America's Mayor Live (863): The Latest on the Search for Nancy Guthrie Amid Mysterious Developments
Brittany Giuliani claims media downplays the February 10 Tumblr Ridge school shooting, where Jesse Van Rupsalar—a transgender teen with prior mental health hospitalizations—killed nine and wounded 27, suggesting woke bias suppresses such cases. She ties U.S.-Iran negotiations to past failures like appeasement of Hitler, accuses NY Governor Hochul of Marxist-driven homelessness policies, and attacks Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance as cultural decay. Epstein case allegations resurface, implicating Garland and Biden in political cover-ups while mocking Goldman’s redactions and Dan Nadler’s hearings. Giuliani’s rants blur fact with conspiracy, framing crises as ideological battles against "woke" governance and Trump’s enemies. [Automatically generated summary]
This is Brittany Giuliani, and this is America's Mayor Live.
Welcome.
We're very pleased and thankful that you're with us.
Last week, I have to thank you for having helped us set records for the number of people that watch America's Mayor Live, both live and as a podcast within 24 hours virtually, or maybe even just a little beyond that.
There was one where we got up to half a million, and there was another where we got almost to 5 million.
So I thank you for joining us.
And I will begin with doing what we do best, which is to give you a story and the details and the details of it, which is largely being concealed, at least with regard to its details and the emphasis that it deserves, because the woke, dishonest media, which is committed to censorship in favor of socialism, communism,
and Islamic extremism, is excluding this.
In this case, it would be the first two.
And that's with regard to the horrible and tragic shooting in Canada, the mass shooting in Canada, which would normally dominate the news, or at least even given the prevalence and the sort of interest and strength of the Guthrie story, would still be a prominent story.
And it's hardly covered.
And the shooting took place yesterday.
It took place in Tumblr Ridge, British Columbia on February 10th.
The shooter's name is Jesse Van Rupsalar, an 18-year-old local resident.
She killed her mother and a stepbrother at home, or he, and then went to Tumblr Ridge Secondary School and shot six more people, between 12 and 13 year old, and a teacher before turning the gun on herself.
The total dead, the total dead, let me make sure I have this right, the total of that were nine people, including her.
So this is an eight-person mass murder.
27 were wounded.
That's a big shooting.
And again, at a school.
It's confirmed by the RCMP that she's transgender.
She has described it as she was assigned male at birth, but she started transitioning six years ago and identified as male publicly.
And she now uses the pronoun she.
And throughout the briefing, the RCMP used the pronoun she for a biological male, but a clearly mentally ill person who, although a male, thought she was a female, the way you're Mary Jane Smith, but you think you're Martha Washington and walk around thinking that.
As for mental health, she had multiple prior police calls to the family for mental health issues, including worries that she would harm herself, even after she theoretically recognized her gender and therefore is supposed to be delivered from suicide.
And of course, the recent report from the Society of Plastic Surgeons says it's just the opposite, that when you administer so-called gender-affirming care, which could be a term coming from Orwell's 1984, it's just the opposite.
This is gender destruction care and mental health destruction care, where people become so hopelessly confused that the risk of suicide goes up rather dramatically, as between trying to give them a therapy that makes them comfortable what they actually are and will remain.
She was apprehended under the Province's Mental Health Act two or three times and hospitalized.
And however, she's out under circumstances that she's out under circumstances that we don't really understand.
So there's a lot to this.
Now, this is not the first in the last two years transgender mass murder in which the mass murder disappears when the person turns out to be transgender.
This is a problem.
This has until recently been considered by doctors and science as a mental illness.
What's the mental illness?
If you are a biological male or female and you think you're the other, in many cases, the person with such views is a paranoid schizophrenic or some form of that.
And also, therefore, much more significantly prone to violence than in a normal situation.
These are the pictures of her transformation.
I think at the shooting at the Catholic school, which was at the beginning of the school year, they were having a mass to celebrate the beginning of the school year.
Person who came in was transgender and shot up the children in the church and also the adults.
Although the focus there was the children.
When they did the report on the, I think also a male thinking she was a female, they mentioned that, but it was very buried and they blamed it on she didn't like or he didn't like children, even though he had gone to that school.
And it made in his writings, there's an awful lot about hating Catholics, hating the Catholic religion.
And there will get, I didn't want to make this some, this is not an attack on transgender people.
They had to be given a great deal of love and consideration.
The question is, what constitutes love and consideration?
Leading them to a situation where there's a much greater risk of suicide and a risk of committing murder?
Is that love?
Or is that some kind of political ideology that dominates you and moves you in that direction, requires you to go to that direction?
Because human life, morality and decency don't mean a damn thing to you.
That's true of Marxists, and it's true of a lot of socialists.
In fact, it is true of all socialists if they really follow the teachings of Karl Marx, who was himself an insane man.
So I do hope we have coverage of this.
And I do hope we realize that this is a risk that these numbers of cases have now brought to the forefront of a mental illness that's got to be taken seriously.
I mean, she was in hospital for some period of time.
But I suspect that like us, those laws were amended some time ago and are very permissive and have large numbers of mentally ill, dangerous people, dangerous to others and dangerous to themselves, walking the streets rather than being kept in hospitals, if necessary, against their will or against their parents' desires.
If they are a danger to themselves or to others, the rule used to be they can be put into a mental institution if they have a mental illness.
But when you define away the mental illness in the name of wokeness or political ideology, well, I mean, you may say and call it what it is, but the rigor of medical science exists irrespective of you.
All you're doing is creating a dangerous situation by labeling it opposite of what it is.
In many ways, it's much more direct problem and issue, but it's true throughout.
I know, like if you call the Department of War, the Department of Peace, as they do in 1984, or as Democrats do in just about everything they do, they mislabel it and lie about like gender-affirming care.
Regime vs. Agreement00:05:15
It's hardly that.
If they want to chop off your genitals or give you medicines to do that chemically, how's that gender-affirming care?
That's gender negation care.
So after that story, the president, although today it appears in his meeting with Netanyahu, the readout was that he is going to proceed with Iran from the point of view of negotiations.
You got to read between the lines because it, but I suspect I can interpret this to you, so we shorten it, take all the bullshit out.
And Bibi came to try to convince the president not to have an agreement with the Ayatollah and his regime because it's not worth the paper it's written on.
It's like at the point that the British and the French once did an agreement with Hitler.
They did two or three.
And after he violated the first, violated the second, then finally violated the third, we got a second world war.
We're at the point where it's beyond per adventure of a doubt that they're not going to keep their word.
Why would they start now?
They haven't in 47 years.
Their objective is to destroy us.
It's a religious imperative from the Quran.
And they take it seriously, where, God willing, a lot of other Muslims don't take it seriously, even though they do, in many cases, create this false picture of Muhammad as a perfect man.
He was a perfect man, if you think a perfect man should be a mass murderer or a pedophile.
However, we did something somewhat inconsistent with that.
We sent the second carrier to either the Mediterranean or the Indian Ocean right off Iran.
And we did it as saying, this is to assist the negotiations.
We sure as hell have enough of our Navy there to assist negotiations.
This carrier is not going to make a difference.
We already have a carrier group there that is quite sufficient to overcome Iran about four times over it.
And then we must have some definable percentage of our Navy within striking distance surrounding Iran.
We have battle groups in the Indian Ocean.
We've got battle groups in the Mediterranean.
And we have the famous infamous in the sense of what happened and infamous from the point of the people who attacked it, but extraordinarily famous because it survived the USS coal in the Red Sea.
and undetermined number of additional troops there.
We just increased them the other day.
So I don't know if you don't know if you have to look at this from the point of view, is this a setup?
We have a setup going on here, as happened before.
But I do know the president is an extraordinarily realistic man, and he's not going to reach an agreement if it's his thinking and he comes to the conclusion, whether all the people around him do or not.
He probably is getting conflicting advice on this.
But this is just not worth the paper it's written on.
Sometimes you could do that if it's a financial negotiation or a less important negotiation.
And then maybe you can find a way to get the person out or get around it or whatever.
This is too important.
It's been going on too long.
So my personal view, the first Ayatollah should have been removed after he humiliated this country under Jimmy Carter with the hostages.
President Reagan, who gets great credit for getting the hostages out, they released the mini came into office.
If there's one thing, if there's one thing he could do that he didn't do as president, and I suspect if he came back and realized all the killing of Americans that the regime did after that, in his eight years in office, he would have taken out the regime.
And then it should have been done by every president, Republican and Democrat, after that.
They all had the opportunities.
Some declined it, but did put pressure on them.
And some of them actually became the biggest financiers of the reign of terror.
That would be Obama and Biden.
There's no nation on earth that gave that regime more money than during that period of time than the U.S.
People on the Street00:16:00
And my opinion, that's what I'm here for, to give my opinion, right?
My opinion is that you're not going to ever have peace in the Middle East so long as there's a regime in Iran that is committed to the inexorable spread of Islam in accordance with the words of the Quran, which tell them to be permanent enemies with Christians, Jews, and those who do not practice their religion and to spread their religion by force,
which is the way they did.
So that would kind of get us to the mayor of New York, who is without any fear of exaggeration, a very strong supporter of Islamic extremism, including Hamas and groups like that who slaughter innocent people and children and are designated by the world as terrorist groups.
He's also, I think, admittedly, I don't know, but it does matter.
I mean, it's quite obvious, a dedicated communist.
And now we're at the point where 18 to 19 people have died because he reversed a policy that has existed since several decades before I was mayor of New York.
And that's the policy of taking people off the street, whether they agree or not, when the temperature is at or below or approaching, in some cases, freezing.
The leeway is, if it drops below 40, different mayors have used different thresholds.
I didn't really need a threshold, except when it got to below 40, I'd put a lot more resources into it and be a lot more focused on getting people off the street.
But constantly, I would take people off the street, no matter what the temperature was.
And this idea that there's some kind of constitutional right to live on the street, I found to be absurd and inhumane, indecent.
I used to think that mayors that used such reasoning were either cruel, mean people or more committed to disorder and creating chaos in America in accordance with their Marxist training.
But they sure as hell didn't care about human life and communists don't, which is why we have so much abortion in this country, which is why we keep going toward assisted suicide and killing people in order to get their organs and getting rid of people because they're getting too old or if they are in too much pain,
or all of that is the degradation of the value of human life, inconsistent with Western civilization and the two great religions that form Western civilization, Christianity and Judaism, and consistent with Karl Marx.
So we've become in many, many ways for many of these people.
The goal is a godless society where human life can be easily taken for the benefit of the state.
You look at Minnesota and you look at the first couple of months after they did their new abortion bill and you will find that Tampon Tim was killing babies that had been born, were put aside and weren't given any care.
You let them die.
And he changed the law so you didn't have to give extraordinary care and keep those babies alive when the abortion goes wrong and the baby gets born.
Now, I want you to think about that.
The baby gets born because the abortion goes wrong, which means before the abortion, the 10 minutes before the abortion and for some time before that, that was a human being in the womb, wasn't it?
If it's a human being when it comes out, what happened?
Did the air make it a human being?
Or did that happen in the mother's womb?
And now, given modern science, what we used to call premature births can be quite normal.
And premature can be startlingly early in the pregnancy, which means, however you define it, that life begins with conception or life begins at some point in the womb, that this becomes tantamount to a baby, certainly by six or seven months, that's true.
Then we commit murder in mass numbers.
We even encourage it.
We put people in jail who try to interfere with it, even in a peaceful way.
We're zealously committed to destroying human life.
So zealously that we put elderly women in who go outside of abortion clinics and pray.
So the idea that he would let people die on the street, it's just something that is built up within our country because we've been so undermined by Marxism and for the degradation of the value of human life.
So Michael Goodwin, who is one of the great columnists in America, one of the two very best in New York, wrote an enormously thoughtful piece today trying to point out, and Michael has covered mayors since before me.
I know Michael quite well, and he covered me, and I also consider him a friend.
And his wife worked for me on my first campaign, on my second campaign.
I had the honor of appointing her the head of a great college in New York, where she did a remarkable job.
Michael is an exceptional man with an exceptional intellect.
So he is, and he opposed the Mandami.
Even with that, I can detect here from a man who is enormously realistic and really brilliant.
I can detect shock at what this guy is doing.
He basically is disregarding the wisdom, so to speak, of 10 mayors, of which I am only one, and probably the one he hates the most.
I describe it this way.
Some of the most incompetent, dumb people who are mayor of New York were smart enough and decent enough to follow this policy, because some of the people on this list who follow this policy were extraordinarily dumb, extraordinarily incompetent, and did an actually horrible job.
But they understood that if somebody's living on the street and it's zero degrees, as the Post, a newspaper, the others don't cover this, demonstrated with an interview with a woman while it was zero degrees, and they want to remain on the street.
Oh, let's put it in the vernacular.
They're crazy.
They're not capable of making decisions.
They are, in the words of the statute that has been part of our conception of law since early England.
They're incapable of making decisions for themselves.
They're incapable of keeping themselves safe, keeping themselves alive.
And at that point, that's when the state can intervene to perform its duties as a Christian or a Jew or an effective contributing member of a civilization that values human life as inviolate.
And if it's got to be taken, there better be a hell of a reason for it and justification.
And so simple policy, let's get away from a theology and a philosophy, was that starting with Ed Kodch, at least, and I think to some extent even before that.
So one might say starting with John Lindsay and Abe Beam, but certainly articulated as a policy, starting with Ed Kodge.
And different mayors did it slightly different ways, but here is about as good a description that encompasses eight or 10 mayors.
As the temperature approached or reached freezing, and often it was, you know, as it approached it, because you got to get a lot of people off the streets.
You got to start.
You got to make some determinations.
And I did often enough.
So I'm very, very, I got second nature.
So all of a sudden, in the winter, if it starts getting cold, the first thing that happens in any mayor's office that has a human being is a mayor is the thought is, do we start picking people up?
Now, I didn't have to do that.
Well, I did actually in a way.
I picked people up anyway.
You have to understand that.
They would say I violated the consent decree that says people have a right to shelter and people have a right to live on the streets and people have a right to do none of which exist in the Constitution, none of which were passed by any legislature.
But a mayor, a predecessor of mine, who I respect, reached a decision for the city that I completely and absolutely disagree with.
And I'm a trained constitutional lawyer and lawyer, and a lot better than he was as a lawyer.
And I had to make my judgment for the people of the city.
They elected me, not him again.
And my decision for the city was that we're not going to follow that decree.
Take me to court.
They never did.
So I would take people off the street, usually when it was a difficult situation where there was resistance to it, with a police officer and a member of our homeless agency, or if we didn't have enough of those of our welfare agency, a social worker.
And they'd really evaluate the ability of the person to make a decision for themselves.
The ability of the person, if he's going to remain on, or she'll remain on the street, to find some lodging within a very short period of time.
But they wouldn't be allowed to remain where they were.
So if you were laying on the street, very, very simple, you don't have a right to do that.
Sorry.
Streets are not for living or sleeping.
Streets are not for defecating or urinating, which also happens with that, or stealing electricity and creating the possibility of a massive fire by breaking into the electrical apparatus for the streetlights and hooking your little portable television up to it, which they used to do when I became mayor.
The city had homeless encampments that were massive as I came into office.
By the time I left office, every homeless account was gone.
And we virtually didn't have homelessness.
And when I say didn't have, I don't mean sporadic and you can't catch all of it, but I mean homelessness in the sense of very, very definable numbers of people on the street.
And if we did have homelessness, it was in spite of me, not because of me.
I did everything I could with the resources I had to end it and develop lodging for people.
One of the reasons homeless people do not go to shelters, allegedly, is because they're dangerous.
Now, I can assure you, even when they were much more dangerous than I was able to achieve, it was much more dangerous to be on the street at 20 degrees.
It was much more dangerous to be on the street at 90 degrees because homelessness, when it extends too long, very, very often leads to a violent personality shift.
Certainly for the 30, 40, depending on how, putting on your biases, it could be as much as 50 or 60 percent of the homeless that are paranoid schizophrenics.
That's part of the disease.
Isolate them, keep isolating them, and they'll get violent.
They'll be a danger to themselves, but most importantly, also they'll be a danger to others.
Any extended period of time of isolation like that in a sort of unreal world, which is what Beyonter Street is, makes the paranoid schizophrenic much, much worse.
Now, what I'm telling you, a lot of Democrat mayors don't have either the intelligence or the heart to focus on or spend time on.
Nobody gives you money for doing what I just said.
There's no big fundraising group that gives you money because you end homelessness.
There's a lot of groups that'll give you money if you allow homelessness to go on.
Why is that?
Because those groups make a lot of money.
Because you get rid of homelessness, you get rid of a whole industry in this country.
A multi-billion dollar industry, possibly more.
These homeless contracts make people millionaires.
I'm sorry.
That's the truth.
I told you, you don't hear that most other places.
But most of the people who comment on radio and television haven't been the mayor of probably the worst city in the world when I took it over, or the worst city in America when I took it over, and left it the best city in America.
So when I say these things, this isn't some paid commentator.
These are things I did and for the reasons that I'm telling you.
And now to watch this man kill people is beyond anything that I expected.
And I should have thought of it.
I should have thought he was going to do this.
I mean, I knew, well, I did know that things were going to happen that I didn't anticipate and that people didn't anticipate.
But he should be removed from office immediately.
Now, that's useless because we have a governor, we have a governor of limited brain power and apparently of no conscience,
because she'll switch her position about anything at any time to get her miserable self-elected as a terrible, terrible, weak governor of a state that's in tremendous trouble with a budget that is two and a half times the budget of the state of Florida, which is bigger than the state of New York.
And that difference is largely attributed to systemic corruption of her political party.
Ready For Removal00:04:11
They steal the state blind.
And very often the focus of their stealing are programs for poor people, which is why people remain poor.
So we'll be back very shortly and we'll turn our attention to Bunny Bunny and what the hell is going to happen to him for all of the violations that he had of the code that governs broadcasting.
He wasn't on the internet.
He was on broadcast television that has strict codes as to what you can do and not do.
That has led in the past to people being thrown off.
At one point, during the Biden administration, if you said I'm in support of Donald Trump, they pretty much would attempt to throw you off or put you in jail.
So we'll be right back.
Here we are pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory.
It's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Jeep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
they're gonna go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so oh my goodness Look at these.
My goodness, you're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action.
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports, movies, news, even daytime dramas.
We're talking about ESPN, OAN, Newsmax, channels you can't get anymore in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Endless selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Wow.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly, where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to QUXNow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
Act fast.
These deals are selling out.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving our nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels of Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes now.
Donate 11 a month to tunnels of towers at t2t.org.
This is Rudy Giuliani and this is America's mayor live.
Uh, if you watch the Super Bowl on sunday, which many people thought was boring, I didn't.
I like a defensive game, but that there, but I also like a picture's duel.
Super Bowl Controversy00:06:57
So uh, i'm a little different um, but in any event, There was a halftime show which has become, I guess, more commented on and discussed in the game itself.
And that was done by someone.
I had no idea who this person was before, nor do I know most of these people that I consider spawned by Marxism because part of Marxism wants to destroy your culture and substitute a pseudo-culture for yours.
Well, they're pseudo-entertainers.
This is not entertainment.
This is shock.
This is shock performances intended to degrade our culture to something disgusting and something that would be equivalent in physical terms to a dirty bathroom.
This is not art.
This isn't uplifting.
This doesn't take you to ability to reflect on the deep questions of why and how, as opposed to just accomplishing some task.
It doesn't provide the mind expanding benefits of having the discipline to listen to a long thoughtful piece of music, which would make you considerably more intelligent and considerably wiser.
If you actually could sit through a one-hour mala concert and understand it, it would expand your intellect dramatically and your decision-making power.
Because it would give you something known as patience, which is critical very often to good decision-making.
But I can get very, very deep into this.
But the reality is that these people like Bunny Bunny or whatever his name is, have ruined our culture.
I mean, so that's my opinion, and people are entitled to theirs.
And they've been putting these people on Super Bowl shows forever where people want to watch football.
But now, I mean, there are many people that watch that who want to watch commercials.
Why exactly you want to watch commercials, I can't figure out.
They're all loud, crazy, stupid.
And I don't know that anybody ever buys anything based on some idiot yelling at you that you should get this car or some new medicine.
I mean, the new medicines are really extraordinary.
They tell you about the medicine, and somewhere in the whole required disclaimer, they tell you it'll kill you.
Everybody's wondered why you got the medicine.
If they're telling you it kills you, it can make you paralyzed.
It can make you insane or crazy.
You might want to commit suicide after you take this medicine.
But they hide that.
Then they show you, then they show a guy who looks like he's 105, and all of a sudden now he looks like he's 30 and he's with a beautiful young chick.
But in any event, Representative Randy Fine, who I'll use here as the basis for the allegations, accused his official name as Bad Bunny.
Is that it?
Bad Bunny?
Bad Bunny.
I don't know, Bunny Bunny or whatever.
Representative Randy Fine accused Bad Bunny of encouraging children to use cocaine and faulted him for dropping F-bombs in Spanish while calling on the Federal Communication Committee to investigate how NBC Universal and NFL allowed that indecent material to be broadcast.
Now, this is not without precedent.
I mean, people have been banned and they've been removed and fines have been leveled for things that you say on television or radio.
I remember that from being on radio.
There was in the WABC radio station a little button to cut out certain things that you might say that were against the Federal Communications Commission code.
Now, this has applied to a lot of people before this Neanderthal.
What Americans witnessed during the Super Bowl halftime show with Bad Bunny was despicable and never should be allowed to be shown on television.
He sang phrases such as El Perrico es Branco and El Tusa es Rosita, which refer to different types of cocaine.
So I believe the FCC took some action against him today.
Is that right?
This was written before that.
I'll take a look.
I didn't hear that.
Well, I guess they're being asked to.
And they should.
I should probably have a complaint section on the FCC website.
So they should treat it the way they've treated others.
He shouldn't be treated any differently.
But this is more a reflection on our culture, our civilization.
And would you want your child to be running around like this guy?
There he is.
If that's what you want as a child, I guess we've gone someplace in America that is very different than our grandparents had in mind or our founding fathers.
To me, this is some kind of a freak.
And this is, but please don't call this art.
This is not art.
This is a demonstration of the desecration of art, which is one of the necessary things that Marx requires in order to get yourself to an atheistic communist or socialist state.
This is exactly what he's talking about and writing about when he's saying, in order to take over a society, you've got to destroy its culture.
You've got to destroy all forms of beauty and replace it with shocking, ugly, distasteful, and immoral to amoral conduct.
So we're here for a very specific reason.
Didn't happen by accident.
It's happened because of the infiltration of communism in our society through any number of mechanisms that they infiltrated, including the now Democrat Party.
And for the first time ever, it's really open because we have communist mayors now elected as Democrats, and one of them in the largest city in the country.
Why Clinton Must Answer00:15:35
The congressional testimony of Pam Bondi today, which I covered in somewhat more detail on the prior show.
But the point that I want to make about it is, I mean, she was attacked in just a disgusting way by also, again, a group of people that you don't want your children to be like.
We'll pick one of them acting like an idiot.
But at any event, here's the point.
Epstein could have been prosecuted at any day within the four years that Biden was attorney, a United States attorney in Garland, who was pursuing Catholics and conservatives and trying to screw illegally and frame Donald Trump and prevent him from being president.
Garland had in front of him from the day he was attorney general until the day he left and desecrated the office of the Justice Department.
He could have investigated and prosecuted the people in the Epstein case.
All these eight or 10 victims who showed up claimed to be very upset with Trump and the way it's been handled.
But I mean, where's their anger at Joe Biden and Garland for doing nothing?
Trump has at least released this thing or put it out for public debate.
Also, I'd have to go look at the calculations and it might be different in different states, but Biden and Garland blew the statute of limitations by taking no action.
And nothing Trump can do about that.
Zero.
And these women are angry at Trump.
You don't think that's staged?
Well, of course it is.
You don't think every one of those louses that was up there today, some of whom are the most offensive people you've ever met, you don't have to sit in a room with some of them.
Four years of Garland going up there, they never asked him a single question about it at a time when you could more likely prosecute the case than now.
Not only does delay in a case run afoul of the statute of limitations, which completely extinguishes the case, but it also becomes a much worse case.
The longer a case is between the day it goes to trial and the day that it happened, the fewer witnesses there are, or as happened, people die.
Witnesses that were available aren't there anymore.
And if you delay a case the way they did for four years, you're trying to deliberately kill it.
Probably doing it because when you look at the people involved, it is by some amazing amount, mostly Democrats.
Now, I am not saying at all, and I think this is really unfair whether the Democrats or Republicans, that any of these people did anything wrong.
I don't know.
Here's what I know.
A lot of the people whose names are now out there did nothing wrong at all.
They thought they were dealing with a financial genius, whether he was or he wasn't, I have no idea, but people thought that, who made a lot of money for people.
Oh, I mean, that's nothing criminal about that or wrong about that.
And he presented himself like that to many, many people.
He didn't go around telling people, I'm a pedophile.
Would you like to give me $50 million to invest?
He might have done that with one or two people, but not with the vast majority of people.
He had parties of all kinds at his place, and he didn't go around saying, I chase after 12-year-olds, because most of the people of that party would have walked out or punched him in the nose.
And some would have asked to do it with him.
But the minority.
And in this group of people now who are being tarred and feathered, and their reputations are being ruined in a way that's absolutely inconsistent with all the rules of our justice system, most of them are completely innocent.
They're victims of defamation of their character when they do a damn thing wrong.
I mean, how about all the people that came to him who were Democrats that wanted fundraising?
They would have no idea that he was doing this, and he wouldn't let them know it.
He'd have been exposed much earlier than he was if he did something stupid like that.
He was actually pretty damn careful about who he let into that very, very perverted secret part of his life.
But the point is, this is being handled in a way that is completely inconsistent with America.
It isn't that Bondi and Trump want to do it this way.
They're being forced to do it this way by the courts and by the Democrats.
But the Democrats wouldn't do it at a time in which they could have done it the right way, which is bring cases in court and prove them.
And the people that you don't have evidence about, they should never be mentioned.
You can't destroy their character in the newspaper and not give them the benefit of the evidence against them and the witnesses against them.
And there's none.
If you want to look at the volume of proof and involvement, there's no one with more involvement than Bill Clinton or extremely, extremely suspicious situations, letters, and long-term involvement, even after it was clear that he was, he was, or at least, should I say clear, was he was convicted of being a pedophile and labeled that way.
But there's still no proof that Clinton participated in any that I know of.
Well, I guess that's wrong.
There is one or two of the so-called victims, I think, who say that Clinton wasn't, I think, I'm not sure.
But there's nothing that the prosecutors, including the Republican prosecutors, and certainly the Democrat prosecutors before that, think is worthy of prosecuting Clinton.
And much like in the four years that Biden was president, if there was anything there that would have allowed them to prosecute Trump, they would have done it.
The biggest indication that Trump is totally innocent is the fact that they didn't.
And I would say the same thing is true of Republicans.
They've now had it for a year, and nobody's brought a case against Clinton.
I'm no big fan of Clinton's, but he has to be treated like everybody else.
He's innocent until proven guilty.
And there's nothing I've seen that would prove his guilt.
But the very process of being involved in this, many, many people are going to convict you, whether you did it or not.
So today's show was despicable by a bunch of hypocrites that I have no idea why people keep liking him in the office.
From the time they tried to frame Trump with the Russian collusion to the time they made up the phony story about Ukraine And the Russian collusion story was paid for by a political operative, Hillary Clinton, in order to frame Trump to what they did with the January 6th, which you're eventually going to find.
They orchestrated.
I know, I know.
Well, Julietti's crazy.
And yeah, I've been proven to be right about everything.
Take a look at Georgia.
I'm right about that, too.
I knew it the night that it happened.
Which, if you go back and look at my podcast, you'll see I explained what it happened.
But in any event, the display today in front of the Attorney General was disgusting.
Can we put one of those animals on and just let them convict themselves from their own mouths, which is always the best way?
Right.
So this is from earlier today.
Pam Bondi, let's start with Dan Goldman, one of our favorites.
Here is Pam Bondi and Dan Goleman today on Capitol Bill.
Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
You're about as good of a lawyer today as you were when you tried to impeach President Trump in 2016.
Have you apologized for that in 2019?
So will you apologize?
Will you unredact this?
Will you unrelate this?
I'm asking you, will you unredact this?
Privileged.
Privileged, of course.
I look forward to discussing this more.
Now, these are obviously improper redactions.
Let me stop this.
I'm talking.
I'm not privileged.
Quiet.
Don't yell at me.
If they're not privileged.
Chairman, you stop the clock.
This is on your time.
It's not on Mr. Goldman.
They're not improper redactions.
You'll like my answer.
Continue to member.
I'm happy to release them.
We'll stop the clock.
We'll stop the clock.
Time belongs to the member.
Here we go.
Here's the photograph.
This is why he wanted to repeat everything that had been said previously on Epstein.
This is his state, New York.
You probably don't even know who this is.
Waheed Mohammed from Afghanistan.
Yes, because I'm no longer a prosecutor.
Convicted of assault.
Wow.
He represents New York.
Wow.
Yet he doesn't care about the illegal aliens convicted of crimes.
Assault and homicide.
No longer a prosecutor, so he doesn't care about his constituents.
Here we go.
Arson.
El Salvador.
Miguel Palacios.
Furman Flores Ramales.
Mexico.
Rape.
Let's talk.
I didn't.
The president said they invited him.
Mr. Chairman, please stop the clock.
Stop the clock.
Time alongside Simon Gentleman from New York.
We will give you a few more seconds.
We will do that.
But when you ask the question, the witness gets you may not like the answer, but she gets to answer.
The question was: how many of Epsom?
They don't like the answer, Chairman.
My time.
Because it's honest.
So he asked a four-minute question.
Restore 45 seconds, Mr. Naburn, please, Mr. Chairman.
You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch.
Not on our time.
No way.
And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.
You don't tell me.
Oh, I did tell you because you saw what you did in the Senate.
Not even a lawyer.
Committee will be in order.
We will give you a few more seconds.
I said that already.
45 seconds.
Okay, I'm timing right now, Mr. Clinton.
He talks about they indicted.
The president said they was over $50,000.
I don't know why you're laughing.
You're a great stock trader, as I hear, Raskin.
The Dow is over 50,000.
God, you would think he could buy better clothes if he's a big stock trader.
He always looks like a slob.
Oh, Nadler?
Yeah, Nadler.
Well, you've never had to sit in a room with him.
It is not.
I don't know how they don't have a little, even the Democrats.
I mean, Democrats have to be affected by the same odors that we're affected by.
And I don't know why they don't have him surrounded by like big things up and fumigation machines.
And the guy's a total slob.
Look at him.
There he is.
Total slob.
I mean, they actually must have put makeup on him or propped him up.
I mean, that's he's looking good there.
Usually much more of a slob than that.
And somehow keeps constantly emits foul odors and then falls asleep.
I don't know if we have any of the pictures of him sleeping.
I don't know if he snores.
He looks like the kind of guy that probably snores to, but he falls asleep constantly during hearings and was doing it way back during the January 6th.
He was part of the criminals that handled the January 6th.
By the way, this happened today.
This is from our very own Allison Steinberg.
We got Nadler sleeping.
Wow, this is from today.
Allison is terrific, but this is like shooting.
Above all else.
Yeah, there he is.
This is today.
Wake up, you.
Someone wants to wake him up.
Wake up, pig.
We should probably be dreaming about some kind of food going to happen.
Once again, hey, go wake them up.
They're filming them.
2025.
Great little Allison.
We're going to retweet that.
We're going to post that.
I'm going to find that right now.
Probably.
Probably the guys at Congress and they got a camera on you.
You better wake up.
That's amazing.
Well, there are, there are.
Might as well find some others.
There are so many pictures of him sleeping.
And it's probably better because when he's awake, he gets confused.
He gets very, very confused.
And by the way, this is not old age or maybe it's like that 30 years ago.
In fact, he was fatter 30 years ago and dirtier, I think.
I mean, somebody puts him in a shower now before they let him come out.
There he is.
I don't think this is him today, but here's another one.
His colleagues will tell you he's kind of offensive to be around.
Is that today?
I don't think, to be fair, this is any day.
This is just any day.
This is what they're paying for.
People in New York are paying for that guy to go up there and sleep every day to take a nap during the day, which really makes no difference because if he's awake, he's probably engaged in some kind of conspiracy to frame people.
I mean, his participation in the impeachment was completely fraudulent.
And knowing that what he was doing was a complete lie.
Well, we want you to go over to, we want you to go over to Lindell TV to see the Dr. Maria show, which is going to start in a minute or two, a few minutes, actually.
So there's a lot to cover.
We're at the beginning of the week.
Lindell TV: Dr. Maria Show00:10:27
We're going to have to see what develops with the Guthrie case.
They now have found, they believe the glove.
It'd be premature to say it's going to yield a great deal of evidence, but it could.
It's very possible that you're going to get some DNA out of that.
You might be able to narrow the purchase of it.
Tucson is not a gigantic city the way New York is.
You have the video and the video is quite.
Well, I mean, the video, when I say the video, is quite revealing.
It isn't as revealing as if you had a picture of him completely, but you can get it pretty close to that with identifying characteristics that will help you narrow down who he is.
Someone who knows him well would be able to look at that and probably think of a good friend or relative that you really know well, the way they walk, their mannerisms.
There's enough of a look at the eyes and the mouth.
There's a really good chance you'd have a notion that this is the person you know.
And should you zero in on suspects, you'll be able to do even further analysis of whether it's them having this video.
Now, it turned out wrong with, or maybe I assume they picked him up on the suspicion that he was the guy.
And his mother-in-law said he looks like the guy.
I don't know if I'd want that mother-in-law.
It sort of justifies the police conduct because in order to be not liable for false arrest, they have to have some kind of reasonable basis for what they did.
And the mother-in-law sort of supplied the evidence that it's reasonable because he sort of looks like the guy.
Well, before you prove it's the guy, you're going to arrest somebody who sort of looks like him.
That's the way you get there, right?
And in this particular case, it went wrong, and it's a shame.
But I have no reason to believe that it isn't just an ordinary operation of good police work, that you check down whatever you got.
And particularly in a case where I think we forget because so much time has gone by.
We have to operate on the theory that she's still alive and can be saved.
So time, even though a lot has gone by, is of the essence.
And we're going to have plenty of time to re-examine the mistakes that were made, which are plenty, including just exactly why we're dealing with this video so late in the game.
And at a time when it's less likely it's going to result in saving her life than if we had it earlier.
Every day that goes by, it's less likely.
And that's why they have to move quickly.
People were justifying their taking him into detention on the theory they have to move quickly.
Well, I mean, that's relative, isn't it?
I mean, they haven't moved quickly, and that's history now.
And there's nothing you can do about it.
Or allowing the crime scene to be violated is not some kind of a minor thing.
Here's why.
You will never know what you lost by people trampling over the crime scene.
You'll never know.
You don't know what you don't know.
And the crime scene is preserved that way because the littlest things have been known to solve cases.
And if people are walking back and forth, and they can be extinguishing the little things, like enough of an impression so that you can get an analysis of a shoe Or something dropped that when people walk around, they kick it around and it either gets destroyed or it disappears into the dirt, and you're not going to find it.
Bloodstains, if they were as faint as the ones that were discovered, can easily be wiped out if you start walking over dirt and hard to recover blood from dirt anyway, or see it more than to recover it.
I can go on and on, but the point is that the violation of the crime scene for some lengthy period of time before the FBI was brought in is inexcusable.
And again, inexcusable because time is of the essence.
And we'll know if practically it affected things ultimately based on when we find out what actually happened.
Is she alive?
In which case, these things should still be fixed because inherently they hurt you, but at least it isn't as terrible a result.
Is she dead?
And when did it happen?
So let's pray that she's alive.
I agree that this case is probably going to be solved.
I find it interesting and somewhat unprofessional that so many law enforcement people come on and say it will definitely be solved.
They have no idea if it's going to be solved or not.
And I do believe that the odds are extremely worth solving it now that you have this video.
It isn't a giveaway, but it provides enough evidence that can be dug from it that it's likely they're going to narrow it down and find the person.
One of the things they thought they had last night that would have been extraordinary was the car.
And if you have the car, you can trace it right to today, but they don't have the car.
Carlos looks like, I mean, I'd be shocked if he's involved in it, given the fact that he was released and the way he conducted himself.
So we'll be back tomorrow night.
And who knows, maybe they will be able to solve it by then.
Maybe they will.
And maybe we can save her.
Look, stranger things have happened.
And God works in strange ways.
So let's, as they say in the Bible, God's ways are not ours.
And therefore, far be it for me to say that I can understand them, nor can you.
Let's pray for her.
Let's pray for the recovery of Mrs. Guthrie.
And then let's pray for the people of Iran and the people of Israel and the people of Ukraine and our people and the president of the United States, who, again, today is being burdened.
But of course, he is magnificent at it, of making almost inhuman decisions.
So give him the courage and the strength and the wisdom that he's going to need because it comes from you ultimately.
He's an exceptional man, but he, like all of us, couldn't do it without you.
So dear God, guide our president.
Have your hand on his shoulder.
And we'll see you tomorrow night.
Go right now.
Come on.
Right over to Lindell TV.
Or you can get Dr. Marx, I guess, right?
But it's probably better if you go to Lindell TV on that one.
And come back here tomorrow at 7, at 8, also at 7.
God bless America.
It's our
purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
Common Sense Then and Now00:01:04
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.