Belgium’s 2024 law grants sex workers maternity leave, pensions, and contracts—first globally after decriminalization in 2022—while critics like ASALA argue it normalizes exploitation. Meanwhile, UK IVF cases for single women and lesbian couples surged from 1,400 to 4,800 (2012–2022), yet NHS funding dropped to 27%, exposing double standards as men face harsher backlash for similar choices. Expanding definitions of consent, abuse, and rape—now including subjective resistance or delayed trauma—risk criminalizing ambiguous interactions, with cases like Candace Owens vs. Stephen Crowder illustrating legal overreach. The shift suggests feminist narratives redefine power struggles, weaponizing courts against men while shielding women’s actions from scrutiny, undermining objective justice. [Automatically generated summary]
Good afternoon, good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to another episode of Pearl Daily here on the Audacity Network.
Today, we are going to talk about Belgium sex workers getting maternity leave and pensions under world first law.
So, as you guys know, the trend going into today's society is just an abundance of sex workers.
As women's hypergamy is in full form and we are going after a smaller and smaller percentage of men, the opportunity for women to monetize their sexuality because there is an increasing number of sexless men.
Let's read the article.
I had to work while I was nine months pregnant, says Sophie, a sex worker in Belgium.
I was having sex with clients one week before giving birth.
Who was buying a sex worker pregnant?
I mean, don't get me wrong, this is the audacity, right?
But I expect the audacity from women a little bit.
But which one of you bought, which one of you was in Belgium and thinking, I need to have a good time?
Let me pick the pregnant woman.
No, no, no, not the non-pregnant woman, the pregnant woman.
She juggles her job with being a mother of five, which is really hard.
When Sophie and her fifth child by Kay Sirn, she was told she needed bed rest for six weeks, but she said that wasn't an option and she went back to work immediately.
I couldn't afford to stop because I needed the money.
Her life would have been much easier had she had the right to maternity leave paid by her employer.
Under a new law in Belgium, the first of its kind in the world, this will now be the case.
Sex workers will be entitled to official employment contracts, health insurance, pensions, maternity leave, and six days, sick days.
Essentially, it will be treated like any other job.
It's an opportunity for us to exist as people, Sophie says.
There are tens of millions of sex workers worldwide.
Sex work was decriminalized in Belgium in 2022 and is legal in several countries, including Germany, Greece, and the Netherlands and Turkey.
But establishing employment rights and contracts is a global first.
This is radical, and it's the best step we have seen anywhere in the world so far, says Erin Kilbride, a researcher on the Human Rights Watch.
Can you imagine?
The Human Rights Watch is talking about all the human rights that people need.
First on their agenda is: let's give sex workers maternity leave.
I mean, should we be enabling this as a society?
I'm not an anti-sex worker.
Look, if the ladies, if we're not going to put a gun to the ladies' head and say, get married young, okay, we're not doing it.
They said, please, we're begging you, do it, do it, do it, get married young, the trad say, come on, ladies, go back to traditionalism.
And the ladies said, nah, we want to start OnlyFans.
Nah, we want to go work.
Nah, we don't want to do that.
That's boring.
So that's not going to work, right?
So the way I see it, the young men are going to have to have sex with somebody, right?
I mean, and if the women aren't going to do it, I don't like this reality.
It kind of makes me uncomfortable, but I'm just being realistic here.
What are the guys going to do?
I mean, there's corn and sex work.
So, but all I'm saying is human rights, you would think maybe they'd have bigger fish to fry than maternity leave for sex workers.
I don't know.
I don't know.
Okay.
We need every country to be moving in that direction.
Critics say the trade-off causes trafficking, exploitation, and abuse, which this law will not prevent.
It's dangerous because it normalizes a profession that is always violent at its core, says Julia Cremier, a volunteer with ASALA, an NGO that helps women sex workers on the streets in Belgium.
For many sex workers, the job is necessary, and the law could not come soon enough.
Mel was horrified when she was forced to give a client oral sex without a condom because she knew a sexually transmitted infection was going around this brothel, but she felt like she had no option.
My choice was either to spread the disease or make no money.
There was no option, none really.
I mean, who the BBC is so full of it.
Who writes this stuff?
You had no choice.
McDonald's wasn't hiring.
I don't know.
You could go do invest in like lawn care, an influencer, engineering, tech, a waitress.
Nothing?
She became an escort when she was 23.
She needed money and quickly started earning beyond expectations.
She thought she had struck gold, but the experience with the STI brought her sharply back to earth.
Mel will now be able to refuse any client or sexual act she feels uncomfortable with, meaning she could have handled that situation differently.
I could have pointed the finger at my madam and said, You're violating those terms, and this is how you should treat me.
I would have been legally protected.
Belgium's decision to change the law with the result of months of protests in 2022, prompted by the lack of support during the COVID pandemic.
One of those at the forefront was Victoria, president of the Belgian Union of Sex Workers, and previously an escort for 12 years.
For her, it's a personal fight.
Victoria regards prostitution as a social service, with sex being only about 10% of what she does.
It's giving people attention, listening to their stories, eating cake with them, dancing to waltz music, she explains.
Ultimately, it's about loneliness.
But the illegality of her in unsafe conditions, with no choice over her clients, and her agency being taking a big cut of her earnings.
In fact, Victoria says she was graped by a client who became obsessed with her.
She went to the police station where she says the female officer was so hard on her.
She told me sex workers can't be graped.
She made me feel like it was my fault because I did that job.
Sorry, I mean, can I talk?
Oh, don't clip this, guys.
Please don't clip this.
Don't do it.
Okay, I'm just going to keep going.
I'm going to reframe.
I'm going to ready.
No responsibility for that situation at all.
None.
I mean, there's nothing you can do to prevent that situation at all.
I mean, you know, I think to myself, you hear a lot of crazy cases over the years.
And there are ladies that are in very gruesome grape.
I'm going to say grape for this episode, situations where they're pulled off the side of the road and beaten, knife point, tarot did no wrong, right?
Like I heard about someone that was walking in broad daylight and snatched.
What was she supposed to do?
She wasn't doing anything irresponsible.
But when you hear the young, the ladies who are being completely irresponsible and something happens, I mean, there are steps we can take to prevent these sort of things, you know, maybe situations we don't want to be in.
But then you're the bad guy for mentioning it.
Okay, so because of that, Victoria fiercely believes this new law will improve their lives.
If there is no law and your job is illegal, there are protocols that will help you.
This law gives people the tools to make us safer.
Pimps who control sex will be allowed to operate legally under the new provided the new law, provided they follow strict rules.
Anyone who has been convicted of a serious crime will not be allowed to employ sex workers.
I think many businesses will have to shut down because a lot of employers have a criminal record, says Chris Reekmans.
He and his wife run a massage parlor on Love Street in the small town of Bevokut.
The massages they offer clients include Tantra and Double Pleasure.
It is fully booked when we visit, not what we were expecting for a Monday morning.
We are shown meticulously furnished rooms with massage beds, freshly towels, fresh towels, robes, hot tub, and swimming pools.
Kristen and his wife employ 15 sex workers and pride themselves on treating them with respect, protecting them, and paying them good salaries.
I hope the bad employers will be shut down and the good people who do this profession honestly will stay.
The more, the better.
Erin Kilbride from Human Rights Watch is of a similar mind and says by putting restrictions on employers, the new law will significantly cut away the power they have over sex workers.
It's not about being outside in the freezing weather and having sex with strangers.
Under Belgium's new law, each room where sexual services take place may be equipped with an alarm button that will connect a sex worker with their reference person.
But Julia believes that in no way, there is no way to make sex work safe.
And what other job would you need a panic button?
It's not the oldest profession in the world.
It's the oldest exploitation in the world.
How to regulate the sex industry remains a divisive global issue, but for Mel, bringing it out of the shadows can help women.
I am proud that Belgium is so far ahead.
I have a future now.
So we're going to keep seeing this, right?
We're going to keep seeing the increase in sex workers.
They're getting more rights.
And there is a trend that sex workers have a tendency to go through.
So when they are young, they make decisions.
And when I met a lot of OnlyFans models, sex workers, that sort of thing, what perplexed me was I really thought that many of them did it for money.
I really thought that many were naive and, you know, coerced into that sort of industry.
Maybe they had a bad home life.
But what I found was amazing was the amount that came from good two-parent homes, the amount that didn't do it because they needed the money.
But what you start to notice is they do it because they like it and they enjoy the attention.
And many just enjoy sexual variety.
They're not coerced.
They're not tricked.
And what happens is they get older, they start to age out, and they do the typical, oh, I didn't know what I was doing.
When at the time you can talk to them and they know exactly what they're doing.
But it's a very good story we're going to talk about is another trend that I have been talking about, which is the increase in older women having children and the increase in single women becoming mothers through IVF.
So more single women and female couples are having IVF.
The number of single women and female couples undergoing IVF or artificial insemination in the UK has risen over the past decade.
The number of single women having treatment, including IVF, has increased from 1,400 in 2012 to 4,800 in 2022, while the number of female couples treated has doubled to 3,300 over the same period.
Heterosexual couples still account for nearly 90% of all IVF treatments.
A fertility charity said many female couples and single women still faced enormous financial hurdles to prove their infertility before being able to access NHS-funded IVF.
Growing numbers, talk about, right, the sexes are going more apart.
Anybody that tells you differently every data point that we're looking at, that's what it's showing.
It's showing men and women are going apart.
And you're going to see more single parent homes, especially from women.
You're going to see women going through sperm bakes because, again, women refuse to be saddled down with average men.
Growing numbers of family groups are seeking fertility treatments.
Heterosexual couples had 47,000 IVF or donor inseminations in 2022, up from 45,300 in 2012.
But one in six of all private and NHS fertility treatments in the UK is now accessed by single women and female same-sex couples, according to the Human Fertilization Embryology.
I'm not even going to say that, the HFEA report.
So, one in six IVF treatments is now either lesbian couples or single women.
And remember, what's interesting is this, you do not see traditional conservative media being outraged over this.
But when Dave Rubin recently did IVF with his male partner, it was out.
Everybody in conservative media was super, super outraged.
But nobody is being outraged or covering this because, again, women's issues and women's issues are always take precedent over men's issues.
And whenever men take control of their sexuality, whenever you hear a man say that he wants to get a surrogate, let's say, or he wants to be a single father, that will be shamed 10 times harder than a woman choosing to be a single mother.
All of the conservative women that got divorced chose single motherhood.
You don't see an outcry over that.
But when a man does it, it's World War III, right?
Okay.
Laura Rose Thorgood and her female partner have spent 50 to 60,000 pounds on having four children over the last 13 years.
It's been a journey.
We knew we had to pay for it ourselves and we've had to sacrifice a lot of things, she says.
Laura Rose said they feel very lucky to have more than one child and know that many other LGBTQ couples who had to stop trying for children because of the cost.
She set up LGBT Mummies, an organization which gives advice to people on becoming parents and campaigned for equal access to fertility treatments.
The whole system needs to be reviewed.
Many heterosexual couples also describe the challenge of multiple rounds of IVF.
The NHF, expensive treatments, NHS funding for fertility treatments continues to fall.
It now pays for 27% of IVF cycles down from 40% in 2012.
Among 18 to 39-year-olds having their first treatment, heterosexual couples receive 52% of NHS accounting for 16% and single women accounting for 18%, a slight rise.
So you're also going to see this become an election campaigning issue.
We have to remember women are the biggest swing voters, right?
So most politicians know that men, when they vote, they tend to stay with their party.
So they're usually lifelong Democrats or lifelong Republicans.
It takes a lot for men to switch their parties.
Women, on the other hand, have a tendency to change party, which kind of makes sense.
We like to go with the fashion trends, where a guy can wear the same sweatshirt, drive the same car for 20 years.
Women, it's like the latest fashion trend.
You see us get holes in our shirts, you know.
And the guys are like, what are they wearing?
Right.
And so it would make sense.
It's no different with political aspirations.
So, every election season, you see the politicians saying, How can we get the female vote?
What do we have to bargain with?
What you're going to see now is free IVF treatments.
That's what they're going to push for.
Because, again, women are choosing, they're saying, We don't want to be saddled down with average men.
We want the best.
So, what do the women do?
They go to school so they don't have to do it.
They will go get IVF treatment so they don't have to do it.
They will go to I forgot where they get BBLs, but they will go spend thousands of dollars on a BBL just so they can have a chance with the top-tier men.
And I'm going to show you an example of this in a second.
Okay, we're going to move on to the next.
I think you got to scroll it.
So, they say female couples and single women are choosing it for several reasons, including the higher birth rate per cycle, reduced risk of twin pregnancy, and strong embryos for future treatments.
So, guys, as most of you know, I have been fighting on the front lines of this simp epidemic for years, but I need to tell you about a quiet weapon being ratcheted up against men that is rarely talked about.
It's not just the relentless anti-masculinity propaganda and OnlyFans bimbos causing the societal issues we discuss on the show.
Did you know the average city's tap water contains trace pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors?
This often includes estrogen from birth control.
The average adult consumes a credit card worth of plastic every week.
That's five grams of plastic a week on average.
So, it's no wonder that the average male's testosterone is half of what it was 50 years ago.
Estrogen levels decline 1% a year, and without course correction, we are headed towards extinction.
But no matter how based you are, you need to be naturally boosting your testosterone.
My friends, my friends at chalk, choq.com, are on a mission to save mankind from extinction by boosting your vitality.
Chalk's male vitality stack contains premium and potent herbs clinically studied to boost your testosterone level, sperm count, and overall vitality.
Just one of the many ingredients in the male vitality stack was studied in double blind human clinical trials to boost total testosterone levels 20% in 90 days.
When you boost your testosterone, you'll have more mental clarity.
You'll be more capable of making decisions and taking risks.
Having high testosterone will also affect your pheromone, so women will find you more attractive subconsciously.
Get the chalk male vitality stack right now on chalk.com.
That's choq.com.
Use my name pearl as your coupon code, and you'll get 25% off-site-wide on chalk.com.
That's choq.com.
My name Pearl is the discount code.
Okay, moving on.
So there is this idea pushed by conservatives that women are tricked into feminism and that it's just this one big trick and that women have no idea what they're doing.
They just, oh, we picked the OnlyFans on accident.
We picked the fun HR job with the, what do you call it at work?
The, oh my gosh, I can't remember, the table tennis, the table tennis at work by accident.
Oh, they really just want to be wives and mothers and saddle, be saddled down at 20 years old.
And it's all a trick.
And that's not really reality.
It's like what we would like to be reality.
And it sounds really good in sound bites, right?
You know, when you have a sound bite and you say women are just tricked into feminism and they really, their purpose is really to be wives and mothers.
Now, I'm not saying that's incorrect, but what I'm saying is nobody's tricked into anything.
And when you follow the incentives, it makes perfect sense.
So there's a woman named Sidney Thomas.
Now, Sidney Thomas was the ring girl at the Jake Paul fight.
So she went viral for essentially being just one of the most beautiful women I've seen on TV in a long time.
The last couple of years, they've been propping up a lot of mids.
Now, there's nothing wrong with being a mid.
A mid is like a four to a 6.57 in looks range.
You know, I myself, I would take that, I would say I would be in that category.
It's not an insult.
Most people are average.
But when I want to look on TV, I expect to feel insecure.
And really, Hollywood, the last couple of years, has been letting me down because they keep putting on these average-looking women when it's supposed to be eights, nines, and tens.
It's supposed to be a 22-year-old Margot Robbie.
So, anyways, this ring girl, when you get to more male-dominated spaces, that's when you see, or sorry, when there's more of a male audience, that is when you see the more beautiful women coming back.
So, when it was a UFC fight, or not UFC, but when it was a fight between Jake Paul and he puts on this big fighting event, the ring girls are eights, nines, and tens.
Like, let me, I'll show you the picture.
So, she goes viral.
Everyone just thinks this woman is stunning.
And now she's got a social media following.
She's an influencer.
She's getting invited to all these big events.
And she talks about in this clip how she dumped her boyfriend.
And when you look at it from her perspective, it makes perfect sense.
Let me play this.
I literally broke up with my boyfriend, had no problems with him at all.
Like, he was great.
This is before that you got right before summer.
I just broke up with him because I was like, I just need more time with myself.
I just need to discover who I am.
I want to be alone.
I want to just focus on myself.
And like, as hard as it was to lose him and like lose each other, I just like, I feel like it's all God's plan.
It works out in the end.
Yeah, look where we are now.
Okay, so now, do you think if she was in a relationship, she could have been the ring girl at the Jake Paul and Mike Tyson fight?
Do you think her boyfriend would have said, you know what?
Sure.
Go ahead, honey.
I am super happy for you to be half-naked in front of millions of people.
So this woman is an eight to 10, that range.
And she knows that she's now, because she's like 20, 21.
So now she's getting opportunities, right?
She's at some, I think it was some southern small college.
And because we're in the global sexual marketplace and the most beautiful women are given opportunities to interact with the highest level men in society, it's kind of a no-brainer from this woman's perspective.
She can go be worshipped, be rich, make millions of dollars off of her looks, be famous, have the opportunity to marry and date celebrities, athletes, really, in her position, whoever she wants, it's not feminism tricking her to pick the opportunity over the boyfriend.
It's not, It's really just that she's getting better opportunities elsewhere.
And most women will not sacrifice it for an average guy.
And I just, the reason I like to bring up these real life examples is because women just have the biggest get out of ability, I didn't know.
And more often, it's something like this.
They do know.
It's just one option was way more exciting and fun.
And that was what she picked.
So, okay.
Now, the next thing I want to talk about is Tiffany Fang.
So, Tiffany Fong, sorry, Fong, is a creator on X.
And she has been really open about the fact that she is making a ton of money off the X platform.
So, she made $16,000 between the October 25th to November 8th pay period, $11,000 between October 11th and October 25th.
And what you see on X is X is very, very divided.
Many people are very, I would say, upset or confused as to how she is making so much money.
And I want to explain why people are upset.
So, Alex Finn wrote, Upset that Tiffany Fong got a way higher X payout than you.
I talked to an ex-employee this morning and they gave me the scoop.
Your X payout amount comes to one singular metric: how many verified followers engage with you?
That's it.
In a few weeks, you'll get metrics about how many verified accounts follow you.
That will be a massive for shutting the crybabies up.
So, when it comes down to this, want higher X payouts, get more verified followers to engage with you.
How do you do that?
Engage with them, reply like a madman.
The more you reply to verified accounts, the more those verified accounts will reply to you.
The last thing you should be doing is complaining.
Complaining increases your payout by zero dollars and it makes you look like a crybaby.
If you're complaining about your payout, you simply do not have enough verified followers.
Complain or take action up to you.
Now, one of the top comments from this is a guy named Mark, and he says, You need to post better content.
And it's Tiffany Fong saying, Which way is you know, it's a very low effort post.
And if you go through her account in general, it's all very, very low effort, right?
So, the men are just kind of confused now.
You have to understand, as women, many men have been in environments where a woman at work is being promoted seemingly for no reason.
She doesn't seem to be more competent, she doesn't seem to be better at the job.
In fact, maybe they get help from the men around them.
And what happens in those situations is oftentimes, because we all know that at work is the number one place where affairs happen, later it's coming out that that woman who's getting promotion for no reason is sleeping with the boss.
Now, this isn't always, I'm not saying she is, but when it comes out that Elon Musk is replying to this random woman, producing what looks like to most people low-quality content, and you get the richest man In America, replying to her that owns the app, men sort of put two and two together,
and the impression is going to be that he's giving her special treatment.
Is he?
Is he not?
I'm not saying one way or the other.
I don't know.
But what I'm trying to explain is the way that many men are going to see this.
You know, they've been in a situation where this has happened at work.
One woman got promoted.
Nobody can figure out why.
Oh, she's sleeping with the boss.
Because we all know it's very common for women to use their sexuality to get ahead.
Okay, so now it comes out that oh, the next one.
She may be, it's alleged that they found a sugar baby site.
So apparently the internet finds out that this woman is on a sugar baby site.
Oh, wait, it's not this one.
It's the other one.
Now, I don't know.
She, uh, where is it?
Um, hold on.
Now, oh, it's this one.
Oh, I forgot.
That's why it's the hold on.
I'm going to find it.
But basically, you know, you know how the internet is.
They find everything.
So allegedly, Tiffany Fong is on a sugar baby site.
Now we have to think of the incentives in this situation.
So this is her website here.
And it says she's looking for men 18 to 52.
She's Asian, no kids.
Her location is in Nevada.
And this is her profile.
Now, one of three things has happened: A, it's real.
B, it's not real.
Now, being on the internet for a long time, I have never had someone, I've never been on that website.
I've never had anyone fake this.
So it seems a little bit implausible to me or unlikely that someone will randomly fake this website.
But I have to think of her incentive.
So if she did, if she was a former sugar baby or prostitute, would it make sense for her to say it was fake?
Now, we could also say that there is an incentive for people to fake the documents to go viral on Twitter.
We're never going to know.
But after this, Elon Musk unfollows her.
Yeah, so that was why I couldn't find it earlier.
So now he is not following Tiffany Fong.
So I think we'll see in the future if her ex payments keep, you know, being crazy.
But if you look at her account, it's really crazy engagement for very low-level tweets.
Now, I don't, I'm not, I don't care either way.
It is what it is.
It could be because she's a girl.
It could be because she has special interests or she has special connections that are helping her out.
I don't know.
But a lot of men are coming back and they're saying, oh, you guys are just jealous of her.
The challenge is many men have just seen this film before.
They've been at work, they've been in some environment where a woman is making obscene amounts of money and they couldn't figure out why.
And it comes out later that she's hooking up with the boss.
That's why men are saying this.
It's not because they're jealous.
It's because, again, they've seen things like this before.
Okay, now the next topic that we're going to talk about is rewriting history.
So let's talk about feminism.
Now, we have to understand that when women get into power, we have, we cannot use physical violence ourselves.
We are not as strong as men.
And so the only way that we can get things done are verbal violence, different confusion techniques, I guess you could say, and getting a man to do it for us.
So what is it when women weaponize the legal system against a man?
That is women getting another man to do it for them, right?
They're going to the police and they're getting a man to enforce the law that they pass.
So I want to talk about common history that feminism ignores and other strategies that feminism uses in order to gain power.
Now, one thing that when I go on these debates and I go on these shows, they always tell me that women have had no power in history, that women have just been this oppressed class.
And why did they say that?
The reason that feminists want us to believe that women are oppressed is because there is power in victimhood.
Men's sex drive is so strong and they have a protector instinct that the more you can play victim, the more you can get resources from men.
So one way that they lie is they say women have never had power, but yet the Egyptian queen Cleopatra had power in 1478 BC.
Bloody Mary was the 16th century and Queen Elizabeth I was in 1533.
So these are hundreds, even thousands of years ago.
Women have had power throughout all of history.
There are examples of female rulers, but yet they keep repeating the lie that women have had no rights.
They also say that women have never been able to get an education.
Every time I say my opinion that I can't say on YouTube that we should not have a certain whatever, I can't say it, but you guys, you know, catch my drift.
They always respond to me with, well, Pearl, you wouldn't be able to work.
You wouldn't be able to get an education.
And I just think that it's the dumbest thing I've ever heard because Julia Morell awarded a doctorate of law in 1608.
So we're in 2024.
400 years ago, this woman was able to get a doctorate of law.
What the heck am I complaining about?
Oberlin College was admitting women as early as 1833.
Catherine Brewer obtained a degree in 1840 from Oberlin College.
The first female landowner in the U.S. was Margaret Brent in 1639.
And it's really frustrating because they keep trying to feed to me victim, And I don't see it.
I don't go outside and see women being refused work.
I mean, even on YouTube, they say that we're a protected class.
Excuse me.
Now, the other thing that women do is we have a tendency to change language.
Not sorry, not women.
Feminists.
Another thing that feminists do is we have a tendency to change language.
Now, I got to wondering a couple of years ago.
Where did this fake grape, I'm going to say grape epidemic come from?
So it turns out that 61% of all grape accusations are reported false.
According to Sheriff Roland Birmingham County, Idaho Police Department, 56% of false rape allegations are used as an alibi to cover up consensual sex.
A married woman, a married 30-year-old female, reported that she had been graped in her apartment complex.
During a polygraph, she reported that she had been graped because her partner did not stop ejaculation as he agreed, and she was afraid she was pregnant and her husband was overseas.
So essentially she reported this.
They put her under a polygraph and she cracked.
Now, we can agree that the ejaculation situation, I mean, we don't, we don't, that's not great, right?
But that is not the same thing as being pulled off of the side of the road, held at knife point, and being overtaken.
And you think, how did we get here?
And what you'll notice is when feminists get into the legal system, what they have a tendency to do is change the definition of everything to be more broad.
Because the broader you make it, the more men can be thrown in prison, fired, et cetera, et cetera.
Because oftentimes, these cases, it's up to the discretion of a judge.
So the old definition of rape, grape, was the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.
So essentially, forced sex.
And the new definition is penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus within with any body part of object or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person without the consent of a victim.
Now, what is the key word in there?
And I want you guys to be able to hear this because when you hear people telling stories, there's certain key words that you have to be able to pick up to understand what they're really saying.
Sorry, guys.
So the key word is consent.
What is consent?
And this is where things get a little bit gray.
Now, oftentimes what you hear is, I said no, or no means no.
But when you get the experience of men or men telling you stories or situations they've been in, oftentimes women will say that and then change their mind.
So what happens if they initially said no and then changed their mind later?
They can still say that they said no, okay?
The other thing is they add in new words to include more behavior that they just don't like.
Now, again, I'm not saying that these behaviors are moral or immoral, but let's not pretend it's the same thing as being held at knife point, pulled off the side of the road, and having onto the side of the road and being forced to have sex against your will.
Can agree, those are completely different things, right?
So, coercion is defined as the use or threatened use of lawful force upon any person which induces him or her to do an act against his or her will.
So, the key word in this is threatened use.
The use or threatened use of lawful force upon any person which induces him to do an act against his or her will.
Now, when I hear this, I think, you know, knife point, gun point, or I'm going to go get a gun.
I'm going to shoot your face.
That's what I think of.
But when I hear it in practice, they're able to put in, oh, I thought he might get a gun, or I thought he, I felt like he was going to hurt me.
I don't think that's the same thing.
Sexual assault is sexual contact or behavior that occurs without explicit, again, the word again, consent from the victim.
Sexual battery, forced or attempted oral, anal, vaginal penetration by using a sexual organ or object simulating a sexual organ or the anal or vaginal penetration of another body part or foreign object.
Both males and females can be victims of sexual battery.
Then you get abuse.
Now, abuse used to be physical abuse.
He hit me, I didn't hit back.
He hit me for no reason.
Then they broadened the definition.
So they included things like spiritual abuse.
So if you force your woman, if you, you know, the trads will always say pray every day, then she won't leave you.
Well, if you force her to pray, that could be spiritual abuse.
And it holds up in court.
Family court, anyways.
On top of that, they have emotional abuse.
So the shift from defining domestic abuse solely as physical violence to include emotional, psychological, and economic abuse began in the 1990s, particularly with the passage of the Violence Against Women Act in 1994.
While the Violence Against Women Act initially focused on physical violence, subsequent reauthorizations and interpretations broadened its scope.
So remember, they changed the definition and they broaden it.
That's how they do it.
The term domestic violence was officially expanded in federal and policy contexts during the early 2000s when legal and advocacy efforts started incorporating non-physical forms of abuse.
For instance, the 2000 reauthorization of the Violence Against Woman Act, this included funding and legal recognition for programs addressing emotional abuse and broader dynamics of power control within abusive relationships.
So who defines what emotional abuse is?
Who defines it?
Do the men get to define it or do the women get to define it?
By the early 2010s, agencies like the Office on the Violence Against Women and state laws began formally recognizing emotional, psychological, and financial abuse as key components of domestic violence.
Broad public recognition, legal, and cultural definitions were increasingly informed by frameworks like the Duluth model, which emphasized patterns of coercion and control.
So this is what they do.
They first change the definition of the words.
Then they add in more words to criminalize behaviors they don't like.
So if a guy talks to you in the wrong way, that's emotional abuse.
If he makes you go to church, that's spiritual abuse.
He says, no, don't spend $10,000 on the credit card this month.
That's financial abuse, especially if she's a stay-at-home wife.
And they essentially, any behavior they don't like, they just criminalize.
Now, I am not saying that some of this behavior that we're talking about isn't immoral, but I don't think every immoral situation needs to be criminalized, you know, like cheating.
You know, if somebody cheats, it's wrong, but do they need to go to jail?
I don't think so.
Now, the emotional abuse definition is the intentional infliction of distress, anguish, or intimidation through non-physical acts.
So if I'm distressed, okay, you know, let's say the guy cheats on me and I'm distressed.
Is that emotional abuse?
You could say it's wrong.
Or maybe he yelled at me in a way I don't like and I'm very, very distressed.
Is that emotional abuse?
And that's why you see the conservative commentators.
You saw Candace Owens accuse Stephen Crowder of emotional abuse.
That's why I say that when push comes to shove, they will act just as feminist as the liberals because you have Candace Owens, a conservative commentator, accusing Stephen Crowder of emotional abuse because he spoke to his wife in his house.
Her reputation was at a wall because she was a conservative commentator and divorced.
And then what does she do?
She releases a long video accusing everyone of essay and abuse.
Like that, that's the tactic they go to.
And really, feminists, they openly admit to this.
Catherine McKinnon, a feminist, says, I call it grape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated.
Now, again, it goes back to it goes based on the woman's feelings.
So if she feels like she was spiritually abused, she feels like she was emotionally abused.
And you see the same thing in cases like Zach Bryan and Breonna Chicken Fry.
After the relationship, she felt like she was emotionally abused.
So clearly she was, right?
All heter, she also said all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women as a group are not strong enough to give meaningful consent.
As men, and another male feminist says, as men, we have no right to tell women what grape is.
We have no right to weigh in on the logistics of what constitutes rapes.
Rape, our role is to shut up and stop graping people.
I mean, this is insane.
And I want to show you how feminists convince.
Now, I don't know.
So feminists either convince other women that they were assaulted and graped when they weren't, or they don't know if the other women are convinced or they're doing it maliciously.
Let's say for the sake of this argument, they're convinced, right?
I'm going to show you what goes on during this.
Hey, everybody.
A little while ago, I got a letter from one of you wonderful viewers whom I cherish.
I wasn't able to stop thinking about it.
that to me says, well, let's talk about it.
I'm not going to post any direct excerpts from that letter sent to me because I want to protect and respect that person's anonymity and privacy and also respect and protect the trust given to me by virtue of them sharing it with me.
In a nutshell, what happened to this person, and I have a feeling has happened to a lot of other persons, was a situation involving someone this person knew mixed in alcohol and drugs, sex consensual, up until a point to which it is not anymore.
And this person put up resistance, not in the form of directly saying no, but trying to communicate in other kinds of body language.
And it continued.
The next morning, this person woke up.
So she's saying that the person did not say no, but tried to communicate with other types of body language.
Now, again, is this the same thing as being taken by knife point?
A very awkward encounter.
With a hazy idea of what had happened, but a very clear feeling and gut instinct that something had gone wrong, that something had been violated.
This person has carried this around for years.
A lot of times, I think there is this question going on and on and on in the brain of, well, was it, was it really rape?
Can I call it sexual assault?
Does that make my friend a rapist?
We compartmentalize it as small as we can and we put it away, not only because of the implications of what that means for us, but also the implications of what that means for the other person.
When it comes to that question of was it rape, I can tell you what the legal definitions of rape and sexual assault are.
I can also tell you that those legal definitions will change in the United States depending on what state you're in.
But to hopefully add a little more nuance to those definitions and stats and facts, I do want to offer things that don't disqualify double negative alert people or situations from being rape or sexual assault.
When it comes to the question of was it rape? The answer may be yes, even if you know the person.
Even if you were both drunk and or otherwise intoxicated.
Even if so it says wait the wrong one.
You people with diminished.
All right.
So she's saying you might not be able to legally consent due to alcohol and drugs.
So you're both drunk.
One of them, one gender, can call great.
The other can't.
We're both drunk and or otherwise intoxicated.
Even if you never said no.
Even if it started off.
Okay, so now even if you never said no, they can still there that still doesn't take it off the table.
Sensual.
Even if you felt personally guilty afterwards, even if you never contacted the police, even if you've never been able to bring yourself to call it rape or sexual assault because it just feels too ugly or too traumatic or too hurtful.
Even if something happened and you aren't entirely sure what it was, but you have that gut feeling that it was not right, that a violation occurred.
Trust that instinct.
It doesn't matter if it happened 20 minutes ago or 20 years ago.
Okay, so if you have this feeling, if you feel like it happened, it's real.
If you feel like you were graped, you totally were.
And so what happens is these type of videos are pushed out at institutions, at work, and all, even sometimes at Police departments, they've brought in the definition.
It's tougher in criminal court, but they push these videos.
And oftentimes, the judge trial and jury is in their special court.
So, what happens is there's family court, there are courts that are just at school.
I believe there's military courts, and those don't have the preponderance of evidence that they have in criminal court.
So, criminal court, it needs to be above 90%.
Balance of probabilities is above 50%.
So, it needs to be 51% likely that it happened is that it didn't happen.
And then, what you can do is they can revoke the opportunity from the men.
They can kick them out of their job, put them on military league, like whatever it is.
It depends on the court, right?
But that's how they do it: they brought in the definition, and now she's including more things.
She's saying, Well, even if you didn't say no, it could still be grape when 20 years ago that word was simply forced sex.
Now it's sex without consent.
That if you drank too much, now you didn't give consent.
If you did, you might have even said no and then changed your mind, or said yes, and then changed your mind.
You didn't even have to say no.
And maybe if you feel violated after, it was grape.
Is no statute of limitations for personal healing that can take place by first reaching out to those resources available, whether it's someone with your school's counseling center or reaching out to a local rape crisis center or calling a rape crisis hotline, having someone you can talk to to finally answer that question that goes on and on and on and on in your brain: was it rape?
Was it rape?
Am I just making all of this up?
From there, speaking of legalities, who can help you decide if and whether that is a path that you want to pursue.
And that, my friends, in terms of reporting things to the police and pursuing that, that is up to you.
I simply want to encourage you to take advantage of the resources that are available in the time that you need to do it.
What I'm most concerned about right now, where I'm sitting, is you and the people that I hear from who carry these questions around in their brain for years.
And even carrying it around an hour or a day is too long.
If the main thing that's holding you back is fear that someone won't believe you, here's one person: I believe you.
I also want to know.
So, she knows no facts.
No facts.
Any story.
This is ridiculous.
But the reason I brought this up was I wanted to show you guys the types of videos that they push at a lot of these institutions in order to basically, I don't want to say, maybe convince women that they were graped or encourage more women to report sexual misconduct under the guise of these new definitions.
This one's kind of long.
I'm going to watch this one tomorrow, actually.
Okay, so tune in tomorrow, and we will be showing one of the colleges, their video that they show students that pushes this stuff.
Also, go to theaudacitynetwork.com and sign up for my monthly membership if you want first access to our documentary.
And I'm going to read the live chat for the show because you also get that by signing up to theaudacitynetwork.com.
Bob Miller says, sick, free, Kwanzaa Prego.
OnlyFans, girls, are sex workers.
Kittias Kid says, I think a single father in general would do a much better job raising a child than a single woman.