |
| So let me take a quick timeout. | |
| We'll come back into some sound bites about this, uh, and you'll hear from other people. | |
| I have the statement from the inspectors general of the intelligence community and the Department of State regarding the review of Senator Clinton's former Secretary Clinton's emails. | |
| Uh it's not good, folks. | |
| Now, I I'm not jumping the gun. | |
| Like Rich Lowry at National Review says, okay, she's toast. | |
| It's over, and that's because of Bernie Sanders. | |
| Not because that's email stuff. | |
| Email stuff is part of it. | |
| But Bernie Sanders surging to a 44 to 37 point lead among Democrats in New Hampshire. | |
| That is considered huge to these professional political science uh analysts, you know, who live and breathe polling data as their guiding light on prognosticating the future. | |
| Anyway, you sit tight because we've got a full jam-packed excursion today. | |
| Don't go away. | |
| Now, one more thing. | |
| A lot of people want to know well, why if if they don't have the server, or forget that. | |
| Last week we heard about all this. | |
| And the week before that we heard about all this. | |
| And yet nobody went to get the server. | |
| They didn't seize the server. | |
| And all kinds of legal experts were posting blogs expressing shock and dismay that the Department of Justice or the FBI had not sent the van, the evidence van over there to the Chappaqua compound to pick up the server. | |
| Well, there is a little problem there, folks. | |
| Remember now we're talking about the home of a former president of the United States. | |
| I don't care. | |
| We're all equal before the law, but former presidents are more equal than the rest of us. | |
| And one of the things they have is Secret Service protection. | |
| There are Secret Service people surrounding that compound. | |
| They are inside that compound. | |
| The FBI, can you imagine showing up with their evidence van and they've got a warrant to go in there and get that server and the Secret Service saying, I don't care what you've got, you're not getting in this House. | |
| Our job is to protect this House, and you can't get in here. | |
| And then you've got a battle. | |
| Both are run by the Treasury Department. | |
| They're both executive branch, but then you've got a battle between the Secret Service and the FBI. | |
| I'm speculating on this. | |
| I mean, this could be nothing, but I it could be an explanation for why there has not been an aggressive move to go get the server. | |
| But I do not believe that Mrs. Clinton has had a reversal of thought and been shamed into giving up the server. | |
| I don't think that's because you can't shame the Clintons. | |
| And there are no coincidences with the Clintons. | |
| I think the idea she's going to give up the server is an i indication of the seriousness of the legal problem that she's got. | |
| And I don't know, by the way, if she even looks at it that way. | |
| I have no clue how these people live their lives. | |
| You know, I I have no idea what Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton might think with the DOJ coming after them if they think it's all for show, nobody's going to touch us, we're untouchable. | |
| Uh, but people have to do this, they have to go to their motions, making it look like they're coming after us, but at the end of the day, we know they won't. | |
| I don't know how they process this stuff. | |
| A normal person when the DOJ is coming after you, it's the worst day of your life. | |
| You get scared to death, and if you didn't do it, the only thing you want to do, you go to get a lawyer and you want to start cooperating the best you can. | |
| Um if you did do it, you go get a lawyer and you shut up and and try to give the illusion of cooperating, but the Clinton's, I have no idea. | |
| Uh I do not share a mindset with them. | |
| I mean, I I I understand a lot of their psychology, but you know, when the law's coming after you, I mean, these people used to be in charge of the law. | |
| Don't forget Mrs. Clinton apparently called Secret Service agents pigs because her daughter Chelsea picked up on it. | |
| She also calls them pigs. | |
| Uh and there have been several Secret Service agents revealed this in uh books and articles following their service at the uh at the White House. | |
| So my only point is I don't, I don't really know if Mrs. Clinton thinks that she's in jeopardy or not. | |
| And if she does think she's in jeopardy or realize it, I don't know if she's taking it seriously or thinks it's just part of the process because she's a Clinton and there's powerful forces and right-wing conspiracy out to get her. | |
| Have no idea. | |
| But just looking at this in your good old-fashioned standard commonsensical way, you have to say she's in trouble. | |
| That this is serious, especially when you see what the inspectors general of the intelligence community have released here, which I'm not teasing you with this. | |
| I just need a little bit more time to go through it than I had in this particular segment. | |
| We'll do that, we come back, get your phone calls here pretty quickly too. | |
| You'll love everything, folks. | |
| Hang in there and be tough. | |
| Okay, here's a statement from the Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community and the Department of State regarding a review of former Secretary Clinton's emails yesterday. | |
| And this is uh this is dated back in July, by the way. | |
| This is all the way back July 24th. | |
| Keep that in mind. | |
| So I just, but but seeing this in print, this is how old this is. | |
| July 24th is August 12th. | |
| Now, I look, I know, I know, I know, I know some of you think all this is smoking mirrors and that everything's happening here is to protect Hillary. | |
| Now, and you could be right. | |
| But that would mean that Obama is engaged in the protection mechanism. | |
| And I just I don't believe that. | |
| I don't think Obama wants her to be president. | |
| I don't think Obama wants her at the levers that could change or dismantle what he thinks the greatest legacy in the history of presidencies. | |
| And I guess any love lost, and I think this drip drip drip of information about this that's come out, the leaks that were supposedly not true that turned out to be true. | |
| I think it's all been designed to chip away at her support and uh character and to start raise and create doubts about her. | |
| And you have to say that if that's what's going on, it's working, all you gotta do is look at Bernie Sanders and say, who? | |
| Bernie Sanders is drawing these crowds of I've even got a post in the Washington Post today talking about Bernie Sanders drawing crowds of 100,000 people. | |
| And the guy writing the post says, that doesn't mean anything. | |
| And then pretends or proceeds to explain why crowds of 100,000 people don't mean anything. | |
| Now the Washington Post is trying to protect Hillary, there's no question. | |
| New York Times, probably too. | |
| But they ran that first leak about all of this, and then they were humiliated into retracting it, and they've got to be burning over there because they were right the first time. | |
| Okay, yesterday, this back July 24th. | |
| Yesterday, the Office of the Inspector General, the intelligence community, that's the ICIG, sent a congressional notification to intelligence oversight committees updating them, the ICIG support to the State Department IG. | |
| The ICIG, again, Inspectors General, Intelligence Community, found four emails containing classified intelligence community-derived information in a limited sample of 40 emails of the 30,000 emails provided by Clinton. | |
| The four emails which have not been released through the state FOIA process, Freedom of Information Act, did not contain classification markings and or dissemination controls. | |
| These emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department. | |
| Rather, these emails contain classified information when they were generated. | |
| She lied through her teeth about that. | |
| These emails contain classified information when they were generated. | |
| For those who've been real, it means written. | |
| And according to Intelligence Community Classification officials, that information remains classified today. | |
| The stuff that she wrote about is still classified. | |
| And this classified information should never have been transmitted via an unclassified personal system. | |
| Now you can say that the DOJ is trying to shield Hillary, but that's who's writing this. | |
| Or who wrote this and is explaining how egregious a violation this is, or was Inspectors General of the Intelligence Community made a referral detailing the potential compromise of classified information to security officials within the executive branch. | |
| I'm going to go back here to July 24th. | |
| The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government's possession. | |
| So we've seen news reports about this. | |
| But I the when you read this from the inspector's general actual statement or release, you look back, it's July 24th, and still today, they don't have the server. | |
| Now you may have heard that they've got this. | |
| They know what's on, but they don't have it. | |
| Some of the emails that they found that she turned over, they found this stuff. | |
| This is a total cluster here, folks. | |
| The main purpose of the referral was to notify security officials that classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive, it'd be Hillary's, that are not in the government's possession. | |
| An important distinction is that the intelligence community inspectors general did not make a criminal referral. | |
| It was a security referral made for counterintelligence purposes. | |
| The ICIG is statutorily required to refer potential compromises of national security information to the appropriate intelligence community security officials. | |
| Now it be has become criminal now. | |
| Back on July 24th, they just made a security referral, but now it has become a criminal referral. | |
| To the audio sound bites, here's Mrs. Clinton, March 10th in New York City. | |
| Remember that press conference in the UN that she did when all of this first surfaced? | |
| And she had this server. | |
| She was running her own email program, her own domain. | |
| She had all that private server, private email, because she didn't want the government to know what she was doing. | |
| And that's when the stories came out that she was selling access by way of donations to her crime family foundation on the cum. | |
| She's she was accepting donations from foreign governments. | |
| The clear reason would be they think they're investing or donating, contributing to a future president. | |
| And so the seeds of a scandal were planted. | |
| Mrs. Clinton had to head it off at the pass. | |
| She happened to be in New York anyway, so she decided to go to the U.N. and do the press conference there because it was assumed that the United Nations press corps would not be as up to speed on the story because they don't cover Hillary daily. | |
| So they thought it'd be a cakewalk. | |
| And at this press conference, she ended up making a fool of herself. | |
| She was totally unprepared as usual and had to slink out of there. | |
| It backfired on them. | |
| And this is an excerpt from that press conference. | |
| It's just 14 seconds, so here it is. | |
| The server contains uh personal communications from my husband and me. | |
| And I believe I have met all of my responsibilities, and the server um will remain uh private. | |
| Uh sir uh will remain uh private uh personal communications from my husband and me, and um, I believe I've met the ICIG found four emails containing classified IC derived information in a limited sample of 40 emails to four emails were not retroactively classified by the State Department. | |
| These emails contain classified information when they were generated. | |
| And according to IC classification officials, that information remains classified today. | |
| And then we learned yesterday's top secret. | |
| That's the classification. | |
| March 10th, she's lying about it. | |
| Nothing on there, but yoga and Hillary's uh Chelsea's wedding and uh where she was registered, wherever that was uh for the wedding and so forth. | |
| Nothing to see here. | |
| Lied through a T Trey Gowdy this morning, Fox America's newsroom, Bill Hammer says, okay, the inspector general says top secret emails were on her server, private server. | |
| What are your questions now? | |
| Is the public record complete? | |
| Every explanation that Secretary Clinton has provided about a week later was proven to be demonstrably false. | |
| This is just the latest one of those assertions that she neither sent nor received classified information. | |
| Well, that is patently false. | |
| But what I'm primarily concerned with is whether or not I'm going to have access to the records that I need to do the job that the House asked me to do. | |
| And as you know, she is turning over her server, which I find to be an interesting choice of words. | |
| The Bureau usually doesn't ask you to do things. | |
| They demand that it happened but she wiped the server clean. | |
| So what are we going to be able to get from the server? | |
| And her lawyer self-selected the public record from the private record. | |
| Yeah, except they've got those four emails. | |
| They've got something, and then there's the thumb drive. | |
| But his point here is what do you mean it's going to turn it over? | |
| This is what everybody's been saying. | |
| Why don't they just go get the thing? | |
| Why doesn't the FBI evidence van pull in with a search warrant, go in there and secure the server, which they would do with any other target, person of interest, whatever. | |
| And that's why I think you know, you FBI would have to go through the Secret Service. | |
| And I don't know who would be up for something like that. | |
| Uh Judge Napolitano on Fox believes that Hillary's in grave danger because of this. | |
| America's newsroom today. | |
| He was asked, how serious is this? | |
| Is there an obstruction case here, Judge Napolitano? | |
| Legally, I believe she is in grave jeopardy. | |
| If she is charged with failure to protect these secrets, she will not be permitted to tell a jury. | |
| It was a mistake. | |
| I didn't know it was a secret because the word secret was not stamped on it. | |
| Those are not defenses in a case like this. | |
| Why not? | |
| Because before she became Secretary of State, she was required to go through a one-hour tutorial given by FBI agents, at the end of which she had to sign a statement under oath in which she recognized that she had an absolute duty to protect national security secrets. | |
| And in the face of that duty, she ran them through her server, which was unsecured. | |
| Now, keep in mind that one of the assertions here in the IG report is that she generated these emails. | |
| Clearly says here contain classified information when they were generated. | |
| Now that could mean generated by the person sending them to her, or generated by her. | |
| The original sender could mean any number of things. | |
| But they what it emails wouldn't necessarily be stamp top secret, I guess. | |
| But anyway, he's saying it's no excuse. | |
| And we'll just have to wait and see. | |
| I I'm like a lot of people. | |
| I can't see this ever really materializing into something political that leads to her being indicted in jail, anything like that. | |
| But I can see this having and continuing to have a deleterious effect on her campaign, because we are talking about somebody. | |
| This is we've not been here before. | |
| And I know we have arrived at a lot of places now that we've not been before in our lifetimes. | |
| Um I know an oath in this administration is meaningless in many cases. | |
| I mean, a lot of the Obama they've taken oaths that they have violated. | |
| So I understand all that, folks. | |
| But you still have a candidate for the presidency under criminal investigation. | |
| That's something you usually see after an election or after a candidate drops out or loses or something. | |
| Starting on the phones in Detroit today, this is Steve. | |
| Steve, welcome, sir. | |
| Nice to have you with us. | |
| I'm glad you called. | |
| Hi. | |
| Thanks, Russ. | |
| Great to be here. | |
| So I believe that these bullets she's taking now on the obstruction or on the sending of the classified emails are just that. | |
| They're bullets that are going to wound her severely. | |
| But I do believe the bullet that's going to put her down for good lies within the content of the tens of thousands of emails. | |
| Anyone with half a brain knows the reason she wanted to use a private email address and server when she very well could have just used the one given to her by the government is because she wanted to send content that she didn't want to have inspected and looked at. | |
| This is true. | |
| This is very, very true. | |
| Very brilliant observation. | |
| So inside those tens of thousands of emails, I can speculate that you know you don't operate the Clinton cash globally without a whole lot of strategy and direction and coordination, emails out to her minions, the political hacks that are sitting inside the Clinton Foundation. | |
| God knows what's in those emails, but we know that their emails she didn't want to flow through the White House. | |
| Now, what would you repeat again? | |
| Uh what do you think gonna be the the uh I'll change term bullet will change that around uh just like we'll call it the wizard, like they did in Washington, changed the bullets of the wizard. | |
| What do you think the wizard is that's gonna bring her down? | |
| I have no idea specifically what it is, but I believe it's inside the content of those tens of thousands of emails are things she did as far as foreign donations. | |
| You don't you you don't think there's gonna actually be a criminal prosecution? | |
| How's anybody gonna find out? | |
| Because now that they've got the server, they can go back and retrieve the content of those emails and actually read what she was sending. | |
| What if it's been wiped? | |
| It doesn't matter. | |
| I I work in IT, that's what I do. | |
| I own a software consulting firm. | |
| They can retrieve those emails if they were ever sent through there, they can get a hundred. | |
| Well, they've got to be somewhere. | |
| They're not, even if she didn't wipe her server. | |
| Even if she really really wiped it. | |
| I don't mean just deleted them. | |
| She really wiped them. | |
| They got sent someplace. | |
| Somebody has them. | |
| The recipients have them, right? | |
| Well, I I you know, it's it's it's um. | |
| It starts it's just a repeat of 2008, only worse. | |
| I mean, here you had Obama came out of nowhere, and at least half the media just abandoned Hillary and went for the guy. | |
| Half Democrat Party abandoned her, and we didn't even have a scandal like this. | |
| Now we've got her under criminal investigation. | |
| All of this email stuff, uh, and whatever else drip, drip, drip, negative. | |
| It's and over here, Bernie Sanders burning and tearing the place up. | |
| And it's it's a combination of these two that are really making people think that she's now toast in terms of winning the Democrat Party nomination. | |
| And you got people arguing again, come on, rush. | |
| You don't fall for that. | |
| She's Hillary Clinton. | |
| They're gonna give it to her this time. | |
| All of this is just a bunch of made-up BS designed to get people sandbagged into thinking she's toast, she's gonna come back when nobody's looking, she's gonna roar strong, take standards out, she's gonna be there. | |
| And I know a lot of people have this perpetual fear that Hillary Clinton is unbeatable. | |
| It just it's ongoing and never ending. | |
| But if you look at real life and practical history, you find out it did happen in 2008, and there are things beginning to repeat themselves here. | |
| Larry in um Warika Lake, Oklahoma. | |
| Great to have you, sir, on the EIB network. | |
| Hello. | |
| Hi, Ross, thanks for taking my call. | |
| You bet. | |
| Look forward to tapping into your vast uh wisdom and knowledge. | |
| Uh ask for your analysis on a different perspective with story in the DOJ. | |
| I don't believe they are gonna investigate her. | |
| I believe they're gonna protect her. | |
| And here's why. | |
| We've got a federal judge that's serious about looking into her email situation with that server. | |
| And she just signed yesterday a document that may place her in perjury before that judge. | |
| A judge that her husband appointed. | |
| Now, what does this do for the administration? | |
| Well, when the reporters go in for the briefing of the White House and they ask Josh Ernest for a White House comment, what's he gonna say? | |
| We refer you to the Justice Department. | |
| When they go to the Justice Department to ask them questions about it, what are they gonna say? | |
| We don't discuss ongoing investigations. | |
| They investigated Lois Larner. | |
| What happened? | |
| The woman retired and she's receiving our tax dollars in her retirement pay every month. | |
| By the way, yeah, yeah, that's a whole nother story, by the way. | |
| Lois learner Found out that she did authorize one conservative group as tax exempt. | |
| Only one in those three years. | |
| Yeah, that's that's a good analogy. | |
| I understand that. | |
| Um, but there still is an impact, a news impact, even if there is a protection scheme that's unfolding here. | |
| Uh, and I'll have to detail why I still think it could harm her when I have more time, because we're out of it now. | |
| Off to a rousing start. | |
| Your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchor man and truth detector. |
Export Selection