All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
October 28, 2014, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back.
It's great to have you, Rush Limboy here, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network at the Limboy Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I'm told that there is a news story.
I don't know.
I don't know the source yet.
I just I just got a heads up that something's coming.
And it's another one of these drive-by media stories on um African American voters turning on Democrats.
I don't know any more than that.
I'm I'm waiting for this to actually be delivered to me.
But I was uh relatively confident enough that this is the detail in order to tease you with it.
But that's all I know.
I don't know any more.
I don't know where, I don't know what campaign, I don't know, I don't know anything other than that.
But it's uh it's like the other day, well, maybe two weeks ago, I had a heads up on an AP story that was going to be coming down the pike at four o'clock.
I forget what it was about.
Uh, but I got a heads up on it before it was embargoed, and I said, what the heck?
I don't care.
And I I teased the um subject man, it turned out to be right on the money.
I can't remember what it was about.
It had to do something with the campaign.
Anyway, when it hits, uh, and depending on what it is, I would of course pass on all these details.
Telephone number if you want to be with us today, 800 282-2882 in the email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
Let's turn to Ebola for just a second here.
The New York, I'm sorry, the Washington Post has a uh story.
No unity over Ebola monitoring of travelers.
No consistent leadership.
A chaotic brawl.
States going their own way.
Governor Christie claims I'm not kowtowing to anybody.
I'm using a common sense approach that the federal government wasn't taking.
I'm not sitting around waiting for them.
You don't need to quarantine me.
Like Rush Limbaugh suggested, it was a jocular lighthearted moment when I suggested quarantining Governor Christie.
Actually, we need to quarantine Klain.
Actually, he may be in quarantine.
Is anybody seen the guy?
You know what Ron Klain's doing?
Ron Klain is the author of the attacks on Christie and Cuomo.
Ron Klain's a politician.
Ron Klain's a fundraiser, and he's a spender.
He's good at spreading the walking around money around.
But he's not a science guy.
He's not a health guy.
The Bolazar doesn't know anything about Ebola.
He handles the politics of it.
Because folks with everything, everything, the Democrat Party, Obama, you know, it's all politics.
Everything about everything is measured in terms of will it help or hurt Obama and how much can it help or hurt Obama.
And here in the in this Washington Post story, actually allude to the fact you can't criticize the president election year.
This is unseemly.
A governor to do that, criticizing Christie for criticizing Obama.
How dare you don't do this in an election year?
We need unity on this.
There isn't any unity.
And there isn't any unity because we don't have any leadership coming down the pike from Washington.
Washington wants everybody to listen to them, but they don't have any unity.
Try this, folks.
This is uh from Fox News, a top Republican Congressman claims.
The Obama administration is exploring plans to bring non-U.S.
citizens infected with Ebola to the United States for treatment.
This Bob Goodlett, Republican Virginia, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee told Fox News that his office has received information from within the regime that these plans are being developed.
So far, only American Ebola patients have been brought back to the U.S. for treatment from the disease epicenter in West Africa.
Goodlatt warned that expanding that policy could put the country at more risk.
Makes perfect sense to me if you're gonna have amnesty, if you're gonna go to Amnesty 9 million to 34 million illegals if you're not gonna shut the sort southern border.
If if you're going to do all of that, then why wouldn't you bring Ebola patients to the United States?
And can I hearken back to that guest on C and I can never remember this guy's name?
The author of the Ebola book has said we can't turn our backs on Liberia.
With our past, with our slave past, we can't turn our backs on them.
I can never remember this clown's name.
Kwaman, that's it.
Quaman, as in Kwanzit Hut.
Quaman, that's how I'll remember it.
Quanzit Hut.
And I think his first name was Bob, doesn't matter.
But he's he's written this book about Ebola upside down, left and right, inside out, whatever, and we don't dare turn our backs on people.
What what in the world do we think?
Why would we bring patients in?
I thought we had to contain it over there.
Does the CDC guy not know what the regime is planning?
The CDC guy says, no, no, no, no.
No, no, no.
We can't ban flights from there because we gotta contain the disease there.
Right, that makes a lot of sense.
We're not gonna ban flights so that we can contain it.
That's right.
We gotta contain this.
We can't ban flights because then we couldn't get our aid workers in.
Really?
How have you and we couldn't get them out?
Charters?
The troops, troops got in and out.
We get into disaster areas in and out without commercial.
What the hell is this?
So the CDC guy is saying, no, no, no, we can't, we can't let we can't ban flights because we gotta be able to get over there.
We gotta contain the disease in Africa.
And now the regime's thinking about bringing Ebola patients from Africa into America?
No, why would you do that?
What possible thought process could you have?
What would be your objective?
What do you what why would you do this?
Now, Goodlat said, members of the media, my office have received confidential uh communication saying that those plans are being developed.
Plans the regime is developing to bring Ebola patients in Africa, non-citizens to America.
This is simply a matter of common sense that if you are concerned about this problem spreading, and this is a deadly disease, that we're even concerned about the great health care workers when they come back and not spreading it, that we are going to transfer, we shouldn't be bringing in these patients?
Why would you do this?
Compassion?
Really?
Uh how many people we talking about bringing now?
I mean, if they're really thinking of this, last count I heard there were 8,000 infected, 4,000 some odd men.
Maybe a little more have died.
So what would that mean?
4,000 patients still there?
How are we going to choose which ones come?
Are we going to bring them all?
On a lottery?
Bring them all?
That would mean chartering flights.
How are you going to do that?
8,000, 4,000.
Ah, that's right.
The military, a bunch of C5As, a bunch of C17s.
There you go.
See those military troops all yeah, we can we can take them off the Boko Haram detail.
You heard about that?
That hashtag, by the way, working great.
30 more kids kidnapped.
This time.
Little boys and little girls kidnapped this time by Boko Haram.
The hashtag bring back our girls.
I don't think it's working.
I think Boko Haram has a hashtag, need more boys.
They took some.
I'm not kidding.
I'm not making this up.
Remember how we had the hashtag and everybody thought it would meaningful?
And I got raked over the calls for having no compassion for pointing out that this was a silly measure.
I mean, it might have made people engage and it feel better, but it wasn't going to accomplish it, it wasn't going to get the girls back, a hashtag on Twitter.
Anyway, so now Bob Goodlat claims the regime may be seriously thinking of bringing non-citizens to the U.S. for Ebola treatment.
Okay, look, since the regime Does everything with a political point attached to it?
Could this be about the African American vote?
I mean, they can't get them here soon.
But could just the announcement that we're thinking of, could that be a signal to the African American vote of solidarity for Mom, but why else would you do this?
From whom do you want the compassion?
I mean, okay, you're doing it for compassion.
Therefore, you want people to say, oh man, look at Obama, how much compassion.
Who do you want saying that?
What's the benefit?
And there's all there has to be a benefit of not going to do it.
Could it be?
No.
No, it can't be.
It can't be that.
It it it can't be a policy rooted in fairness, meaning it's not fair since Liberia does exist because of us.
It's not fair.
And only they have it.
So since they've got it, we have got to treat them.
Who thinks like that?
Everybody who is full-on politically correct thinks this way.
That's the point.
If slavery is responsible for Liberia, and Liberia has a lot of cases of Ebola, then the politically correct would conclude that if we had never had slavery, there wouldn't be a Liberia, and therefore Liberians wouldn't exist, and therefore they wouldn't have Ebola.
So Ebola is traceable to U.S. slavery.
And we've got a guy who's written a book that says that.
It's not me.
We've got a guy, CNN guest, who said this.
Okay, so since that would not be fair, since it's our responsibility, maybe it is then our responsibility to treat them.
Since, I mean, this is how the politically correct think.
If you are a devout, politically correct thinker, one of the requirements is that the United States is guilty.
I mean, that's why there is political correctness.
The U.S. is guilty.
The U.S. is responsible.
The U.S. is to blame.
them.
For all of the success, the disadvantages others have, the poverty they have, and the wealth that we have, it's all our fault.
Political correctness is designed to end judgment, inequality, unfairness, and to address grievances stemming from all of them.
Hillary said who about Bill Clinton.
Let's think about that.
Mr. Snerdley has reminded me that there was a genocide in uh Rwanda.
The Tutsis and the Hutu's went at it.
And one of them ended up being wiped out.
I forget which the Hutu's and the Tutsis, I don't remember which.
It happened when Clinton was president.
And he discussed the guilt that he felt and the culpability responsibility, because we didn't do anything.
And uh he did say that he wished he had a do-over vis-a-vis Rwanda.
And so what would the do-over have been?
What would he or did he really just not really want to do over?
He was just saying he wanted to do over so that people would think he's a good guy and was really suffering and in pain over what happened and so forth.
Anyway, who knows why, but the regime is planning, they're considering bringing non-citizens to the United States for treatment.
I gotta take a quick time out here of my friends and gather all of my thoughts, because I'm um you realize this only makes sense in a couple of scenarios, and we don't want to consider those scenarios.
And we're back.
Great to have you, Rush Limboard, the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Let me advance a theory.
Why would Obama somebody in the regime tell somebody in Congress or leak it or whatever that the regime was considering bringing Ebola patients from West Africa to the United States?
What if the answer to that is this?
What if what Obama's trying to do is is uh cause Republicans to react in outrage and anger.
So that Obama and the media can then say, look at these mean all we're trying to do is help these people are suffering from Ebola.
We're the world superpower.
We have the best ability to treat them.
President Obama cares.
He's just thinking about maybe bringing some here to and look at those Republicans with no compassion, mean spirited, maybe that's the objective.
Wouldn't put it past them.
That would be their equivalent, if you will, of trying to find the next Todd Aiken.
Which the Democrats are constantly on the lookout for.
Some Republican candidates say some embarrassing um thing.
Now, this this story about black activists trashing and dumping a Democrat Party.
It's out of Chicago.
It is Chicago activists.
It's a video.
It's just been posted uh by Drudge on his home page.
And I've got the eager staff working on putting that video together so I can share it with you.
But here are some quotes from the video.
And all I know is these are Chicago political activists.
And they're fed up.
They're fed up with the Democrat Party.
My life has been hurt by Democrats.
Everything wrong in our community is under Democrats.
Black leadership's abusing us.
Democrat leadership is abusing us.
We want an opportunity to own businesses.
It's a it's a long rant.
It runs four minutes.
It's four or five black men just taking down the Democrat Party.
They're urging people to vote.
They don't they don't tell them who or how to vote, but they are dumping all over the Democrat Party.
Here's some more quotes.
Black folks are in an abusive black leadership relationship.
Look and see in your community who the real oppressors are.
Black unblack crime is blacks voting against our interest.
Blacks are running Detroit.
White people not doing that.
Minimum wage is a joke when you don't have any jobs.
They've forced us into a life of welfare.
Well, no.
This this may be in a category too good to be true.
I mean, this is the kind of thing I was expecting.
This should have been well, I'm not gonna look at gift horse in the mouth.
I you just no, I'm I'll take it for what it is.
I want to go to the phones.
Well, no, all I'm gonna say is, you know, I've over the course of these 25 years, I've asked openly, when is it gonna dawn on people that the people they're counting on are making their lives worse?
When's it gonna dawn on them?
It may have here in Chicago.
We'll see.
In the meantime, this is Lisa in uh in Kathleen, Georgia.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet.
I am so angry with this nurse from Maine, uh, Casey Hickot.
Yes.
She complains about being inconvenienced and she has no idea.
The sacrifice, the inconvenience, uh, that we military go through.
My husband's 24 years retired military.
My future son-in-law is in his on his third tour in Afghanistan right now.
We're not sure when he's coming home.
And when I hear people like her, who I consider a prima donna, uh, complaining about how inconvenient she was because she had to sit in a tent meet a granola bar when my husband sat for two weeks in a hangar eating MREs waiting to be deployed.
They they don't have a clue.
They use the military when they need them for an emergency or like I can't believe they sent our troops to the Ebola region, but any other time they don't want to have anything to do with us, we get terrible Uh VA care, uh, whenever they cut military budget, it's what goes to families or the service member, you know, it and I am so angry about it.
And every time I see something on the TV, if my TV weren't so expensive, I think I'd have thrown something about the TV.
But um, and you're um going out today to get your new book because um I don't have it, my kids are twenty-five and twenty-eight.
I don't have any grandkids yet, April, I think, and I'm going to pick up your book because even now, today, with my children at their age, when they were young, my husband was gone all the time.
He was a flying crew chief and everything that came down the pike he volunteered for, so he was always gone.
My kids come to me even now for big when they have to make big life decisions, they talk to me about it, not their dad, because I think they got closer to me growing up because he was always gone.
I mean, they have a good relationship with their father.
You know, they he's the one they go to the movies with or play cards with or sit and kid around with, but when it's life decisions, they come to me.
And I I really feel that that's because he was gone so much and he depended so much on me when they were.
I totally understand that, but I tell you, just having talked to you for a couple of minutes here.
I think your kids are in great hands.
I think I think your kids have a gold mine in you.
Well, thank you.
My kids are wonderful.
This nurse, this nurse is a hard core Obama supporter, and as such is classically spoiled.
Oh, yeah.
And that's why she hasn't the slightest bit of understanding about what you and your family have done or do.
Sticking with the phones.
Truth detector, doctor of democracy, all combined in one harmless, flubbable little fuzzball bundle.
And this is Joe in West Seneca, New York.
I'm glad you called Joe.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Mr. Limbaugh, it's a pleasure.
I can't believe I got through.
You made my day.
Here you are.
Uh I got a burning question.
I've had it, and I figure you're the only one who's gonna give me an honest answer.
Hillary Clinton.
Where does she have the hutzpa to think that she's qualified for the the highest office in the country?
She has no accomplishments.
And yet everybody's, you know, buzzing about her.
I'm in New York, so I'm in a blue state.
Well, wait a minute, neither did Obama.
That's another one.
Is it they're gonna be back to back catastrophes?
I mean, when she was the first lady.
Now there's an answer to your question, though.
The answer, why does she think she's qualified?
There's two things.
First one and foremost, arrogance.
Yes.
Arrogance and conceit.
Second, she is owed it by the Democrat Party.
She is owed it.
It was hers.
It was hers in 2008, and she was robbed.
She didn't campaign as hard as she should have in 2008 because she thought it was hers to be coronated.
It was hers because she is owed for everything she did in sticking in, standing by Bill Clinton.
If she had left, if she had turned tail and ran, it would have ended his political career and the Democrat Party went ahead big doo-doo.
But she hung in there and she ran the bimbo eruptions unit, and she did everything she could to keep that man in office and to keep him as clean as possible, and for that she is owed.
And she's owed way before that.
She is owed for for leaving her own life way, way back in uh at Wellesley and getting married to this guy and going to Arkansas and putting up with him philandering while she's at the Rose Law Firm.
She's been owed this, and that's why she is running.
The third reason is she is an avowed Olinskyite leftist, and they are driven.
They are driven by the idea that this country is fraudulent and illegitimate, and it must be transformed.
And I am not exaggerating in one syllable.
That's why she's running.
All of those reasons combined.
Well, thank you, sir.
I appreciate it.
That because the qualifications have nothing to do with it.
Obviously, they don't.
In the television age, qualifications change.
Obama didn't have any, but he made a great speech.
So did Mario the Pious.
But Mario the Pious never really pulled a trigger on the White House.
He kind of dipped his foot in there but didn't go all the way in.
Obama all kinds of surface characteristics about him that made him unbeatable.
And he didn't have to have any qualifications.
Obama was such that timing couldn't have been better.
The Democrats had ginned up all this hatred for Bush and the Republicans.
And here came Obama on the heels of that speech.
And look what people thought he was going to do.
He was a messiah.
He was going to fix everything.
Everybody's going to love everybody.
The first time in world history there wouldn't be any terrorism.
There wasn't going to be any war.
There wasn't going to be any acrimony.
There's going to be nothing but everybody getting along.
Everybody's going to be equal.
It was going to be fair.
There weren't going to be any poor people.
And that's why there's so much disappointment.
These people actually, some of these people who voted for Obama really truly sincerely believed that was all going to happen.
They desperately want it to happen, wanted it to happen, still do.
Mrs. Clinton will be the next last great hope.
The Democrats will look at her the same way they looked at Obama.
First black president can't be criticized.
Any criticism, chalked up to racism.
Democrats will be immune.
Republicans won't dare criticize Hillary, first female president, any criticism feminist, feminist attacking, uh, anti-woman, war on woman.
Republicans therefore will shut up.
Let Hillary get away with whatever she wants, because they'll be scared to death to criticize her.
That's Democrats' game plan.
But there's a problem.
As I mentioned in the first hour, the Democrats have created.
I don't know it's by accident or by design.
And I don't, I don't know how long lasting it is, but they have created a deranged voter base.
They have created, created a delusional bunch of people that comprise their primary voter base.
They have fed these people with undiluted raw hatred and rage and anger.
Actually, since 2000, since the Florida recount, you could actually go back before that, but the intense hatred and rage.
The really focused hatred and rage.
Started with the Florida recount and it just kept on and kept on and it peaked during the Iraq war.
As such, they've created an insane bunch of voters who demand to keep hearing this rage and hatred because they felt some of it themselves anyway.
Democrats came along and validated it.
Mrs. Clinton was right in there, Obama was right.
All of them, Harry Reid, you name it, Nancy Pelosi, they've all done it, and they've created this deranged base.
So Mrs. Clinton goes out.
And in her competition with Elizabeth Warren, who also is rumored to be seeking a Democrat Party presidential nomination in 2016.
Elizabeth Warren goes out and says, You didn't build that, business owner.
Factory owner, you didn't build that.
We all made that happen for you.
You had nothing to do with that.
You're just a thief.
You're stealing from us.
We made that.
You didn't build that.
Okay, Mrs. Clinton has to compete, so she's in Massachusetts.
She says, small business corporations didn't create jobs.
Everybody knows they don't create jobs.
There's no way.
Don't let anybody tell you that, you know, it's corporations and businesses that create jobs.
That old theory trickle down economics.
It's been tried.
That's failed.
It's failed rather spectacularly.
Her base loved it.
They cheered it, except Hillary is profoundly embarrassed.
She has to walk it back now.
From a desperate to help out politico.
Hillary Clinton on Monday mopped up her botched statement from a rally in man.
It was not botched.
She intended to say it.
She doesn't believe it, but she has to say it, which is my point.
She has to say it because they have created a genuine lunatic fringe as their primary voter base.
Her main competition was a woman who says equally inane things.
That the Democrat Party base loves.
And by the way, this deranged lunatic Base is made up of college professors who teach their classrooms this crap.
I mean, this is not just pajama boys in the basement posting anonymously on the Democrat underground.
This is supposedly sophisticated college professors and stuff teaching this crap.
That you didn't build that, that businesses don't create jobs, that only government can do that fairly and justly and blah blah.
So they've got to service that demand, if you will.
That's who shows up in primaries.
They've got to serve.
So that's what Hillary was trying to do.
And now she stepped in it.
And here's the political trying to help her out.
Hillary Clinton on Monday mopped up her botched statement from a rally in Massachusetts last week, making it clear that she'd misspoken and she hadn't intended to deliver a fresh economic policy message.
Now, if you watch the video, it is clear she's reading from a teleprompter.
And she's wringing her hands leading up to it.
She's excited about it.
She wants to say this.
She intended to say this.
So maybe the teleprompter misspoke.
The only thing botched about her statement was that somebody else heard it.
The only thing botched about this statement was that she got caught making it.
Back to the politico.
Clinton's cleanup came as she campaigned with Representative Sean Patrick Maloney in Summers.
About 90 minutes north of New York City after two days in which Republicans bandied the likely White House candidates Friday comment, made in the context of talking about trickle down economics on social media, and a single sentence began gaining traction.
Oh, so she misspoke and she was taken out of context.
Well, that's the perfect duo.
She misspoke and was taken out of context.
She said, don't let anybody tell you that corporations and businesses create jobs.
And you know who else was there?
Elizabeth Warren was also there.
That's right.
She appeared on behalf of gubernatorial candidate Martha Cookley, along with Senator Elizabeth Warren, a populist, anti-big bank crusader who's become the wished for candidate for some progressives of 2016.
Exactly, and she had this crowd going.
Elizabeth Warren was feeding them this red meat, and Hillary is watching this, and she had to get in on it, so she intended to say this.
And the crowd was eating this stuff up.
So now Hillary, after giving the crowd what it wanted, is now out there saying, I didn't mean that, is not going to help her with this lunatic base.
Hillary, you know what Hillary could say?
Okay.
If she really wants to walk this back.
I'm sorry.
I was reading from Elizabeth's prepared remarks.
They put hers on the teleprompter.
Those were her words, not mine.
She should try that.
Welcome back.
El Rushbo serving humanity simply by showing up now.
Now, folks, I did not mean to gloss over the last caller's question about Hillary's qualifications.
Let's list them.
And I gave him a truthful answer.
She doesn't have any.
But let's, if she did, I mean, what's her resume?
Let me run down some items for you.
Some of Hillary Clinton's greatest accomplishments.
That would include the Whitewater Land Scandal, which, as an offshoot, included Castle Grande, Madison Guarantee Trust.
Remember turning $10,000 into a hundred thousand dollars with cattle futures from Robert Redbone and reading the Wall Street Journal.
That's brilliance.
She spearheaded a lot of pardons for criminals under the table.
She also found a way to accept ChICOM contribution cash under the table using a Chinese restaurant entrepreneur named Charlie Tree.
She used the Riotis.
Mark Rich, Sandy Burglar.
I mean, the list goes on, but there aren't any achievements.
The one thing she attempted that she was given to do as payback early on was Hillary care.
And that blew up in her face.
The bimbo eruptions blew up in her.
She doesn't have any qualifications, but she's owed.
She's owed so much for what the Democrats consider to be great donations.
Hanging in with Bill, I don't need to go through the list.
Here is uh here's Hadley, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Great to have you on the program today.
Hello.
Hi.
Hey, how are you?
I'm good.
How are you?
Very well, thank you.
I just wanted to tell you congratulations on the release of your new book.
Thank you very much.
And I also wanted to tell you that I really appreciate all the artwork that you have in the book, and I started reading the first book with my three-year-old.
I have a one-year-old and a three-year-old.
And during story time at night, we've started reading the first book.
And she absolutely loves it.
And the pictures will talk about the pilgrims on the boat and having the layout of the boat.
We'll talk about where they were.
And she at three she loves it.
So it really is an all-ages kind of book.
And I can't wait to start the second one, which we already have, and then move on to the third one.
Well, I can't.
I mean, I that's just that's that's great, and I really appreciate your comment on the uh on the artwork and the graphics.
As I say, we're a small little team that we work very hard in crafting these books.
The writing is just one thing.
There are illustrations.
Uh the free domain, public domain pictures that we try to find.
Uh we're talking about children uh readers here, and they they benefit from pictures.
And uh we've so we've we've created uh actual characters and given them likenesses and so forth so the kids can can relate to them.
I'm really, really proud that you have recognized that.
I I just fantastic because even as a preschooler, she is excited to what's gonna happen in the next chapter, and we've just barely gotten into the first book, so I feel like I'm gonna link it, but it's it's already amazing.
Well, this is all I don't know, I don't know what to do.
This is music to my ears to hear this because it's exactly what we wanted to achieve to create this everything that you've just described here, the sense of excitement, the uh unpredictability.
Let me here's I wasn't gonna do this today because I thought it might end up sounding too self-serving, and I never want to sound self-serving, as you've been here a long time, you know.
But this is just another in a long line of reasons why we do these books, why they make sense.
This is a story from Fox News.
School's Nation of Islam handout paints founding fathers as racists.
Get this now.
The mother of an eight-year-old wants to know why a Tennessee school teacher gave her child a handout from the Nation of Islam that portrayed the presidents on Mount Rushmore as being racists.
Summer Bower tells me, this is Todd Starnes writing at Fox News.
Summer Bower tells me her son was given the Nation of Islam handout at Harold McCormick Elementary School in Elizabethan.
The handout asked, What does it take to be on Mount Rushmore?
The handout then explains that George Washington hailed from Virginia, a prime breeder of black people.
Of Theodore Roosevelt, it was alleged he called Africans ape-like.
There were also disparaging remarks made about Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln.
She said that her jaw dropped when she followed the link to a website that was listed on the handout.
Imagine her surprise when up popped the Nation of Islam home page.
This is Calypso Lewis group.
It raised a number of red flags.
She said they're basically saying the founding fathers were racists.
Well, Ms. Bauer, let me tell you, it's not just in your school this is taught.
This is taught in many universities.
It's taught in many public schools.
Not only were the founding fathers racists, the country still is racist.
Was founded in racism.
Summer said that she reached out to the teacher for an explanation, hoping it was an honest mistake.
At first, the teacher didn't recall which paper it was.
Later in the day, she found the paper and told me she didn't like what it said and said she must have printed it by mistake.
Teacher also told Summer her son was not supposed to take the Nation of Islam handout home.
It was supposed to stay in the classroom.
No doubt.
So they're passing out Nation of Islam literature as American history, which touts the presidents on Mount Rushmore as being racist and uh prime breeders of black people.
So this is just another in a long stack of reasons why.
There's actually a mission behind the Rush Revere.
Time travel adventures with exceptional American series.
Fastest three hours in media.
And we've got to take a brief time out here at the top.
I just realized I haven't even got the audio soundbite roster yet, and there's some gold in there too.
So sit tight, my friends.
▲
Export Selection