Wednesday War Room: Trump Confronts ‘New World Order’ at Davos, Tells Globalist WEF America Is Back! Says Prosecutions Coming Over Rigged 2020 Election!
Donald Trump and allies at Davos’s WEF reject globalization, vowing prosecutions for the "rigged 2020 election" while exposing undercover claims of geoengineering—like military-backed aerosol injections—and CBDCs undermining financial freedom. James O’Keefe’s footage reveals alleged globalist control via AI-healthcare projects (e.g., Google’s Project Nightingale) and programmable money, despite Dutch public opposition. Dr. Charles Cornish-Dale (Raw Egg Nationalist) ties systemic fraud, immigration-driven cultural shifts, and testosterone decline—linked to chemicals like atrazine—to liberalism’s erosion of Western strength, arguing education and male role models are critical for resistance. Greenland’s Arctic bases, rare minerals (cobalt, lithium), and geothermal potential emerge as strategic priorities, contrasting U.S. weakness with Russia’s 50+ Arctic facilities. The episode frames these issues as interconnected battles against globalist manipulation, from election fraud to biological and narrative subversion, urging defiance through voter accountability and traditional values. [Automatically generated summary]
I mean, when I think about Stephen Miller and his white supremacist rhetoric, it reminds me, yes, it reminds me of the way the Nazis described Jewish people.
These people are just idiots.
I really, you know, I'm at the point where it's become really hard to have an intellectual debate with any of these people because the level of stupidity that they are displaying every single day is frankly embarrassing.
The idea that this is a white nation that needs to be preserved is a fascinatingly disgusting view.
He's always been a racist, a bigot, a xenophobic.
The one place where we thought we would never experience this is the U.S. goddamn states.
Washington Attorney General Nick Brown has labeled it potential harassment that could lead to hate crime reports, emphasizing that unsubstantiated accusations and door knocking disrupts providers and families.
A lot of this is generated by the president and Elon Musk tweeting out unverified reports in Minnesota, and that quickly, you know, threw a storm across the nation.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, Infowars.com banned.video.
Very big show we have for you today.
Raw Egg Nationalists will be joining me in the second hour, and then we'll take your calls, you and I together, in the third hour.
We have a lot of stories to cover, of course.
Tons of videos out of the World Economic Forum as Donald Trump swoops in and lets them all know who's boss.
We love seeing it.
Lots of big updates of this in terms of Greenland and NATO and the rise of digital ID and all of the other various and nefarious programs that they're foisting on us, imposing on us, whether we like it or not.
So we'll get into all of that and, of course, health as well with the good doctor.
But let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
Your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 21st of January, 2026.
Trump says he reached Greenland deal framework with NATO and backs off Europe tariffs.
President Donald Trump said that he and NATO Secretary General Mark Root have formed the framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland.
Trump said that as a result of the negotiations, he would no longer impose punitive tariffs on a slew of European countries that were set to begin February 1st.
Stocks shot up immediately after Trump posted the update.
In an interview with CBC's Joe Kernan, minutes after posting the statement, Trump described the Greenland framework as the concept of a deal.
So it looks like we may be moving more in that direction.
Again, Greenland continues to be a major topic of conversation at the World Economic Forum.
Still just bizarre to me, but we'll report on it.
I think it has almost everything to do with AI.
I think they just want to make Greenland into a giant AI hub because it has so many natural resources and it's so cold up there that you can run server farms for super cheap.
I just think the AI companies are trying to colonize Greenland for their own right.
Meanwhile, Trump says people who will be prosecuted for their role in the 2020 election.
U.S. President Donald Trump said in Davos on Wednesday the people will be prosecuted for what they did in the 2020 election, which he again falsely claimed was rigged, which of course it was rigged.
And I'm glad to see the people might actually be held to account for it.
I swear, if I could have a nickel for every headline that said something about the Trump administration threatening or will do, I mean, you know, if promises were money, we'd be the Federal Reserve.
But as it stands, we got a lot of nothing being promised to us.
Meanwhile, Americans brace for another snowstorm as ice threatens southern states.
With many Americans still recovering from multiple blasts of snow and unrelenting freezing temperatures in the nation's northern tier, a new storm is set to emerge this weekend that could coat roads, trees, and power lines with devastating ice across a wide expanse of the South.
The storm arriving late this week and into the weekend is shaping up to be a widespread, potentially catastrophic event from Texas to the Carolinas, said Ryan Mao, a former chief scientist of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, saying, I don't know how people are going to deal with it.
And in the same category as that, we'll show you a video of James O'Keefe undercover at Davos, getting the elite to admit they've been spraying things into our air forever.
Meanwhile, fury as Amazon ring cameras are hooked up to ICE systems.
As U.S. customs and enforcement agents wreak havoc on American communities, big tech companies have been making themselves indispensable to the increasingly tyrannical state.
Among them is Amazon subsidiary Ring, the company behind those AI doorbell cameras that have exploded in popularity over the last few years.
Back in October, Ring announced that its devices would soon be looped into a network of flock AI surveillance cameras.
That network, an investigation by 404 media found, has been available to local and federal police enforcement agencies like ICE, leaving many worried that their ring doorbell cams are now feeding into a government panopticon, which, yes, of course they are and have for years.
The fact that it's being used by ICE now means that for once it might actually be used to catch criminals.
That'd actually be a positive development.
But of course, it's the irony of the situation that we're in.
We have to deport these criminals.
We have to deport the illegal aliens.
We have to empower ICE to do it.
Unfortunately, instead of cooperating with us, instead of just allowing us to enforce basic national law, the left is instead attacking them and lying about them and framing the whole thing as if it's tyrannical.
And so it's actually giving them all the excuse they need to actually do all of the things that are tyrannical, even though it's going to be used against average Americans, regular citizens later.
It's unfortunate because it is 100% the fault of the left putting us in this position.
Finally, Australia has passed their new hate speech law.
Australia's federal parliament has enacted a broad new legal package targeting hate, anti-Semitism, and extremism, passing the Combating Anti-Semitism, Hate, and Extremism Criminal and Migration Laws Bill 2026 with strong majorities in both chambers.
The bill has several implications regarding free speech.
Yes, folks, the rule of law and free speech itself is now officially dead in Australia as government ministers can simply declare entire groups of people criminal with absolutely no trial, no ability for the people to argue back and represent themselves just by fiat and without the ability to appeal.
The government can just dictate that you are now a criminal.
Your friends are criminals.
You guys being together is a criminal activity.
And again, no appeal, no ability to argue back.
So that's it.
And at the same time, of course, they're trying to get rid of jury trials in the UK and doing everything they can to destroy the concept of jury trials here in America, as we very much are literally losing the fundamental basic building blocks of our society as we become an increasingly tyrannical slave race under the globalist.
That's your daily dispatch brought to you, of course, by thealexjonesstore.com.
Starting today, every order placed at the alexjonestore.com will receive a free t-shirt as a $40 value, and it's a special limited edition t-shirt that cannot be purchased anywhere else.
So if you want to get this collector's item, go now to the alexjonesstore.com, make any purchase, and this very stylish t-shirt in your size comes free with the purchase.
$40 value, absolutely free.
What makes this deal so incredible is that there's no minimum spend limit.
Literally every order place will receive that free t-shirt.
I'm not even sure how we're making money on this at this point.
This deal will end Sunday, January 25th at midnight.
Make sure to go to the alexjonstore.com slash Harrison to let them know who sent you.
Again, that's a $40 value, absolutely free t-shirt, no minimum spend.
And make sure you're a VIP member while you're at it.
And of course, we have the new war cry smelling salts, the maximum strength smelling salts that I will not do on air because they will make me look like I'm crying.
They'll make me cry because they're just that powerful and strong and better than any other smelling salt I've ever used before.
And I've used a few.
With that, let's go to the World Economic Forum.
We got a lot of videos out of the cabal meeting on a mountaintop in total secrecy and security at the Swiss resort there.
And the Trump administration and myself, we are here to make a very clear point.
Globalization has failed the West and the United States of America.
It's a failed policy.
It is what the WEF has stood for, which is export offshore, farshore.
Find the cheapest labor in the world, and the world is a better place for it.
The fact is, it has left America behind.
It has left the American workers behind.
And what we are here to say is that America First is a different model, one that we encourage other countries to consider, which is that our workers come first.
I don't know who put the guitar behind it, but it was a very good speech, very rousing pro-America speech.
Of course, it's strange he has to tell them this.
You understand?
They know what they're doing.
Again, there's always this question of, are they stupid or are they evil?
And I'll admit, a lot of them are deeply unimpressive.
Like when you hear them talk, you think, how did this person run a lemonade stand, let alone a multi-trillion dollar company?
We understand that's because these people aren't used to talking in front of cameras and crowds and audiences.
They're hypersensitive to the fact that everything they say will be picked apart by millions of people around the world.
Like they understand now that Davos is not a clandestine meeting anymore.
We have blasted it open by force, and now they recognize that they're under massive scrutiny.
And so it's hard for them to talk freely.
So guys that I'm sure in the boardroom are sitting there going, We're going to move a billion dollars over here.
We need to really, you know, focus and prioritize this aspect of the business.
And let's not forget to put AI on the back burner while we do.
I'm like, I'm sure they're rapid fire.
And then you put them in front of camera and they're like, well, AI is so we really got to focus on AI.
And it's like, are these guys idiots?
No, they're hiding what they want to say.
Their brain is running a mile, you know, a thousand miles a minute, but they know that if they were to actually genuinely express themselves in a forthright and uninhibited fashion, we'd all hate them and understand that they're evil.
So they have to control themselves.
So they seem very unimpressive.
At the end of the day, these are, whether you like it or not, some of the smartest, most capable people in the world.
You don't make it to Davos without having some incredible qualities.
And so when you're having to explain to them, like, hey, maybe don't disintegrate the fundamental fabric of the nations that you're in charge of or have huge power up.
They don't need to be explained this.
Okay.
It was like explaining to an arsonist that fire burns things.
They know.
No, it's what they're doing.
They're doing it on purpose and they're perfectly aware of what they're doing.
So part of it's just kind of silly that these very simple things are being explained because these people know exactly what they're doing.
I guess by explaining it to them, in a way, it's just going, we know what you're doing.
And everybody who's not a retard understands as well.
Let's go to clip number 12 here.
Trump takes the stage saying it's great to be back to address such respected business people from around the world.
Let's go to clip number 12 here, Trump of the World Economic Forum.
It's great to be back in beautiful Davos, Switzerland, and to address so many respected business leaders, so many friends, a few enemies, and all of the distinguished guests.
So I said to my wife, yeah, sounds a little grab them by the ice shelf, I guess.
We want a little piece of ice, and they won't even give it to us.
I mean, but what he's doing here is going to the heart of the matter.
And it's what we talked about yesterday with Mark Carney admitting that the New World Order has failed and admitting that not only has the New World Order failed, it was always an illusion the entire time.
And the entire time, the specter, the idea of international law and the international rules-based community was always a lie.
It was always predicated on America being willingly submissive to Europe because Europe never had an ability to make us do anything.
It was always a matter of, well, the people that run America are in this with us, and they're going to help us to achieve our ends, which are not for the benefit of America or Europe or any country in Europe.
It's for the benefit of the globe.
And so while America allowed itself to be taken advantage of, allowed our wealth and our power and our prominence to be siphoned away and used for their agenda, they called it the rules-based international order.
As soon as America said, yeah, we're actually going to do what's best for us and not what's best for other people, they admit, yeah, well, you probably should have been doing that the whole time.
And you could have been doing that the whole time, and they had no ability to stop us from doing that the whole time.
We chose not to because we are ruled by traitors.
Let's go to clip number 13 here.
This is Trump calling out Europe for being utterly irrecognizable thanks to mass immigration.
It is running as fast as it can towards an incinerator.
Not that this was unnatural, not that this was natural, rather, not that this was unavoidable, that Europe has something intrinsic about it that is the engine to its downfall.
No, these are choices being made by the richest, wealthiest, most advanced, most prosperous civilizations the world has ever seen.
They decided that was bad.
They decided they were bad for that and they needed to be punished for how successful they were.
And so we needed to shoot ourselves in the knee.
And we wonder why Europe is collapsing.
It's collapsing on purpose because they wanted it to collapse.
Really not that complicated.
Let's go to clip number 22 here.
President Trump announces that prosecutions are about to commence.
The situation in Minnesota reminds us that the West cannot mass import foreign cultures, which have failed to ever build a successful society of their own.
I mean, we're taking people from Somalia, and Somalia is a failed, it's not a nation, got no government, got no police, got no military, got no nothing.
And then we have this fake congressperson who they just reported is worth $30 million.
You believe this?
Elan Omar talking about the Constitution provides me.
She comes from a country that's not a country, and she's telling us how to run America.
Not going to get away with it much longer, let me tell you.
And Trump and his associates are there to say, yep, no, that's true.
You definitely have lost to us, and it's time that you act like it.
Because they're still doing everything they absolutely can to continue.
All of the programs that we identified and rejected, they're now trying to reconfigure and continue.
Here's like DEI.
We say, we don't like DEI.
We don't like anything about it.
You have to stop.
And so I could show you 10 different videos of people at colleges and government buildings all going, well, we just, we kept doing DEI, but we just call it equity office now.
We just call it the togetherness office now, but it does all of the same stuff.
That's basically what the World Economic Forum is doing on a global scale as we reject their climate change agenda and everything else.
And we reject it on the face of it because they create the problems that they then pretend to solve.
And we recognize that most of the problems that they're trying to pump up aren't even real issues.
And then the solutions that they offer both won't solve anything that they're talking about and also creates a whole bunch of other problems.
So yeah, on the face of it, like we reject the climate change scam as a whole, but really we reject the underlying philosophy behind it.
We reject the underlying ideology that informs it.
We reject the anti-human agenda that it's covering, that it's a mask for.
We reject the ultimate goal of all of these programs, which whether it's climate change or mass migration or whatever else they're talking about, they all have the same goal, which is to create a one-world government ruling over a populace incapable of rebellion.
And that's it.
And that's the end of the end of their plans.
No matter what they're talking about, what form it comes in, that's the ultimate goal and nothing else matters to them.
Just re-emphasize that over and over again, just so we understand what it is we're actually dealing with here.
I want to go to this video.
I mentioned it.
James O'Keefe does it again.
StoriesandInfowars.com.
James O'Keefe infiltrates Davos.
Elites discuss weather modification agenda.
James O'Keefe media journalist wore a disguise and infiltrated the globalist World Economic Forum confab in Davos, Switzerland, where he heard secret discussions on carbon taxes, weather modification, and chemtrails and spoke about artificial rain with a World Economic Forum elitist.
I got to say, James O'Keefe not only continually, like regularly delivers unbelievable bombshell content, that really the only downside of it is nothing's ever done about the things he discovers.
I mean, he discovers fraud and rigged investigations and I mean, stuff that in any normal system would result in like not just arrest and convictions, but entire industries being shut down, entire swaths of the government being tried for treason.
None of that happens and it's unfortunate.
But James O'Keefe not only delivers consistent bombshell revelations, he's got to be having the most fun out of anybody.
I mean, I love it.
And you'll see all here in the video we're about to play.
It's got to be fun because he knows the language that they speak in.
And he is able to pretend to be like one of them.
And it's just awesome.
It really, I'm like, I would, why aren't I doing this?
I would love to, I'd love to go in with some of the globalists and start talking in their language and try to get them to think I'm one of them.
So not only is James O'Keefe killing it constantly, he's having the best time, and I just, I love to see it.
So let's go to clip number five here.
This is James O'Keefe of the World Economic Forum, convincing them to admit that they are manipulating the weather worldwide.
So we invest in these technologies to assist with the warming climate and the effect of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere will help block some of the warming.
And the particles stay in the air for one year.
And actually we're speaking to some of the airplane manufacturers to see if they can emit some of our technology into the atmosphere to help with the global warming.
That's right.
Yeah, climate.
I mean, we don't like to use the term climate engineering.
unidentified
scares people so we prefer but for me being an engineer I think that's actually what you do Oh, yes.
You can have financial engineer.
You can have, I'm sure, a climate engineer.
Because it involves something that's more scientific.
Now, this guy, Kennedy Ritchie, who runs a company called Floor Air, spoke on stage, and he says on his website that he wants to, quote, decarbonize the aviation industry.
He actually told me he was trying to eliminate contrails entirely, but then brought up cloud seating.
unidentified
A lot of their work actually came out of the military, so they do this all the time.
Now according to the website, Airborne, this is what this guy Richie brings up, measures snow depth, snow water equivalents, provides highly accurate snow pack data, is a commercial spin-off of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory snow monitoring technology used to help water managers and scientists.
unidentified
Earlier today in this room, Al Gore was in this room.
Larry Fink was in this room.
And now we're in the room talking to people about geoengineering weather modification and the trails that come behind airplanes.
What's going on?
I'm not saying my aluminum oxides in my lettuce.
Are you kidding me?
Seeing that again?
Aluminum oxides and oxides are part of the cocktail cannabis that they're spreading above our heads.
I think the movement towards tokenization, decimalization is necessary.
It's ironic that we see two emerging countries leading the world in decimal and the tokenization and digitization of their currency.
That's Brazil and India.
I think we need to move very rapidly to doing that.
We would be reducing fees.
We would do more democratization by reducing more fees if we had all investments on a tokenized platform that you could move from a tokenized money market fund to equities and bonds and back and forth.
We have one common blockchain.
We could reduce corruption.
So I would argue that, yes, we have more dependencies on maybe one blockchain, which we could all talk about.
But that being said, the activities are probably processed and more secure than ever.
So he's talking about a couple different things there.
Obviously, the push is for CBDCs, central bank digital currencies, and that is sort of the overwhelming push.
And putting this in context with what we've been talking about the rest of this week and the run-up to this, understand that their plans, their original plans, failed.
We defeated them.
Now they're coming up with their new plans.
And originally, it was climate change and it was migration and overpopulation and all these sorts of scams.
Outside was defeated.
So now they're sort of reduced down to the bare minimum.
Like, what do they actually need to achieve so that they don't lose?
What do they actually need to implement?
They got all these things they want to implement.
They're trying to reorganize entire populations and get us to eat bugs and get rid of farming.
And like all these things are kind of periphery.
Like they all contribute to the same overall agenda, but they're in trouble right now.
They're having to triage their agenda.
They're having to determine, okay, what do we actually need to achieve and what can we sort of let fall to the side?
They've determined their recipe for success is total AI surveillance, digital currency.
These two things combined, and a lot of things are covered under this, right?
When you have total surveillance, I'm talking of AI.
I'm talking of messages before they're even sent.
As we've seen, the UK is now forcing back doors to get around encryption by actually reading your message before they're encrypted and sent to the receiver.
So that's under the same umbrella framework as the AI surveillance grid, but AI surveillance, central bank digital currencies that can dictate what you can buy when you can buy programmable money.
That's what they've decided they need.
And of course, this, again, under that umbrella is biometric identification.
And this is what they're talking about.
So they've dropped sort of the periphery stuff and they're trying to determine what are the core components of our grid that we have to establish so that the rest of it can come to fruition.
And that's it.
As well as AI.
Let's go to clip number three here.
This is Bill Gates announcing a partnership with OpenAI to integrate health into the AI control grid framework.
AI is entering into the health system, but not just into the health system, it's all the way down to the level of the patient.
So the patient is able to talk in their local language and describe what's going on.
And so in order to make this a reality, to see what works, what doesn't work, we're thrilled that OpenAI and the Gates Foundation are committing an initiative called Horizon 1000, where we'll go into 1,000 primary healthcare clinics in Africa.
And you have different systems that we have to connect into.
Although not this initiative, there's obviously a lot going on in India as well.
And so over the next couple of years, I would expect developing world health may even get ahead of Rich World because the need is so great.
And the governments are embracing this and making sure that it's moving at full speed.
What he means is moving at full speed is the integration of the healthcare system into the AI control grid, all that other stuff about Africa and India.
That's where they'll be doing the testing of it because they don't have protections against stuff like this like we do in the West.
So once they normalize it there, they'll bring it here once they work out all the kinks, I guess.
But of course, we've been covering this for a couple of years.
It accelerated during 2020, but Amazon and Google have been systematically buying up healthcare files.
Like I remember doing a long report on this.
It's called like Operation.
It's not Operation Mockingbird, but it's named after a bird.
I'm totally blanking on it.
But it's a program that Google and Amazon are running.
It's named after a bird, the swallow, the swallow program, where they gobble up all the healthcare information.
Basically, they got agreements from insurance companies and hospitals that they would just store all of their information on the cloud and therefore give access to Amazon and Google to do research or have access to that information, including your private healthcare.
Again, this is always promoted as if it was helping people.
It never was.
And of course, it was laying the groundwork for the ultimate AI panopticon control grid that we've heard the people building it, like Larry Ellison, tell us what you need is all of the data about health, about money, about what you watch on TV, about your purchasing, everything in one place.
Once that's achieved, once they have a centralized database of everything on the planet, then their control will be complete and they can program the human race like a computer.
That's what they're going for.
That's what they want.
That's their ultimate goal.
Because then they can determine, you know, then again, revolution will be impossible.
If you can't even express revolutionary ideas, if you can't even understand revolutionary ideas, if you can't even conceive of a world in which, you know, revolution would be necessary.
Like they are really going for broke here and trying to create a permanent situation because they also think that they're on the cusp of being able to live forever.
And they're trying to create the world in which an individual can be, you know, technically immortal, not age, you know, not dying by age because of age.
And that is incompatible with the world as it exists right now.
The world as it exists requires death.
Otherwise, infinite growth, you know, it's just not possible.
You can't have everybody have infinite life.
You can't have everybody on earth living for 200, 300 years because they're going to have kids and then those kids are going to live 200, 300 years.
That's not feasible anyway.
No, what you need is a very small number of people that will be given granted access to the life extension technology and they will rule over everybody as immortal god kings, holding the promise of immortality over everybody else.
That if you just behave well enough or serve us well enough, perhaps you too can be welcomed into our ranks and allowed to live as immortals.
It's the promise of the snake in the Garden of Eden combined with the mark of the beast in Revelations.
It really is bringing it full circle.
And that's what's motivating a lot of these guys and what they're doing, what they're doing, what they're saying, and the things they're trying to establish and the rapidity with which they're desperate to get this stuff in place because they're all absolutely terrified of death because they're all spiritual blanks.
Let's go to clip number 26 here.
This is Bill Gates again looking troubled as he talks about needing more money.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Bill, the funding, is it governments pulling back?
Yeah, almost the top givers to global health have all reduced the amount they get.
And so, you know, Gabby raised, which does fundraising every five years.
They were in Brussels in June for the replenishment hosted by us and Ursula von der Leyen.
And we raised, we were down over 20%.
Global Fund actually, we were worried it would be even worse.
And so things went better than we expected, but it's still less money.
And so the Global Fund board sits there and says, okay, how much do we cut TB versus malaria versus HIV?
And that's, you know, the situation we find ourselves in.
And, you know, this has real impact.
From 2000 to 2024, we had record reductions in child to death much faster than ever in history.
In 2025, for the first time, more children died than the year before, 4.8 million versus 4.6 million.
And that's because donors cut money.
And if you can't, and some of them cut in a very abrupt, unexpected way that really disrupted things like getting malaria, chemoprophylaxis out, getting bed nets out.
And so we are, you know, we're dependent on these donors.
Maybe the donors don't want to participate in your evil schemes.
Good for them.
They shouldn't be participating in them in the first place.
Crew found what I was talking about, by the way, Project Nightingale.
That's a bird, right?
Project Nightingale is what it was called.
Look that up from a couple years ago.
Data storage and processing project by Google Cloud in Ascension, a Catholic healthcare system comprising a change of 2,600 hospitals, doctors' offices, and other related facilities in 21 states with tens of millions of patient records available for processing healthcare data.
Ascension is one of the largest healthcare systems in the United States with comprehensive and specific health care information of millions who are part of its system.
The project is Google's attempt to gain a foothold into the healthcare industry on a large scale.
Amazon, Microsoft, Apple Inc. are also actively advancing into healthcare, but none of the business arrangements are equal in scope to Project Nightingale.
And that really is just a start.
But if you want to find out some of the ways in which our healthcare information is being fed into giant AI databases for globalist programming, Project Nightingale is a good place to start.
2019, I remember covering it at Infowars then.
Amazon has a similar program that I think is actually more successful and is cooperating with, I believe, they're actually in bed with the government doing it, but certainly some of the bigger insurance companies.
So, yeah, it's all contributing to the same agenda.
It's all like they're all working towards the same ends, and they're the same ends we've been telling you about since Project Nightingale in 2019.
And we told you, here's what's happening.
They're going to get all this healthcare data.
They're going to combine it into databases so they can use it to control the people.
It's always been obvious.
It's just we have to stop them.
Yeah, Google drops Amazon's one medical.
Anyway, they're in on it together.
Let's go to clip 34 here.
Just since we're talking about the EU, talking about the CBDCs, rather.
And the EU is, in a very real way, planning and setting the groundwork for their rollout of the central bank digital currency, which will coincide with the collapse of the dollar as a global reserve currency.
If the globalists in power or the globalists who designed this system had their way, this would all come as the result of some sort of devastating World War III event.
But they may do it even without the cataclysm.
Let's go to clip number 34 here.
unidentified
We here in Europe, we live in a democracy, right?
Well, think again.
For instance, here in the Netherlands, even though the entire parliament voted against participating in the CBDC, the central bank digital currency, the Minister van Hoefe, this clown over here, went to the EU and Brussels and signed the agreement single-handedly, ignoring the will of both the parliament and the people.
Why?
Because she thinks it's important.
And in her words, her opinion also counts.
Also, the European Union put out a survey asking all European citizens what they think about the introduction of the CBDC.
The responses were overwhelmingly negative.
Everyone said, don't do it.
So, what do you think the EU did?
Exactly.
They ignored the will of the people.
And in the fourth quarter of this year, the first version of the CBDC will be released.
And then, in the second quarter of next year, the Dutch NLID wallet will be launched.
And this is where all your money will exist.
And it will be fully programmable.
That means they can control what you spend your money on.
For example, they could restrict you to buying only two closing items per month in the name of fighting climate change, of course.
Or they could require you to spend your savings before a certain date.
Otherwise, your savings would vanish just to stimulate the economy.
At that point, we have no financial freedom left.
Even though nobody wanted this, the people didn't want it, and the parliament voted against it.
That's a very good video, and he's exactly right, of course.
And when you really think about what that means when they're talking about programmable money, when it means no savings, it means no intergenerational wealth.
It means no saving up for a big purchase, right?
No big down payment, and then buying a house and having that as a store of money where you pay it off monthly.
At the end of it, you have this asset that you can sell.
No, just everything is in permanent.
Nothing is saved.
Legally, nothing can be saved.
Everything that you purchase also is not something that you will hold on to and pass on to your children.
Everything will be impermanent.
It is literally the brave new world construct that they're imposing on us.
We don't want it, but they're not asking us if we want it.
The 1994 Clinton-era FACE Act, meant to shield abortion mills from verifiable threats, got weaponized overnight when a pack of anti-ICE radicals, egged on and live-streamed by CNN has been Don Lemon.
This is the beginning of what's going to happen here.
When you violate people's due process, when you pull people off the street, you start dragging them and hurting them and not abiding by the Constitution.
When you start doing all of that, people get upset and angry.
Remember what the civil rights movement was about.
As you can see, all these pretend Christians, all these comfortable white people who are living lavish, comfortable lives while children are dragged into concentration camps.
These clowns barged in mid-service, falsely claiming some pastor doubled as an ICE honcho, scaring kids to tears, emptying pews, and forcing the whole congregation to scatter in distress.
All while Lemon played director, camera rolling, smugly defending the chaos as First Amendment theater and whining that disruption is just what protesting is about.
And, you know, I just imagine it's uncomfortable and traumatic for the people here, but that's what protesting is about.
And so you heard what some of the folks said in there, you know, that this is they shouldn't be there and, you know, they shouldn't be uncomfortable and this is our house and whatever.
That's what protesting is about, is to make people uncomfortable.
You may not like it.
It's called journalism.
First Amendment, all that stuff.
All of you people who believe in the First Amendment, absolutist.
There you go.
So why don't you talk to the actual person who is in charge of the organization and whose idea it was to have the protests at the church before you start blaming me for stuff for which you have no idea?
unidentified
How would you feel if I went into your house and I started yelling?
But Don, how is it that you defend yourself with First Amendment protections while simultaneously prohibiting the free exercise thereof of an establishment of religion, a violation of the very same amendment?
The FACE Act explicitly bans using force, threats, or physical obstruction to intimidate or interfere with people exercising their religious freedom at a place of worship.
An act the Biden administration used to prosecute at least 25 FACE Act cases involving roughly 60 defendants.
These cases accounted for roughly 24% of all FACE Act prosecutions in the law's 30-year history up to that point.
Take, for example, one of our witnesses here today, Paul Vaughan, who was prosecuted for praying outside of an abortion clinic.
Vaughn was arrested when an FBI SWAT team raided his home at gunpoint early in the morning in front of his wife and 11 children, later sentencing him to six months of home confinement and three years of probation.
Another FASE Act defendant, Lauren Handy, was sentenced to 57 months in prison for her role in protesting late-term abortion within our nation's capital.
And I would note, this happens to be an individual that I don't always align with philosophically.
In another grotesque prosecution, the weaponized Biden-Harris Justice Department recently sentenced a 75-year-old grandmother, Paulette Harlow, to a 24-month federal prison sentence.
And again, in the case of Eva Idol, an 89-year-old, I repeat, 89-year-old death camp survivor who is awaiting federal sentencing for welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Second hour of the war room is on, and I'm joined in studio by the raw egg nationalist, Dr. Charles Cornish Dale.
You can find him on X at babygravy9, raw eggnationalist.com.
I love that every time you're on and I read your username out, you laugh.
It's a great name, Baby Gravy 9 on X. Although, when I was trying to tag you today, it took me a second because I'm typing Raw Egg Raw Egg National.
What is Baby Gravy 9 on X, folks?
You got to follow him.
He's an Oxford and Cambridge educated historian and anthropologist who rose to prominence writing under that pseudonym Raw Egg Nationalist.
Of course, he's a writer for Infowars, and his latest book, published by Skyhorse, is called The Last Men: Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.
There it is.
And it's funny, I totally didn't make the connection that that's your name because I have your other book, The Egg Benedict option, where you're just credited as Raw Egg Nationalist.
So I saw this book and I thought, oh, he wrote a book with some doctor and got a byline.
Well, I think your book is very pertinent to everything going on right now because we talk about the psyops going on and the financial manipulation.
I try to remind the audience there's an underlying chemical element to this.
That one of the reasons that we're not seeing men stand up against tyranny is they are physically weaker, physically incapable of doing what previous generations were.
And a lot of that has to do with testosterone.
Talk a little bit about that, the underlying physicality, the chemical attack that the world is under.
Yeah, well, I mean, it's a real pleasure and a privilege to be here.
You know, I filled in for Alex on the fourth hour of the show, and Alex has done a huge, huge amount to raise awareness actually of the biological war that is being waged on modern men and on women too.
But, you know, it's been underappreciated.
You know, people can talk about the politics.
You can talk about left versus right.
You know, you can talk about liberty and tyranny and whatever, but actually, there's another kind of war, a silent war that's going on, you know, beneath the surface, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, herbicides, pesticides, birth control, the additives that are in processed food.
You know, they're all having this huge effect, huge biological effect on our vitality, on our resilience, on our hormone levels in particular.
And that's what the book is about.
The book is about the civilizational decline in testosterone levels that's been taking place for decades and not just the physical results of that, but also the political too, because it does have political implications.
So I was on with Breanna Morello this morning, and you know, we were talking about what it actually means to have a full society of men who are, or maybe not a full, but approaching a kind of full society, you know, where men have low testosterone.
What does that actually mean politically?
It means a lot of things.
It means, among other things, that men are easier to govern, less likely to resist, they're less patriotic.
They don't think the way and feel the way that men should feel, that men have been programmed to feel by hundreds of thousands, millions of years of evolution.
I mean, testosterone is the master male hormone.
It's essential to proper male health, but it also has political implications.
It also has political functions.
You can give a man a dose of testosterone and he will become happier with inequality.
A man administered a dose of testosterone gel is more likely to stand up and assert a minority viewpoint against the majority than the man who receives the placebo.
So, one of the, I mean, the book is about biology.
The book is about this biological assault that's taking place.
It's, you know, processed foods, sedentary lifestyles, exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals, glyphosate, atrazine, whatever.
But it's also about the nature of the political system itself.
So, I asked some quite unnerving questions actually about the nature of liberal democracy and whether liberal democracy basically is a low testosterone political system.
And I'm not really the first person to, well, I'm the first person really to frame the question in that way, but actually, thinkers like Francis Fukuyama, who is one of the main influences, Nietzsche too, have said some quite suggestive things about the role of, well, Fukuyama frames it in terms of thymos, which is an ancient Greek term for man's desire to assert himself, basically, his kind of vigorousness, spiritedness, if you will.
And he basically says, actually, liberal democracy, the triumph of liberal democracy, is a victory over a certain kind of thymos.
Men can't be men in particular ways within a liberal democratic system.
Well, actually, thymos is a good proxy for testosterone.
All of the kind of behaviors that we associate with thymos, assertiveness, motivation, patriotism, a willingness to fight, etc., those kinds of things, that's a proxy for testosterone.
So, you know, like you're in a low testosterone political system, which doesn't allow men to assert themselves in particular ways.
And then also, you've got this biological assault that's taking place as well.
So you're undermining masculinity from multiple directions at once.
And it is having a really vicious effect.
But it's something actually, you know, that like this crisis of masculinity literature, Jordan B. Peterson, for example, you know, his whole career, his whole career as a public intellectual was built off telling young men to clean their rooms.
Yeah, you're missing an essential element of what's going on.
Again, it's and you know, when you really think about what the implications are of this and like how this might impact you on a day-to-day basis, again, we have no idea.
And really, it's just like a dampening of our vitality across the board.
And one of the things I remember seeing, lower testosterone makes you less likely to go with your gut.
And that's just sort of the vernacular that we use.
What that means is your brain is taking in all these symbols you're unconsciously processing and you're sort of just delivered a conclusion that you didn't logically figure out.
It just is delivered to you.
But that's just a pure, you know, unfiltered, unprocessed, you know, absorption of reality.
So when you say, you know, lower testosterone means you're less likely to go with your gut, really that means you're being cut off from like this like immediacy to reality and an ability to even see and comprehend reality.
It's like we're having our glasses taken off and the world around us is fuzzy.
There's something very profound about that, I think.
Well, look, I mean, sometimes our instincts can be wrong.
We can be mistaken in our instinctual responses to a particular situation.
But instincts, stereotypes, prevail for a reason.
They endure for a reason because actually for hundreds of thousands of years since we've been modern humans and millions of years, our ancestors, our primate ancestors, you know, they've been, these instincts have driven us to survive.
You know, they are a survival mechanism and you need them.
You need them.
It is a survival mechanism.
But yes, I mean, having low testosterone, you're less likely to go with your gut.
That can be, that might be good in some situations, but it might also be actually catastrophic in others.
It might be catastrophic in a situation where actually, you know, maybe like the coronavirus pandemic, for example, you know, like the you don't know the science, you don't know about mRNA vaccines, but nevertheless, you can feel something is very wrong.
The government is doing something unheralded.
Something's very wrong.
They're not telling us.
You know, a man with high testosterone might be more inclined to resist that.
And it was very noticeable during the pandemic that, in fact, Jim Bros were one of the principal constituencies that just resisted on principle and said, look, no, you're not closing my gym.
You're not preventing me from exercising.
You're not preventing me from fortifying my body.
Because actually, that's what you need.
You need to be strong.
You don't make people strong.
You don't protect people by making them weak and keeping them inside.
You strengthen their body.
You build your natural defenses.
So, yeah, I mean, it's we don't fully understand everything about testosterone, but I think what we do understand actually should be telling us to take this civilizational decline much more seriously than we have been.
And so that's my main hope really with the book is that actually, look, I can restore the biological aspect to the discussion and say, look, okay, yeah, you've talked about what it's like to work in a corporation with an HR section that's totally run by, you know, like fat liberal women with pink hair.
And I mean, yeah, that's part of the crisis.
You know, like it's the feminization of the workplace and all these other things.
But actually, there's something else going on as well.
Well, it's a negative feedback loop, but it's encouraged.
I mean, you know, it's gone from sort of this, you know, maybe people didn't notice it, but testosterone was sort of on the decline anyway, just because of the natural consequences of the way our food is prepared and all of that stuff.
But then something happened, you know, about 10 years ago with the transgenderism and the feminism going absolutely crazy where they then decided, okay, we actually have to target men, target masculinity, deliberately destroy it.
And that's a whole other level of evil.
And of course, a feedback loop that was already in process is only having the gas slammed on it and going to go that much faster.
Well, I mean, one of the things that I often say, and it might seem a bit glib to some people, is that, look, if all of these industrial chemicals, all of these toxic substances that we're exposed to on a daily basis were increasing testosterone levels and making men more masculine, more vigorous, more likely to stand up for themselves, more assertive, et cetera, more patriotic, you can bet that the governments of the world would have brought in stringent regulations.
Absolutely.
Cleaned up the environment, you know, clean as a whistle.
No more chemicals being released into the water, into the food supply, et cetera.
But because these chemicals actually make us more compliant, they make us more dependent and docile, nothing's really done about it.
And it's something that can easily be dismissed as a conspiracy theory, as the gay frogs, famously, the gay frogs conspiracy theory was 10 years ago.
I mean, it's always a funny thing, isn't it, to look at the health ministers of various different nations.
And well, I mean, and also, you know, Lloyd Austin, the Secretary of Defense, you know, there's that famous series of pictures of him during the coronavirus pandemic, you know, inspecting the troops with a mask and the other masks.
And then now what have you got?
You've got Pete Hegseth.
Who is doing PT with, I mean, was a soldier himself.
I mean, that's what it means to lead by example.
I mean, a lot of liberals don't understand actually just how important that is.
And they don't get why Pete Hakeseth is so popular with the troops.
Well, it's because actually he goes out early morning and does PT with them.
He does log carries.
He does a run with them.
He does push-ups.
And the same with JD Vance.
I mean, it's like this is that's actually what leadership looked like for the entire span of human history until 50 years ago, 70 years ago, maybe even less than that.
And it does have a biological component.
It is a biological thing.
I mean, the original aristocracies were all war aristocracies.
I mean, the best example of this, of course, is the Norman Conquest, right?
William the Conqueror beats the Anglo-Saxons and replaces wholesale the Anglo-Saxon nobility of England with Normans he's brought over and who fought with him at the Battle of Hastings.
And we always talk about there's a very interesting overlap between martial arts, fighting sports and right-wing politics, because theory falls apart when you're in the ring, right?
You can have all the convoluted ideas you want, and liberalism is entirely propped up by these convoluted, high-falutin academic ideas that don't bear any weight in reality.
That all falls apart when you get punched in the face.
And a similar thing, I think, is happening with the ICE protests where you have these women going out and getting in the faces of these six and a half foot tall men.
But they think that they're in a game where they can't get hurt and they are the tough ones.
They're the strong ones because they're on the right side of history.
And it's like, it's just this delusion that's totally disconnected.
So physical strength, there's just something real and undeniable about it that maybe it's that reality that the left just fears and hates and wants to run away from.
Yeah, well, it was very sad, actually, watching the aftermath of the shooting of René Good and hearing her wife or husband saying, I thought you didn't have real bullets.
And it's like, well, yeah, because this isn't a game.
And actually, you've been watching your Marvel films and playing your girl boss video games and, you know, thinking that you can just, you know, like defeat the evil empire, defeat the evil Nazis like you might in a game or you might see on the.
And it's not like that.
Like it's not like that.
I mean, if you're genuinely going to pose a threat to a law enforcement officer, what's going to happen?
I mean, they're going to protect themselves and they have every right to.
And that's been the norm in every single society up until now, up until ours.
And it was the norm here until not that long ago.
But now suddenly the rules of the game have been changed, or at least these people think rules have been changed.
And they can behave like that with impunity.
I mean, you can't try to run a police officer or a law enforcement agent over.
And again, and it's about this imposition where you've got these guys that could easily take out all of the people opposing them, but there's this just, we just live in this imaginary world where these incredibly weak and unimpressive people are somehow getting the better of these very strong and impressive guys.
Yeah, well, Sigmund Freud called it the return of the repressed.
He was talking about psychological phenomena.
But it is a psychological phenomenon, but it's also a physical and a social phenomenon.
But yes, it does return.
I mean, you can try and sit on reality for as long as possible and keep it down, but it has this horrible habit of reasserting itself because it's real, because it's the actual nature of the world.
And then again, to connect, because I just can't help but draw these connections between what we're talking about and then the World Economic Forum.
And one of the big things of the World Economic Forum is you had Mark Carney basically admitting, yeah, the rules-based international order was never real because we never had ability to stop a strong state from ignoring us.
And there's something about that that I feel like connects to ICE, where it's like we're choosing, we're voluntarily participating in this submissive activity.
We don't have to.
America never had to be subject to European courts, but for the sake of the world, we decided to.
But it feels like that illusion is falling.
And we're just like, why are we doing this?
Why are we playing this game with these weaker people to where we can pretend that they're in charge?
I mean, the rules-based international order is a legal fiction.
It's a legal fiction that emerged in the aftermath of World War II.
But it was always a fiction.
And in many respects, it was America voluntarily tying its hands behind its back.
And, you know, I mean, civilization in certain respects obviously does depend on people relinquishing violence as the go-to option for everything.
You know, like you can't have a civilized society if the recourse in any situation is just for the stronger person to smack the weaker person on the head with a club.
But what you can't do is you can't eliminate violence as an option.
I mean, there's that great quote from Starship Troopers, isn't there, about, you know, the basis of all morality is violence or the basis of all order is violence.
And it's, we don't need to talk about whether Starship Troopers is a satire or not because rehashing that every five minutes on Twitter.
But, you know, like, it's true.
I mean, it's actually true.
And I think, you know, Americans feel, and Donald Trump certainly feels, you know, that actually, okay, well, we've tied our hands behind our backs and we haven't actually benefited from that.
And so maybe let's untie our hands and maybe let's actually go and get what we want because the country has been deliberately collapsed.
Or at least they've tried to collapse it and got quite far along that road.
And so actually, no, I mean, we're not, we're not going to go along with measures that actually harm America simply for the sake of maintaining this fiction that we live in a rules-based international order when we don't, because other countries don't obey.
And again, it's like the same thing's happening on the international level is happening on the national level where, you know, if a family member of mine was injured by somebody, I don't have to wait for the court to take care of it.
I'm capable of wielding my own justice, but you suppress that and you participate because you understand that if everybody were to act impulsively like that, it wouldn't be a civilization.
But I have to know that I am going to get justice at the end of the day.
That by not fulfilling my desire to go out and get justice myself, the society that we built will provide it for me.
But that's going away too now.
And people are, I mean, you've got the racial aspect of juries.
You've got juries being forced to admit, yeah, that guy was guilty, but we didn't want him to be guilty because he's black and we're black, or whether it's just not charging people who commit crimes.
I mean, people are losing faith in the justice system and are going to start taking things into their own hands.
And that's when everything collapses.
I mean, talk about a feedback loop.
Once that gets going, there's really no stopping it.
We're going to go to a quick commercial break here in just a second, and we'll be back on the other side with Dr. Charles Cornish Dale, known better as Raw Egg Nationalist.
You can follow him on X at babygravy9, raw eggnationalist.com.
His new book is titled The Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.
We'll have to send you home with some of the high-quality bovine colostrum plus or the tallow or maybe one of these big knives, but you might get arrested for having this.
Now, maybe we don't send you back to the UK with a giant dagger.
You can play with them while you're here.
Go to the alexjonesore.com to support us.
I hope that you do.
My guest sitting in the studio with me is Raw Egg Nationalist, Dr. Charles Cornish Dale.
His new book is called The Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.
You can find it at raw eggnationalist.com.
There it is.
Fantastic stuff.
And obviously, the World Economic Forum is going on right now.
Well, I mean, it's just hard to ignore Trump, isn't it?
I mean, he's just been on such a tear laughing at Emmanuel Macron's sunglasses and maybe suggesting that Brigitte Macron has slapped him in the face again.
I mean, like JD Vance said, going into the lion's den and just not giving an inch, not backing down.
You know, this is, you know, we've been talking about masculinity, weak men, strong men.
I mean, you only need to contrast Trump with someone like Mark Carney, right?
I mean, this is the vision of, this is the difference between weak men and strong men representing their countries, representing their country's real interests rather than the interests of a narrow globalist elite, you know, that is quite happy to despoil their nations and, you know, sell their nations down the river and replace the native population wholesale.
You know, you've got a brave, basically Alpha Chad, Giga Chad leader who just goes there and just says what he thinks and deals with the consequences.
And it is amazing how much, as a general rule, you know, people hate a man who says what he thinks and feels and stands by it in the face of, because, I mean, he's there basically on his own.
He is in the lion's den.
It's the whole world against him.
And they had that stupid no-kings display up on the mountain and stuff.
I mean, he's the main character, of course, at Davos.
As much as, you know, we might complain about he's not arresting enough people and all that stuff.
He provides such a potent model for the great man as it can exist in the modern age.
And actually, that was where I first heard the word you used earlier.
I wrote it down because I always forget it.
Thimos was a video from Sargon of Akkad, Carl Benjamin, talking about the great man theory and that it was this, you know, what Trump represented is this return of something that the liberal elite told us was over forever.
That was the past, the great man theory.
First, well, they'll say it never really existed.
It's all trends and forces.
But basically, they don't want to believe that men with vision and ideas can actually alter the course of all of human history.
You could talk about the return of Caesarism or whatever, the return of the great man at the end of the sort of dying republic or whatever.
But I mean, yeah, it is a return to the great man theory.
I mean, it's a direct, Donald Trump is a direct refutation of the notion that one man cannot change the world because he really has, through sheer force of personality and will, it's inspiring because, of course, it ramifies, we were talking about this in the break, it ramifies at every single level.
So it's not just the fact that we're told that actually great men don't exist, great men, capital G, capital M, it's that men don't exist.
It's that individuals don't exist.
It's that we're all prey to social forces and structures.
You know, we don't really have any agency, but actually you do.
And to watch Donald Trump doing that kind of stuff, being so defiant, standing up in the face of all of these awful globalist lickspittles.
You know, I mean, that is inspiring.
That is, that is, that's empowering, I think, on an individual level as well as a national level.
I mean, I think people are going to be talking about him for the next 2,000 years.
And the way that he opened up X has had profound effect on the course of human history from here on out.
The fact that we are even aware of certain things that we wouldn't be aware of otherwise.
Alex Jones, I'd put in that same mold, right?
He just did it.
Nobody paved the way for him.
There was no position he was slotted into.
You had to be a Maverick.
He had to blaze his own trail, and you can do that.
And there's something fundamental about that, right?
There's something, but there's also something that it's almost like a fail-safe.
Like it's almost like when we want to trust the system, but at a certain point, the system starts to break down and you, you know, like we're relying on these men like Elon Musk or Donald Trump to sort of step in that gap and haul things back as an individual.
And it's almost, it's like it's a condemnation of our systems that we require people like Trump and Elon Musk.
Do you see what I'm saying?
Do you know what I mean?
That it's like, I'm glad that Elon Musk stepped up, bought X and opened up free speech, even though all the prevailing winds against him.
But we shouldn't need that.
We should already have free speech.
Our system should uphold these things.
We shouldn't need to rely on these individuals.
It's not a safe bet that we're always going to be delivered an Elon Musk or a Trump.
We need systems that can uphold these rather than the men.
No, I mean, I do think that the emergence of strong men and the return of the great man, whether you're talking about Trump or whether you're talking about Musk, is a condemnation of the system, of course.
It's like, you know, all the hopes of the nation rest upon this one person or these two or three people.
And yes, you can't, although it does seem to be a, let's say, it is something of an historical cycle or a historical rule that actually these people do emerge in times of crisis, in times of profound confusion.
You do get someone who somehow just seems to embody the hopes and fears of the entire nation.
I mean, Donald Trump really is in his person, and I've written about this kind of extensively.
But like, but yeah, I mean, we can't be complacent, I think, in just assuming that, I mean, yes, we have these great men, but we can't just be complacent in assuming that they're going to solve everything.
I mean, we have to work too.
We have to push too.
We all have to bear some of the load, even if, nevertheless, you have these titanic figures who are carrying basically the hopes and fears and destiny of a nation on their back.
And one of the important things about the great men is that they inspire that in other people, or they give you a path forward, which is why the powers that be now are so insistent on punishing Trump and punishing Musk as an example to go, you think you can stand up against us, but we will destroy you in the end as a signal to everybody who might be inspired by them.
And also, what they try to do is they try to delegitimize them in various different ways.
Oh, Donald Trump was never a successful businessman.
Donald Trump was just Donald Trump was a Nepo baby.
He inherited money from his father, who was a kind of real estate mogul in New York or whatever.
And the same with Elon Musk, right?
Oh, his family were in diamonds before or whatever.
And he's just stolen money from people.
So he's not actually a great man.
He isn't a visionary.
He isn't maybe our only hope at the moment, certainly, of becoming an interplanetary species and colonizing Mars and then from there the rest of the solar system, whatever.
No, it's just these people are just thieves.
Yeah.
They're robber barons, basically, is what they are.
And I mean, I think because their project is the transformation of society in a very particular way.
But, you know, we were talking before the show about Robin Hood, and you were saying about there's a new Robin Hood film that's coming out that's called The Death of Robin Hood.
Well, so it's, you know, it's like it's one of these, of course, it's got Hugh Jackman in it, I think, as an elderly Robin Hood.
But basically, the tagline is something like, he was no hero.
Of course.
Of course, right?
And so it's like Robin Hood at the end of his life confessing his sins, you know, and he's he's an old man and he's killed people and he's robbed and you know, he wasn't actually a good man.
He didn't deserve to be mythologized.
He wasn't a hero.
And that's what that's what happens.
I mean, we see this happening across us.
It's not just Donald Trump.
It's not just Elon Musk.
It's male role models across the board.
And that's part of the reason why we have all of these kind of ridiculous girl boss films and all of these stereotypes of there was actually an article about this the other day about the fact, you know, why is Hollywood and TV so obsessed with mediocre men, the mediocrity of men and the kind of suppressed excellence of women.
And so it's like, who run the world?
Girls, right?
They're the women secretly are the competent ones.
And so we're told, for example, you know, with the NASA moon landing, oh, it was the longhand calculations of this young woman.
I mean, it makes you sigh and you're like, oh, not another film where they've, you know, it's like the Predators film that they did where it was among the American Indians, you know, and it's a girl boss fighting the Predator with a bow and arrow, and you've gone from Arnie with a, you know, with a chain gun.
And actually, and again, just to reference him again, Sargon of Akkad came out with a really brilliant video recently.
And I actually keep having it in my video list, but I haven't gone to it yet.
But he's talking about Tolkien and George R. Martin and the contrast between these two worldviews.
And I think that sort of applies to what we're talking about because it's sort of the best embodiment of these two ideas.
You have Aragorn, the quintessential great man, right?
The return of the king, the great man, you know, swooping in to save his people.
Whereas in George R. Martin, his whole reason he writes books is to bash that down and to say, no, your heroes are worthless and will be killed and all the evil people will win.
And there's something very fundamental about that where again, you know, people are still to this day obsessed with Lord of the Rings.
It was written 100 years ago.
Game of Thrones has been off the air three years and nobody even cares about it anymore.
And I mean, it's a fundamental mistake because, of course, you know, people will say, well, you know, there's no hard and fast point at which white becomes black, right?
And that's true.
You know, you shade through from one to the other.
But nevertheless, you can represent at the opposite end of the spectrum.
You can see that actually white is not black.
Right.
And so, I mean, yeah, I mean, if you want to depict a kind of fantasy medieval set, setting in in morally ambiguous terms, and you want to suggest maybe, that actually, you know, even the good guys have to employ foul means in order to whatever, or that people don't get what they deserve um, but that happens in Lord Of The Rings too.
I mean, does Boromir deserve to die, right?
Uh, you know lots of.
There's a complexity to Lord Of The Rings.
It's a different kind of complexity and it's an attempt to to tell a story, I think on a grand, a really grand scale.
Uh, verging on the mythological, and I mean Tolkin was Tolkin had this idea that actually um, the 20th century modern, the modern world, needed new, a new mythos, right and um, a mythos isn't a tax policy, isn't an exposition of a tax policy, a myth.
A mythos is an is an organizing narrative, that that provides you with a clear direction yeah, in which to, in which to orient yourself in the world, in order to act meaningfully.
And um, you know that's, that's what the Lord Of The Rings is.
It's yeah like, fight for, fight for your people, fight for what's right.
And it's so funny because the, the left seems bent on like shattering these illusions, but they aren't illusions.
Lord Of The Rings is more realistic, I think, than than Game Of Thrones is.
And actually you, it was you that asked me to write an article about the Alamo.
So i've I, you know, I look to the Alamo of something it's like, it's like a fantasy movie, it's like this, this idea of these, you know, this ragtag group of nobodies who goes up against this army of thousands and they die.
But in their sacrifice, you know, victory is born.
It's like, no, actually good guys don't always lose.
Actually, you know the the left wants us to believe that you know nothing good ever happens.
Actually, it's what Alex Jones always says.
You know the the devil's greatest trick was not convincing people he didn't exist.
The devil's greatest trick is convincing people good doesn't exist, to fight back against him.
And that's where I think the George R Martins of the world are coming from.
Is they think it's you're you're.
You're a, you're a stupid child.
If you believe good exists and can defeat evil, evil will always win.
It's a self-fulfilling prophecy to a great Extent too.
Well, one of the funny things actually about the sort of Lord of the Rings discourse as a result of the Rings of Power in particular has been this attempt to humanize the orcs.
And we've seen it, we've seen it before, actually, in the kind of Starship Troopers discourse where you get leftists saying, oh my God, you really think that the humans are the good guys?
I mean, no, like it's, it's a, it's a normal thing to be in favor of your own species.
I mean, you know, trying to extend the kind of imperialism metaphor.
But yeah, I mean, they're really, they're really pushing this idea that actually you should watch the rings of power and you should actually think, well, the orcs, you know, they, okay, yeah, they're aggressive.
But, you know, like, they're just trying to protect their own people.
They want to have a land of their own, to have children and raise their families.
And it's just, it's so confused.
It's so insane and confused.
I mean, it almost doesn't, it doesn't stand up to scrutiny and it certainly doesn't stand up to any kind of like I don't even know.
I think you just almost present it on its own terms.
You just say, like, look, I mean, this is these people genuinely, genuinely think that, you know, you should be rooting for the orcs, for the bugs in Starship Troopers.
No, their moral sense, their moral intuitions are so corrupted and they're so obsessed with victimization and imperialism and the kind of the kind of crime of self-assertiveness and self-interest and kind of protecting your own that they'll just come out with this crazy stuff.
But you know, what's quite funny actually about George R. R. Martin is that he can't finish the Game of the Thrones series, you know, because he's actually written himself and he's admitted this.
He's written himself into a corner where he's killed off anybody who was noble, anybody who was worthy, anybody who could actually carry the narrative forward in a way that would be not just satisfying, but also even just like logical.
Is it just a kind of directionless story where it's just people endlessly slaughtering each other, which isn't really a story at all?
It's just, it's carnage.
Or is it actually a story where you do have a hero and someone you can root for?
And, you know, I mean, they kind of had to, well, they resurrected Jon Snow, didn't they?
Yeah, and they made it very, very kind of Hollywood, I think, in the way that it finished because they kind of had to restore something satisfying to the narrative.
It's like, I mean, you can watch the Red Wedding and, oh, this is shocking.
You know, we never expected that this guy that we all liked would be murdered like this and his whole family and whatever.
But you can't actually build a satisfying narrative around that.
Like 10 seasons of that would just be, it's just, it's actually boring.
It makes you very jaded.
And I think, I mean, I think a lot of Redditors who kind of really like that sort of stuff are pretty jaded anyway.
And I think George R.R. Martin is probably quite jaded too.
And I think you do only need to look at, you know, the way that people are abandoning these new kind of revisionist versions of the Lord of the Rings and all that kind of stuff to see that.
Like people really do, people do really want a traditional narrative that's structured in a way that is that is comprehensible, that can actually provide some kind of orientation in real life.
And I get, you know, with Lord of the Rings and George R. Martin, I mean, he is taking a form that is built on the back of, like the spine of the fantasy novel is the hero.
So it's like, how do you make this and then, you know, withdraw the most important aspect of it, which is the central heroic character that wins against all odds.
Like without that, you're just, you know, no one would watch Star Wars if Luke got blown up in the final trench run and, you know, the empire continued.
I think I'll tell the crew, because I pulled in the video yesterday and it's pretty long, but the very end of Sargon's video, I thought, was especially powerful.
Because again, it is about inspiring, inspiring people with reality and knowing that actually good wins because it's good.
Evil doesn't win because it's evil.
You just need good people to fight.
And we're going to open up the phone lines for your calls next hour as well.
So if we can open up the phone lines, now I'll go ahead and give out the number.
It's 1877-789-2539.
We do need to get some videos from the World Economic Forum and other stuff going on.
And we've just been having a great time talking about masculinity as a concept.
When we get back, we'll talk about how this impacts with geopolitics.
In the meantime, I do want you to go to thealxjonestore.com.
Remember, you're getting a free shirt with any purchase of any size at thealxjonesstore.com.
Go to the alexjones.com slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you.
It is a $40 value, a $40 shirt, but you get it absolutely free and it's the only way you can get it.
So if you're trying to collect all the InfoWar shirts, you need to go now to the AlexJonesStore.com.
Any purchase gets you that free shirt.
And this only goes on for a few more days.
So go now, the AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison.
And we'll be back on the other side with hour three, your calls and more.
All right, welcome back, folks.
Third hour of the war room is on.
I'm actively trying to drag in this video from Sargon of Akkad, aka Carl Benjamin, in his video on Aragorn's tax policy, the difference between George R. Martin and J.R.R. Tolkien and what they value and why some of their stories resonate with us and others don't.
Just dropped it in there, number one.
Let me know when you have that and we'll go to it.
In studio with me is Dr. Charles Cornish Dale, aka Raw Egg Nationalist.
Follow him on X at babygravey9 and raw eggnationalist.com is where you can find his new book, The Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.
So we can go to this video here.
This is again from Sargon of Akkad.
The video is called something about Aragorn's tax policy, but this is the very end.
I thought this was a very inspiring last couple minutes.
His storytelling thereby acts as a narcotic in which he attempts to demoralize us in the same way that he himself has been demoralized.
He is trying to make us accept that the rule of Sauron is inevitable.
And it is in this frame which his own story is trapped, contained, and strangled.
The question, what is Aragon's tax policy, is the first step down this road.
And what then we can ask is the result of accepting the reign of Sauron?
Will men resign themselves to the boot of the outsider being forever on their neck?
Will they give up all pretense of morality, of heroic struggle, of self-sacrifice, of attempting to bring a just moral order into existence, even if that moral order is deeply flawed?
Well, in Morgoth's essay about Warhammer 40,000, he actually answered this question as he wrote, the answer to George R.R. Martin's question, what would Aragon's tax policy be, is 10,000 psychers sacrificed daily to feed energy into the corpse of a god-emperor holding the line against the forces of hell itself.
No, men will not give up the struggle.
And no matter how bad things get, we will, in fact, cling to whatever kind of order we can bring together in the face of evil, no matter how insufficient it might seem to a liberal in their comfortable armchair, and no matter what the cost.
It doesn't matter how late the hour, how dark the night, how dire the situation.
We will never give ourselves over to the disgusting, weak liberal nihilism that declares that everyone is as bad as everyone else.
We will not capitulate to the moral reign of Sauron, the perversion of the world, and the despoiling of the very notion that there can be a worthy good.
And no sad boomer libtard is going to change that.
It is not inevitable that Sauron wins.
It is not inevitable that the world slips into vice.
And it is not guaranteed that the heroes will fail.
We will do whatever it takes for however long is necessary because the struggle is the forces of good against the forces of evil.
The forces of order against the forces of chaos.
The forces of justice against the forces of injustice.
And it is the only war worth fighting.
And so I am afraid, George, that the time is nigh for you to pick aside and finish your book.
And the Warhammer 40K stuff is very funny because, of course, you know, Warhammer 40K as it has become and Warhammer as it has become more popular has also been subject to a kind of redditification where people are like, you know, you're not supposed to like the Space Marines.
You know, you're not supposed to be rooting for humanity, right?
You know, they're like space Nazis.
You know, you know, the Emperor is immortal Space Hitler.
I think it's actually written for a variety of different audiences.
I mean, there is direct practical advice in the book about protecting or conserving your masculinity, developing your masculinity, how to protect yourself against exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals, that kind of thing.
So there's, I mean, it's a part of my work really that I actually, you know, I paint quite a dismal picture, you know, of the kind of biological reality of life today.
But I also do try to empower people to do things because there are things that you can do.
You can protect yourself.
You might not be able to eliminate your exposure to microplastics, but you can mitigate it significantly just through simple things like not drinking water from a plastic bottle or not heating food in plastic containers in the microwave.
So, I mean, it's directed at men who are looking to improve their masculinity, to develop their testosterone.
But it's actually, it is a serious philosophical book, and it's framed in a serious philosophical way.
I mean, I do think that there is something to this notion that actually the political crisis today is also a biological crisis.
And so it is a serious, philosophically informed attempt actually to redirect this whole discourse about masculinity and about the kind of course of liberal society in a more biological direction.
So it will appeal to lots of different people.
I mean, it's written as a popular book.
So it's not impenetrable.
It's not written as an academic book.
It's not written, you know, like my PhD was.
It's not kind of referenced like a PhD or whatever, and it's aimed at a popular audience.
Of course, it's not your fault that you're painting a dismal picture.
You are presenting reality in reality at this point.
Rather dismal, one might say.
So again, the book is The Last Men, Liberalism.
Sorry, why can't I find it here?
The Last Men, Liberalism and the Death of Masculinity.
Sorry, I just wanted to get it right there.
From Skyhorse Publishing, and you can find it at raw eggnationalist.com.
And again, it just fits perfectly into InfoWars as an outlet.
As we've always said, you know, there are two sort of approaches that we take.
You have to try to solve these problems at the systemic level while also not being victims to the stuff on an individual level.
And this fits perfectly, right?
We need to correct the systems that are poisoning us, that are diminishing our testosterone.
But we can't wait on the whole system to change.
You also need to be taking actions in your own life to mitigate some of the more devastating consequences of the modern world.
So it just fits in perfectly.
And again, with Maha and MAGA, it's like this whole movement, however you want to define it, it really is like the InfoWars Alex Jones movement that brought all these seemingly disseparate threads together.
And in that way, you really open up to people that aren't necessarily aligned with us politically because everybody recognizes you need clean air, you need clean water.
I've gotten in in-depth conversations with hippie chicks at parties about what water filter they like because it's like we might not have anything in common, but we both eat food and we both want the food not to be poisoned.
Is that not something we can come together on?
So there's really a lot of opportunities for unity when it comes to health, biology, this sort of stuff.
And I mean, one of the interesting things about the recent development of politics in the States, about the election campaign in particular, was that actually, you know, the Democrats didn't offer an alternative to RFK Jr.
And so much of, you know, I mean, it was hippie, it was left-wing hippies in the 1960s and 70s who were talking about raw milk and about getting enough sunlight and about reconnecting with nature and avoiding food laced with pesticides, organic food, all this kind of stuff.
And yet now it's raw milk is a right-wing dog whistle.
Yeah, I mean, I think that this is really the kind of blueprint, actually, I think, for the future of politics.
It really is the foundation of a kind of broad political movement that can actually draw people from the left and the right together in pursuing the same objectives.
I mean, surely we want our children to be healthy.
We don't want our children to grow up with metabolic dysfunctions, with reproductive problems, with low fertility, low testosterone, all these kinds of things.
And so, I mean, yes, it's, I think it's a real change.
And, you know, when I first came on the scene, a lot of people would, especially on the right, would say to me, well, you know, why does health matter?
Why are you presenting this as a political thing?
And I'm like, trust me, this is political.
I mean, health is the health of the, I've said this before, that a nation is only as strong as the individuals of which it's composed.
That's the basic kind of insight of raw egg nationalism that I've became the figurehead, this movement that I became the figurehead of that has kind of transitioned into Maha and fed into Maha.
Like, yeah, I mean, you can make an almost like an apolitical political case for something like Maha.
And that's why it's so powerful.
And the longer that the Democrats don't actually really sort of understand that, I mean, the more the advantage goes to whoever has RFK Jr. in their camp and whoever is kind of leading the Maha movement.
But yeah, I think it's I think it's been a big success.
It's been very positive.
I mean, you know, okay, you've got people, you know, of course, they're abusing RFK Jr. and he's still got members of his family speaking out about him and calling him this and that and saying he's a bad guy.
But, you know, I mean, it's an overwhelmingly positive movement.
The objectives are overwhelmingly positive, like protecting the children, protecting the environment, conserving what's important for the next generation.
Well, I mean, in the book, then there is a chapter in the book specifically about the gay frogs controversy and about why Alex Jones was right.
But in particular, it's about there's a new study or a reasonably new study.
It was new when I wrote the book that shows for the first time really a direct link between exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals during gestation, so in the womb, and transgenderism later in life.
And there was always the prima fascia case for that was always there.
It was there when Alex Jones was talking about the Tyrone Hayes atrazine frog experiments in 2015.
But now we, and it's been a subject actually that researchers haven't wanted to touch.
So they could have done the research.
They could have followed on from the frog studies in 2010 and said, okay, if atrazine is doing this to frogs, let's look at rates of transgenderism and let's see if they correlate with exposure to atrazine.
Let's see, let's plot on a map of America, you know, because you can plot how much atrazine is sprayed over, you know, I mean, there are maps that you can bring up on Google Maps now that will show you where atrazine is sprayed the most in the US.
And, you know, you could look at rates of transgenderism and see if there's a correlation and then you could go from there.
They just didn't do it because it was politically explosive.
And I think they actually lobbied to not do it, right?
There was a potential bill coming forward that would have made them do these tests and the companies lobbied to not have them done because they knew what the answer would have been, I think.
Yeah, and so, you know, but now there's this study that shows, you know, like it was of French boys and their mothers had been exposed to this estrogenic chemical called diethyl stilbestrel, which was given to women who had bad cases of morning sickness and had miscarried before.
So it was given to them while they were pregnant and then the boys who were given it ended up with something like a hundred or even a thousand-fold increased risk of becoming transgender.
Wow.
And so that's a direct correlation.
Now, you can't just say, well, we can infer from the frog studies.
It's like, actually, no.
I mean, look, we've got a direct suggestion of causation.
But it's such a the transgenderism issue is so integral to the left's vision of not only of transforming society, but of transforming the individual, liberating the individual from the last, from the few remaining bonds.
So we liberate the individual from class and we liberate them from race and whatever.
But what's left?
Gender.
You liberate the individual from gender and you can be whatever you want to be.
You can be a man, you can be a woman.
Whatever you choose, it's a sincere decision that is totally yours.
And what the scientific literature suggests is that no, actually, chemicals are messing with people's wiring.
Chemicals are interfering with fundamental biological processes that begin at the moment of conception in the womb and continue through childhood and puberty into adulthood.
These chemicals like atrazine, diethylstobestrol, phthalates, BPA, interfere with the crucial testosterone to estrogen ratio.
And yeah, they might be responsible for gender dysphoria.
They might be responsible for physical disfigurements, you know, development of the penis and testes or vagina or whatever that isn't correct.
And so, you know, individuals think that they're intersex.
And then, you know, you have an obliging liberal regime that's more than happy to hack off their genitals and turn them inside out or the opposite.
And so, yeah, I mean, it's a conclusion that the left cannot face.
Well, because it takes it out of the realm of cultural equality where they say, well, being gay, being straight, being trans, being non-trans, it's all the same.
Well, when it comes to nature, when it comes to animals, there's functional and there's dysfunctional.
And these frogs are dysfunctional.
And being transgender, you know, which wouldn't be the case, but it'd be basically the frogs were turning gay, which means they were trying to mate with other males.
Well, they were successfully mating with other males as well.
So this is the crazy thing.
So when atrazine was introduced to the larvae, the male larvae were turning to females who could then successfully mate with males and produce viable offspring.
Yeah, so it's, you know, it's not like you can say, well, everything is equal.
Each choice is as good as the other.
When you're talking about science, when you're talking about nature, when you're talking about beings that are not making conscious decisions but following instinct, there is functional and dysfunctional.
And what's happening is these chemicals are making dysfunctional beings.
And what's, you know, I mean, I make a case for, although I advocate and I say, look, this is, we've got this scientific evidence, you know, this is biology, this is real.
You know, like if we get these horrible chemicals out of the water, out of the air, out of the food supply, we can prevent people from being born thinking that they were born in the wrong body.
We can prevent, you know, transgender people suffer.
They really do suffer.
It's an avoidable harm.
I mean, it's very easy to take the, you know, to take the mick out of these crazy people and their crazy ideas.
And some of them are crazy.
And some of it is just a social contagion, you know, in the same way that eating disorders are social contagions.
Bulimia anorexia have been cutting.
That kind of stuff has been a social contagion.
But there is also this biological core and there is also this kind of biological crisis.
And so if you could do something like that, why wouldn't you?
Like, you're the compassionate people, aren't you?
You're the people who want actually to help people.
Well, why don't you want to clean up the environment?
Why don't you want to stop children being exposed to massive amounts of atrazine in the womb?
And the irony is they would if it was the other way around.
If we said, hey, we have a chemical that we can give to gay people, it'll make them straight, they would go.
That's a crime against humanity.
Well, it's what's happening here.
It's just the other way around.
And you know what?
On that note, we'll go to calls after this, but clip 37 here.
I was going to play this today anyway because as good as Maha has been, as good as RFK has been, they are doing things with pesticide that are completely inexplicable and horrible.
So let's go.
This is Sean Johnson, but he's talking about something we've reported on a few times.
Clip 37, they're doing it on the national level.
Now, apparently, Tennessee is trying to give basically carte blanche total legal immunity to international pesticide companies.
One of the basic rights that we have as Americans, or more specifically, today, Tennesseeans have the right to a court if we've been harmed.
And today, here in Tennessee, the officials that you and I both elected are proposing a bill that gives immunity to get this foreign, not even American, pesticide companies.
It's worrying because, I mean, RFK Jr. for 30 years plus has been an advocate for holding these corporations accountable.
And he's shone a light, a very bright light on the iniquities of the regulatory system that allows these corporations to get away with poisoning people and with pretending that their products aren't enormously harmful.
And so, yeah, I mean, it was always going to be a central plank of Make America Healthy again.
We're going to have a new regulatory system.
We're going to hold these companies accountable.
We're not going to let them spray the food and the environment with harmful chemicals, chemicals that they know are harmful as well.
I mean, there was that very, very, there's that very, very funny, very famous clip of a Bayer or a Monsanto executive, as it was then, saying, oh, yeah, I'll drink a glass of glyphosate there.
And no, no possible harm could come to a human being from consuming a glass of glyphosate.
And then the interviewer calls the guy's bluff and it's like, well, we've actually got some got some glyphosate here.
I'll pour you a glass of glyphosate and you can drink it just to show how safe your product is.
I think it was Monsanto's had like a, you know, they called it like the black office where they would go and like intimidate reporters into not covering this stuff.
I mean, you know, you don't do that if you are not doing anything wrong, right?
It just seems kind of obvious.
Yeah, they're scrambling.
You know, maybe on that note, well, we'll go to calls.
I don't want to keep people holding on too much, but one of the things that came up at the World Economic Forum today was water and the availability of water.
And we know if you've been paying attention to what they've been saying, you know, they're like, well, a virus is a little bit too out there, but people understand water.
Hey, I'm in agreement with you regarding the World Economic Forum and all of Trump's statement.
If we don't see prosecutions, it is nothing but hot air.
However, now here's the, however, there is a little bit of reporting that was done either by Brianna or by yourself in the last, I'd say, 72 hours in which when the sheriff showed up in Minneapolis, those protesters for ICE kind of calmed down.
We don't need the National Guard.
Sheriff deputies have all the powers we would need.
And even in a blue city, the county surrounding it, if read, can direct that sheriff as to calm that area down.
So this is just one of the things we the people have in our back pocket as a tool.
You've heard me harp on the sheriff for years.
If they don't act accordingly, you vote them out.
Get your election integrity up to check, and you can control that sheriff very evenly.
Yeah, I mean, I think obviously the Trump administration has to be careful.
I mean, it wasn't, I mean, the woman, Renee Good, who was shot, I mean, that was largely unavoidable, I think.
I mean, we're talking with the benefit of hindsight.
I mean, the man was going to be run over, but you don't want that happening.
You don't want to increase the likelihood of that happening.
And I do think that it's always a leftist tactic just to just to dial things up, you know, dial up the tension, dial up the force your opponents, you know, to kind of accelerate and to resort to, you know, tougher and tougher measures that make a confrontation and perhaps even make a fatal confrontation or certainly violence inevitable.
And so there's a fine line to be walked, I think, where, you know, okay, yeah, there has to be a display of force.
Of course there does, because if you back down in this situation, then the leftists are empowered and they're going to, it will get worse rather than better.
But at the same time, there are better and worse ways to make a display of force.
I mean, it's a really unenviable position to be in.
I wouldn't want to be the one directing the decisions and having to choose, well, do I send in the National Guard?
What do I do?
You know, how do I handle this situation?
But ultimately, they do only respect force, and there does have to be some kind of display of force.
There has to be a reassertion, a restoration of order.
And it's not going to come from the state.
It's not going to come from the governor's office.
It's not going to come from within Minnesota as a whole.
I think there is going to have to be, to some extent, some kind of outside intervention.
Yeah, and it's any sort of missiles that were to fly into America would go over the Arctic.
They wouldn't go around latitudinally.
So, you know, it'd be important for missile defense.
What do you think is behind the urgency, though?
That's what confuses.
Like, I get that Greenland would be a good thing to have for national security.
I think it has a lot to do with natural resources and AI, and that we need stuff out of Greenland that is necessary for building AI ships and stuff like that.
But I'm just, I'm shocked at the just the fact that this is just dominating the conversation and that it's like, this has to get done right now.
Like, what is it about Greenland that's so urgent?
And I'll get your input 22, but you have any idea about this?
I think there's a desire to control trade and to ensure that China and Russia don't control the trade.
The rare earth thing I think is obviously true.
I mean, regardless of whether or not, you know, rare earth minerals are harder to access in Greenland than they might be in, say, Australia or in China or whatever.
The Trump administration certainly doesn't want those minerals to be controlled by China or Russia.
I mean, this stuff about drone subs is fascinating, and I had no idea.
I mean, you know, the U.S. has sought to control Greenland and even to purchase Greenland for a long time.
I mean, this is actually a long-term strategic, geostrategic concern for the U.S.
And, you know, I mean, after World War II, then there was serious talk of purchasing Greenland as a site for strategic bombers and then as a site for missile defense and staging posts and all that kind of stuff.
So I think it's probably multifaceted.
I don't think it's just one thing.
I mean, it's clearly a very, very valuable territory for a number of different reasons.
So you could really set up a sweet AI computer server farm up there because you can use the cooling from the Arctic and geothermal because the energy matters so much for big scale AI stuff.
And I mean, that is actually something that I touch on in the new book.
Like I say, okay, there are things that we can do individually and that we should do individually.
I mean, one of the hallmarks of being a masculine man is having discipline, taking control of your life.
So we want to encourage people to do that.
I mean, obviously, we need something like Maha to happen.
We do need new regulations.
We need a totally new regulatory system for harmful chemicals.
We need to educate children properly.
We need to make sure that children are eating the right things in schools and all that kind of stuff.
But the broader problem that I raise, but don't necessarily answer in the book, leave as an open question, is actually like, does masculine, even if we did all of those things, does masculinity have a real future, masculinity as we understand it, have a real future in a liberal future?
If just liberal democracy continues as it is and has been, what place is there for men?
Do men just have to be satisfied with being consumers, working an office job, all that kind of stuff?
Or is there a different kind of existence that's possible outside the confines of liberal democracy?
It's a real question, but it is a civilizational question.
And this is what I try to say.
It's like testosterone decline isn't a niche concern.
It's actually, this is central to civilization, to understanding civilization and its future potentially rather than just being a niche concern.
And I think fathers and male role models are important too, because, of course, education isn't just about, you know, spurting a load of information at people.
It's actually leading by example, which we were talking about.
And so, I mean, one of the things that I think is so corrosive about modern day life, modern education, is the fact that actually most kids, most boys will be educated throughout their childhood and teenage years by women.
You know, I mean, if you told a traditional tribal society, oh, yeah, what you should do is you should, you know, allow the young men to be raised as men by the women.
But you know what's funny is that actually this is a genuine documented anthropological phenomenon across societies.
It's called something like the joking uncle.
Right.
Where actually, you know, you see in traditional societies, the role of the uncle is to do exactly what your uncle did, is to be this kind of playful antagonist who is kind of egging on the young men or the young man to kind of develop in particular ways.
And he has this jokey relationship that's very different from the relationship of the father to the son.
Like you need to be prodded and poked and you need to develop some resilience and self-deprecating humor.
You need to be able to laugh at yourself.
You need to be able to laugh at misfortune.
Yeah.
Your sisters are given nice presents and you're given a piece of coal.
It's like, you know, if you can laugh at that as a young child and you can deal with that, then you're actually in a position where you're kind of fortified for life.
And that's really, you know, that's how you make people strong.
And that's what liberals don't really understand is that you don't make people strong by insulating them from harm.
You make people strong by exposing them in increments to harm.
There are just so many things like that because, again, I just see connections to health overall and the immune system and this idea that, oh, there's a virus.
Everybody go inside and shut the door.
It's literally the opposite.
You need exposure to this stuff in order to become strong.
Wow.
Yeah.
Absolutely brilliant.
Yeah.
And of course, the thing about that also was the understanding that just because somebody else has something doesn't mean you've been deprived of anything.
That was actually the lesson that he was trying to teach me: look, if I give your sister something, I haven't stolen anything from you.
You have not been harmed.
Why aren't you happy your sister got something?
And that, I think, is like a key understanding.
Over New Year's, there was in France where all the fireworks were going off, there was a crowd with shining lasers at the people on the balconies.
And it's like, what the hell?
They didn't steal anything from you.
It's not like if they weren't up there, you'd be up there, but there's this just this jealousy, envy that's so pernicious and dangerous.
And I think, and I see it in my own kids, and it's hard to know how to go, look, nothing was stolen from you, kid.
Your sister got something you didn't.
Good for her.
Be happy.
I think that's a really key sort of underlying psychological thing that people are missing these days.
Yeah, and I think also what that points to, too, is that there is, I mean, we've been talking about politics as a biological phenomenon.
There is a biological basis to leftism.
And I think leftism harnesses particular instincts and directs them and shapes them in particular ways.
And yes, I mean, kids are envious of each other, but a properly functioning right-wing society or just a normal society knocks that out of them and shows them how low it is.
And that actually, look, okay, you know, you've got to be able to deal with this because life isn't fair.
Like you think Christmas time isn't fair maybe because you didn't get everything you want.
Well, guess what it's going to be like when you're an adult and you're providing for a family and you have to go out and work and fight to exist.
But yeah, the left really does harness these almost like they are childlike emotions.
They're childish emotions.
It's like you should grow out of thinking that just because someone else has something you don't, that they've stolen it from you.
It's all a zero-sum game.
But no, instead, what the left does is they allow those petty instincts that should be knocked out of people to grow and take on this monstrous form where it's actually the entirety of society needs to be upended and whole classes of people need to be murdered, need to be taken out into a field and shot and thrown in a trench because they have more than you.
And so they take these bad instincts, these bad impulses that we have, but they're useful to them because they can sort of twist them and go, not only are you being deprived, everybody's being deprived.
So by latching onto that and pursuing that seething hatred you feel, you're a hero because you're defending all these others who don't have it.
So it turns that vice into a virtue falsely, obviously.
And it's becoming more prevalent outside the U.S. as well.
And so you'll find even in the UK, you'll find, you know, if you go on a nice cheese, I mean, I went to Paris for New Year, right?
And I had some really crazy cheese.
Like I ended up, my policy actually for buying cheese was, okay, go in the fromagerie and select the cheese that looks like it's been in the bin the longest.
It was, yeah, they were all delicious, you know, like these horrible goats' cheeses that were like green and succurating, you know, but like they were, they were so good.
But so I went home and I was like, okay, I want to get some of this stuff at home.
And so I was on these fancy websites, you know, looking at expensive French cheeses.
And they would say, you know, natural, natural rennet made with natural rennet, non non-GMO rennet.
And yeah, so it's, it's a big thing that people don't know about.
You think, oh, cheese, well, cheese, you know, it's just milk.
And it's a, it's a traditional product and it's made in the traditional way.
No, rennet has been replaced, traditional rennet, extracted from the stomachs of sheep and cows, because that's what it is.
It's an enzyme that makes milk coagulate and separate into curds and whey.
That's been replaced by GMO.
So people are eating cheese, even expensive cheese in the US, and they're consuming GMO without their knowledge.
I mean, it's just really what it is, is it's just yet another indictment of the way that the food supply has been organized, right?
It's like, you know, you think you're paying good money to eat some nice cheese and you think, oh, this is healthy.
You know, this is going to do me some good.
And actually, you are consuming GMO without your knowledge.
And nobody thought that that would be a bad idea and that actually, A, it should, maybe it should be prevented.
And actually, you know, you should preserve traditional foodways and methods of making food.
And B, that consumers deserve to be informed about the choices that they're making.
My whole thought was I caught the tail end of what you were talking about with the hero's journey and George R. Martin and I believe it was Lord of the Rings.
And I found it interesting that we used to have stories of the hero's journey and defeating the bad guy.
And now I don't know if we're seeing more of it, but we're seeing either the idea of the good guy losing.
I think that one of your callers a couple months ago mentioned the movie sell.
And the whole premise of this guy is trying to save the son only to find that it's somewhat corrupted, even though he didn't realize it.
And yet basically he gets corrupted as well as everyone else.
And All the Get the Plan movie where the bad guys are actually literally.
So I actually heard, I actually heard a very interesting theory about this just before the show today, that Lindsey Graham, basically that Trump, the whole, so about a week ago, we were like on the cusp of bombing Iran, right?
And it was this big thing.
And basically what this guy said was Trump was telling everybody, including Lindsey Graham and Mossad, basically, yeah, we're going to go to war with Iran.
So they sent all their Mossad agents out to start this big, to start these big riots.
And then Trump said, you know, never mind, we're not going to bomb.
So we totally set up.
And so maybe part of his like celebrating Lindsey Graham is to convince them, like, yeah, I'm totally on your side.
We're totally going to do this.
Only at the last minute to go, no, we're not going to do that, causing them to burn all of their networks in Iran, but not actually achieve anything.
So his friendship with Lindsey Graham may be a little bit of a bluff.
I don't know.
But I thought that was an interesting take on it.
What do you think about Trump's friendship with little Lindsey?
Let me introduce you to Ultimate Life Force from theAlexJonesStore.com.
We call this a triple action spike protein detox, and it was developed in order to combat the spike protein toxins from the COVID-19 jabs.
But you don't have to have taken a jab to be susceptible to this, especially with the offloading that happens with these spike proteins.
But whether or not you're concerned about spike protein toxification, you're going to want this Ultimate Life Force, a precision detox formula trusted by Infowarriers the world over.
Every four capsule serving of this stuff floods your body with 400 milligrams of pharmaceutical grade NAC to skyrocket glutathione, your body's master antioxidant.
It also has 100 micrograms of selenium in its most bioavailable form, supercharging detoxification at the cellular level.
It also has 4,000 fibronolytic units of natokinase and 80,000 units of cerapeptase, two powerhouse enzymes clinically shown to break down unwanted fibrin and protein buildup that can linger for years.
500 milligrams of bromelain plus concentrated turmeric with bioperin for rapid systemic anti-inflammatory relief you feel in days, not weeks.
This isn't just another supplement.
It's the exact protocol leading health pioneers recommend for long-hauler recovery, post-viral clarity, and reclaiming true vitality.
Users report sharper thinking, deeper sleep, lighter breathing, and energy that keeps climbing week after week.
One capsule bottle, 30 days, one decision that can change everything.
It's Ultimate Life Force.
Clear the past, own your future, order now from the AlexJonesStore.com.
unidentified
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever.
The fight will continue.
Be sure to follow us on X at RealAlexJones and at AJN Live.
And now you can download the number one news app in the world.