The Rudy Giuliani Show: Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Rudy Giuliani dissects a dormant crime case after a distinctive mitten-style glove—potentially containing DNA—was found 1.5 miles from the scene, while Carlos’s calm demeanor during questioning suggests innocence. He criticizes Democrats for disrupting U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi’s hearing and ignoring Epstein-linked figures like Hakeem Jeffries, linking DOJ delays to expired statutes of limitations. The Save America Act’s House passage (218-213) highlights partisan election fraud concerns, though Senate approval seems unlikely. In a private Trump-Netanyahu meeting, Iran’s deal-breaking history under Sharia law looms as Netanyahu pushes for aggressive U.S. action, while Trump hints at nuclear talks with dire warnings. Economic strength—record jobs and stocks—contrasts with suppressed crises like Canada’s mass murder and Ukraine’s drone attacks, urging viewers to seek uncensored truth to avoid political manipulation. [Automatically generated summary]
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindell TV.
Well, it seems like right before we come on or anybody else comes on, there's always a development in this case recently, after it was dormant for four or five days and nothing happened.
Now, apparently, and by the way, that's predictable given the video they put out yesterday, which was a much bigger breakthrough than people realize.
Kind of subdued because of what people will think was a mistake in the arrest of Carlos.
But really, that's going to happen probably a few times before you get the right person.
And they did handle it appropriately by being very, very careful as to what they named him, what they called him.
In fact, during the time that he was being questioned, most of the discussion on all of the television networks was, what is he?
He's not a suspect, which therefore lifts that label from him, right?
They didn't call him a person of interest, which is the other word they usually use, right, for somebody who's not a suspect.
And therefore, a person of interest could be either of interest because they're a witness or of interest because they're the guy who did it.
They called him nothing.
Actually, I guess you could translate the verb that he was detained, right, into he's a detaine.
Now, what the hell is that?
Well, that's somebody being held against his will, probably.
That's why he was detained, but not necessarily.
I mean, he could be detained, but agree, which when you listen to him, sound like it might be possible.
He seemed very agree, like a very agreeable young man.
And of course, it means nothing because the person who did this could appear to be a very agreeable young man or older man and still be a murderer, a killer, insane, or whatever the hell else.
But when you listen to him last night, he didn't sound like a killer, did he?
He sounded like a pretty open and like totally stunned that he was arrested and in a ridiculous, a ridiculously calm mood for having just been put through what for most people would be hell.
And very unlikely, had he been involved in, he would have gone ahead and held a press conference.
And inadvisable for him to do it, even though he is apparently not guilty and not involved, and I'm sure would like people to know that.
But in many ways, he just got a lot more people to know him than would ever know him if he hadn't appeared on television.
And thinking he cleared himself, that's true, but then a certain percentage of people will just think he's involved no matter what.
This is what happens in these things, and it's what happens when people pay partial attention, and then his name comes up, and then they just remember he, oh, he was involved, and he got a, they'll probably translators were arrested.
So if I was his lawyer, and he didn't have a lawyer, I would have, I would have, I would have said, look, don't, don't do a press conference.
If we want to explain how innocent we are, we'll put a statement out.
Or the lawyer will speak, the lawyer will speak for you a bit.
But he went ahead and he did it.
It wasn't terrible.
I mean, he made a good impression.
Now, his, was it his, was it the woman, his aunt who was, his mother-in-law was speaking for him about him during the process of his being detained.
And I don't think she's, you know, there's always a prototypical mother-in-law, typical mother-in-law who supposedly hates your son-in-law, right?
And didn't sound like that, but she certainly delivered some really difficult things for him, like he looks like the guy.
First of all, I don't think you can really tell whether he looks like the guy.
Take the whole face away.
All we saw of the guy was his eyes and his eyebrows.
The eyebrows are much thinner than his, by the way.
The eyes, you can't really tell, but there's nothing definitive about the eyes.
I don't know how tall he is or how big he is, but he appears to me to be smaller than the man in the Halloween outfit or whatever the hell that was.
Now, again, that could be completely erroneous because he could have a lot of padding on or bulky clothes on.
Sometimes it looks like that when you see him, sometimes it doesn't.
But now he's out of it so far.
There's nothing that suggests that he's involved.
And they announced this just a short while ago that the police or the FBI discovered a glove appearing to look like the glove that we see all over the video, right?
This is supposedly a mile and a half, 1.5 miles from the scene, which is a fairly typical mistake that a not very experienced burglar break-in man or criminal would make.
Throwing your gloves away after all of the trouble the guy took with what appeared to be extraordinarily overdone gloves.
Like one wonders how he would have gotten his gun out with those gloves that he had on.
They were mitten type gloves.
You can't put your finger on the trigger unless it's caught of an Alec Baldwin gun that goes off by itself, in which case he would have been able to accomplish that had he talked to or had he consulted the scholarship on the Alec Baldwin case in which the bullet came out of the gun and killed the girl, but Alec never pulled the trigger.
And maybe, I'm not expert enough to know whether that can happen with a gun.
I just find it rather extraordinary.
But in this case, this thing, if he had to reach to get the gun out with those big mittens on, they would have to have come off.
It looked like it would be a hell of a process to take it off.
And then you could grab the gun.
Again, indicating we don't have the most experienced break-in man here.
And of course, no one can be sure that that's the glove.
If it is, then they have another breakthrough, because it is highly likely then that that contains the DNA of the guy.
It depends on the glove, what it's made of, but the glove looked like it was pretty darn tight.
Now, there is also a caveat there, which is always true when you really don't know.
It did look like that, whatever that is, was covering other gloves.
And it's possible that in the whole process, he never touched it with his skin, in which case it's not going to yield very much.
Maybe that's why he threw it away.
So we'll see.
I also don't know how distinctive those gloves are in the sense that in that area, remember, that's not New York.
It's not Los Angeles.
It is a big city, but it doesn't have endless numbers of stores.
And you might be able to narrow where that glove could be purchased in the area of Tucson, Arizona.
So let's see what happens with the gun, with the gloves, and let's see how much more they pick up as a result of this video, which they are examining with a fine tooth comb that we only can guess at, meaning that if this were 20 years ago, we'd have a pretty good idea of what's available to them.
But with AI, with all of the intricate process now of examining fiber and material and, I mean, for example, with paper, even rather inexpensive paper, to an expert, it would become very distinctive.
So you could take two fairly inexpensive pieces of paper and using a technology, which is similar to microscopic technology, you could tell that they're two different pieces of paper, that they come from different manufacturers.
You wouldn't think that it'd be possible with inexpensive paper, but it is in most cases.
Everything is in most cases.
Inexpensive Paper Analysis00:14:42
So today we had a visit to the White House by Bibi Netanyahu, which we'll cover in a bit.
But also we had a rather long and I think unbelievably wasteful testimony by the Democrats in Congress from Pam Bondi, in which the Attorney General of the United States, who was pretty damn busy having to bring cases that everybody on top of were not bringing fast enough.
And they really didn't ask her any questions.
They made statements attacking her and then didn't want to listen to her, What appeared to me valid response, they were extremely rude and just the kind of people you would want your children to grow up to be.
But Allison Steinberg is going to, you're going to cover that for us, right, Allison?
The horrible way in which the members of Congress, including the one from Roly Poly from New York.
And no, no, no, it's good.
He actually got through that without spitting on people, which he usually does.
But they were, I mean, they were just, they like display themselves like if you're bringing up a kid, you don't let him listen to that.
Or you say, well, you don't want to, that's a good example, what you don't want to grow up to be.
You want to learn how to say yes, ma'am, no, ma'am.
Please excuse me.
And even if you're having a fight with a man or a woman, you should conduct yourself as a gentleman or a lady.
They were far from that.
Well, that's just par for the course for these Democrats.
They are tyrants and they're sycophants, and they literally get off on just listening to themselves, I guess.
I mean, the point was to bring in Pam Bonnie to testify, give updates on the DOJ, talk about some of the Epstein stuff.
They asked questions and didn't even begin to let her answer.
It was so chaotic.
I was actually in the room for this.
You would think if Democrats cared half as much as they claimed to, they could maybe at least stay awake.
But Jerry Nadler was dozing off virtually the entire time.
He's been doing that for years.
I know.
I know him quite well.
In fact, I worked with him when he was a member of Congress and I was mayor on the tunnel project.
Really?
So he had to have been 20 or 30 years younger then.
But he was equally as like unpleasant to be next to.
Let's put it that way for any number of reasons that I'd rather not mention.
You didn't look forward.
Oh, I have to meet with him.
Okay.
Yeah.
And please, do you mind staying a little further away every once in a while?
Some strange odor gets emitted from you.
Yes, I'm sure he was passing.
I guess a guy like that gets mean.
A guy like that who's been going around life like that and people, including the Democrats behind his back, have been saying that for years, gets me.
He gets mean.
He's a very mean guy.
I mean, he contradicts himself.
He's really like the evil penguin in the Batman babies.
I mean, he literally looks like it and he lives up to it character-wise.
He's not a nice guy.
I mean, we have a clip.
Let's play the clip.
Pam Bondi was asked a question.
She tried to answer.
She got into this whole spat with Jerry Nadler.
And this is just like how it went for the entirety of the hearing.
Yeah, they were all summary.
It wasn't necessarily the worst.
There are a couple of others that I'm not as familiar with.
They're even worse.
Raskin.
Yeah, I mean, they were even nastier than because Nadler read it.
I mean, everything he, I'm not sure.
He read everything.
I really hate you and you're disgusting and you're terrible.
And, you know, he just read it all.
Yeah, pretty much.
I mean, that's the best we could hope for coming from him.
He can't, you know, think for himself, heaven forbid, you know, go off the script for once.
He was reading.
But let's watch this stuff.
This is a good summary of how the whole hearing went the entire time.
The president said they indicted him to be aware of it.
Mr. Chairman, please stop the clock and stop the clock.
Okay, here we go.
We can please.
We will give you a few more seconds.
We will do that.
But when you ask the question, the witness gets you may not like the answer, but she gets to answer.
The question was, how many of Epsys?
I don't like the answer, Chairman.
It's my time because it's honest.
So he asked a four-minute question.
Restore 45 seconds, Mr. Navin, please, Mr. Chairman.
You can let her filibuster all day long, but not on our watch.
Be clear.
Not on our time.
No way.
Be clear.
And I told you about that, Attorney General, before you started.
You don't tell me.
Oh, I did tell you because we saw what you did in the Senate.
Not even a lawyer.
Committee will be in order.
They should get back at least 45 seconds.
We will give you a few more seconds.
I said that already.
45 seconds.
Okay.
I'm timing right now.
I like the way Jordan maintained a kind of a smile on his face.
Like, there's a bunch of clowns, but the reality is, Allison, she's had the case now for about a year.
They had the case for four years.
Yeah.
And a much more important four years.
It could very well be that there are some cases there.
The statute of limitations has run out.
It's not endless, depending on the crime and on how serious the crime they can prosecute.
And they would have run out because Biden wasted four years.
And some of these go back to start with five, six, seven, eight years.
And the Biden administration, if the statute of limitation has been blown here, it was blown well before there was ever a Trump administration.
Now, as she pointed out, and I was really interested in that, she did say that the prior attorney general, who was one of the most crooked attorney generals in history, the prior attorney general was never asked a question about the case.
And he had it for four years.
Exactly.
I think I don't remember him being asked a question.
I actually almost can't believe that.
It is shocking.
I mean, you would think if Democrats really cared so much about this, that they would have brought it up a little sooner, to your point.
They wouldn't just wait until Trump is in.
They obviously think that they've got Trump now, but I think that is proving to not be the case.
The more that is released from these files, we're learning that Trump's totally innocent and all this.
Now, maybe others, not so much.
I think, you know, people are frustrated about Howard Lutnick, perhaps, concerns about Steve Bannon, people who are mentioned repeatedly, but not Trump.
I mean, we can clear Trump, I think.
It's safe to say if they had something on Trump, they would have done something a long time ago, and they didn't.
So now it's all just one political charade for them.
The Democrats are putting on a show.
They're getting their 15-second talking points in so they can post a little video to social media and pretend like they, you know, stood up to Pam Bonnie and that's that.
It's just really pathetic.
And I think, you know, there is some rightful frustration in all of this because I think ultimately for the victims and the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein, they would like to see more done.
They were present today in the hearing and they seem to think that not enough is being done.
They don't feel like justice is truly being served.
To Thomas Massey's point, who was there today, he's saying that, you know, certain names were redacted that shouldn't have been and others that should have been.
So basically, he's trying to allege that the DOJ is protecting the criminals and not the victims here.
But I just think the whole thing's a mess.
I think we have a little bit more work to do.
I think this is going to be an ongoing conversation.
I think there's a lot to still hash out here.
And unfortunately, I don't think a whole lot was actually resolved in this hearing today.
Just total confusion.
And the reality is the whole process that's been forced on the Justice Department is inherently going to produce tremendous, much more unfairness than it's going to bring justice to everyone.
I don't know how many names there are.
They say there are a million pages.
That's extraordinary.
I've never dealt with a million pages before.
But if any group of human beings, including the Brightest, have to do something with a million pages, they're going to make a certain percentage of mistakes, no matter how good they are, no matter how careful they are.
And she was trying to make a point.
I would have loved to have heard the rest of it because we could check the accuracy of it, that their level of error here was less than average or normal.
In other words, they did a much better job than normally would be the case.
I would love to have heard that.
And then we could go test it and see if Pam is correct or exaggerating or telling the truth.
But they forced this, the Justice Department didn't want to do this because they knew it would tar the reputation.
I mean, there are probably a hell of a lot more innocent people on that list than guilty people.
And I'm assuming there are some pretty darn awful people on that list and guilty people.
But I would imagine the majority, from what I know of the case, the majority of those people were dealing with him as a financier and as a collector and as a very, very major fundraiser, which meant he raised money for the Democrat Party.
Those are going to be a lot of legitimate contacts.
Well, that's true.
Including ones that look like friendship.
I mean, yes, absolutely.
To that point, we're now seeing photos surface of Hakeem Jeffries sitting down to dinner with Jeffrey Epstein.
So where is the Democrat outrage towards that?
I mean, would that warrant an investigation into Hakeem Jeffries?
I should think so.
But of course, you know, Democrats are so hypocritical.
It's rules for the, not for me.
So when it involves them, Stacey Plaskett, another sitting member of Congress, repeatedly mentioned in the files, they don't care.
They only care when they can skew it and smear it to fit their ridiculous agenda.
It's stupid.
Well, everything else quiet in Washington today?
Not at all.
I do, I want to give you a quick update on the Save America Act because I know we've been covering this relentlessly.
That's another, I don't understand that one.
Okay, well, tell me that about that.
Well, I have a good update for you.
We finally got it brought to the floor for a vote in the House, and it officially passed as of just about an hour ago.
It passed the House.
All Republicans, it was a 218 to 213 votes.
So every single Democrat voted against it.
I was actually in attendance at a press conference today with the Black Congressional Caucus, and they're now going so far as to say that the Save America Act is flat out racist, which you just have to laugh at.
But that didn't seem to hinder the votes today at all.
Republicans stood their ground.
Thankfully, they were all united in this to get this passed.
Now it goes on to the Senate where we're probably going to see the bulk of the issues start to surface.
I think there's 40 Republican senators now who are on board who have co-sponsored the Save America Act, but we're still waiting on holdouts like Lisa Murkowski, Susan Collins, Mitch McConnell, the standard rhinos that are vehemently opposed to it.
So there's still a lot of work to be done.
It's my hope and my prayer that President Trump really starts to put the pressure on and lays it down to Senator Thune, tells him, get this passed or else, right?
So we'll see what happens.
It'll be an interesting few weeks ahead as it sits in the Senate now.
And hopefully they can actually finally eliminate this zombie filibuster once and for all, open up the floor for debate, force Democrats to talk and state their opposition, and then actually go forward, vote, and get it passed, signed by the president.
So we'll see what happens there.
You know what's really, what's really strange to understand?
75% of Democrats agree with the act.
92% of Republicans, 85% of Independents, 85% of Blacks agree that you should be required to produce identification when you vote.
It's remarkable because this is not the only instance in which Democrats unanimously went against the will of their party, the almost, almost unanimous will of their party.
They do it on school choice, too.
Exactly.
75% of Blacks and 80 plus percent of Hispanics are in favor of vouchers for schools.
They are completely opposed to the teachers' union.
They actually feel the teachers' union is racist.
They may be right or wrong about that.
That was true when I was mayor of New York.
It's true today.
So, but they vote against it.
Black parents in New York will complain like hell that they're applying to charter schools and they won't allow another charter school to be developed.
And the only reason for that is the Democrats block it.
But then those are the people they vote for.
So they've learned how to buffalo and fool their constituents and double-cross them and get away with it, which is extraordinary.
I mean, it's extraordinary.
It should be.
This is actually a matter of common sense.
The only reason that the only reason you don't want it is you can, we know how they cheat.
They cheat by producing phony registrations.
So if you had identification, well, you can't have dead people voting if you have identification unless they know something that we really don't know, unless they're really extraordinary, unless they can deal with it.
I think that's ultimately what it has to boil down to.
That's why they are fighting so hard to stop proof of ID to vote in our elections, which is just stupid.
But I actually, I just want to play this last clip really quickly.
It's a short one.
I did ask a member of the Black Congressional Caucus who just got done saying the Save America Act is racist.
I asked her specifically about what you're talking about, the fact that over 70% of Black Americans support voter ID.
Voter ID Support00:04:47
She thinks it's fake news all of a sudden.
Watch this.
You just stated that the Save Act is an attack on civil rights and is racist.
Could you just explain that further?
Because 76% of Black Americans support the SAVE Act, according to CNN.
Is that correct?
Yeah.
Well, we find it racist because at the end of the day, it's targeting Black communities with a cost burden.
We've been through this historically, right?
Where we've been prohibited from voting because we didn't know how many bubbles were in a soap bar.
And so this is just a new iteration of that.
And we're very focused on defeating it.
But if 76% of Black Americans support voter ID, I don't believe that's 76%.
CNN reports.
That's possible.
But I do not agree with it.
So I guess it's fake news only when she disagrees with it.
Otherwise, CNN is right 99% of the time.
But this time they're wrong.
So I thought that was hilarious, but it just goes to show how out of touch the Democrat Party truly is with their base.
I mean, we have these members.
This is a Pew Research poll.
It is well documented.
And she now, you know, when it doesn't align with her agenda, now she suddenly disagrees with it.
So it's just so ridiculous.
We have to laugh.
We're going to play a little bit of a video that goes back a bit where blacks from my native city were interviewed about this.
And it seems to me that the 76% may be wrong.
It may be more like 95.
Well, thank you very much.
Allison, you did a great job.
Thank you.
Thank you.
going to take a short break and we'll be right back.
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels and reduce swelling in your legs and feet, then this message is for you.
Peer Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again.
And two of their best-selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds, and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
It supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is lymph system support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles, and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients and lymph system support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off Liver Health Formula and Lymph System Support, along with 50 plus other health supplements that Pure Health Research has to offer.
So head over to PureHealthResearch.com and use promo code Lindel at checkout.
That's PureHealthResearch.com.
Promo code Lindel to save 35% on your order today.
Too many pharmacies and insurance companies are blocking the medications that actually work.
That's why I recommend All Family Pharmacy.
They give you access to treatments like ivermectin now starting at just $2 a capsule.
They also have methylene blue, hydroxychloroquine, and so much more.
They're helping you stay prepared and they've dropped their prices by 25%.
Also use promo code Lindale10 to save even more.
Go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Lindel.
Use promo code Lindale10 and get the medicine you need.
It's finally here, our second annual mega sale.
This sale only comes around once a year, so take advantage of the best offers ever while you can.
For example, save 50% on our Giza Dream bed sheets, as low as $29.98.
And for the first time ever on TV, MyPillow Mattresses and MyPillow Mattress Toppers as low as $99.98.
And you save 50% on our Lux Pure Six-Piece towel sets.
Regular $69.98, now only $39.98.
And our best-selling standard MyPillows, regular $49.98, on sale for $17.98.
Wait on it, mega sale, only $14.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to take advantage of our second annual mega sale.
But wait, there's more.
To make the mega sale even more special, when you order right now, your order's going to ship absolutely free.
125th Street Fraud Claims00:06:14
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Want to know what's happening right now?
The Now Playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup including Lindel TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level.
From faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Now I'm here in East Harlem to ask black people their thoughts on what you just heard.
Do you have ID, normally?
You carry IDR?
Yes, that's state ID.
Do you carry ID?
Yes, I do.
Do you know anybody, any black person who doesn't carry ID?
No.
Everyone that I know has an ID.
Why would they think they don't have ID?
That's a lie.
Why would they say that?
Do you have ID?
Yes.
Because I have my ID and my friends have their ID, so we know what we need to carry around.
Everybody that I know have ID.
Like, that's one of the things you need to walk around with New York with.
ID.
Do you know any black adult who does not have ID?
No, I don't.
Is it a weird thing to even say that?
Yes, it is.
What is this?
Some type of trick candy cameras?
I know, right?
That's the only thing I brought with me.
Those are legit IDs.
I heard a lot also that black people can't figure out how to get to the DMV.
What's that saying to you?
I know it's that 25th year.
Do you know where the DMV is right now?
It's on 125th Street.
I challenge you to do.
You can do that if you want.
that does go first let me tell you that goes back about four years because when it came up during the uh 20 no it goes back a few years about three years uh It was during the 2024 campaign that was done.
I think we put it out.
I think, yeah, during the 2024 campaign.
And every one of those locations, I could tell you exactly where it is on a map on 125th Street.
But that is absolutely correct.
And that's the answer you'll get uniformly anywhere from seven to nine out of ten times for any American, black, white, in between.
I'm even surprised.
As I said, 76%, I think it's, that sounds more like it's 100%.
Also, some blacks, not all, are insulted by the thought that, well, they can't really, they really, they've gone on and suggested they really know how to print things and they don't have printers available.
And they, a number of other things, the blacks, or they wouldn't really know how to find the place where to do it.
Every single one of them knew exactly where it was and were able to tell the guy where it was.
It was at the Department of Motor Vehicles on 125th Street.
And that was within a block or two of where they were.
And of course, they needed to get welfare.
So unfortunately, and this is why you got to be careful.
You got to go beyond just ID.
You got to check the records carefully.
A lot of people who were a lot of people who are non-citizens, particularly now, the welfare roles are overwhelmed by non-citizens and illegal aliens, including in certain cases in multiple situations.
So they have plenty of ID.
They may have four or five different IDs if they're part of the welfare fraud situation.
So this is absurd.
And it's intended, and it really is about as blatant as it can get.
It's intended because they're the party of election fraud.
And you only can really do an effective massive amount of election fraud through paper ballots.
Even if you can fix a machine, there's a range really where it becomes absurd.
But you're going to see it like in Antrim County, Michigan, where it became ridiculous that Biden won.
Nobody had won that county since before the Civil War.
No Democrat had won that county since before the Civil War.
I guess too many people in Michigan died at the hands of the Democrat Party during the Civil War in that part of Michigan.
And therefore, the vote was like they knew it was fraudulent the morning they woke up and they found out Biden had won.
And then it turned out that the machines had a glitch.
Yeah, they had a glitch, all right.
Watch the movie Killchain, which takes place two years before the 2020 election.
And listen to the now candidate for governor of Minnesota, Kolbuchar, who basically says about these same companies that we're talking about, that they are dangerous and they're fraudulent and that they're allowed to fix elections.
Of course, that was all suppressed at the time that we were raising this and litigating it.
Well, in any event, the SAVE Act is going to pass the House, or has, I guess it has passed the House, with a very, very solid Republican vote and a very solid Democrat vote in favor of election fraud.
And now it's going to go to the Senate.
And I should have asked Allison this, but I think even if Soon were to get all five, six, seven Republicans that are still on the fence, including some that we almost never get, I think this is something we have to get 60 votes.
Iran Nuclear Meeting00:11:18
I think you need a couple of Democrats, no matter what, to get this through the Senate.
And we know where it comes to doing things that are fraudulent and dishonest, they stick together like glue.
Just think of all the Russian collusion votes and the votes against Trump that were intended to remove a newly elected president based on evidence they knew was false.
How often do they stick together unanimously?
Republicans tend to not be quite as unanimous because, as I said, one party is systemically crooked and the other occasionally.
And there's a big difference.
It really is a big difference.
And you can avoid it if you want, but it's to the detriment of this country.
The economy is a number of different signs have the number of different signs have come up.
And we're going to cover that.
But first, we're going to talk to, of course, she's now ready, Kara Castranova.
And Kara is at the White House.
And today there was a, hello, Kara.
It's good to see you.
Hey, Samaya, how are you?
So one of my favorite people in world politics was there today, Bibi Netanyahu.
He was there today.
And so were a lot of journalists.
So I didn't notice it covered on TV.
Well, it wasn't covered specifically because it was a private meeting.
So it was not open to the press.
There was a lot of really important conversations going on, obviously, between President Trump and Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
There was a lot of media there, really hoping that it would open up because sometimes, although it's announced to be closed press, they will open it to the media.
I would say that the briefing room was pretty full today, but it did not open up to the press.
But there was a readout, obviously, of what happened.
And President Trump made a statement afterwards.
As you know, this was a, it was being portrayed as a low-profile meeting.
This is the seventh meeting that the prime minister of Israel has had with President Trump since he's taken office the second time around.
Obviously, heavily centered around Iran.
Netanyahu is pressing for a tougher, broader U.S. line as Team Trump keeps nuclear negotiations with Iran alive.
As you know, last week, Jared Kusher and Steve Witkoff were there talking to Iran about their nuclear program.
So, after the sit-down today, President Trump signaled his preference as a deal while warning there would be tough alternatives if it collapses.
And he made it clear, he made it clear and he insisted that U.S. talks continue, even as Netanyahu is pushing, as you know, to widen the scope beyond the nuclear file to include ballistic missiles and also to include Iran's support for regional proxy groups.
So, President Trump is saying he's keeping an open mind, but he's really leaning towards a deal with Iran right now in terms of the nuclear program, Mr. Mayor.
Well, I think that Netanyahu, at least the way they went into the meeting, wanted to argue that you can't, it makes no sense to have an agreement with him or with the regime because they've yet to keep an agreement.
And they are under Sharia law sort of bound to lie to us if it's to their benefit.
I mean, it's sort of like the Communist Party.
They are, to them, morality dictates they lie and mislead us infidels.
And they do all the time.
We have 47 years of that.
So I think what Netanyahu was trying to do is to join with the Trump team that is arguing we're at the point where we're pursuing something that's just going to backfire on us.
Whereas I guess there are members of the Trump team that want to do negotiations at any cost.
Yeah, I think really just to nuclear.
They don't really want to talk about the ballistic missiles.
And Iran is saying that's a hard line.
They're not going to get rid of their ballistic missiles.
So that's something that Netanyahu really wants.
So it looks like there's more obvious conversations to happen in the future.
Nothing is really, in my opinion, going to be resolved after this one meeting today.
I'm assuming that the president will have to meet again with the prime minister, as well as the talks continuing with Iran, both sides, Iran and Israel, holding hard lines saying that, you know, obviously Iran doesn't want to get rid of its ballistic missiles and its proxy group funding.
And Israel is saying that that's something that really needs to happen.
So I guess it's up to President Trump.
But it looks like, at least right now, that is uncertain and that he is leaning towards making that nuclear deal when it comes to Iran.
He just wants to get that done, Mr. Mayor.
Yeah, somehow I doubt it.
There's something that tells me after all of the campaigning he did against the original nuclear deal and his knowledge that nothing they sign or agree to is worth it, worth worth the papers written on.
It's one thing to have an agreement where there's some hope they'll keep it, but it doesn't make sense to have an agreement where there's no hope that they're going to keep it.
Plus, there's a heck of a lot of extraneous proof that they violated his red line, which was not to execute people.
Today, there was a whole group of pictures put out of people that have been executed since then in Iran.
And whether they're executed or not, there are videos of them being shot in the street.
So I don't know.
I'm hoping that this is like last time, and he's doing a fake on the Iranians.
And one morning we're going to wake up like we did before, and the IRGC will have been eliminated.
Because that's what he has to do.
On this particular bombing, what they have to do is to reduce the strength of the IRGC so that the rebels can overtake them.
I don't think they can do it based on what they have right now and the IRGC has.
I think if you've reduced the IRGC by 20, 30%, put them on the run, I think they could absolutely do it.
They could be in control of the government within a matter of days if we do a good job of taking out their armaments and taking them out.
So I think that's going to happen sometime within the next week to 10 days, despite what is being said.
Just like last time, we were negotiating when Bibi bombed them and we bombed them.
So if I were Iran, I would have been going on.
Always something going on, as you know, especially in this administration.
Well, very good.
Anything else?
Today there was a march for peace.
I know that a lot of people, it doesn't go viral when people, but there were a bunch of Buddhist monks that came in.
We were there today, actually.
Yeah, I don't know if you saw anything about that on the news.
It was a positive thing today in DC with a bunch of monks who marched here from literally Texas, some of them barefoot.
One guy lost a leg from what I understand with their dog.
They came here marching for peace.
They were in front of the Lincoln Memorial.
It was really beautiful.
It was a beautiful day.
We got to talk to some people.
A lot of people really just fatigued with the fighting, as you know, the back and forth between the quote unquote Republicans and the conservatives, more just regular people, tired of sort of fighting with each other.
So I think that this really resonated with people, these monks that were marching for peace.
So that happened today.
Yes.
And tomorrow, President Trump has a couple other things.
So we'll keep you updated as the week progresses.
And he's leaving on Friday for the weekend.
So every day.
So I'm in the pool tomorrow.
So hopefully I'll get a question in with the president.
Maybe I will ask him something about Iran.
Oh, you look forward to it.
I do.
I look forward to always being in front of the president and getting to ask him questions.
He's always so responsive and detailed when it comes to questions with the media.
As you know, he's been very, very transparent.
So looking forward to tomorrow, and I will definitely keep you updated.
Well, good luck.
We hope you get one of your great questions in, like you've done before.
We'll be looking forward to it.
Thank you, Kara.
She's gotten some very, very good questions in that went, several of which went viral.
I was going to suggest that she asked the president how he evaluates the credibility of the people on the other side, since the experience with them over 47 years is that they have never told the truth.
And it's almost a religious commitment to not tell the truth, given their version of not just their version of the Quran, but the words of the Quran and the words that they take very seriously from Muhammad, which basically can do anything that you can do to convert us or destroy us.
Where it would not be immoral for them based on their interpretation of Muhammad's teaching, which is probably the original interpretation and the more literal interpretation given what's in the Quran.
So to me, I am rather certain because the president is such a realistic guy that we're going through the motions.
He knows they don't tell the truth.
He knows that whatever they sign is not, again, they will not follow it.
And I seriously doubt he wants to put us or the world in that position or leave it that way because there's a chance that there'll be a president that doesn't have the courage to deal with this when he leaves office, particularly if he's a Democrat.
I mean, we've had this guy around since Jimmy Carter.
And no one, even Ronald Reagan, was able to deal with him, even after he killed American Marines.
And then you look at what he's done under, well, I don't know about Bush, but he certainly was very active in killing Americans under Clinton, very active under Bush 2, where they used him really almost as an ally against Saddam Hussein.
Meanwhile, he was turning around with the Quds force and killing Americans.
He did a lot of it under Obama, a lot.
A lot of killing of Americans.
And then it was so bad that Trump took out his main guy who killed Americans, all the money.
And then they've continued to do it.
Their blood on their hands is extraordinary.
Only other government or homicidal dictator I can think of that's worse is Zijin Meek.
Maybe there's someone I don't know about.
We'll see.
Inflation's January Conundrum00:07:22
I was going to talk about the economy because there were two different indicators.
Once again, that it can give you a little bit of a confused picture about the economy.
One was the jobs report, and the other was the report on business growth.
So the jobs report, which came out today, was favorable.
And the report on the level of retail business was not terrible, but a little less than anticipated, which is always considered to the negative side.
However, it all gets balanced by the fact that the market, whatever happened to it today, is in record levels, which affects directly 52% of Americans and ultimately with a reverberating effect, affects all of us, affects our economy.
Beyond that, on Friday, the inflation numbers will come out.
And I want to warn you about the inflation numbers.
As the Wall Street Journal, the Wall Street Journal has a chart on the front page, which you should look at, that points out that the worst month for inflation, no matter what happens by the end of the year, is January.
Why?
Now, every once in a while, there's an exception, but every two out of three years, three out of four years of January.
Why?
Why would January be the worst?
Take a stab at it.
Ted, you want to take a stab at it?
I better not.
Okay.
Well, I didn't know it either until I read it.
I didn't know it either until I read it.
But when you hear it, it's going to make all the sense in the world.
Because people set prices at the beginning of the year.
So if you're going to raise your prices, you do it at the beginning of the year.
And then you probably don't raise it again for quite some time.
So see, so let's say I have a grocery store.
I probably somewhere toward the end of the year do an inventory.
And I take a look at what kind of profit I'm making on all my items.
And I might say, gee, I might reduce some, right?
Because we're making a sufficient or more than sufficient profit.
But there may be some that I'm not.
And it's bringing things down.
And I may raise the prices on that if you think you can get away with it.
That's what capitalism is all about, right?
You raise it to a price that brings you a reasonable profit, but puts it in a range in which people could afford it.
And that happens a lot in January.
Every once in a while, it's put off, and you don't get that inflation in January.
But you're not really going to tell whether we have inflation in the sense of affecting our economy until we get to about March or April and we see what's going on.
And if it does, as it did last year, level off to well below what it was under Biden, then we're in very, very good territory.
And that's what the Secretary of the Treasury and most economists believe will happen.
Guaranteed, if the January number comes in a little high, the Wall Street Journal and all the other people who are obsessed on tariffs will blame it on the tariffs.
Despite the fact that without tariffs, most January's inflation goes up.
And probably we can look to January's, given at least the data we have right now, that will be much worse than this January.
Even if it is going up, it'll be probably in the range in which, oh, in the Carter-Reagan years, they would laugh at us if we thought it was inflation.
I mean, Carter had it in double digits.
I mean, if this is disappointing, it's going to be 2.7% instead of 2.3%, which to me, having grown up in those years, is, I have no idea why we're getting so upset when all the other indicators in our economy are so terrific.
But in any event.
Let's see what happens.
The other thing that is so dawn important is that he continue the relentless profit to reduce regulations, probably more important than even his tax reduction, which we're not going to feel the effect of until three or four months into the year.
That's another thing.
Whatever we're looking at for inflation in January and February and March is going to be affected heavily by the much lower taxes a lot of people are going to pay in April.
And that will level off inflation.
Important that we follow this because this election year, that'll have a big effect on the 2026 election.
And it's really where our economy stands at the beginning, at most to the end of the summer, that affects the election.
Because an economic reversal up or down in September, October, November, is too late to factor into enough voters to make a difference.
Voters sort of voters sort of, and people are sort of two or three months back on inflation.
So if you go into August and the economy is soaring, unless there's a depression, unless there's a crash, some inflation increase or whatever in September, October, not going to help you.
I mean, we have very, very famous situations both on either side where presidents were turned out of office on the theory of economic decline, only to people figure out by December that we're in an economic recovery and it started under the prior president who we threw out of office.
It was true of Clinton and Bush.
The recovery started in August and nobody felt it.
And then Clinton looked like it was a Clinton, but all of the groundwork for that had been laid in the Bush administration.
We can say in Clinton's favor, he did nothing to interrupt it.
Whereas I'll give you another example.
We were going through an economic recovery when Biden came in.
Even though there was a pandemic, we're having a remarkable recovery from the pandemic immediately.
They reversed it all.
Reversed it all with his anti-inflation act, which was now, you know, admittedly a pro-inflation act and a pro-bankruptcy act for the United States.
He produced enormous debt in the United States of America.
So you come over now to X, and we're going to continue.
We've got a lot of things to discuss.
Horrible Mass Murder Censored00:02:10
The horrible mass murder in Canada, which is being kept from you because we have a censored media, tragically, in a country that prizes free discussion and free speech.
In fact, it's a constitutional right.
But we have a mass shooting and the facts of it are being kept from you, as they are often when this situation arises, so that you don't do anything about this.
So why don't you come to X, to the America's Mayor Live, because we can perform the function we perform best, which is to give you information that's being withheld from you as an American, because the media and the left-wing Democrats really want to deliver us over to some form of communism or some form of Islamic extremism, if you happen to be the mayor of New York,
who we will also discuss because he continues to let people die on the streets.
And his Republican, extremely left-wing city council has turned on him because they have difficulty with what appears to be murder.
So we'll cover all that, plus the Russian drone strike on Ukraine, and a few more things that have come in and things we can go over and analyze with regard to the Guthrie case, which is almost like an education in Investigations 101.
We're almost up to 102 now.
These are things that you would be taught at John Jay School for Criminal Justice that trains police officers and FBI agents, and to some extent, even law school.
So you come over to X. We'll get you informed like you should be so that you can be an American citizen who's not part of the blindfolded masses, but one of the people that's a decision maker.