The episode of Owen Troyer Live discusses the firing of Tucker Carlson from Fox News, with Owen Schroyer and his callers debating the reasons behind it and speculating on Tucker's next move. They also touch on various topics such as the J6 protests, the Ray Epps interview on 60 Minutes, the potential for a national divorce between left and right-wing Americans, and the upcoming NBA Finals. [Automatically generated summary]
I already blew the Fox News boycott because first I gave it the rating from my house that I was watching earlier tonight downstairs.
And then I gave him a second hit when I tuned in here on the in-studio.
Oh boy, that's not going to work.
When we tuned into the studio monitors, we had Fox News pulled up again.
So I blew the Fox News boycott tonight.
Apparently, conservatives now are getting better at boycotts, but I blew it, but I had to.
I had to watch.
I had to monitor it for the sake of the transmission.
So certainly, you can understand.
Ladies and gentlemen, now we are going to be taking calls all night.
I'm going to be monitoring the chats all night.
All super chats will get read tonight.
And we're going to be discussing the ouster of Tucker Carlson, the reason why we would be boycotting Fox News as if that's the reason to now boycott Fox News.
You know, there was hope.
There was hope.
And there's still some good people over there.
But they lost two of their best in Carlson and Von Gino.
There is no doubt about that.
I will be interested.
I mean, the Nielsen ratings, I guess they can get them overnight.
So they'll definitely be stories by the end of the week as far as viewership is concerned.
I don't know if Fox News would ever release their internal numbers on digital platforms.
But there's no doubt if you cut your top-rated news host, who's also considered a leader in conservative culture and politics, that you're going to suffer significantly.
Came and went, came and went like yesterday's news.
Like yesterday's news.
So we're going to be asking what you think the truth is about Tucker Carlson's firing.
And if you want to pontificate on where you think he will end up or where you'd like to see him end up, then you can do that as well.
Now, I did call it Ryan Kilmead filled in tonight for Tucker.
Although I did see Will Kane, who I like a lot.
He's one of the good ones over there at Fox News.
By the way, I missed all you guys too.
Glad to be back.
Much needed week off of de-stressing.
And by the way, well, since I bring it up, just briefly, you know, some people comment about Alex taking more time off.
And I really did need that week of de-stressing.
And so people have been talking about Alex taking more time off.
And, you know, I talked about it again today with him just because of how needed this was for me.
And I said, you know, Alex, if you need to de-stress like this, I got you.
And, you know, I don't really know how to say this because, A, it's not my story to tell.
But B, I just, it can't even be properly told by me, even now living in the moment, to be honest with you.
It's something that's going to require years of reflecting on and thinking about to really properly talk about the InfoWar story from my perspective, but let alone trying to tell Alex's.
And, you know, I'm just going to say things are tough over there, guys.
They're tough.
I'm not going to lie.
And we're still on air, and that's all that matters.
And so ultimately, at the end of the day, if we're on air, then we're winning.
And when I can encourage him to de-stress and just try to rejuvenate the life force, the goodness in the universe, then, you know, I'm going to encourage that for him.
And so it is truly an epic and crazy time.
Truly.
So it's getting weirder everywhere now, though.
And that's what we're at with the Tucker Carlson story.
So I think that there is enough information now for me to feel pretty confident on what led to Tucker Carlson's firing.
And there'll be more information to come out.
And I think, you know, the answer is obvious.
Whatever speculation or nuance you want to get into, the real answer is, why was Tucker Carlson fired from Fox News?
And the real answer is because he's a Christian conservative.
You say, well, what are you talking about?
Fox News is for Christian conservatives.
No, Fox News is a business that caters their business model to Christian conservatives.
But at the end of the day, is it really meant as a Christian conservative news network?
And while Fox News didn't fire Tucker Carlson for being a Christian conservative, because there are plenty there that would be on air, it's on air right now.
Don't have any claims to be Christian conservative.
So, no, it's not that Fox News fired him for being Christian conservative.
Is that Tucker Carlson is persecuted and headhunted by the demons of the American left and the Democrat Party because he's a Christian conservative.
And because of that persecution against Tucker Carlson, Fox News was put under the pressure cooker to get rid of him.
And I think the main reason is 2020 election coverage and Ray Epps and January 6th.
unidentified
So Tucker Carlson was fired because he was a Christian conservative.
Tucker Carlson is targeted and harassed and persecuted and attacked and lied about by the American left because he's a Christian conservative.
And so therefore, Fox News was put under the pressure cooker to fire him.
and they did.
And it's not a coincidence, like a good bowler bowling a strike.
It's not a coincidence.
I mean, maybe the Bongino thing might have been a coincidence, but the Tucker Carlson firing, the Fox News lawsuit, and AOC going on inside Gen Saki, none of that is a coincidence.
All of that is bowling a strike.
Absolutely all of it.
So the nuances of that and the details of that, I'm sure we'll find out, at least in part.
At least in part, we will find out.
But that is your basic.
That is your basic breakdown of what I believe.
And I am 99% confident in that at this point, that that is why he was fired.
And really, the Fox News execs probably didn't want to do it.
I bet Rupert Murdoch didn't even want to do it.
But if they came to him, let's just propose a hypothetical here, which could have very much been real.
If this Dominion lawsuits come, the Dominion lawsuit comes to Fox News, and they know they just saw what happened to Infowars and Alex Jones, try to get a trillion dollars.
I mean, it's absurdity.
unidentified
So they know it's like, okay, they can rig a court.
They went to Murdoch and said, look, we're going to ding you for, I mean, folks, they could have thrown out an absurd number, $100 trillion because they would have proposed it because that's what they did to Alex.
And this is a legal tactic.
And they'll just say, okay, if Dominion gets $100 million, say, for a 10-year contract, let's say Dominion gets $100 million for a 10-year contract to run U.S. elections.
Okay, well, let's say they're going to run the elections for the next 100 years.
And they would have said, okay, we sue Fox News because they could have cost us the contract to run the elections $100 billion because we were to run them for 1,000 years.
And that's what they would have done.
So could Dominion and the same Democrats running that case and the same Democrat enforcers in the federal government essentially said, hey, just get rid of Tucker Carlson.
We can settle right now.
And that'll be that.
Now, maybe there wasn't an ultimatum.
Maybe this was just the warning shot to Fox News.
Hey, you want to do business?
Hey, hey, you want to be the cable news network for the conservative media.
And Murdoch's probably sitting there thinking, well, I'll get shut down if I don't do this.
I'll lose most of my fortune fighting these people.
So I'm not going to do it.
So you can say that that's cowardly.
You can say whatever you want.
I believe that that is probably more likely the case.
I don't think there was an ultimatum, but the ultimatum is already clear in that you know Tucker Carlson is the guy who's not going to play ball.
Neither is Dan Bongino.
I don't know how many of them are left at Fox News.
I don't think Jesse Waters will play ball.
I don't think Will Kane would play ball.
And, you know, I think there's other people that just have lesser commentator roles that are good people, Lisa Booth and others that won't play ball, but that's not even the point.
The point is, Fox got the message, sent in the Dominion lawsuit.
They saw what happened to Alex Jones in InfoWars.
Murdoch didn't want to fight these people.
They took his pound of flesh.
He fired Tucker Carlson as kind of a okay.
And we're lowering our risk factor now.
And then you put on Killmead, who is like the Republican Party hatchet sculpture.
He'll always say he'll always take things at face value.
By the way, I think there is something brewing in the Democrat Party right now that is going to be a shocker.
I think there's something brewing.
And I'm kind of actually going back on a stance I took earlier, but I'm really just kind of changing course a little bit on it.
I think there is an undercurrent in the Democrat Party right now that is growing.
And I don't know if they're going to move on Biden, but they will definitely be moving after Biden.
And that is the new, there actually is a new Democrat Party forming, which is truly socialist, truly authoritarian, truly leftist, that Biden has been catering to, by the way.
If you want to know why Biden goes so far left on these issues, that's why.
Like some of this climate equity crap that he's doing.
This is the AOC, Gensaki, new wing of the Democrat Party.
And I say AOC and Gensaki because they were on that show inside Gensaki.
And I think this is their move.
And if you look at MSNBC, it mostly tries to cater to a younger audience.
Its most popular hosts, at least, look young.
I think Chris Hayes is like 50 or something, but he looks young.
They're ready to cater to the new far-left socialist Democrats.
And they're building a media and they're building a political infrastructure underneath the Democrat Party right now.
And as soon as they want to move, I don't know if they're going to move on Biden.
They might let Biden run his deal out.
But certainly, it's going to be the new thing.
It's going to be the far left like you have the mayor of Chicago.
I mean, it's just going to be just total fascists, total racists, just total authoritarians.
And it's going to be women.
It's going to be young women with 100 pounds of makeup in a suit dress or whatever, like AOC and Gensaki.
This is their move.
They don't have AOC going inside Gensaki and saying Tucker Carlson needs to be removed off the air.
And then it happens 24 hours later.
I mean, I haven't spoken to Tucker Carlson, but the news reports are that Carlson didn't even find out until we found out.
Like essentially, he found out 10 minutes before the rest of us.
But AOC goes inside Gensaki and they're calling for Tucker Carlson to be removed.
This is Gen Saki and AOC thinking that cow farts are actually killing the planet and that they're going to stop a cow fart to save the planet.
All the propaganda that they put out there about the environment, I mean, of course, they had the intended effects, but I think it's having more than the intended effect right now.
And they've now got this wing of the Democrat Party that actually thinks they're anti-establishment and is confused because they're like, Joe Biden says he's going to relieve the debt and Joe Biden says he's going to shut down all the oil and Joe Biden says that we're going to save the environment and then he doesn't do anything.
Newsmax, was that the one that didn't let people talk about the election that was stolen from Trump?
I think that was that one.
I'm actually asking.
I think that was Newsmax, though.
So that's good.
I'm glad Trump's going on with him.
He can go talk to them and then they'll steal the election from him in 2024 and they'll say, don't talk about it again.
It'll be great.
You know, I can't wait.
Can't wait.
and watch the whole thing.
It was Newsmax.
Yes.
Thank you, Jedi born.
So, good.
I see somebody in the comments here trashing Rush Limbaugh, floored patriot.
And, you know, I can certainly understand it.
I can certainly understand it.
I understand what you're saying.
In fact, I used to hold a similar, if not exact same view of Rush Limbaugh.
But I can tell you through my wisdom in media and just in life over the years that that is the wrong point of view.
Not that Rush Limbaugh was great, like the best leader of all time or anything like that.
But no, what he did as a broadcaster and what he did as a cultural icon is certainly worthy of respect, whether you agreed with his politics or not.
But even as his approach that you might not have liked because you say he kept the sheep complacent, which again, I understand where you're coming from there, and there's probably an element of truth to that.
But Rush's vision was different than yours.
And what his vision and what his words have done to shape the media landscape we're in now would never have been possible if he took the approach that you wish he had taken.
So if it wasn't for Rush Limbaugh, there would be no Alex Jones.
If it wasn't for Alex Jones, there would be no Owen Schroer.
If it wasn't for Owen Schroyer, there would be no name the next one in line.
So I understand why you're saying that.
But no, Rush Limbaugh was absolutely not the mockingbird media.
While I understand, you can see it that way, but when you look at the effect Rush Limbaugh has had, there is no way, there is no way the CIA or anybody else wanted that to happen.
So I don't buy that, but I understand that viewpoint because I've had it before.
But at this point, I believe I was wrong.
So we can start taking your calls now.
But yeah, that's funny.
Bone's mama points out how she used to think Alex Jones was this or that or the other thing.
And now she's changed her mind.
And that's fine.
That's, you know, it's good.
It's good.
You live and you learn.
Trying to see what else.
You know, it's just I'm trying to see what the actual Mockingbird press is talking about.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, guys, guys, you'll never guess.
You'll never guess what CNN is talking about tonight.
As I said, we are going to open up the phone lines.
But man, I'll tell you, we got the people.
This just happens in talk radio.
A little behind the scenes stuff for you.
The most loyal listeners and the most loyal callers, they call before the phone line is even open.
It's true.
And they are calling right now.
So I will be opening up the phone line here shortly.
But first, ladies and gentlemen, Owen Troy are live always brought to you by wolfpack.gold as everything I say comes to you through the wolfpack.gold microphone.
Are you a member of the pack yet?
If not, what are you waiting for?
Our numbers are growing.
The pack is getting stronger.
And this gives you more buying power in the precious metals market.
Because when you want to go out and purchase some gold, some silver to diversify your wealth, well, you're buying as an individual.
But when you're a member of the pack, you get to buy with the pack.
And that gives us all kinds of leverage and much better price points.
So wolfpack.gold, become a member of the pack.
I'm telling you, you won't regret it.
And you get exclusive offers when we get a large purchase of gold or silver or something like that.
It's usually some nice rare gold pieces.
And we purchase even more.
That means we have an excess.
We get exclusive rights to these excess precious metals that we have.
And you get to purchase them at a much lower price, much lower than the public market.
I'm telling you, it's awesome.
Join the pack, wolfpack.gold.
All right.
Now we can give out the phone number, if I can remember it.
Actually, there's a secret.
Let's see if I remembered it.
There's a secret to it.
There's a reason why the number is what it is.
But yes, I did remember it despite being off for two weeks.
Memory has not failed me.
But if you're trying to get in, the line is getting harder and harder to get through to because we get more and more callers now.
So, and you get the regulars that call in non-stop.
Where do you think he's going to end up or where would you like him to end up?
I didn't really provide any opinion on that, and I don't really have one, but I guess I'll just throw one out there for the fun of it since I'm going to be asking you.
I think most likely Tucker Carlson does something independent.
I'd like to say Rumble.
Rumble would be my leader in the clubhouse right now if he was going to commit to any platform.
But I just think he's going to go independent.
He's going to do something independent.
And he's going to look for a lucrative deal where he doesn't have to worry about sales or anything like that.
And he can just do whatever he wants and not have to promote anything.
So it'll probably be about a month, but I'll tell you that here, a little insider information.
Tucker is pulling producers from Fox News.
So that means that he is planning on doing something because he wouldn't be asking them for that commitment if he wasn't planning on doing something and planning on making sure they're taken care of.
Now, the problem is his audience will probably get cut into like a fourth of what it was.
But that's fine.
And that'll be a lesson learned.
And it'll be another lesson in censorship that people have to learn.
And that's okay.
But Tucker Carlson, I think, will be better than ever.
I will say this.
I think Tucker is going to come out with a lot of opinions that's actually going to anger some conservatives.
But that's okay.
This is the reshaping of the American media.
And if we can save this country, we're going to have a much better media when it comes to integrity and honesty than we certainly have now, but than we've had in a long, long time.
So let's take our first caller on the phone lines.
What's your name and where are you from?
By the way, it's line to line.
So if you're calling in, I just answer your call right on the air and I ask what your name is and where you're from.
So first caller, what's your name, where are you from?
Your name is hello, Anyung.
What's up, Casey?
No, I don't.
What did you get this month?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
There might have been, I think there was a delay in the shipments this month because, I mean, honestly, the whole thing is growing a lot larger than originally anticipated.
so it's all good news.
It was good because I didn't really do much vacationing, but I didn't look at much news.
I just totally broke from, you know, the info war.
I basically took a furlough.
And so that was nice.
But I didn't make it to a beach or anything like that, unfortunately.
I did play some pretty good golf.
Now you understand you have not answered the question of why you think Tucker Carlson was fired and where you think he'll end up.
yeah that he he should go on infowars do you think if tucker carlson went on infowars it'd break the internet It could.
I bailed you out tonight because you were very kind and I appreciate that.
And you and Sandra are very nice.
But the compliments clouded my vision because I was supposed to be getting an answer to the question, but I bailed you out because we did have an audio issue, but I fixed the audio issue.
So nobody heard your compliments to me.
And they all assumed that you answered the question eloquently and clairvoyantly and masterfully.
And so for that, now they believe you are a genius, but I didn't have any of it on the air.
So for that, they think I'm stupid.
But I know what the problem was.
That's why I was able to fix it immediately.
So the phone line, though, is back open for our next caller.
All right.
The compliment.
If you want to say a compliment, I'll accept it.
I'm not going to tell you not to compliment me.
That's very kind.
But I do want to know why you think Tucker Carlson was fired and where you think or you would like to see him end up next.
I'm telling you, we and if you're kind of a more leaner guy or a thinner guy like I am, it really does, even, you know, high metabolism, it really does still last like eight to ten hours.
unidentified
Yeah, man.
Yeah, I'm still shaking a little, but I just, I wanted to say it's great to have you back.
And I've been dealing with this Twitter fallout, and I'm seeing Elon's true colors now on Twitter.
And that last bit segment you're doing on the war room was so accurate.
Well, that's not really Elon's fault, but he did say something about two hours ago how he's still trying to fix Twitter.
It's not perfect.
He's still making mistakes.
Now, look, it comes down to this.
If one person's speech is being censored, then everybody's speech is being censored.
And if one person's speech is being censored illegitimately, then there is no free speech.
And so that's the issue.
And, you know, Alex, last two weeks ago, you may remember Alex had this rant about how he's sick of people playing games and having fun in the patty cake time.
Like, Alex played the clip of AOC and Jen Saki like five times on Sunday.
And then Monday, we get this news.
Like, they are mocking us at this point.
It is like showing in our face.
We can take down whoever it is, and you can't do anything about it.
And let me just say this: the same thing happened to Alex.
When Alex got kicked off of YouTube, he lost so many viewers who are unwilling and too stupid to follow him to Infowars.
The same thing is going to happen with Tucker, and it's going to be even worse because they're just going to replace him with a talking head they know they can control.
They got their feel like they're the long you-know-what of the law, and they are ready to F you with it.
unidentified
Totally, man.
Um, I just want to say one last thing.
I was on Mushrooms two days ago, and everything that Alice was talking about about how human consciousness is a comet and InfoWars is at the tip of the spear.
I saw all of that.
It's all so real, and there's nothing more real than it.
So, everyone that's tuning into this, this is a real spiritual war, and it's going to turn into a physical one soon.
But it's our responsibility to stay non-violent and to not fall to any false flag they try to put on us.
I'm buying more products just so I can help you guys because I want to support you guys.
I'm part of that 1% that buys, and I keep buying because I just, I'm not rich or anything.
I'm actually kind of middle, low class, but I have enough money for a savings to keep dropping and keep buying products to at least do my part to keep you guys on the air to fight for our freedoms.
You guys are fighting for our freedoms, man.
Who cares about that newest phone or the newest iPhone or Galaxy?
Who cares about that stupid car that you want to get?
Like, how about we support people who are fighting for us and fighting on the front lines?
That's what you guys are doing.
You guys are frontline warriors, not keyboard warriors.
You guys are frontline warriors.
And I appreciate you, Owen, and everybody else.
But I can't wait to see you take the number one spot, man, because that's what you deserve.
But, you know, you bring up something that I was thinking about discussing today already because I briefly talked about this earlier and I did a segment on this on the war room today.
And that's basically this whole internet activism thing or this whole and I'm not saying people are bad.
It's a dopamine factor.
It's a natural element of humanity and human psychology, but it's this internet activism and this thinking that a victory for you on the internet is somehow a victory in the culture war or the political war that you claim to be a warrior in.
And since we already were talking about Rush Limbaugh, and then because this is something Rush Limbaugh talked about too, why aren't I playing in the NBA?
Or why aren't I playing in the NHL?
Why is that not Owen Schroer out there on the ice in the NHL playoffs?
Why am I not an NHL hockey player?
Because I'm no good.
Because I'm not good at hockey.
I can't play hockey good.
So nobody wants to watch me play hockey.
Nobody is going to watch me or pay to see me play hockey.
So I'm not a professional hockey player.
Now, I can go and buy a pair of ice skates and I can buy a pair of hockey gloves and a stick and a puck and a net.
And I can go out and skate around and shoot a puck into the net and say, look, I'm playing hockey, but that doesn't make me a hockey player.
And so Rush Limbaugh warned about for years what the internet age is going to do to the media and how it's going to provide a platform for people who shouldn't have a platform.
Because we're not talking about hockey or basketball when it would be overtly obvious that I don't belong out there.
It's virtually indifferent because everybody now has to start from the bottom.
And when everything becomes watered down, you start at the bottom no matter what, consumer or creator.
And so there are a bunch of players on the ice that aren't hockey players.
If you catch my drift, but they have huge followings and huge audiences.
And I've discussed before how this we go through a routine about every two years or so of a media resurfacing, relandscaping, purge, purification.
You're going through it all right now, just like I told you.
But you're always going to see that.
But it's a lot worse now because it's like steroids in a weightlifting competition.
You can fake whatever you want on the internet to get followers and to get a platform and to pretend you're informed.
And now that is basically what goes on every day.
But the difference is when you have the talent to be an NHL hockey player, that gives you the platform to play hockey.
You earned that platform.
But nowadays, you don't have to earn the platform.
And you don't necessarily appreciate the platform.
Or if you're the consumer, you don't recognize that the platform that you are consuming is fraudulent.
But that's basically what goes on on the internet every day.
And actually, I find it extremely entertaining, to be honest.
People are pointing out Dylan Mulvaney might be a perfect example.
Might be a perfect example.
So with that, we will take another phone call.
But no.
Don't be too concerned about the insanity in the independent media today.
Just be smart.
And I would say just be entertained by it.
Because quite frankly, I find it hilarious.
Like you've got conservative women arguing about what it means to be conservative or a trad wife on the internet and like doing this like internet fighting with each other.
I think it's hilarious.
And actually, I think it's great because people like that crap.
And it's not all controlled by leftist liberals anymore.
So people like drama.
People like catfighting.
It's like reality TV.
So Republican women posting pictures of themselves at the beach and then arguing about what it means to be a conservative.
I find it hilarious.
And I say, go for it.
Don't stop.
I don't even think it's a bad thing.
I kind of go back and forth between is it a good thing and a bad thing?
It's bizarre you say that, man, because it was great a few weeks ago when you were coming for the big man.
My dad actually got through Rick from Arizona and he goes to Clown World and tooted the horn that I sent out to him, too.
But you really already hit it with Sandy Cortez being with Jen Suckey yesterday and saying, Tucker by name, and less than 24 hours, sure as shit, he's gone.
Coincidence, I think not, man.
Yeah, and nothing more than Clown World stage political seeker.
And I really was a normie or as normie as I could possibly be.
In fact, I'm still kind of clinging to it even as I'm sitting here.
And yes, I am monitoring the news, but I've actually got one of my monitors on the hockey game.
So I'm just clinging to being a normie.
I wonder if there's, I can't, I just, I don't want to look at the news.
I just, it was just so nice not to look at it.
And I've been doing it all day already.
I'm burnt out on it.
I think I'm going to, I think I'm going to go double on the hockey game.
I can't, I just, I'm just sick of it.
I, they're so predictable.
It's just, it's just so predictable.
You know?
I mean, how much can you take?
I take way too much.
Ooh, actually, I have a gift.
I have a, I have a, I have an admission, actually.
And this was part of being a normie here.
See, I'm clinging to it, guys.
I've even got an NBA game on.
I'm sick.
I'm an infected normie now.
I've got a serious problem here.
It's all right.
Just give me, I'll be fine.
I'm like 10% normie right now.
I don't know.
It's kind of making me sick, actually.
But I do have a confession to make.
And obviously, I'm not really a fan of LeBron James with the amount of anti-American, pro-communist slave labor camps comments and commitments he's made.
But I do have to come clean about something that I'm kind of rooting for LeBron James to win the title this year.
I'm going to be honest.
Only because it's like a generational thing where you've got all these young kids that think they're watching like the latest and greatest player that's playing in the NBA today.
And I'm just like, hey, LeBron is a communist asshole, but he's better than anything you got today as far as basketball is concerned.
So why don't you, why don't you just calm down?
So it's kind of like, you know, with Jordan people.
I mean, I saw the back end of Jordan, but I was really too young to watch Jordan win championship after championship.
But, you know, you know that, you know, like the NBA, like Jordan will always be the best.
That generation will always be the best.
And I like that.
I would probably agree with that.
But it's like all, whenever I'm playing ball with these kids, it's like they're all about this guy's better and this guy's that.
And, you know, LeBron's trying to just like, no.
So I'm kind of, I'm actually kind of rooting for LeBron to win it again.
I'm not going to lie.
I kind of want him to win it this year just because I'm sick of all these young kids thinking they're watching the best basketball players ever who are nothing compared to Jordan or even LeBron.
So it's just kind of a little generational thing.
You know, I'm getting old now.
Basically an old graybeard now.
And I'm still clinging to that.
I'm still clinging to that normie that was just in me for a week.
Like, you know, a lot of people would, I don't know how to phrase this the best, but let's say it like this: a lot of people would help Tucker Carlson because they wanted him to cover something or they wanted him to break a news story or have information.
They didn't want to do it themselves, but they'd say, Tucker, here, I got this for you, or here's this person.
What's interesting about that, they might not have been running ads during Tucker Carlson because I know there was some sort of dispute with advertisers not wanting to market in Tucker Carlson.
And they basically resolved the issue by only running certain commercials during Tucker Carlson, like Mike Lindell and others.
So the answer actually might have been both.
It might have been that Big Pharma did market.
I mean, I know Big Pharma markets on Fox News.
I've seen it, but they might not have been on Tucker Carlson.
You know, I want to warn you guys about something real quick.
I just want to give you guys a fair warning about something real quick because I'm a big movie goer and eventually I want to get into movie reviews again.
I know I will someday, probably right here on this channel.
I got the whole thing planned out, but I need to warn you guys about two movies real quick.
One, the remake of the Power Rangers.
Two out of ten, one out of five.
It's going to be a no-go for me.
And then the new movie that just came out, the Adam Driver movie 65, total letdown.
I mean, my goodness, talk about a weak performance.
A one out of 10?
A one?
A one out of five?
One out of ten?
That's the because I want to, I usually do them out of five, but maybe out of ten will give it a little better understanding for the consumer instead of out of five.
But just do not waste your time on Power Rangers or on 65.
No, but what's odd is what's strange is because I remember in talk radio, people used to do this all the time, is they would call and they'd have their radio on in the background, but they would still be on the phone.
But did you think you were going to talk to me through the computer?
No, no, I uh I actually responded to you when you oh, oh, okay, because the caller earlier, it sounded like the caller earlier was like trying to talk to me through the computer, and I was like, wait a second, where is the confusion here?
And they got, and they got, I mean, they got the whole alignment that they need.
If they get Georgia, which means Atlanta, if they get Michigan, which means Detroit, if they get Pennsylvania, which means Philadelphia, if they get Wisconsin, which means Milwaukee, then there is no path to victory for the Republican Party.
You'll just be like sort of like the last election or whatever.
But so I guess, you know, what I've been kind of thinking about is, am I going to, I mean, are we going to be faced with, you know, to buy or sell, you know, you have to take that mark because I think, I don't know, do you know a lot about that?
Because I hear that if you deny Jesus Christ, they will kill you.
Well, like when the mark of the beast comes around, you know, and they're going to say that if you want to, You know, but if you want to buy food to survive, that you will have to take the mark.
And if you say no, then you know, you're gonna, they're gonna be put to death.
And that the people that are put to death are martyrs, and they will still, you know, well, look, look, here that's that's like where this would all go.
I mean, the plan is to have a world government system.
They want it based on a carbon credit.
And you can't get into the digital currency until you enroll in your human app that tracks your carbon and everything else.
And you won't get access to whatever the currency is unless you've had all your updated immunizations and everything else.
And that's the system of total control they want to have set up.
Now, the prophecy of the Bible just simply takes the basic concept of tyranny against humanity on planet Earth and lays out what that would look like.
And so it's really an exponentially sophisticated document that can be so widespread in its interpretation and understanding and yet be accurate no matter how the situation plays out.
So, yeah, I don't know.
They might start killing you if you don't take a vaccine or they might start just killing you if you go into a Christian church underground or something.
They're not going to come out and say that and make that the law, but that's where this tyranny goes.
I've met some of his crew and producers and have talked to them before.
But Alex's phone was actually broke today.
He really did not have his phone today.
So I have not talked to Alex.
I don't know if he's talked to Tucker Carlson since then.
What I've said is all the information I have, which is essentially all the information that's public, except that Tucker is picking off producers from Fox News.
I believe at least two.
So I don't think that would be going on unless Tucker Carlson already had a plan to do something in the near future.
unidentified
I mean, I'm sure he does.
I mean, as far as mainstream journalism goes, he is, I mean, he stands alone, really.
So it's more, I suppose, it's more of a question of how did he sort of scrape along this far, kind of teetering on the edge of what was and wasn't acceptable.
As I say, the way I look at it, he's kind of like the gateway drug.
You've been introduced to his way of looking at things, which and I didn't need introduced to, I was already long since there, but a lot of people who wouldn't otherwise get this kind of access, which is the real shame of it now that he's gone.
I mean, as I say, speaking from someone over here in the UK, our media is absolutely dreadful.
our culture is actually way is i think some people the last time i harrison harrison smith talked to someone from my neck uh they he he i was trying to give him a pet book saying because the person from britain was was telling that harrison he's basically given up in this country is beyond saving and harrison would tell him look if you if you have that attitude then yeah it will be beyond saving you can't give up but you need to understand how far ahead europe is or far behind europe is however you can say it there really is no hope for us um there is no debate
whatsoever on issues like for instance climate change i mean it's completely i don't even i myself that was one of the that was one of the last things i i changed my mind on as soon as i looked at it as soon as i looked at it objectively and thought hold on apart from the fact that the science is completely obviously it's there is no basis for it there is we don't even have the capacity to make long-term weather predictions we don't have the computing power it's just if you have you ever heard of the phrase that the um the the something with the
flapping of a butterfly's wings of a flapping of butterflies wings in one continent can end up starting a tornado in another that's but it's both like a metaphor for uh like unknown complexity but it's it's actually a real actual problem with weather predictions the number of the amount of information that goes into long term where we don't have the computational power there's no way they can have any kind of projections that go decades into the future with any accuracy no whatsoever but that wasn't that wasn't what she's reminded it was
it's it's something whenever there's gigantic political consensus everyone across the spectrum in the political class celebrities and whatnot agreeing and endorsing something you know it's corrupt that they did the same with the same with the wars it's the same with with this it's a money-making scheme to scam now i know that's more than obvious to you guys and that there's a healthy debate over america at least there's a strong there's a strong and grow and push back against it over here it's completely it's not it's off the table completely off the table we are decommissioning all our power plants we don't have any fossil
fuels there's outrage over the fact that we're going back to burning gas or or opening up a possible new gas what's like a single uh gas power supply we don't have any of our own energy we've got we've got there are centuries worth of coal but we have no coal mines we have no capacity to get it where we are the level of inflation has been at 12 13 14
for like at least eight 12 months now and it's not going to go down we're well committed to the sanctions i mean there's just no one i'm sorry if i'm going on a bit here well you know it's crazy i'm listening to you here and it's like imagine if a superiorly intelligent alien life form came down to planet earth and they wanted to call it of its apex species which is the human being but they wanted to be able to do that without actually
destroying the planet and then ruining the entire purpose well what would what would their ultimate goal be what would the perfect what would the perfect plan be to convince humans that they're evil and they need to kill themselves and and that's what they're doing that's really what the climate change argument is it's definitely a strong element of it i mean alex said something the other day on there that made me think uh he talked about it being a silicon revolution against carbon where the carbon-based life forms
unidentified
the future especially with artificial intelligence which i know was a big reason why you guys were kind of iffy or or suspicious about elon musk because his push for artificial intelligence artificial intelligence and silicon future or as you said an alien or whatever it may be uses the carbon-based life form by us and that the as you said the apex predator or whatever the apex life form if you will carbon-based life form on this planet The carbon and everything that comes from it is evil and we're evil.
And we have to sort of off the night and go off gently into that good night rather than sort of accept our faith.
But you just hit on something there about, oh, well, people just do it for the money.
And that's definitely accurate.
But to get a better understanding of this, we have to look at it not from a standpoint of greed, like they want money or they want to be rich.
Really, it comes from a standpoint of lack of self-confidence and survival instinct.
These, we still, we live in a concrete jungle or we live in a jungle.
And so it's still survival of the fittest, no matter what we think, or no matter how easy it is to be fit.
It's still survival of the fittest.
So they have these extremely weak survival instincts, which means they have strong survival instincts because they're weak people.
And so they get into any position at all where they can essentially afford to live or have a job or have a roof over their head or maybe they are greedy and they like having 10 mansions or a boat, then they're just never going to let it go.
And to them, whether it's conscious or subconscious, it's just their survival instinct.
They don't believe they can survive in this world.
So if they can find their way to survive in this world, they're going to take it, even if it means selling out their very goodwill, humanity, fellow humans, integrity, whatever.
They don't look at it that way.
It's a survival thing.
It might not be a greed thing as much as it is a survival thing because they're weak, weak members of our species.
unidentified
That's my way.
That's an interesting way of looking at it.
That's not how I, to me, that sounds like you're making excuses for them.
You're saying, oh, they're already fine on their basic human survival instincts, and they don't have the strength that we have to overcome it and be moral.
So, you know, there's not much we can do for them.
And so it's almost, you're not pitying them, so to speak, but it's like, that to me sounds like you're making excuses for them.
You know, like we, we could, couldn't we, couldn't we all sell out?
Couldn't we all like sacrifice our morals or couldn't, sorry, couldn't we all say to ourselves, oh, I need to survive in this world.
I mean, it must have been nice for the older generation now to live back in the day and not have to deal with what us younger kids do have to do with too.
Because at the end of the day, it is really crappy, too.
I mean, there were definitely times in high school where I could tell you more about what was happening in the sports world than what was going on in my own, you know, classroom.
So, you know, I uh, and part of my reflection over my break, I thought about these transmissions and where I want to go with them and what you guys like too.
And I've kind of came to the conclusion that you guys prefer these ones to be a little less structured, a little more laid back.
Because you got to understand, I'm a trained professional.
And so when I look at airtime, I'm thinking about I'm having to fill that airtime.
But I realize that a lot of the streaming marketplace is really just go on air and interact with the audience.
I honestly think that Tucker was going to say, screw you.
I'm putting out the rest of the J6 stuff that you didn't let me put out last time when he was going to keep pushing all the information out and start airing some of the videos.
And I think seeing the Ray Epps bullshit last night, Tucker said, well, screw you.
So if that is the case, then that certainly changes things overall.
Because, well, they would have had to either have prior knowledge that he was going to do that, like as in last week, or somehow they found out today and then made that decision.
Unless he had to go ahead of time to the producers and say, look, this is what we're putting together.
Someone in his staff or just someone at Fox got wind of it and said, no, we're going to put the kibosh to that.
I mean, you'd almost have to assume, too, going into the weekend, knowing that Ray Epps is going to be featured on 60 Minutes, that if Tucker's not going to make it his primary thing that he's going to talk about on Monday, it's going to be something that he's going to talk about on Monday.
So, I mean, maybe the Fox executives had an idea that, well, this is a possibility.
And then they started asking around and found out, yeah, this is what he wants to do.
Well, and you know, just since we're, you know, weighing all the potentials here, because a lot of times media will do this intentionally too.
And, you know, you had Bongino, you had Carlson, and you had Lemon all lose their TV shows kind of at the exact same time.
Sometimes that stuff is coordinated intentionally, whether that's just because they had a meeting and made a decision, or they want to kind of soften the blow.
It's like the more get released at once, the less of a story it is, especially with somebody as big as Tucker Carlson.
And even Dan Bongino in that matter.
I mean, heck, even Don Lemon's been on CNN for, you know, a decent period of time and has a media footprint.
So, but yeah, I've been, I've been anticipating a big media shakeup for a while.
I've been talking about it.
And so I'm not surprised by this.
And the process is certainly not finished yet.
All right, let's take one more call before I sign off.
Final caller for the night.
What's your name?
Where are you from?
unidentified
Owen, my name is Patrick.
I am from South Carolina.
How are you doing tonight?
What's up, Patrick?
Hello, Missouri man.
Now, are you a Kansas City Chiefs fan or a St. Louis Rams fan, old school?
Well, obviously, I grew up a St. Louis Rams fan and loved going to the Rams games as a kid.
Once I got into sports media and I would work the NFL games, whether it was CBS or Fox in town, you kind of lose the, it's harder to be a fan at that point.
And then once the Rams left town, like I completely lost any loyalties to teams in the NFL.
I still kind of have a soft spot in my heart for the St. Louis Cardinals and the St. Louis Blues.
Other than that, I just like watching, I just like watching the live sports.
I don't really have any loyalties unless I'm gambling, which I'm not.
unidentified
Yeah, probably a smart call there.
Well, I wanted to start off by saying how much I really appreciate what you do.
Your show, you're very informational, very informative, but you also incorporate comedy into your show.
And it's just, that's very tough to do.
And I have a lot of appreciation for it and very entertaining.
Well, I've got to be somewhat entertaining because if not, you're not going to tune in.
But I'm glad I can at least make you laugh once a day.
unidentified
Yeah, well, you definitely do that.
The question that I have for you is going a little bit off topic on what we've been discussing tonight, but I think is a topic that we're going to encounter more and more as the nation becomes more and more divided, as the dollar becomes more devalued over time, is the topic of national divorce.
I've been doing some reading in particular from the Mises Institute, Brian McMacon, Jeff Deist, and Tom Woods.
They write a lot on the topics of secession and radical decentralization.
And I just want to know what are your thoughts on the topic?
Well, I think it's, you know, since we use the term divorce, let's make the obvious metaphor here to marriage, where, you know, I think divorce is not so rare these days, obviously.
When you think about divorce and a marriage, there comes a point in time where the two in the relationship are starting to go their separate ways or can't get along.
And maybe the idea is starting to creep into their heads, but they're not going to say it.
They're not going to say divorce, right?
But maybe the idea, then maybe they're both kind of talking about how it's not working out, but they're not going to say the D-word.
Oh, we're not saying divorce.
But then eventually it always comes out.
It always comes out.
So I kind of think that that's where it's at right now.
Where, I mean, call it a divorce, call it secession, separation, you know, whatever.
It's a conversation at this point that is just inevitable.
I mean, the right wing and the left wing in America are so diametrically opposed to one another in their worldview, in their policy, in their culture.
I mean, it's just, it's unsustainable.
It truly is unsustainable.
And the idea of live and let live no longer exists in the soul of the American left.
It's not there.
It's live their way or die.
And so the social contract has been broken.
And so the D word divorce is just inevitable.
And I don't know.
I don't know what happens.
Either the American left comes into its right mind.
I don't see that happening.
Or it eventually just completely collapses in on itself and disappears as other political parties and movements have in America before.
But we're dealing with a gigantic megalodon behind that known as the World Economic Forum Great Reset that's waiting to chomp us up and eat us up when the cancer that is the left kills the body politic.
So it's an inevitable conversation.
It's an inevitable circumstance.
There's even going to be states and cities and districts and regions that vote to secede from the states they're in or secede from the union even.
There's a big movement in Texas right now, the Texit, that's gaining some serious steam.
So you're definitely going to see the signs and symptoms of a national divorce.
Whether it gets to that point or not, I'm not sure.
But you can't have a real conversation about a national divorce because the left needs the right.
Without the right, the left has nobody to boss around.
Without the American right, the left has nobody to take their guns and propagandize their children and make stop driving cars or use gas ovens or work in the coal mines or anything like that.
So you'll never be able to have an amicable split with these people.
So really, it's impossible.
Secession is the only option.
Divorce is not an option.
These people can't be divorced from.
They're authoritarians.
unidentified
they're tyrants so i couldn't agree more the The idea of us peacefully separating these people are not live and let live.