All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
31:50
October 28, 2014, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings to you, music lovers, thrill seekers, conversationalists, sports fans all across the fruited plain, Rush Limbaugh from the distinguished and prestigious Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Great to have you.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882 and the email address El Rushbo at EIBnet.com.
All right, I have the audio now from the Chicago activists just ripping into the Democrat Party.
It's about a four-minute rant.
We've divvied up here into four one-minute bites.
And here's who they are.
Paul McKinley, Mark Carter, Joseph Watkins, and Harold Nooney Ward.
Now, McKinley, Watson, Carter, and Ward have all served time in prison in the past.
They have since taken on the streets of Chicago to fight, taken to the streets of Chicago to fight against the injustices in their community and making this story all the more interesting.
The source for this is a website called RebelPundit.com.
And Rebel Pundit, I have a little background on it, just so you know from where this all comes.
Rebel Pundit was founded by Jeremy Siegel, an anti-activist, and continues as a group effort based on urban centers across the fruited plain.
The blog is a beacon of truth showing the unholy alliance of the mainstream media, Republican Party establishment, the Liberal Democrat Party, big unions, and corrupt not-for-profits.
This sounds like one of my kind of groups.
No, seriously, beacon of truth showing the unholy alliance, the mainstream media, the Republican Party establishment, the Liberal Democrat Party, big unions, and all these not-for-profits, which this bunch says is a bunch of corrupt organizations.
Our team takes to the field with cameras to show what isn't aired in the local and beyond.
The members of Rebel Pundit believe that exposing a true nature of liberalism and the toll it has taken on regular people's lives is our top mission.
And the story from which this audio comes, Chicago Activists Unchained Destroy Black Leadership.
Chicago activists Paul McKinley, Mark Carter, Joseph Watkins, and Harold Ward recently went on the record with Rebel Pundit.
They're not part of Rebel Pundit.
Rebel Pundit found them.
And they went on record with Rebel Pundit to deliver a message to black communities across the country.
That message sheds light on who they say are the real oppressors of their community, black liberal Democrats.
So we will listen.
You and I together here.
And I imagine that we're going to agree with quite a bit of it.
And many of us have been asking.
I mean, if you for 50 years have been voting for the Democrat Party on the basis that they're going to lead you to the promised land, that they're going to rescue you from economic oblivion, that they're going to end discrimination and racism against you, then why do you keep voting for them?
Because none of that's happened.
The Democrat Party has instead implemented policies that have destroyed the black family.
And it's not me who says that.
It is other blacks who have called here and told me that 25 years ago, 20 years ago, you name it.
It's a regular occurrence.
But it is a question that a lot of people, what is the hold?
What is it?
And all we could ever figure out was that no matter how bad the Democrats are and no matter how bad their policies are, the branding of the Republican Party and the black community is insurmountable.
That it's even worse.
And these guys, Again, they are Paul McKinley, Mark Carter, Joseph Watkins, Harold Nooney Ward.
Let's get started.
This was yesterday on a rebel pundit website, RebelPundit.com.
It's a video.
We got the audio from it.
For Chicago African-American activists talking about who are the real oppressors.
Black folks is in an abusive black leadership relationship.
We have to send a message.
This is the time for us to send a message.
We always talking about what the Republicans ain't done for us or what they will do to hurt us.
My life has been hurt by Democrats.
And we got in our mind that we always got to keep voting Democrat.
You know, look and see in your community who are the real oppressors in our community.
They always talk about black-on-black crime.
And when you hear the word black-on-black crime, the first thing you think of is a black man robbing you, a black man breaking in your house.
And that is a black-on-black crime.
But let's take it one step further.
There's a black-on-black crime down in City Hall.
There's a black-on-black crime down in all the state capitals in America where black folks are voting against our interests.
Where black folks are voting and making us, we're getting poor and poor, and other groups are getting richer and richer.
Everywhere you go, there's poverty in black areas.
This is like where I stand at right now.
I had to beware public housing residents to live at.
Most of the people at home is living in the street.
And it's because of you, Mr. President.
Doesn't need any commentary.
Here's the next.
We have four bites.
This rant went on for four minutes.
In Detroit, where your leaders at?
There's no white folks running Detroit, cutting water on black folks in Detroit.
Them black folks running that city.
Ain't no white folks doing that.
Them black folks going along with that.
Everything's happening in our community.
It's black leadership doing this.
Our children know that if the Democrats have not done anything for us as of yet, why should they even go out and vote?
What agenda is on the table that's going to change their life?
The only thing they're offering the black community is abortion on demand.
This is what the president is asking for us to vote for.
Now he wants to have this conversation about minimum wage raise because he knows that this is the way to get a lot of the poor people's attention.
But to hell with his minimum wage raise, we don't have any jobs.
A minimum wage raise for what?
They're not pushing a black agenda.
They're not pushing a family agenda.
They're pushing a neoliberal agenda.
Across this city in these major Democratic cities, this is what it looks like.
These guys are in Chicago.
They're nailing it.
They're saying things that anybody else other than them says, and it's heap big doo-doo.
But they were still not finished.
How can the same process happen over and over again?
And nobody got nothing, can't do nothing about it.
Black leadership is abusing us.
The Democratic Party is abusing us.
It's the same way in every black community across the country.
And they force us into a life of welfare.
We don't want no welfare.
We want opportunities to go to work.
We want opportunities to own business.
They bailed out all of the major banks and these big investors, but left the people starving.
There are no tea parties in your city.
We don't have those people.
We have a major Democratic machine, and the majority of them, they look like me.
These are the people who make sure we get nothing, but then turn around and have us to vote for them again.
They only come around when it's time for elections.
When they think they can give you a toy or give you a turkey or something, and everything is good.
Are they right about that too?
They come around and warn them about how bad the Republicans are going to be to them.
They come back and warn them about how mean the Republicans are going to be.
And they come around and they warn them that this is going to happen and that's going to happen.
Meanwhile, these guys are taking notes of what has been happening under Democrat Party rule and domination in all of these cities run by Democrats.
They're taking stock and taking note of conditions that black people live under in these places run by Democrats, black and white.
I've not, look, we've had calls over the course of the program here from individuals who have said things like this.
But never from the street level.
We've never had any guys like this call.
Well, maybe a couple.
I wouldn't know for sure.
But this is intense and it is serious.
And these guys mean it.
And they certainly understand it.
It's liberalism doing them in.
And no black agenda.
This is a neoliberal agenda they're talking about.
And here's the final bite.
This runs just under a minute.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are coming down from the federal government.
But the money is going to all these special interest groups.
My brother's keeper went to his friends, this whole corrupt democratic system that gobbles up all the dollars and starves the people out.
Can you all look around your community and see any change that have come about with these hundreds of billions of dollars that have come through our cities?
No, you cannot.
What we do see is our elected officials riding around in new cars, and they have new homes.
When our people don't have jobs in our communities, when we don't have any vital resources, when all the deals been cut, and all our people are left out, this is where we end up.
And we've got the most important thing that we've got that we can stop all this.
Everybody got a vote.
And if you use your vote wisely, you can stop a lot of this stuff.
These guys are out on a get out the vote campaign, except it's unlike any I have ever seen.
These guys are in a get out the vote campaign, and they are urging people to vote against status quo, and that is the Democrat Party running the show.
And they're right.
Look at all the money supposedly over the years, billions that's been allocated to wipe out these horrible circumstances that poor people, black and white, live under.
And yet, despite all, it's actually trillions since 1964, and it's still the same percentage of people in poverty.
And black people, the worst.
There's something else these guys notice.
There ain't no Tea Party here.
Don't tell us a Tea Party hurting us.
There isn't any Tea Party here.
All we got is Democrats running our show.
There's no Tea Party here in Chicago.
Don't tell us about the Tea Party.
There aren't any white people turning off the water in Detroit.
Aren't the Republicans doing that to us?
It's inescapably true.
Everything these guys are saying is, what are you smirking about in there, Mr. Snerdley?
Oh, you love it.
You're not dubious about this.
No, no.
I know.
This couldn't, this is couldn't come at a better time.
And it's right on the streets in Chicago.
Again, these guys that you were just listening to, they are Chicago activists Paul McKinley, Mark Carter, Joseph Watkins, and Harold Nooney Ward.
And they made these statements, I guess, in an interview at a website called RebelPundit.com.
We have to take a timeout.
We'll be back and continue after this.
We still have all kinds of stuff here in these stacks of stuff today.
For example, I have this in Breitbart.com, exclusive.
Rinz Priebus rallies base says GOP will stop Obama's un-American amnesty if we win the Senate.
Maybe it's Reinz.
Yeah, that's what it says here.
I never can remember how to pronounce this man's name.
I don't think it's Rinz.
Probably Reinz.
Reinz Priebus, or Reince Priebus, the chairman of the Republican National Committee, says it's un-American for President Obama to consider implementing an executive amnesty for millions of illegal aliens across the country.
He said it's unconstitutional, it's illegal, and we do not support it, he replied when a Tea Party activist asked him about the president's plans for an executive amnesty on a conference call hosted by theTeaParty.net last night.
I don't support it.
It's wrong, Priebus said.
It's un-American for a president to try and do such a thing.
And I want to make it clear, there is no part of me, there's not a molecule in my body that agrees with the president on executive amnesty.
Priebus promised the hundreds of activists on the phone call that the Republican Party, if it takes the Senate on November 4th, will do everything in its power to stop Obama from proceeding on the executive amnesty.
Priebus even boldly predicted that the Republicans can and will succeed in stopping Obama if elected on November 4th.
He said, while I can't speak for the legislature, I am very confident we will stop that.
We will do everything we can to make sure it doesn't happen.
Defunding, going to court, injunction, you name it, it's wrong, it's illegal, and for so many reasons.
And just the basic fabric of this country, we cannot allow it to happen and we won't let it happen.
I don't know how to be any stronger than it.
I'm telling you, everything we can do to stop it, we will.
You ought to hear the shock and surprise I am being greeted with here in the studio.
People are saying, why'd they wait so long to announce this?
You know why people are surprised?
Let me tell you why people are surprised.
The reason people are surprised is because the assumption has been all along that the Republicans, because of the Chamber of Commerce threats and donations, want amnesty and are in there to support it because we've been told Republicans have to do that if they're ever going to win the presidency.
Because if they don't do that, the Hispanics are going to continue to hate their guts and they can't win the presidency if the Hispanics hate their guts.
And the only way to stop the Hispanics from hating their guts is to do amnesty.
And how many Republican senators have we heard say this?
Now, not executive amnesty.
They say that they're for comprehensive immigration reform and they claim it's not amnesty.
It's a thin line that they're walking there.
But this is the most definitive statement on this that we've heard from anybody in the Republican Party leadership.
And apparently it was a very long conference call with a Tea Party group.
And it's much longer than what I just read.
This whole story is 27 pages.
Now, it could be he was just worn down by it.
I imagine this guy is being bombarded with this question everywhere he goes because the people assume the Republican Party's for amnesty.
There have been enough indicators that the Republican Party, the Chamber of Commerce guy has come out and said, you may as well not even nominate a candidate for 2016 if you don't make this happen.
And I can't tell you the number of Republicans who've publicly in recent months said that they stood for comprehensive immigration reform.
And as the Democrats in Obama mean it, that's amnesty.
So they have, by association, we doing the associating, have concluded that they were for amnesty.
Here comes the chairman of the RNC.
So ain't no way, Jose, no way, no how anytime.
We're going to fight it with every piece of ammunition we have.
And by the way, you better be prepared to.
Because, folks, I'm going to tell you, as far as Barack Obama is concerned, he doesn't care who wins the Senate.
When it's all said and done, it isn't going to change what he's doing.
I think everybody ought to buckle up for Obama in these last two years.
It isn't going to matter.
I mean, it may be a disappointment on election night, and it may be, but come January, it isn't going to matter.
He's going to executive action, executive order as much as he thinks he can get away with.
And he's going to go, I think, at NASCAR breakneck speeds.
And I don't think he's going to care what they say in the Senate.
I don't think he's going to care what they do in the Senate because he knows the one thing they won't do is impeach him.
And so Obama's going to tell himself there's no way they're going to stop me.
He's going to tell himself they won't even try to stop me.
They may try to stop me by not giving me the votes, but what do I care?
I'm going to sign executive actions.
I'm going to have Ron Clain out there leading the way for me.
I'm going to sign executive orders.
I'm just, I hope I'm wrong about this, but I think these next two years, everybody ought to buckle up.
This is about more than us winning the Senate.
There's going to have to be some things that we do that accompany that victory.
And Obama's not going to care about public opinion either.
I just haven't found a way.
With all of the communicative ability that I have been blessed with, I still haven't found a way to persuade people just how thoroughly passionately ideological Obama is.
I really, I firmly believe that the vast majority of people that voted for him in 2008 didn't have any ideology in mind.
They weren't even thinking ideology.
They weren't thinking left, right, conservative, liberal.
They were just thinking, in Obama's case, I think a vast majority of people were thinking we can end racism.
We can finally bury that thing.
We can elect a black president.
That's going to be the end of all this discussion of racism.
A lot of people, I think, thought that.
I tried to caution them.
They were wrong.
It was going to get worse.
A lot of people thought, well, I don't care what they thought.
I know they weren't looking at Obama as a liberal.
He wasn't elected on that basis.
Otherwise, if he were, if he were elected on the basis of his liberal ideology, there wouldn't be all these polling data out there expressing how mad people are, how upset people are, and how much they oppose all this.
So they weren't electing Barack Obama, the liberal.
They were erecting, sorry, they were electing Barack Obama the empty canvas.
And they were able to make him whatever they wanted him to be.
If he represented the end of racism in America, finally elected, it would demonstrate that this country is no longer racist.
That was a big one.
But there were other things too.
But now his ideology is front and center.
And I still don't think people realize how totally driven by it he is.
And that's why I'm warned these next two years are going to require seat belts, even when you're asleep.
Talent, so much talent On loan from God, Rush Lindbaugh.
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Here's Richard Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.
Great to have you on the program today.
Hello.
You know, Rush, I wasn't going to say anything to begin with, but I really want to thank you for what you do and the way you do it and the influence that the 25-plus years that you've been on radio, the effect that you've had on the Conservative Party, the legacy of Reagan.
And I'll leave it at that.
I want to get your take on something in regards to Obama and the Senate race.
Yeah.
I'd like to make a comment afterwards about Obama saying that it's okay what these people do because they got to do what they have to do to get elected.
I'd like to comment on that.
But what I'd like to lay out before you is this.
In Kentucky, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Georgia, and Louisiana, you have five white women that are running for the Senate.
It's been made very clear by most of the politicos that the black vote needs to be garnered in order for them to get elected.
If they can get the black vote out, they can get them elected.
However, we've got an African-American president, which they've taken to why we can't recognize him, we can't acknowledge him, and they're doing that and asking for a constituency that's 90% for the president of the United States to vote for them when they're dissing him.
How does that work out?
What's your take on that?
It is very, very strange.
I think you have probably set that table in a more understandable way than I have heard anybody explain it.
Because you just nailed it.
You are exactly right.
Here you have five white women seeking reelection.
They desperately need the black turnout.
We just had a story today that in New Orleans, only 5% of the black votes voted an early vote for Mary Landrew.
Well, period.
Mary Landrew is the white woman you're talking about there.
And if that's all they get, then it's Sayonara.
And yet here's the first black president, Barack Hussein Obama, and none of these white women want him anywhere near their campaigns.
So how do we explain this?
The explanation is the guy is toxic and will cause others who might want to vote for these white women to stay home.
So they don't want him anywhere near their campaign.
And he said, I don't care.
I don't blame them.
They just got to do what they got to do to get elected.
In the meantime, the irony is the first black president is an albatross around the necks of five white women who need the black vote because he will hurt.
How in the world did this happen?
And the reason it happened is because people have seen it isn't working.
The polling data is all over the place about the dissatisfaction all over the country.
And in many cases, all of it's blaming Obama.
Now, what did you want to say about the president saying he doesn't care that they have to do what they have to do, and he understands that?
And they support me anyway.
Everybody knows that.
Well, here's something I put forth.
The Democratic Party has finally succeeded in convincing people that the ends justify the means.
Obama came out and said they got to say whatever they have to say to get elected.
Bob Beckle spends every day on TV saying it's okay to lie.
You have to do what you have to do.
It's all right to do that.
Well, I'll tell you how I feel as one single American.
I can't tell my children unless they're going to college in political science when they lie to me.
It's okay.
And here's the other take on that.
There are consequences for lying in America.
Ask Martha Stewart.
Martha Stewart didn't go to jail for insider trading.
She went to jail because she lied.
William Jefferson Clinton didn't get impeached, but he lost his license for practicing law in Arkansas for lying.
I don't think that lying justifies what people do.
And that's just my take on it.
And thanks for taking my question.
Oh, I appreciate it.
Well, that's another brilliant point because I'm going to tell you right here and right now that one of the reasons Bill Clinton is a rock star in the Democrat Party is because he's viewed to have succeeded in getting away with lying.
And in doing so, he beat the Republicans, and that's why he's a rock star with them.
He's a rock star because he beat the Republicans and he lied.
And as far as they're concerned, he got away with it.
Bill Clinton is, to a lot of people, Bill Clinton is a walking piece of evidence that lying works, that lying pays off.
Bob Beckle has to defend the Democrat Party.
He's on Fox every day, and the caller's right.
Beckles, hey, got to do what you got to do.
Everybody does it.
It's politics.
And it is a reason people are turned off to it.
There's no question.
I've got a Beckle soundbite here.
Let me see if it has anything to do with it.
Nap, nothing about lying.
Just how Obama's toxic, but there's nothing new about that.
So it says here, of course, Obama's toxic, but that's nothing new.
It's not his fault.
I've got other soundbites I want to get, such as this.
One of my all-time favorite TV weather people, John Coleman.
John Coleman founded the Weather Channel.
John Coleman was the best weatherman Good Morning America has ever had.
I remember when I first heard of John Coleman, it was a winter in which Chicago had a week's worth or 10 days' worth of blizzards, and this would have been back in the 70s.
And John Coleman didn't go home.
And by day five, he looked like he was asleep on that show doing the weather.
It was a yeoman job.
Everybody that week in Chicago, that's where he was.
They cut away to Chicago when it was time to do the weather.
He was entertaining.
He was credible.
And he's in retirement for the most part now.
But he's the Weather Channel founder.
And he's out saying this global warming is a myth.
It's not just a hoax.
It's a lie.
And I've had it in the stack since last week.
And I haven't gotten to it because been there, done that.
And I didn't have any audio of him saying it, but we do now.
He was on with Megan Kelly last night on the Fox News channel.
And she said, man-made global climate change is a myth?
How can you say that?
You know, a climate skeptic can rarely get on TV ever since Al Gore made it a plank of the Democratic Party.
And I've been in TV news organizations now for 60 years, and I only met two Republicans the whole time, and they were both hiding in the closet.
It's a tough go for people who don't believe in climate change.
Well, it's very difficult for anybody to be against it because the media has told the nation over and over again, day after day for 20 years, that the oceans are rising, the polar bears are dying, the ice is melting, that storms are going to sweep the earth, and that we're all going to die of a heat wave.
Right.
So Megan Kelly said, well, let's get specific.
Because you talk about how the effort to prove the theory that carbon dioxide is a significant greenhouse gas that's causing significant warming has failed.
And yet the data say that carbon dioxide was proven to be a greenhouse gas in a 1957 paper by Roger Rebelle.
The EPA says it's a greenhouse gas.
Scientific community has accepted that it's a greenhouse gas, and that the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has gone up since 1958.
Well, there are 9,000 PhDs and 31 scientists who have signed a petition that says it is not a significant greenhouse gas.
Oh, it's a teeny greenhouse gas, but it's not in any way significant.
And we are sure of it.
It's not like something I made up or just thought of.
I've studied and studied and studied.
And Roger Revelle, the great scientist who wrote that paper back in 1957 with Hans Seuss, changed his mind a decade later and said, wait a minute, I think we were wrong.
Don't anybody panic.
I don't think there's any global warming.
And that's when Al Gore said he was senile.
Right, senile.
Right.
Now, I just saw a story the other day.
I saw two stories.
Arctic ice is at a record level for this time of year.
There's more Arctic ice than anybody ever predicted.
And there was the second story a couple days later said the melting Arctic, get this, melting Arctic ice, melting Arctic ice portends a disastrous winter.
Melting, there isn't any melting.
If it were melting, it would be because of warming, and that's going to give us a calamitous winter.
This is the kind of illogic these people have been reduced to.
One more from John Coleman, who concluded with this.
Well, I would like to announce tonight to people who are friends of Al Gore's that, whoops, he got that one wrong.
The Antarctic ice cap is at an all-time record high in both coverage and thickness.
And the Arctic ice cap at the North Pole is at the highest it has been in several years.
It's in its so-called normal range since we got satellite observations that could measure it.
So not only is the ice not melting, more polar bears are alive and happy today than we've had in 100 years.
Life is good, Miss Kelly.
I got to tell you, life is good.
That's John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, no longer has anything to do with it, maybe a meritous name on a masthead or something, but he was a former weatherman for Good Morning America.
But the story I had last week, and I may still have it in the stack over here, he had some devastating quotes just nuking these people, perpetuating this myth, this hoax.
But I have to take a break now.
Sit tight, we'll be back.
Don't go away.
I'll tell you something else I'm going to have to say for tomorrow.
This Cheryl Atkins and her book, I mean, even Howard Kurtz thinks what CBS News did to her and what the government did to her is chilling.
Planting classified documents on her computer, an iMac, so that they could then charge her with violating privacy, secrecy, whatever, accuse her of stealing documents.
That's why they put the documents on her computer.
And by the way, it's not that hard to do.
It wouldn't involve a major.
You know what they also found a fiber optic internet connection line in her house that she didn't order.
They put in a line direct to her house that she didn't even know was there and she didn't order.
I mean, as somebody said, Nixon never even dreamed of this stuff.
So I'll put that on the top of tomorrow's stack.
Thanks for being with us today, folks.
It's been great, and we'll be back tomorrow in 21 hours to do it all over again.
And here it is, Rush Revere and the American Revolution.
The third in the Time Travel Adventure series is out today and available to be in your hands by the night.
The third book in this series.
So proud of it.
So excited it's out.
▲
Export Selection