All Episodes
Previous Next
March 10, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:51
March 10, 2014, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
So I was tootling down the interstate the other day and I heard Rush talking about CNN canceling this bloke called Piers Morgan.
And Rush said that Americans don't want to have to listen to some foreigner with a snotty accent telling them everything that's wrong with their country.
And that's why here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, we have quality controls on our guest host program designed to ensure that that can never happen here.
Rush is away today at a charity event.
I don't think he mentioned that when he signed off on Friday, but it was a last-minute charity request.
However, he will return tomorrow for authentic, full-strength, unadulterated excellence in broadcasting.
In the meantime, this is Mark Stein, your undocumented anchor man.
Thrilled to be here live from Ice Station EIB in far northern New Hampshire.
I was in the Dominion of Canada all last week, and I'm not quite fully reassimilated yet.
So if I start talking about beaver pelts and where to buy a good curling stone, I'm sure HR will stage an intervention.
I was up there for what's really the Canadian version of CPAC, which was going on down in Washington.
And I may talk about the difference between what I saw up north and what's been happening in Washington.
1-800-282-2882 is the number to call as we begin another week of surveying the geopolitical scene in full.
The stunning news this morning is the surprise election results out of North Korea.
In Sunday's elections for the country's highest legislative body, Kim Jong-un was re-elected with, go on, take a wild guess.
Kim Jong-un, 97%, says HR.
No, good heavens.
What crazy alternative universe are you living in, HR, where, you know, there's a swing against Kim Jong-un and he only gets 97% because Ralph Nader or Pat DuCannon got the other 3% or whatever.
No, he was Kim Jong-un was re-elected with a perfect score, 100% of the vote.
And not only, and this is what's impressive, I think, to people who are involved in politics professionally.
I mean, this is like a little bit of inside baseball, but for the insiders, it's fascinating.
Not only was it 100% of the vote, but it was a 100% turnout.
So every single person went to the polls and every single person voted for Kim Jong-un.
Yeah, he did.
He didn't just secure the base.
You're right about this, HR.
He managed to appeal to the independents and actually cross over to the guys on the other side, too.
So 100% of the vote on a 100% turnout.
Whoever's running the get-out-the-vote operation for Kim Jong-un really knows his stuff.
I mean, if Mitt had had that guy on the team, whatever it was a year and a quarter ago, things could have been very different.
100%.
Having said that, a cautionary note.
I'm not sure if this is just the exit poll or the hard numbers.
You know, maybe by the time the last boxes come through from the upcountry town halls and school gyms and whatnot, Kim Jong-un-un will be up to like 107% of the vote.
But he's really turned this thing around.
A week ago, apparently, there was a Zogby poll that showed him plummeting to 98.7%.
And Dick Morris had some internal numbers showing that North Korean soccer moms want more spending on healthcare and the environment and less on torture and concentration camps.
But he managed to turn it around 100%.
You've got to hand it to the guy.
I mean, this clearly shows the wisdom of Kim Jong-un executing his uncle a couple of weeks back, because otherwise he'd only have won with 99.9999999999% of the vote.
So terrific result for Kim Jong-un in the North Korean elections.
100% of the vote.
Maybe, who knows?
Who knows?
Democrats might yet pull that off, at least in certain Chicago precincts this November.
It's something to aim for.
Turning to our own supreme leader, David Jackson reports in USA Today, President Obama returns to the White House from Key Lago, Florida on Sunday, following a weekend of relaxation, golf, and calling world leaders about the Russian incursion into Ukraine.
Doesn't that sound like the perfect weekend vacation package we've all been looking for?
Join us for two days of fine dining, dancing, margaritas by the pool, and the occasional report on protesters being shot in the Crimea while you're enjoying an aromatherapy massage and seaweed wrap in our exclusive beach cabins wafted by ocean breezes.
That's President Obama.
He's now back following a weekend of relaxation, golf, and calling world leaders about the Russian incursion into Ukraine.
Before leaving Florida, Obama got in a second straight day of golf on Sunday with the same playing partners as on Saturday.
If you're wondering who the president plays golf with, Bill Clinton used to play golf with Vernon Jordan.
And Vernon Jordan was once asked what they talked about while they played golf.
And he gave a one-word answer that I shall politely euphemize as saying they were talking about the finer points of the fairer sex.
But Obama, Obama obviously is a far more serious and important and consequential figure.
And so he plays golf.
He plays golf in between calling world leaders about the Russian incursion into Ukraine.
He plays golf with former basketball star Alonzo Morning, broadcaster and former pro football player Ahmed Rashad, and family friend Cyrus Walker.
The foursome played both days at the Ocean Reef Resort in Key Lago.
Do you remember years ago they used to say, oh, the presidency is too much for one man.
It's too demanding, too grueling.
These days, it doesn't seem to be enough for one man.
I don't know why they don't have an amendment to the Constitution, making it like a part-time position.
He can maybe come in two days a week, something like that.
Because he was, where was he?
He was in Hawaii for two weeks at the end of December.
It's two months later now, and he's in Key Lago, Florida.
But he's been speaking.
Don't worry, he's been taking this thing seriously.
He's not just, I'm sure he discussed the Russian incursion into Ukraine with former basketball star Alonzo Morning and his other golf partners, but he also spoke separately on Saturday with the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and Italy and the President of France,
all of whom, quote, reiterated their grave concern over Russia's clear violation of international law and reaffirmed their support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, unquote, after which Obama headed back out onto the golf course.
I think he'd been waiting for his plus fours to be pressed by housekeeping and return to his room.
Obama also called Russia's neighbors in the Baltic state, speaking with Latvian President Andris Berzins, Lithuanian President Dalia Gribauskait, and Estonian President Thomas Hendrik Ilves.
These Obama, quote, reaffirmed the United States' unwavering commitment, unquote, to quote, our Baltic allies, unquote, according to a White House statement.
So once you've got that level of support, my advice to Latvian President Andris Berzins and Estonian President Thomas Hendrik Ilves is to pack quickly and get the hell out of the presidential palace.
But I don't even know whether these guys were planning on being invaded by Russia anytime soon.
But at any rate, President Obama has assured them that if they are invaded by Vladimir Putin, it's not going to be like when certain other countries are invaded by Vladimir Putin.
He will take it very seriously.
He's going to draw one of those red lines in the sand or whatever they have instead of sand up in the Baltic states.
It's going to be like Syria, where he drew a clear red line in the sand.
And that is what he will do in the event that Vladimir Putin decides to invade any more countries and violate their national sovereignty.
So that's what he was doing in between playing golf at Key Lago.
Kate Key Lago, famed by Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall in that movie.
And also some, wasn't there some schlocky soft rock song from the 80s called Key Lago?
Maybe he was listening to that.
Maybe it was being piped into him as he was having his cocktails by the pool and dancing under the stars.
Oh, the burdens of the U.S. presidency are absolutely, absolutely stunning.
Meanwhile, life goes on.
He is apparently going to meet with the Ukrainian Prime Minister on Wednesday.
And Vice President Joe Biden.
This is how serious it is.
Vice President Joe Biden has cut short his trip to Latin America, nixing a planned stop in the Dominican Republic, according to the Associated Press, so he can attend Wednesday's meeting.
Biden had been the White House's prime point of contact with Ukraine's President Viktor Yanukovych before he fled to Russia last month following violent clashes in Kiev.
That worked out well for that guy, having Biden as his principal point of contact with the U.S. administration.
But now Biden is taking it seriously.
He's cancelled his trip to Latin America and he is flying in for a meeting with the Ukrainian Prime Minister on Wednesday.
The fascinating thing about this is this, nobody is going to do anything.
The United States isn't going to do anything about what Russia has done in the Crimea.
I'm like an old school imperialist, so I remember the Crimean War in the 1850s, love to rerun it again.
Terrific, Florence Nightingale, the whole deal.
But Obama isn't going to do anything.
But the appearance of appearing gravely concerned, going through this foreign policy theater, having meetings with prime ministers, getting on the phone and calling leaders of the Baltic states, gives the newspapers something to cover other than Lois Lerner, the IRS, the lousy economy, Obamacare, and everything else.
So you will look for that photograph on the evening news or on the front of the New York Times of the Prime Minister, of the president with his jacket off in the Oval Office on the phone to a prime minister, someone on the planet.
Doesn't have to be a prime minister.
A real prime minister could be anyone.
He could be on the phone to the deputy tourist minister of the South Sandwich Islands.
Doesn't matter.
In fact, he might not have anybody on the phone.
He might just have actually one of his golf partners.
What's the name of this guy again?
The former basketball star Alonzo Morning, broadcast or broadcaster and former pro football player Ahmed Russia.
He might be on the phone to Alonzo Morning and say, yeah, yeah, yeah, I can do Key Lago, a couple of days of golf.
Oh, can you hang on a minute?
Someone's coming in to photograph me as if I'm on the phone speaking to the Chancellor of Germany.
So can you just don't get worried if I say, oh, hi, Ankola, I'm gravely concerned about what's happening in Ukraine.
They're just taking a photograph for the front page of the New York Times.
I'll roll up my shirt sleeves so that it looks as if I'm doing some serious work.
That's what this is.
Foreign policy shadow theater to distract from domestic policy meltdown.
1-800-282-2882 as we start another week on the Rushlinbosha.
By the way, by the way, just to clarify the historic nature of that Kim Jong un 100% re-election vote in North Korea, the previous best, the previous best was Saddam Hussein in his last presidential election when he got 99.89% of the votes cast.
Now, you're probably thinking, oh, the 0.11% were probably just killed them on the way to the poll.
But it might have something to do with the fact that Saddam Hussein chose as his, this is true, by the way, Saddam Hussein chose as his campaign theme song that year, I Will Always Love You by Whitney Houston.
And it's easy to see why, you know, he might well have got 100% of the vote, but he went down to 99.89% just because 0.11% of the Iraqi population were brave enough to cast a protest vote against a dictator.
Dictators are, you know, okay, a dictator is one thing.
A dictator who chooses I will always love you as his campaign theme song is an entirely different one.
1-800-282-2882.
Rush on, I think it was Thursday or Friday, Rush was talking about the House Oversight Committee, as it's laughably called, in which Lois Lerner was testifying and Lois Lerner of the IRS, Lois Lerner, pleaded the fifth, took the Fifth Amendment.
This was the second time she'd done that.
And at that point, this is supposed to be a House Oversight Committee hearing on What's going on at the IRS because the IRS is corrupt.
The tax collection agency of the United States of America is corrupt, which means that the government of the United States is corrupt.
We can make our jokes about North Korea and Iraq and all the rest of it.
It hasn't yet turned genocidal, but it is certainly corrupt because that's like a core function.
That's one of the core functions of government.
If a government cannot collect revenue and assess taxes fairly, it can't do anything fairly.
So the government of the United States is corrupt.
And so Lois Lerner's testimony is not unimportant.
But Elijah Cummings came to the rescue by staging some little meltdown.
He's the ranking Democrat on the committee by staging some little meltdown after the chairman of the committee had ruled that since Lois Lerner wasn't going to say anything, there was nothing to talk about and everything was over.
And he went then, went into his little meltdown, and that became the story.
And as Rush was talking about on Thursday or Friday, that's what it's all about: misdirection.
Misdirection.
Because instead of reporting about Lois Lerner and the IRS, all the headlines the following morning were about the racist Republicans cutting off a black Democrat when he was speaking at the committee.
Get used to this, folks.
It's going to be like this every day now until November.
Because what the Democrats, what the Obama administration is trying to do between now and November is, in effect, suspend reality.
You might see the reality out there when you leave the House, when you drive around, you might see the reality of America, which is like their flat-lined economy going nowhere.
Millions of people having their health care plans canceled.
The political enemies of the president being targeted on an industrial scale by the tax collection agency of the government.
That's the reality.
But he's going to be saying, no, no, no, it's all about American, it's all about right-wing racism.
It's all about the war on women.
Tonight, tonight, Democrats are going to be staying up all night in the Senate.
They're going to be having a Senate debate on climate change, climate change.
This is what they used to call global warming.
There's been no global warming since 1998.
We're basically in the 17th year now of the so-called what they now call the pause.
That's to say, if you are a graduate, there's been basically 17th year.
So if you're graduating from high school, there's been no global warming.
Despite everything you've been told, despite all the screenings of Al Gore movies you've had to sit through, there's been no global warming since before you were in kindergarten.
But nevertheless, the critical issue facing the United States is climate change.
So the senators are going to be staying up all night tonight to talk about climate change.
It's all about misdirection, about creating an alternative reality, an alternative reality that Democrats can ride to victory as they see it in this November's elections.
We'll talk about that straight ahead.
Yes, Rush is away today.
He's at a charity event that he had late notice of.
That's why he didn't, I don't think he mentioned it Friday, but he'd had basically a charity request come through and he gives a lot of time, a lot of his time, to charities and he decided to honor it.
So he will be back tomorrow to take you through the end of the week with full strength, authentic all-American excellence in broadcasting.
I mentioned that sort of foreign policy theater, whenever something is happening on the other side of the world, and suddenly the newspapers and TV shows are filled with photographs of man on phone.
sitting behind desk.
So they'll show, like, President Obama holding a phone to his ear and it will say, you know, President Obama spoke over the weekend with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and I was suggesting that this phone theatre is completely...
I mean, I don't even know why...
Why do editors go along with it?
You know, the newspapers here are so boring, so boring.
It's nothing even to do with left-wing or right-wing or any of that.
They're just boring.
Why would he put a picture of a man in a shirt holding a phone to his ear, right?
And yet they do.
And President Obama, but President Obama is, to be fair to him, is not the only person to do this.
David Cameron, the ghastly squish and nominal conservative who is Her Majesty's first minister in the United Kingdom, posted a picture of himself on the other end of the Obama phone call.
So like there's this, he tweeted this picture of himself.
And again, I don't understand what kind of person tweets this photograph.
I'd rather you'd go full Anthony Wiener.
If you're going to tweet a photograph of yourself on the phone to President Obama, at least be doing it in your underpants.
But this guy, Cameron, in London tweets a picture of himself on the phone to President Obama with a super serious face, right?
He's got, because they're talking about Ukraine, so he puts on his serious face, right?
He puts on his super serious face, like he's just been told that he can't get two tickets for Phantom of the Opera tonight.
They're sold out.
So he puts on his super serious face as he's on the phone and he tweeted it.
And God bless them.
People immediately, and the accompanying tweet for this picture of Cameron looking super serious was, I've been speaking to at Barack Obama, that's Obama's Twitter handle, about the situation in Ukraine.
We are united in condemnation of Russia's actions.
They're so united in condemnation of Russia that they're both putting on their super serious face as they show this photograph of the man.
And you can see he's on the phone.
He's on the phone.
By the way, these are phones now, telephones.
You can't buy these telephones in the store.
They're telephones that only exist for the purpose of world leader serious phone call photo ops, because they're like those old kind of bake light, heavy telephones with the light cord going down down to the.
That's not even how.
That's not how they took, that's not even how they take these things.
When Obama speaks to Cameron, he's like on his cell phone from the golf course.
So he's not.
There's no great wire dangling down past it.
But for the great Ceremonial, Great Ceremonial world leader photo or telephone photo op, you always have the old phone with the dangling wire cord going down to the desk.
So, Cameron looking super serious as he talks on the phone.
And immediately all kinds of people began tweeting their own.
David Caberon, super serious phone pics.
Rob Rob Delaney, uh, tweets a picture of himself holding up a crest toothpaste tube to his ears, hi, David Barack, i'm on the line now, get me up to speed.
Uh eventually, I think uh.
Then the next guy tweets some kind of, uh, he's holding his dog up to the phone.
Uh, saying thanks for holding i'm, i'm good to go now eventually.
The great sir Patrick Stewart, uh, from Star Trek, The Next Generation, you know the bull guy, not Captain Kirk uh the, but the bull guy in uh, what was he called?
Admiral Picard, I think in Star Jean-luc Picard in Star Trek, The Next Generation.
Sir Patrick Stewart holds up, holds up a a uh a a a uh, a container of wet wipes to his ear and says that he's now on the looking super serious and he's now on the line for this.
Why do people go?
Why do?
Why do they go along with it?
Yeah, he goes.
Uh, David Caber at Barack Obama i've now patched in as well, sorry for the delay.
Uh, sir Patrick Stewart holding up his wet ones.
Uh, as he took the uh, as he, as he took the uh, the core joined the conference call of world leaders with super serious faces, taking what's going on in the Crimea super seriously.
I don't know who.
I don't know why even America's lame-o newspapers the dullest on the planet uh are are nevertheless so dull uh that they feel obliged to uh to run these ridiculous photographs.
But uh, every time, every time you see a photograph uh, there's all kinds of interesting photographs you could run on about the Crimea.
There's all kinds of uh, terrible things going on.
But every time you run a photograph of Obama on the phone to a world leader uh, you're basically, you're basically acting as the court eunuchs uh, for for king Barack, because you're, you're nothing's.
He's not going to do anything, he's not going to launch a new crime war.
This is part of the new misdirection so that uh, he pretends to be taking seriously some foreign policy crisis that is, in fact, he's just like you.
He's no more.
He makes no more difference to what's going on in the crimea than mrs Mabel Scroggins of 57 Elm Street, Now'sville Junction.
He's entirely irrelevant to it.
But when he's photographed on the phone with a super serious expression on his face uh, then that's Than that space in the newspaper, that space in the evening news that's not being taken up by the meltdown of his domestic program, by Obamacare, by the IRS, by the NSA, or any of the rest of it.
Let's go to Greg.
Greg is in Amarillo, Texas.
Greg, you are live on America's number one radio show.
Hi, morning.
Mark, how are you?
I'm doing good.
How's things with you?
Oh, doing well.
I have a question.
You were talking about Kim Jong-un's election.
I was wondering who ran against him and have they executed him yet?
It was Bob Dole, I believe.
Bob Dole.
He gave an incredibly moving concession speech, and he said he accepted the verdict of the people, and now it was time to go home, back home, and live a simple life in the small town where he grew up in the Watergate building in Washington, D.C.
It was an incredibly moving concession speech.
Where's a Clinton when you need one?
By the way, Greg, just to take that seriously for the moment, Kim Jong-un, who got 100% of the vote, and I said I thought that was an all-time record.
I gather it was beaten by Patrick Leahy, Democrat Senator of Vermont.
Do you remember this must be about 15 years ago now when Leahy was up for re-election?
And the Democrats basically co-opted the Republican primary and put up octogenarian dairy farmer Fred Tuttle to run against him.
And Fred Tuttle, while Leahy spent the usual billion dollars on ads, Fred Tuttle, I think, said he'd confine his campaign spending to $17.37 because that was all he had.
And Tuttle himself, the Republican candidate, this octogenarian dairy farmer from, I think, Tunbridge, Vermont, actually voted for Pat Leahy.
So while Kim Jong-un's 100% of the vote is impressive, in fact, I believe Pat Leahy in that Vermont Senate election actually got 108% of the vote that year.
So he's not quite in the Pat Leahy league, Kim Jong-un.
Oh, okay.
Maybe next time.
Maybe next time.
Thanks for your call, Greg.
They're pikers, basically.
The North Koreans, they're pretty good, but they're pikers.
They're neophytes next to the Democrats when it comes to pulling this kind of stuff.
Let's face it.
Mark Stein in for rush on America's number one radio show.
We'll take more of your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for rush on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
By the way, just to take seriously that question of who Kim Jong-un was running against, HR has now, in fact, looked into it.
And Kim Jong-un's opponent in yesterday's election was, in fact, Kim now gone.
So we just wanted to bring you up to speed on that and make sure you were fully apprised of that.
We're talking about the misdirection, the things that the Democratic Party is going to be talking about between now and November's election.
And we saw a little bit of it, as Rush mentioned earlier at the end of last week, in the coverage of the Lois Lerner IRS testimony.
In other words, no coverage of Lois Lerner and the IRS, only coverage of Republican racists shutting off a black congressman, Elijah Cummings, in mid-meltdown.
And we're going to be seeing more of it tonight when senators will be staying up all night to talk about climate change.
Climate change entirely irrelevant to everything facing the United States at the moment.
Climate's doing just fine.
Planet's doing just fine.
But nevertheless, and that's one reason why guys like John Kerry, who've drunk the old climate Kool-Aid, are sounding nuttier and nuttier when they go on about this stuff.
Take it from, I know whereof I speak on the whole climate change issue because I'm being sued by the guy who created the hockey stick that showed basically the last thousand years as the flat stick, the flat handle of the hockey stick, and then the 20th century shooting up like this hockey stick blade.
That guy's suing me for, well, I forget what it is, it's a sum in the high seven figures or some piffling amount like that.
So I know where they speak on this whole climate change thing because I'm tree-ringed up the wazoo in getting on top of all this stuff.
And there's nothing to worry about.
There's nothing to worry about in the climate.
But Democrats figure anytime we're talking about climate change, we're not talking about Obamacare.
We're not talking about ruined healthcare policies.
We're not talking about the IRS targeting the president's political enemies.
We're not talking about the NSA being involved in everything you're doing.
So they're all about the misdirection at the moment.
And I would like, do you know, I'm speaking to Republicans, I think this Saturday, is it?
Saturday, down in Nashua, is it?
I don't know.
Nashua, which is like northeastern, all the Republicans from the Northeastern states, whatever there are.
I think there's 17 of them or something.
I never knew there were that many states in the Northeast.
But all these Republicans from the Northeastern states all come in for the big kind of Northeastern Republican get-together.
And I've been asked to say a few words to them, which is always a mixed blessing for me because I can't understand why the Republicans don't push harder on this stuff.
Essentially, a big chunk of the Republican base was taken out of the game in the 2012 election.
In 2010, the Tea Party was incredibly effective, and it was so effective that the IRS decided to go after them.
And they're now proposing their response to the fact that they did not apply the tax laws of the United States equally.
And you can have a discussion about whether we should even have all these 501c3, 501c4 type stuff.
You can have that discussion.
I'd like it if we had a simple tax code so that we didn't have to have all these exemptions.
But in America, it's all about the exemptions because the purpose of life in the Republic of paperwork is to have more and more paperwork.
And that's a burden in and of itself, in and of itself.
You don't, as I always say, you don't need a president for life.
Leave that to the Latin American banana republics and the African basket cases.
You don't need a president for life if you've got a bureaucracy for life.
This bureaucracy has enormous powers.
It applies those powers whimsically and arbitrarily.
And insofar as you can justify the IRS having extraordinary powers to essentially destroy centuries-old legal concepts, basically to tear up Magna Carta and say to hell with eight centuries of legal process.
Say, we don't believe in due process.
We can just freeze your bank accounts.
We can just seize your assets.
The only ever-so slender justification for that is that on Monday, they'll seize the assets of Bud, the Tea Party guy, but on Tuesday, they'll be seizing the assets of Mildred, who is a director of Planned Parenthood.
In other words, they're equal opportunity government enforcers.
And we have now had a pattern on an industrial scale that has exposed the fact that they are not, in fact, equal opportunity abusers of due process rights, but that, in fact, they target one side, one side of the political spectrum only, to the point where they call into question the legitimacy of close elections.
Who knows how these things might have gone if one of the activist groups had actually been out there doing stuff instead of tied up filling in paperwork and reporting the reading habits of its members and what prayers were read out at churches and all kinds of things like that.
Why isn't the Republican Party, instead of merely, instead of merely just asking for the names of this or that IRS employee, just said, look, there's prima facie evidence here that the IRS is institutionally corrupt, institutionally corrupt, and therefore it has to be replaced by a non-institutionally corrupt revenue collection agency with far more circumscribed and limited powers.
The pushback isn't enough against this stuff.
We're in election stealing territory here.
We're in election stealing territory.
If you give money, if you make a donation to the president's opponents, the IRS will descend on you and all kinds of other agencies will descend on you too.
People have had the EPA and OSHA and everybody else sicked on them, mysteriously sicked on them all within a period of a few months because they made the mistake of supporting someone who does not have a D after their name.
That is full-blown banana Republican stuff and Republicans aren't manning up and actually taking a stand against this.
It's not about congressional oversight committees.
We're way beyond that.
There's no oversight of the IRS.
It needs to be gone and replaced with something with the limited powers that revenue agencies in other so-called civilized countries have.
Mark sign in for us.
More to come.
Kim Jong-un received 100% of the vote in North Korea.
And it turns out that that is not entirely unprecedented because in the 2012 presidential election in many cities in America, Mitt Romney received no votes whatsoever.
In Philadelphia, in 59 precincts, Mitt Romney received no votes.
Barack Obama received 100% of the votes.
Mitt didn't have a get-out-the-vote operation in Philadelphia.
He had a get-out-of-town operation in Philadelphia.
But Barack Obama is the Kim Jong-un of those Philadelphia precincts.
He got 100% of the vote.
Nine Cleveland precincts.
Barack Obama is also the Kim Jong-un of Cleveland.
You can do it here, folks.
▲
Export Selection