All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 12, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:30
August 12, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, I thought I made myself clear in the last hour.
I warned you people, I'm not getting sucked into anything here when I see the Department of Justice is going to investigate Hillary Clinton and whatever follows her server, her emails.
I'm not, you don't have to, you don't have to tell me that that means Obama is going to investigate Hillary, which means that nothing's going to happen.
You never tell me that.
I understand.
I got loads of emails here.
Never thought you'd fall for the trick, Rush.
I never thought you'd fall for it.
I'm not falling for anything.
I'm telling you that it's all part.
It's one little part, one cog in the wheel that is the Hillary Clinton campaign.
We have a presidential candidate under criminal investigation.
Whether they do it in with it or not, time will tell.
We've not seen this.
The Democrat campaign itself, look at, we've got basically, we've got two people running and some pretenders.
And Walter O'Malley, sorry, Walter.
What's his name?
Martin O'Malley.
I keep thinking, Walter O'Malley, the Dodgers.
So you got Martin O'Malley out there.
He can't get any traction anywhere.
You've got Lurch thinking to get in.
Probably will Biden.
I don't think there's any doubt Biden's going to get in, depending on what they do.
And that could be why they're doing this DOJ stuff with Hillary, by the way.
Obama doesn't want her.
I'm convinced Obama doesn't want her messing with his legacy.
Okay, here's the way these people think.
Okay, here's Obama.
He's got two years.
In his mind, there's been no greater president.
Look at all the firsts.
Healthcare tried it for 200 years.
He got it.
Stop Iran getting a nuke.
I know it's not what happened.
That's the news, though.
He did it.
Got us out of Iraq.
It's all lies, but that's the legacy.
The media will write it for him.
What if Hillary comes along and does an even better job?
He's not going to permit that chance to happen.
Better job in terms of the way the Democrat media would write it up.
Worse job as far as all of us are concerned.
So you have Hillary, an aging, unappealing.
It's her turn kind of candidate.
Again, she is not exciting.
She's not charismatic.
She's not, I don't know what's friendly.
She doesn't have all the characteristics to say her husband has.
You never hear her describe the way he is.
He walks in the room, he owns it.
When he's talking to you, he makes you think you're the only one in the room.
Does anybody ever say that stuff about it?
Nobody does.
And we're finding out that those kind of characteristics do not transfer within a marriage.
Okay, so he may be the alpha male and the top dog and women melt or whatever it is they want to say.
None of that is ever said about Hillary.
Okay, there.
Over here, Bernie Sanders.
And by the way, Bernie Sanders, his polling data is not the only bad news for Hillary.
There's other bad news for her polling data in Iowa in terms of Republicans who now beat her.
Four different Republicans now beat her in Iowa.
So Iowa, New Hampshire, she is in a world of hurt.
4437, New Hampshire, Bernie Sanders, a Democrat Party, they tell us, a party of the young.
The party of the hip.
The party of the future.
The party of the millennials.
The party of cool.
Really?
You got an 80-year-old guy here tromping around, getting pushed off the stage by Black Lives Matter protesters.
And you got Mrs. Clinton who can't stay out of the crosshairs of the Department of Justice.
There's nothing young, cool, hip, futuristic about either of them.
Somebody want to explain this to me?
Meanwhile, on the Republican side, you've got diversity like the left claims to demand.
You've got youth.
You've got cool and hip in its own way.
And plus, you have all the great other attributes of conservatism, respect for the founding, and traditional American values and so forth.
I don't even see the contest here.
But particularly on the left, where you have all these people, Hollywood and everybody think that they own pop culture.
Where is that reflected in their presidential field?
Well, don't give me Lincoln Chafee wanted to change the metric system.
Give me a break.
Who even knows who Lincoln Chafee is?
Anyway, I just, I think nobody ever says that, but you're an average voter, whatever you look at at the way this is playing out.
I don't think there's the optics of the Democrat presidential campaign just don't do it.
The only thing fueling it, I think, on the left is hatred for us.
I think that's the primary energy driver on the Democrat campaign is hatred for conservatives, hatred for Republicans.
I don't think maybe the first woman president matters to some, but I don't think nearly like first black president mattered to a lot of people.
The first black president crossed all ethnic boundaries because you have here the original sin of slavery and everybody wants to wipe it out.
And everybody thought country admitting and electing a black president would be the greatest evidence anybody could ever have or see that we have erased our past.
And of course, who told you it would make it worse?
I did.
But there is no such similar thing about egging the first female president because there is no original sin in this country involving women.
Not like slavery.
I mean, you can't say suffrage or vote, whatever.
It's not even a factor anymore.
So, no.
I mean, there may be something strategic as far as the Democrats are concerned about wanting to have first female president because no criticism permitted.
It would be sexist.
And war on women.
But I'm just, I don't know.
I just look at the optics here, and I don't see in either Hillary or Bernie Sanders some of the characteristics a Democrat Party stands for.
Now, when you get to ideology, I mean, Bernie Sanders owns it with progressivism, uber leftism, and that is attractive to some people.
Anyway, the news for Hillary, in addition here to New Hampshire, 4437.
I'm telling you, it is shades of 2008.
And I don't think it's insignificant.
As I said, I was making a joke yesterday, but I think the joke, as in many jokes, makes it funny is it's got an element of truth to it.
Obama comes along and just wipes Hillary out.
And here comes Bernie Sanders doing that.
What's the common denominator, Hillary?
Before both campaigns were told she's just waiting to be coronated.
It's a fait accompli.
It's a done deal.
Except it wasn't.
100,000 people have attended Bernie Sanders' events this month.
That doesn't mean much.
Philip Bump in the Washington Post.
100,000 people have attended Bernie Sanders events this month.
It doesn't mean anything.
Okay.
Poll finds Hillary losing to four Republican candidates in Iowa.
Now, this is from the liberal polling bunch in North Carolina public policy polling.
But still, Hillary Clinton would lose state of Iowa to several potential Republican opponents.
She would lose to Marco Rubio.
She would lose to Scott Walker.
She would lose to Mike Huckabee.
And she would lose to Dr. Ben Carson in the public policy polling poll.
And it says here, this is from theHill.com, the results are likely to be of particular concern to Democrats given that President Obama carried Iowa handily in both of his elections.
Clinton is the dominant frontrunner in the race for the Democrat nomination.
Well, the Republicans have their own dogfight going on.
But when you get down to individual Republicans versus Hillary, there are four of them that wipe her out.
A recent survey by Quinnipiak showed Clinton trailing Republican candidates in Iowa, Colorado, and Virginia.
And then you have other polls suggest that her trust factor is weighed down.
So whether or not anything actually happens of a criminal nature involving her server and her emails, it is part of the drip, drip, drip of little news stories here and little news stories there that add up to doing great damage.
On the Donald Trump front, we finally have a poll, and the establishment is rejoicing.
We have a poll that shows Trump had a very significant increase in negatives after the debate last week.
I didn't put that on top here.
55% had negative opinion of Trump after the debate.
This story from the New York Times, I know, I know, New York Times, Donald J. Trump's erratic debate performance last week did not undo his standing as the favorite in Iowa, according to a poll released from Suffolk University yesterday, but it did damage the confidence that potential Republican caucus goers have in his ability to be president.
I think what this story is, I think this is the New York Times trying to get their readers walk back from the ledge.
I really think that a bunch of people read the New York Times are hanging over the edge from the top stories of their apartment buildings.
I mean, what was happening with their beloved mayor de Blasio, who is doing such a bad job, he won't even stay in town.
And the police commissioner is thinking, you know what?
20 years ago we cleaned this city up and this guy's just remaking a mess of it and I'm out of here.
That'd be Bill Bratton.
Plus they closed the lanes.
You know, so why stay?
The Suffolk survey found that Mr. Trump has the support of 17% of Republicans who planned a caucus in Iowa, Walker's at 12%, Rubio and Carson, then round out the top tour, top tier.
Now, while Trump has maintained his lead in Iowa, there were signs of weakness that could be problematic as his campaign carries on.
Of the 500 people surveyed here in the Suffolk poll, 55% Said that Mr. Trump's debate performance made them less comfortable with him as a candidate.
And 10% found that Trump is the most impressive debater.
So it was 55 problem.
10% thought he was great.
And it says here in the Times, quote, raising doubts about his contention, and he was the winner in last Thursday night's debate.
Never mind that he's gone up in every other poll.
The New York Times has to find the one where there's some bad news for Trump and herald it.
As I say, I need to keep their readers from jumping over the edge.
Donald Trump ripped into Bernie Sanders as weak because he allowed the Black Lives Matter group to hijack his microphone.
Trump said that would never happen.
He said, I would never give up my microphone.
I thought that was disgusting.
That showed such weakness.
It was in Seattle on Saturday, Sanders trying to give a speech.
Black Lives Matter group stormed the stage and took his microphone.
Where is the security?
Speaking of that, you know, I heard about this right before the program ended, this thing with the New York Jets.
This linebacker sucker punched supposedly to the starting quarterback, broke his jaw out six to ten weeks.
You know, there's a lot of questions about that.
Talk about security and so forth.
Brian, you follow this.
Have you seen anything?
Have you seen any news where other Jets players came to the defense of that quarterback?
Have you seen, you haven't?
I haven't either.
I haven't seen a single story that reports Jets players got mad that their starting quarterback was decked and attacked the guy who did it.
Revis, Darrell Rivas, quarterback, quarterback blames both the players.
Okay, fine.
But normally in a scrum like this, especially with the starting quarterback, if the guy's actually the leader of the team and has respect, the other players move in there and at least stand up for him, defend him, take the other guy out or do something separate.
I haven't heard one report of that.
Just an interesting little side like to me.
It doesn't mean anything in the big scheme of things.
Just a singular question.
Audio soundbites.
Don Lemon, CNN last night interviewing, it's a YouTube channel, these two babes, Lynette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson that we played the other day, who were upset the way Trump was treated in the debate.
Well, Don Lemon went out and found these two babes and had them on his show last night.
He said, you guys, wait a minute, didn't we have a story not long ago that women don't like to be called guys?
That that's sexist?
Some of you guys, well, here's Lemon.
Well, anyway.
He said, you guys, very passionate about your feelings about Donald Trump.
How did you decide that Trump was your guy?
Well, basically, I looked at the TV and saw that he was going to be running for the president.
And when I looked at him and I looked at his ideals and he was talking my language pretty much, I said, oh, my God, this is going to be our next president right here.
And I just felt it.
I knew it.
He resonated so well with me.
He resonated with me, too.
Listen, he said he was going to secure that border and then he's going to bring jobs back to Americans.
So that means that Americans not only are going to just be surviving, but they're going to be able to thrive in this country, Don.
And that's what I love.
He is going to make America great again.
Oh, yes.
He is going to make America great.
And that's why I stopped for the Trump.
Say what it is.
Oh, yes, he is.
Oh, MG, these two women symbolize, I think, an unreported, overwhelming problem for the Democrat Party.
And I must take a brief timeout.
Sit tight, my friends.
We got much more.
By the way, folks, Jets fans looking at Geno Smith, the starting quarterback, being out 6, 10 weeks.
Jets fans do not look at it in terms of being out 6, 10 weeks.
They say Geno's out between 18 and 30 interceptions.
They do.
I know it's cold.
I know it's called, but it's true.
I mean, Jets fans, Jets fans are a different, different breed.
I mean, they go in knowing that no matter what, they're never going to be normal.
Ever.
No matter who's there, something is going to happen.
Now, back to these two babes here, Lynette Hardaway, Rochelle Richardson, CNN last night.
Did you hear them?
Did you hear them start telling Don Lemon why they liked the Trumpster?
Every reason they gave was specific to an issue.
And of course, the establishment's out there saying Trump is going to fall flat on his face, eventually rush because he's not getting serious about anything.
He doesn't specify anything.
You ask him for his position on this and he obfuscates it.
He starts talking about their people insulting him.
He never gets specific.
Well, these babes think he is.
Guarantee you to Lynette Hardaway, Rochelle Richardson, they start, he's going to bring jobs back to America.
He's going to make America great again.
He is going to close the border.
He's going to fix immigration.
His country is going to thrive again.
They hear specifics.
Now, let's move to the next soundbites.
It's a montage from yesterday and last night from a bunch of it's a cross-section of drive-by media people and conservative analysts with the new reason.
And there is a new reason every day or two about why Trump is eventually going to implode.
This one is the reason he can't win and why he will implode is that he does not give specifics.
Trump, who has been very light on specifics.
He has not come out with specifics.
He's not talking specifics on policy.
On most tricky policy issues, he can't give specifics.
Got to talk about the policy specifics.
He offers no specifics.
He didn't want to go anywhere on the specifics.
Long on rhetoric, but short on specifics.
He has no specifics.
Getting to Trump is getting at the specifics and the policy.
The devil are in the details for Donald Trump, and I think that's ultimately his downfall.
Why, here we go again.
Why, when Cheney was named Bush's VEP, it was gravitas.
They, every damn, we must have had 35 different media people that all used the word gravitas to describe Bush's choice of Cheney.
And now, it's not 30 people here, but it's a bunch of them, and they are no specifics, no specifics.
Last night, Birch Run, Michigan, Trump held a press conference.
Question, we haven't heard a lot of specifics.
I talked to people outside the venue today.
They said, where's the meat on the bone?
When are you going to tell us your specifics?
You're going to see lots of plans.
Also, and you have to understand, when you're coming up with a plan in business, you have to be flexible.
There's got to be flexibility.
And I recently bought something, not so recently, but Doral in Miami.
Everybody wanted it.
If I would have sat down and said, here's a 12-point plan in order to get Dural, I didn't do that.
I went in and punched and punched and beat the hell out of people, and I ended up getting it.
Everybody wanted it.
All of the smart money wanted it.
I know how to get things done.
You can't sit down and say, well, I'm going to come up with a 19-point plan to get the old post office and create it into a great hotel on Pennsylvania Avenue.
The most sought-after property, I think, in the history of the General Services Administration.
Trump got it.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
You never know what a liberal is going to call and get through here.
Rush Limbaugh at 800-282-2882.
Here is Shane in Miami.
Shane, great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hey, Rush.
I wanted to respond to what you were saying about Hillary and the Democrat Party.
And I think it speaks to why Trump is resonating with a lot of millennials right now.
With millennials like myself, our whole lives we've been bombarded with sharing and teamwork.
And you can't always do everything by yourself.
You need to have someone there with you.
Don't have unrealistic expectations.
And here comes Trump saying, I'm really rich.
And, you know, when I hear him say that, I'm so glad that someone's able to say, you know what?
I'm proud of how much I've achieved.
And you can achieve that too.
That's inspiring for a lot of millennials.
Their whole lives we've been taught, you know, not only don't pursue being wealthy, but why would you want to be?
Wealthy people are evil.
They're mean.
And, you know, you should be ashamed of success almost.
And that's really what the Democrat Party represents.
And I'm just so glad that we finally have a Republican not running away from their wealth like Romney, you know, almost like ashamed of it.
Like, oh, I don't really have that much money.
Here comes Trump.
I'm really rich.
That is almost the same thing as hip-hop artists.
If you look at hip-hop music, and I'm not really a big fan of it, but it's very popular with millennials.
Essentially, what the theme is, the central theme in all of hip-hop music is just bragging about success and coming up from MTV, they still do, but they used to have a show where hip-hoppers and athletes would welcome you into their crib so they could brag about how big it was and how much stuff they had in it and how cool it was.
But, you know, you have hit on something that is right on the money and it has fascinated me.
And I've even referenced it on this program a couple times in the past couple years.
And when I first saw, there was a story out of San Francisco how millennials have no interest in automobiles.
They don't want to buy a car.
They don't want to own anything.
And then I started seeing stories about how they don't want to own anything.
And the sharing economy is booming because millennials don't like to be tied to ownership.
They love sharing, even their digs, even their places they live.
They like ride sharing, i.e. Uber.
And it was presented as these people are way ahead of the curve.
This is the future of America.
Nobody's going to own anything.
Nobody's going to have the money to own anything.
Nobody wants the hassle of owning it.
Nobody wants to have to pay the insurance for owning anything.
Everybody's going to have a want to share it.
I always thought that this was a meme, if you will, put forth by a bunch of socialists who are trying to preach the virtue of sameness and equal outcomes and nobody having more than anybody else and everybody sharing what they had.
But the problem that I saw was that the millennials, as it was reported, buying into it.
And you're telling me that that's not the case, that you're not crazy about being told to share everything.
And by the way, one of the reasons the sharing economy has become so prominent, correct me if I'm wrong, is that you're told the nation's best economic days are behind us, that there is no great American economic future anymore.
Everybody's just going to have to do with less and share and so forth.
And I've always got the impression that millennials bought into that, accepted it, and liked it.
You're telling me that when a guy like Trump's come along or Trump comes along, brags about his wealth and his achievement, that it is inspiring to other millennials?
That they want a piece of that themselves now, you're saying?
Yeah, that is true.
And I think it's the same thing as we see with, okay, so people tend to think that America is more liberal than it is because the media is majority liberal.
That's why people think that America is more liberal than it really is.
Media doesn't represent all of America.
And so I don't think that, you know, young liberal celebrities and those that are really active on social media that tend to get the most attention, they don't represent the majority of millennials.
And Trump has tapped into the silent majority, not just of people in America in general, but specifically millennials, the silent majority of millennials who really don't pay attention to politics because they're turned off by the Mitt Romneys, the John McCains.
And it's just boring for them.
And Trump has brought excitement, and he's saying things that they can understand in their language.
And that's what you were talking about earlier.
You were saying how, you know, you can't have a 19-point plan that needs to be flexible.
Well, not only that, but people who want to sit down, especially millennials, are not going to sit down and listen to a 19-point economic plan.
But if Trump comes out and says, Jeb Bush is weak on immigration, we understand that.
That's pretty simplistic.
We can understand that.
But I think that it really just goes back to the fact that we've been constantly bombarded with this our whole lives, and we're sick of it.
We're sick of being told that, you know, you have to share everything.
You're sick of being told to lower your expectations on business.
Yes.
Yes.
And that, you know, it's unrealistic for you to think that you could ever be rich.
And why would you want it to be anyway?
Rich people are snobs.
Yeah, you know, it used to be, and Shane, it wasn't that long ago.
Honestly, I wouldn't lie to you.
It used to be thought that becoming wealth was a sign that somebody was doing something right.
Yeah.
Well, you know, Ben Shapiro, actually, I'm a big fan of his, and he had touched on this before, too.
And he says that the thing about millennials, because he's a millennial also, he says that, you know, it used to be the case that if a father and his son were walking down the street and they saw a guy driving a nice car down the street, the father would turn to his son and he'd say, you know, there's a guy who works hard.
That guy, he's driven.
And if you work hard enough, son, you can be successful just like him.
Now, you see the guy driving a nice car, people think, gee, look at that guy driving that nice car.
Why does he need to have that?
You know what?
Let's follow him home, and then when he goes in his house, we'll throw a rock at the car.
You know, we'll key the car.
Or worse than that, who did he rip off to get that car?
Or something.
I remember, you're right.
When I was growing up, when I was in my teenage years and approaching the age of 16, which was back then, that's when you got your driver's license.
My dad actually started, if you could have any car in the world, what would you want?
It wasn't lower your expectations, son.
You're never going to be able to, what would you like, son?
He wasn't offering to get me.
He just wanted to find out what I was thinking.
If you could have whatever you wanted, what would it be?
We talked about it with no guilt about it.
It was obviously fantasy time.
I'm 15 years old.
I'm never going to back then be the kind of car I want.
But it was pointed, the attitude that accompanied it was one of anticipation.
Work hard, you might be able to get it.
But it was a possibility is the point.
It was a legitimate, genuine possibility.
It wasn't something to be ashamed of.
It wasn't something to be critical of.
It wasn't something that said something negative about somebody to have such aspirations.
And those are all true today.
The greater aspirations you have, the more selfish it is assumed you are, and the less you care about others.
And I think these stigmatizations have been successfully attached to people in your generation.
How have you avoided being caught up with it all?
You know what?
I think it was just that I've always been someone who has embraced individualism.
I always hated working in groups.
And constantly throughout school, teachers would say, you know, get in your groups.
And so as a group, you would get a grade.
And so it didn't matter if you did a lot of work and no one else did.
And I always hated that.
And I think that a lot of people are like me that hated that, but they were just pushed into it.
And I really myself had just constantly resisted it.
I was naturally a more independent person, but I could see that other people felt the same way as me.
They just weren't really saying anything about it.
And specifically millennial men, I think Trump has tapped into something with millennial men as well.
And that is with not being politically correct.
We've been taught as men, as millennial men, you can't offend women.
Don't say anything offensive, you know, and don't hold the door open for them.
That's sexist.
You know, you may be on something here.
And if you are, I really hope you're right.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, we're just tired of, you know, I mean, you go to college campuses now.
You have to almost be afraid of women if you're a guy because, you know, they might accuse you of rape or sexual harassment or might get sued by somebody just for asking her out.
You don't even have to be there to be accused of rape.
Exactly.
Lena Donovan accused somebody who wasn't even there.
And wrote a book about it.
Yeah, and here comes Trump, and he's just like, you know what?
I'm not going to take any of this garbage.
If you're going to accuse me of sexual harassment in front of millions of people in the debate, as Matt A. Telly pretty much did, she accused them of sexual harassment, completely taken out of context.
But he says, you know what?
I'm not going to put up with this political correctness.
And he pushed back.
And I think that is inspiring for millennial men.
They want someone who's able to say, I'm going to push back, and this is what you need to do.
You don't just have to sit there and take it by Nattress Girl at Columbia or whoever it is.
You don't have to take this crap.
You can push back.
This might be really, really, he might really be onto something here, folks, in terms of why not just millennials, but other people.
I guarantee you that the establishment of both parties is trying to figure out what it is Trump's doing that's working.
And so that's why they come up with, well, you know, he's not getting specific.
He's speaking platitudes.
He's going to buy him out.
This is a bragging rich guy with bad hair.
And I think you've offered some specifics here.
Trump is a living example that anti-PC is cool.
Anti-PC is successful.
Anti-PC is fun.
And that you don't have to shell act in it and be put in prison with it and so forth.
If you're right, it'll counter because I guarantee you, Shane, a lot of people believe that millennials want to be PC.
They want to be the way they are.
And that they're leading the movement to be that way.
And what you're saying is that a lot of them don't and are looking for reasons to break out.
And Trump offers an example of how you can break out and prosper and be liked, which is what a lot of people want to be.
So I appreciate your call.
I really thank you for taking the time here to get through.
I really do.
All right.
Oh, I'm sorry, hung up.
Too bad.
Quick timeout, folks.
Back with more in just a second.
Don't go away.
Talent on loan from God.
Welcome back, folks.
Your guiding light, Rush Limbaugh.
Of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, and even the good time.
Here on the EIB network, telephone number is 800-282-2882 and the email address, Elrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Get this.
Cybercast News Service.
California.
We are so, I mean, folks, either that state, and I love it, I love California.
Everywhere I've been, I've been to Humboldt County.
I've been up there fighting Earth First.
I've been to Mendocino County.
I have been to the Bay Area.
I've been to Southern California.
I've been to the Central Valley, the San Joaquin Valley.
I've been in the Sierra Nevada Mountains.
I've been to San Diego.
I love that state.
But man, is it messed up?
California has become the first state in the nation to agree to pay for a transgender prison inmates sex reassignment surgery on the basis of medical necessity.
Rodney James Quine, 56, who since 1980 has been serving a life sentence without parole for murder, kidnapping, and robbery, has been diagnosed with severe gender dysphoria.
Last Friday, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation conceded in court that sex reassignment surgery was the only way to treat Quine's condition.
Now, stop and think of that.
Of course, maybe this guy is smarter than we think.
I mean, if you're faced with life in prison the rest of your life, maybe you would want to spend it in a woman's prison.
I'm just being jocular, my friends.
Well, I mean, there's something to that.
I mean, that's the whole thing.
What if he keeps his, that's the deal?
You know, sex reassignment surgery is not necessarily the chop a dick off of me.
Nor is it necessarily addedictomy.
You can, that's right.
That's, well, because he's going to, I don't know that he's going to go to a women's prison.
I'm just saying that maybe he would be transferred to a women's prison after having undergone the sex reassignment surgery.
But the state has diagnosed that's the only thing we're talking about.
I can't even say it because I would be offending people, but we're talking about treating mental illness with mental illness.
And I'm trying to be kind about this.
But the point is the state taxpayers are going to pay for this.
Now, I know they're not going to get a bill.
When I hear the taxpayers, the taxpayers don't have the slightest idea what they're paying for.
If they got a bill for everything proportionate, whatever the state's doing, it they cost, it might make a difference, might have an impact.
Here's Bob in Glenwood, Illinois.
Bob, great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, thanks for taking my call.
It's one of your listeners.
I have two parts to why I called.
First part, you may have touched Base on a little bit while I was on hold, and that's Hillary Clinton.
I remember back in April, I don't know the events for the QA, but she was asked about the server and the emails, and her response was very quick and to the point that nothing she received or sent was classified.
Right.
Then I believe it was in June she was asked again that question.
And this is where I think she was instructed to add three words.
Her answer was there were no emails that were received or sent on my server that were classified at that time.
And those are the three key words.
And I believe that's for out.
I believe she was instructed to say that because they knew they were going to confiscate her server.
I do not trust liberals.
I think they're going to be the ones who are looking at her server.
And no matter what they find and what they dig up, that's going to be their response when all this comes out, whenever that may be, that at the time that she sent or received anything, nothing.
Okay, look, if you think that, if the liberals are going to be the ones looking at a server and therefore nothing is going to be found that's incriminating, then why are they even going through the motions here, do you think?
I think they're going through the motions to save her.
I think they're going through the motions to help her out.
I think they're going through the motions to try and get her back in the fold here.
They don't want Sanders there.
Except the problem is, it's liberals who have released all this news that we know about.
It's the liberals who've told us what was on Hillary's server.
It's the liberals who've proven in the regime who have proven that Hillary lied.
And yet now the theory is that it's liberals trying to save her.
We wouldn't be here if liberals hadn't spilled beans on this woman and her server in the first place, i.e., Democrats of the DOJ.
But I think your theory has some plausibility, nevertheless.
Got to take a break, though, because I'm out of busy broadcast time at the moment, folks.
Sit tight.
We're coming right back.
What, a new beta today?
Well, maybe.
Maybe an El Capitan beta, but not an iOS 9 beta, no.
Maybe El Capitan.
They'd do it for one of those.
I hope.
Anyway, folks, hang in there, be tough.
Another exciting, busy broadcast hour is just moments away.
▲
Export Selection