Owen Shroyer questions Israel’s commitment to a ceasefire with Iran, calling Netanyahu a "psychotic warmonger" and framing U.S. support as a MAGA coalition liability ahead of midterms, alienating anti-war figures like Trump-aligned Tulsi Gabbard. He warns Trump’s unpredictability could backfire, exposing Israeli-first factions while pushing for younger, more aggressive candidates—like Thomas Massey—to dominate politics. Closing with System of a Down’s "Science," he ties foreign policy failures to broader themes of betrayal and generational political shifts. [Automatically generated summary]
Now, when I signed off the war room, the InfoWars war room about two hours ago.
Oh, it's all right.
I've always been on this.
You know, it's funny.
It was first I was attacked for 10 years by the left wing.
I guess, you know, the people on the right didn't really attack you in 2015 or 16.
I mean, Ben Shapiro did.
Mark Levin did.
We'll never forget that.
And there were plenty of anti-Trumpers.
There was the Never Trump story from, I believe it was the National Inquirer with people like Dana Lesh and a lot of the neocons that tried to stop Trump from even getting elected the first time.
They tried to stop him from winning the primary.
We beat them.
We trounced them.
Now they're all following our lead.
And so then we got attacked by the left for eight years, and the left put us on list and put me in prison.
And so that's kind of behind us now.
Now it's the same neocon conservative Republican establishment.
Now we're back to 2015, 2016, where they're putting us on lists.
But that's okay, because within two to four years, they'll be following us again.
So it's just fine.
But who knows?
Maybe they'll put me in prison.
If I'm going to get put in prison for speech again, it will be the right.
I've come to terms with this.
It's okay.
I'm okay with it.
It's okay.
I know what I'm up against.
And we adapt and we overcome.
But, well, here's what's going to happen.
It's already happening.
Now, let's get into the content.
Then I'm going to open up the phone lines.
So Trump announces, the Trump administration goes all in.
They put all their chips in the middle of the table.
And you could say part of it might be, I don't want to say desperation because I don't really think it's desperation.
I don't think Trump is desperate at this point.
You know, Trump doesn't have to win another election, so he really doesn't have to appease anybody.
You know, Trump doesn't have to win another election.
So he's not interested in really appeasing voters.
So I don't think that really matters.
I think what matters to Trump is his legacy.
And I don't think Trump wants war, but he understands this will all go down with his legacy.
He's very aware of this.
He has a heightened sense of it.
So I don't want to say it's desperation for them to come out and declare world peace.
But make no mistake about it.
The noise and the pressure and the heat that got turned up because of the anti-war right and because of the free thinkers, independent thinkers that said, hey, let's be careful here.
Let's not get into regime change.
And here's the political consequences.
Here's potentially the life consequences.
Because of that, the Trump administration had to come out and say, okay, we're getting peace.
We're getting the deal done.
And then they announced the ceasefire.
And so we'll see what the final results is.
But I think what's happened is they're going to let Israel go for the regime change.
I think it's all done.
Israel, until 10 minutes ago when the ceasefire just went up, I don't know if they've broken the ceasefire or not.
You know, that's the hardest thing for Israel to do is stop bombing people, stop killing people.
So we'll see.
But I think the deal was they're going to let Israel go for the regime change.
And they were in the process of trying to kill the Ayatollah, trying to kill his successor.
And then they'll probably bring in the Shaw that everybody saw that just went to the wailing wall and kits the wailing wall with the Yamaka on, and they'll put him in there.
And then they'll probably have good relations.
So it's another Israeli regime change.
And what's going to be funny is we're going to avoid war, Which is what we wanted.
And then we're going to get the regime change, which is what we predicted.
And then they're going to attack us for it.
So, okay, I've been on this ride before.
It's fun.
It's actually one of the most fun rides you can be in in politics is to completely destroy the left and then to have the brainwashed right come after you.
So we've already played this game and we'll do it again.
But all that aside, it's all fun.
And we'll see what happens with some of these bridges and that have been burned and all the nonsense that went down.
It really doesn't matter to me.
I'm not a MAGA-branded person.
And I've supported Trump before mostly everybody.
And it's cost me more than probably everybody combined.
So it doesn't really matter to me.
What matters to me is people.
People matter to me.
And so I didn't want to see the death and destruction in the Middle East.
I didn't want to see the people in Israel and the people in Iran that are oppressed by their corrupt governments, just like we are, have to suffer more of it.
And I think really as a political issue, I think, you know, Americans that really understand what is going on, it's never been more clear that Israel runs our foreign policy and they've got all these agents embedded in American media and politics to make sure that you don't talk about it or you don't notice it or, oh, they're your friends.
And then when you fall out of line, they put you on a list and they send it off somewhere.
But here's what's going to matter.
And this is what Trump, Trump should care about the midterms.
Who really knows what he thinks about the midterms?
Because if the Democrats win, you know they're going to impeach immediately.
You know that's going to happen.
And my fear is getting involved in the Middle East before you did the America first agenda, before you got the Epstein list, before you got the JFK files, before you got the tax cuts, before you got the mass deportations, before you got the deep state arrests.
I mean, you can go on and on and on.
So before you really got the America first agenda, you got the Israel First Agenda.
So people are really upset about that.
But there are people, anytime you get involved in the Middle East, no matter what side of the issue you're on, anytime you get involved in the Middle East, people are just going to be totally turned off.
And so you're already going to have people that aren't going to show up in the midterms because Trump is not on the ballot.
Now you're going to have a lot of political people that will vote every election that aren't going to show up because the situation in the Middle East.
And they're just going to say, I don't care.
I'm done.
Doesn't matter who I vote for.
We always get involved in the Middle East.
I'm not showing up.
And so you took a hit.
The Trump coalition, the MAGA coalition took a hit.
You're going to lose some of the Tucker Carlson fans.
You're going to lose some of the Elon Musk fans.
You're going to lose some of the Tulsi Gabbard fans.
You're going to lose some of the Libertarians, lose some of the Peace Knicks, lose some of the Centrists, lose some of the Democrats.
So now you're looking at a midterm that's, I think, going to be a struggle.
And probably the Democrats are favored to win it.
I think the election tomorrow in New York City with mayor, I think this is going to be a good barometer.
If Zoron Mamdadi, the Muslim commie who's running for mayor in the primaries against Andrew Cuomo, now Democrats lie, cheat, and steal.
So they could rig this election for Cuomo, but they might not want Cuomo.
They might not want Cuomo.
Who's APAC backing?
I don't know.
Do they do the local race?
I'm sure they do.
Who's AIPAC backing?
That's probably your favorite.
But, you know, I get the feeling that some of these groups want radical Islam to come here and take over so that they can continue the demonization and then get Americans to get involved in the Middle East, which is what we've seen in the past.
But aside from that, I think if Momdani wins and upsets Cuomo, I think that that'll be the first barometer that, okay, the Middle East issue is going to be the big issue in the midterms.
Now, obviously, politics move fast and there's going to be a lot of moving parts between now and then.
But if Mom Dani defeats Cuomo, I think that shows you that's the backlash.
That's the backlash against the Middle East involvement.
That's the backlash against really Israel, if we want to put it into basic, simple words.
And that'll see.
We'll see how much the radical left is able to turn out.
Because obviously, whoever wins on the Democrat side is your odds on favorite to be the mayor.
So I would say if Mom Dani wins tomorrow, that's your indicator.
Okay, the radical left, we just gave him the room on the Middle East.
And that's what's so unfortunate.
The left had nothing.
They had no ground to stand on.
They had no issues to run on.
They had nothing.
And we just gave it to them in the Middle East.
We just gave it to them.
So now they have that.
And they're definitely going to run with it.
They're going to run on it.
They've used it before.
They've won before with it.
So that's definitely going to happen now.
And tomorrow will be your first indicator how much impact that actually has.
So if Cuomo wins, maybe you say, okay, damage control, not so bad.
But if Bomdani gets through or has a higher percentage than Cuomo, then that's going to be your first indicator of, okay, there's going to be serious, there's going to be serious political backlash in America for the Middle East involvement.
And it would have been one thing if you would have been able to accomplish the promises before you bombed Iran and before you did a regime change war in Iran.
I think you probably could have smokescreened through it.
But the fact that you did that before we got the America first promises, that's going to be your problem.
That's going to be your problem on the right, at least.
But then just in general, we'll see what the left does as far as respond to this Middle East.
But they had no ground and now they have ground.
But again, Trump doesn't have to run again, so he doesn't necessarily have to think like that.
But it's going to be an uphill battle.
It's going to be an uphill battle for the Republicans in the midterms now, I would say.
But I think they were going for the regime change.
I think that's what they were doing all night.
The time on the ceasefire has begun, so Israel has run out of time.
I don't know if they've decided to stop bombing or not.
I don't know of a single ceasefire deal that Israel has ever kept their end of the bargain on.
Certainly not in recent memory.
I couldn't tell you one.
So we'll see.
We'll see.
That's the big challenge.
And if Netanyahu punks Trump on this, I just don't know how he continues to work with this guy.
I don't know how you can trust this guy.
I don't know why you would do any more of Israel's bidding other than to just protect the people because that's what they're doing.
They're just holding the Israeli people hostage right now.
The ones that are still there.
Reports are half a million have fled.
So the ones that are still there are just being held hostage.
They're saying, Trump, you got to help us, got to help.
He's going to bomb us.
They're going to bomb us.
They're going to kill us all.
So they're just being held hostage.
So Trump is like, okay, well, what can I do?
So that's what's going on.
But if BB crosses Trump again on this ceasefire, I just don't understand.
First of all, Trump knows he's a liar.
He's called him a liar before.
He knows he's a liar.
Everybody knows Netanyahu's a liar at this point.
So I don't know why you would trust him other than to just kind of weigh your options and look at the percentages and just say, okay, well, I'm going to take this percentage that doing this deal will save lives and we'll just go with that.
So, but I would say if Netanyahu punks Trump on this, then it's already been bad enough.
It's already been bad enough with Netanyahu and him upstaging Trump in the last couple weeks that I feel like this would be the last stand.
And, you know, maybe you get the regime change in Iran.
It'll be good for the Iranian people.
And then you need to get the regime change in Israel.
That'll be good for the Israeli people.
Because the truth is, Trump might have actually saved the Israelis from Netanyahu by stopping this war.
Now, again, here we are talking Middle East when we should be talking about domestic issues, and that's kind of the big problem.
But it is what it is.
That's where we're at.
So now Netanyahu can't extend his power without another war.
And he's going to lose his election without accomplishing, which was his greater goal, to take the Gaza Strip, defeat Hamas, expand Israel, and none of it's going to happen.
And now, if Trump ends the war, Netanyahu can't cancel the election and stay in power, and he's going to get reelected.
And you might actually have Israeli leadership that cares about the Israeli people and isn't just a psychotic, lying warmonger.
So these are all the different pieces on the board.
I'm more of the belief that Trump made a deal with Israel and Netanyahu before the election.
I think he made a deal with the Israeli lobby before the election.
And this is why he was promising on the campaign trail that Iran can't get nukes.
And let's just be clear here.
There's a big difference between Iran can't get nukes and we're bombing Iran.
Nobody said bombing Iran on the campaign trail.
So let's just put that on the record.
But aside from that, I think the deal was cut with the Israeli lobby, and they said, all right, look, here's the deal.
We'll put all our weight behind you.
We'll give you whatever amount of money you want, whatever amount of money you need, everything we've got, we'll put it behind you.
Now, strangely enough, American Jews still voted Democrat.
The majority of American Jews still voted for Harris in the last election, oddly enough.
But that's just a different, strange phenomenon.
So they gave him the money and he said, all right, my end of the deal is I will be on the campaign trail.
Iran can't get a nuke and I'll follow through on that deal.
Now, Trump promised no new wars, which, I mean, folks, let's just be real.
That deal's up.
There's a new war between Iran and Israel.
So it could have been ended today, but the 12-day war happened, as they're calling it.
So I think what Trump did in his head was he said, all right, I'll make this promise of no nukes for Iran, which is probably a red herring anyway for regime change, but whatever.
He figures I'll make that deal, but I can also promise no new wars.
So he promised these people no nukes for Iran.
And then he has to trust who's ever word is telling him whether they do or not.
And then he told his base at the campaign rallies, no new wars.
So he probably figured he could get in there, negotiate a peace deal with Iran, and not have to worry about the nuclear situation because he would negotiate a deal.
And that way he would stop another new war from happening.
So he figured he could negotiate his way and fulfill both of those promises.
Now, things obviously went sideways for whatever reason.
We got the 12-day war.
We struck Iran.
And now he's come out with, he's claiming the big ceasefire peace deal.
So we'll see what happens with that.
But they're like all in that this deal is going to be done.
I think Netanyahu probably betrayed Trump a couple times along the lines.
I think he probably was dishonest with Trump.
Well, he was certainly dishonest about the Iran nukes at some point.
And he might have been dishonest about his real agenda in Iran, which was for regime change, which Trump and his administration probably wanted nothing to do with.
But once they got in bed with Netanyahu on this deal, now Netanyahu kind of took over the narrative and took over the situation.
and now they're definitely going for regime change.
Yeah, yeah.
unidentified
I think BB, deep down, BB's still a little bloodthirsty for this.
So it's, you know, I think for BB, honestly, I think he's lost his mind.
I think if he ever had it, but I think for Bibi, this is an egomaniac, and he really thought that he could bring about the Israeli expansion because you got to understand.
And even for Trump, but once you get to that level of power, once you get to that level of power and influence, you know, you start to become more than just a deal maker.
You start to become, sounds kind of dirty, but it's just the truth.
You kind of become a hitman, you know, and you realize, hey, this powerful group over here wants to see this done.
I can get it done for them.
This group over here wants to see this done.
You know, I can come in.
I can become a legend amongst the elites.
I can get this done.
So it's not just about pleasing the voters.
You've got this entire upper echelon of elites that have their own goals, their O's and agendas that you try to make yourself a legend in those clubs too.
So I think Netanyahu really thought he could do the Israeli expansion.
I think Netanyahu really thought he could do regime change in seven different countries.
And he's about to get Iran, it looks like, after Syria, but he still can't even take the Gaza trip.
They just kill, I mean, Israel's killed like a thousand Palestinians in the last week.
Nobody's even talking about it.
So yeah, I think Netanyahu is an egomaniac, and he's probably been the biggest issue for peace in the Middle East.
Not to say without him, there would be, but he's certainly not helped.
He's certainly made it worse.
unidentified
I don't know.
I'm praying for peace, my man.
I love what you do, though.
Please, I can't wait to hear your show tomorrow live Eastern.
Aside from whoever the personalities are, you know, you have to be able to talk to one another.
You have to.
And even if you disagree vehemently, even if you can't find any common ground, just talking to somebody gives you some level of a relationship that will draw down the hatred.
You know, draw down the hatred.
I see a lot of people posting, I hate Alex Jones now.
I hate Candace Owens.
I hate, I hate, I hate.
Hey, whoa, we don't have hate in our hearts.
That's how you become evil.
We don't have when you're when you have hate in your hearts, you're blind.
So I don't have any hate in my heart.
But yeah, I mean, look, I think, I think Laura, if Laura wants to debate, I doubt, I don't know if Tucker would be interested, but yeah, Laura, Alex, whatever.
We can bring everybody together once the dust settles on all this.
And, you know, hopefully it'll settle in a good way.
But all I do is just tell the truth.
That's all I do.
I'm loyal to the truth.
I'm loyal to the country.
As I said right after Trump won, you can go back and find the post on X. I'll pull it up.
And I said, a word of advice because this is going to be really contentious to focus on the what and not the who, to decide what it is you care about, not who, and it'll make things a lot simpler.
And so obviously some people didn't take my advice, but that's all I do.
I'm here to tell the truth.
I want to be a voice in politics for decades.
I want to be here forever.
And so if I show loyalty to anything but the truth, if I stop calling things as I see them, then I'll be phased out.
And you see this every election cycle.
People come and go.
People rise.
People fall.
People become completely irrelevant.
And so for whatever reason, this has just been like a hyper speed of that process.
The media has realigned in the last two weeks in a way that usually takes two years to happen.
And it's happened in the last two weeks, probably for the good.
But, you know, that's kind of what we've experienced.
It's still too early to say for sure, but let's just take what we know right now and let's analyze it.
If the peace deal gets done, no boots on the ground, and they're able to end this war and that's it, no more U.S. involvement, then J.D. Vance will be a serious contender if he wants it.
You know, as far as who he picks for his VP, you know, people are talking about Rubio or maybe Hegset, whatever.
But clearly of the administration, you know, Vance is the guy.
So if Trump is able to get this peace deal and no boots on the ground, no Americans die, and we can kind of cool everything off here, then Vance will be viable.
If not, if things go sideways or Vance decides not to run, I think the most viable ticket, and this is going to, you know, people are going to panic and freak out and attack me for this, but, you know, whatever.
I think the most viable ticket will be Thomas Massey, Marjorie Taylor Green.
That's where I see it going.
unidentified
I was thinking Massey, I was thinking Massey and Paul.
Yeah, you know, but Rand Paul, Rand Paul, he doesn't seem to like attention.
I don't know how else to put it.
He doesn't seem to like getting in there and getting dirty and fighting the fight.
He seems to be just comfortable where he's at.
So I don't really think Rand Paul, but I don't know.
Rand Paul, you know, he's a guy that could get on the debate stage and make a little splash.
But I just don't think he has, I just don't think he has that it factor.
And I don't know if he's willing to be punchy enough on the issues like Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene are.
So I just say it like this, because here's what I see.
I just look at trends and then I do measurements.
And there's one trend that is just undeniable.
And that's people are sick of the Middle East.
And they've reached the conclusion, whether you agree or not, they've reached the conclusion that it's all because of Israel.
And so becoming against Israel, not that you hate Israel, you're anti-Israel.
It's that we're cutting off ties.
And really, you just go down the list.
You don't even have to focus on Israel, depending on how you want to message it.
It's just, we're done.
We're done with foreign aid.
We're decoupling from the Middle East.
That's going to be the winning issue in 2028.
It is.
It's going to be an issue that moves mountains politically.
It's long overdue, and it's going to come to fruition, I believe, in 2028.
I think Tulsi Gabbard will be relevant.
You know, DeSantis will probably throw his hat back in the ring.
I think ultimately, you're going to be looking at a Newsome-Cortez ticket on the Democrat side, which will be formidable.
I will tell you, don't underestimate it.
Everything you're saying in your head right now, oh, AOC is a communist.
Oh, Newsome burned California.
No, no, doesn't matter.
That'll be a formidable ticket.
And it'll all depend on what happens to the MAGA.
It'll all depends on what happens to the MAGA coalition.
unidentified
Yeah.
I think both those tickets, as bad as like Newsome or AOC would be, I mean, that's so much better than like a Jet Bush or a Ted Cruz on the right and then like a Hillary on the left.
I think you're inching closer there.
I think people are becoming like a little bit more honest and paying a little bit more attention.
We can't just be like lullabied by a bunch of boomers.
I don't know if the left could ever do it, but I think it'd be sweet if they had their own MAGA, but like a lefty version where like somehow you got some common sense lefty and they all get behind that.
It just seems like they go more radical, though.
It doesn't seem like they trend to be like, let's be populist.
Let's be like normal.
It seems like they do the opposite, but I think that'd be sick.
Well, the guy that might be it for you, you don't even know who it is, is what I'm saying.
That's what I'm trying.
I can't, I'm saying it's going to be it's going to be somebody that's not even on the map.
It's going to be somebody that's not even on the radar.
You're going to have people because here's what we've learned in politics.
And Trump kind of set the example here.
You know, it used to be everybody would get on that stage and try to stay in their lane and try to stay on the issues and just stay comfortable, right?
Like, don't do anything that's going to hurt you.
Well, that's all changed.
Now it's take shots.
Swing for the fences.
Say what nobody else will say.
That's going to be the 2028 race.
That's going to be the 2028 debates.
And then whoever makes the most home, it's like a home run derby.
Whoever hits the most home runs, that's who's going to make it through the debates.
Well, you know, here's what I've learned more about this, because so much of the originalist interpretation of the Constitution kind of gets lost.
And what I've realized is, and I do reflect on your commentary, but I'm thinking, well, what's the purpose, right?
Like, what was the intent?
Well, now that we've kind of been through this, and it's not just at the presidential level, but at all different levels, local levels, you realize now why the founding fathers did it.
Because you need to have generational Americans running the country.
That's what it's really all about.
You have to have generational Americans running the country because when non-generational Americans run the country, this is what happens.
And this is what's happening.
And I think we need to go a step further.
There should be zero dual citizens in the United States.
Zero.
Not one.
Not a single one.
If you want to be a citizen of the United States, you must renounce whatever other country you're coming from.
Full renounce.
And we need to end the send back deal that we have with Israel, whatever that deal is.
I forget what it's called.
That needs to be ended.
No more dual citizens, zero zilch nada.
If you want to be an American citizen, you renounce your other citizenship and you become an American, and that is it.
unidentified
Well, the tide is turning in your head.
I appreciate your coming around to my view on this issue.
You know, what are we going to do when BB Netanyahu breaks the ceasefire in another 24 hours?
But I think definitely there's going to be some wild stuff going on in like the 2033 time period just because they're so crazy with the 33 and 3 and the triangle stuff and all that numerology stuff and astrology stuff.
Some people think they're already on the street, you know, now, but I also wanted to hear your idea that I heard some people, I mean, your thoughts.
So some people online were saying that Trump is maybe Masonic, and that's why he's doing these deals with Israel and the Jews because they like play together, kind of like how different mafias and gangs work together.
And like, you know, he was, you know, people like Fuentes and other people online are like, you know, Donald Trump doesn't know about Jewish people.
And I think he's more in the strategy like you see with Ivanka and whatever is that you merge into it, you know, which has been a strategy for big power players ever since Alexander the Great, you know.
I don't think it's going to be, I think it's just like with still wearing the flux point, but I think it was just like how we saw with Salami when they chopped up General Salami, Solomemi or whatever, you know, that he's just doing this art of war, art of deal mix.
You know, so until I see real commitment and attacks from either side, even Israel, we don't see any ground soldier invasions, any D-Day-like attack.
It's just like ancient times, lobbing catapult projectiles, but this time it's missiles.
You know, more things change, more things stay the same.
And more so over, oh, and no one discusses this.
No one talks about it, but like humanity as a whole, we're at war with ourselves, war with the nice wars going on in our lives every day against sin, against temptation, against problems that we crave for ourselves, against problems from other people.
So naturally, that's going to be reflected in the world around us where we're going to be in a warlike state nonstop until on an individual level and as a society and humanity as a whole can get past that.
Well, the smartest man in the world, the highest IQ man in the world just said Jesus is real.
So take that for what it's worth.
But, you know, I see this all the time too in the conversations.
I thank you for the call.
Say, oh, Trump avoided all the death.
There was death.
The 12-day war most certainly had death.
It's like, what?
No, I think most, I think, I think the vast majority of people are good, but for whatever reason, getting into government power attracts bad people and then they just become worse once they get in.
So, you know, is there any government that actually reflects its people?
Is there any?
Is there any government leadership that actually serves their people?
I mean, you guys are supposed to be the platform that got him elected.
And I think he just uses us as like stepchildren.
You know, sure, thanks for your votes, but F your agenda and F what you want for the future.
That's the kind of the establishment return that I think that the alternative media has been getting, unless you're a bootlicker, right, and you're just going along with whatever's shown.
It'd be great to see if Trump's got the wavos to go on Alex's show, even though he knows that Alex is dissenting and explain his position to the American people so at least we know.
Because I don't want to, if I'm getting tricked by all this and I'm just so paranoid by the last 100 years of political happenings and Trump is actually on the level, I would prefer to know it.
You know, I could read his body language.
But if he's just going to stay in the shadows and go on Fox News and stuff, what are we supposed to do?
You know what Harrison said today that was really, really funny and true about all this bullshit is it's not about whether or not Trump went back on his promises and what most of his base is, which is anti-war.
It's that not a damn thing has been done here.
If he'd done all, it's like he did all the deportations, the Dogecuts, all of them, you know, et cetera.
And he did what he did.
I'd be like, all right, willing to look past it.
But he didn't.
And it's the fact that he can get Israel on something and their bitches in DC will do it immediately.
It's an undeniable observation that is why I think the 2028 issue will be Israel.
I think it's going to be the biggest issue.
Especially if they start trying to do these anti-Semitism bills.
They already have the anti-boycott Israel bills in 37 states if you have a state contract.
So that's already a problem.
But this influence and this control is undeniable at this point.
It's just, it's so obvious.
And, you know, Americans are sick of working 50 hours a week and being in debt.
Americans are sick of not being able to afford a home.
You know, Americans are sick of this, and we keep getting told, no, not you.
We're going to help other people first.
I mean, I mean, holy shit.
Tammy, Tammy Baldwin, or who was it?
Tammy Bruce?
Who was it that came out and said, Israel's better than America?
And I wish I was Jewish?
That's a State Department spokeswoman.
So, I mean, they don't even, they're just open about it.
They literally, they fly the Israeli flag, they wear the Israeli lapel pit.
This should be illegal.
That should be an arrestable offense.
That should be treason.
And so, I just think it's an undeniable issue.
And I just think it's the issue of 2028.
And I think the more they push back against it, the worse it's going to get and the more it's going to become the top issue.
I just think it's undeniable.
And it's a big issue on both the left and the right now.
This is an undeniable reality.
So, but to get back to the point, the fact that we get Israel first before America first is undeniable.
And this has people angry and all up in arms.
And now we see the debate.
But let's also look at it like this.
The silver lining could be, even though it pisses all of us off right now, the silver lining could be if you start delivering on tax cuts and Doge cuts and all the other America first issues right before the midterms, then you could actually save the midterms and win the midterms when you were doomed to lose.
So if there is a silver lining in dealing with this right now, that could be it.
And what's also interesting to think about with this, considering all the on X and other places, these people, MAGA is now split down the middle.
You have the shills who have now revealed themselves, and then you have people like us who have always been American first.
And frankly, it doesn't matter if it's Donald Trump or somebody else or America first.
Well, what's also interesting is that even people on the left, I mean, a lot of them are retarded and stuff, but I think an interesting thing could be.
But I think a possibility, very far chance, but possibly a sect could merge, especially with left-leaning libertarians who would agree with things we agree with and could possibly create a not a third party, but maybe some sort of just straight up because there's a lot of people pissed off about this shit.
No, if you're going to have a new party, the Democrats have to be completely destroyed and they're not quite there yet.
And that's because the Republicans don't want to do it.
The Republicans don't want to do it.
They like having the Democrats around, so they don't want to destroy them.
But that's what needs to happen.
If we're going to have an organic political evolution in this country, the Democrat Party has to be retired.
It has to go extinct.
And then the right wing is going to split on issues like Israel and deportations and foreign aid and stuff like that.
And where the real debates are happening and cultural issues and social issues.
So really, it needs to be the right.
And see, that's why I'm so upset at this MAGA coalition getting bombed over this because I don't know if it can come back.
It's not dead, but it's wounded.
It's in the middle of the intersection, you know, bleeding out.
Because we were actually on pace with the MAGA coalition as was to actually defeat the Democrats and then maybe trounce them for three, four election cycles and then have the right split off from MAGA and kind of become like a nationalist wing versus a more populist wing.
But if the MA coalition gets blown up and the Democrats gain that ground, then we're right back to Democrats, Republicans.
Don't you think it is convenient how the Democrats right now are just what you said?
They're basically in the intersection bleeding.
They're dead on arrival.
And now, when it was the perfect time to strike, now all of a sudden we have this shit where there's people that agreed two, three weeks ago, and now there's some, there's individuals on X and everywhere.
Just, if you don't like Israel, you're not American, and there's no place for you in MAGA.
Man, I just wanted to re-emphasize the, I think, you know, hopefully everything with this piece still goes well and things kind of stabilize in the Middle East, at least for now.
But I still believe that the central issue facing our country right now is without a doubt, the foreign invasion that is taking place here.
But yeah, there need to be 10 million, 20 million deportations.
unidentified
Yeah.
Absolutely.
And I would encourage you maybe to start to look into the 1965 Hart Seller Act.
I don't know if you know anything about that, but I'd encourage your listeners as well to look into that and how that has, I believe, in my personal opinion, has negatively affected our country.
And that's really all I got.
But I would love to hear you talk about it on your show if you did a little research on it.
I know I've covered it before, but as far as focusing on it as a negative, it's been more of a surface issue.
All right, folks, that's going to do it.
Hey, remember, if you're a gun fanatic, if you go shooting a lot and you spend a bunch of money, you need to become a member of the gun club at owinggunclub.com.
Become a member.
Use coupon code Owen to get a discount.
If you spend a bunch of money on ammo and firearms, folks, this thing will pay for itself within a month easily.
And that's because they have the lowest prices for club members, basically at industry rates.