The episode of "Marine Sniper Zeb Boykin Breaks Down Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover Up" discusses the shooting incident involving conservative political activist Charlie Kirk. Marine sniper Zeb Boykin provides an in-depth analysis, arguing that the wound on Kirk's neck is an exit wound, indicating a shot from the back. He dismisses theories about body armor and other potential suspects, including a man with his hands raised and a police officer present at the scene. Boykin also questions the official narrative, suggesting that crucial evidence, such as high-definition camera footage, is being withheld. The conversation touches on various conspiracy theories and political ideologies but remains focused on the forensic analysis of the shooting incident. [Automatically generated summary]
I was going to pull up your ex account, but if you want to do that, if you want to go find his X account or his YouTube channel where he did the viral video breakdown, it's a very excellent breakdown.
It's very sober too.
It's very sober.
It's very well-rounded.
And that's why I think it's a very important watch.
And for me, I was already kind of leaning in a lot of the same directions that you were leaning, but then your coverage was able to give me a little more clarity.
And then there's actually something I noticed that I think that you didn't that I'd like to present to you.
But why don't you get into your latest?
unidentified
Yeah, so we jump into the latest.
My chat can't really hear you, which is fine.
I mean, they can turn it.
You can turn it up if they need to, but I guess what I'm going to present is just going to be fine.
Could you possibly give me full screen on your end?
But again, it would be that they can't print off fast enough or an exact match of what would need to go here if they replaced the glass.
So they rip all of it.
That's my assumption.
You could maybe argue, hey, you could maybe argue that let me find this image that this image is that they wanted to do this memorial and not have UVU stuff in the background, but okay.
Well, I'll tell you what, let me let me know that you're moving forward in your linear timeline, but bear with me because I want to go back to what you covered before for my audience, because I think that this is the most important thing.
And let's just get like the basic stuff here because, again, this is where people are kind of like getting upset if you reach a different conclusion.
Like, was it an entry wound, an exit wound?
Did he have a vest on?
Did he not?
I mean, to me, there's no doubt there is zero bulletproof vest.
I mean, to me, zero chance there's a bulletproof vest.
I think that that's totally proven.
It's proven that it was an earpiece with a wire.
I showed a very video that would have me completely determine that to be a fact earlier today.
You can see the earpiece.
So, so what the conclusion that I've reached is that the bullet comes in, it jolts his earpiece, and I think you've reached the same conclusion.
And then the earpiece wire flings up.
That's when we see the shirt anomaly.
That's when the microphone goes flying off, and then and then the exit wound in the front.
So, I guess I would just ask you this: how confident are you that that is an exit wound and why?
unidentified
Uh, extremely confident that it's an exit wound.
This is the uh, this is what you're talking about here with the earpiece.
So, when I initially saw this, I assumed it was blood, right?
So, if we're shooting from the front, we have an entry wound here, we have blood out the back.
It would, it would probably be a lot more than that, but that's what we have.
But the problem is when it's out here, it comes back, and so that's that's what kind of made me question what's actually going on here.
Um, I had another side angle, yeah, yeah, there's another side angle.
I might be able to find another side angle that it is like complete, it completely shows that it's an earpiece.
unidentified
I don't know if it's the same one you have, but you can, and that being said, I mean, we have uh, like I said, we have this one, but the problem is that if it's an entry wound, anybody can Google this.
Any amateur hunter knows what an entry wound looks like.
I mean, you can Google an entry versus exit wound and say, oh, okay, that's quite literally obviously that it's anybody saying it's entry is dumb, right?
So, if you have a slug-sized entry, what does the exit look like, right?
I mean, if the entry wound looks like a slug, Charlie shouldn't have a head anymore.
Well, I also think that that could possibly just be from the earpiece, just the force of the earpiece.
But you have another angle.
You have another angle.
And if you go back to the original video, when you were breaking down and you got into the lines and how maybe things don't really add up with the muzzle flash and the distance, but you were saying you're open-minded.
You're not, you don't know, but you're saying you're pointing all this out.
There's an angle where to me, and you didn't, you didn't say this in your stream.
And I don't know if you didn't see it or it didn't convince you of anything, but there's a moment in camera angle.
Pull that.
Yeah, pull that diagram back up.
I think it's camera.
I think it's camera.
I think it's camera four.
There's actually a moment in one of those frames where it looks like to me, you can actually see the moment of impact and you can see the concave happening.
You can see that first wave of entry and it's just like just in his hairline.
So you wouldn't be able to necessarily see it because it's in his hairline, but you can actually kind of see the concave in that moment.
I think that that might be the video, right, that you have on the screen, but it does appear like you can see the moment where something impacts the back of his neck.
And you explained because it's being compressed over and over and screenshotted and re-downloaded.
And unless you have the original source footage, it's hard to get high quality.
Plus, a lot of people were streaming it live.
So that's not good quality.
But even from this angle, Zeb, don't you think that you would see an exit wound?
unidentified
Yes.
I mean, like I said, if it is an entry wound on the front, then it should just blow out the back.
I mean, nothing makes an entry wound that large.
And they say, I mean, the problem is they're assuming the entry wound is because of a recoach off of body armor, but I think I've easily proven that there is no body.
Look, I don't see where anybody has any proof of body armor.
You can see him walking around before the event.
You can see his chest.
You can see his nipples.
You can see his shirt moving.
It's a light shirt.
unidentified
I mean, there's high quality footage before he starts that basically proves that there's no body armor, even beyond me explaining that the shock wave you see from the body armor is not that.
It would sound that the audio doesn't sound like 30 alt 6.
It sounds, I mean, you could maybe get away with like a 308.762.
I think it sounds like a 556.
I mean, I've shot plenty of both, but the problem is it's on cell phone footage.
And so the audio is give or take.
I just don't know.
Another issue is you're sitting in a bowl of concrete.
And I'm not saying it would change up the report and the sound of the shot itself and timing, but I don't see the audio.
If somebody wants to take all of the camera angles, see, I tried this and I just don't, I don't have the audio software to do it.
Right.
I do video.
That's that's what I'm doing now.
It just, I just happen to be in this middle of the Venn diagram of video ballistics and politics.
So here we are.
But if anybody has an audio, I mean, there's, there's eight, nine, ten videos where you can triangulate exactly, I mean, exactly where it was if anybody wants to actually do it and quit running with a single audio video saying 143.
At some point, you have to recognize that you got to do a little bit more work.
You can't keep blocking people that are trying to actually get answers.
And I don't know why people just won't come together.
Even if you disagree on conclusions, it's like we should all be kind of cross-referencing our conclusions with each other's in my mind.
unidentified
You would think so.
You would think so, Owen.
there's a gatekeeping going on if you will and like I said in my stream is no it's his feed is my feed they're asking you to put you on your stream I can split screen it again if you want to go back that's fine, that's fine, y'all got a full sorry, that's my apologies
but yeah like I said the problem is I don't see anything coming from the gun tubers like nothing, like you have some of the truthers that are sending some stuff out you have You have some on the very, very fringe edge of it.
I mean, like I said, add me to the group chat.
I don't know what's going on.
Add me to the group chat.
I mean, I'm obviously being off radar.
Everybody's kind of not touching this whatsoever.
This is a problem across the board.
I mean, no, no shade towards Brandon Herrera.
I like him.
I like his work.
But quite frankly, you are the gun guy, right?
You do the recreation.
So the question is, what are we waiting on?
And I think the obvious answer is somebody got a call.
My opinion on that is I think people are afraid to go against the narrative because it's the Trump administration.
unidentified
Can I caveat that?
We did a stream.
Me and Josh have done a stream specifically on Brandon Herrera and his fight with AIPAC, if you will, and the funding of that and how he lost his, I believe it was congressional seat by like 400 votes where they spent something north of $4 million against him.
I have no animosity towards Brandon Herrera.
I think that he means well.
I think he's an honest guy.
The question is, you have a duty.
You put yourself in this position.
You are that guy to answer this exact question that everybody is asking.
If I had the equipment to do it, I would, but I just don't.
And I think, too, you know, again, like I said, to me, this is a community effort.
And I'm not going to hear these voices that tell me to shut up.
I'm not going to hear these voices that tell me to trust the government.
I don't.
I don't trust the government.
And I think that, you know, if the government wants to earn my trust back with this story, then perhaps they can do that in the future.
But to me, the biggest smoking gun, no pun intended, but the biggest smoking gun is the footage that they're withholding from us.
That camera right behind Charlie, I counted at least three HD cameras that were filming.
So not live streaming, but filming 4K.
So, I mean, you're going to see everything in 4K.
Master frame rate, like you can actually see it all go down in 4K in live time.
And we have not seen any of that footage.
But specifically, the camera right behind Charlie, that would be the one that tells the whole story.
I mean, that would be the one that would be the most conclusive.
And yet we don't get any of that footage.
And guess what?
When they raided the crime scene immediately after, that was the first thing they took down.
unidentified
The very first thing they took was the SD card out of that camera.
Or something to that effect.
I mean, I have that footage right here.
I showed it a second ago.
The question is, what is Homeboy doing?
I don't think the camera is.
I don't think it's rigged.
I just don't.
Again, I think the shot came in from Charlie's right side, exit out the bottom left of his neck.
I mean, the more I sit on it, the higher I think the shooter probably was.
And a lot of these guys that are doing the audio breakdowns are saying they're at like 140 to 200 yards.
And I would, if, if that is a muzzle flash in the window, I would affirm that given the frame rate at 30 frames, that it would put it in about the same ballpark.
And I'm not even, I'm not sure that that's the muzzle flash, but it is consistent and it simply makes sense.
I think this shot can be made a little bit further back in between this gap, but it would have to be like pre, you would have to be there before the crowd got there.
But to me, that's on my, that's way lower down my scale, my scope than some of the things that we're discussing.
And I even think that the one police officer that was to Charlie Kirk's front left that does the this motion, I even think that that's debunked because the timing is a little off.
Again, really weird, really suspicious.
I understand people looking at it.
But if you actually go frame by frame, Kirk, the impact hits Kirk before the guy squeezes his hand when he's pulling up his shirt.
And by the way, that's a police officer.
That's a police officer who jumped the fence and ran to Charlie's aid immediately after that.
unidentified
I would also like to mention in this instance is that this isn't a shot you take, right?
This is a non, like you don't hip fire an assassination on number two MAGA.
I would say I'm not willing to say that one is debunked.
I wouldn't say that one is debunked from my perspective.
I'm, you know, that one's still curious to me, but I, again, I'm looking at more of the, to me, I'm convinced that that is an exit wound and we're not getting the truth about the bullet or even maybe where the shot came from is kind of kind of kind of where I'm at.
unidentified
Yeah, I agree.
I agree.
I mean, I guess just to touch on the guy in the white shirt again, like I said, one, it's a hip fire and two, he's shaking and then he fires.
It's like you don't risk that shot not hitting.
Like not like that.
Like if you're going to, and a lot of people want to say, oh, they were flying around a drone and they shot him from a drone.
It's like these, these types of, I'm not in the industry, never been associated with Blackwater, but these types of assassinations are conventional assassinations.
You don't take risk that you don't need.
And so what you do is you set up prior to everything, you have everything lined up, your shot lined up, everything else, and then you wait.
It's essentially running security, running counter security for the event.
And then you take your shot and then it's over.
If you're high, if you're good enough, you can hide long enough and then escape that way and no need to even try to run away.
But there were reports of that behind that building behind the stairwell is under construction, but I can't confirm any of that.
I will say I noticed that that side where the muzzle flash was, there had been something done there.
It looked like they added some drain pipes or some other stuff.
Because when I was trying to compare videos and images to try to exact pinpoint locate where that muzzle flash is, it became extremely difficult to do because they did do something there.
It looks like they added some electrical piping or some drainage piping or something.
And so it kind of changes to try to figure out where it came from.
So it's hard to really determine where it came from as is it a reflection in a window or was it open air?
unidentified
I mean, I think it was a reflection in the window and it possibly could have been a multi-reflection.
The problem is with reflection is it's an IQ test.
People don't understand reflection.
I don't know if you remember the viral videos that were going around of people putting a paper towel or a piece of paper and then putting an object on the other end and not understanding how mirrors work.
Now, reflection is an IQ test and anybody that doesn't understand it just needs to kind of sit it out.
But the reflection is, yeah, I think it would be outside of the window that it was reflected on.
Which would back up that the entry wound was on the back of Charlie Kirk's head and that the wound we see there in that gruesome footage was the exit wound.
Now, I'm not, and just to be clear with everybody here, and I don't know if you're going to take this further with your live stream as I'm about to go join redacted news.
I'm not even ready to go forward with where this goes next, which was obviously, okay, well, there was a guy on the roof and maybe he was up there with a gun and maybe he did intend to take a shot.
Did somebody know that?
Did somebody have that prior information and decide that they were going to take the shot first to make sure the job got done and then have him as a Patsy?
So, okay, that's me kind of teasing it.
I'm not even, I'm not even, I'm not going there yet.
I'm not ready to go there yet.
I'm just looking at the things that I can look at and trying to reach the conclusions that I can reach.
And to me, these are the conclusions that we can reach.
I think you've done a great job explaining why you've reached the conclusions that you've reached.
But I think, you know, we're in this predicament now where even if even if the government was being honest, nobody's going to trust them, Zeb.
Nobody's going to trust.
Nobody trusts the government anymore.
And why would we?
unidentified
Well, didn't we get all of the Epsom files that we were promised?
Didn't we get the 9-11 file?
Didn't we get everything that we were promised?
Oh, yeah.
And the blank folders, the photo op.
I mean, what are we doing?
I mean, the Trump administration has been an absolute failure across the board.