CONTACT US: Email: paranaughtica@gmail.com Twitter: @paranaughtica Facebook: The Paranaughtica PodcastCricket: www.theindividuale.com Twitter: @Individualethe Hello!Today, we're going over some of the most heinous crimes that the United Nations, and UNICEF, the United Nations International Childrens Emergency Fund, have been found guilty beyond all reasonable doubt of having committed. The atrocities are rampant and go back do their very beginnings. These “save the children” type organizations are nothing more than child trafficking networks. Plain and Simple. This is a very disturbing episode about child abuse at the hands of politicians and leading global authorities. What else will we get into? Box of rocks Kamala HarrisOlympic CeremoniesJudges and politicians wanting to lower the age of consentHow the WHO and the UN want children to have access to PORN...not even kiddingAnd so much more along the lines of systematic child sexual abuse by the hands of these shady organizationsAnd other stuffLinks in Episode: Link 1 Link 2 Link 3Link 4Link 5Link 6Link 7Link 8Link 9Link 10 Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Cricket. And we have quite an episode for you all today, and it's pretty gnarly as usual.
But if you're familiar with the show, then you know that we cover the things that are difficult for most people to handle, that, you know, most normies, that is, maybe not most, but a large amount of people.
There's only one way to get that information out, and it is to use the public forum, which...
Is this podcast, so let's just talk about these things.
Any difficult conversations, they tend to be the most necessary ones.
Yeah. So let's have one.
All right.
But Cricket, Cricket my pal, my pal Cricket, before we get into the main topic of the show, is there any news out there in the calm climate where everyone is just living amongst themselves peacefully and in agreement with one another despite their obvious differences in appearance as well as opinion?
Is there?
Is there?
Anything going on?
Well, in terms of agreements, there's a lot of agreements.
Everybody agrees they're being lied to.
Most people disagree primarily on where they're being lied to.
So, with that, let's get on to the news updates.
So, first, the Trump assassination news update.
Well, it's become even more confusing.
The question now, basically, is how many shooters?
Who knows how many shooters?
Two, three.
X number?
Was it even a single team or warring factions?
Because honestly, you look at that whole 26 minute long Keystone Cops nonsense operation and it doesn't even look like one team.
It looks like two teams working against each other where they don't want to directly engage, but they keep thwarting each other.
I mean...
Yeah, for sure.
And then you ask yourself, was this some kind of...
Test of AI, because I see all these images and videos from all these different angles, and you always ask yourself, how many of these are real and fake?
Can we even know anymore?
Dude, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Like, have you seen the new one going around that shows the shooter walking up on the roof?
Yeah, I see that one.
It's pretty darn blatant.
And the snipers are just like...
And that looks like two teams working around each other almost.
More than one cohesive team trying to get the shot off even.
Which team was the shooter on?
That's the really confusing thing.
Was the shooter actually trying to take a shot?
And were they on the team trying to make a real shooting go off?
Were they on...
The team that thwarted the other team and was staging a fake one.
Who even freaking knows?
And then everyone seems to be focused primarily on the ear and whether or not the ear was actually shot.
I suspect that's a red herring and they just want us to focus on that.
Because you look at all the evidence of just complete...
Ridiculousness that was that whole scene.
It serves essentially as a primer for how ridiculous staged BS events occur.
You got the signaler.
You got the distractor.
You got all the people in the crowd.
You got two different teams, potentially.
You got X number of shooters.
You got tons of censorship.
And I'm actually suspicious of the censorship because I almost feel like the news at this point...
Realizes how discredited they are.
So they're trying to censor things that they want us to focus on.
And that makes me wonder about the whole Trump assassination thing because they're censoring it so hard.
But at the same time, if you think about it, why has there not even been any kind of documentation about the ear?
They could quell this question with one medical document.
And in this world of AI production, you could fabricate that in two seconds if you needed to, you know.
Shush people about it.
So the fact that they're not putting it out makes me think it's like a Trump's tax return sort of situation where they're wanting you to focus on that and look away from all this weird nonsense going on in this operation and only focus on whether or not the era is real and fight about that.
I don't think he was shot in the air.
I mean, he went golfing the next day.
He was giving speeches within the days following.
Alleged bullet hole in his ear.
It nicked the top, right?
At least it nicked the top.
Because where did the blood come from?
Where's the blood coming from?
Oh, quote-unquote blood.
So he puts the patch on.
Everyone wears the patch.
There's some symbolism, whatever that's supposed to be.
And then we see him with the ear thing off, and there's no wound.
Within three or four days after you allegedly got shot, there's no wound.
I lean towards suspicious about the no medical report part, but I left it open because, well, obviously, any cosmetic surgery that a rich billionaire gets is not going to be the same thing.
It's true.
So I do understand that aspect.
If there's anybody who could get it rebuilt fast, it'd be him.
But there's no visual sign.
But the lack of documentation, the shystiness.
But my problem with it is that everybody is focusing too much on that and not enough on the whole Operation Counter Operation weirdness.
It just seems like it's some kind of conspiracy catnip, is what I call it.
They dangle it, and they get everybody chasing after it and rolling in it, and then they drop some proof that might be real, might be fake, that, oh, you're all wrong.
And then they just use that to completely try to discredit it and say, oh, see, so none of the other...
Weird conspiracy theorists nonsense about how this was some strange operation by different groups or possibly the Secret Service and others.
No, that's all silliness because you can see the air is real.
And that's what concerns me about this is because it's being dangled and pushed out, everybody's focusing way too much on that.
And they need to be focusing on the whole event.
That way, if one thing gets, quote, debunked or whatever, you can still point at two other things and say, no, this is still bullshit.
You don't want to focus too much on any one thing.
No, you can't.
Because if you do, then it's way too easy for them to put out even fake info to debunk that, and they're done.
You've got to keep the full spectrum of suspicion going.
So you've got the ear.
You got the fact that the Secret Service has no audio from that day, which is ridiculous, which the Secret Service representative guy in Congress testified to that and said.
I'm sorry, Moe.
Please forgive me.
That's suspicious.
The Google searches, this is really interesting, dude.
If you look up in Google, type in assassination of, you would think that it's a relevant event.
Trump would be there.
But it's everyone...
But Trump.
Trump is not listed in any of that stuff.
Assassination of Truman.
You got all these different names, right?
Never Trump.
So that's suspicious.
Oh, yeah.
And initially, it almost led credence to me that maybe it really did happen because, boy, they're sure burying it hard, aren't they?
And at first, that was what I thought.
But then I started thinking, or maybe it's to the point where they recognize that they're so discredited in the public eye that they actually need to attempt to censor the thinking.
Mm-hmm.
culture anymore.
So instead of pulling it from the front, they got to push it from the back.
And I'm really kind of starting to think that, and I would recommend to people be very suspicious going forward of having your preconceptions canonized due to this factor, because
I feel like it's going to be a real problem going forward in interpreting news is you're not going to know when they're trying to cover something up just because they know their attempts to do so.
actually lend it credence.
Yeah, there's a lot of scrutiny going on with that, with the Google thing and how Trump is omitted from all the auto-suggestions of AI.
Yeah, that is crazy.
They, like, are intentionally removing it from the AI auto spell.
And that's what makes me think this is like an Emanuel Goldstein sort of deal where they're building a mythos.
Like, see how much they want to suppress this man?
You need to give all your trust to him.
So you can hitch your wagon to whoever you want, but always distrust.
Insane. It's crazy.
That's always the way it works.
Yeah, and the window sniper in the window below the alleged shooter on the roof.
Apparently there are muzzle flashes coming from that bottom window.
Other people are saying it's a reflection of sunlight or something.
What do you think about that?
Some swamp gas reflected off of Venus.
It's swamp gas.
Reflected off of Venus.
It's fucking swamp gas.
What are you talking about?
That's swamp gas, you idiot.
Fuck. It was originally explained away as lens flare.
It's a lot harder to believe it when you see it in motion.
Although, I look at every video clip with scrutiny now due to the whole it could just be made completely from whole cloth at this point.
What a crappy time to interpret news, right?
Yeah, dude.
I feel sorry for most journalists.
You know, you go through a Marxist college, you get propagandized to believe in all this bullshit, and then you get a job with, like, CNN or ABC or all these fucking, you know, corporations that just suck just for a paycheck.
And then you sell yourself out.
You don't even become a journalist.
You're just a talking fucking head.
Very blatant.
Like, there is no room for...
There is no room for the Hunter S. Thompsons or the Cy Hershes.
Those people have to become independent journalists to have any level of success because you try to go mainstream, they hand you a piece of paper and say, read this.
And if you don't play ball, what do they do?
They bring you the old political thing.
They bring you into an office and show you the video of the JFK assassination and say, What are you going to do?
And say, well, on the low end, this is what your career is going to look like.
And that's the nicest interpretation you can make of that message.
Kamala Harris, dude.
Oh my god.
Can you just imagine?
I sense that she has some sorcery to her voice that no longer works on people.
Did you see this video of her, dude?
She's talking about...
She's asked the question by a reporter.
On live television about the rising cost of stuff.
And she's just like, you know, it is an extreme problem we have.
We all see the rising cost of things.
This is more expensive.
Gas is more expensive.
She just offers no intellectual input on the actual problem or any solution.
She just talks nonsense, dude.
It's ridiculous.
Are you going to do to fix this problem with inflation?
Thank you.
Well, let's start with this.
Prices have gone up.
And families and individuals are dealing with the realities of that bread costs more, that gas costs more.
And we have to understand what that means.
That's about the cost of living going up.
That's about having to stress and stretch limited resources.
That's about a source of stress for families that is not only economic, but is on a daily level something that is a heavy weight to carry.
So it is something that we take very seriously.
Very seriously.
Very seriously.
And we know from the history of this issue in the United States that when you see these prices go up, it has a direct impact on the quality of life for all people in our country.
So it's a big issue, and we take it seriously.
Very seriously.
That's so sad.
I mean, I could talk about that without even looking anything up.
Number one thing that seems to be going up the most is food.
Why do I know that?
Because I shop at a grocery store.
I mean, the level of out of touch there is just sad.
Let's move on to the symbolism behind the Olympic ceremony.
I'll try to go over it really fast.
Olympic ceremony.
All right, what's up?
Okay, so firstly, I tried to go over the whole thing because I was told everybody's focusing on the first 10 minutes instead of the three-hour ceremony.
Right. Boy, that's a hard clip to find.
Very difficult to look that up.
Can't find it anywhere.
Really, they wiped it out, huh?
Because they were talking about it.
Yeah, I can find some pictures and stuff of it, lighting displays and whatnot, but I can't find anything about the clip anymore.
I thankfully watched the first 10-minute intro part that everyone was bugging out about before it got pulled off the internet.
But otherwise, all that stuff's gone at this point.
Well, that dude's testicle is hanging out, man.
That dude fully had his balls hanging out.
Yep. Next to that little girl, too.
I think they claimed it was like a run in the stocking, but I don't know.
I honestly was too focused on the overt symbolism going on.
Oh, it was full of symbolism.
A little too on the nose.
Everybody's focused on the Last Supper parody and the Pale Horse quote, but I sense that that's not really the message being sent because I watched a little bit more about the overall full ceremony that happened.
What I saw more so was first there's this little animation that I've only seen mention of.
I don't seem to find clips of this anywhere anymore.
There was a 3D animation at the start, I guess, with a hot air balloon going by the Statue of Liberty and the Statue of Liberty had a gunshot wound in her face and a bunch of wounds all over.
It looked all messed up.
And that part is...
All I can find is mention of it.
I can't even tell if it's real or not because it's so hard to freaking find any information on this thing.
And so there's some...
Creepy on-the-nose symbolism.
I mean, I'm pretty sure Planet of the Apes established what a destroyed Statue of Liberty means.
Whoa, hold on.
I'm looking at a picture.
Someone took some screenshots, some still shots of the Statue of Liberty with a bullet hole in her face?
Or his face?
Or whatever the fuck?
Who is the Statue of Liberty supposed to represent?
Oh, I do believe...
It ultimately represents the goddess Ishtar, actually.
It's supposed to represent liberty enlightening the world.
Well, that's for the normies.
I've looked into the origin itself.
It's supposed to represent Ishtar, the Sumerian goddess of love.
Having the goddess of love destroyed, that's actually a creepy message in and of itself.
Not to mention the fact that...
As being the Sumerian goddess of love, it's a fairly on-the-nose description of we're going to destroy the old ways.
And then we move on to the Last Supper thing, which I think is essentially we're going to give you this new neo-paganist religion, quasi-religion of sorts.
And everyone bugs out and spurts about whether or not it's the Last Supper or the Feast of Dionysus, which that painting was itself an interpretation of the Last Supper that depicted the Feast of Dionysus.
So it's kind of an either-or, really.
It means the same thing.
And I guess the halos aren't really a thing so much in Greek mythology, but more so a Christian representation.
And, of course, there's the...
And of course, there's the social media posts announcing the New Gay Testament and all that.
So it's mostly backtracking, I honestly think.
And yeah, the sun rays are a pretty standard thing in old medieval iconography and stuff when you see old religious pictures and stuff of Christians and Jesus and his disciples and everything with the glows around their heads.
And so, yeah, The Last Supper was to me some sort of, we're going to give you a new religion of sorts, that you're going to be okay with this.
Because we're not going to necessarily make a new one, we're going to take yours and turn it into this.
Yeah. Yep.
Yep. And so that was the message there, I think, at the very least.
And then everybody talks about the pale horse and everything and says, oh, it represents death.
And then they counter with, oh, no, it's this metal horse that represents Sequina, the Lady of the Sane, etc., etc.
Well, you know what I see?
I see a mechanical horse with a faceless, depersonalized metallic rider that says, we're going to take the real and replace it with the fake.
So, not necessarily a pale horse, but more, we're going to replace it with falsehood, false reality.
And so, yeah, it says to me, bland, unnatural, artificial.
We're going to replace the real with the fake, the outdoors with the metaverse, etc., etc.
You're going to like this, and you're going to suck it up, peasant.
And in case you were wondering how it was going to be done, they show, oh, here's Marie Antoinette being beheaded via Revolution.
And a lot of people said, poor Gojira.
They finally get an appearance on there, and their appearance is marred with scandal.
They have to get some sort of...
Yeah, they need to get out there.
But, you know, if you're a metal group, you're probably like, well, I mean, hey.
Gotta kick some court of demon credence.
I went back and watched the lighting of the Olympic flame and the Olympic cauldron.
Watched the incredibly tedious, not very exciting scene of them lighting the original flame and then the...
And as I recall, someone mentioned that, I don't know if this is true or not, because I was jumping forward because it was like two hours, or an hour, but they had a horse and rider person actually carried the torch at one point.
Because you carry the torch all the way through town with like a relay.
They had a hundred-year-old Olympian who somebody pointed out would have been like eight months old last time Paris hosted the Olympics.
That was pretty neat.
I thought they had like two trannies or one tranny light the torch, right?
Yeah, that's what I heard.
I don't know if that's actually true or not.
I think if anything, that might have been the original torch lighting and not the cauldron.
Because they had two athletes, one male and one female, light the actual cauldron.
Maybe that's what it was.
But I don't know about the torch part.
Well, because I didn't realize part of the event is actually lighting the torch several months before the event at the Palace of Hera, or the Temple of Hera.
Because it represents the flame of Prometheus being brought down to the humans.
So first you bring it to the Temple of Herod, represent it being held by the gods.
And then after it's lit there, several months later, you bring it to the Olympic Stadium and light the cauldron with it, which then represents Prometheus granting humanity the fire.
So at least that's how I understood it.
Because they were doing a whole ceremony and everything with a bunch of priestesses of Hera and everything before the event.
I didn't actually see if it was a trans person or not who lit it then.
It was, dude.
It was three trans people.
Three different drag queens carried the flame at different points.
Okay, so it was different points through the relay.
Oh, okay.
So they didn't actually light it.
That's how they got away with it.
Because they had a male and a female up there on the actual cauldron.
For when they lit it, it was two of the athletes.
And I looked into it.
If there was any evidence either one was trans, it would have came out.
There's no evidence of it.
Interestingly enough, on the point of everything being fake and artificial, the Olympic cauldron is not actually a flame.
Really? Yeah, it's just, I said, light and water.
It's a light show.
It's a light with ribbons.
It's a light with ribbons blowing up with a fan.
So that's a wrap.
It's all fake.
It's all fake, everybody.
That's hilarious.
Everything's fake, top to bottom, start to finish.
It's all artificial.
It's all fake.
It's all fake and gay, man.
It's all fake and gay.
That's awesome.
Yeah. Awesome, man.
So that's the message of the Olympics.
You know, you go back to the 92 Olympics with the whole prediction of coronavirus with the ships and the attacking viruses or the attacking viral infection and everything.
And then 2012 with the creepy reaper and the nurses in beds and all that.
Doing what kind of looked like a TikTok dance.
It made me think of the nurses doing TikTok dances.
So, you know, they got that predictive programming.
Going on beforehand.
So, you know, it's not exactly a new thing for there to be predictive programming in the Olympics.
But the really notable thing and the thing that strikes me is it was noticed and rejected.
So, people always talk about, you know, this whole occultism, seeking permission from your victim.
Which is frankly freaking nonsense.
Karma doesn't work that way.
You harm somebody, you're going to pay for it.
Don't pretend and don't lie to yourself.
But there is a certain sect of belief that thinks that if you tell people, even in a really oblique way, what you're going to do to them or about them or around them,
that you grant.
Yourself the permission to do that and any negative karma resultant from the harm from those events is then transferred back to the victim because it's their fault for not noticing and not stopping it.
Now, I have never bought into this ever because it's both.
But at the same time, there is a huge...
Yeah, but at the same time, there's all kinds of...
Belief systems that are literally dependent on this working.
And all of those belief systems had to have looked at that and looked at the backlash and looked at the hell no and at the, we don't accept this, this is evil, this is satanic.
And boy, that doesn't sound like apathy, and that definitely doesn't sound like enthusiastic acceptance.
That sounds like rejection to me.
So now that you've gotten the no, it's all on you, and you're going to pay for any shit you do.
So now we ask ourselves, what happens next?
This has never really happened before.
We've never lived in a world where this many people responded and rejected the predictive programming and said, no, no, we're not accepting a new God.
We're not taking a new religion.
We're not losing everything.
How about you guys piss off?
That's never happened before.
So the question you got to ask is, what happens from here?
Because that's got to lead to kind of a...
A real breakdown in crisis and confidence in this whole belief system of, I'm not going to get any negative karma from this, because, you know, you can convince the normies that this system's still intact, but, yeah, the true believer types, they're going to be shook by this.
Oh, yeah, man.
Yeah. I mean, it's a true awakening, and that comes with consequences for the other side.
It's the people against, it literally is the people against the government.
I mean, it really is.
I've said that for things to actually change and for people to actually work out and for there to be a not terrible, detrimental end to all this for everybody, everyone involved is going to have to recognize their involvement in it and how they're making it happen and what's happening.
And, well, we just had another awakening on the dark side, so...
So now everybody knows what's happening.
There's maybe a tiny swath of people at this point that don't.
And more importantly, the people that need to know what's happening and how it's happening are realizing it.
So it's not just simply that more people are waking up.
It's that certain people that were very much trapped in this delusion are waking up.
And that's crucial.
So, yep, the game isn't real.
The ceremony's not real.
It's been wiped from the internet.
It's all fake.
And they even ethered it, so now it's really not real.
It's gone.
It's in the memory hole.
And the memory hole runs deep, man.
It runs deep.
This whole situation is just so fucked.
Like, the Olympics, the whole Olympics is fucked.
The swimmers are jumping in.
Like, shit infested the river.
What river throws your parents?
The sign?
Yeah. So, they're jumping into the shit-filled river because all of these migrants, this cultural mix, this influence of migrants, what do they shit in the fucking river?
And so, the video of the swimmer he gets out, and he just starts vomiting everywhere.
It's so great.
And other swimmers are, like, also heaving.
And it's just...
Oh my god!
Dude, it's so funny.
It's so fucking hilarious.
But the whole Olympics and everything about it is just it's a shit show.
This whole situation is a shit show.
It feels like it's symbolic of the whole plan coming apart at the seams.
It's like this was supposed to be a big triumphant moment where they were going to be out there and be proud and people were either going to not notice like always or just stay quiet and Shut up and ignore it like they always do or,
you know, make excuses and be totally accepting of everything.
But instead, people are taking issue with all kinds of different things and, in particular, taking issue to the symbolism that they try to push every time.
So, yeah, they really screwed up on the Olympics bad.
I mean, one of the craziest restrictions I heard was you can't wear a yellow ribbon because that represents...
Because that represents the Palestinian cause.
But one of the Israeli soccer players had a shirt on it that actually depicted them bombing Palestinian children.
Oh my god.
And so, how's that for a double standard?
No yellow ribbons.
You know, bombing image is okay.
No ribbons though.
That's offensive.
That's not even just a bombing situation.
That is genocide.
That is...
Oh, yeah.
Well, that was a really messed up thing.
I'm thinking, like, this isn't just bombing soldiers.
This is just blowing up civilians on this picture.
That's really fucked up.
Okay, so Iman, I think Imani Khalif.
Imani Khalif.
What's the situation where...
She is now an ambassador to UNICEF, the United Nations Child Protection Fund, whatever that stands for.
Oh yes, that actually segues into our main story now because Imani Khalif is a UN ambassador for Algeria.
Regardless of...
Your audio has cut out.
You have frozen.
You are out of this conversation.
Can you hear me?
Fuck. God damn it.
Alright, we'll give it a few seconds.
Alright, no problems.
We're back in fucking business.
Um, so, alright, welcome back everyone.
So we had a bit of a technical difficulty on Cricket's end there's computer.
Well, no, what happened?
You forgot to plug it in to charge?
I plugged it into the outlet that only charges if the switch is on.
Oh, man.
Anyway. And the switch wasn't on, so I didn't notice it ticking down slowly as I was talking.
Well, we're back in session, and you were talking about Iman Khalif being the UN ambassador.
Yeah. And not that Iman is necessarily directly connected to our story, but he is...
Connected to her, whatever.
I don't honestly know.
I don't honestly know what to say.
She's a biological female transitioning into a male.
She got like a penal implant.
Who knows?
We'll just say Iman.
Iman. Yeah, is a UN ambassador for UNICEF.
Which is ostensibly an organization about helping children and whatnot.
And I didn't read necessarily anything nefarious into Iman's contribution to this, other than that it seems like Iman's entry is really about muddying the trans issue even further by throwing that in the mix.
But at the same time...
Well, they were named a UNICEF ambassador and are named on their website with a nice glowing review that talked about how Iman already intended back in March to seek a gold medal, so this entry is long coming,
actually. That's about enough about Iman at this point.
Let's move on to the main focus, which is what Iman is named ambassador for, UNICEF.
Yeah, UNICEF.
What is it?
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund.
I think I got that correct, right?
I think that's what it spells out.
It's like some of these organizations, they're sometimes in English and then some other ones are in other languages too, so it makes it extra confusing.
Yeah, right.
Yeah, alright, let's get into fucking UNICEF, alright?
This is about child abuse.
This is about an organization that is supposedly supposed to be protecting children, but they are basically systematically abusing children.
So, Cricket, I was reading through some random articles looking for a topic to research, and I started reading into UNICEF, and I soon realized that we just had to do a show on it, right?
And I'm sure you like had some questions throughout our lives about UNICEF and these organizations that people like Hillary Clinton fund and are part of, you know what I mean?
And part of this is all due to the fact that the powers that be have tried to keep the heinous crimes that we're going to be going over today a secret.
What one might call a conspiracy.
This is a conspiracy.
That's what this is.
One big damn conspiracy!
And everyone's in on it!
Yeah, we gotta keep it in the realm of conspiracy.
Otherwise, you know, people might be inclined to believe it.
Now, for those who don't know, the objective of UNICEF is to advocate for the protection of children's rights, to take care of their most basic needs, and to provide opportunities for them to move forward in life.
Ironically, this trusted organization stresses the most common need for children to be, quote, safe, to grow, I mean, doesn't that just sound so amazing?
It sounds very great, like they're doing something really good.
I mean, there's always an inherent contradiction when the help that's needed being withheld ensures whoever's helping gets continued funding.
I mean, after all, if kids got all of those things, they wouldn't need to exist.
Essentially, you're dealing with a group where if their mission is successful, they disappear.
What is it, like, problem, reaction, solution?
And so, like, the UN, the United Nations, they cause problems in these vulnerable countries.
And then they put in UNICEF to go help the children.
Or, you know, I should say, quote-unquote, help the children.
So this first article I thought we'd read from was a statement made by UNICEF regarding allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse by the organization while in the Democratic Republic of Congo for humanitarian purposes, which was put out in September of 2020.
And it's on UNICEF's own website.
So let's check that out.
It comes from New York, 30th of September, 2020.
UNICEF is appalled that people who identify as UNICEF workers have reportedly Hi, I identify as a UNICEF worker.
They just identify, guys.
They're not really.
It's like, do you pay them?
Yeah, but they just identify.
It's crazy, man.
So they reportedly committed abuse against vulnerable women in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
And we have no tolerance for sexual exploitation and abuse and take all allegations of misconduct seriously and there will be serious consequences for any staff who have been found to have sexually abused people.
Exploiting vulnerable women is reprehensible, and those who perpetuate such acts must be held accountable.
This is great.
We encourage all victims to come forward.
Okay? Just come forward.
And we ask anyone with knowledge of misconduct involving UNICEF operations to report it.
So that just sounds sketchy, right?
Hey, victims, just come forward.
Come to us.
Tell us what the problem is.
Tell us your story.
Nobody else, just us.
Yep. And then they're never seen again.
Over the past two years, we have strengthened our efforts to prevent and respond to sexual exploitation and abuse by putting victims first.
Our top priorities are to provide victims with assistance, ensure swift and victim-centered investigations, vet and train personnel and partners, and establish safe and accessible reporting channels.
In DRC, UNICEF has established reporting mechanisms that are safe, accessible, and sensitive to
In addition, UNICEF provided mandatory training in prevention.
Now, hold on a sec.
Who needs to be trained to...
This is how you don't molest that woman and those children.
This is how you don't do that.
We're going to show you how you don't do that.
These people are not for touching.
Not for touching.
No touching.
Stop. Stop it.
Start from scratch here.
Start from point one here.
Go back to the training.
That's just insane.
They're training the people who identify as UNICEF workers how not to sexually abuse children and women.
This is insane.
Back to the article.
Or at least next time don't identify as UNICEF workers.
Yeah, there you go.
Then you wouldn't be a part of it.
You're just like, I'm not a UNICEF worker, so I'm going to go over and abuse.
They're just a creep.
Yeah, exactly.
This is crazy.
It is clear that this is not enough.
We need to do more, especially at the community level.
We are committed to working closely with communities across DRC to end such abuses and to establish a safe environment for victims to come forward.
Oh my god.
Well, I mean, that clinches it.
They don't condone it.
Case closed.
No need to look into it any further.
Said, you know, our government, after roughly half a second of not reading the document they have in front of them.
Oh, my God.
Oh, the skill and wisdom of Inspector Clouseau.
Oh, shit.
Get Clouseau in here.
He'll solve this problem.
He'll start with that child over there.
He can look past things so good.
I mean, that article, man, by UNICEF.
That's in 2020, right?
So this next one comes to us in 2023 and is from, well, I got it from medium.com.
I'll put the links to all these stories in the show notes.
Quote, In a disheartening turn of events, the United Nations Children's Fund has recently reported a sharp and disturbing increase in kidnappings and abductions in Haiti.
Okay, this is 2023.
Do you remember back in 2010 when Laura Silsby kidnapped all those children from Haiti?
Or tried to kidnap all those children from Haiti?
Yeah. Or they just tried to pick them up from orphanages, basically.
Yeah, they took him from orphanages to bring to her fake orphanage, her and nine of her missionary companions that were friends, well, Laura specifically, with the Clintons.
But anyway, as the crisis deepens, urgent action is imperative to stem the tide and restore a sense of security to the beleaguered nation.
They used beleaguered.
UNICEF's report reveals a concerning surge in incidents involving kidnappings and abductions.
The impacts of these incidents extend beyond the immediate victims, affecting families, communities, and the nation's collective psyche.
Children, often caught in the crosshairs of violence and insecurity, are not only directly affected by these crimes, but also experience severe emotional and psychological trauma.
The long-lasting repercussions of such experiences can hinder their development, education and overall well-being, perpetuating a cycle of suffering that transcends generations.
The rise in kidnappings and abductions underscores deeper structural and systematic issues that plague Haiti.
Economic inequality, lack of opportunities, weak law enforcement and political turmoil collectively create an environment ripe for criminal activities.
There go the Clintons.
They're in there.
Reversing the escalating trend of kidnappings and abductions is a complex and challenging endeavor, yet it is an endeavor worth pursuing as it holds the key to safer, more secure, and prosperous Haiti.
Dude, Haiti got fully raped by the goddamn Clintons, dude.
Oh, so badly.
And their cronies.
It's not just the Clintons, man, but holy shit.
They really did some damage.
And then they collected donations to fix all the things they screwed up.
Yeah, they sent, Bill Clinton's first thing was he sent all the old FEMA, like, housing units from Hurricane Katrina.
So they were just, like, hella old, and they were, like, rotting, and they were using them for little schools and shit, and it was a toxic environment.
So bad.
Wait, weren't those the asbestos-laden ones that they couldn't even really dispose of safely?
Yeah, probably.
That's why they were stored, like, in a certain area, and then Bill Clinton was like, oh yeah, just send those.
It's nuts, dude.
Well, I mean, I've covered it a lot in other episodes, but...
Yeah, those FEMA trailers were hostile to human life.
Yeah, they were just moldy.
They were making people sick.
Like, for real.
But, you know, it's fucking crazy.
The Clintons have just done so much damage to Haiti, man, for decades.
And as the old joke goes, have you heard this one?
The only thing that can do more damage than a hurricane is the Clinton crime family.
That's not even a joke.
That's just...
For real, a fact, man.
Speaking of such, back in 2011, after Hurricane Matthew, that's what it was, Hurricane Matthew completely devastated Haiti.
The Clintons were rubbing their bony, knuckled hands together, just conjuring up ways to further rape the country, figuratively and literally.
In the midst of the devastation caused by the hurricane, the Clintons were caught red-handed, kidnapping 30-plus children from a couple different orphanages.
And as easy as it is to imagine Bill and Hillary Clinton running around with just drool pouring out of their mouths, like rubbing their knuckles together, just snatching children like a couple of hairy Pied Pipers, you know?
They refrained from their natural impulses, and their friend Laura Silsby did all the work for them.
And she would actually get nine of her missionary cohorts, and they traveled to Haiti.
Once there, they made up a fake orphanage of their own, and they went around asking other orphanages, more or less, to donate.
The orphans, so that Laura could take them to this made-up orphanage.
And surprisingly, they were caught twice in a matter of less than a week.
And the first time, she and the crew, they tried to kidnap a group of children, were caught.
And the story is that she actually pulled some Mr. Bean-type shit, dude, when she was alone with the Haitian consul in the consul's office, and she somehow talked her way out of this.
Kidnapping children.
And I think the most likely scenario is that while in the console office, a few phone calls were made because she was just let go.
The children were returned to the orphanages that they were taken from.
And then the second time, only a couple days later, less than a week, she and her little clan there tried to get more than twice the amount of children this time.
And they were caught once again.
It was like 33 children, which is an interesting number, right?
And the first time, they were all arrested and charged, but...
All were released except for Laura and her main sidekick, Carissa Coulter, I believe.
And then after a month or so, Carissa was released back to the States, leaving Laura to be the only one to be formally convicted.
But her charges were reduced from kidnapping to arranging irregular travel.
Can you believe that shit?
And she only served three months and never saw another day in jail once back in the United States.
So fucked up.
And the U.S. ambassador to Haiti said they wouldn't intervene with the authorities.
And then former President Bill Clinton and his wife, his wench of a wife, gave a televised statement saying that the first thing that they were going to accomplish with the humanitarian efforts in regard to Hurricane Matthew was to get the missionaries home as soon as possible.
That was like their first mission they were going to accomplish.
That was on live television.
Yep, gotta get the operatives out of there.
Well, I was thinking about making a joke about this, but honestly, it's not a joke.
They actually decided the children didn't identify as kidnapped.
They were just being irregularly traveled.
It's not even a joke.
Irregularly traveled.
The children did not identify as being kidnapped.
Sorry. Those kids, they're not kidnapped because I said they're not.
They're just being transported, guys.
I mean, just think about this noble mission they have to get the kidnapping missionaries out.
I mean, if we can count on anything, it's definitely the honor and integrity of the Clinton family.
I mean, just ask all the people who can't talk anymore.
Oh, the body count.
Oh, jeez.
But get this, man.
Laura Sillsby, right?
She's released.
She moves back to Boise, Idaho, where she was from.
And guess where she went to work?
In the most suspicious position one could possibly get after such a history.
And also I would note a position you can only get because your charge was reduced to this odd irregular travel thing because I'm pretty sure kidnapping would raise some red flags.
Right. So this woman who was convicted of kidnapping, let's just say the facts here.
She was kidnapping children for the Clintons.
She gets back to the United States, goes to work.
With Amber Alert, the very system that was set up by Bill Clinton to issue alerts for missing children back in 1996.
And then she changed her name to Laura Gaylor.
But really quick, a point on that.
So we know that like around 800,000 children go missing in the United States every year.
And how many Amber Alerts do you hear about each year?
Do you ever hear of any Amber Alerts?
I mean, if you think about it.
The only ambler alerts that people generally hear about are the ones that get pushed through on your phone, which are usually only local ambler alerts for that particular area.
So two, maybe five at the most, possibly up to like 40 or 50 if you're in a major municipality.
But we definitely don't get all of them for everywhere.
And if you think about it, even adding up...
You know, all the different regions.
It doesn't come anywhere close to 800,000 or even a fraction of that.
No, no.
I just looked this up.
I asked Microsoft Bing, how many Amber Alerts were issued in 2023?
And the first article comes up from USA Today.
That year, there were 254 Amber Alerts.
So we had 800,000 missing children in the United States.
And only 254 Amber Alerts went out?
I mean, that sounds about right, because you think maybe 40 to 50 in each of these major municipal regions and far less in rural areas and such, and you're only counting the people that we know disappeared.
Oh, dude, I just found the actual 2023 Amber Alert report issued by them.
Let's look at this.
How often are they actually found?
That's an interesting question.
That is an interesting question.
What list of figures?
Let's see.
That was pretty interesting.
List of figures.
Wow, this is just a tracking thing.
They are tracking all these missing children that they themselves kidnapped to get adrenochrome, right?
I mean, it's a token amount that they're saving here if you want to be generous and say 100% get rescued.
Which is just not even...
I'm going to ask.
Let's see.
How many...
I mean, if you steal $800,000 and return $250,000...
How many...
And those are just reports that went out.
So yeah, we don't even know how many were actually found.
How many missing children...
I guess were found in 2023.
Yeah, how many of that $800,000 get recovered beyond the Amber Alert total?
1,200 children were successfully recovered through the Amber Alert System and 180 were rescued because of wireless emergency alerts.
That's December 31st, 2023, the end of the year.
1,200 children were found.
Those are pretty crappy odds.
Yeah, where are the other 799,800 children?
That's like the return your bank gives you on your balance.
That's so crazy, dude.
You're getting the amount back.
So where are they going?
Where are they going?
Answer is not a pleasant one.
No. Nope.
Let's move on to this next article.
Let's see.
It comes from larouchepub.com.
Unicef. Uncover UNICEF Links to Child Sex Espionage Ring by Mark Birdman and Vivian Zocos.
The Belgian director of UNICEF, the United Nations arm for the ostensible protection of children, was arrested June 18, 1987 for participating in an international pedophile ring which used UNICEF facilities to supply children to wealthy pedophiles.
Belgium's UNICEF director, Joseph Virbeek, was only one among 12 individuals arrested in connection with this child pornography and procurement ring.
According to the Belgian police, the ring spans at least 16 countries.
As shocking as this news may be on purely moral grounds, what makes the case explosive is the fact that UNICEF's pedophile activities appear intimately intertwined with intelligence operations.
And UNICEF director Vierbeek was arrested as part of a crackdown on a child-born ring centered in Brussels, suburb of Acheleys?
Acheleys? Acheleys?
I'm not sure.
Acheleys? I mean, it's Acheleys.
I-X-E-L-L-E-S.
Headquarters of the Center for Research and Information on Infants and Sexuality, or the acronym...
Oh, this is fucked up.
What's the acronym there?
CRIES. C-R-I-E-S.
So that's a pretty fucked up acronym to have in such a setting, right?
And it's an example of how the name is actually in a different language, because if you think about it, that doesn't spell out cries in English, so that's got to be...
True. I'm guessing the E is for infant.
Oh yeah, I think so.
For infant.
So that muddies the waters even further because you point out like, oh, it's cries.
This for infant.
And then they say, oh, that's not that that spells.
Oh yeah, Dutch.
Fucking idiot.
I'm an idiot.
It's Dutch in Belgium.
Just another way to obfuscate people's search for this.
So in Dutch, what does that mean?
Center for Research.
I'm going to look this up.
Okay, this is what it would be.
In Dutch.
I don't even know what that is.
Oh, man.
So, it would be C-O-I-Z-S.
C-O-I-Z-S.
In Dutch.
Yeah, the French en font just rolls off the tongue so much better.
Okay, so that's what that is in Dutch and all that crap.
But in English, cries?
Come on.
It's a child pedophile ring in Belgium.
Cries at the UNICEF facility.
That's fucked up.
And they call it cries.
I mean, through the most tortured way of interpreting the acronym possible, no less.
So fucked.
Anyway, back to the article.
Already five years ago, the director of CRIES was arrested for using his high-security job at the Belgian Ministry of Justice to procure and leak classified documents.
Other CRIES members have been arrested for similar espionage activities.
For intelligence professionals, the combination of pedophilia and intelligence gathering points to a likely Soviet involvement in the entire affair.
EIR, or the Executive Intelligence Review, was started by Lyndon LaRouche.
I mean, he had a federal conviction for wire fraud or some shit like that, and he was attributed to being the godfather of conspiracies.
So you know that the FBI had him in their sights, 100%.
And he's dirtied.
For real, dude.
Lyndon LaRouche.
The ideal subject.
And the ideal subject, because he's dirtied, so he's got to do what you tell him.
Yeah, he's got a great website.
I would put that down, Executive Intelligence Review.
It's really good, dude.
Yeah, he gets the cream.
It's crazy shit in there.
So back to this article.
The EIR has in the past published extensive documentation of another United Nations-centered international pedophile network with documentable Soviet tracks.
That was the case of WICCE.
Is it like Wiki?
Yeah. A UN organization.
Which is the coordinating center of a self-avowed neo-pagan movement headquartered in three cities, Geneva, Moscow, and Rome.
It was founded on...
A letter off of Wicca.
That's what I know.
Wiki, Wicca?
What is that?
It was founded on the initiative of Assistant UN Secretary General.
And you're not going to believe this, Cricket.
Robert Mueller or Mueller?
How is it?
Robert Mueller?
Mueller? I think it's Mueller.
Mueller? Yeah.
So Robert Mueller...
At the 1976 Year of the Woman conference in Brussels, Belgium.
So Robert Mueller, he gets around.
Yeah, apparently.
I mean, author of the Mueller report, I wasn't sure.
But yeah, it is apparently the same guy.
And honestly, when you look at what he was doing, you'd really think his future job is a bit of a ground grade, wouldn't you?
Unless you think that his job isn't actually either one.
And his job is just to do the bidding of whatever he's ordered to go do.
And it was more convenient for him to be embedded in the FBI at that point.
But he had connections to Whitey Bulger.
So, you know, mob connections.
Yeah. That means that you got some organized crime supporting you.
He kept innocent men who were framed in prison, which, well, that's just scummy.
Oh, dude.
Yeah, they literally framed, the FBI framed four men.
I forget what, some sort of murder, I don't know, corruption, conspiracy charges or something, framed them and put them in prison, and Robert Mueller knew, and he kept them there.
He kept these innocent men in prison.
Part of the perversion of the legal system and turning it into the Just Us system is deliberately keeping people who are found innocent in prison afterwards.
So it demonstrates that it's more about punishment than rehabilitation.
Yeah, he was an assistant DA and also a U.S. attorney in Boston.
He was appointed the FBI director after all of that by George Bush, of all people.
I mean, come on, 9-11?
But he wrote, yeah, he wrote some letters to that parole board to deny clemency to those four guys.
Yeah, screwed him over just like all the prosecutors and stuff did more recently to the Coots 4 up in Canada.
Those poor guys got really screwed.
And I don't know if they ever went to trial or anything at this point.
But yeah, it's kind of as a demonstration of this.
Perversion and justice is happening everywhere.
I find it kind of weird.
He was appointed FBI director on September 4th, 2001 by George Bush.
So you know he was part of that whole 9-11 conspiracy.
You know that, dude.
This is a conspiracy.
One big damn conspiracy!
Oh yeah, and of course...
Who would be doing most of the investigative work on a domestic terrorist incident?
It would be a joint coordinated effort between, well, the newly created Homeland Security and FBI.
So he would actually be laying the groundwork for the future surveillance state also involved with DHS since he would have been working at Ground Zero.
Yeah. He's dirty.
Dirty guy.
Yeah. All right.
Back to the article.
In Moscow, Wiki or whatever operates out of the offices of the Soviet Women's Committee under Jelena Aleksandrovna.
Studies by EIR of mass murder cases and countless international pedophile rings, which in the United States alone, are responsible for victimizing as many as 400,000 children.
And remember, only 1,200 children were rescued in 2023.
What the fuck?
Anyway, they've consistently turned up wiki involvement.
So, hmm.
The pedophile activities are used to provide Soviet and other friendly intelligence networks with lavish opportunities for blackmail and espionage.
The involvement of UNICEF's Belgian organization with international pedophilia was uncovered when police conducted a sweep of UNICEF's headquarters on June 18, 1987.
According to a statement from a police spokesman, the sweep was motivated by a broader investigation centered on the Brussels Center for Research and Information on Infants and Sexuality.
Cries. Evidently, a computer was used to distribute pictures of these children to a list of 400 wealthy clients who would choose sexual partners from among the children available.
As a result of these findings, the Belgian authorities arrested two UNICEF employees.
The first was the UNICEF caretaker.
Mitchell Falou, as well as its director, the 63-year-old Joseph Verbic.
Formerly a journalist for a leading Belgian agency, Amish Language Daily, apparently a website or something, Verbic has used his UNICEF position to procure children, often from broken homes, for his international clientele.
Since UNICEF is the best-known child-help agency in the world, it was doubtless easy.
Doubtlessly easy for Virbic and his associates to procure large numbers of young ones for sexual exploitation.
According to the Belgian police, names of infants as young as 8 months in age were found in the UNICEF basement computer that stored the children available internationally to pedophiles.
Virbic, however, was not operating in isolation.
Dude, holy shit.
8 months.
And the acronym is CRIES.
Oh my god.
8 months.
Uh, um, and I, okay.
According to reports published June 20th in the Italian Daily, I don't know, what is that?
Il Missagero?
The investigation into the UNICEF-linked international pedophile ring extends to Holland, Great Britain, France, and Switzerland, and obviously the United States.
Obviously it was.
Among those arrested, apart from Vierbeek and Fallou, were eight other Belgians plus one Swiss and one Dutch citizen.
The hub of the entire network...
Where at least one arrest was made already last March is apparently the cited CRIES organization.
Under the guise of studying so-called infant sexuality, CRIES and its affiliate offices in Switzerland and France gained access to children whom authorities believe it used to serve as pedophiles in about 15 different countries.
crass joke, but isn't a joke.
We were just using those children for research purposes.
Infant.
Infant sexuality research.
Why is there even a thing?
I mean, the fact that that even exists is already revolting.
Exactly. How is that even a thing?
And here it is.
Most of Western Europe, the United States, Canada, Japan, various African countries, it's all over.
As shocking as this news may be on purely moral grounds, what makes the case more explosive is the fact that UNICEF's pedophile activities appear inter...
This is so shitty, dude.
Crys is also the link which ties the pet file activities of this network to elicit intelligence operations.
It was investigations into the Crys network which led authorities to UNICEF.
Another trail led across the border to the Netherlands, where police found a photographic laboratory stocked with thousands of feet of pornographic film.
Christ was founded by one Philippe Carpentier, a former functionary of the Belgian Justice Ministry, arrested five years ago after leaking secret documents.
Carpentier's high-security position at the ministry was that of a translator of documents from the so-called Trevi Group, and this refers to an interim ministerial body involving Western Interior and Justice Ministries that coordinates intelligence and police work in the battle against terrorism.
I mean, the way the world works is just so fucked up.
And every one of these people got dirtying.
You'll notice that it's always something along the lines of, oh, they were convicted for this, they were caught doing this, they got nailed for this, and then after this they went on to do this horrific work that they were never prosecuted for.
It's so crazy.
It's so crazy, man.
And this guy, Carpentier, he was passing intelligence over to terrorist networks.
He passed a bunch of files to the Belgian Vice Squad, to the leftist magazine Poor.
He passed on secret reports and documents of Interpol Weisband on the German Red Army Fraction terrorist gang.
He's just, like, throwing all this information around.
And for these unrelated activities, Carpenter was jailed for five years.
However, his job at the ministry was handed over to another Christ figure, Mitchell Decree.
And why and how this outrageous breach of security occurred is still to be investigated, which never will at this point.
In any case, what is known is that Decree predictably continued Carpenter's intelligence activities.
And for that, he himself was arrested in March, just the next year, 1988.
According to Belgian sources consulted by EIR, their job in the Ministry of Justice had given Carpentier and Decree, who were simultaneously involved in child pornography procurement activities, access to some of the most sensitive information passing over the diplomatic and bureaucratic tables of Europe.
These people in highest positions are running child pornography rings, child sexual whatever, porn rings, whatever it's called, pedophile rings.
And it's all for intelligence, dude.
Because what they do, and I think most people know this, is they get people, these public figures, and they put them in a situation where they are filmed with underage people, in some cases eight months old, dude.
They're filmed, and then that is used as blackmail against them to carry out the shit that they do.
Like, always eroding the rights of citizens.
Those people who are in charge...
Of making those laws are the people who are filmed doing these activities.
They are all blackmailed.
This entire government is blackmailed.
I mean, I've seen some fringe ideas where the concept was essentially that you have this diplomat and he hooks up with this attractive lady and then they tell him afterwards, oh, she was actually 16 or she was actually 14, not 18. And we're going to be in trouble now,
so you got to do what we want.
But you can't play those kind of games with eight months.
Give me a friggin' break.
You're being participatory at that point.
I don't care if it's...
Unless you're being held at gunpoint, you want that crap.
It's just so disgusting.
So even though it's being held as blackmail, yeah, you're willingly involving yourself at that point.
If nobody's threatening to kill you if you don't do it, I don't see a...
I don't buy anything less than that as an excuse.
Yeah. And Felipe Carpentieri played a huge role in the Elm Guest House in Belgium that was known for their honeypot intelligence gathering involving children, which was also busted in the 90s alongside the Detroit Affair, which was yet another global elite pedophilia child murder ring,
which was also busted.
But these rings don't just stop.
They just go further underground.
And I think I did the Elm Guest House episode, like, 52 or something, I forget.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, the whole point of having a Patsy every time to hang out to dry is just so...
They can have a public display of punishment or at least humiliation while they're setting up shop elsewhere so nobody's looking into, okay, where are all the people that didn't get caught when this thing got busted go to?
That way the industry continues undisturbed always and nobody really gets caught.
I mean, are they going to actually release those names to the public?
I mean, they always claim this stuff.
They say they're going to do it.
And then suddenly this 11th hour illegal challenge comes.
And there's always so much money involved that you can't even break through it hardly because the people suing to stop it have such deep pockets, it's almost impossible to fight.
You basically have to bankrupt yourself to lose anyway.
The whole system is set up to make you fail.
If you're not part of that big club...
You're just an enemy of them, dude.
We are all enemies of them.
They don't like us.
They do not like us.
You know, like, what was it, George Carlin with the whole the government is in a big club and you're not in it?
Remember that stand-up he did?
Ah, yes.
It's a big club and you're not in it.
It's great, great stand-up.
I mean, it's a...
I mean, essentially, if you're not...
I always say that.
If you're not meeting with your senator to talk over the donation you just gave him...
He's probably not your constituency.
You're probably not his constituency.
He might send you a nice form letter back if he's fairly kind.
Otherwise, yeah, your priorities don't even exist to him.
No, dude.
Let's go to this article from 2018 from Krasfiles.com and source from Rebezi.com titled, UNICEF Produced Child Pornography.
From the basement of its offices in Brussels.
With the child sexual abuse scandal that UNICEF is caught up in right now, it is important to remind the public that this organization has always been a haven for pedophiles, and it always will be.
It's probably not far from Nambla, actually.
Remember Nambla?
Like, whatever happened to Nambla?
Yeah, North American Man-Boy Love Association.
I mean, at least Nambla, kind of like Prostasia, which is the...
Which is like the underage anime enthusiast version.
They just have that shameless honesty going for them.
If you're going to be dysfunctional, you might as well own your dysfunction and just say, yeah, we're disgusting.
The secretiveness almost makes what's happening here worse.
Nambla, dude.
I'm going to look this up.
Let's look up, where is Nambla now?
One of those, where is this famous person now?
Where is NAMBLA now?
San Francisco, California.
That's what comes up.
They're in San Francisco, California.
Doing the same thing as always.
Trying to achieve acceptance unsuccessfully.
Okay, this is from Vice.
Does NAMBLA still exist?
What the hell?
Why is this coming up?
I don't want you.
As far as I know, they still exist.
Like, they never...
Like, I don't think they ever just folded over into the overall GLAAD or anything.
Let's see.
That was a totally separate issue.
Whatever happened to NAMBLA?
This is 2016.
Too many people learned what the acronym meant?
Is what happened to NAMBLA.
Yeah, it will likely be decades before this has decided to give an honest, non-hysterical conversation about kids and sex.
What the fuck?
That was on Twitter.
This guy is from NAMBLA.
I just want to see how they're doing, man.
Like, do they get fucking disbanded?
There are only a handful of people ostensibly still involved.
A self-described former NABLA member who called himself Ike Icarus told me on the anonymous pedophile chat site, boychat.org.
Sounds like, flew too close to the sun, eh?
It's an anonymous pedophile chat.
Boychat.org is a legitimate anonymous pedophile chat site.
What the fuck?
I guess they probably have a lot of those, right?
Yeah, it's kind of like that website that keeps rebranding itself.
What was it?
Rapey. What?
Whatever. It was X-I-L-I-W-I.
And yes, it is exactly what you think it is.
It started in 1978.
And it just disappears and just keeps reappearing as another site.
Just boom, taken down, reappeared.
Pops up like a hydro.
Pie in the sky goals were visibility and social acceptance.
Yeah, they're just outgoing and just really trying to push it.
Which is really interesting, dude.
Look at this.
I just found this on Twitter, dude.
So there's an Australian judge says that the law is out of date about sex with children and that sex with children should be legal.
All right, they're having these discussions.
Well, we always knew that they would try to push this.
As soon as there was nothing else they could push.
And a lot of that has to do with the other social acceptance things.
A lot of that had to do with eroding against social norms.
But honestly, I think this, in terms of overall human psyche, this is more like a species-level revulsion that people have for it.
So I don't really know if you can necessarily...
Fully culturally change it.
There's always going to be a level of disgust associated with this, no matter how much you try to make it socially acceptable.
There will be way more people against it.
Yeah, there's always going to be that gut reaction of, no, this is gross.
I don't care if you tell me it's okay.
It's still disgusting.
Yeah, and check this out, dude.
Jen Mason, okay?
Jennifer Ida Mason.
Jennifer Ida Mason on Instagram.
This comes from Washington, published July 5th, 2022.
Washington State School Board Director to teach sexual pleasure class to nine-year-olds at sex shop.
The classes will be held at a local sex shop called Wink Wink.
So, Jen Mason, Washington State School Board Director.
Teaching sexual pleasure to nine-year-olds.
What's going on?
I mean, that's a...
That's a world past having a drag queen read a story now, isn't it?
That's a bit too blatant for people to really accept, which I'm guessing that story just gets very heavily suppressed.
Oh, of course.
No, it's gone.
It's gone.
No one cares about that.
As long as it's not on CNN or Fox, it don't exist, mister.
Yeah, exactly.
Exactly. If it's not the rhetoric we're pushing out, it's just not real.
Yeah. And then from there, all you got to do is get to the major part of the normies that are online and get them not to talk about it, and boom, you've memory-holded it completely.
If it's only obscure levels...
Where it's being discussed, it's never going to break into mainstream at all.
Because that's been the end run that screwed over the mainstream news on so many things is that they're no longer the actually dominant culture.
They have a lot of dominance, but they don't run everything anymore.
So now they have to almost launder their propaganda through these more normie type networks to make themselves more palatable.
Because you just can't buy out the whole Twittersphere and the entire YouTube network and BreadTube and all that crap.
There's just too many people to pay off.
Absolutely. And that brings us to the New York Times.
So in 1987, they reported the arrests which followed the discovery of a secret photographic studio in the basement of the Brussels building where UNICEF's offices were housed.
The studio was used to take photographic photographs of children, many of whom were North African origin.
The police said, More than 1,000 such photographs are seized, along with a mailing list of some 400 names in 15 European countries that have been prepared on the UNICEF office computer.
Among the current explosive stories coming out, this is one that just hit the headlines last week.
Former UNICEF child rights campaigner Peter Newell, Peter Newell, I guess, I don't know, Newell.
who led the global effort to jail parents who spanked their children as a disciplinary measure.
He was sentenced to six years in British prison for raping a young boy who was just 12 when the predatory United Nations official began raping him.
This news ironically came immediately after Professor Andrew McCloud told The Sun There are tens of thousands of aid workers around the world with pedophile tendencies, but if you wear a UNICEF t-shirt, nobody will ask what you're up to.
Remember, I identify as UNICEF and just wear a shirt.
He also estimated that the UN employs around 3,300 pedophiles.
There's 33 again.
We've said it before and we'll say it again.
The crimes against children committed by UNICEF are beyond the comprehension of most people and the potential for further abuses is the same.
There is no reason to doubt the activities mentioned in the title of this article still happen today within the organization.
UNICEF is a deceptive, hypocritical, and highly dangerous organization.
Children should be kept away from them at all costs.
Yeah, they should not be around children.
The United Nations...
I mean, the really gross thing about all of this is he cloaks his disgusting ways in concern for the kids.
But what he really wanted was more kids separated from their parents, making them easier and simpler to exploit.
I mean, that's downright chilling.
He expresses concern for children's safety and rights, but what he really wants is unaccompanied minors to exploit.
Yeah. And this dude was leading.
He was jailing parents who spank their children as a disciplinary measure.
And I was spanked growing up.
I don't know about you, Cricket.
I was spanked.
I was hit with belts, with spatulas.
If I did something bad, boom, I got something.
You know what I mean?
Teach you lessons.
I always compare it to nature.
In nature, when an animal goes near a cliff and the mother needs to dissuade it, does it tell the baby animal, stay away from that cliff and bark at it?
No, it nips it on the butt because from then on, it's going to remember, when I went near that cliff, my butt got hurt.
Exactly. And I don't encourage spanking children and all that.
I'm totally against it.
I grew up like that.
I fucking hated it.
I don't agree with it.
Not good, but sometimes you do need a lesson.
There's a certain point where that's the only correction.
The problem is when people use it for situations where it's not the baby animal heading towards the cliff.
It's just minor disagreements, and then you spank them anyways.
That's where it gets abusive and wrong, where you start assessing that even the slightest mistake is going to get you hurt.
That's a totally different scenario.
Yeah, I just can't believe that UNICEF, man, these people...
Just running child pornography rings in their offices.
It just boggles my mind.
I just read about how bad these people are and how they've done this shit forever, I guess.
You know?
Forever. I don't know.
Yep, they say they've done it for 30 years, but that's just under the organizational banner.
I mean, anything you suspect they might be capable of, they're already doing it, and probably worse.
I mean, they're very consistent at that.
You never look into it and find out, oh, they were actually doing a lot less horrible things than we thought.
That never seems to happen, ever.
Never happens.
Oh my god, you see articles like, well, you do see those, and they're just complete bullshit, and he's like, what the fuck?
When they just prop up certain politicians, you know, like Kamoto Harris.
It's just crazy.
Yeah, they gotta create, well, you know, they gotta create that perception, that magical quality that her voice used to have that got people...
Following her like a Pied Piper still works.
She's just like Xanaxed and wined out, dude.
Just one bottle of wine and like a Xanax and that's just her life constantly.
That's her base level.
That's her equilibrium right there.
It's like her spell was designed to work on the average news reader viewer.
Somebody who watches someone else read the news.
MSNBC viewers, Fox viewers, CNN viewers, all of them.
All those big names.
It's vapid.
It's non-existent.
There's no substance to it.
It has this verbosity that almost feels like a high schooler trying to fill a word count.
But there's also an almost hypnotic effect where...
The people who do listen and think she's amazing really do seem genuinely amazed by it, which is really the most amazing part about it to me.
Because I listen to it and I just think to myself, I've heard AI-generated script that is better than this.
I've heard five-year-olds talk better than this.
It's crazy, dude.
How does she get propped up to this position?
I mean, you know how.
We're not going to get into it.
This is a whole other fucking story.
Oh, yeah.
Holy shit, man.
I mean, Biden has, like, literal gibberish.
Shurigunaba to pressure is his lines.
Her lines are things like, people of the community are part of the community.
She repeats herself using different words.
It's so funny.
That's what makes me think it's a spell of some sort.
It's just repeating the same non-sentence mantra, but it's more about just getting you mesmerized than it is about conveying any real information.
It's like all the pop music coming out.
Who's that?
Taylor Swift or whatever.
All that music that comes out, they chant.
They chant these words.
Yeah, the repetition and the magical.
Repetition and everything.
And people get into it because these Satanist Luciferian worshippers, they need our permission.
They want us to be involved in what they're doing.
And so they get us mesmerized like that.
And the people that chant that, they go to these concerts and they hear this stuff and they chant these words.
They have no idea what they're saying, but they're just repeating it.
But they have no idea what they're doing.
Yeah, it's just...
It's just another way to get people living unconsciously.
So then if you get them on your wavelength, they just naturally move on to the next thing you think about because they aren't even thinking.
Just looking at a screen nowadays, you know, from tell a vision to having a fucking phone, a mark of the beast, you know, mark of the beast.
Mark of the boost!
Anyway, let's go elbows first into this next article from 2018.
It's titled...
People do accept that a lot over a chip, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Well, the chip's coming.
The chip is coming.
But we got the phone already.
Yeah, maybe it's just going to be like, put the chip in your phone.
It won't even be in your skin.
I mean, that's just a crazy point that I didn't ever really think of.
Everyone did just kind of accept that.
Yeah. Everyone has a phone, dude.
Like, they're giving them out to people in, like, Apple and shit.
They're giving all these phones out to people in these, like, remote villages.
Oh, yeah, what was that article?
Like, those villagers, they said it was a fake article.
Yeah. But once they got phones and internet access, they got addicted to porn.
They got addicted to porn and started fighting on social media.
And so fucked up.
But they are doing that, though.
They are giving phones out to everybody.
Why do they want that?
Why do they want everybody to have a phone?
So you get the news, so your god can tell you what's next.
Yeah, so the AI god can direct your life.
So anyway, what's this report called?
Report, or the article?
Report finds that UN employees, of which 3,300 were diehard pedophiles, and they were responsible for 60,000 rapes in the last 10 years.
An outright frightening dossier released by a former senior United Nations official reveals that United Nations employees have carried out over 60,000 rapes in just the last decade.
What's more, the dossier estimates that the organization currently employs at least 3,300 pedophiles.
33. In just 10 years, under the guise of rendering aid, the United Nations has literally been raping and pillaging countries across the world.
The problem has gotten so out of hand that it prompted the former UN insider, Andrew McLeod, to blow the whistle and hand over the evidence to Britain's Department of International Development Secretary.
Britain's Department of International Development Secretary, Priti Patel.
Priti Patel.
I've heard that name before.
Where have I heard that name?
According to the exclusive report by The Sun, the dossier reveals that on top of the 3,300 pedophiles working for the organization, thousands more predatory sex abusers, I identify as UNICEF, specifically target aid charity jobs to get close and vulnerable women and children.
But they had to name that number again.
They had to throw out that 3,300.
Yeah. Even though they admit that there's more, they still had to name the 3,300.
3,300.
According to McLeod, anyone who's attempted to blow the whistle on the horrifying rampant abuse is silenced and fired.
Sharing his dossier with the Sun, Professor McLeod last night warned that the spiraling abuse scandal was on the same scale as the Catholic churches.
Dude, that's massive.
That's massive.
So systematic, and when people get caught, they're reassigned, is what that means.
Yep, moved around, moved around.
While the report reveals that there are 3,300 current employees who are active pedophiles on the UN's payroll, McLeod estimates that the real number is far higher.
I was going to say, dude, that's got to be way more than 3,300.
If it's as big as a Catholic church scandal...
That's a conservative estimate, then.
Very conservative.
We're just being friendly with this number here.
Quote, there are tens of thousands of aid workers around the world with pedophile tendencies, but if you wear a UNICEF t-shirt, nobody will ask what you're up to.
You have the impunity to do whatever you want.
It is endemic across the aid industry across the world.
Endemic. The system is at fault and should have stopped this years ago.
Yeah, but it's not because it's running the show.
Yeah, I mean the fact that people look at it.
And just don't ask any questions, but just know that that is what they're for, is the worst part about this.
It's like open secrets.
Yep, yep.
Open secrets, which is also a really good documentary, I think.
Open something.
According to the report in The Sun, Professor McLeod worked as an aid boss for the UN all over the world, including high-profile jobs in the Balkans, Rwanda, and Pakistan, where he was chief of operations of the UN's Emergency Coordination Center.
He's campaigning for far tougher checks on aid workers in the field as well as the abusers among them to be brought to justice.
And wants the UK to lead the fight, which they're not because the UK right now is in civil war with migrants, with illegal migrants.
The Professor Grimm's 60,000 figure is based on UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres' admission last year that UN peacekeepers and civilian staff abused 311...
Victims in just one 12-month period over 2016.
And that number, 311, is also a really big Luciferian Satanic Mason number.
311, very powerful number, like 9-11.
The UN also admits that the likely true number of cases reported against the staff is double that, as figures outside of war zones are not essentially collated.
Collated? But again, they've got to drop the number.
Yeah, 311, man.
They're putting numbers out there.
They're telling people.
And then they're even admitting, this isn't really the total, but we have to say this number.
Yeah, 311.
Why 311?
Okay, Professor McLeod also estimates that only 1 in 10 of the rapes and assaults by UN staff are reported.
As even in the UK, the reporting rate is just 14%.
Nobody wants...
What happens when you go to these people?
They fucking silence you.
Yeah, I mean, the real question is, is that really how many rapes get reported, or is those just the ones that still get out?
Yeah. The rest of them just kind of get quietly shut up.
Based on evidence from Professor McLeod, ex-Cabinet Minister Priti Patel also resigned in November last year.
This week, accused senior officials at DFID of being part of the cover-up.
Jesus. Quote.
Child rape crimes are being inadvertently funded in part by a United Kingdom taxpayer.
I know there were a lot of discussions at senior levels of the Yemeni nations about something must be done, but nothing effective came of it, and if you look at the record of whistleblowers, they were fired.
We are looking at a problem on the scale of the Catholic Church, if not bigger.
In a blow to victims of human trafficking worldwide, a massive child sex ring was exposed in Haiti involving international peacekeepers with the United Nations as well as other high-level officials from around the world.
And no one went to jail.
Not a single person.
For years, UN peacekeepers, their high-level commanders, and other personnel from around the globe came to Haiti for sex with boys and girls as he was 12. In Haiti alone, more than 300 children...
I've come forward in the last decade with these claims, and only a tiny fraction of those accused have ever faced any form of accountability.
This is nuts, and we wonder why we are in a perpetual state of war everywhere.
You know?
Well, just like always.
All the tragedy and crises have to be manufactured.
I mean, you've got to keep the madness machine revving because it's an unnatural state of being, so it's not going to sustain itself.
You have to constantly provide it with your own and others' energy to keep it going.
And, well, the best way to do that is to keep a perpetual state of war and conflict.
Yep. What's this next one here?
This next article, we will be mentioning a name we previously mentioned.
Oh, Peter Newell.
Yeah, let's talk about this.
A leading child's right campaigner who helped governments around the world tackle the issue of abuse has been jailed for raping a 13-year-old boy.
Former UNICEF consultant Peter Newell admitted three counts of a decent assault and two counts of buggery.
Yes, that's what that means in British.
Oh, God.
And was sentenced to six years, eight months in prison.
News of his imprisonment comes with miswarnings that predatory pedophiles are exploited in the AIDS sector after 125 British charity workers were accused of sexual abuse in 2017.
The head of the United Nations Children's Fund in Belgium resigned today after the disclosure of a child pornography case linked to the Belgian branch of the organization.
Joseph Virbeek, 63, director of UNICEF Belgian Committee, charged him with inciting minors to debauchery.
All right.
Debauchery and buggery.
It just sounds funny.
It's disgusting, but buggery is just a hilarious word.
I mean, they could have just used the R word, but no, we got to say buggery.
Although that's probably a legal term over there.
I think it is.
They've got some weird names for legal terms.
Buggery, I think, is one of them.
Among those arrested was another UNICEF employee, Mitchell Falou, mentioned earlier, 45 years old.
Police say he was organizing evening computer classes for children in the organization's offices.
These children were then sometimes made to post their pornographic photographs, the police said.
And it's like, why is that lady, that Washington State teacher, whatever director, is doing a sex class for nine-year-olds in a sex shop?
That's some pretty blatant corruption of abuse there.
What's going on, man?
I mean, at nine years old.
I don't even know if you'd fully understand everything you were being explained.
Or could.
Maybe, maybe not.
Odds are probably not.
I think I was the age when I first saw a Playboy or something.
And it was just like, what?
What are they doing?
What is this?
Yeah, now imagine if somebody said, okay, now let's have an in-depth explanation of what you saw.
Yeah, it would blow your mind.
Yeah, you wouldn't be able to handle it.
Yeah, you wouldn't know what to do.
There's a reason that that's kind of like kept away from children below a certain age.
Exactly. Who was the head of UNICEF?
William Anthony Kersop Lake.
Quite the name.
He was the executive director of the United Nations International Children's Fund.
He's an author, academic, and former American diplomat, former foreign service officer and political advisor.
He has been a foreign policy advisor for many Democratic U.S. presidents and presidential candidates and served as national security advisor under U.S. President Bill Clinton from 1993 to 1990.
This is just that process that we've gone over on each of them of how they get dirty to make sure they're compromised.
But I mean, there are like all these data points.
I don't know.
Black children.
Holy shit.
Like they prefer black children.
And pedophiles infiltrating high levels of governmental and non-governmental organizations and the CIA intel deep state community lurking in the shadows nearby.
So apparently they prefer black children.
I don't know what all this means.
They were making brochures, dude, of black children available with their prices.
Kids are housed.
The level of casual, the just casual expression there.
Just, oh, here's the pricing sheet.
Here's the menu.
Really kind of demonstrates how much it's normalized in these circles.
Like, they don't find anything at all off-putting about this.
They know they have to hide it, but at the same time, in between them, they don't really bother at all by it.
Yeah. It's just all normal.
And they're taking blood.
They have warehouses full of children, and they take their blood.
Got to look into the shit though.
I mean, got to investigate and get this stuff out.
It needs to be talked about and exposed because all these articles and all this information, it just gets swept under the rug because the media is just, the cycle is so quick.
So much fucked up shit happens all the time and we're just going through it.
I mean, we can't even cover all their scandals.
They've had so many.
So many.
So fucking many.
And of course, what was, what of course...
Was the UN's thrust during all of these years as they were passively allowing child abuse in their ranks?
Well... Drawings.
Drawings? They were going after drawings.
Yeah, there's been a thrust over the years on a few different occasions where the UN has gone after all that...
Oh, like the manga?
Yeah, which falls into the whole we need to protect children sort of bubble.
But I can't help but think that it sure is convenient that it wouldn't hurt this industry at all if every single one of those operations was shut down.
It wouldn't cut down on the number of actual children going missing in the slightest.
And back in 2019, they were actually trying to push through a resolution that they wanted other countries to sign on that were going to grant human rights to these drawings and effectively making depicting them in sexual situations the same thing as actually producing child porn so they could shut them down.
Well, nobody actually says this.
But this is a finite universe with finite resources.
And let's be honest, we don't spend enough on child trafficking as is.
And this would have absolutely diverted more money away from actual child trafficking operations and towards these drawn pictures to protect not actual children.
And as hilarious as it is to imagine, you know, like armed agents busting into some seedy little house and there's like a half dozen people sitting on the floor all bound and they just kind of walk past them and walk up to a poster and say,
who hurt you?
Who touched you?
What happened to you?
Oh, and I guess we'll free these other kids too.
It's hilarious and everything, but it's a very real problem where...
They wanted people to prioritize drawings over actual victims.
That's crazy.
And it seems like the most ostensible thing.
Like, you know, oh, it's provoking people to want real CP, etc., etc.
But what we're missing out is, again, finite resources.
There's already been like whistleblowers complaining that they were diverting attention away from sex trafficking operations to go after Jan Sixers.
We're already dealing with a vanishingly small amount of people going after this level of enforcement, and they wanted that number to go lower to save the imaginary children.
There's just clearly, clearly, clearly not enough money going to stop this stuff.
When they could stop this shit, they could.
Well, at least put a pretty big dent in it, at least.
We'll never stop it.
The big problem is they use all these resources to go after the fucking Joe Schmo down the street or whatever, right?
The fucking small fish.
They're not going after these big rings like this.
Every once in a while, they'll toss us like, oh, pedophile ring, 12 people arrested in Florida, you know?
But those are just small fish.
They're not going after the fucking...
Big fish.
They're the fucking sharks.
The fucking sharks, dude.
And a key point is that those ones are the ones that are publicized.
A lot of times you'll find ones that are only reported in local news and very small numbers.
The ones that get really publicized, I can pretty much guarantee those big ones, like the bust over at Disney, those involve people that don't have any direct intelligence operation connections because those are the ones that are going to hang out to dry.
Because anyone doing the research into them is just going to find, oh, they were just perverts exploiting children.
But the ones that only appear in the local news, those are the real juicy ones because a lot of times those are the ones where you'll look back and they'll have intel connections and such.
Because if they have to hang out somebody to dry, the next step is to try to suppress the news so most people don't know it happened.
And who runs the news?
The same people who do this awful shit.
Exactly. So of course it's not going to get reported on.
I mean, you don't even really have to tell people, don't report on this stuff.
This stuff doesn't even show up in the desk of these newsreaders things.
These people don't even pick their stories.
They're handed news in the first place.
Independent journalists have been long since drummed out of this industry.
Yeah, dude.
Let's fast forward to this 2021 here.
WHO, the World Health Organization, okay, now WHO's involved here, and UNICEF aid workers raped and abused at least 50 women in jobs for sex ring while fighting Ebola in Congo.
So this is 2020, people.
World Health Organization aid workers raped and abused dozens of women in a jobs for sex racket during the Ebola outbreak.
Which really feels like it would increase transmission.
This is pretty intimate contact.
That's fucked, man.
A total of 51 women have accused doctors and other staff of the WHO, UNICEF, and Oxfam of sexual exploitation in just one city in Congo.
Aid workers have been accused of sexual abuse, including rape, in allegations revealed after a year-long investigation.
The victims alleged they were plied with drinks and promised jobs or promotions in exchange for sex in the city of Benai.
Benny? Benny?
Some were ambushed in offices or hospitals or locked in rooms by men who threatened them.
Remember, these are men who say, Hey, I'm Bunicef.
I wear a shirt.
Threatened to fire them if they refused sex, according to claims made as part of the investigation.
The women claim that they were so desperate for work, which was paid at 40 to 80 pounds or 50 to 100 dollars in American money, a month, more than twice the normal wage.
What? That it became normal.
What the fuck?
Twice the normal wage?
You get double the pay.
Apparently you can do literally anything to somebody if they're desperate enough that they need it.
And that actually makes this a lot more gross because...
This isn't people hooking to pay off college.
This is people hooking to eat.
They're trying to live and survive.
To survive.
This isn't investing or saving.
They're exploiting people who would otherwise just go die.
Nuts, dude.
The victims, some who worked as cleaners and cooks, alleged that men refused to wear condoms during their abuse and at least two women became pregnant.
One 25-year-old cleaner said she was already working for The Who.
Not the band.
World Health Organization.
When a doctor invited her to his house in 2018 to discuss a promotion during the Ebola crisis in which more than 2,000 people died in Congo.
He said he shut the door and told me, there's a condition.
We need to have sex right now, she said.
He forced himself against me and kept pulling off my clothes.
I started crying and told him to stop.
He did not stop.
Wow, it's like the Isekai anime, except someone actually tried to use that line in real life.
There's the disease.
We need to have sex to save...
That's actually the premise to some rather nasty porn.
So fucked.
I hate this shit.
And that's kind of crazy because who is the lead singer of The Who?
Because I mentioned The Who.
Pete Townsend?
I believe, right?
Roger Daltry is the singer.
Right? Roger Daltry.
Yeah. Yeah, Peter Townsend.
Do you remember that shit when he was fucking charged with child pornography?
I vaguely read...
Do you remember that?
I think a headline about it?
It wasn't exactly widely reported, as I recall.
Yeah, because he was buying...
He used his card.
He got caught because he used his credit card.
He was online looking for child porn.
And he used his credit card to get it.
And the government, I guess, found it and traced it back to him and he was arrested for child pornography.
But he said, you know, he's super famous.
Super fucking famous.
And he said, no, I'm not a pedophile.
I'm just doing research.
And they just fucking dropped the charges.
He got off, dude.
There's that research purposes again.
It's research.
And yeah, Peter Townsend.
I mean, the really gross thing is that they're admitting that, yeah, that's what the research was intended to find.
We were going to rape people and that's our research.
So crazy, dude.
Well, that's another woman.
Let's see.
Let's go through this.
Another woman said they were exploited by men from Congo's Ministry of Health while charities including World Vision, UNICEF, Oxfam, and Medicines Sans Frontieres, MSF, who also have been implicated in the investigation by the New Humanitarian and the Thomas Reuters Foundation.
So, Doctors Without Borders gets implicated too.
That's what Medicines Sans Frontieres is.
Doctors Without Borders.
These allegations came as the WHO has been bashed for its handling of coronavirus pandemic.
Of course.
Pan-plandemic.
That's fucking bullshit.
Boy, it really puts a terrible spin on that whole social distancing thing.
You need to stay six feet apart unless we're having sex.
Yeah. But then you still spread it, apparently.
Well, we need to...
Through sex, they try to say.
There's a condition.
We need to have sex right now.
We need to have sex right now!
That's just so insane that that...
It is.
Because, listen, Oxfam said it did, quote, everything in our power to prevent misconduct and to investigate and act on allegations when they arise, including supporting survivors.
They are the ones doing it.
We asked them nicely not to.
I mean, what else do you expect out of us?
To punish people for raping?
Come on.
We looked really hard without our eyes open and couldn't find a thing.
In 2002, aid workers from more than 40 agencies, including the UNHCR, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and Save the Children in West Africa.
That's another one, Save the Children shit.
They were involved in extensive, extensive sexual exploitation of refugee children, offering food rations in return for favors.
That's 2002.
Yeah, I'm guessing when people were thinking of Save the Children, they weren't thinking that the unspoken end of their title was For Us.
It almost feels like the starvation aspect makes it worse, too.
Again, here's another example.
Food rations for favors.
So, do this degrading, horrific thing or die.
So nasty.
You see all these pictures of just these starving children.
Just bones.
It's so horrible, man.
Ugh. Trauma or starvation.
What a lovely option, right?
So fucked.
I hate it, dude.
And just look at how many of these quote-unquote peaceful, save-the-children type organizations are just predatory in nature.
I mean, I can understand, you know, if there's like one or two people.
In these organizations, there's a catch over a period of like a long time.
But when it's thousands and thousands of your organization's workers are raping and molesting, something is amiss.
And on top of that, other people that aren't even a part of your group identify with them because it helps them get away with it.
So you actually have a reputation of you use the excuse of you're part of this group and you get away with it.
And ultimately, if a job's going to involve working around vulnerable people like children or abuse survivors, anybody who can be got at easily, a certain percent of people are going to want to exploit that because that's just how human nature is.
People are going to want to seek advantage.
A certain number of people are not going to be able to resist that temptation.
That's why when they hire these people, such as teachers or guidance counselors, anything involving working extensively with the vulnerable, they usually involve extensive background checks, personality testing,
etc., all that stuff.
Those things are in place to weed these people out.
If a group ultimately ends up with a massive over-representation of those kind of people in their group, It's neglect at the very best and laziness.
And it's frankly intentional at worst.
And I'd lean more towards intentionality because you had a certain point where you just can't accidentally miss this much abuse.
No. No, dude.
This is encouraged.
It's encouraged.
Let's just face the facts here.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, they want pedophilia to spread all over the place.
They're trying to get it so normalized.
And just listen to this, man.
This is UNICEF and the Who, okay?
This comes to us May 13th, 2023.
Title's called UNICEF says restricting children's pornography access infringes human rights.
So you go to their site.
A recent report from the United Nations Children's Fund says that any attempts to block children from accessing online pornography could qualify as an infringement of human rights.
A 2020 EU Kids Online Study claimed to have gathered data from 19 European Union countries proving that most children in most of the countries We're, quote, neither upset nor happy,
end quote, after viewing pornographic images.
The study even claimed that 39% of children in Spain were, quote, happy, end quote, after exposure to pornography.
Yeah, so, I mean, I was happy, too.
Remember, like, at first, it's new to you.
It's, like, it's kind of exciting.
It's extremely exciting.
And it can be very addicting if left on check.
So, this isn't good.
Instead of children finding out about things on their own, at their own pace, when they're ready, they just want to force it on them when they're as young as possible.
This is insane.
Almost ensuring that crime rates in the future will increase.
You know what I mean?
Thereby necessitating the need for more police, more military, more man-hating, and these young porn-addled minds will grow up to be porn-addicted, thus carrying on the entire cycle of destruction as their abuser.
It's the classic, the abused becomes the abuser.
It makes the journey of self-discovery into an industry.
I just can't believe it, man.
They want children to be looking at porn.
If you stop your child from looking at porn, they could sue you for infringing their First Amendment rights.
Your own child, who's like 5, 6, 7 years old.
I know, how cruel.
Oh my god.
This is so crazy, dude.
The people running the show want to make it legal to have sex with children, and they are certainly trying to.
They're spreading their shit everywhere.
The study concluded that there may be a number of reasons why children would intentionally seek out sexual content, and that access to the latter may provide an opportunity for children to ask questions about sexual identity and puberty.
The study led UNICEF to believe that there is no conclusive evidence to prove that pornography harms children.
What? As long as you cherry-pick the studies that you funded, I'm sure you can get that conclusion.
Some of these organizations, they'll fund and they'll have one side of the conclusion and they'll have another study that says the opposite.
They fund both sides.
Anyway, so listen to this.
Quote, any efforts to block children from accessing pornography might online infringe on their human rights.
End quote.
Yay. Yeah, wow.
It's based on an expansive interpretation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Have you ever heard of that?
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
No, I think that's what the stuff like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights comes from, but nobody ever really talks about that particular document.
No shit.
Yeah, it's crazy.
According to the Center for Family and Human Rights, UNICEF also claims that asking for age verification to access pornography online may deny children access to what it calls vital sexuality education.
What? What the fuck?
It should be noted that critics charge comprehensive sexuality education is pornographic and harmful to children.
They need to understand that 100% of all step-siblings have sex.
Step-siblings.
That seems to be the...
It's all essentially adjacent to some actual perversion they can't depict.
Furry is adjacent to bestiality because they can't actually depict that.
Right. The stepsister thing is because actual incest is illegal.
They can't depict that, etc.
But they want to push the envelope as far as they can by having something adjacent to it.
Wow. But not quite there.
Just mostly there.
And yeah, there's a lot of abuse on that mainstream content.
So check this out.
After the UNICEF released that report saying that children should have access to porn, the U.S. Agency for International Development announced its renewal of its long-standing partnership with UNICEF, committing an additional $300 million in direct program funding.
The U.S. is UNICEF's largest government donor with 2020 funding, reaching almost $994 million in humanitarian and development programs.
So, yeah.
They're like, yeah, children should watch porn.
And then these agencies in the U.S. is like, here's a billion dollars to fund it.
I mean...
What the fuck?
They're taking our money to traumatize children and say, this is research.
That's what this is.
Yeah, so there are some that are against it.
Lisa Thompson, Vice President and Director of the Research Institute at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, she says, UNICEF's report ignores the vast body of research demonstrating the harms of pornography to children.
By ignoring the real harms pornography can have, UNICEF is playing roulette with children's health and safety, Thompson says.
Mainstream pornography contains horrific sexual abuse, rape, incest, racism, all of which children should not consume.
UNICEF's milk toast assessment?
What is that?
Have you ever seen that word?
Milk toast.
Milk toast?
Milk toast.
It means...
Incredibly mild to the point of almost being pathetic.
I love that.
You have a super milquetoast opinion.
Like an opinion that would upset nobody is basically what they're saying.
I love that word.
So UNICEF's milquetoast assessment of the impacts of hardcore pornography on children does nothing to challenge the political narrative that pornography is benign and as a result puts children in harm's way.
So, I mean, yeah, if you're looking at violent porn, you can watch.
I guess that makes sense because they would probably get in.
They would search it, most likely, eventually.
I guess there's a lot of violent pornography out there, though.
Well, at the time, internet usage was less prevalent, so a lot of people's first exposure was to not really porn, but just seedy movies,
late night.
That weren't quite pornography.
All that borderline stuff.
And all of that stuff was actually really romantic.
It wasn't very violent or anything.
Yeah, exactly.
On HBO, late night HBO, there was a certain time it became hardcore.
Maybe like softcore porn on it.
Yeah, and they would play all that borderline stuff that they could just barely get away with on television.
Yeah, and nowadays, somebody could jump onto a site and search for pretty much any kind of horrific abuse or kink they could possibly want.
And in a way, it almost makes the whole thing dull.
Because there's no uniqueness or excitement to all the perversion and weirdness if it's all perverted and strange.
Exactly. In a 34-year period, everything has just been completely inverted by the Luciferian lizard petto people, dude.
Completely inverted.
And you have these male trans going to schools where liberal teachers are the majority to teach children about sex ed through storytelling time and the books they use are pornographic.
These books are available to the children from the school libraries which illustrate how to get the best oral sex as children, dude.
It's crazy to me.
Like, who makes these rules?
Is Nambla doing this?
Is somehow in this?
I mean, it definitely sounds like something they would get behind.
When it comes to the illustrated books, they definitely look like they were written by somebody who would unironically claim denying a kid's access to porn is a human rights violation.
I could definitely see the two sides being aligned here.
The conversation is so hard to have on this particular issue, though, because anytime somebody actually brings up...
The whole, hey, they got all these weird porny things in schools and such.
It gets countered with this general opposition to censorship argument where they talk about burning and banning books in general and how they just want to ban books.
But, of course, the trick is no one ever leads with Flamer or Genderqueer as these books are being banned.
It's horrible.
Everybody always says, oh, it's Mouse and Catcher in the Rye.
Et cetera, et cetera.
And here's this book about Anne Frank.
But, oh, look, it's not the Diary of Anne Frank.
It's actually the graphic novel with a sex scene added.
Jesus. But, you know, let's just miss that.
Let's just leave that part out and say, they're banning the Diary of Anne Frank.
This is disgusting.
So, yeah, like, the entire thing is designed to be cloaked in obfuscation.
And the end result is nobody ultimately raises too much of a protest about the actual porn being taught because all these people stand up, quote, against censorship because the Germans banned Mouse in the 40s or some crap and the Catcher in the Rye was banned by people at one point,
etc., etc.
Yeah. I don't know why people like why that's such a good book.
I read it.
Who's the author?
I forget.
J.D. Sillinger.
That's his name.
J.D. Sillinger.
I don't know why it gets so much hype, dude.
Have you read it?
I actually found it to be an extremely unimpressive book.
C.S. Lewis had far more literary talent than J.D. Sillinger.
Honestly, the thing that keeps that Catcher in the Rye book being so famous Has always been the weird intel connections that people have made, whether real or not real.
In particular, the movie's conspiracy theory really cemented that in people's minds, where now it's very much connected to intelligence and MKUltra and mind control and all that stuff.
To the point where it's become less about the book itself and whether it's any good, and more about the symbolism of someone having or referencing the book.
Yeah, and the whole hype about it, obviously, is when John Lennon was shot by Mark David Chapman, and Mark David Chapman was reading Catcher in the Rye, and he had it there, and then Lennon walked up and he shot Lennon.
And the idea is he effectively read some coded programming that caused his Delta.
His Delta programming to activate, at which point he went and performed an assassination.
And that's the same with Sirhan Sirhan.
That's the non-fiction connection, is that it isn't just simply Mel Gibson in conspiracy theory who is connected between Intel and Catcher in the Rye.
That's just the pop culture reference to these actual stories.
And that building that John Lennon was living in, I don't know if you could name it, but that's where Rosemary's Baby was filmed, too.
It's a crazy movie.
Which was a book about the child of the devil.
Yeah, exactly.
It all connects.
It all fucking connects.
Man, but let's get into this because this is crazy, man.
The fact that a lot of politicians and legislators have openly advocated for lowering the age of consent.
And like right now in the United States, the age of consent in all 50 states is between the ages of 16 and 18. NAMLA wants that age down to 10. The World Health Organization wants it down to 12. George Soros and the Hillary Clinton type want it down to third trimester,
newborn at the latest.
Oh, God.
But check this out, man.
It's fucking...
Well, UNICEF is all about that.
Eight months?
What the fuck?
Check this out.
In 1880...
Alright, we're gonna do a little history here, ladies and gentlemen.
A little history here.
In 1880, 37 states had an age of consent that was 10 years old, including...
Delaware. So in 1880, 37 states had an age of consent that was 10 years old, including Delaware.
And 10 other states had the age of 12. And 10 other states had the age of fucking 12. I mean, it'd be at least a little less concerning if you knew it was about actually protecting kids from getting in trouble, making dumb mistakes, you know, self-incrimination and all that.
But... I think we all kind of know, regardless of how much we lie to ourselves, that this is really more about adults hooking up with them, not Romeo and Juliet side issues.
So that's the part that's really gross.
And then the thing is, historically, obviously the age of consent would have just simply been lower because when you're going to die at the age of 40...
21 is a little old to be expecting you to be fully ready to go.
They kind of need that earlier.
But the other aspect of that is at the age when you would be married to someone at that age, there was also a lot more family support.
Your whole family was giving you over and everything.
If something abusive was going on, it would be a lot harder to hide in such a situation because there'd be all these I mean, there was a time where everyone was just – it was expected.
Because you were going to die by 20. It's not.
Like, it was expected.
Like, you were expected.
Yeah, once you hit puberty, you know, once the girl hits puberty, like, they saw that as a sign.
Like, okay, she's fertile.
We can have a child and continue life.
You know, it's probably how they saw it, but it's kind of fucked up, dude.
I don't know.
Yeah, it's a tricky, muddy thing because there was definitely an era where it was more about necessity.
Yeah, right.
It's just we're well past that point where you can't really use the excuse of low lifespan to argue, no, we need to rush this.
No, you don't need to rush this anymore.
You can wait.
You're going to survive long enough.
Yep. And shout out to Delaware listeners.
Look, this is crazy.
You probably know your own history, but check this out.
In 1871, you guys, Delaware, lowered the age of consent to seven years old.
Woo! Seven.
We did it!
Why? I wonder what the decision for that was.
Why did they, like, when did they go to the Senate, whatever, and they had a meeting, and they go, oh, we think age needs to be lowered.
Let's do seven.
Everyone, seven?
So, like, yay, yay, yay.
You know, there's like one nay back there, but he gets fucking silenced, right?
It's like as soon as they can talk, they can consent.
That's awful.
Dude, seven.
What the fuck?
And then came the later 19th century and they cleaned things up a bit with the social purity movement created by Christian feminists who were able to get the age of consent raised up to 16. They wanted it to be 18 or 21, but, you know, they settled with the angry politicians at 16. But Hawaii and Georgia remain at 14 for quite some time,
until 1995 for Georgia and then 2001 for Hawaii.
Most of South America is 14, and there are various African countries where it is 12 and lower, such as Nigeria where it is 11. The Philippines, it's 12. But there are also numerous countries,
particularly in Asia, which includes the Middle East.
Like Yemen, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Palestine, Gaza Strip, Pakistan, Oman, Kuwait, Iran, Afghanistan, and also Sudan in Africa, where there is no legal age of consent defined in law.
And as long as the two people are legally married, then anything goes.
So yeah, that shit's pretty crazy, dude.
What do you think about that?
Yeah, that actually makes sense, which countries did that.
Given the culture and also, ew, that's really gross.
But it's okay because the UN is going to go, is right on, yet again, trying to give drawings human rights and not actually fix any of this crap.
Because they tried to do the same thing in 2023, rather than fix any of this age of consent BS.
They actually went after Japan.
And then the funny thing is, is one of the things they were attacking Japan for is some preceptors have age of consent of 13 and whatnot.
And you think, what was the point of even attacking them for that if you want it to be lower?
No shit, dude.
That makes no sense.
It's the pot calling the kettle slightly less black.
And so it really made the whole attack that they were doing all the more hilarious when you look into it and realize, oh no, they want the Age of Consent to actually be below what they were attacking all of those folks for having.
And of course, anytime you go into the whole culture of Japan, and this is where the tricky part is, is they're willing to attack Japan because they can hit the drawings and then go after the drawings and use that to kind of, well...
Divert attention and resources away from actual children.
But anytime this discussion of low age of consent occurs...
Mm-hmm.
And suddenly they don't want to talk no more about it because of course they actually don't even oppose it.
They actually, and when it comes to those countries, they absolutely accept it unironically and a hundred percent.
And it's even bad if you don't like it.
They never want to have that conversation.
Okay, Japan can be a little weird and gross with their lolly hentai thing.
So let's talk about all the other places where age of consent are lowered or non-existent.
Yeah, let's have that conversation.
And then suddenly nobody wants to talk anymore because everybody has a vested interest in the bullshit.
Dude, what's up with that lolly hentai tentacle porn, dude?
What is up with that?
Well, the original purposes of the tentacle porn was actually a sensor bypass.
Yeah, that's what I was going to say, yeah.
Because Japan was so censored.
That's actually where tentacles came from, the fact that you could not depict genitals.
So if you were getting raped by a tentacle, that's not a piece of genitalia.
It's so crazy.
Kind of like what they call the ahegao face, which pretty much anybody understands looks like a...
Post-orgasm face.
The O face, more or less.
The whole reason that was created was because they weren't allowed to depict anything graphic on screen, so all they could do was show their face looking nasty.
Weirdly enough, all of that weird kinky stuff from that porn actually comes from how restrictive Japan is on their porn.
And then out of that actually came the All the underage shit and whatnot as an offshoot of the overall perversion.
Because a lot of the mainstream tentacle porn and stuff was involving pretty obviously adults like Lady Blue Girl and Lady Blue and all that shit.
It was pretty obviously not kids.
But then they create this thing called the Lolly, which is technically a body type of artwork.
Because you can have a character who is a lolly character that's actually an adult and just has small boobs.
So let's make this even more confusing and harder to discuss.
But then when people are actually talking about it, they're talking most of the time about characters who pretty obviously don't have adult features at all.
Because the characters with small bodies that are adults, they have adult features.
Like birthing hip, large boobs, birthing hips.
Actually, there's some signs in the way they draw their face and shit that's more adult looking too, like slightly.
It's very subtle though and hard to tell.
And of course, there's a bunch of different art styles on top of it, so that muddies the water even further.
And it doesn't help that this entire discussion just becomes a disaster.
Once you get the United Nations involved, which wants to strictly focus on drawings and completely ignore children, and then you look into the fact that they also think that it's a violation of human rights that kids can't get access to this stuff.
It's like, what is even the point you're trying to make at that point?
What are you even saying?
I honestly don't even know what the message being conveyed is at that point.
It's so confusing.
It's all just part of the demoralization campaign.
They're just muddling everything, just confusing everything, muddling everything up, and just inverting and destroying shit and getting people so confused.
It's nuts, dude.
Why would you...
That's what I was talking about.
They fund both sides of this shit.
And even trying to explain lollyculture, it hurt my head just to explain it.
And I've looked extensively into this stuff to try to actually figure out where the hell it came from.
You could imagine somebody looking at it from the outside.
They're not even going to bother wanting to understand.
I don't want to understand.
I just don't.
I'm not into any of that stuff.
I read the argument that – see, I read the argument that the –
The generated stuff decreases the need for the real stuff.
And I'm amenable to that argument unless the exposure leads to a greater addiction.
And so that's the part where I'm like, I don't know if I want to necessarily condemn or not because maybe this is actually protecting real kids.
But the trouble is then...
That you'll get people like Prostasia who are sitting behind saying, no, we want to actually crank it to child porn on top of it.
So then those people make it all the more confusing.
Because they'll just flat out say it because then...
Due to the whole small body type slash young person thing being muddied so bad, you'll get people calling really obviously full-grown adult characters lolly characters when they're pretty clearly not.
And then when you point out that's not what that is, you get the Prostasia guy jumping in behind you and saying, actually, it's okay if you crank, it's a child.
Do not stand behind me.
Because you're just like, yeah, that's not what I'm arguing at all.
And I need some actual studies by people without vested interests to even be completely amenable to that.
Yeah, that's an argument that Congress is going to have to have eventually.
They're having it.
I mean, they're in those conversations.
I feel like I confused myself just trying to explain it.
Like, I don't know if I actually helped anybody understand this because it's such a friggin' mess.
You just made it as confusing as everything else, dude.
Yeah, I just made it as confusing as it actually is instead of that simplified, this is what it is that people try to explain.
I got lost.
I got lost.
Yeah, I'd be lost too.
That's the trick.
I think it's almost intentionally designed to be this confusing because the people condemning it are oftentimes condemning something completely different from what the people are arguing about.
That's like when the politicians pass laws in big...
A list of different things they want to pass, but the politician's like, well, I accept Title I or whatever, and doesn't read all the other ones, so he's just signing the law into place based on that one thing he wants passed without considering all the other shit that's in there.
And, realistically, it's amazing that he even gives it that much thought.
Well, yeah, like Biden, they don't.
They just use a foreign signature.
Sign it, sign it, sign it.
That's our new advanced society where everything is fake, where it's not even a real thought he's having.
It's just sign this, automatic programming.
Okay, I'm told to sign this, so I sign this.
If I'm told not to sign something and veto it, I will veto it.
It could be give everyone joy and happiness for all eternity, Bill.
Wouldn't matter, have to veto it because I was told to.
Yeah, they would veto that in a heartbeat.
I mean, obviously they'd veto that because it would destroy their power.
But even if something that miraculous somehow came through and was really real, they would have to veto it because someone else would say, veto this.
And they're operating as a function and a program and not even really as a human being at that point.
Yeah, so next, let's just quickly go over this article from The New Humanitarian, which is a great publication, titled 25 Years of Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, dated February 11th, 2021.
It's a timeline of various scandals involving sexual exploitation by UNICEF and throughout all these years.
So keep in mind, this is not a definitive list, and there are certainly many more instances of horrific abuse that have been kept in.
But we will soon find out about those, I'm sure.
Beginning in the 1990s, this timeline exposes a long cycle of impunity, grave abuses followed by statements of shock and outrage, and then belated efforts to just stem the problem before another revelation of abuse, either in the same country or in a different part of the world.
In the 1990s, it was the Balkans where the UN was linked to sex trafficking.
It was whistleblower Catherine Bolkovac who exposed the sex trafficking network involving the prostitution of children linked to UN police and peacekeepers in the Balkans.
She was fired from her role as a UN contractor after reporting the allegations.
Just silence.
You're fired.
In 2002, West Africa, there was another major child abuse scandal.
The UN's Refugee Agency, UNHCR, and Save the Children found a chronic and entrenched pattern of sexual exploitation and abuse of refugee children at the hands of aid workers in Liberia, Guinea, and Sierra Leone.
The abuse ranges from casual encounters between exploiter and child-to-organization prostitution in refugee camps.
Casual encounters?
What the fuck?
No, it's not a casual encounter.
It doesn't sound very casual.
No, man.
And the UN's refugee chief, Rude Lubbers.
Rude Lubbers?
Rude Lubbers?
Oh my god.
I don't know.
I think it's Rudd Lubbers, but...
Rude Lubbers, I like.
What a terrible name.
Yeah, dude.
He just downplayed the problem, calling these issues very scarce.
They're just very scarce, despite the inter-agency standing committee.
What they say is a top-level forum for humanitarian agencies, finding that the abuse was a global problem.
But Rude Lubbers is like, it barely ever happens.
Nah, this is whatever.
It never happens.
Whatever. I mean, they sure got uncomfortable with it.
Due to all that total immunity, just shoving it right in your face like that.
I mean, the really notable thing to me...
Is we're not reading about a bunch of people mysteriously dying.
They're just getting fired and silenced.
So that's the level of confidence that this operation has, that it can keep things under wrap, is that they knew that these people didn't need to be taken out because they controlled all of the instruments of reporting.
Yeah, they don't really need to kill people.
I don't know, they will if they really have to.
If they have to, if you go write an independent book or something, but as long as you keep going through the proper channels, they know it's never going to go anywhere and they don't really need to shut you up.
And you can tell your story all day to the guy who's going to ignore it.
I mean, it does happen.
Jill Dando in 1999, she was fucking, or 1997 maybe?
1999, I believe.
She was a huge journalist, television presenter, newsreader.
She was huge.
Very popular.
She was executed after exposing and reporting on child abuse, dude.
After getting into some really deep political child sex ring type shit.
Once she was reporting on that, boom, she was shot in the back of the head.
The guy that shot her was arrested, but he was acquitted later.
Dude, it's nuts.
She must have had some definitive dearth then.
Oh, she did.
Something that couldn't have been solved with a simple firing.
Because if they're going to go that level of drastic, then they had to.
It's definitely not the first solution because, well, the mob bump-off is always the messiest solution and therefore the last.
Yeah, and we know the Clintons have killed some very, very high-level people.
I forget who the guy's name was.
But he was killed in a park or something.
He was the second most important person in the world.
After the president.
Or in the United States.
After the president.
He was the second most important person.
He did something with the Clintons, I forget.
But he was shot in a park dead.
I think two bullets in the back of the head.
They said it was a suicide.
The Vince Foster killing?
Yes, Vince Foster.
He was the second most important person under the fucking president, dude.
And there was no investigation.
They were like, nope, that's just suicide.
I mean, that's the really mind-blowing thing, that one of the most important people in the country can just get depressed and commit suicide.
With two bolts in the back of the head.
And let's not look into that.
There's no foul play there.
No foul play.
It really kind of illustrates that pre-internet, when the information exploded, they actually had a much bigger lid on...
Where they could control things a lot better.
The internet really ruined that over time.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, man.
The internet gave us information that only the elite people were supposed to have.
Yep. Yeah, we were exposed to a lot of stuff.
Yeah, I was going to say that Vincent Foster killing is actually the...
Inspiration for the founding of WhatReallyHappened.com.
Oh, really?
In a way, it kind of jump-started the truth movement.
What was it called?
WhatReallyHappened.com.
WhatReallyHappened.com.
One of the original skeptic sites.
Founders Mike Rivero.
Finds himself on the shit list every year as a self-hating Jew.
Usually fun.
Let's get back to this article here.
In 2004, the Dominican Republic of Congo, more allegations of sexual abuse by UNICEF, you know, just more, more, more.
2006, UN issued a zero tolerance for sexual abuse by their employees.
The UN Secretary General Kofi Annan reiterates that in 2003 bulletin rules, those rules include peacekeepers of national armies operating under the UN flag, or just a t-shirt, and added that the rules also extended to consultants and contractors.
Yet the same problem persisted.
The UN started tracking data on allegations of misconduct and two years later launched an online global misconduct tracking system which confidentially tracks and compiles all allegations of misconduct including sexual exploitation and abuse.
And still the abuse continues.
So I wonder what that tracking thing is all about.
Well up until then it wasn't even disqualifying.
You could still contract with them.
With sexual allegations.
And as long as you just go to this tracking center that the UN is doing, bring all your allegations to this misconduct tracking system.
So they're just keeping it all compiled and like hidden.
Oh, it's like, so are they going to lock me up?
No, we're just compiling.
I wonder what that's for.
We'll just compile it.
Why do they want that data, dude?
That's what it's so weird.
Anyway, in 2007, Haiti.
That's a lot of leverage on a lot of people.
I guess, huh?
Yeah, because it's all intelligence.
And it also keeps the individual buckets or the crabs pulling each other back in the buckets too.
Because if any one person says, I'm going to go forward and be public with this, they're not just going to face the apparatus.
They're going to face all the other people terrified of exposure.
If there are any good hackers out there, you guys need to hack that global misconduct tracking system and see what's in there.
By the UN.
That should not be a non-public database, frankly.
If it isn't, it should...
No, we should know.
That should be public record.
So get in there.
Get us the data.
Yeah, if we can't see that, we should.
Exactly. If it's hidden, no, we need to see it.
So in 2007, Haiti, reports of rampant child expectation began to flood in.
You know, big fucking surprise.
At least 134 Sri Lankan peacekeepers exploited at least nine children as sex ring between 2004 and 2007.
114 were sent back to Sri Lanka as a result, but none of them faced any criminal charges.
Big surprise.
Big surprise.
2010, Clint's caught trafficking children in Haiti.
That was what we were talking about earlier, Laura Sillsby.
I won't get into it.
We kind of covered all that.
I don't really want to...
Oh, the one thing, though, interesting.
The sloppiness.
The sloppiness of it was horrible.
But when Laura Silsby was in jail in Haiti, the Clintons hired a lawyer friend of theirs, George Puello from El Salvador.
He was suspected of leading an international human trafficking ring involving women and children.
And he was ultimately arrested after an investigation found that he was actually connected with the ring with children.
So he was wanted in the United States, El Salvador, Costa Rica for his involvement with the network of trafficking Central Americans and Haitian children and young women.
So he was arrested.
And at the same time, though, his wife was also arrested for the same thing.
Isn't that crazy?
And this is the judge that the Clintons personally hired for Laura Sillsby.
No big deal.
No big deal.
Well, they were concerned that if any point wasn't rigged, someone might decide to be ethical.
Yeah, the one judge finally, like, what was it?
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security.
All these agencies were tracking that guy.
So he was definitely part of intelligence.
I'm sure he was running data to people.
Oh, guaranteed.
Jorge Pueblo.
I mean, if people always ask, how do these giant operations stay quiet?
This is how.
Everybody involved is dirty.
Everybody involved has huge...
Swords of Damocles dangling over their heads, waiting to go for if they decide to go public and admit all this horrible shit's going on.
That's how everybody stays in line, is that anybody who learns this much has a vested interest in keeping it quiet.
That's why they definitely have a database of everybody.
Everyone has a fucking record, right, with these people.
I don't know who would be the actual, probably multiple agencies would be keeping records.
Homeland Security, like, on all of us, right?
They have to have records on all of us.
Pretty much guaranteed.
By now, at least they're trying.
If they aren't, they're definitely trying, and they will succeed.
In 2013, there were even more cases.
A leaked UN document revealed that the trace, the true number of sexual abuse stems, the true number of sexual abuse cases stemming from peacekeeping missions may be far higher due to significant amounts of under-reporting.
Surprise, surprise.
The document also said there was sex and race bias among military contingents.
And holy shit, man.
They said that the peacekeeping missions posed the most significant risk.
Isn't that nuts?
Yeah. The actual peacekeeping missions, the actual UN...
or UNICEF missions to these vulnerable people in horrible war-torn countries or whatever they're just biased, man.
They are the most significant risk of fucking violating rules and children.
I mean, if you're going to be involved in this gross kind of industry, you kind of have to view yourself as being some kind of superior human being.
Otherwise, you can't accept that this is okay to do to other people.
Yeah, dude.
Exactly. How do you do that?
So obviously there's going to be sex and race bias.
You're viewing the people you're buying and selling as not human.
I mean, that's the only way you can justify doing this sort of thing without being constantly...
Horrified by your disgusting self.
Yeah, dude.
So in 2015, there were more rape and murder claims skyrocketed in Central African Republic.
Let's see.
Until 2016, the same scandal was continuing and still nobody was fired or held accountable.
In 2017, there was a study on sexual assault in aid and finds that 86% of those surveyed knew a victim of sexual violence by the UN.
That is a horrific statistic.
Yikes, dude.
In 2018, Hashtag Aid2, an investigation by the Times revealed that Oxfam covered up the use of sex workers by senior aid workers in the aftermath of the Haiti earthquake eight years earlier.
Nothing happened other that some donors to the UN decreased their donations for the time being until the dust settled.
Senior. Senior aid workers, who would those be?
Those would be like the Clintons, right?
Yeah, senior aid workers would be, they would at least be the, well, the bag holders, the ones who have the real dirt.
Yeah. It's not going to be somebody low-level, hence why it had to be covered up.
Junior aid workers?
Well, yeah, if it was junior aid workers, they would have just hung them out to dry.
This is disgusting.
We denounce this.
But no, this was higher-ups.
As in, the people who are in charge of protecting others from this happening.
Yep. Yep.
So in 2019, the investigation into the scandal was mishandled at the get-go.
So the New Humanitarian's investigation into the entire mess revealed how a litany of blunders by investigators in the UN sex case abuse in Central African Republic led to dozens of cases being dismissed, and the victims were denied support or...
In that same year, the Human Rights Watch reported that sex for food exploitation by local officials in Mozambique after a cyclone caused extensive damage.
The reports say that the people, including children, were forced to have sex with the community leaders in exchange for the most basic necessities, such as food.
2019. In 2020, Africa, there was further widespread abuse.
Again, the New Humanitarian and the Thomson Reuters Foundation exposed widespread sexual exploitation during the Ebola response in Congo, including the open secret of trading sex for jobs.
And I was going to say, dude, in those Asian countries, yeah, like Kuwait and places like that, Saudi Arabia, they have open air slave trading, slave selling, open market.
Today, in this day and age.
Dozens of women revealed exploitation by staff of UN agencies, NGOs, DRC government, and senior aid officials were appalled and outraged at their reprehensible behavior.
In the same year, in Uganda, the UN launched an investigation into more claims of sexual abuse and exploitation of young women in the drought-stricken Karamoja region.
In 2022, more allegations came out of Malakar, South Sudan.
This is, man.
Victims came forward and spoke about a common occurrence of rape and impregnation by UN peacekeepers.
Some of the women said that they were so worried for their own daughters that they were making their daughters take birth control at a super young age so they wouldn't get pregnant, dude.
How fucked up is that?
That's how chronic that problem is, dude.
Such a chronic problem that their only defense is birth control.
This is honestly one of those stories where...
I just think about the scouring of the earth with just a little bit of fondness and have to remind myself, you're here to advocate for humanity.
It's so bad.
I mean, nobody ever speaks up for these poor victims without...
Much louder voices with huge amounts of money and major, major backing of huge political groups speaking up for the perpetrators to drown them out.
It's like we have far more in place to advocate for the perpetrators than the victims.
And then on top of it, this common theme over and over again, all the way through, of using food as a weapon of sexual exploitation.
It just demonstrates how it's beyond just simply paying somebody for services and actually exploiting and cheapening their humanity in the process of barely feeding them.
I don't understand how the International Court of Justice is not involved in any of this.
Like, they should be on top of this and putting out war crimes.
Or not war crimes, but, you know, whatever.
Fucking genocidal...
What would that be for, like, rapes?
Human trafficking charges of some kind are definitely...
Some shit.
Why aren't they doing anything?
I don't know exactly what the legal technical definition of this BS is or what they'd be charged with, but it definitely needs to freaking happen.
I mean, these things happen.
The more it doesn't, the more emboldened they get.
That's how this was allowed to be such a big and systemic problem.
Is everybody involved kept saying, yeah, but if I reveal this, my life's over and I'm not actually going to be believed anyways.
So it was a very disheartening thing where when people did come forward, they were usually shut up, fired, silenced.
Probably killed a few times.
Oh, yeah.
So it's got to be very demoralizing for anybody thinking about maybe coming forward with evidence on this stuff.
Where you look at the fact that evidence has come out time and time again, just hard, nasty, like ironclad evidence, and it just keeps getting ignored.
Like, how do you motivate yourself to even blow the whistle when you know nothing will happen?
Every single year there are multiple worldwide locations where UNICEF and UN staff are found guilty of committing these crimes on vulnerable populations, including children.
Every fucking year, dude.
Every year.
It just keeps happening.
There's no stop to it.
These are the only ones we know about.
These are the ones they couldn't keep a lid on.
You have to keep in mind how many of these abuse scandals never actually sees even an ex post.
Yeah, like...
And just vanishes because everyone involved is either dead or paid off.
Like the Epstein shit.
Yeah. Oh, Epstein's arrested or dead now, you know, quote unquote dead.
So the whole thing's done.
It's over.
Nothing's happening anymore.
No, someone just took over that position and they're continuing that.
No need to prosecute the perpetrators.
It's not like they moved on and started a setup shop elsewhere or anything.
There's definitely only one island you can bring pedos to.
There's so many.
Oh my god, dude.
It's crazy.
There's like a bunch in Canada.
We gotta get an episode.
But let's see.
It's like every name you think of.
Save the Children, UNICEF, Doctors Without Borders.
Everybody's dirty.
It's all dirt.
They're all dirty.
All those organizations.
All of them.
And you think a lot of people are like, oh, there's probably a satanic part of this.
And I'm like, yeah, there probably is.
They're fucking Luciferian crazy lizard people.
Yeah, dude.
But let's look at this article, Prepare for Change, written by Edward Morgan.
All right, 2019.
It gets into the satanic side of things.
So, inside the satanic occult-themed fundraiser of the world's leading children's charity, UNICEF, Was originally set up to provide emergency food, shelter, support, you know, all that stuff to children in countries that were devastated by World War II, blah, blah, blah.
Fast forward to today, and the organization has apparently become yet another elitist bastion of occult worship and satanic symbolism, and somehow, the public doesn't seem to notice or care.
It's like the Olympics, the opening ceremony, right?
So each year, the organization hosts a Masquerade Ball fundraising event at Clifton's in Los Angeles.
Every year, I guess.
Every year.
And the event in 2018 was disturbingly loaded with Illuminati and occult symbolism.
And why is a children's charity participating in the culture of elite occultism at a time when child trafficking, sex abuse, and ritual abuse of children seems to be at an all-time high?
The organization wants you to believe that the event's theme was just for fun, but it follows a disturbing trend for these type of elite institutions.
According to the official site for the event, the UNICEF Masquerade Ball is UNICEF Next Generation's signature philanthropic event.
Masked guests, dressed in their finest attire, dance the night away in celebration in support of UNICEF's life-saving work.
Over 800 emerging global leaders, innovators, celebrities, and philanthropists attend the UNICEF Masquerade Ball each year.
So that's their official fucking say in it.
In the promotional video for the event, found on their website, you can see plenty of rich people living it up in weird demonic costumes and ridiculous expansive design of clothing, all against the backdrop of pictures of suffering foreign children who supposedly need the help of people at the ball.
There are plenty of devil's horns, antlers, and other symbols to make you wonder what is actually the inspiration for such an event.
So yeah, in attendance at the event are a bunch of elite socialites, fashion designers, all those people, all wearing satanic costumes, devil horns, all this shit.
Lydia Hurst was in attendance.
I don't know who she is, but she was in attendance.
Hurst is, of course, the great-granddaughter of William Randolph Hurst, America's most powerful media magnate of the 20th century, and a man known for his position as a 33rd degree Freemason.
So that's Lydia Hurst.
No wonder why she was there.
He started the Initiatives Against Weed back in the day.
His newspapers.
Published the original hit pieces on anti-marijuana back when Henry Anslinger was trying to push the band.
No shit.
He was assisted by Hearst Publications, which first demonized marijuana and then cocaine in almost exactly the same way, claiming that it would make black men rape white women.
That was the old claim.
Holy shit.
Yeah. Literally.
I mean, it's messed up to even think that that was claimed just, you know, that many years ago.
I mean, this isn't really old history.
This is far from, like, Civil War era.
You know, this is like 1910s, 1920s, the pre-Marijuana Acts era.
But yeah, he would publish these hit pieces in his newspaper.
Dude, there's a movie called Not Reefer Madness, but that is also...
Another part of that fucking bullshit.
Oh, Reefer Madness is, yeah, Reefer Madness was made by, was originally actually a PSA movie that, I don't remember the name of the guy, but a famous grindhouse movie maker took the public service announcement and turned it into a shock film.
That's crazy.
And that's how we got Reefer Madness.
Yeah, it was originally entitled something really dull, like the corrupting influence of marijuana on America's youth or something like that, and was meant to be a documentary.
And he took the original footage, added some more violence, added a little more skin, a little innuendo, and boom, grindhouse film.
And it's probably the most effective propaganda film ever made.
It made people terrified of weed.
It scared everybody.
And in the wake of that, nobody asked why this plant, which wasn't really linked at all to violence, was suddenly illegal.
There was another movie in the same year as Reef for Madness just called Marijuana.
Marijuana. It's the same premise, basically.
Like, a woman gets high, she fucking loses her mind, she finds out, like, a child, I don't know.
It's almost like Reefer Madness.
Yeah, it was almost a whole genre of shock films that followed that same kind of, like, theme.
I'm looking to the cover for it.
It's marijuana, weed with roots in hell, not recommended for children.
I can't read that.
But it says, weird orgies, weird parties, unleashed passions, misery.
And misery's written on a needle.
What the hell?
Like a fucking syringe.
And there's just a woman like...
Oh, hi.
That's the best part is they knew that it wouldn't be really scary seeing people smoking it, so they put a syringe in there.
They're shooting up the marijuanas.
Dwayne Esper, Harley Wood, Hugh MacArthur, Pat Carlyle.
Because they knew if they put a guy on there smoking – because they knew if they put a dude on there puffing a joint, that wouldn't be nearly as terrifying as the thought of someone shooting up marijuanas.
Oh, hell no.
I've got to shoot up the marijuanas.
Alright, so check this out.
The Randolph William Hurst guy, William Randolph Hurst, he gave Anton LaVey a lot of help, dude.
And his Avon Publishing published the Satanic Bible in 1969.
Hurst. Hurst did.
Oh man, that's crazy.
Yeah, it's like they're all connected.
Everybody works for everybody and everybody washes everybody's hands.
That's what's weird when you go through these stories.
It's like, they're really crazy.
Soap opera-esque part of it is how it's all just a bunch of examples of the same names appearing over and over again in different roles.
Yeah, all these people, they all have connections with each other.
It's nuts.
Anyway, yeah, there's a lot of satanic stuff going up at the UNICEF parties.
They have a checkerboard padded on the floor, which is obviously a Masonic design and black and white checkers.
It really resembles...
I don't know if you've ever seen those old Rothschild balls.
The parties they would have, it's just like those.
They dress up in weird costumes with horns, super rich people.
Yep, same themes, always with the deer, which I always connected to the older depictions of before Met, really, because you look at those and you think, yeah,
that deer was originally what the older depictions looked like, back before we got this goat man.
So, alright, man.
Final thoughts?
Yeah, because I was about to say, there's a lot of depictions of humanoid animals in these parties.
A lot.
And definitely a lot of examples in Devil's Horns.
The most recent example was Snoop Dogg wearing the pretty obvious goat horns around his neck.
Which, as I recall, he got to hold the Olympic torch at one point in the relay this year.
Somebody said.
Yeah, Snoop Dogg is deep, deep in the Illuminati ship, bro.
Crazy. And yeah, they always just happen to have all of this symbolism around them.
Isn't that strange how it's always coincidentally strange?
The rings, bracelets, the clothes they wear.
I mean, it's like that way Guy was saying.
It's a way of identifying each other because they can't actually overtly say, oh, you're in the club?
Yeah, I'm in the club.
What degree are you, bro?
So it's a way of identifying each other without talking about it.
So what really is the message they want the public to get from all of that symbolism?
Is it just showing us, like, we're in the club, you're not.
Is that what that is?
Man, it's primarily that we're in a club and you're not.
But it's also kind of showing that hopefully you believe in occultism or at least believe it exists because we sure as hell do.
They do, man.
They believe all that astrology.
Yeah, man.
So, I mean, we should learn stuff from them.
Like, I don't know.
That spirit world's real.
And they're tapping into some weird shit.
The important thing to also learn is that...
The stuff they're tapping into and these benefits that they're reaping as a result, they're not free.
They come at a cost, and that cost is coming to call now.
And they think they're just going to turn it over and take over everything.
Well, you haven't paid the price, so you still owe.
And the world's starting to see the effects of that karmic debt as their power.
It's just kind of quiet.
It isn't even really ending in a bang, it seems like.
It's more like ending in a whimper.
It's like it's just slipping away.
Because there wasn't really an overt attack when people rejected the Olympics.
It was just like...
No, this is fucked up.
I don't like this.
No, thank you.
It wasn't like this violent, vicious thing.
A whole bunch of people just went, no, I'm not about that.
And then boom, just like that, they no longer have permission and they no longer have power.
And now they're recognizing that they never actually had license to do this crap in the first place and are freaking out about the fact that that means...
That it's all coming back to them.
Yeah. They literally work them to death, dude.
These musicians that are in Illuminati and shit.
These old fuckers are like 80, 90 years old and still doing fucking concerts.
Oh, yeah.
Like, they work these people to death.
Oh, yeah.
Anybody in the entertainment sphere gets pretty much exploited.
I remember hearing this really sad story about Dave Chappelle.
He had somebody in his life pass away or some kind of tragic thing happened.
And just literally the next week, somebody needed him for some exclusive show.
So they just picked him up and were like, you're doing this.
And it was essentially, yeah, you don't get to say no.
You're saying yes.
This is a yes.
You're doing this.
You're not even given the option to say no.
And it's just so cold.
Like I said, you don't even get the option to be like, oh hell no.
You're just sitting around a bunch of people who are just leading you through this thing.
And you don't even know who the hell you'd reject the offer to.
Who am I supposed to tell no to?
All of these people are just operating as functions and programs.
The actual programmer isn't even here.
Nobody knows who the hell is controlling anything.
Everyone's just controlled.
Yeah, and you said, like, Snoop Dogg or Dave Chappelle lost a family member and they kind of got famous?
That happens a lot.
Lady Gaga, I mean, and then her best friend was that singer, and she was, like, a Christian singer.
Is it Lady Gaga or that other one?
I can't remember.
I think it's Lady Gaga.
But her whole persona was different, and her friend, who was really famous and going places, she was about to do a tour, suddenly she had, like, a great persona, and then she fell off, committed suicide, quote-unquote.
Off a balcony, died, and then Lady Gaga somehow took over the persona and became really famous.
And you see this a lot.
Like, a good family member or friend dies, then that person just becomes propped up.
It's nuts.
I mean, my example is just demonstrating the coldness.
Yours is way more terrifying.
Of how they just don't even care that, you know, oh yeah, you had somebody die.
That's great.
You got a show to do.
Yeah, no.
Like, no even consideration that you might have human emotions, let alone lack.
Like, there's no lack of empathy because they don't even recognize you feel things.
They're lizards, dude.
They're fucking lizard people, but they have no emotion.
They have no sympathy or empathy.
They lack it completely, just like fucking reptiles.
See, and they think that makes them more evolved, but in actuality, that is the reason why they are devolving.
See, the reason the Arcturians were able to evolve past them is because they developed a means of controlling their emotions instead of killing them.
That's the difference.
There's two options as you're evolving.
You can either get your emotions in check so you're not just going to war with each other every time somebody insults somebody's mother.
Or there's completely shutting off those emotions and trying to operate strictly on reason and logic.
But the universe doesn't even operate itself on reason and logic.
So in the end, facts actually do care about feelings.
So yeah, how you feel and whatnot and does influence things and not being able to feel those things is a detriment to your evolution over time.
In the end, we're evolving up, but all they can do is devolve until they actually learn how to feel things again.
Oh, that's going to be a weird awakening.
Yeah, because they've hit the peak of what reason can do, because they can't go to the 5D level through reason.
You have to have a certain sense of emotional.
Involvement and feeling in that.
So if you can't engage on an emotional level, you're actually at a massive disadvantage.
In that sort of way, the Anunnaki are actually significantly less involved than us humans because we're a lot closer to that point than they are.
And the key trick is we're also moving in that direction, and they're moving further away and more towards psychopathy and non-emotionality, whereas we're moving more towards being able to control our emotional expression to turn it into a useful tool rather than a giant flaming sword that stabs the world.
Yeah. So, I mean, most of these top organizations, we know they're nothing more than just child trafficking networks, right?
Used by very rich, powerful people.
Both men and women, right?
We know that.
But check this out, man.
According to the White House, around 25 million people are subjected to forced labor and prostitution that is said to take a profit in of about $150 billion each year.
Other estimates say $250 billion.
But there are a ton of articles that tell us that between $40 and $90 billion is made from the sex trafficking alone.
Who's making this money?
Where's that money going?
And to add to that, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, NCMEC, received $40 million to study and track missing and trafficked children in the United States every year.
And that is their mission statement.
Listen to this.
To study and track missing children.
Those are their words.
To study and track them.
Not save and rescue.
Study and track.
Hey, rescuing will interfere with the merchandise.
Exactly. We're trying to make between $40 and $90 billion here.
We've got to study and track these children.
If they do anything but track, you might affect those numbers and bring them down.
They don't want that, dude.
And so the fact that they're making that much money, and the fact that this problem is going on for so many decades, and the fact that more and more children go missing.
Every decade, coupled with the fact that more money is being made on top of everything else, it just leads to one simple conclusion.
Regardless of your opinion on whether these elite power-bottom cucks are running this UNICEF child trafficking network, you have to at least admit to yourself that this is a very well, very well put together network which can only be operated by people at the highest levels of government and corporations who have the power And money to carry such an operation out and be able to cover their tracks and the tracks of their friends.
You know, they got to protect their asses and just they feign ignorance.
So obviously, to keep such an operation undercover, certain three-letter agencies who are trained to do exactly that are utilized.
It helps that they're constantly underfunded and being diverted away from it.
So that makes things even worse.
But ultimately, even with them constantly looking at J6 instead of sex trafficking, you still can't keep up this level of nonsense long-term without owning all the people who could potentially be sent to stop you.
Because... I mean, somebody's going to eventually notice, wait, what's this line item?
Where are these people going?
What's this information about?
Like somebody not compromised with money is going to find that stuff and catch it.
So the way to avoid that is to make sure that all the people at the top who that information is going to be passed on to, make sure that all of them are at the very least owned.
And then from there, you just...
Well, you get dirt on a few of the lower-level ones, the intermediate people, and, well, that's how you silence everybody.
Because even if there's a few thousand people at the bottom that want to talk about it, they all know they can't and that it's pointless to try because the few people on top are already paid off.
Yeah. It's a crazy situation.
It sucks.
I hate it all.
So everybody, the UN, the United Nations, the United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund, UNICEF, all these corporations and agencies, they're not good.
They're not good.
They're not good.
You've got to expose these people.
You have to get this shit out.
We can't thank you all enough.
This is going to be the end of the show.
Unless we have anything else.
Should we continue?
I think that's about it.
That's about it.
Let's bring this to an end.
That's about as heavy as I can deal with in a given episode, I think.
Yeah, it's a lot, man.
It's a lot to get through.
So we can't thank you all enough for tuning in.
And please, if you would, leave a good review, good five stars, four stars, you know.
A good review will help the show tremendously.
We're just trying to do some work here and help out.
And, you know.
Give your ears a little distraction from the real world.
I mean, I guess we're talking about the real world, so you're not even getting a distraction from the real world.
You're getting a distraction into the real world.
Yeah, a distraction into...
Yeah, no shit.
I don't know.
But the most powerful tool is the word of mouth.
So just go around and tell your homies and homets to listen to the show.
And, you know, when they're like, I don't know, I listen to so many other podcasts already.
Just offer them a stick of gum and a handshake.
I'm sure it's enough to convince them it's all worth it.
And if not, we'll chip away at them.
They'll come around.
Email us, Paranautica at gmail.com.
Follow us on Twitter under Paranautica.
You can join the group on Facebook under the same name, the Paranautica Podcast.
Cricket, where can they find you, kind sir?
That's a lot of cat sounds.
www.theindividual.com is my site.
E at the end.
Individual. E at the end.
Or there's at individualthe on Twitter.
I am frequently on there talking to myself.
That's what we all do.
And always remember, always distrust the government.
Always distrust the government.
Alright everyone, thanks for everything.
Until next time, take care of yourselves.
Take care of each other.
The world is falling apart.
Keep yourself and your family and loved ones safe.
